Abstract: The described technology is generally directed towards comparing two images for content differences, such as images based on the frames of a show and a derivative version of that show. Frame pairs such as from an original show and its derivative version are processed into image pairs, which can include decoding, scaling, luminance extraction and/or filtering. An edge pixel image is obtained via edge detection for each image. Edge pixels in one image are compared against a counterpart edge pixel (and possibly neighboring pixels) in the other image to determine matches (matching edge pixels) and mismatches. An image with too many errors based on the mismatches is deemed as a candidate for further review. A difference image can be generated to assist a reviewer in detecting where the mismatches were detected. By repeating for the various frames, a show can be automatically compared against its derivative for content differences.

Abstract: The described technology is directed towards generating a new video image sequence (e.g., for playback at 30 frames per second) based on an existing video image sequence (e.g., originated for playback at 24 frames per second). The technology is based on processing frames, e.g., adjacent pairs of frames in a four-frame sequence, to obtain candidate frames for selecting a similar candidate frame to insert into the original sequence to create the new sequence (e.g., a five-frame sequence). Aspects include selecting a repeated frame to insert or creating a new frame from existing frames to insert, to generate the new sequence based on a difference/scoring comparison.

Abstract: The described technology is generally directed towards comparing two images for content differences, such as images based on the frames of a show and a derivative version of that show. Frame pairs such as from an original show and its derivative version are processed into image pairs, which can include decoding, scaling, luminance extraction and/or filtering. An edge pixel image is obtained via edge detection for each image. Edge pixels in one image are compared against a counterpart edge pixel (and possibly neighboring pixels) in the other image to determine matches (matching edge pixels) and mismatches. An image with too many errors based on the mismatches is deemed as a candidate for further review. A difference image can be generated to assist a reviewer in detecting where the mismatches were detected. By repeating for the various frames, a show can be automatically compared against its derivative for content differences.

Abstract: The described technology is generally directed towards comparing two images for content differences, such as images based on the frames of a show and a derivative version of that show. Frame pairs such as from an original show and its derivative version are processed into image pairs, which can include decoding, scaling, luminance extraction and/or filtering. An edge pixel image is obtained via edge detection for each image. Edge pixels in one image are compared against a counterpart edge pixel (and possibly neighboring pixels) in the other image to determine matches (matching edge pixels) and mismatches. An image with too many errors based on the mismatches is deemed as a candidate for further review. A difference image can be generated to assist a reviewer in detecting where the mismatches were detected. By repeating for the various frames, a show can be automatically compared against its derivative for content differences.

Abstract: The described technology is directed towards generating a new video image sequence (e.g., for playback at 30 frames per second) based on an existing video image sequence (e.g., originated for playback at 24 frames per second). The technology is based on processing frames, e.g., adjacent pairs of frames in a four-frame sequence, to obtain candidate frames for selecting a similar candidate frame to insert into the original sequence to create the new sequence (e.g., a five-frame sequence). Aspects include selecting a repeated frame to insert or creating a new frame from existing frames to insert, to generate the new sequence based on a difference/scoring comparison.

Abstract: The described technology is generally directed towards comparing two images for content differences, such as images based on the frames of a show and a derivative version of that show. Frame pairs such as from an original show and its derivative version are processed into image pairs, which can include decoding, scaling, luminance extraction and/or filtering. An edge pixel image is obtained via edge detection for each image. Edge pixels in one image are compared against a counterpart edge pixel (and possibly neighboring pixels) in the other image to determine matches (matching edge pixels) and mismatches. An image with too many errors based on the mismatches is deemed as a candidate for further review. A difference image can be generated to assist a reviewer in detecting where the mismatches were detected. By repeating for the various frames, a show can be automatically compared against its derivative for content differences.

Abstract: The described technology is directed towards generating a new video image sequence (e.g., for playback at 30 frames per second) based on an existing video image sequence (e.g., originated for playback at 24 frames per second). The technology is based on processing frames, e.g., adjacent pairs of frames in a four-frame sequence, to obtain candidate frames for selecting a similar candidate frame to insert into the original sequence to create the new sequence (e.g., a five-frame sequence). Aspects include selecting a repeated frame to insert or creating a new frame from existing frames to insert, to generate the new sequence based on a difference/scoring comparison.

Abstract: The described technology is directed towards generating a new video image sequence (e.g., for playback at 30 frames per second) based on an existing video image sequence (e.g., originated for playback at 24 frames per second). The technology is based on processing frames, e.g., adjacent pairs of frames in a four-frame sequence, to obtain candidate frames for selecting a similar candidate frame to insert into the original sequence to create the new sequence (e.g., a five-frame sequence). Aspects include selecting a repeated frame to insert or creating a new frame from existing frames to insert, to generate the new sequence based on a difference/scoring comparison.

Abstract: In a system and method of watermarking content for tracking media consumption, the method may include creating, by a computer processor, at least one copy of a mezzanine asset for distribution to at least one user, the mezzanine asset being watermarked with a watermark identifier, and the at least one copy including a copy of the watermark identifier.

Abstract: In a system and method of watermarking content for tracking media consumption, the method may include creating, by a computer processor, at least one copy of a mezzanine asset for distribution to at least one user, the mezzanine asset being watermarked with a watermark identifier, and the at least one copy including a copy of the watermark identifier.

Abstract: An automated playlist chaser (APC) improves the recovery time and robustness of playlists to component failures and/or human errors in a content sourcing and editing environment. Following detection and correction of an error in a content sourcing subsystem controlled by a playlist, the APC retrieves a last known good playlist from a playlist archive and automatically builds a new playlist for resynchronization of the subsystem. Building the new playlist involves iteratively solving for the first new program segment entry in the new playlist and the new “on-air time,” “start-of message,” and “duration” attributes for the entry as a function of a reference time (e.g., the present time of day), the original on-air time for the entry, the subsystem recovery time, the APC processing time, and the queuing delay of the audio-video source for the program segment.