Abstract: A local entity without its own means of voice communication is provided with the semblance of having a voice interaction capability. This is done by providing a beacon device at or near the entity, the beacon device transmitting, over a short-range communication link, contact data identifying a voice service associated with, but hosted separately from, the entity. The transmitted contact data is picked up by equipment carried by a nearby person and used to contact the voice service over a wireless network. The person then interacts with the voice service, the latter acting as a voice proxy for the local entity. The contact data can be presented to the user in other ways, for example, by being inscribed on the local entity for scanning or user input into the equipment.

Abstract: A telephone call may be received or made by the user of telephony-enabled apparatus in circumstances, such as during a meeting, where spoken responses by the user to what the other party to the call has said are unacceptable. A telephony method and arrangement are disclosed which permits a user to use silent input to the telephony-enabled apparatus in order to generate a response to the other party to the call. Response generation is facilitated by enabling the user to effect a selection from the content of the other party's input, or from options derived from that input, with this selection then being used in forming the response.

Abstract: The claims have been amended to clarify their scope having regard to the terms used and the operation of the described embodiments. More particularly, in claim 1: The system by which user input is provided was originally referred to as an “asynchronous” system which is potentially misleading as the description makes it clear that the input can be collected by an audio server 33 (which would interact in a synchronous manner with respect to the user). Claim 1 is now clarified to indicate that it is the general interaction between the user and the synchronous transaction system that is asynchronous in nature rather than the operation of the user-input system. (though the latter could be asynchronous in operation). The qualification of the transaction system as a “voice” transaction system is potentially misleading because it is clear from the description that the interaction with the synchronous transaction system may occur at, for example, the VoiceXML script level without any voice signals being produced.