Abstract: A 3D model component comparing system and method thereof are provided. The 3D model component comparing system includes a model-capturing unit, a processing unit, and a message-prompting unit. The model-capturing unit obtains a first model and a second model in a model design interface. The processing unit compares a plurality of components of the first model and a plurality of components of the second model to obtain a plurality of components which have different names, and analyzes them to determine whether the plurality of components which have different names have identical component data correspondingly or not. The message-prompting unit outputs a renaming prompting message if the plurality of components, which have different names, have identical component data correspondingly. Thus the design error rate is reduced.

Abstract: A retaining structure and a server structure having the same are provided herein. The retaining structure is used for retaining a circuit board on a chassis in the server structure. The circuit board includes a first connection portion and a second connection portion for respectively mating with a first connector and a second connector. The retaining structure includes a plurality of side walls commonly defining a channel for accommodating a region of the circuit board, a backstop section located within the channel and abutting against a protrusion of the circuit board for buffering a mating force applied from the second connection portion to the first connection portion, and a damping snapper located on one of said side was for damping the retaining structure to the chassis.

Abstract: A 3D model component comparing system and method thereof are provided. The 3D model component comparing system includes a model-capturing unit, a processing unit, and a message-prompting unit. The model-capturing unit obtains a first model and a second model in a model design interface. The processing unit determines whether a plurality of component data of a plurality of components in components, which have the same component names, between the first model and the second model are all accordingly identical. The message-prompting unit outputs a renaming prompting message if the plurality of component data of the plurality of components in the components which have the same component names between the first model and the second model are not all accordingly identical. Thus design error rate is reduced.

Abstract: A method for verifying design changes of components based on a CAD platform is utilized to graphically show differences between previous and current versions of a 3D component. The method includes the following steps performed by a computer: sequentially comparing a plurality of design features of the previous and current versions of the 3D component; distinguishing a feature difference and showing it in a list on a page; altering a filename of the previous version; assembling the 3D component of the previous version whose filename is altered and the 3D component of the current versions in a single assembly to form a 3D drawing; and generating a link corresponding to the feature difference, so that the corresponding feature can be displayed on the 3D drawing when clicking on the feature difference on the page. A CAD system is also provided.

Abstract: A 3D model component comparing system and method thereof are provided. The 3D model component comparing system includes a capturing unit, a setting unit, a processing unit and a prompting unit. The capturing unit acquires a first model and a second model. The setting unit sets a 3D absolute coordinate into the first model and the second model. The processing unit compares a plurality of components between the first model and the second model in the 3D absolute coordinate and determines whether coordinate values of the plurality of components which have the same component names between the first model and the second model are not identical. The prompting unit outputs a prompting message if the coordinate values of the plurality of components, which have the same component names, between the first model and the second model are not identical. Thus design error rate is reduced.