DISPOSABLE GLOVES

A disposable glove for a hand of a human wearer that comprises polyvinyl chloride (PVC) and is substantially impermeable to liquid water. The glove provides an elastic material with superior restore rate and elasticity parameters, while maintaining good tensile strength.

Skip to: Description  ·  Claims  · Patent History  ·  Patent History
Description
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation application of application Ser. No. 10/871,893 filed on Jun. 18, 2004, which claims the benefit of the U.S. Provisional Application 60/480,773 filed on Jun. 23, 2003 and entitled “Disposable Gloves” and these applications are hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to gloves and, more specifically, to disposable gloves comprising polyvinyl chloride.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Disposable gloves are widely used as a protective measure and have become mandatory in many industries and nearly all medical settings. To allow ease of handling, disposable gloves are made of thin and elastic material to minimize the space between the skin and the glove. One material that has previously enjoyed high usage in manufacturing disposable gloves is latex. Latex is produced from natural rubber trees and is processed to make various products. But many life threatening problems have been associated with the use of latex, especially in situations involving repeated frequent exposure, such as medical practitioners wearing latex gloves. Latex contains proteins, which may contain allergens that affect a certain percentage of the population. Additionally, the increasing amounts of time that latex gloves are worn has resulted in increased occurrences of adverse symptoms.

Synthetic gloves have become the preferred substitute to avoid long term exposure to allergens associated with latex. A problem with existing synthetic gloves is that synthetic gloves are not sufficiently elastic. If gloves are not sufficiently elastic, they do not fit closely with the wrist.

There is an increasing need to provide a disposable synthetic glove that is more elastic than presently available synthetic gloves.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

According to one embodiment, a disposable glove comprises polyvinyl chloride having a tensile strength before aging of at least about 12 Mpa as measured in accordance with ASTM D 412-98a on a glove sample having a thickness at the hand area of from about 0.08 mm to about 0.12 mm, and a modulus of elasticity of less than about 2.5 Mpa as measured in accordance with ASTM D 412-98a on a glove sample having a thickness at the hand area of from about 0.08 mm to about 0.12 mm. The material forming the glove is substantially impermeable to liquid water. The glove may further comprise a plasticizer and an elastomer.

According to another embodiment, a disposable glove comprises polyvinyl chloride having a tensile strength before aging of at least about 12 Mpa as measured in accordance with ASTM D 412-98a on a glove sample having a thickness at the hand area of from about 0.08 mm to about 0.12 mm, and an elongation of break of greater than about 450% as measured in accordance with ASTM D 412-98a on a glove sample having a thickness at the hand area of from about 0.08 mm to about 0.12 mm. The material forming the glove is substantially impermeable to liquid water. The glove may further comprise a plasticizer and an elastomer. The elongation of break may be greater than about 500% as measured in accordance with ASTM D 412-98a on a glove sample having a thickness at the hand area of from about 0.08 mm to about 0.12 mm.

According to a further embodiment, a disposable glove comprises a first polyvinyl chloride resin having a degree of polymerization of from about 1,400 to about 1,700 as measured in accordance with JIS K 6721-77, a second polyvinyl chloride resin having a degree of polymerization of at least 1,750 as measured in accordance with JIS K 6721-77, a plasticizer and an elastomer. The glove may further comprise a viscosity reducer and/or a stabilizing agent.

According to yet another embodiment, a disposable glove comprises polyvinyl chloride having a durometer hardness reading less than 56 on a glove sample having a thickness at the hand area of from about 0.08 mm to about 0.12 mm, and a compressive strength of less than about 230 Mpa at 0.100 inch deflection on a glove sample having a thickness at the hand area of from about 0.08 mm to about 0.12 mm. The material forming the glove is substantially impermeable to liquid water.

According to one method, a disposable glove may be formed by providing a first polyvinyl chloride resin having a degree of polymerization of from about 1,400 to about 1,700 as measured in accordance with JIS K 6721-77, a second polyvinyl chloride resin having a degree of polymerization of at least 1,750 as measured in accordance with JIS K 6721-77, a plasticizer and an elastomer. The first polyvinyl chloride, the second polyvinyl chloride, the plasticizer and the elastomer are mixed to form a mixture. The mixture is dipped onto a glove-forming surface and dried so as to form the glove. The mixture may be heated after the glove is formed by dipping the mixture onto a glove-forming surface. One example of a production-line setting that may be used is a dipping time of from about 6 to about 8 seconds onto a glove-forming surface, followed by heating and drying of from about 7 to about 9 minutes at a heating temperature of about 200° C. A viscosity reducer and/or a stabilizing agent may be provided and mixed with the first polyvinyl chloride, the second polyvinyl chloride, the plasticizer and the elastomer to form the mixture.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Other advantages of the invention will become apparent on reading the following detailed description and on reference to the drawings in which:

FIG. 1 illustrates a synthetic glove according to one embodiment; and

FIG. 2 illustrates a cross-section generally taken through section line 2-2 of the glove shown in FIG. 1.

 DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE ILLUSTRATED EMBODIMENT

FIG. 1 illustrates a single layer glove 10 comprising a hand area 12 and a wrist area 14 according to one embodiment. The glove 10 of FIG. 1 is substantially impermeable to liquid water and is typically disposable. FIG. 2 is a cross-sectional view of the glove 10 generally taken along section line 2-2 shown in FIG. 1 illustrating a generally uniform thickness t. Although the glove may be of generally uniform thickness t, in one embodiment the hand area 12 has a thickness t from about 0.08 mm to about 0.12 mm and the wrist area 14 has a thickness t less than about 0.10 mm. Thus, the glove may have at least two different thicknesses. In another embodiment, the hand area 12 has a thickness of about 0.10 mm and the wrist area 14 has a thickness of about 0.07 mm. Thus, the glove in this embodiment has a thickness near or at the wrist area that is less than the thickness at the fingers.

Still referring to FIG. 1, the glove 10 has an open end 16 into which a hand is inserted. Opposite the open end 16 is a distal end 18 that is closed to form a closed end 20. The distal end 18 comprises a primary portion 22 and one or more secondary portions 24 located closer to the closed end 20 than the primary portion 22. In one embodiment, the secondary portion 24 terminates at the closed end 20 and defines a chamber smaller than a chamber defined by the primary portion 22. In the illustrated embodiment, the primary portion 22 includes the hand area 12, whereas one of the secondary portions 24 includes a finger area 26. Similarly, an open-end portion 28 comprises the wrist area 14.

The glove 10 according to one embodiment comprises a suspension-grade polyvinyl chloride (PVC), an emulsion-grade polyvinyl chloride, a plasticizer and an elastomer. To provide improved clarity between the different PVCs, the suspension-grade PVC will also be referred herein as PVC A, while the emulsion-grade PVC will also be referred herein as PVC B. The glove 10 in this embodiment also comprise a viscosity reducer, a stabilizing agent and a color pigment. Tables 1A, 1B, 1C, 1D and 1E set forth examples of components and quantities to form the disposable gloves according to one embodiment.

In this embodiment, the first PVC resin (PVC A) is a suspension-grade homopolymer resin having properties comparable to those set forth in Table 1A below. The PVC A resin is generally characterized as being a micro-suspension grade, having low viscosity, and having a medium degree of polymerization Specifically, the viscosity of PVC A resin was from about 3,000 to about 4,000 cps as determined by ASTM D 1824-90. The degree of polymerization (DP) of PVC A resin is generally from about 1,400 to about 1,700 and, more specifically, from about 1,600 to about 1,700 as measured in accordance with JIS K 6721-77. One example of PVC A resin is a PVC marketed under the name of LP-170g by LG Chemical Ltd. The PVC A resin may be used in paste form. It is contemplated that other resins having these general characteristics may be used in the present invention.

The second PVC resin (PVC B) in this embodiment is a high-polymeric resin having properties comparable to those set forth in Table 1B below. As used herein, the term “high polymeric resin” (i.e., high polymerization-grade resin) is a resin having a degree of polymerization (DP) of at least about 1750, as measured in accordance with JIS K 6721-77. This PVC B resin is generally characterized as being emulsion-grade and having high viscosity. The degree of polymerization (DP) of the PVC B resin is typically from about 1800 to about 2200, and, more specifically, from about 1900 to about 2100 as measured in accordance with JIS K 6721-77. The PVC B resin may used in paste form. The PVC B resin generally has a K-value from about 78 to about 82 as determined by DIN 53726. One example of PVC B resin is marketed under the name of EH-2075 by Hanwha Chemical.

On a proportionate basis, the glove 10 generally comprises a greater amount of the medium polymerization grade resin (PVC A resin) than the amount of the high polymerization grade resin (PVC B resin). It is contemplated that the proportions set forth in Table 1D may be varied. For example, the proportion between the PVC A resin and the PVC B resin is generally from about 40 or 50 to about 75% PVC A resin as compared to PVC B resin and, more specifically, from about 55 to about 65% PVC A resin as compared to PVC B resin. Thus, the glove comprises a ratio of the first polyvinyl chloride resin to the second polyvinyl chloride resin of from about 0.4 or about 0.5 to about 0.75 or, more specifically, a ratio of the first polyvinyl chloride resin to the second polyvinyl chloride resin of from about 0.55 to about 0.65.

According to one embodiment, the glove 10 further comprises a plasticizer. It is contemplated that a number of plasticizers may be used, including those known to one skilled in the art. One example of a desired plasticizer to be used in forming the disposable gloves is diisononyl phthalate (DINP). DINP is desirable because of its balance of several properties. It is contemplated that other plasticizers such as dioctyl phthalate (DOP), diisodecyl phthalate (DIDP), di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (DEHP), and combinations thereof may be used. It is also contemplated that DINP may be used in combinations with DOP, DEHP and/or DIDP. Table 1C provides a comparative list of several properties associated with DINP, DOP and DIDP, which is generally referred to as phthalate plasticizers.

It is also contemplated that other plasticizers may be used, such as diethylhexyl adipate (DOA), alone or in combinations with other plasticizers such as those mentioned above. The glove desirably comprises a plasticizer in an amount greater than either the amount of PVC A resin or PVC B resin. In one embodiment, the total amount of the PVC resins is greater than the amount of the plasticizer.

According to one embodiment, the glove 10 further comprises an elastomer. On example of an elastomer that may used is marketed under the name OLICIZER-20N by Aekyung Petrochemical Co., Ltd. This elastomer has a ph of from about 6.5 to about 7.5, a viscosity of from about 2,000 to 3,000 cps at 25° C. The molecular weight of this elastomer is from about 3,000 to 4,000 and has a specific gravity of about 1.10 at 25° C.

It is contemplated that a viscosity reducer, stabilizing agent and color pigment may be added in forming the glove. For example, in one embodiment, the viscosity reducer is TXIB: 2,2-dimethyl-1-(methylethyl)-1,3-propanediyl bis(2-methylpropanoate). It is contemplated that other viscosity reducers may be used. It is contemplated that stabilizing agents known to those skilled in the art made be used. One example is a preparation containing calcium and zinc soap. Color pigment known to those skilled in the art may be added to provide a desired color of the glove.

Table 1D lists components and proportions according to one embodiment, while Table 1E lists some suppliers of these components.

TABLE 1A PVC A (Suspension-Grade) Properties Property/ Test Characteristic Test Method Unit Condition Value Degree of JIS K 6721-77 — 30° C. 1650 ± 50  Polymerization (DP) K-value DIN 53726 — — 78 Apparent Density ASTM D 1895-90 g/cm3 — 0.34 ± 0.06 Brookfield Viscosity ASTM D 1824-90 cps 6 RPM 3500 ± 500  (DOP 60 phr 100 PVC)

TABLE 1B PVC B (Emulsion-Grade) Properties Property/ Test Characteristic Test Method Unit Condition Value Degree of JIS K 6721-77 — 25° C. 2000 ± 200  Polymerization (DP) K-value JIS 6721 — — 77.4-81.0 Apparent Density JIS 6721 g/cm3 — 0.20-0.40 Brookfield Viscosity ASTM D 1824-90 Pa · 5 25° C. 4.5 (DOP 60 phr, 100 PVC)

TABLE 1C Phthalate Property Comparison Volume Vis- Resistivity cosity Modulus Ester OHM-cm, cps, Tensile 50% Molecular Phthalate Value 30° C. 25° C. Strength kg/cm2 Weight DOP 287 2.0 × 103 54 225 55 391 DINP 268 2.0 × 103 59 237 61 419 DIDP 251 5.0 × 103 72 238 72 447 Mixture: PVC 100, Plasticizer 50 PHR, Stabilizer 1 PHR

TABLE 1D Component Proportions Component Proportion Raw Materials kgs PVC A Resin (Suspension) 60 PVC B Resin (Emulsion) 40 Plasticizer 90 ± 3 Viscosity Reducer 12 ± 3 Stabilizing Agent  1 + 2 Color pigment 2.84 Elastomer 15

TABLE 1E Material/Component Supplier PVC A Resin LG Chemical Ltd., LP-170 g Yeosu Plant, South Korea PVC B Resin Hanwha Chemical EH-2075 Corporation, Yeosu, South Korea Plasticizer N/A DINP: diisononyl phthalate Elastomer Aekyung Petrochemical OLICIZER-20N Co., Ltd., South Korea Viscosity Reducer Eastman Chemical Ltd. TXIB: 2,2-dimethyl-1-(methylethyl)- 1,3-propanediyl bis(2-methylpropanoate) Stabilizing Agent N/A Preparation containing Calcium and Zinc Soap Color Pigment N/A white color

According to one method, a composition of the materials listed in Table 1E may be prepared as follows. The liquid raw material mix is agitated for about 30 minutes. The solid raw material (e.g., the PVC resin) is added to the liquid raw material and mixed for over 50 minutes. The remaining raw materials are added and the blend is mixed for about 120 minutes so as to obtain a composition viscosity of about 700 cps at a temperature of about 55° C.±1°. The composition is used to form the gloves in a production-line setting including using dipping times of about 8 seconds onto a glove-forming surface, followed by heating and drying of about 6 minutes at a heating temperature of about 200° C. It is contemplated that other production-line settings may be used such as dipping times of from about 6 to about 8 seconds onto a glove-forming surface, followed by heating and drying of from about 7 to about 9 minutes at a heating temperature of about 200° C.

Some desirable properties of a glove include a tensile strength before aging of greater than 10 Mpa and typically greater than about 12 Mpa for a sample thickness of from about 0.08 to about 0.12 mm as measured in accordance with ASTM D 412-98a. It is more desirable to have a tensile strength before aging of greater than 10 Mpa and typically greater than about 13 or 14 Mpa for a sample thickness of from about 0.08 to about 0.12 mm as measured in accordance with ASTM D 412-98a.

The elongation break of a glove is generally greater than 400% and typically greater than 450% or 500% for a sample thickness at the hand area of from about 0.08 to about 0.12 mm as measured in accordance with ASTM D 412-98a. The elongation break of a glove may even be greater than 525 or 550% for a sample thickness at the hand area of from about 0.08 to about 0.12 mm as measured in accordance with ASTM D 412-98a.

It is also desirable to have a 100% stress at a definite elongation of less than 4.5 Mpa for a sample thickness at the hand area of from about 0.08 to about 0.12 mm as measured in accordance with ASTM D 412-98a. It is also desirable to have a 100% stress at a definite elongation of less than 4.0 Mpa or less than 3.5 MPa for a sample thickness at the hand area of from about 0.08 to about 0.12 mm as measured in accordance with ASTM D 412-98a.

It is also desirable to have a 100% load at a definite elongation of less than 2.8 N for a sample thickness at the hand area of from about 0.08 to about 0.12 mm as measured in accordance with ASTM D 412-98a. It is also desirable to have a 100% load at a definite elongation of less than 2.5 N or less than 2.25 N for a sample thickness at the hand area of from about 0.08 to about 0.12 mm as measured in accordance with ASTM D 412-98a.

The gloves of the present invention also have desirable numbers when performing a durometer hardness test. A durometer hardness determines the indentation hardness of the material. It is believed that the durometer hardness is indicative of softness and that the lower the durometer hardness, the softer the glove. The durometer hardness test is defined herein by the following steps:

    • 1. Die cut, square specimens, approximately 2″×2″ (width×length) are prepared from randomly chosen gloves, so that they can be stacked to a thickness of approximately 0.25 inch.
    • 2. The individual samples are evenly stacked on top of each other. The outside of each of the square glove specimens faces upward and the inside faces downwards. The total thickness of the stack is measured and recorded in accordance with ASTM D3767-01 Standard Practice for Rubber-Measurement of Dimensions, Method A.
    • 3. The stacked specimens are conditioned at 23° C. and 50% R.H. (relative humidity) for a minimum of 40 hours prior to testing.
    • 4. A calibrated Type A Durometer is used to determine the hardness on the top layer of the stacked specimens, based upon ASTM D2240-03 Standard Test Method for Rubber Property-Durometer Hardness.

The gloves of the present invention generally have a durometer hardness in accordance with the above procedure of less than 57. More specifically, the gloves of the present invention generally have a durometer hardness in accordance with the above procedure of less than 55 or 53.

The gloves of the present invention also have desirable numbers when performing a compressive strength test. Compressive strength measures the force in pounds necessary to compress the material to a specified deflection. It is also believed that compressive strength is indicative of softness and that the lower the compressive strength, the softer the glove.

The compressive strength test is defined herein by the following steps:

    • 1. Die cut, square specimens, approximately 2″×2″ (width×length) are prepared from randomly chosen gloves, so that they can be stacked to a thickness of approximately 0.25 inch.
    • 2. The individual samples are evenly stacked on top of each other. The outside of each of the square glove specimens faces upward and the inside faces downwards. The total thickness of the stack is measured and recorded in accordance with ASTM D3767-01 Standard Practice for Rubber-Measurement of Dimensions, Method A.
    • 3. The specimens are conditioned at 23° C. and 53% R.H. (relative humidity) for a minimum of 40 hours prior to testing.
    • 4. The stacked specimen is placed on a flat stationary platen of a suitable compression tester.
    • 5. A flat, metal, 0.75″ diameter presser foot is attached to the upper movable platen of the compression tester.
    • 6. The specimen stack is compressed a total of approximately 0.2 inch, at a crosshead speed of 0.050 inch/minute.
    • 7. The force in pounds necessary to compress the specimen stack to 0.050 inch, 0.075 inch, 0.100 inch, 0.125 inch, 0.150 inch, and 0.175 inch are recorded.

The gloves of the present invention generally have a compressive strength in accordance with the above procedure at 0.100 inch deflection of less than about 230 lbs. More specifically, the gloves of the present invention generally have a compressive strength in accordance with the above procedure at 0.100 inch deflection of less than about 215 or 200 lbs.

EXAMPLES Example 1

To show the improved properties of the inventive gloves, several properties were tested in accordance with ASTM D 412-98a. Tables 2 and 3 (located below), which were tested by a first laboratory, compiled several properties from a Comparative Glove 1 and an Inventive Glove 1. The measurements were in accordance with ASTM D 412-98a and were applied to a sample having a length of about 40 mm and a thickness at the hand area of about 0.10 mm. The stretch speed was 500 mm/min.

Comparative Glove 1 was marketed by Medline as a powder-free vinyl synthetic glove and is referred to as MDS 192075. Comparative Glove 1 included polyvinyl chloride (PVC), di-octyl-phthalate (DOP) or diethylhexyl adipate (DOA), 2,2-dimethyl-1-(methylethyl)-1,3-propanediyl bis(2-methylpropanoate) (TXIB), stabilizer, epoxidized soybean oil and polyurethane (PU) emulsion. The PVC resin used in Comparative Glove 1 was a LP 170G resin having a degree of polymerization between 1400 and 1700. Inventive Glove 1 had the composition and quantities as set forth above in Tables 1D and 1E.

Tables 2 and 3 illustrate physical property sets for nineteen samples manufactured in accordance with the above process for Comparative Glove 1 and twenty samples manufactured in accordance with the above process for Inventive Glove 1, respectively.

TABLE 2 Comparative Glove 1 Load at Stress at Stress at 300% 300% Max Tensile Elasticity Elongation of 100% Sample Elongation Elongation Load Strength Modulus Break Elongation Load at 100% No. (N) (Mpa) (N) (Mpa) (Mpa) (%) (Mpa) Elongation (N)  1 7.549 12.58 10.45 17.41 3.91 416.5 5.09 3.054  2 7.598 12.66 10.83 18.06 3.88 425.2 5.06 3.036  3 7.246 12.08 10.95 18.24 3.73 458.9 4.69 2.812  4 7.147 11.91 8.26 13.77 3.69 350.7 4.87 2.920  5 7.254 11.52 11.17 17.73 3.41 468.0 4.68 2.951  6 7.888 12.52 10.37 16.45 3.82 397.6 5.23 3.295  7 7.429 11.79 10.22 16.22 3.59 416.3 4.73 2.982  8 7.004 11.67 9.99 16.66 3.54 432.8 4.72 2.830  9 7.344 11.66 10.09 16.02 3.61 420.2 4.62 2.911 10 7.241 12.07 9.69 16.15 3.67 402.9 4.91 2.946 11 7.321 12.20 10.33 17.22 3.66 427.1 5.08 3.049 12 7.237 12.06 9.70 16.16 3.65 413.5 4.91 2.946 13 7.237 12.06 9.75 16.25 3.70 415.0 4.89 2.933 14 7.112 12.48 9.55 16.75 3.82 409.1 5.24 2.987 15 7.223 12.04 10.79 17.98 3.66 459.2 4.91 2.946 16 7.397 12.33 10.14 16.90 3.72 416.9 5.08 3.049 17 6.875 12.06 9.00 15.80 3.59 403.3 5.04 2.871 18 7.496 12.49 10.29 17.16 3.82 413.5 5.07 3.045 19 6.607 11.59 9.34 16.38 3.57 431.3 4.60 2.621 Average 7.274 12.09 9.84 16.36 3.70 411.0 4.91 2.952

TABLE 3 Inventive Glove 1 Load at Stress at Stress at 300% 300% Max Tensile Elasticity Elongation of 100% Sample Elongation Elongation Load Strength Modulus Break Elongation Load at 100% No. (N) (Mpa) (N) (Mpa) (Mpa) (%) (Mpa) Elongation (N)  1 5.192 8.65 8.504 14.17 2.59 487.7 3.49 2.094  2 5.058 8.43 7.397 12.33 2.52 442.1 3.33 2.000  3 5.259 8.35 8.321 13.21 2.49 477.0 3.30 2.076  4 5.232 8.30 8.286 13.15 2.47 478.1 3.33 2.098  5 5.062 8.44 7.879 13.13 2.45 463.2 3.39 2.036  6 5.129 8.14 8.071 12.81 2.38 482.4 3.27 2.062  7 5.277 8.79 8.487 14.14 2.56 486.2 3.62 2.170  8 5.379 8.97 8.317 13.86 2.50 463.1 3.66 2.196  9 5.121 8.53 7.540 12.57 2.59 445.0 3.41 2.045 10 5.112 8.52 7.933 13.22 2.39 466.8 3.57 2.143 11 5.009 8.35 8.348 13.91 2.48 502.9 3.29 1.973 12 5.250 8.75 8.402 14.00 2.58 483.9 3.53 2.121 13 5.013 8.36 7.647 12.75 2.49 461.4 3.26 1.955 14 5.152 8.59 7.080 11.80 2.64 416.8 3.36 2.018 15 5.393 8.99 8.210 13.68 2.63 458.1 3.54 2.125 16 5.317 8.86 6.223 10.37 2.74 355.0 3.59 2.152 17 5.165 8.61 8.121 13.53 2.51 482.0 3.31 1.987 18 4.817 8.45 7.567 13.28 2.50 463.6 3.34 1.906 19 5.286 8.81 7.223 12.04 2.54 420.4 3.53 2.121 20 5.098 8.94 8.049 14.12 2.67 466.7 3.54 2.018 Average 5.166 8.59 7.880 13.10 2.54 460.1 3.43 2.065

As shown in Tables 2 and 3, Inventive Glove 1 had a much more desirable average elongation of break than the Comparative Glove 1. Compare 460% of Inventive Glove 1 and 411% of Comparative Glove 1. Additionally, Inventive Glove 1 had a much more desirable average elasticity modulus than Comparative Glove 1. Compare 2.54 Mpa of Inventive Glove 1 and 3.70 Mpa of Comparative Glove 1. The desirable elasticity modulus and elongation of break did not result in an undesirable tensile strength in Inventive Glove 1. The average tensile strength before aging of Inventive Glove 1 was 13.1 Mpa and the average tensile strength before aging of Comparative Glove 1 was 16.7 Mpa. Thus, Inventive Glove 1 had a surprising balance of desirable properties.

Example 2

To show the improved properties of the inventive gloves, several properties were tested in accordance with ASTM D 412-98a. Tables 4-6 (located below), which were tested by a second laboratory, compiled several properties from Comparative Gloves 1 and 2, and Inventive Glove 1. The measurements were in accordance with ASTM D 412-98a and were applied to a sample having a length of about 40 mm and a thickness at the hand area of about 0.10 mm. The stretch speed was 500 mm/min.

Comparative Glove 1 was marketed by Medline as a powder-free vinyl synthetic glove as MDS 192075. Comparative Glove 1 included polyvinyl chloride (PVC), di-octyl-phthalate (DOP) or diethylhexyl adipate (DOA), 2,2-dimethyl-1-(methylethyl)-1,3-propanediyl bis(2-methylpropanoate) (TXIB), stabilizer, epoxidized soybean oil and polyurethane (PU) emulsion. The PVC resin used in Comparative Glove 1 was a LP 170G resin having a degree of polymerization between 1400 and 1700.

Comparative Glove 2 was marketed under MediGuard® Advantage and described as a vinyl synthetic, powder-free, examination glove under the number MSV 502. Comparative Glove 2 included polyvinyl chloride (PVC), di-octyl-phthalate (DOP), 2,2-dimethyl-1-(methylethyl)-1,3-propanediyl bis(2-methylpropanoate) (TXIB), stabilizer, epoxidized soybean oil, polyurethane (PU) emulsion and HCC25108 yellow pigment. The PVC resin used in Comparative Glove 2 was a LP 170G resin having a degree of polymerization between 1400 and 1700. The proportions of Comparative Glove 2 are as follows: 100 PVC, 88 DEHP, 12 TXIB, 1 stabilizer and 2.34 color pigment.

Inventive Glove 1 had the composition and quantities as set forth above in Tables 1D and 1E.

Tables 4-6 illustrate physical property sets for twenty samples manufactured in accordance with the above process for the Comparative Gloves 1 and 2, and Inventive Glove 1, respectively.

TABLE 4 Comparative Glove 1 Load at Stress at Stress at 300% 300% Max Tensile Elasticity Elongation of 100% Sample Elongation Elongation Load Strength Modulus Break Elongation Load at 100% No. (N) (Mpa) (N) (Mpa) (Mpa) (%) (Mpa) Elongation (N)  1 6.759 11.26 10.370 17.28 3.17 561.6 4.97 2.982  2 6.456 10.76 9.348 15.58 3.02 448.6 4.65 2.781  3 6.393 10.65 9.429 15.71 3.00 513.2 4.50 2.701  4 6.067 10.11 9.768 16.28 2.95 485.1 4.32 2.589  5 6.174 10.29 9.143 15.24 3.05 447.9 4.31 2.585  6 6.121 10.74 9.371 16.44 3.04 465.8 4.61 2.625  7 6.103 10.17 9.500 15.83 2.91 585.8 4.31 2.585  8 6.335 10.56 9.563 15.94 2.96 465.2 4.47 2.683  9 6.156 10.26 10.070 16.78 3.01 489.0 4.29 2.571 10 6.402 11.86 9.558 17.70 3.34 466.1 4.99 2.696 11 6.179 10.30 9.214 15.36 3.00 447.6 4.35 2.612 12 6.379 10.63 10.830 18.05 3.10 506.2 4.51 2.705 13 6.107 10.18 9.634 16.06 2.95 530.6 4.30 2.580 14 6.424 11.27 9.598 16.86 3.28 504.4 4.78 2.723 15 6.201 10.33 8.031 13.39 2.91 473.5 4.42 2.652 16 5.982 9.97 8.960 14.93 2.80 585.6 4.29 2.576 17 6.156 11.40 7.808 14.46 3.16 467.4 4.84 2.612 18 6.125 10.21 9.214 15.36 2.89 550.6 4.37 2.621 19 6.424 10.71 9.491 15.82 3.12 656.8 4.57 2.741 20 6.179 10.30 9.580 15.97 2.97 525.0 4.36 2.616 Average 6.256 10.60 9.424 15.95 3.03 508.8 4.51 2.662

TABLE 5 Comparative Glove 2 Load at Stress at Stress at 300% 300% Max Tensile Elasticity Elongation of 100% Sample Elongation Elongation Load Strength Modulus Break Elongation Load at 100% No. (N) (Mpa) (N) (Mpa) (Mpa) (%) (Mpa) Elongation (N)  1 5.768 9.61 8.853 14.75 2.68 560.3 4.13 2.478  2 5.554 8.82 9.661 15.33 2.54 528.3 3.73 2.348  3 5.518 9.20 9.732 16.22 2.63 519.8 3.99 2.393  4 5.696 9.49 10.21 17.02 2.74 619.7 4.02 2.411  5 5.571 9.29 9.237 15.39 2.69 556.6 3.90 2.339  6 5.723 9.54 9.201 15.33 2.64 475.4 4.06 2.438  7 6.196 10.33 9.817 16.36 3.01 482.7 4.36 2.616  8 5.594 9.32 9.018 15.03 2.77 586.8 3.90 2.339  9 5.732 9.10 9.143 14.51 2.61 562.1 3.85 2.424 10 5.375 8.96 8.603 14.34 2.57 461.1 3.90 2.339 11 5.638 9.40 8.879 14.80 2.65 469.8 4.11 2.464 12 5.920 9.87 8.973 14.96 2.84 468.3 4.20 2.522 13 5.500 9.17 9.308 15.51 2.68 590.4 3.81 2.286 14 5.379 8.97 8.161 13.60 2.59 555.9 3.73 2.237 15 5.777 9.63 9.527 15.88 2.75 484.0 4.09 2.455 16 5.679 9.46 8.103 13.50 2.64 509.7 3.96 2.375 17 5.527 9.21 9.402 15.67 2.66 593.2 3.84 2.304 18 5.567 9.28 8.817 14.69 2.72 471.9 3.92 2.353 19 5.571 9.29 8.411 14.02 2.62 513.5 3.91 2.348 20 5.487 9.14 9.420 15.70 2.63 502.4 3.83 2.299 Average 5.639 9.35 9.124 15.13 2.68 525.6 3.96 2.388

TABLE 6 Inventive Glove 1 Load at Stress at Stress at 300% 300% Max Tensile Elasticity Elongation of 100% Sample Elongation Elongation Load Strength Modulus Break Elongation Load at 100% No. (N) (Mpa) (N) (Mpa) (Mpa) (%) (Mpa) Elongation (N)  1 4.969 8.28 7.665 12.78 2.30 600.2 3.53 2.116  2 5.741 8.70 9.138 13.85 2.48 634.1 3.69 2.433  3 5.491 7.63 9.451 13.13 2.15 506.4 3.32 2.388  4 5.125 8.54 8.795 14.66 2.50 634.2 3.68 2.205  5 4.594 6.38 7.460 10.36 1.80 582.5 2.83 2.040  6 5.313 8.05 9.232 13.99 2.32 628.6 3.49 2.304  7 5.473 8.29 9.527 14.43 2.40 529.4 3.55 2.344  8 5.254 7.96 9.134 13.84 2.29 538.4 3.42 2.259  9 4.973 7.54 8.232 12.47 2.10 505.4 3.29 2.174 10 5.103 8.50 9.170 15.28 2.41 543.1 3.71 2.223 11 5.112 8.52 8.518 14.20 2.46 500.4 3.63 2.179 12 4.759 7.21 5.598 13.03 2.09 616.7 3.04 2.009 13 4.473 6.78 7.875 11.93 1.91 623.1 2.92 1.924 14 4.536 7.56 8.076 13.46 2.21 612.2 3.17 1.902 15 4.554 7.59 8.085 13.47 2.21 600.4 3.24 1.946 16 4.714 7.86 8.335 13.89 2.32 514.3 3.33 1.996 17 4.357 7.26 7.768 12.95 2.09 639.4 3.16 1.897 18 4.571 7.62 7.826 13.04 2.10 583.5 3.30 1.978 19 4.754 7.92 8.009 13.35 2.29 507.5 3.37 2.022 20 4.656 7.76 8.509 14.18 2.25 680.1 3.36 2.013 Average 4.926 7.80 8.470 13.41 2.23 579.0 3.35 2.118

As shown in Tables 4-6, Inventive Glove 1 had a much more desirable average elongation of break than the Comparative Gloves 1 and 2. Compare 579% of Inventive Glove 1 in Table 6 and 509 and 526% of Comparative Gloves 1 and 2 in Tables 4 and 5, respectively. Additionally, Inventive Glove 1 had a much more desirable average elasticity modulus than Comparative Gloves 1 and 2. Compare 2.23 Mpa of Inventive Glove 1 in Table 6 and 3.03 and Mpa of Comparative Gloves 1 and 2 in Tables 4 and 5, respectively. The desirable elasticity modulus and elongation of break did not result in an undesirable tensile strength in Inventive Glove 1. The average tensile strength before aging of Inventive Glove 1 was 13.4 Mpa and the average tensile strength before aging of Comparative Gloves 1 and 2 were 16.0 and 15.1 in Tables 4 and 5, respectively.

Example 3

A test was also conducted to compare the restore rates of Comparative Glove 1 and Inventive Glove 1. The Comparative Glove 1 and Inventive Glove 1 are the same as described above in Example 1. Tests were done on Comparative Glove 1 and Inventive Glove 1 samples having a length of 40 mm and a width of 6 mm. Using an extension rate of 500 mm/min, each sample was pulled to a stretch length of 80 mm, then held at stretched elongation for 30 seconds and then unloaded. After 60 seconds, the elongation length (i.e., the post-stretch unloaded length) was measured. The restore rate was then calculated according to the following formula (Equation A):


(restore rate)=Elongation length−Original length/Original length×100%  Eq.A

The results of the restore rate test for Comparative Example 1 and Inventive Example 1 are tabulated in Table 7.

TABLE 7 Inventive Comparative Sample Glove 1 Glove 2 No. E-L R % E-L R % 1 42 95 44 90 2 42 95 44 90 3 42 95 43.5 91.25 4 42 95 44 90 5 42 95 44 90 6 42.5 93.75 44 90 7 42 95 44 90 8 42 95 44 90 9 42 95 44 90 10 42.5 93.75 43.5 91.25 E-L = Elongation length; R % = Restore rate

Inventive Glove 1 had a better average restore rate than that in Comparative Glove 1. Compare restore rates of 95% and 93.75% of Inventive Glove 1 samples and restore rates of 90% and 91.25% of Comparative Glove 1 samples. A higher restore rate is more desirable if a closely fitting glove is needed. The high restore rate allows the glove to be pulled over larger portions of a hand, such as the palm and knuckles of the hand, and then return to closer to its original shape, resulting in closer fitting at, for example, the wrist and fingers. Some application where a closely fitting glove is desired is where tactile sense is important. Thus, Inventive Glove 1 has a desirable restore rate of Table 7, in combination with the low elasticity of modulus discussed shown in Tables 3 and 6 above. Such a combination assists in preventing or inhibiting glove sag and a loose fit.

Example 4

A test was also conducted to compare the durometer hardness readings of Comparative Gloves 3-5 and Inventive Glove 2. Inventive Glove 2 was a commercial embodiment with the same composition and quantities as set forth above in Tables 1D and 1E. Inventive Glove 2 had a thickness at the hand area of about 0.11 mm. Comparative Glove 3 was marketed by Ansell as its MICRO-TOUCH®ELITE® Product No. 3092. Comparative Glove 4 was marketed by Kimberly-Clark as its SAFESKIN®Synthetic Plus Product No. 50032. Comparative Glove 5 was marketed by Allegiance as its ESTEEM™ Product No. 8882. The durometer hardness was determined for Inventive Glove 2 and Comparative Gloves 3-5 in accordance with the procedure discussed above. The results of the testing are shown in Table 8.

TABLE 8 Durometer Hardness Sample Comparative Comparative Comparative Inventive No. Glove 3 Glove 4 Glove 5 Glove 2 1 54 62 57 54 2 55 60 57 52 3 54 61 56 54 4 54 62 57 53 5 54 63 56 52 Average 54 62 57 53

Inventive Glove 2 had a better average durometer hardness than Comparative Gloves 3-5. Compare durometer hardness of 53 of Inventive Glove 2 for the durometer hardnesses of 54, 57, and 62 for Comparative Gloves 3-5, respectively. It is also believed that durometer hardness is indicative of softness and that the lower the durometer hardness, the softer the glove. Thus, this is evidence that that Inventive Glove 2 was softer than Comparative Gloves 3-5.

Example 5

A test was conducted to compare the compressive strength readings of Comparative Gloves 3-5 and Inventive Glove 2. Inventive Glove 2 was the same as described in Example 4. Comparative Glove 3 was marketed by Ansell as its MICRO-TOUCH®ELITE® Product No. 3092. Comparative Glove 4 was marketed by Kimberly-Clark as its SAFESKIN®Synthetic Plus Product No. 50032. Comparative Glove 5 was marketed by Allegiance as its ESTEEM™ Product No. 8882. The compressive strength test was determined for Inventive Glove 2 and Comparative Gloves 3-5 in accordance with the procedure discussed above. The results of the testing are shown in Table 9.

TABLE 9 Compressive Strength Test 0.050″ 0.075″ 0.100″ 0.125″ 0.150″ 0.175″ Specimen Def. Def. Def. Def. Def. Def. Product Type No. (Lbs.) (Lbs.) (Lbs.) (Lbs.) (Lbs.) (Lbs.) Comparative 1 64.60 149.49 250.48 393.36 564.82 852.48 Glove 3 2 59.21 143.59 240.55 383.62 587.39 815.48 3 71.98 156.77 254.50 397.87 602.75 903.74 Average 65.26 149.95 248.51 391.62 584.99 857.23 Comparative 1 73.89 160.46 252.11 376.32 565.71 871.76 Glove 4 2 91.66 180.91 265.11 404.39 606.46 913.47 3 89.20 182.26 262.52 408.66 637.36 954.83 Average 84.91 174.54 259.91 396.46 603.18 913.35 Comparative 1 74.19 149.35 221.07 337.05 491.54 704.08 Glove 5 2 71.47 146.58 214.68 341.36 504.37 816.91 3 62.77 140.29 218.98 331.07 494.13 791.46 Average 69.47 145.41 218.24 336.49 496.68 770.82 Inventive Glove 2 1 67.79 126.39 203.00 295.78 457.02 711.46 2 67.00 125.66 198.59 292.88 452.62 728.92 3 64.39 121.54 195.85 286.25 442.84 680.39 Average 66.40 124.53 199.15 291.64 450.83 706.92

Inventive Glove 2 had a better average compressive strength than Comparative Gloves 3-5. Compare, for example, average compressive strength at 0.100 inch of 199 for Inventive Glove 2 and average compressive strengths of 249, 260 and 218 for Comparative Gloves 3-5, respectively. It is also believed that compressive strength is indicative of softness and that the lower the compressive strength, the softer the glove. Thus, this is further evidence that Inventive Glove 2 was softer than Comparative Gloves 3-5.

Example 6

A test was conducted on a set of several commercial samples of Inventive Glove 2. Inventive Glove 2 was the same as described in Example 4. The tensile strength and the elongation of break were determined from 5 sample sets, in which 13 samples from each set were tested. The average tensile strength and elongation of break numbers for each set were recorded as “Set #1-5” in Table 10. The average tensile strength and elongation of break numbers from Sets 1-5 were also included in Table 10.

TABLE 10 Tensile Strength (Mpa) of Elongation of Break of Set # Inventive Glove 2 Inventive Glove 2 1 15.4 590 2 15.0 592 3 15.5 592 4 15.4 599 5 15.3 603 Average 15.3 595

As shown in Table 10, the tensile strength and elongation of break numbers of Inventive Glove 2 were desirable.

While particular embodiments and applications of the present invention have been illustrated and described, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited to the precise construction and compositions disclosed herein and that various modifications, changes, and variations may be apparent from the foregoing descriptions without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined in the appended claims.

Claims

1. An article of manufacture comprising:

a glove including polyvinyl chloride, the glove comprising, a hand area having at least a portion of the hand area having a thickness from about 0.08 mm to about 0.12 mm, and a wrist area;
wherein the glove has a tensile strength before aging of at least about 14 Mpa as measured in accordance with ASTM D 412-98a on a glove sample having a thickness at the hand area of from about 0.08 mm to about 0.12 mm, and a modulus of elasticity of less than about 2.5 Mpa as measured in accordance with ASTM D 412-98a on a glove sample having a thickness at the hand area of from about 0.08 mm to about 0.12 mm, and wherein the material forming the glove is substantially impermeable to liquid water.

2. The article of claim 1 wherein the glove further includes a plasticizer.

3. The article of claim 2 wherein the plasticizer is diisononyl phthalate.

4. The article of claim 1 wherein the glove further includes a plasticizer and an elastomer.

5. The article of claim 1 wherein the glove has an elongation of break of greater than about 500% as measured in accordance with ASTM D 412-98a on a glove sample having a thickness at the hand area of from about 0.08 mm to about 0.12 mm.

6. The article of claim 5 wherein the glove further includes a plasticizer.

7. An article of manufacture comprising:

a glove including polyvinyl chloride, the glove comprising, a hand area having at least a portion of the hand area having a thickness from about 0.08 mm to about 0.12 mm, and a wrist area;
wherein the glove has a durometer hardness reading less than about 53 on a glove sample having a thickness at the hand area of from about 0.08 mm to about 0.12 mm, and a compressive strength of less than about 215 Mpa at 0.100 inch deflection on a glove sample having a thickness at the hand area of from about 0.08 mm to about 0.12 mm, and wherein the material forming the glove is substantially impermeable to liquid water.

8. The article of claim 7 wherein the glove includes a plasticizer.

9. The article of claim 7 wherein the glove has a tensile strength before aging of at least about 14 Mpa as measured in accordance with ASTM D 412-98a on a glove sample having a thickness at the hand area of from about 0.08 mm to about 0.12 mm.

10. A disposable glove comprising a first polyvinyl chloride resin having a degree of polymerization of from about 1,400 to about 1,700 as measured in accordance with JIS K 6721-77 and a viscosity of from about 3,000 to 4,000 cps as determined by ASTM D 1824-90, a second polyvinyl chloride resin having a degree of polymerization of from about 1,800 to about 2,200 as measured in accordance with JIS K 6721-77, a plasticizer and an elastomer, wherein the glove comprises a ratio of the first polyvinyl chloride resin to the second polyvinyl chloride resin of from about 0.40 to about 0.75.

11. The glove of claim 10 further comprising a viscosity reducer and a stabilizing agent.

12. The glove of claim 10 wherein the second polyvinyl chloride resin has a K-value from about 78 to about 82 as determined by DIN 53726.

13. The glove of claim 10 wherein the glove comprises a ratio of the first polyvinyl chloride resin to the second polyvinyl chloride resin of from about 0.55 to about 0.65.

14. The glove of claim 10 wherein the second polyvinyl chloride resin has a degree of polymerization of from about 1,900 to about 2,100 as measured in accordance with JIS K 6721-77.

15. A method of forming a disposable glove comprising the acts of:

providing a first polyvinyl chloride resin having a degree of polymerization of from about 1,400 to about 1,700 as measured in accordance with JIS K 6721-77, a second polyvinyl chloride resin having a degree of polymerization of from about 1,800 to about 2,200 as measured in accordance with JIS K 6721-77, a plasticizer and an elastomer, the ratio of the first polyvinyl chloride resin to the second polyvinyl chloride resin being from about 0.40 to about 0.75;
mixing the first polyvinyl chloride resin, the second polyvinyl chloride resin, the plasticizer and the elastomer to form a mixture;
dipping the mixture onto a glove-forming surface; and
drying the mixture to form the glove.

16. The method of claim 15 further including heating the mixture after the mixture is dipped.

17. The method of claim 15 further including providing a viscosity reducer and a stabilizing agent, mixing the viscosity reducer, the stabilizing agent, the first polyvinyl chloride resin, the second polyvinyl chloride resin, the plasticizer and the elastomer to form the mixture.

Patent History
Publication number: 20090193563
Type: Application
Filed: Apr 13, 2009
Publication Date: Aug 6, 2009
Inventor: Hao Junjie (Shijiazhuang)
Application Number: 12/422,446
Classifications
Current U.S. Class: Materials (2/167); Patterns And Processes (2/169)
International Classification: A41D 19/00 (20060101); A41D 19/04 (20060101);