Structure for an adjustable height work surfaces cooperating with linear extension mechanisms
A structural configuration of a under frame cooperating with linear extension mechanisms supports an adjustable height work surface with diagonal structural elements oriented and located to extend stability from the base objects to the WS directly, or proximate to an under frame location cooperating with the WS and further comprising under frame lateral structural elements that communicates a substantial fraction of both downward loads and horizontal torsional forces to the lower extents of the vertical structural elements resulting in improved stability of the vertically extended work surface.
This Application claims priority with application Ser. No. 62/230,368
BACKGROUNDA body of variable height, or elevated work surface prior art issued since the mid 1980's marks the period of heightened awareness of ergonomic considerations, focused mainly on use of computers. A couple of prior art under frame or substructures of a work surface with linear extension mechanisms were awarded in the in this period. Typically these designs were presenting a seated only ergonomic vertical adjustment range of a few inches. The need now is for a sitting to standing height work surface range that is four or five times greater, impacting the stability of the work surface at standing elevations. Prior art since then migrated to the superior stiffness of primarily closed telescopic extension mechanisms with lift assistance primarily utilizing motorized or hand cranked lead screw and nut mechanisms for each telescopic mechanism, or a horizontal torsion spring cooperating with a rack and pinion for each telescopic mechanism method originally awarded for drafting tables.
All of these prior art examples, even the alternative structures and lift methods reviewed incorporate a common structural feature: the parallel cantilever, or double sided cantilever components cooperating with the under frame vertical leg components proximate to their upper extents, and further cooperating with the work surface or WS. An attempt to lower the cost of these adjustable height WSs by substituting open linear extension mechanisms, and particularly low cost drawer slides or slides for the telescopic mechanisms initially failed due to two stability weaknesses inherent in these slides.
One stability weakness of the slides: minimal resistance to side loads exists, resulting in an unconstrained rocking motion in the XY plane about the Z axis shown in
There are known methods to provide this position retention including the remotely retractable pin and hole method, and the currently popular pair of lead screw motorized methods, and others, where these known methods can cooperate with the under frame and any cooperating base structure to provide this stability. The preferred location is for engaged position retention is the lower extents of the under frame proximate to the slides and tops of the base objects.
With the first problem addressed, a second problem was diagnosed. Introducing torsional forces in the plane of the work surface representing typical pressures or impacts from human interactions, the extended mechanisms naturally distort in opposite directions, one slide distorting rearward and the other distorting forward and also slightly rotationally about the vertical axis centered between the slides. Some movement is unavoidable due to material distortions under stress including the mild steel slide rails. However the distortion was unsatisfactory with springiness experienced in the work surface. The extended exposed inner rail exhibits torsional distortions in the vertical span between the upper and middle fastener locations lifting one side of this inner slide component from the co-planer surfaces of the cooperating vertical sides of the under frame, further twisting the extended mid rail that reduces its load bearing capability, thereby further enabling the increased deflections experienced.
It is important to recognize loads in drawer applications are uniformly distributed when tested, and the center of gravity of that load is between the ends of the mid rails, only half the extended distance traveled by the inner slide rail. This explains why one should expect problems if loads were directly applied near the ends of the inner rails, and particularly if a torsional force component is applied which these slides were not designed to encounter. One valid approach is to use more rigid construction, but that didn't seem to lead to lower costs, where redirecting a substantial fraction of the loads and torsional forces away from the upper extents of the vertical components of the substructure is the approach described herein.
Drawer slides share an application specific design. There are 3 slide rail components: the strongest is the fixed outer slide component, or outer rail, a middle slide component or mid rail, and the fully extended inner slide component or inner rail, where the mid rail further comprises 2 pairs of ball bearing linear arrays, the outer bearing arrays and the inner bearing arrays that cooperate with their respective rails. Both the outer and inner rails further comprise 3 spaced apart fastener locations at industry standard locations, the outer rail cooperating with fasteners to the base structure. One set proximate to the midpoint of the rail, and one set at either end. Preferred heavy duty slides provide two sets of fasteners proximate to the extending end of the outer rails, and hold higher loads at this cantilever fulcrum location for a drawer
When fully extended, the inner and outer bearing arrays constrained in the mid rail are centered in the middle of the overall mechanism that is proximate to the upper ends and fastener locations of the outer rails to the base. This fulcrum location is known to be the most rigid zone of the slide mechanism to communicate with the stability of the base, where position retention components cooperate with the base objects and the lower extents of the under frame proximate to this location in the standing height position. Lateral and torsional forces pass through the slides, and downward loads pass through the position retention components to the base.
Initially applied to an asymmetric work surface under frame, the telescopic extensions were replaced with linear extension mechanisms cooperating with vertical elements, and cantilever elements were discarded. New diagonal structural elements with first ends cooperating with the lower extents of the vertical structural elements proximate to the most rigid zone of the extended slides and stability of the base. These diagonal elements extend upward to communicate with the WS itself in fixed top implementations, or connect below the work surface with a coupling object further connected with added lateral structural elements that further connect with the upper extents of the vertical elements to complete a rigid under frame enabling it to support either fixed or manipulated WS implementations of asymmetric structures. Stretching this structural configuration width would accommodate wider WSs.
The fixed top symmetric free standing configuration discards double cantilevers, implementing double diagonal structural elements that cooperate with the other known structural elements found in prior art of height adjustable WS. The structural configuration is wider for these free standing applications, and the WS itself is contributing the horizontal structural elements in completing this shared structural configuration.
While diagonal structural elements are well known, they are not known or applied in this application, nor offer the benefits offered herein.
SUMMARYA structural configuration of a under frame cooperating with a WS comprising well known structural elements minus the cantilever elements, and further comprises diagonal elements described herein that extend stability from the base objects to the WS directly, or proximate to the under frame location cooperating with the WS, and thereby communicates a substantial fraction of both downward loads and horizontal torsional forces to the lower extents of the vertical structural elements thereby minimizing the remaining forces applied to the upper extents of these vertical structural elements resulting in significantly improved stability of the vertically extended work surface cooperating with linear extension mechanisms, particularly drawer slides.
BenefitsThe health benefits of more standing than sitting offer significant positive improvements in metabolic processes, circulation, posture and more, proven to improve one's health to those in need. Lower manufactured costs are the gateway to enabling more people to obtain these benefits.
This under frame structural configuration or structure enables a broader range of applications. It enables lower cost variable height WSs with satisfying stability for asymmetric models including: wall mounted, folding wall mounted, and mobile chassis configurations that may be further configured with: tilting, rotating, keyboard positioning, cable management, and other features as diverse as the applications are for WSs. The configuration also applies to symmetric free standing tables. The structural elements and mechanisms can be upgraded for demanding loads and greater scale and adaptable for changing proportions.
This structure reduces loads above the lower extents of the under frame expanding the choices of materials, manufacturing methods, and connection techniques that can be chosen to construct an under frame. It expands the industrial design and decorative opportunities as well.
Any chosen method of lift assistance can be configured to cooperate with this proposed structural configuration, where added structural components are anticipated for applying this assistance to the under frame. A light weight model not requiring lift assistance is a reasonable objective as well.
There are also ergonomic benefits, and the benefit to growing individuals who won't outgrow their WSs if they are more affordable. There are many public applications such as school desks, dorm room desks, and industry applications that choose to offer adjustable height benefits to their employees. Adjustable height lecterns and other specialized WS configurations: to support a large art canvas or cooperating with tools, fixtures, or equipment of any type are additional examples that may benefit from low cost adjustable height capability.
LimitationsFreedom of leg movement is somewhat comprised at the sitting elevations, which limits the designer, and may limit market acceptance. The structural configuration is not suitable for applications requiring maximum clearances beneath the WS.
This improved stability method would not apply to the normally oriented closed telescopic extension mechanisms. The lower extents of these elevated vertical structural objects are inaccessible. It can be utilized with inverted telescoping mechanisms, and open telescoping mechanisms in addition to other open linear extension methods, including suitable drawer slide mechanisms.
Ball bearings are exposed to the environment, and not recommended for outdoors.
In all applications, a work surface or WS as described herein, obtains its stability through its connections to a source of stability which is typically a stationary wall or floor or both. Stability connections include the connections from the floor or wall to one or more base objects, and through one or more cooperating connection pathways including the slide components, and position retention components cooperating with the lower extents of the under frame structure where this structural configuration or structure extends this stability directly or indirectly to the WS, and where WS tilting, sliding, or rotating mechanisms are additional mechanisms cooperating above the under frame, viewed as options above this under frame structure.
Stability describes lack of movement, in this case under stresses. Communicating stability in a structure generally implies rigid constraint of dimensions between structural attachment points, and the use of materials that are sufficiently rigid both in shape and proportions and alignment for the applied loads of the application to prevent movement. Extending stability describes an element extended from a location of stability at its first to the second end of the element where applied forces to the second end are resisted by stability without movement or distortion at the second.
This embodiment assumes a satisfactory communication of stability from a floor and or wall into a base structure, and particularly to the upper extents of the base pillars and the cooperating fixed outer rails and position retention devices attached thereto, the outer rails further communicating lateral stability through the slide components, and the cooperating position retention communicating vertical stability to the cooperating under frame structure.
The terms upper and lower extents refer to overlaying of this
Open linear extension mechanisms describe mechanisms where access to the inner slideable rail or partial tube is externally accessible where drawer slides are an example. The slides shown herein are common 3 rail component ball bearing slides, rated heavy duty, in lengths of 22 inches or more, providing 21.65 inches of extension.
While a typical WS under frame definition might reasonably include the slides and the base structures, the term under frame herein refers only to the adjustable elevated under frame objects involved in communicating stability to the WS, and further comprises only the cooperating elevated inner rail components of the slides. Some illustrations show the inner rails cooperating with the mid rail, and others show only the inner rail attached to the under frame.
The term elements herein identify axes between points, where the axes are extended beyond these points for clarity in
The base structure of asymmetric WS's may be: a stationary or mobile frame, or comprise a wall mounting structure and may be load bearing onto the floor. Models that fold against the wall are also asymmetric.
One or more additional structural elements are determined by the choice of lift assistance mechanisms and should be anticipated.
A symmetric free standing WS under frame represents a wider version of
Referring to
The lower first ends of the diagonal elements cooperate preferably with the lower first ends of the vertical elements of the under frame, a location when fully elevated, that is proximate to the most rigid zone of the extended slides and the position retention connections to the base structures.
While a straight rigid object is the clearest interpretation of these structural elements a non-straight object can also provide this structural rigidity.
The second ends of the diagonal elements may be located on the WS itself, or proximate to the WS mounting location, providing stability from the base to resist to both downward loads and torsional forces such as an impact to the WS from human interaction. Lateral elements stabilize the upper extents of the diagonal elements and communicate the remaining fraction of lateral forces from downward loads and torsional forces to the vertical elements. The result significantly reduces the total forces normally applied to the upper extents of the vertical objects by cantilever designs. The diagonal elements in either direct or indirect cooperation with the WS significantly improve the stability of the WS in cooperation with extended slides.
In fixed top applications, lateral elements 16a, 17a and element 13a are embodied in the rigid WS element 10a between the cooperating location points of the ends of the diagonals, and the top ends of the vertical elements cooperating with the WS.
The vertical elements, the transverse element 13a, and the panel element 13b are considered well known common structural elements of any adjustable height table under frame, and described as common elements. Lateral elements, when embodied in a WS, are similar to cantilevers in communicating lateral forces to the vertical elements, but may be positioned more directly in-line with torsional forces.
Two new elements 14a, 15a are described herein as diagonal elements, and can be varied in length and angular positioning to suit the proportions of different designs, but remain cooperating preferably with the lower extents of the vertical objects described as the ends of vertical elements. Raising this location above what is described as the preferred location will result in a less direct stability path. Positioning the first diagonal ends 2-5 inches from the bottom of the vertical objects is preferred. It will likely cease to provide much benefit when the first ends of diagonal structural objects approach the location of the upper ends of the extended mid rails.
Viewed from the top, these diagonal elements would project an approximate 35 degree inward rotation from a parallel cantilever orientation, described herein as zero degrees, where they conveniently extend up between ones knees when seated. This between the knees configuration of the diagonal elements is preferred for some asymmetric individual WS designs, and particularly for WS applications enabling folding, tilting, or rotating, but inward rotation of the diagonal elements is not required. It is not a requirement that diagonal objects converge inwardly if the torsional deflection of the WS is tolerable. No specific angular orientation is required to achieve the benefits of these structural objects. A preferred orientation is described later. Even if these objects were oriented in parallel similar to cantilever orientation with separate mounting brackets 18 further cooperating with embodied structural elements in the WS, they would still represent this under frame structural configuration, and provide its benefits.
A stretched wider version of
The common transverse element 13a, or a panel element 13b, and preferably both, in this configuration, maintain the distance between the vertical elements, embodied in the WS,
How to construct these under frames using the different materials and processes is well known to product designers familiar with a chosen material, to design parts for the processes associated with those materials. All modern manufacturing processes to achieve low cost and volume capabilities Involve considerable learning to be considered skilled in the art of designing for those processes
The structural configuration of the fixed top under frame amounts to adding 2 or more diagonal braces, without cantilevers or double cantilevers, cooperating with the other common structural elements, describes a shared structural configuration.
In the asymmetric structural configuration shown in
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
The
Common latching hardware would cooperate between the vertical objects and preferably the WS to retain the now folded vertical WS, where wall mounted base structures would be one anticipated configuration.
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
This WS itself further embodies: the double lateral elements 16a,17a, 16a′,17a′, the transverse element 13a in these configurations. Although different in appearance from
The diagonal elements in
Orienting the double diagonal elements parallel with cantilever orientations still directs a fraction of the applied forces to the lower extents that improves stability. Inward angles from this 0 degrees parallel orientation enable aligning the projection of the double diagonals toward the radial torsional forces increasing the fraction of the torsional forces communicated to the lower extents of the structure and improving torsional stability. The preferred orientation is described as aligning the projected locations of both ends of the diagonals on or proximate to the same radius from the center of the WS.
Referring to
This document contains no new matter.
Claims
1) An under frame structure of a work surface cooperating with linear extension mechanisms and position retention devices that in further cooperation with base structures, communicates stability therefrom to the underframe in height adjustable positions, the underframe structure comprising:
- a) vertical elements connected to the work surface;
- b) diagonal elements oriented and positioned proximate to said stability and operably linked thereto, extending therefrom to further operably communicate said stability to the work surface in height adjustable positions;
- c) work surface embodied lateral elements operably linked to said underframe structure where the larger fraction of off-center downward loads and torsional forces are communicated downward through the diagonal elements, the lateral elements communicating the minor fraction thereof to the upper extents of the vertical elements, thereby providing improving the stability of the work surface.
2) The under frame structure of claim 1 where a spreading apart of the vertical elements and the coupling element into separate elements provides a fixed top symmetric structure for free standing structures wherein:
- a) a second diagonal element extends from each vertical element symmetrically,
- b) the tops of the diagonal objects and the vertical objects further connected to the work surface,
- c) the embodied structural elements in the work surface complete this structure, enabling improved WS stability.
3) The under frame structure of claim 2 where a vertical elements and cooperating diagonal elements are comprised of one or more objects.
4) The under frame structure of claim 1 where an inward angular orientation of the diagonal elements preferably aligned with torsional forces improves resistance to these forces wherein:
- a) a preferred orientation for torsional resistance locates both connected ends of the diagonal elements proximate to the same radius from the axis of said torsional forces.
5) The underframe of claim 1 further comprising added structural objects to cooperate with a chosen method of lift assistance wherein:
- a) some methods of lift assistance also operably provide position retention, where these and other methods can provide the function of the position retention herein.
6) The under frame structure of claim 1 wherein said diagonal elements are further inclined inward and cooperate with a coupling object further connected to lateral elements that connect to the vertical elements, wherein:
- a) the work surface comprises an articulating device connected to the coupling element exclusively supporting the WS, enabling tilting or other articulation of the work surface, the under frame thereby providing the same improved stability and further enabling an articulating work surface.
7) The under frame structure of claim 6 where the connections of elements may be fixed, or pivotable, or embodied in objects to achieve various functionality and product objectives.
8) The under frame structure of claim 6 where lateral elements may be:
- a) embodied in the work surface
- b) rigidly or pivotably cooperating with connected elements,
- c) inclined in non-horizontal sloping orientations,
- d) comprised of one or more locking objects that cooperate with a device or method for unlocking the objects,
- e) embodied together in one or more objects,
- f) embodied in object pairs with a diagonal elements described as sides,
9) The under frame structure of claim 6 comprised of one or more objects that adequately retain the dimensions between the connections of the structural elements when subjected to anticipated downward loads and torsional forces, are not otherwise limited in shape or appearance.
10) The under frame structure of claim 10 provides the added function of a shelf below the work surface ideal for locating interconnections of electrical accessories.
11) The under frame structure of claim 6 comprised of one or more objects that may be molded, cast, or formed that cooperates with slides, a panel object, and the work surface, and further providing a multi-surface exterior thereby facilitating decorative opportunities for targeting markets, and where fewer parts is a cost advantage.
12) The underframe of claim 6 may further comprise added structural objects to cooperate with a chosen method of lift assistance wherein:
- a) some lift assistance methods also function as position retention mechanisms
- b) alternative methods of position retention as well as lift assistance are matters of choice.
Type: Application
Filed: Jun 1, 2016
Publication Date: Dec 8, 2016
Inventor: Thomas Toedtman (Taylor, TX)
Application Number: 15/170,759