Method and apparatus for controlling wellbore operations

Method and apparatus for controlling wellbore operations include a wellbore communication system comprising: a control sub-assembly with a first control unit, a second control unit, one or more downhole sub-assemblies interchangeably mounted on and carried by a bottom hole assembly, each downhole sub-assembly configured to wirelessly send and receive signals from the second control unit.

Skip to: Description  ·  Claims  ·  References Cited  · Patent History  ·  Patent History
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

This disclosure relates to controlling drilling and other wellbore operations.

BACKGROUND

Wellbores can be drilled into geologic formations for a variety of reasons, such as, for example, hydrocarbon production, fluid injection, or water production. During wellbore drilling, a variety of tasks may need to be performed, each requiring different tools to be sent downhole. The term workover refers to any kind of wellbore intervention that necessitates, for example, the expensive process of removing and replacing a drill string, an operation that requires considerable time and expense.

SUMMARY

The technology relates to a downhole wellbore communication tool that provides wireless communication between downhole well operation tools and the surface. The technology can be used for downhole equipment (for example, drilling, completion, and workover equipment) that can be accessed by Wi-Fi communication. The tool passes information from downhole well operation tools to the surface and passes signals and commands to the downhole well operation tools. The communication tool is compact and can be mounted, for example, to a bottom hole assembly or drill string.

Some communication tools include a master control unit and a second (or auxiliary) control unit. The master control unit includes a processor with a transmitter and a receiver, and is coupled to a memory device. The second control unit also includes a processor with a transmitter and a receiver, and is coupled to a memory device. The processors of both units are powered by a stand-alone power source, for example, a lithium battery. In addition to receiving and transmitting data between the downhole well operation tools and the surface, each processor can deliver a full diagnostic of the well tools in real time and can identify points of failure.

In one aspect, wellbore communication systems include: a control sub-assembly including: a first control unit including a first processor, a first transmitter, a first receiver and a first memory, the first control unit operable to send and receive wireless signals from the surface; a second control unit including a second processor, a second transmitter, a second receiver and a second memory, the second control unit operable to send and receive wireless signals from the first control unit; and one or more downhole sub-assemblies interchangeably mounted on and carried by a bottom hole assembly, each of the one or more downhole sub-assembly configured to wirelessly send and receive signals from the second control unit. The first control unit is configured to organize information received from the one or more downhole sub-assemblies, organize the information in a standard telemetry sequence, and send it to the surface.

In one aspect, methods of controlling wellbore operations include: receiving, by a first control unit deployed within a wellbore and from a surface of the wellbore, instructions to perform operations within the wellbore; transmitting, by the first control assembly, at least a portion of the instructions to a second control unit downhole of the first control unit; receiving, by the second control unit, instructions to perform operations within the wellbore; selecting, by the second control unit, to which of a plurality of downhole tools a signal should be sent; transmitting, by the second control assembly, at least a portion of the instructions to at least one of the plurality of downhole tools.

Systems and methods can include one or more of the following features.

In some embodiments, the second control unit is configured to receive a signal from the first control unit and determine to which of the plurality of downhole sub-assemblies to send a signal.

In some embodiments, the first control unit includes: one or more processors; and a computer-readable medium storing instructions executable by the one or more processors to perform operations including: receiving, from a surface of the wellbore, instructions to perform operations within the wellbore; and transmitting, to at least one of the plurality of sub-assemblies, at least a portion of the instructions. In some cases, the operations further include: receiving, from at least one of the plurality of sub-assemblies, status signals representing a status of the at least one of the plurality of sub-assemblies; and transmitting, to the surface of the wellbore, the status signals. The status signals can include a state of a sub-assembly, the state including either an on state or an off state. The system can further include: one or more transmitters at the surface of the wellbore, the one or more transmitters configured to transmit the instructions to the one or more processors; and one or more receivers at the surface of the wellbore, the one or more receivers configured to receive the status signals from the one or more processors.

In one embodiment, the system includes one or more repeaters configured to be positioned between the surface and the bottom hole assembly within the wellbore, the one or more repeaters configured to boost a strength of a wireless signal between the one or more transmitters or the one or more receivers and the one or more processors.

In some embodiments, the first control unit further includes a power source configured to provide operating power to the one or more processors.

In some embodiments, the control sub-assembly is a first control sub-assembly and the system further includes a second control sub-assembly including a first control unit and a second control unit.

Some methods include: transmitting, by the at least one of the plurality of sub-assemblies to the second control assembly, status signals representing a status of the at least one of the plurality of sub-assemblies; and receiving, by the first control assembly, the status signals from the at least one of the plurality of sub-assemblies. In some cases, methods include transmitting, by the first control assembly to the surface of the wellbore, the status signals from the at least one of the plurality of sub-assemblies.

Advantages of the system include the ability to communicate information between the surface and downhole wirelessly, without mud pulse telemetry. In addition, this technology can keep full communication while drilling depleted reservoir zones or fracture zones that induce large fluid losses to the formation. Such losses affect the quality of mud pulse signals but do not affect the described systems that use WI-Fi communication. Loss of fluid to the formation can also cause plugging of the formation by the lost circulation material. By avoiding weak signal and plugging issues, these systems and methods also can reduce the rig/well time spent for communicating with downhole devices during drilling operations. In addition, these wireless systems free drilling engineers to place downhole drilling tools in different places by reducing limitations regarding downhole drilling equipment position.

These systems and methods can improve the drilling process performance and enhances safety in oil and gas wells having hydrogen sulfide concentrations. The use of Wi-Fi communication avoids the need for a sensor in contact with drilling and/or completion fluid. For example, an associated sensor can be attached to the standpipe that the drilling and/or completion mud goes through. This approach limits the exposure of personnel to fluids that maybe contaminated with hydrogen sulfide.

The details of one or more embodiments of the systems and methods are set forth in the accompanying drawings and the description below. Other features, objects, and advantages will be apparent from the description and drawings, and from the claims.

DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of a wellbore drilling system.

FIG. 2 is a schematic of a control sub for use in a wellbore drilling system.

FIG. 3 shows a block diagram of an example control system of the control sub.

FIGS. 4A and 4B are schematic side views of a portion of an example downhole operation tool in communication with the control system.

FIG. 5 is a schematic side views of a portion of an example downhole operation tool in communication with the control system.

FIG. 6 is a flowchart showing an example method of controlling downhole tools with the control sub.

Like reference symbols in the various drawings indicate like elements.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The technology relates to a downhole wellbore communication tool that provides wireless communication between downhole well operation tools and the surface. The tool passes wellbore information from downhole well operation tools to the surface and passes signals and commands to the downhole well operation tools. The communication tool is compact and can be mounted to various parts of a bottom hole assembly or drill string.

Some communication tools include a master control unit and a second (or auxiliary) control unit. The master control unit includes a processor with a transmitter and a receiver, and is coupled to a memory device. The second control unit also includes a processor with a transmitter and a receiver, and is coupled to a memory device. The processors of both units are powered by a stand-alone power source or sources, for example, a lithium battery. In addition to receiving and transmitting data between the downhole well operation tools and the surface, each processor can deliver a diagnostic of the well tools in real time and can identify points of failure.

The system has two control units, each including a processor, a transmitter, a receiver, and a memory. The uphole or master control unit is wirelessly coupled to surface computers. The downhole or secondary control unit is wirelessly coupled to various downhole tools. The two control units are coupled to each other and are powered using a battery or batteries. The secondary control unit receives well information from the downhole tools and transmits information to the master control unit. The master control unit organizes the information in a standard telemetry sequence, and in turn sends the information to the surface.

FIG. 1 shows an example wellbore drilling system 100 being used in a wellbore 106. The wellbore drilling system 100 can be used in forming vertical, deviated, and horizontal wellbores. The well drilling system 100 includes a drill derrick 115 that supports the weight of and selectively positions a drill string 108 in the wellbore 106. The drill string 108 has a downhole end connected to a drill bit 110 that extends the wellbore 106 in the formation 104. Once drilled, the wellbore 106 is provided with a casing 118 that provides additional strength and support to the wellbore 106. The wellbore drilling system 100 includes a bottom hole assembly (BHA) 102. The BHA 102 can include a measurement while drilling (MWD) sub 120. These systems can also be used with other equipment such as, for example, cleanout tools, rotary steerable systems, and logging while drilling subs.

The BHA 102 also includes a control assembly 101 mounted on and carried by the BHA 102. The control assembly 101 is designed to be deployed in the wellbore 106 and is configured to handle shock-loads, other vibrations, high temperatures, hydrogen sulfide, corrosive chemicals, or other potential downhole hazards. The control assembly 101 communicates with multiple downhole well operation tools 103, 105 that are mounted on the BRA 102. The tools can be located above or below the control sub.

The wellbore drilling system 100 includes one or more transmitters 112 at or near the surface 116. The one or more transmitters 112 are operable to transmit communications such as, for example, operation instructions to the control assembly 101. In addition to the transmitters 112, one or more receivers 113 are positioned at or near the surface 116. The one or more receivers 113 are operable to receive one or more status signals from the control assembly 101. The transmitter(s) 112 and the receiver(s) 113 communicate wirelessly with the control assembly 101. In some implementations, the wireless communication include radio frequency communication, such as Wi-Fi. In some implementations, the transmitters and receivers are located near (for example, above or below) the surface of the ground as stand-alone units or mounted on other components of the drilling system.

The wellbore drilling system 100 includes repeaters 114 positioned between the surface 116 and the BHA 102 within the wellbore 106. The repeaters 114 can boost a strength of a wireless signal between the one or more transmitters 112 or the one or more receivers 113 and the control assembly 101. Some wellbore drilling systems are implemented without repeaters 114.

FIG. 2 shows a communication tool 200 which is part of the control assembly 101 that can be included as part of the BHA 102. For example, the communication tool can be part of control assembly 101. The communication tool 200 has a sub body 204 that attaches to the drill string in a conventional manner. Currently, the MWD or communication subs are located at the BHA. In contrast, the new control sub can be used at other locations in the drill string such as, for example, above the BHA in the drill pipes. The communication tool 200 communicates with various sub-assembly tools downhole to activate and de-activate them. The communication tool 200 includes a master control unit 220A, a secondary control unit 220B, and a battery 222. The communication tool also includes memory and a processor (not shown). Each control unit 220A, 220B includes one or more transmitters and receivers. In some applications, these transmitters and receivers provide real-time communication between the communication tool and the surface delivering, for example, information regarding the functioning of the downhole tools to the surface and commands to the downhole tools.

FIG. 3 shows a block diagram 300 of the components of the communication tool 200 which includes the master control unit 220A and the secondary control unit 220B. The master control unit 220A is the interface between the communication tool and the surface while the secondary control unit 220B is the interface between the communication tool 200 and downhole equipment.

The master control unit 220A is operable to coordinate information transfer with the surface and to receive and delivery desired information to the secondary control unit 220B. The secondary control unit 220B is operable to coordinate information transfer with downhole equipment. The communication tool 200 is configured with wired communication between the master control unit 220A and the secondary control unit 220B. In some tools, the master control unit 220A and the secondary control unit 220B communicate with each other wirelessly instead of or in addition to such wired communication channels.

The master control unit 220A includes one or more processors 306A and a computer-readable medium 318A storing instructions executable by the one or more processors 306A to perform operations. The master control unit 220A also includes a transmitter 302A and receiver 304A operable to communicate with the surface 116. For example, after receiving instructions to perform operations within the wellbore, the master control unit can process and organize the instructions before relaying the instructions to the secondary control unit 220B. This processing and organizing can include identifying which tool will receive the desired information when the information is sent in a pre-setting sequence for different tools. This approach accounts for each tool having different function in the drill string and needing different configurations or modifications. The master control unit 220A also receives signals representing a status of the downhole tools, 340, 342, 344 from the secondary control unit 220B. The transmitter 302A can transmit the status signals to the surface 116. The processors 306A of the master control unit 220A organize information being transferred to the surface in a standard telemetry sequence in organized packages to be interpreted by field personnel. The status signals can include a state of the downhole tools such as, for example, an “on” state or an “off” state and the operational status of each tool such as, for example, leaks, temperature, and functionality.

Communication tools also include a power source or sources. The communication tool 200 has a single power source 222. The power source 222 is operatively coupled to and provides operating power to the master control unit 220A and the secondary control unit 220B. In some implementations, communication tools include multiple power sources (for example, each control unit powered by a separate battery). In some implementations, the power source is a lithium ion battery.

The secondary control unit 220B includes one or more processors 306B and a computer-readable medium 318B storing instructions executable by the one or more processors 306B to perform operations. The secondary control unit 220B also includes a transmitter 302B and receiver 304B operable to communicate with downhole equipment such as downhole tools 340, 342, 344. After receiving information from the master control unit 220A, the secondary control unit 220B determines to which of the plurality of downhole tools the signal should be sent. For example, the secondary control unit 220B determines for which of the downhole tools 340, 342, 344 the information is intended before relaying the instructions. After receive the information, the control sub can submit the desired command to different tools located across the drill string. The signal switch a specific tool between on and off states as well as sending different information for different tools at the same time.

The receiver 304B receives status signals representing a status of the downhole tools 340, 342, 344. The secondary control unit 220B can also transmit the status signals to the surface 116 via the master control unit 220A. The status signals can include a state of a communication assembly (such as an “on” state or an “off” state).

The communication tool 200 send signals to downhole tools 340, 342, 344. Each tool 340, 342, 344 has a respective receiver 304C, 304D, 304E that can be used to receive instructions from the second control unit transmitter 302B. Those instructions may be to perform operations within the wellbore. Each tool has a respective transmitter 302C, 302D, 302E that can transmit status signals representing a status of the respective downhole tool to the receiver 304B of the secondary control unit 220B. The secondary control unit 220B communicates the status signals to the surface 116 via the master control unit 220A. The status signals can include a state of each downhole tool (such as an “on” state or an “off” state).

In the case where a downhole tool 340, 342, 344 cannot communicate with the surface (for example, failure of the one or more processors 306A), communication is interrupted between the surface 116 and downhole drilling tools. However, if processor 306B is still functioning, it continues collecting and storing the information on computer-readable medium 318B. That stored information is processed when the communication tool 200 arrives at the surface 116, at which time the computer-readable medium 318B memory is downloaded to a surface computer and interpreted. The processor can be set to automatically collect and save data. For example, all communications and data received from tools can be saved in the memory in a sequence that they arrive.

In some embodiments, the method includes automatically maintaining the system functions based on pre-determined limits work. This functionality can be provided, for example, by pre-calibrating equipment on the surface to deliver certain limits or results. For example, MWD, LWD, and clean out tools can be pre-programmed with a maximum size to which the arms of a stabilizer are opened when the tool receives a signal to activate the stabilizer.

FIGS. 4A-4B show an example downhole tool 340 in communication with the secondary control unit 220B of communication tool 200. In this example, downhole tool 340 is a tool that anchors itself to the casing 118 of the wellbore 116. In FIG. 4A, anchors or slips 408 of the 340 are in a deactivated mode, while in FIG. 4B, the slips 408 of the tool 340 are in an activated mode. The tool 340 includes a hydraulic power unit 401 that acts as the activation and deactivation unit for the slips 408.

The hydraulic power unit 401 can receive at least a portion of the instructions from the secondary control unit 220B. Portions of the instructions can include changing states of a hydraulic power unit 401 to change position of the actuatable slips 408, or any other command that can be executed by the hydraulic power unit. The tool 340 receives such a signal to activate at its receiver 302C, to change its state to the activated mode (in FIG. 4B). The tool 340 may then transmit a signal of its status via its transmitter 304C.

FIG. 5 shows a cross-sectional view of a second example downhole tool 342 in the form of a magnetic sub-assembly 506 in communication with the secondary control unit 220B of communication tool 200. The magnetic sub-assembly 506 includes electromagnetic coils 502 within electromagnetic bars 512. The electromagnetic coils 502 and electromagnetic bars 512 are activated when a signal is received from the secondary control unit 220B at the receiver 302D of the tool 342. The electric power supplied to the electromagnetic coils 502 creates a magnetic field in the electromagnetic coils 502 and to the electromagnetic bars 512. The electromagnetic coils 502 can remain energized during a well trip so that any ferrous debris collected by the magnetic sub-assembly 506 can be removed from the wellbore 106 and brought to the surface 116. The magnetic sub-assembly 506 also includes sensors 510 to detect a status of the magnetic sub-assembly 506 and relay that information back to secondary control unit 220B, via transmitter 304D. The information relayed can include current draw or temperature at the magnetic sub-assembly 506.

FIG. 6 shows a flowchart of an example method 600 used for the wellbore drilling system. At 602, instructions to perform wellbore operations within the wellbore are received from a surface 116 by a control assembly deployed within the wellbore 106. The control assembly receives these instructions from the surface or the MWD sub via the receiver installed in the control assembly.

At 604, at least a portion of the wellbore instructions is transmitted by the control assembly to the second control assembly. The second control assembly analyzes and identifies which downhole tool to activate and sends the signal to the respective tool, step 606.

At 608, a respective tool element is activated within the wellbore. Each tool can be activated independently. Additionally, status signals representing a status of the at least one of the tools is transmitted by to the control assembly and then the control assembly. The status signals from the at least one of downhole assemblies is received at the surface.

The described systems can communicate with multiple tools at the same time. The number of tools will be limited due the capacity of the processor and memory. In some approaches, methods include identifying data needs for particular tools and choosing tools based on the capacity of the processor and memory. Similarly, the available downhole time for battery-powered systems can be limited by available power. For these systems, methods can include monitoring battery status of the control sub and controlling transmissions and other activity of the control sub based on battery state and the number of tools being controlled. In addition, methods can include setting the control sub to power on after a certain time, without need to send a command from the surface after being deployed in an inactive state.

While this specification contains many specific implementation details, these should not be construed as limitations on the scope of what may be claimed, but rather as descriptions of features specific to particular implementations of particular systems or methods. Certain features that are described in this specification in the context of separate implementations can also be implemented in combination in a single implementation. Conversely, various features that are described in the context of a single implementation can also be implemented in multiple implementations separately or in any suitable sub combination. Moreover, although features may be described above as acting in certain combinations and even initially claimed as such, one or more features from a claimed combination can, in some cases, be excised from the combination, and the claimed combination may be directed to a sub combination or variation of a sub combination.

Similarly, while operations are depicted in the drawings in a particular order, this should not be understood as requiring that such operations be performed in the particular order shown or in sequential order, or that all illustrated operations be performed, to achieve desirable results. In certain circumstances, multitasking and parallel processing may be advantageous. Moreover, the separation of various system components in the implementations described above should not be understood as requiring such separation in all implementations, and it should be understood that the described program components and systems can generally be integrated together in a single software product or packaged into multiple software products.

Thus, particular implementations of the subject matter have been described. Other implementations are within the scope of the following claims. In some cases, the actions recited in the claims can be performed in a different order and still achieve desirable results. In addition, the processes depicted in the accompanying figures do not necessarily require the particular order shown, or sequential order, to achieve desirable results. In certain implementations, multitasking and parallel processing may be advantageous.

A number of embodiments have been described. Nevertheless, it will be understood that various modifications may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the disclosure. For example, although the system is described as being wireless, it can include wired communication between at least parts of the system. Accordingly, other embodiments are within the scope of the following claims.

Claims

1. A wellbore communication system comprising:

a control sub-assembly comprising a body configured to be attached to a drill string, the body including a first control unit and a second control unit; the first control unit comprising a first processor, a first transmitter, a first receiver and a first memory, the first control unit operable to send and receive wireless signals from the surface; the second control unit comprising a second processor, a second transmitter, a second receiver and a second memory, the second control unit operable to send and receive wireless signals from the first control unit; and
one or more downhole sub-assemblies interchangeably mounted on and carried by a bottom hole assembly, each of the one or more downhole sub-assembly configured to wirelessly send and receive signals from the second control unit,
wherein the first control unit is configured to organize information received from the one or more downhole sub-assemblies, organize the information in a standard telemetry sequence, and send it to the surface.

2. The system of claim 1, wherein the second control unit is configured to receive a signal from the first control unit and determine to which of the plurality of downhole sub-assemblies to send a signal.

3. The system of claim 1, wherein the first control unit comprises:

one or more processors; and
a computer-readable medium storing instructions executable by the one or more processors to perform operations comprising: receiving, from a surface of the wellbore, instructions to perform operations within the wellbore; and transmitting, to at least one of the plurality of sub-assemblies, at least a portion of the instructions.

4. The system of claim 3, wherein the operations further comprise:

receiving, from at least one of the plurality of sub-assemblies, status signals representing a status of the at least one of the plurality of sub-assemblies; and
transmitting, to the surface of the wellbore, the status signals.

5. The system of claim 4, wherein the status signals comprise a state of a sub-assembly, the state comprising either an on state or an off state.

6. The system of claim 5, further comprising:

one or more transmitters at the surface of the wellbore, the one or more transmitters configured to transmit the instructions to the one or more processors; and
one or more receivers at the surface of the wellbore, the one or more receivers configured to receive the status signals from the one or more processors.

7. The system of claim 1, further comprising one or more repeaters configured to be positioned between the surface and the bottom hole assembly within the wellbore, the one or more repeaters configured to boost a strength of a wireless signal between the one or more transmitters or the one or more receivers and the one or more processors.

8. The system of claim 1, wherein the first control unit further comprises a power source configured to provide operating power to the one or more processors.

9. The system of claim 1, wherein the control sub-assembly is a first control sub-assembly and the system further comprises a second control sub-assembly comprising a first control unit and a second control unit.

10. A method of controlling wellbore operations, the method comprising:

receiving, by a first control unit deployed within a wellbore and mounted to a sub body and from a surface of the wellbore, instructions to perform operations within the wellbore;
transmitting, by the first control assembly, at least a portion of the instructions to a second control unit downhole of the first control unit, the second control unit mounted to the sub body;
receiving, by the second control unit, instructions to perform operations within the wellbore;
selecting, by the second control unit, to which of a plurality of downhole tools a signal should be sent; and
transmitting, by the second control assembly, at least a portion of the instructions to at least one of the plurality of downhole tools.

11. The method of claim 10, further comprising:

transmitting, by the at least one of the plurality of sub-assemblies to the second control assembly, status signals representing a status of the at least one of the plurality of sub-assemblies; and
receiving, by the first control assembly, the status signals from the at least one of the plurality of sub-assemblies.

12. The method of claim 11, further comprising transmitting, by the first control assembly to the surface of the wellbore, the status signals from the at least one of the plurality of sub-assemblies.

Referenced Cited
U.S. Patent Documents
1812044 June 1931 Grant
3335801 August 1967 Wilsey
3557875 January 1971 Solum et al.
4058163 November 15, 1977 Yandell
4384625 May 24, 1983 Roper et al.
4399873 August 23, 1983 Lindsey, Jr.
4458761 July 10, 1984 Van Vreeswyk
4482014 November 13, 1984 Allwin et al.
4646842 March 3, 1987 Arnold et al.
4674569 June 23, 1987 Revils et al.
4681159 July 21, 1987 Allwin et al.
4693328 September 15, 1987 Furse et al.
4852654 August 1, 1989 Buckner
4855820 August 8, 1989 Barbour
4944348 July 31, 1990 Whiteley et al.
4993493 February 19, 1991 Arnold
5152342 October 6, 1992 Rankin et al.
5390742 February 21, 1995 Dines et al.
5947213 September 7, 1999 Angle
6009948 January 4, 2000 Flanders et al.
RE36556 February 8, 2000 Smith
6152221 November 28, 2000 Carmicheal et al.
6163257 December 19, 2000 Tracy
6234250 May 22, 2001 Green et al.
6378628 April 30, 2002 McGuire et al.
6527066 March 4, 2003 Rives
6550534 April 22, 2003 Brett
6577244 June 10, 2003 Clark et al.
6662110 December 9, 2003 Bargach et al.
6684953 February 3, 2004 Sonnier
6691779 February 17, 2004 Sezginer et al.
6739398 May 25, 2004 Yokley et al.
6752216 June 22, 2004 Coon
6873267 March 29, 2005 Tubel et al.
6899178 May 31, 2005 Tubel
6938698 September 6, 2005 Coronado
7219730 May 22, 2007 Tilton et al.
7228902 June 12, 2007 Oppelt
7243735 July 17, 2007 Koederitz et al.
7252152 August 7, 2007 LoGiudice et al.
7278492 October 9, 2007 Braddick
7419001 September 2, 2008 Broussard
7581440 September 1, 2009 Meek
7654334 February 2, 2010 Manson
7665537 February 23, 2010 Patel et al.
7677303 March 16, 2010 Coronado
7938192 May 10, 2011 Rytlewski
7940302 May 10, 2011 Mehrotra et al.
8028767 October 4, 2011 Radford et al.
8102238 January 24, 2012 Golander et al.
8191635 June 5, 2012 Buske et al.
8237585 August 7, 2012 Zimmerman
8334775 December 18, 2012 Tapp et al.
8424605 April 23, 2013 Schultz et al.
8448724 May 28, 2013 Buske et al.
8469084 June 25, 2013 Clark et al.
8528668 September 10, 2013 Rasheed
8540035 September 24, 2013 Xu et al.
8750513 June 10, 2014 Renkis
8789585 July 29, 2014 Leising et al.
8800655 August 12, 2014 Bailey
8833472 September 16, 2014 Hay
8919431 December 30, 2014 Lott
8925213 January 6, 2015 Sallwasser
8991489 March 31, 2015 Redlinger et al.
9051792 June 9, 2015 Herberg et al.
9091148 July 28, 2015 Moffitt et al.
9121255 September 1, 2015 Themig et al.
9140100 September 22, 2015 Daccord et al.
9157294 October 13, 2015 Kleppa et al.
9187959 November 17, 2015 Treviranus et al.
9208676 December 8, 2015 Fadell et al.
9341027 May 17, 2016 Radford et al.
9494003 November 15, 2016 Carr
9506318 November 29, 2016 Brunet
9546536 January 17, 2017 Schultz et al.
20020148607 October 17, 2002 Pabst
20030001753 January 2, 2003 Cernocky et al.
20040060741 April 1, 2004 Shipalesky et al.
20040156264 August 12, 2004 Gardner et al.
20050273302 December 8, 2005 Huang et al.
20060081375 April 20, 2006 Ruttley
20060086497 April 27, 2006 Ohmer et al.
20060107061 May 18, 2006 Holovacs
20060260799 November 23, 2006 Broussard
20060290528 December 28, 2006 MacPherson et al.
20070057811 March 15, 2007 Mehta
20070107911 May 17, 2007 Miller et al.
20070187112 August 16, 2007 Eddison et al.
20070261855 November 15, 2007 Brunet
20080041631 February 21, 2008 Vail, III
20080115574 May 22, 2008 Meek
20090045974 February 19, 2009 Patel
20090050333 February 26, 2009 Smith
20090114448 May 7, 2009 Laird et al.
20090223670 September 10, 2009 Snider
20090289808 November 26, 2009 Prammer
20100097205 April 22, 2010 Script
20100101786 April 29, 2010 Lovell et al.
20100212891 August 26, 2010 Stewart et al.
20100212900 August 26, 2010 Eddison et al.
20100212901 August 26, 2010 Buytaert
20100258298 October 14, 2010 Lynde et al.
20100282511 November 11, 2010 Maranuk et al.
20110067884 March 24, 2011 Burleson et al.
20110073329 March 31, 2011 Clemens et al.
20110100645 May 5, 2011 Yapici
20110127044 June 2, 2011 Radford et al.
20110147014 June 23, 2011 Chen et al.
20110240302 October 6, 2011 Coludrovich, III
20110266004 November 3, 2011 Hallundbaek et al.
20120085540 April 12, 2012 Heijnen
20120175135 July 12, 2012 Dyer et al.
20120241154 September 27, 2012 Zhou
20120247767 October 4, 2012 Themig et al.
20120307051 December 6, 2012 Welter
20120312560 December 13, 2012 Bahr et al.
20130128697 May 23, 2013 Contant
20130153245 June 20, 2013 Knobloch et al.
20130186645 July 25, 2013 Hall
20140060844 March 6, 2014 Barbour et al.
20140083769 March 27, 2014 Moriarty et al.
20140090898 April 3, 2014 Moriarty et al.
20140126330 May 8, 2014 Shampine et al.
20140139681 May 22, 2014 Jones, Jr. et al.
20140166367 June 19, 2014 Campbell et al.
20140172306 June 19, 2014 Brannigan
20140208847 July 31, 2014 Baranov
20150027706 January 29, 2015 Symms
20150090459 April 2, 2015 Cain et al.
20150152713 June 4, 2015 Garcia et al.
20150176362 June 25, 2015 Prieto et al.
20150267500 September 24, 2015 Van Dongen et al.
20150308203 October 29, 2015 Lewis
20160160578 June 9, 2016 Lee
20160215612 July 28, 2016 Morrow
20160230508 August 11, 2016 Jensen
20160237764 August 18, 2016 Jellison et al.
20160237768 August 18, 2016 Jamison et al.
20160356152 December 8, 2016 Croux
20170074071 March 16, 2017 Tzallas et al.
20180030810 February 1, 2018 Saldanha
Foreign Patent Documents
204177988 February 2015 CN
377234 October 1989 EP
618345 October 1994 EP
2157278 February 2010 EP
2692982 May 2014 EP
2835493 February 2015 EP
2157743 October 1985 GB
2261238 December 1993 GB
2460096 November 2009 GB
2470762 December 2010 GB
2003058545 July 2003 WO
2011038170 March 2011 WO
2011095600 August 2011 WO
2011159890 December 2011 WO
2016144345 September 2016 WO
Other references
  • International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in International Application No. PCT/US2018/059167 dated Feb. 19, 2019, 14 pages.
  • Offshore, “Completions Technology: Large monobore completions prevent high-volume gas well flow restrictions”, Dec. 1, 2001, retrieved from the internet: ⋅ http://www.offshore-mag.com/articles/print/volume-61/issue-12/news/completions-technology-large-monobore-completions-prevent-high-volume-gas-well-flow-restrictions.html, 9 pages.
  • Engineers Edge—ACME Stub Threads Size Designation Table Chart, retrieved from the internet at: http://www.engineersedge.com/hardware/acme-stub-thread.htm, retrieved Feb. 27, 2017, 2 pages.
  • Engineering Innovation Worldwide, TIW XPAK Liner Hanger System brochure, 2015 TIW Corporation, Houston TX , TIW0001D Jun. 2015, retrieved form the internet at: http://www.tiwoiltools.com/Images/Interior/downloads/tiw_xpak_brochure.pdf, 4 pages.
  • Mi Swaco: A Schlumberger Company, “Intelligent Fluids Monitoring System,” available on or before Mar. 11, 2015, [retrieved May 1, 2018] retrieved from URL: <https://www.slb.com/resources/other_resources/brochures/miswaco/intelligent_fluids_monitoring_brochure.aspx>, 8 pages.
Patent History
Patent number: 10378339
Type: Grant
Filed: Nov 8, 2017
Date of Patent: Aug 13, 2019
Patent Publication Number: 20190136688
Assignee: Saudi Arabian Oil Company (Dhahran)
Inventors: Victor Carlos Costa De Oliveira (Dhahran), Ossama Sehsah (Dhahran), Mario Augusto Rivas Martinez (Dhahran)
Primary Examiner: Santiago Garcia
Application Number: 15/807,314
Classifications
Current U.S. Class: With Indicating, Testing, Measuring Or Locating (166/250.01)
International Classification: E21B 47/12 (20120101);