Abstract: Embodiments of the disclosure provide systems and methods for managing a lifecycle of a software application. According to one embodiment, software application lifecycle management can comprise receiving a specification for an application. The specification can comprise an executable script defining a plurality of features for the application and a plurality of scenarios. Each scenario representing a test for one or more features of the application and each feature comprising one or more user stories. A test entity can be created for and corresponding to each scenario in the specification and each scenario can be marked with a test identifier linking the created test entity to the corresponding scenario in the script. Results of execution of one or more scenarios of the plurality of scenarios can be received and reported on a per-feature and per-scenario basis.

Abstract: Embodiments of the disclosure provide systems and methods for managing a lifecycle of a software application. According to one embodiment, software application lifecycle management can comprise receiving a specification for an application. The specification can comprise an executable script defining a plurality of features for the application and a plurality of scenarios. Each scenario representing a test for one or more features of the application and each feature comprising one or more user stories. A test entity can be created for and corresponding to each scenario in the specification and each scenario can be marked with a test identifier linking the created test entity to the corresponding scenario in the script. Results of execution of one or more scenarios of the plurality of scenarios can be received and reported on a per-feature and per-scenario basis.

Abstract: According to examples, an apparatus may include a processor and a non-transitory computer readable medium storing machine readable instructions. The instructions may cause the processor to access a plurality of widgets, in which each of the plurality of widgets includes a data value. The instructions may also cause the processor to identify a widget of the plurality of widgets including a data value that has changed over time by an amount that exceeds a pre-defined threshold as a widget-of-interest and output a notification regarding a suggestion for the widget-of-interest to be displayed on a user dashboard.

Abstract: A method for evaluating user interface efficiency includes discerning user actions with the user interface occurring between each of a plurality of adjacent pairs of transaction points. Those adjacent pairs of transaction points are evaluated to identify a given one of a plurality of user flows associated with the user interface. The identified user actions occurring between each adjacent pair of transaction points are assessed to calculate an efficiency score. The efficiency score is associated with the identified user flow and is indicative of user interface efficiency.

Abstract: According to examples, an apparatus may include a processor and a non-transitory computer readable medium storing machine readable instructions. The instructions may cause the processor to access a plurality of widgets, in which each of the plurality of widgets includes a data value. The instructions may also cause the processor to identify a widget of the plurality of widgets including a data value that has changed over time by an amount that exceeds a pre-defined threshold as a widget-of-interest and output a notification regarding a suggestion for the widget-of-interest to be displayed on a user dashboard.

Abstract: Systems, machine readable media, and methods are provided. An example method can include populating cells of a matrix with a plurality of user interface (UI) configuration parameters to determine a total number of testable UI configurations, reducing a number of the cells of the matrix by combining at least two UI configuration parameters to determine a reduced number of UI configurations to test, executing a number of predetermined tests, where test results depend on input of the reduced number of UI configurations, and determining the UI coverage based upon the test results.

Abstract: A method for evaluating user interface efficiency includes discerning user actions with the user interface occurring between each of a plurality of adjacent pairs of transaction points. Those adjacent pairs of transaction points are evaluated to identify a given one of a plurality of user flows associated with the user interface. The identified user actions occurring between each adjacent pair of transaction points are assessed to calculate an efficiency score. The efficiency score is associated with the identified user flow and is indicative of user interface efficiency.

Abstract: Systems, machine readable media, and methods are provided. An example method can include populating cells of a matrix with a plurality of user interface (UI) configuration parameters to determine a total number of testable UI configurations, reducing a number of the cells of the matrix by combining at least two UI configuration parameters to determine a reduced number of UI configurations to test, executing a number of predetermined tests, where test results depend on input of the reduced number of UI configurations, and determining the UI coverage based upon the test results.