Process for preparation of secretory IgA and secretory IgM

A process for synthesizing and separating secretory IgA from a mixture of IgA monomer and IgA dimer is provided. The process includes covalently binding affinity tagged or epitope tagged recombinant secretory component to the IgA dimer in the mixture and binding the affinity tagged or an epitope tagged secretory IgA to immobilized moieties on the solid phase support resin to which the affinity tag or epitope tag binds and then eluting the affinity tagged or an epitope tagged secretory IgA with release buffer. A process for synthesizing and separating secretory IgM from a mixture of IgM and other plasma proteins is also provided. The process includes covalently binding affinity tagged or an epitope tagged recombinant secretory component to the IgM in the mixture and binding the affinity tagged or an epitope tagged secretory IgM to immobilized moieties on the solid phase support resin and then eluting the peptide tagged secretory IgM with a release buffer.

Skip to: Description  ·  Claims  ·  References Cited  · Patent History  ·  Patent History
Description
RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/935,417; filed Jul. 3, 2013; and a continuation-in-part of PCT application Serial No. PCT/EP2013/054697 filed Mar. 8, 2013 that in turn claims priority benefit of EP 12158931.1 filed Mar. 9, 2012 and EP 12168343.7 filed May 16, 2012; the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates in general to a process for the preparation of secretory IgA and secretory IgM from plasma proteins containing IgA and/or IgM, and in particular to a process that is scalable to allow the production of commercial quantities of medicaments containing the same.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Clostridium difficile (C. difficile) is a gram-positive anaerobic bacillus. Disease is associated with C. difficile infection.

Antibiotic associated pseudomembranous colitis results from the use of broad-spectrum antibiotic agents such as clindamycin. These antibiotics cause diarrhea in about 10% of treated patients and pseudomembranous colitis in about 1%. C. difficile causes antibiotic associated diarrhea and almost all cases of pseudomembranous colitis.

Pseudomembranous colitis results from the production of C. difficile toxin A (MW, 308,000) and toxin B (MW, 270,000) in the colon (Barroso et al., Nucleic Acids Res., 18:4004; Dove et al., Infect. Immun., 58:480-488; Lyerly et al., Clin. Microbiol. Rev., 1:1-18). Toxin A probably causes most of the gastrointestinal symptoms because of its enterotoxic activity (Lyerly et al., Infect. Immun., 35:1147-1150; Lyerly et al., Infect. Immun., 47:349-352). The toxins may act synergistically and the initial pathology caused by toxin A allows toxin B to manifest its toxicity (Lyerly et al., Infect. Immun., 47:349-352).

Most patients with C. difficile associated disease are treated effectively with vancomycin or metronidazole. Other treatment modalities include tolevemer, a toxin binding polymer (T. J. Louie et al., Clin. Infect. Dis. 2006; 43:411), and an antiparasitic medication, nitazoxanide (Med. Letter Drugs Ther. 2006; 48:89). Current treatments for C. difficile associated disease use antibiotics such as metronidazole and vancomycin. These drugs result in further disruption of the intestinal flora and are associated with a 20-25% incidence of disease relapse. Therefore, there is still a need for additional treatments of Clostridium difficile associated disease in humans.

Immunological treatment is valuable against C. difficile. Vaccination against toxins A and B stimulates active immunity against C. difficile disease in animals (Libby et al., Infect. Immun., 36:822-829).

Passive immunization is another immunological treatment against C. difficile. Serum antibodies against C. difficile have been shown to protect hamsters against C. difficile disease after oral administration. Passive immunization with bovine antibodies has been proposed as a treatment for other infectious diseases of the gastrointestinal tract, such as diseases caused by rotavirus, enteropathogenic and enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli, Vibrio cholerae, and Cryptosporidium parvum. Preliminary studies indicate that such passive immunization provides protection (Boesman-Finkelstein et al., Infect. Immun., 57:1227-1234; Brussow et al., J. Clin. Microbiol., 25:982-986; Fayer et al., Infect. Immun., 58:2962-2965; Hilpert et al., J. Infect. Dis., 156:158-166; Mietens et al., Eur. J. Pediatr., 132:239-252; Tacket et al., N. Engl. J. Med., 318:1240-1243; Yoshiyama et al., Immunology, 61:543-547).

It has been reported that bovine immunoglobulin G (IgG) concentrate from the colostrum of cows vaccinated with C. difficile toxoid protects hamsters against antibiotic associated cecitis. The hamsters were protected when treated before the onset of diarrhea but not after diarrhea began (Lyerly et al., Infection and Immunity, Vol. 59, No. 6, pages 2215-2218 (1991)). IgG directed against toxins A and B of C. difficile are present in the general population (Bacon and Fekety, Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis., 1994; 18:205-209). Human intravenous immunoglobulin derived from plasma donors has facilitated treatment in some patients, especially patients who lack circulating antibodies to the C. difficile toxins (Leung D. Y. et al., J. Pediatr. 1991 April; 118(4 (Pt 1)):633-7; Salcedo J. et al., Gut 1997; 41:366-370; Wilcox M. H., J. Antimicrob. Chemoth. 2004; 53:882-884; McPherson S. et al., Dis. Colon Rectum 2006; 49:640-645; Cone L. A. et al., Infect. Dis. Clin. Pract. 2006; 14:217-220).

In vitro experiments have demonstrated that polymeric IgA is superior to monomeric IgA and IgG in preventing C. difficile toxin damage to intestinal epithelial cell monolayers (Stubbe H. et al., J. Immunol. 2000; 164:1952-1960). Selective neutralization of C. difficile toxin by serum IgA has also been demonstrated (Johnson S. et al., Infect. Immun. 1995; 63:3166-3173).

Administration of an immunoglobulin product containing specific antibodies to C. difficile results in the elimination of C. difficile toxins and also killing of the bacteria within the colon as detailed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,773,000. Such passive immunization therefore provides an effective approach for the treatment of C. difficile associated diseases such as colitis, pseudomembranous colitis and antibiotic associated diarrhea. This is especially important for patients experiencing multiple relapses.

Oral human immunoglobulin treatment has shown efficacy in treating acute C. difficile infections. Monomeric IgA admixed with IgG (2:1) was derived from plasma (IgAbulin, Immuno, Vienna) (100 mg/mL); four mL administered orally 3 times daily for 3 weeks to a three and one-half year old child with antibiotic-associated diarrhea and C. difficile toxin A in his stools proved effective in the context of concurrent vancomycin administration. The child improved on this treatment (Tjellstrom B. et al., Lancet 1993; 341:701702). This report demonstrates the efficacy of passive immunization with IgA derived from the general population.

The isolation of secretory forms of immunoglobulins is more difficult that securing forms of a respective immunoglobulin that circulate in the blood and lack secretory component.

Thus, there exists a need for IgA and IgM therapeutics that are resistant to gastrointestinal tract degradation. There also exists a need to provide such a therapeutic in a dosing form well suited for treating an infected subject. Human plasma derived IgA and IgM has been successfully combined with recombinant secretory component to produce secretory IgA and secretory IgM with biological activity (Longet et al 2013).

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

A process for the preparation of secretory IgA and/or secretory IgM and their separation from unwanted other substances including proteins is provided. The process involves the application of an IgA source, which may contain a mixture of monomers and dimers, or a plasma protein solution containing IgM, to secretory component that is modified to contain an affinity tag or an epitope tag to form secretory IgA and/or secretory IgM containing said affinity tag or epitope tag that is useful for capture by a solid phase support resin. The protein solution which now contains the affinity tagged or epitope-tagged secretory IgA or affinity tagged or epitope-tagged secretory IgM is then applied to a solid phase support resin. The adherence of the affinity tagged or epitope tagged secretory IgA or secretory IgM to the resin and the unwanted components flow through and are thus removed. The desired product, secretory IgA or secretory IgM is then eluted from the solid phase support resin using a release agent.

For histidine and “FLAG” peptides, examples of the moieties on the solid phase support resin to which the peptide binds are immobilized divalent cations or anti polyhistidine antibodies and immobilized anti-FLAG peptide antibodies. A new composition of histidine tagged secretory IgA or secretory IgM is also provided.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1. ELISA Δ colostral secretory IgA (sIgA) and □ synthesized sIgA. Plate was coated with mouse anti-secretory component antibody.

FIG. 2. Tris acetate PAGE showing sIgA, prepared with histidine tagged secretory component eluted from nickel resin (Cube Biotech, Monheim, Germany). Lane 1: MW ladder; Lane 2: colostral secretory IgA; Lane 3 blank; Lane 4 nickel resin flow-through; Lane 5: nickel resin imidazole eluate with semisynthetic sIgA.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

The present invention has utility for the preparation of secretory IgA or secretory IgM. In some inventive embodiments, the IgA is derived from a mixture of monomeric and dimeric plasma IgA. or in other inventive embodiments, the preparation of secretory IgM is derived from a mixture of IgM with other plasma proteins. The present invention is superior to monomeric IgA or pentameric IgM administered orally because the presence of secretory component protects the IgA or IgM from digestion in the gastrointestinal tract. Without intending to be bound to particular theory, it is believed that the increased efficacy of the present invention is achieved for secretory IgA or secretory IgM owing to the propensity of monomeric IgA and pentameric IgM to degrade in the gastrointestinal tract. The resultant dosing requirements increase treatment costs. While the present invention is further detailed principally with respect to IgA, it is appreciated that the process and medicaments that result are equally applicable to IgM and the resulting secretory IgM, regardless of whether the tag is retained or removed.

An affinity tag or an epitope tag that are efficaceous for the present invention is one of: peptide tags:AviTag, a peptide allowing biotinylation by the enzyme BirA so the protein can be isolated by streptavidin; GLNDIFEAQKIEWHE (SEQ ID No. 1); calmodulin-tag, a peptide bound by the protein calmodulin (KRRWKKNFIAVSAANRFKKISSSGAL (SEQ ID No. 2); FLAG-tag, a peptide recognized by an antibody DYKDDDDK (SEQ ID No. 3); Hemaglutinin-tag, a peptide recognized by an antibody YPYDVPDYA (SEQ ID No. 4); His-tag, 5-10 histidines bound by a nickel or cobalt or other divalent cation chelate HHHHHH (SEQ ID No. 6); Myc-tag, a short peptide recognized by an antibody EQKLISEEDL (SEQ ID No. 7); S-tag KETAAAKFERQHMDS (SEQ ID No. 8); SBP-tag, a peptide which binds to streptavidin MDEKTTGWRGGHVVEGLAGELEQLRARLEHHPQGQREP (SEQ ID No. 9); Softag 1, for mammalian expression SLAELLNAGLGGS (SEQ ID No. 10); Softag 3, for prokaryotic expression TQDPSRVG (SEQ ID No. 11); V5 tag, a peptide recognized by an antibody GKPIPNPLLGLDST (SEQ ID No. 12); Xpress tag DLYDDDDK (SEQ ID No. 13); Biotin Carboxyl Carrier Protein, a protein domain recognized by streptavidin; Glutathione-S-transferase-tag, a protein which binds to immobilized glutathione; Green fluorescent protein-tag, a protein which is spontaneously fluorescent and can be bound by nanobodies; Maltose binding protein-tag, a protein which binds to amylose agarose; Nus-tag; Strep-tag, a peptide which binds to streptavidin, or the modified streptavidin called streptactin Strep-tag II: WSHPQFEK (SEQ ID No. 14); Thioredoxin-tag; TC tag; or Ty tag.

Plasma IgA contains a mixture of monomer and dimer (Delacroix et al. 1981; Delacroix et al. 1983; Longet et al. 2013). In some embodiments of the present invention, plasma dimeric IgA in the naturally occurring monomer-dimer mixture is covalently bound to recombinant peptide tagged secretory component in vitro. In other inventive embodiments native secretory component is covalently bonded to one or more amino acid residues through conventional synthetic techniques (Hermanson G T 1996). As an example using a histidine tag, it is appreciated that a single histidine residue or a poly histidine having typically between 2 and 20 histidine residues is added to secretory component, regardless of whether produced by recombinant, synthetic addition, or other technique. The secretory IgA is now histidine tagged by virtue of the divalent bonding of the histidine tagged secretory component to the IgA dimer, The novel method of obtaining purified secretory IgA that is thus formed is to remove the secretory IgA that is now tagged by affinity binding of one of the aforementioned tags to a binding moiety immobilized on a resin a or simply by a histidine residue(s) tagged to an immobilized nickel+2 resin. Alternatively, other immobilized divalent metal ions such as cobalt, zinc, copper or iron can be used. Alternatively, a FLAG peptide is used in certain inventive embodiments and antibody to the FLAG peptide is immobilized on the solid support resin. FLAG tags have been detailed elsewhere as for example U.S. Pat. No. 4,703,004. The resultant secretory IgA has utility, for example, as a treatment of C. difficile associated diseases such as Clostridium difficile colitis, pseudomembranous colitis and antibiotic associated diarrhea and in particular to secretory immunoglobulin A (IgA) compositions administered in the form of pharmaceutical compositions. The above process is equally applicable to IgM to form purified secretory IgM.

A more detailed description of an exemplary isolation of an IgA component as a byproduct from pooled human plasma or hyperimmune pooled human plasma is as follows. Ethanol fractionation of pooled human plasma is a well-known process to prepare immunoglobulin G. Pooled human plasma is first obtained from licensed plasmapheresis centers in the United States and tested for various pathogens including the HIV virus. The first manufacturing step of most commercial immunoglobulin G preparations involves a modified cold ethanol fractionation according to Cohn to produce Cohn fraction II. In the fractionation process, many infectious viruses are eliminated from the pooled human plasma. Following fractionation, the Cohn fraction II is subjected to adsorption onto an ion exchange medium. This step may selectively reduce the IgA concentration to less than 0.1%. Such a step is important for producing immunoglobulin G for intravenous infusion into humans. This is because some individuals undergo an anaphylactic-like reaction if treated with intravenous IgG that contains IgA as an impurity.

The modified cold ethanol fractionation process according to Cohn is a series of fractionations using various levels of ethanol, pH, and temperature to produce a fraction II which is further treated to produce immunoglobulins as described above. In the fractionation process, pooled human plasma is first treated to produce a cryoprecipitate and cryo-supernatant. Alternatively, it is appreciated that the source plasma may be autologous plasma or hyperimmune human plasma, either pooled, or from a single individual who has been immunized against a specific disease.

In another embodiment, the IgA component is be prepared by hybridoma techniques to provide antigen-specific IgA. Hybridoma techniques are described originally in Kohler and Milstein, Nature 1975; 256:495-497 with more recent advances summarized in Berzofsky et al., Fundamental Immunology, Third Edition, 1993, pp 455-62.

Regardless of the source, the cryo-supernatant is subjected to a first ethanol fractionation to yield a supernatant I. Supernatant I is subjected to a second ethanol fractionation to yield fraction II+III. Fraction II+III is subjected to a third ethanol fractionation procedure to yield a supernatant III and Fraction III precipitate.

The fraction III precipitate enriched in IgA is generally discarded as an unwanted byproduct. According to the present invention, this unwanted IgA following ion exchange adsorption purification is further treated by incubation with immobilized hydrolases to inactivate viruses and vasoactive substances. Such treatment has been proven to eliminate many viruses tested including HIV, Sindbis, and vaccinia. Other antiviral treatments, as known to those skilled in the art, are used in combination and consist of solvent detergent processes, nanofiltration and/or heat inactivation. Usually three antiviral steps are implemented. Following incubation to remove viruses, the concentration of the active material is adjusted with sterile saline or buffered solutions to ensure a constant amount of active material per milliliter of reconstituted product. Finally, the solution with a constant amount of reconstituted product is sterilized by filtration before use.

The ethanol fractionation process according to Cohn is well known in the art and is described in Cohn et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1946; 68:459-475, Oncley et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1949; 71:541-550, and in most detail in pages 576-602, Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, Vol. 3, second edition (1963). Alternatively, ion exchange chromatography may be used to obtain the dimeric and polymeric IgA byproduct during the manufacture of intravenous immunoglobulin. From 4% to 22% of plasma IgA is dimeric and polymeric IgA (Delacroix et al. 1981; Delacroix et al. 1983). The resulting dimeric IgA-J chains are purified to form a medicament.

The dimeric and polymeric IgA present in the plasma IgA monomer-polymer mixture is further coupled to secretory component that is recombinantly produced to include a histidine tag or another of the aforementioned tags; or subsequently covalently bonded to a peptide tag such as histidine or poly-histine oligopeptide. In certain inventive embodiments, the coupling of IgA to secretory component is accomplished by forming disulfide bonds under mildly oxidizing conditions. (Jones R. M. L., Schweikart F., Frutiger S., Jaton J-C., Hughes G. J. Thiol-disulfide redox buffers maintain a structure of immunoglobulin A that is essential for optimal in vitro binding to secretory component. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1998; 1429:265-274.) Dimeric and polymeric IgA containing both J chain and secretory component is purified from the mixture by immobilized metal ion affinity chromatography, as performed by those of skill in the art of protein purification.

It has been previously found that it is possible to separate recombinant proteins from cell supernates by producing such proteins with histidine tails or other of the aforementioned tags and then passing the cell supernates through nickel bound solid support resins. The histidine or other tag adheres to the nickel or other suitable tag specific binding moiety and is retained while the unwanted proteins are washed through. The tagged secretory immunoglobulin protein is then recovered by eluting it with an imidazole buffer in the case of an amide-metal bond between target protein and resin (Block H et al 2009).

The mixture of histidine tagged secretory IgA and residual monomeric IgA is buffer exchanged into a binding buffer containing low concentrations of imidazole (≤40 mM). Another release agent operative to exchange histidine tagged secretory IgA or secretory IgM illustratively includes 1) ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA) at 10 mM and 2) an elution buffer of pH 5.5 or lower. Typical binding buffer imidazole concentrations range from 0.1 to 100 millimolar (mM). It is appreciated that the initial binding buffer pH is somewhat variable and readily discerned for a given chemical structure of buffer and concentration through routine experimentation. The chromatography medium operative herein is selected to be stable in the presence of the binding buffer and able to separate histidine tagged secretory IgA. Suitable media illustratively include Exemplary of these media are nickel, cobalt and zinc immobilized on sepharose. In a preferred embodiment, the affinity medium is washed in a wash buffer containing from 0 to 100 mM imidazole to remove unbound monomeric IgA. The bound histidine tagged secretory IgA is recovered using an elution buffer of a higher imidazole concentration (e.g. 100 to 1000 mM). With succesive elutions separation of monomeric from histidine tagged secretory component bound dimeric IgA is exacted. It is appreciated thate the inventive process is amenable to scaling to produce quantities sufficient to treat numerous subjects. It is appreciated that similar selective binding pairs is achieved between other inventive tagged secretory component containing immunoglobulin proteins and resins are convetional to the art for each of the aforementioned tags.

By way of a specific example, the binding and wash buffers are 50 mM NaH2PO4 300 mM NaCl and 20 mM imidazole, is adjusted to pH 8. The mixture of IgA monomer and secretory IgA is dissolved in that buffer. The elution buffer is identical to the binding buffer with the exception that the imidazole is at a higher concentration, e.g 100 to 1000 mM.

The remaining histidine tagged secretory IgA is then eluted from the divalent immobilized metal resin with the elution buffer according to conventional techniques and conditions that include an exemplary basic pH of for example 8 to 10, see FIGS. 1 and 2.

Purified secretory IgA containing histidine tagged secretory component is stabilized in some embodiments for example by the addition of human serum albumin to a final concentration of 5% total weight albumen.

In another embodiment, the tag is removed from the recovered secretroy IgA and native secretory IgA is available for usage as a medicament. For a histidine tagged secretory IgA a procedure for tag removal is known to the art (Kopera E et al 2012).

In summary, the inventive process is the addition of tagged secretory component in either recombinatant or post expression tagging to a mixture of plasma derived IgA monomers and dimers, in which the tagged secretory component combines with the IgA dimer forming secretory IgA and allows recovery of the newly formed secretory IgA by adhesion to immobilized divalent metal ions or other solid phase moeity, and subsequent elution therefrom.

Plasma IgM can be recovered from the byproducts of the production of intravenous immunoglobulin. An example of such a byproduct is Cohn fraction III preciptate. The IgM is most easily solublized from Cohn fraction III preciptate by 20 mM socium acetate. Other plasma proteins are similarly solublized along with the IgM. The plasma IgM in this protein mixture is covalently bound to recombinant histidine tagged secretory component in vitro forming secretory IgM within the protein mixture. The secretory IgM is now tagged by virtue of the divalent bonding of the tagged secretory component to the IgM. The novel method of obtaining purified secretory IgM that is thus formed is to remove the secretory IgM that is now tagged by affinity binding of the tag to a immobilized nickel+2 or other divalent metal ion or other suitable binding moiety conventional to the art that is part of a resin column. The resultant semisynthetic secretory IgM has utility, for example, as a treatment of Clostridium difficile associated diseases such as Clostridium difficile colitis, pseudomembranous colitis and antibiotic associated diarrhea and in particular to secretory immunoglobulin M compositions administered in the form of pharmaceutical compositions.

In another embodiment, the tag is removed from the recovered secretory IgM and native secretory IgM is available for usage as a medicament. For a histidine tagged secretoty IgM a procedure for tag removal is known to the art (Kopera E et al 2012).

Thus, an inventive process provides the addition of peptide tagged secretory component to a mixture of plasma derived IgM and other plasma proteins, in which the peptide tagged secretory component combines with the IgM forming secretory IgM and allows recovery of the newly formed secretory IgM by adhesion to moieties on the solid phase support resin to which the peptide binds, and subsequent elution therefrom using an elution buffer.

REFERENCES

  • Aoyama K, Chiba J. Separation of different molecular forms of mouse IgA and IgM monoclonal antibodies by high-performance liquid chromatography on spherical hydroxyapatite beads. J Immunol Methods. 1993; 162(2):201-10.
  • Bacon A. E. 3rd, Fekety R. Immunoglobulin G directed against toxins A and B of Clostridium difficile in the general population and patients with antibiotic-associated diarrhea. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 1994; 18:205-209.
  • Barroso L. A., Wang S. Z., Phelps C. J., Johnson J. L., Wilkins T. D. Nucleotide sequence of Clostridium difficile toxin B gene. Nucleic Acids Res. 1990; 18:4004.
  • Berzofsky J. A., Berkower I. J., Epstein S. L., Monoclonal Antibodies in Chapter 12, Antigen-Antibody Interactions and Monoclonal Antibodies, pp. 455-465 in Fundamental Immunology, Third Edition, W. E. Paul (ed), Raven Press, NY 1993. Berzofsky et al., Fundamental Immunology, Third Edition, 1993, pp 455-462.
  • Block H, Maertens B, Spriestersbach A, Brinker N, Kubicek J, Fabis R, Labahn J, Schafer F. Immobilized-Metal Affinity Chromatography (IMAC): A Review. CHAPTER 27 in Methods in Enzymology, Volume 463, 2009.
  • Boesman-Finkelstein M., Walton N. E., Finkelstein R. A. Bovine lactogenic immunity against cholera toxin-related enterotoxins and Vibrio cholerae outer membranes. Infect. Immun. 1989; 57:1227-1234.
  • Brussow H., Hilpert H., Walther I., Sidoti J., Mietens C., Bachmann P. Bovine milk immunoglobulins for passive immunity to infantile rotavirus gastroenteritis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1987; 25:982-986.
  • Cohn E. J., Strong L. E., Hughes W. L., Jr., Mulford D. J., Ashworth J. N., Melin M., Taylor H. L., Preparation and Properties of Serum and Plasma Proteins IV. A System for the Separation into Fractions of the Protein and Lipoprotein Components of Biological Tissues and Fluids, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1946; 68; 459-475.
  • Cone L. A., Lopez C., Tarleton H. L., Jodoin D., Taylor M., Gade-Andavolu R., Dreisbach L. P. A durable response to relapsing Clostridium difficile colitis may require combined therapy with high-dose oral vancomycin and intravenous immune globulin. Infect. Dis. Clin. Pract. 2006; 14:217-220.
  • Corthesy B., Recombinant Secretory IgA for Immune Intervention Against Mucosal Pathogens, Biochem. Soc. Trans. 1997, 25; 471-475.
  • Corthier et al., Emergence in Gnotobiotic Mice of Nontoxinogenic Clones of clostridium difficile from a Toxinogenic One, Infection and Immunity, June 1988, pp. 1500-1504.
  • Corthier et al., Protection Against Experimental Pseudomembranous Colitis in Gnotobiotic Mice by Use of Monoclonal Antibodies Against clostridium difficile Toxin A, Infection and Immunity, March 1991, pp. 1192-1195.
  • Crottet P., Cottet S., Corthesy B., Expression, Purification and Biochemical Characterization of Recombinant Murine Secretory Component, A Novel Tool in Mucosal Immunology, Biochem. J. 1999, 341; 299-306.
  • Delacroix D. L., Hodgson H. J., McPherson A., Dive C., Vaerman J. P. Selective transport of polymeric immunoglobulin A in bile. Quantitative relationships of monomeric and polymeric immunoglobulin A, immunoglobulin M, and other proteins in serum, bile, and saliva. J. Clin. Invest. 1982 August; 70(2):230-41
  • Delacroix D. L., Elkom K. B., Geubel A. P., Hodgson H. F., Dive C., Vaerman J. P. Changes in size, subclass, and metabolic properties of serum immunoglobulin A in liver diseases and in other diseases with high serum immunoglobulin A. J. Clin. Invest. 1983 February; 71(2):358-67.
  • Dove C. H., Wang S. Z., Price S. B., Phelps C. J., Lyerly D. M., Wilkins T. D. and Johnson J. L.; Lyerly et al. Molecular characterization of the Clostridium difficile toxin A gene. Infect. Immun. 1990; 58:480-488.
  • Ehrich et al., Production of clostridium difficile Antitoxin, Infection and Immunity, June 1980, pp. 1041-1043.
  • Fayer R., Guidry A., Blagburn B. L. Immunotherapeutic efficacy of bovine colostral immunoglobulins from a hyperimmunized cow against cryptosporidiosis in neonatal mice. Infect. Immun., 1990; 58:2962-2965.
  • Gerding et al., clostridium difficile-Associated Diarrhea, Archives of Internal Medicine, vol. 146, Jan. 1986, pp. 95-100.
  • Hermanson G T. Bioconjugate Techniques. Academic Press, San Diego 1996.
  • Hilpert H., Brussow H., Mietens C., Sidoti J., Lerner L., Werchau H. Use of bovine milk concentrate containing antibody to rotavirus to treat rotavirus gastroenteritis in infants. J. Infect. Dis. 1987; 156:158-166.
  • Johnson S. et al. Infect. Immun. 1995; 63:3166-3173.
  • Jones R. M. L., Schweikart F., Frutiger S., Jaton J-C., Hughes G. J. Thiol-disulfide redox buffers maintain a structure of immunoglobulin A that is essential for optimal in vitro binding to secretory component. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1998; 1429:265-274.
  • Kelly et al., clostridium difficile Colitis, New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 330, January 1994, pp. 257-262.
  • Kelly et al., Human Colonic Aspirates Containing Immunoglobulin A Antibody to clostridium difficile Toxin A Inhibit Toxin A—Receptor Binding, Gastroenterology, vol. 102, No. 1, pp. 35-40.
  • Kohler G., Milstein C., Continuous Cultures of Fused Cells Secreting Antibody of Predetermined Specificity, Nature 1975; 256; 495-497.
  • Kopera E, Belczyk-Ciesielska A, Bal W. Application of Ni(II)-assisted peptide bond hydrolysis to non-enzymatic affinity tag removal. PLoS One. 2012; 7(5):e36350. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036350. Epub 2012 May 4.
  • Leung D. Y., Kelly C. P., Boguniewicz M., Pothoulakis C., LaMont J. T., Flores A. Treatment with intravenously administered gamma globulin of chronic relapsing colitis induced by Clostridium difficile toxin. J. Pediatr. 1991 April; 118(4 (Pt 1)):633-637.
  • Libby J. M., Jortner B. S., Wilkins T. D. Effects of the two toxins of Clostridium difficile in antibiotic-associated cecitis in hamsters. Infect. Immun. 1982 May; 36(2):822-829.
  • Lima et al., Effects of clostridium difficile Toxins A and B in Rabbit Small and Large Intestine In Vivo and on Cultured Cells In Vitro, Infection and Immunity, March 1988, pp. 582-588.
  • Longet S, Miled S, Lotscher M, Miescher S M, Zuercher A W, Corthésy B. Human plasma-derived polymeric IgA and IgM antibodies associate with secretory component to yield biologically active secretory-like antibodies. J Biol Chem. 2013 Feb. 8; 288:4085-94.
  • Louie T. J., Peppe J., Watt C. K., Johnson D., Mohammed R., Dow G., Weiss K., Simon S., John J. F. Jr., Garber G., Chasan-Taber S., Davidson D. M.; Tolevamer Study Investigator Group. Tolevamer, a novel nonantibiotic polymer, compared with vancomycin in the treatment of mild to moderately severe Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2006; 43:411-20.
  • Luellau, E., von Stockar, U., Vogt, S., Freitag, R. Development of a downstream process for the isolation and separation of monoclonal immunoglobulin A monomers, dimers and polymers from cell culture supernatant, Journal of Chromatography A, 1998, 796:165-175.
  • Lullau E., Heyse S., Vogel H., Marison I., von Stockar U., Kraehanbuhl J-P., Corthesy B., Antigen Binding Properties of Purified Immunoglulin A Antibodies, J. Biol. Chem. 1996; 271:16300-16309.
  • Lyerly D. M., Krivan H. C., Wilkins T. D. Clostridium difficile: its disease and toxins. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 1988; 1:1-18.
  • Lyerly D. M., Phelps C. J., Toth J., Wilkins T. D. Characterization of toxins A and B of Clostridium difficile with monoclonal antibodies. Infect. Immun. 1986; 54:70-76.
  • Lyerly D. M., Bostwick E. F., Binion S. B., Wilkins T. D. Passive immunization of hamsters against disease caused by Clostridium difficile by use of bovine immunoglobulin G concentrate. Infect. Immun. 1991; 59:2215-2218.
  • Lyerly D. M., Lockwood D. E., Richardson S. H., Wilkins T. D. Biological activities of toxins A and B of Clostridium difficile. Infect. Immun. 1982; 35:1147-1150.
  • Lyerly D. M., Saum K. E., MacDonald D. K., Wilkins T. D. Effects of Clostridium difficile toxins given intragastrically to animals. Infect. Immun. 1985; 47:349-352.
  • Mahe et al., Effect of Various Diets on Toxin Production by Two Strains of clostridium difficile in Gnotobiotic Mice, Infection and Immunity, August 1987, pp. 1801-1805.
  • Martinez et al., Purification and Characterization of clostridium sordellii Hemorrhagic Toxin and Cross-Reactivity with clostridium difficile Toxin A (Enterotoxin), Infection and Immunity, May 1988, pp. 12-15-1221.
  • McFarland et al., Nosocomial Acquisition of clostridium difficile Infection, The New England Journal of Medicine, January 1989, pp. 204-210.
  • McFarland et al., Review of clostridium difficile Associated Diseases, American Journal of Infection Control, vol. 14, No. 3, June 1986, pp. 99-104.
  • McPherson S., Rees C. J., Ellis R., Soo S. and Panter S. J. Intravenous Immunoglobulin for the Treatment of Severe, Refractory, and Recurrent Clostridium difficile Diarrhea. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum. 2006; 49(5):640-645.
  • Med. Letter Drugs Ther. 2006; 48:89-90,92.
  • Mietens C., Keinhorst H., Hilpert H., Gerber H., Amster H., Pahud J. J. Treatment of infantile E. coli gastroenteritis with specific bovine anti-E. coli milk immunoglobulins. Eur. J. Pediatr. 1979; 132:239-252.
  • Mitchell et al., Effect of Toxin A and B of clostridium difficile on Rabbit Ileum and Colon, Gut, 1986, vol. 27, pp. 78-85.
  • Morris et al., Role of Surgery in Antibiotic-Induced Pseudomembranous Enterocolitis, The American Journal of Surgery, vol. 160, November 1990, pp. 535-539.
  • Oncley J. L., Melin M., Richert D. A., Cameron J. W., Gross P. M., Jr., The Separation of the Antibodies, Isoagglutinins, Prothrombin, Plasminogen and β1-Lipoprotein into Subfractions of Human Plasma. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1949; 71:541-550.
  • Pothoulakis C., LaMont J. T., Eglow R., Gao N., Rubins J. B., Theoharides T. C., Dickey B. F. Characterization of rabbit ileal receptors for Clostridium difficile toxin A. Evidence for a receptor-coupled G protein. J. Clin. Invest. 1991; 88:119-25.
  • Rothman et al., Differential Cytotoxic Effects of Toxins A and B Isolated from clostridium difficile, Infection and Immunity, November 1984, pp. 324-331.
  • Salcedo J. et. al. Gut 1997; 41:366-370.
  • Strong L. E., Blood Fractionation, pp. 576-602 in vol. 3, Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology. Second Edition, H. F. Mark, J. J. McKetta, D. F. Othmer (eds), Interscience Publishers, NY 1963, pp. 576-602.
  • Stubbe H. et al. J. Immunol. 2000; 164:1952-1960.
  • Symersky J., Novak J., McPherson D. T., DeLucas L., Mestecky J. Expression of the recombinant human immunoglobulin J chain in Escherichia coli. Mol. Immunol. 2000; 37:133-140.
  • Tacket C. O., Losonsky G., Link H., Hoang Y., Guesry P., Hilpert H., Levine M. M. Protection by milk immunoglobulin concentrate against oral challenge with enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli. N. Engl. J. Med. 1988; 318:1240-3.
  • Tjellstrom B., Stenhammar L., Eriksson S., Magnusson K. E. Oral immunoglobulin A supplement in treatment of Clostridium difficile enteritis. Lancet 1993; 341(8846):701-702.
  • Triadafilopoulos et al., Differential Effects of clostridium difficile Toxins A and B on Rabbit Ileum, Gastroenterology, 1987, vol. 93, pp. 273-279.
  • Tucker et al., Toxin A of clostridium difficile Is a Potent Cytotoxin, Journal of
  • Clinical Microbiology, May 1990, pp. 869-871.
  • Weltzin R., Traina-Dorge V., Soike K., Zhang J. Y., Mack P., Soman G., Drabik G., Monath T. P., Intranasal Monoclonal IgA Antibody against Respiratory Syncytial Virus Protects Rhesus Monkeys against Upper and Lower Respiratory Tract Infection. J. Infect. Dis. 1996; 174:256-261.
  • Weltzin R., Hsu S. A., Mittler E. S., Georgakopoulas K., Monath T. P., Intranasal Monoclonal Immunoglobulin A against Respiratory Synctial Virus Protects against Upper and Lower Respiratory Tract Infections in Mice. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1994; 38:2785-2791.
  • Wilcox M. H. J. Antimicrob. Chemoth. 2004; 53:882-884.
  • Yoshiyama Y., Brown W. R. Specific antibodies to cholera toxin in rabbit milk are protective against Vibrio cholerae-induced intestinal secretion. Immunology. 1987; 61:543-547.

Patent applications and publications mentioned in the specification are indicative of the levels of those skilled in the art to which the invention pertains. These applications and publications are incorporated herein by reference to the same extent as if each individual application or publication was specifically and individually incorporated herein by reference.

The foregoing description is illustrative of particular embodiments of the invention, but is not meant to be a limitation upon the practice thereof. The following claims, including all equivalents thereof, are intended to define the scope of the invention.

Claims

1. A process for synthesizing a secretory IgM therapeutic by separating a pentameric IgM including J chain and mixed with other proteins in a protein mixture comprising:

adding secretory component in solution that is tagged with an affinity or epitope tag selected from the group consisting of polyhistidine, AviTag, calmodulin-tag, FLAG-tag, hemaglutinin-tag, Myc-tag, S-tag, SBP-tag, Softag 1, Softag 3, V5 tag, Xpress tag, biotin carboxyl carrier protein, glutathione-S-transferase-tag, green fluorescent protein-tag, maltose binding protein-tag, Nus-tag; Strep-tag, thioredoxin-tag; TC tag, and Ty tag; to the protein mixture, the protein mixture containing the pentameric IgM including the J chain, facilitating the covalent binding of the affinity or epitope tagged secretory component to the pentameric IgM to produce the secretory IgM therapeutic;
exposing the protein mixture to a binding moiety immobilized on a solid phase resin under conditions that the secretory IgM therapeutic binds to the solid phase resin by interaction between the affinity or epitope tagged secretory component and the binding moiety;
washing the unbound protein mixture less the secretory IgM therapeutic from the solid phase support; and
then eluting the secretory IgM therapeutic with a release buffer from the solid phase support by the release buffer interfering with the interaction between the affinity or epitope tagged secretory component and the binding moiety.

2. The process of claim 1 wherein the secretory component is human.

3. The process of claim 1 wherein the affinity or epitope tag is removed from secretory IgM after the eluting step.

4. The process of claim 1 wherein the moiety on the solid phase support resin to which the affinity or epitope tag binds is a divalent cation.

5. The process of claim 1 wherein the secretory component is recombinant.

6. The process of claim 1 wherein the affinity or epitope tag is a polyhistidine.

7. The process of claim 1 wherein IgA has been removed from the plasma protein mixture before the epitope or affinity tagged secretory component is added.

8. The process of claim 1 further comprising stabilizing the secretory IgM therapeutic by adding human serum albumin.

9. A process for synthesizing a secretory IgM therapeutic by separating pentameric IgM including J chain and mixed with other proteins comprising:

adding secretory component in solution that is tagged with an affinity or epitope tag selected from the group consisting of polyhistidine, AviTag, calmodulin-tag, FLAG-tag, hemaglutinin-tag, Myc-tag, S-tag, SBP-tag, Softag 1, Softag 3, V5 tag, Xpress tag, biotin carboxyl carrier protein, glutathione-S-transferase-tag, green fluorescent protein-tag, maltose binding protein-tag, Nus-tag; Strep-tag, thioredoxin-tag; TC tag, and Ty tag; to the protein mixture, the protein mixture obtained from human plasma containing the pentameric IgM including the J chain, facilitating the covalent binding of the affinity or epitope tagged secretory component to the pentameric IgM containing the J chain to produce the secretory IgM therapeutic;
exposing the protein mixture to a binding moiety immobilized on a solid phase resin under conditions that the secretory IgM therapeutic binds to the solid phase resin by interaction between the affinity or epitope tagged secretory component and a binding moiety;
washing the unbound protein mixture less the secretory IgM therapeutic from the solid phase support; and
then eluting the secretory IgM therapeutic with a release buffer from the solid phase support by the release buffer interfering with the interaction between the affinity or epitope tagged secretory component and the binding moiety.

10. An improved process for synthesizing a secretory IgM therapeutic from a protein mixture of plasma proteins containing plasma derived IgM containing J chain, by adding secretory component that is tagged with an affinity or epitope tag to the protein mixture forming the secretory IgM therapeutic in the protein mixture wherein the improvement comprises: recovering the secretory IgM therapeutic from the protein mixture by adhesion to moieties on a solid phase support resin to which the affinity or epitope tag binds, and subsequent eluting the secretory IgM therapeutic using an elution buffer.

11. The improved process of claim 10 wherein the secretory component is human.

12. The improved process of claim 10 wherein the protein mixture is obtained from human plasma.

13. The improved process of claim 10 wherein the affinity or epitope tag is removed from the secretory IgM therapeutic prior to administration to a patient.

14. The improved process of claim 10 wherein the moieties on the solid phase support resin to which the affinity or epitope tag binds is a divalent cation.

15. The improved process of claim 10 further comprising washing unbound plasma proteins including unbound immunoglobulins lacking the J chain through the resin prior to the eluting the secretory IgM therapeutic.

16. The improved process of claim 10 wherein the secretory component is recombinant.

17. The improved process of claim 10 wherein the affinity or epitope is histidine or polyhistidine and is coupled to the secretory component in vitro.

18. The improved process of claim 10 wherein the plasma derived IgM containing J chain is pentameric IgM.

Referenced Cited
U.S. Patent Documents
4703004 October 27, 1987 Hopp et al.
5773000 June 30, 1998 Bostwick et al.
7597891 October 6, 2009 Simon
7794721 September 14, 2010 Simon
8021645 September 20, 2011 Simon et al.
20020110555 August 15, 2002 Lee
20150056180 February 26, 2015 Corthesy
Foreign Patent Documents
0839915 May 1998 EP
2636692 September 2013 EP
H03204822 September 1991 JP
2005500265 January 2005 JP
2005501102 January 2005 JP
2011523410 August 2011 JP
WO9820141 May 1998 WO
9857993 December 1998 WO
02076502 October 2002 WO
2011131786 October 2011 WO
WO 2013132052 September 2013 WO
Other references
  • Bouvet et al. “Secretory comonent-binding properties of normal serum IgM” Scand. J. Immunol. 31, 437-441, 1990.
  • Underdown et al. “Isolation of human secretory component by affinity chromatography on IgM-sepharose” Immunochemistry, 14, pp. 111-118, 1977.
  • Jones et al. “Purification of polymeric immunoglobulin from cell culture superntants by affintiy chromatogrpahy using secretory component” J Immunol Methods. 1987, 104(1-2): 237-43.
  • Corthey, Blaise and Rindisbacher, Lorenz, “In Vitro Assembly of Secretory Immunoglobulin A (sIGA) From IGA and Recombinant Secretory Component”, J. Cell. Biochem. Suppl. 19A (1995), pp. 231-267, Keystone Symposium. Mucosal Immunity: New Strategies for Protection Against Viral and Bacterial Pathogens. Keystone, Colorado, Jan. 16-23, 1995, Abstracts, p. 244; DOI: 10.1002/jcb.240591008.
  • Rindisbacher, Lorenz et al., “Production of Human Secretory Component with Dimeric IgA Binding Capacity Using Viral Expression Systems”, The Journal of Biological Chemistry, Jun. 9, 1995, pp. 14220-14228, vol. 270, Issue 23, Copyright The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc. (1995); DOI: 10.1074/ jbc.270.23.14220.
  • Lullau, Elke et al., “Antigen Binding Properties of Purified Immunoglobulin A and Reconstituted Secretory Immunoglobulin A Antibodies”, The Journal of Biological Chemistry, Jul. 5, 1996, pp. 16300-16309, vol. 271, Issue 27, Copyright The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc. (1996); doi: 10.1074/ jbc.271.27.16300; http://www.jbc.org/content/271/27/16300.full.pdf.
  • Hendrickson, Barbara et al., “Lack of Association of Secretory Component with IgA in J Chain-Deficient Mice”, The Journal of Immunology, Jul. 15, 1996, , pp. 750-754, vol. 157, Issue 2, Copyright The American Association of Immunologists (1996); http://www.jimmunol.org/content/157/2/750.long.
  • Corthesy, Blaise et al., “A Pathogen-specific Epitope Inserted into Recombinant Secretory Immunoglobulin A is Immunogenic by the Oral Route,” The Journal of Biochemistry, Dec. 27, 1996, pp. 33670-33677, vol. 271, Issue 52, Copyright The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc. (1996); DOI: 10.1074/ JBC.271.52.33670; http://www.jbc.org/content/271/52/33670.full.pdf.
  • Crottet, Pascal and Corthesy, Blaise, “Secretory Component Delays the Conversion of Secretory IgA into Antigen-Binding Competent F(ab′)2: A Possible Implication for Mucosal Defense”, The Journal of Immunology, Nov. 15, 1998, pp. 5445-5453, vol. 161, Issue 10, Copyright The American Association of Immunologists (1998); http://www.jimmunol.org/content/jimmunol/161/10/5445.full.pdf.
  • Berdoz, Jose et al., “In vitro comparison of the antigen-binding and stability properties of the various molecular forms of IgA antibodies assembled and produced in CHO cells”, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., Mar. 1999, pp. 3029-3034, vol. 96, Issue 6; DOI: 10.1073/PNAS.96.6.3029; http://www.pnas.org/content/pnas/96/6/3029.full.pdf.
  • Crottet, Pascal and Corthesy, Blaise, “Mapping the Interaction Between Murine IgA and Murine Secretory Component Carrying Epitope Substitutions Reveals a Role of Domains II and III in Covalent Binding to IgA”, The Journal of Biological Chemistry, Oct. 29, 1999, pp. 31456-31462, vol. 274, Issue 44, Copyright The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc. (1999); DOI: 10.1074/jbc.274.44.31456; http://www.jbc.org/content/274/44/31456.full.pdf.
  • Corthesy, Blaise and Spertini, Francois, “Secretory Immunoglobulin A: from Mucosal Protection to Vaccine Development”, Biological Chemistry, Nov. 1999, pp. 1251-1262, vol. 380, Issue 11, Copyright Walter de Gruyter—Berlin—NewYork (1999); DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/BC.1999.160.
  • Corthesy, Blaise and Phalipon, Armelle, “Molecular Definition of the Role of Secretory Component in Secretory IgA-Mediated Protection at Mucosal Surfaces” (abstract), Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Jan. 1, 2002, p. S113, vol. 109, Issue 1; DOI: 10.1016/S0091-6749(02)81452-X.
  • Phalipon, Armelle et al., “Secretory Component: A New Role in Secretory IgA-Mediated Immune Exclusion In Vivo”, Immunity, Jul. 2002, pp. 107-115, vol. 17, Issue 1, Copyright Cell Press (2002); DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1074-7613(02)00341-2;http://www.cell.com/immunity/pdf/S1074-7613(02)00341-2.pdf.
  • Phalipon, Armelle and Corthesy, Blaise, “Novel functions of the polymeric Ig receptor: well beyond transport of immunoglobulins”, Trends in Immunology, Feb. 2003, pp. 55-58, vol. 24, Issue 2, Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. (2002); DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1471-4906(02)00031-5;www.elsevier.com.
  • Corthesy, Blaise, “Recombinant Secretory Immunoglobulin A in Passive Immunotherapy: Linking Immunology and Biotechnology”, Current Pharmaceutical Biotechnology (2003), pp. 51-67, vol. 4, Issue 1, Copyright Bentham Science Publishers Ltd. (2003); DOI:10.2174/1389201033378020; http://www.eurekaselect.com/63587/article.
  • Favre, Laurent I. et al., “Simplified procedure to recover recombinant antigenized secretory IgA to be used as a vaccine vector”, Journal of Chromatography B, Mar. 25, 2003, pp. 143-151, vol. 786, Issues 1-2, Copyright Elsevier Science B.V. (2002); DOI: 10.1016/S1570-0232(02)00723-7; www.elsevier.com.
  • Kunisawa, J. and Kiyono, H., “A marvel of mucosal T cells and secretory antibodies for the creation of first lines of defense”, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, Jun. 2005, pp. 1308-1321, vol. 62, Copyright Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel (2005); DOI: 10.1007/s00018-005-5035-1.
  • Bonner, Alexandra et al., “Solution structure of recombinant human secretory component and its two- and three-domain fragments by scattering, ultracentrifugation and constrained modeling” (abstract), Molecular Immunology, Jan. 2007, p. 156, vol. 44, Issue 1; DOI:10.1016/j.molimm.2006.07.026.
  • Bonner, Alexandra et al., “Solution Structure of Human Secretory Component and Implications for Biological Function”, The Journal of Biological Chemistry, Jun. 8, 2007, pp. 16969-16980, vol. 282, Issue 23, Copyright The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc. (2007); DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M701281200; http://www.jbc.org/content/282/23/16969.full.pdf.
  • Wheeler, Thomas T. et al., “Immune Components of Colostrum and Milk—A Historical Perspective”, Journal of Mammary Gland Biology and Neoplasia, Dec. 2007 (Published Online: Nov. 9, 2007), pp. 237-247, vol. 12, Issue 4, Copyright Springer Science + Business Media, LLC (2007); DOI: 10.1007/s10911-007-9051-7.
  • Corthesy, Blaise, “Role of secretory immunoglobulin A and secretory component in the protection of mucosal surfaces”, Future Microbiology, May 2010, pp. 817-829, vol. 5, Issue 5, Copyright Future Medicine Ltd (2010); DOI: 10.2217/FMB.10.39.
  • European Search Report dated Aug. 1, 2012 for European Application No. 12158931 filed Mar. 9, 2012 (references same as ISR dated Apr. 18, 2013).
  • Crottet, P. et al., “Expression, purification and biochemical characterization of recombinant murine secretory component: a novel tool in mucosal immunology”, Biochem. J., 1999, pp. 299-306, vol. 341, © 1999 Biochemical Society.
  • Stubbe, H. et al., “Polymeric IgA is Superior to Monomeric IgA and IgG Carrying the Same Variable Domain in Preventing Clostridium difficile Toxin A Damaging of T84 Monolayers”, The Journal of Immunology, 2000, pp. 1952-1960, vol. 164, Copyright © 2000 by The American Association of Immunologists; DOI: 10.4049/ immuno1.164.4.1952.
  • Symersky, J. et al., “Expression of the recombinant human immunoglobulin J chain in Escherichia coli”, Molecular Immunology, 2000, pp. 133-140, vol. 37, © 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd.
  • Wilcox, M.H., “Descriptive study of intravenous immunoglobulin for the treatment of recurrent Clostridium difficile diarrhoea”, Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 2004 (Advance Access publication Apr. 8, 2004), pp. 882-884, vol. 53, No. 5, © The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 2004; DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkh176.
  • Marietta, E. et al., “A new model for dermatitis herpetiformis that uses HLA-DQ8 transgenic NOD mice”, The Journal of Clinical Investigation, Oct. 2004, pp. 1090-1097, vol. 114, No. 8; DOI: 10.1172/JCI200421055.
  • Louie, T.J. et al., “Tolevamer, a Novel Nonantibiotic Polymer, Compared with Vancomycin in the Treatment of Mild to Moderately Severe Clostridium difficile-Associated Diarrhea”, Clinical Infectious Diseases, Aug. 15, 2006 (electronically published on Jul. 11, 2006), pp. 411-420, vol. 43, © 2006 by the Infectious Diseases Society of America.
  • “Treatment of Clostridium difficile-Associated Disease (CDAD)”, The Medical Letter on Drugs and Therapeutics, Editor: Mark Abramowicz, M.D., Nov. 6, 2006, pp. 89-91, vol. 48, No. 1247, © 2006 The Medical Letter, Inc.
  • Mcpherson S. et al., “Intravenous Immunoglobulin for the Treatment of Severe, Refractory, and Recurrent Clostridium difficile Diarrhea”, Diseases of the Colon & Rectum, 2006 (Published online: Mar. 15, 2006), pp. 640-645, vol. 49, © 2006 The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons; DOI: 10.1007/s10350-006-0511-8.
  • Cone, L.A. et al., “A Durable Response to Relapsing Clostridium difficile Colitis May Require Combined Therapy with High-dose Oral Vancomycin and Intravenous Immune Globulin”, Infectious Diseases in Clinical Practice, Jul. 2006, pp. 217-220, vol. 14, No. 4, © 2006 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
  • Arnau, J. et al., “Reprint of: Current strategies for the use of affinity tags and tag removal for the purification of recombinant proteins”, Protein Expression and Purification, 2006 (Available online Dec. 28, 2005), pp. 1-13, vol. 18, Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Inc.; DOI: 10.1016/j.pep.2005.12.002.
  • Bauer, S. et al., “Proteinase 3 and CD177 are expressed on the plasma membrane of the same subset of neutrophils”, Journal of Leukocyte Biology, Feb. 2007, pp. 458-464, vol. 81, © 2007 Society for Leukocyte Biology; DOI: 10.1189/jlb.0806514.
  • Scott, L.M. et al., “JAK2 Exon 12 Mutations in Polycythemia Vera and Idiopathic Erythrocytosis”, The New England Journal of Medicine, Feb. 1, 2007, pp. 459-468, vol. 356, No. 5, Copyright © 2007 Massachusetts Medical Society.
  • Boullier S. et al., “Secretory IgA-Mediated Neutralization of Shigella flexneri Prevents Intestinal Tissue Destruction by Down-Regulating Inflammatory Circuits”, The Journal of Immunology, 2009 (Prepublished online: Oct. 14, 2009), pp. 5879-5885, vol. 183, Copyright © 2009 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.; DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.0901838.
  • Malhotra, A., “Tagging for Protein Expression”, Methods in Enzymology, Chapter 16, 2009, pp. 239-258, vol. 463, D 2009 Elsevier Inc.; DOI: 10.1016/S0076-6879(09)63016-0.
  • Block, H. et al., “Immobilized-Metal Affinity Chromatography (imac): a Review”, Methods in Enzymology, Chapter 27, 2009, pp. 439-473, vol. 463, © 2009 Elsevier Inc.; DOI: 0.1016/S0076-6879(09)63027-5.
  • Young, C.L. et al., “Recombinant protein expression and purification: A comprehensive review of affinity tags and microbial applications”, Biotechnology Journal, 2012, pp. 620-634, vol. 7, © 2012 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim; DOI: 10.1002/biot.201100155.
  • Kopera, E. et al., “Application of Ni(II)-Assisted Peptide Bond Hydrolysis to Non-Enzymatic Affinity Tag Removal”, PLoS ONE, May 4, 2012, 11 pages, vol. 7, No. 5, e36350, © 2012 Kopera et al.; DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036350.
  • Longet S. et al., “Human Plasma-derived Polymeric IgA and IgM Antibodies Associate with Secretory Component to Yield Biologically Active Secretory-like Antibodies”, The Journal of Biological Chemistry, Feb. 8, 2013 (Published online: Dec. 18, 2012), pp. 4085-4094, vol. 288, No. 6, © 2013 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.; DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M112.410811.
  • Temerinac, S. et al., “Cloning of PRV-1, a novel member of the uPAR receptor superfamily, which is overexpressed in polycythemia rubra vera”, Blood, Apr. 15, 2000, pp. 2569-2576, vol. 95, No. 8, © 2000 by The American Society of Hematology.
  • Australian Patent Examination Report No. 2 dated Mar. 31, 2015 for Australian Application No. 2013201393 filed Mar. 8, 2013.
  • English translation of Japanese Notification of Reasons for Refusal dated Oct. 21, 2016 for Japanese Application No. 2014-560387 filed Mar. 8, 2013.
  • English translation of Japanese Notification of Reasons for Refusal dated Aug. 29, 2017 for Japanese Application No. 2014-560387 filed Mar. 8, 2013.
  • Cohn, E.J. et al., “Preparation and Properties of Serum and Plasma Proteins. IV. A System for the Separation into Fractions of the Protein and Lipoprotein Components of Biological Tissues and Fluids”, J. Am. Chem. Soc., Mar. 1946, pp. 459-475, vol. 68.
  • Oncley, J.L. et al., “The Separation of the Antibodies, Isoagglutinins, Prothrombin, Plasminogen and β1-Lipoprotein into Subtractions of Human Plasma”, J. Am. Chem. Soc., Feb. 1949, pp. 541-550, vol. 71.
  • Kohler, G. et al., “Continuous cultures of fused cells secreting antibody of predefined specificity”, Nature, Aug. 1, 1975, pp. 495-497, vol. 256, No. 5517, Copyright © 1975 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.
  • Lindh, E et al., “Binding of Secretory Component to Human Immunoglobulin M”, Eur. J. Biochem., 1976, pp. 271-278, vol. 62.
  • Mietens, C. et al., “Treatment of Infantile E. coli Gastroenteritis with Specific Bovine anti-E. coli Milk Immunoglobulins”, Eur. J. Pediatr, 1979, pp. 239-252, vol. 132, © 1979 Springer-Verlag.
  • Ehrich, M. et al., “Production of Clostridium difficile Antitoxin”, Infection and Immunity, Jun. 1980, pp. 1041-1043, vol. 28, No. 3.
  • Lyerly, D.M. et al., “Biological Activities of Toxins A and B of Clostridium difficile”, Infection and Immunity, Mar. 1982, pp. 1147-1150, vol. 35, No. 3.
  • Libby, J.M. et al., “Effects of theTwo Toxins of Clostridium difficile in Antibiotic-Associated Cecitis in Hamsters”, Infection and Immunity, May 1982, pp. 822-829, vol. 36, No. 2.
  • Delacroix, D.L. et al., “Selective transport of polymeric immunoglobulin A in bile, Quantitative relationships of monomeric and polymeric immunoglobulin A, immunoglobulin M, and other proteins in serum, bile, and saliva”, J. Clin. Invest., Aug. 1982, pp. 230-241, vol. 70, © 1982 The American Society for Clinical Investigation, Inc.
  • Delacroix, D.L. et al., “Changes in size, subclass, and metabolic properties of serum immunoglobulin A in liver diseases and in other diseases with high serum immunoglobulin A”, J. Clin. Invest., Feb. 1983, pp. 358-367, vol. 71, © 1983 The American Society for Clinical Investigation, Inc.
  • Rothman, S.W. et al., “Differential Cytotoxic Effects of Toxins A and B Isolated from Clostridium difficile”, Infection and Immunity, Nov. 1984, pp. 324-331, vol. 46, No. 2, Copyright © 1984, American Society for Microbiology.
  • Lyerly, D.M. et al., “Effects of Clostridium difficile Toxins Given Intragastrically to Animals”, Infection and Immunity, Feb. 1985, pp. 349-352, vol. 47, No. 2, Copyright © 1985, American Society for Microbiology.
  • Gerding, D.N. et al., “Clostridium difficile-Associated Diarrhea and Colitis in Adults, A Prospective CaseC,ontrolled Epidemiologic Study”, Arch. Intern. Med., Jan. 1986, pp. 95-100, vol. 146.
  • Mcfarland, L.V. et al., “Review of Clostridium difficile-associated diseases”, American Journal of Infection Control, Jun. 1986, pp. 99-109, vol. 14, No. 3.
  • Lyerly, D.M. et al., “Characterization of Toxins A and B of Clostridium difficile with Monoclonal Antibodies”, Infection and Immunity, Oct. 1986, pp. 70-76, vol. 54, No. 1, Copyright © 1986, American Society for Microbiology.
  • Mitchell, T.J. et al., “Effect of toxin A and B of Clostridium difficile on rabbit ileum and colon”, Gut, 1986, pp. 78-85, vol. 27.
  • Brussow, H. et al., “Bovine Milk Immunoglobulins for Passive Immunity to Infantile Rotavirus Gastroenteritis”, Journal of Clinical Microbiology, Jun. 1987, pp. 982-986, vol. 25, No. 6, Copyright © 1987, American Society for Microbiology.
  • Hilpert, H. et al., “Use of Bovine Milk Concentrate Containing Antibody to Rotavirus to Treat Rotavirus Gastroenteritis in Infants”, The Journal of Infectious Diseases, Jul. 1987, pp. 158-166, vol. 156, No. 1, © 1987 by The University of Chicago.
  • Yoshiyama, Y. et al., “Specific antibodies to cholera toxin in rabbit milk are protective against Vibrio cholerae-induced intestinal secretion”, Immunology, 1987, pp. 543-547, vol. 61.
  • Mahe, S. et al., “Effect of Various Diets on Toxin Production by Two Strains of Clostridium difficile in Gnotobiotic Mice”, Infection and Immunity, Aug. 1987, pp. 1801-1805, vol. 55, No. 8, Copyright © 1987, American Society for Microbiology.
  • Triadafilopoulos, G. et al., “Differential Effects of Closfridium difficile Toxins A and B on Rabbit Ileum”, Gastroenterology, Aug. 1987, pp. 273-279, vol. 93, No. 2, © 1987 by the American Gastroenterological Association.
  • Lyerly, D.M. et al., “Clostridium dificile: Its Disease and Toxins”, Clinical Microbiology Reviews, Jan. 1988, pp. 1-18, vol. 1, No. 1, Copyright © 1988, American Society for Microbiology.
  • Tacket, C.O. et al., “Protection by milk immunoglobulin concentrate against oral challenge with enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli”, The New England Journal of Medicine, May 12, 1988, pp. 1240-1243, vol. 318, No. 19, Copyright © 2010 Massachusetts Medical Society.
  • Corthier, G. et al., “Emergence in Gnotobiotic Mice of Nontoxinogenic Clones of Clostridium difficile from a Toxinogenic One”, Infection and Immunity, Jun. 1988, pp. 1500-1504, vol. 56, No. 6, Copyright © 1988, American Society for Microbiology.
  • Lima, A.A.M. et al., “Effects of Clostridium difficile Toxins A and B in Rabbit Small and Large Intestine In Vivo and on cultured Cells In Vitro”, Infection and Immunity, Mar. 1988, pp. 582-588, vol. 56, No. 3, Copyright © 1988, American Society for Microbiology.
  • Martinez, R.D. et al., “Purification and Characterization of Clostridium sordellii Hemorrhagic Toxin and Cross-Reactivity with Clostridium dificile Toxin A (Enterotoxin)”, Infection and Immunity, May 1988, pp. 1215-1221, vol. 56, Vo. 5, Copyright © 1988, American Society for Microbiology.
  • Boesman-Finkelstein, M. et al., “Bovine Lactogenic Immunity against Cholera Toxin-Related Enterotoxins and Vibrio cholerae Outer Membranes”, Infection and Immunity, Apr. 1989, pp. 1227-1234, vol. 57, No. 4, Copyright © 1989, American Society for Microbiology.
  • Mcfarland, L.V. et al., “Nosocomial Acquisition of Clostridium Difficile Infection”, The New England Journal of Medicine, 1989, pp. 204-210, vol. 320, No. 4.
  • Barroso, L.A. et al., “Nucleotide sequence of Clostridium difficile toxin B gene”, Nucleic Acids Research, 1990, p. 4004, vol. 18, No. 13, © 1990 Oxford University Press.
  • Dove, C.H. et al., “Molecular Characterization of the Clostridium dificile Toxin A Gene”, Infection and Immunity, Feb. 1990, pp. 480-488, vol. 58, No. 2, Copyright © 1990, American Society for Microbiology.
  • Fayer, R. et al., “Immunotherapeutic Efficacy of Bovine Colostral Immunoglobulins from a Hyperimmunized Cow against Cryptosporidiosis in Neonatal Mice”, Infection and Immunity, Sep. 1990, pp. 2962-2965, vol. 58, No. 9, copyright © 1990, American Society for Microbiology.
  • Morris, J.B. et al., “Role of Surgery in Antibiotic-Induced Pseudomembranous Enterocolitis”, The American Journal of Surgery, Nov. 1990, pp. 535-539, vol. 160.
  • Tucker, K.D. et al., “Toxin A of Clostridium difficile is a Potent Cytotoxin”, Journal of Clinical Microbiology, May 1990, pp. 869-871, vol. 28, No. 5, Copyright © 1990, American Society for Microbiology.
  • Lyerly, D.M. et al., “Passive Immunization of Hamsters against Disease Caused by Clostridium difficile by Use of Bovine Immunoglobulin G Concentrate”, Infection and Immunity, Jun. 1991, pp. 2215-2218, vol. 59, No. 6, Copyright © 1991, American Society for Microbiology.
  • Leung, D.Y.M. et al., “Treatment with intravenously administered gamma globulin of chronic relapsing colitis induced by Clostridium difficile toxin”, The Journal of Pediatrics, Apr. 1991, pp. 633-637, vol. 118, No. 4, Part 1.
  • Corthier, G. et al., “Protection against Experimental Pseudomembranous Colitis in Gnotobiotic Mice by Use of Monoclonal Antibodies against Clostridium dificile Toxin A”, Infection and Immunity, Mar. 1991, pp. 1192-1195, vol. 59, No. 3, Copyright © 1991, American Society for Microbiology.
  • Pothoulakis, C. et al., “Characterization of rabbit ileal receptors for Clostridium difficile toxin A, Evidence for a receptor-coupled G protein”, The Journal of Clinical Investigation, Jul. 1991, pp. 119-125, vol. 88, No. 1, © The American Society for Clinical Investigation, Inc.; DOI: 10.1172/JCI115267.
  • Kelly, C.P. et al., “Human Colonic Aspirates Containing Immunoglobulin A Antibody to Clostridium difficile Toxin A Inhibit Toxin A-Receptor Binding”, Gastroenterology, Jan. 1992, pp. 35-40, vol. 102, No. 1, © 1992 by the American Gastroenterological Association.
  • Tjellstrom, B. et al., “Oral immunoglobulin A supplement in treatment of Clostridium difficile enteritis”, The Lancet, Mar. 13, 1993, pp. 701-702, vol. 341.
  • Aoyama, K. et al., “Separation of different molecular forms of mouse IgA and IgM monoclonal antibodies by high-performance liquid chromatography on spherical hydroxyapatite beads”, Journal of Immunological Methods, 1993, pp. 201-210, vol. 162, © 1993 Elsevier Science Publishers B.V.
  • Bacon, III, A.E. et al., Immunoglobulin G Directed Against Toxins A and B of Clostridium difficile in the General Population and Patients with Antibiotic-Associated Diarrhea, Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis., 1994, pp. 205-209, vol. 18, © 1994 Elsevier Science Inc.
  • Kelly, C.P. et al., “Clostridium difficile Colitis”, The New England Journal of Medicine, Jan. 27, 1994, pp. 257-262, vol. 330, No. 4.
  • Weltzin, R. et al., “Intranasal Monoclonal Immunoglobulin A against Respiratory Syncytial Virus Protects against Upper and Lower Respiratory Tract Infections in Mice”, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, Dec. 1994, pp. 2785-2791, vol. 38, No. 12, Copyright © 1994, American Society for Microbiology.
  • Johnson, S. et al., “Selective Neutralization of a Bacterial Enterotoxin by Serum Immunoglobulin A in Response to Mucosal Disease”, Infection and Immunity, Aug. 1995, pp. 3166-3173, vol. 63, No. 8, Copyright © 1995, American Society for Microbiology.
  • Lullau, E. et al., “Antigen Binding Properties of Purified Immunoglobulin A and Reconstituted Secretory Immunoglobulin A Antibodies”, The Journal of Biological Chemistry, Jul. 5, 1996, pp. 16300-16309, vol. 271, No. 27, © 1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
  • Weltzin, R. et al., “Intranasal Monoclonal IgA Antibody to Respiratory Syncytial Virus Protects Rhesus Monkeys against Upper and Lower Respiratory Tract Infection”, The Journal of Infectious Diseases, Aug. 1996, pp. 256-261, vol. 174, © 1996 by The University of Chicago.
  • Salcedo, J. et al., “Intravenous immunoglobulin therapy for severe Clostridium difficile colitis”, Gut, 1997, pp. 366-370, vol. 41.
  • Corthesy, B. et al., “Recombinant secretory IgA for immune intervention against mucosal pathogens”, Biochemical Society Transactions, 1997, pp. 471-475, vol. 25.
  • Jones, R.M.L. et al., “Thiol-disulfide redox buffers maintain a structure of immunoglobulin A that is essential for optimal in vitro binding to secretory component”, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 1998, pp. 265-274, vol. 1429, © 1998 Elsevier Science B.V.
  • Luellau, E. et al., “Development of a downstream process for the isolation and separation of monoclonal Immunoglobulin A monomers, dimers and polymers from cell culture supernatant”, Journal of Chromatography A, 1998, pp. 165-175, vol. 796, © 1998 Elsevier Science B.V.
Patent History
Patent number: 10385117
Type: Grant
Filed: Sep 3, 2014
Date of Patent: Aug 20, 2019
Patent Publication Number: 20170058018
Inventors: Stephen C. Brown (Ann Arbor, MI), Michael R. Simon (Ann Arbor, MI)
Primary Examiner: Daniel E Kolker
Assistant Examiner: James Rogers
Application Number: 14/476,559
Classifications
Current U.S. Class: Immunoglobulin, Antiserum, Antibody, Or Antibody Fragment, Except Conjugate Or Complex Of The Same With Nonimmunoglobulin Material (424/130.1)
International Classification: A61K 39/00 (20060101); C07K 1/14 (20060101); C07K 19/00 (20060101); B01D 15/38 (20060101); C07K 16/00 (20060101); C07K 16/06 (20060101); C07K 16/18 (20060101); C07K 14/735 (20060101);