Basic refractory shapes
A basic refractory shape resulting from firing a batch consisting essentially of a magnesite and a zirconia; said batch containing for each 100 percent by weight thereof about 3 to 20 percent by weight of coarse zirconia having a particle size of 150-mesh Tyler, or greater, and 0 to 20 percent by weight of fine zirconia having a particle size of finer than 150-mesh Tyler and a slide gate assembly comprising at least one such shape.
Latest Dresser Industries, Inc. Patents:
The present invention relates to basic refractory shapes, particularly those suitable for use in slide gate assemblies and nozzles for steel casting applications and for use in other metallurgical vessels where it is desired to have high thermal shock resistance and resistance to chemical erosion.
At the present time basic refractory shapes are used in steel casting applications; such as, for example, slide gates and nozzles. Basic refractories are those made of magnesium oxide, often referred to commercially as "deadburned magnesite" or simply "magnesite". Such slide gates or nozzles are principally used in the casting of high manganese steels since burned mullite-bonded high alumina slide gates or plates are much more susceptible to chemical attack by such steels.
Presently, however, such basic refractories do not have the desired degree of resistance to chemical erosion or thermal shock; particularly when attacked by molten steel and slag.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTIONIt has now been found that basic refractory shapes, particularly slide gates, nozzles and other refractory shapes utilized in the casting of steel, can be made more thermal shock resistant and resistant to chemical erosion; thus, leading to longer service life and minimizing the problems of chemical erosion and cracking from thermal shock.
Briefly, the present invention comprises a basic refractory shape resulting from firing a refractory batch consisting essentially of magnesite and zirconia; said batch containing for each 100 percent by weight thereof, 3 to 20 percent by weight of coarse zirconia having a particle size of 150-mesh Tyler, or greater, and 0 to 20 percent by weight of fine zirconia having a particle size of finer than 150-mesh Tyler.
DETAILED DESCRIPTIONThe essential elements of the instant invention are the magnesite and zirconia and, in particular, the relationship between the purity of the magnesite and the particle size of the zirconia.
With respect to the magnesite, it is preferred to use a pure magnesite that is greater than 98% by weight MgO. However, with the instant invention by adjusting the lime-to-silica ratio in the magnesite, it is possible to utilize magnesites that are much less pure; down, for example, to 96% by weight MgO, without any loss in the hot strength of the resultant refractory shape. This is done by regulating the amount of lime present in the magnesite grain in relation to the silica and, in particular, it has been found that even without adjustment of the lime-to-silica ratio, it is possible to get adequate refractoriness when using magnesites of less than 98% by weight purity if the proper amount and sizing of zirconia is used, as set forth in greater detail below.
The suitable lime-to-silica ratio depends on both the overall purity of the magnesite and the amount and sizing of the zirconia used. However, in all cases, the desired lime-to-silica ratio will be greater than 1.88 to 1, on a weight basis. As the magnesite used increases in purity, the influence of the lime-to-silica ratio is less critical.
With respect to the zirconia, it is preferred to use baddeleyite because it is inexpensive; although, any other zirconia such as synthetically prepared or fused zirconia or zirconia prepared from dissociation of zircon can also be utilized. The zirconia can either be used stabilized or unstabilized. It is well known in this art that it is common to stabilize zirconia with materials such as CaO, MgO, and Y.sub.2 O.sub.3. This stabilization is done to prevent conversion of the crystal structure from the cubic or tetragonal structure to the monoclinic structure on cooling. There is a volume change associated with this conversion of zirconia that could make the article friable and weak or subject to cracking. With the instant invention it is not necessary to stabilize the zirconia since if unstabilized zirconia is used it will be stabilized by the magnesium oxide during firing of the refractory-shaped form, for example, the slide gate or nozzle.
The proportions of magnesite and zirconia in the batch can range from 60 to 97 percent by weight magnesite and, correspondingly, 40 to 3 percent by weight zirconia.
A most important aspect of the instant invention and, in fact, critical is the sizing of the zirconia in order to achieve the desired spalling resistance. It is essential that there be from about 3 to 20 percent by weight of coarse zirconia having a particle size of 150-mesh Tyler, or greater. The essential component is the coarse zirconia for spalling resistance but, if it is desired to obtain optimum resistance to chemical attack from high manganese steels and slag, amounts of fine zirconia (i.e., less than 150-mesh Tyler) are preferably added; i.e., from about 1 to 20 percent by weight.
Interestingly, with the present invention, the particular amount of the fine and coarse zirconia utilized will vary within the ranges noted depending upon the type of magnesite (i.e., the purity thereof) as well as the particle size of the coarse zirconia. It has been noted that smaller amounts of the coarse zirconia are needed to give adequate spalling resistance as the particle size of the zirconia increases. The particular quantity and sizing of the coarse zirconia for any given magnesite and desired spalling resistance and chemical resistance can be determined by routine experimentation, simply adding it to the desired magnesite at the various levels and noting when the greatest spalling resistance and resistance to chemical attack is found.
A binder is added to bind the mix and assist it in holding the shape to which it is formed; as by pressing, during subsequent handling before it is fired. It can be any binder conventionally used in making basic refractories; such as lignosulphonates, methyl cellulose, dextrin, ethyl cellulose, and the like and in the conventional amount; about at least 2.5 percent by weight. These binders are burned out when the shape is fired.
It is also conventional to add as plus additions to the mixes other materials as processing aids. Oil and water, for example, can be added for purposes of proper lubrication during pressing and proper pressing consistency, respectively.
The particular refractory shapes can be made by simply admixing the magnesite, zirconia and binder, forming them into the desired shape; as by pressing, and firing them at temperatures of from about 2700.degree. to 3100.degree. F. as is conventional.
The invention will be further described in connection with the following examples which are set forth for purposes of illustration only.
EXAMPLES 1-7A series of seven tests were carried out with varying particle size zirconia and the spalling resistance measured. The particulars of each mix and the results of the testing are set forth in Table I below.
TABLE I
______________________________________
Example:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
______________________________________
Mix:
Deadburned
Magnesite
-10 on 28 mesh
49% 49% 49% 49% 48% 49% 48%
-28 mesh 23 18 17 18 17 17 14
BM 60 12 20 15 15 20 -- --
BM 90 16 8 8 3 10 25 23
Zirconia
A* -- 5 10 15 -- -- --
B** -- -- -- -- 5 10 15
Plus additions:
Lignosulfonate
3.9 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.8
Oil 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
Water 0.3 -- -- -- -- -- --
Burn: 2850.degree. F., 2 Hour Hold
*Less than 2 microns in particle size
**-35 on 65 mesh = 17%; -65 on 150 mesh 47%; -150 on 325 mesh = 36%; -32
mesh = 0%
% Linear Change
-0.2 -0.4 -0.4
-0.4 -0.2 0.0 +0.2
in Burning:
Bulk Density,
184 191 198 203 189 193 196
pcf, (Av 6):
Apparent Porosity,
16.4 15.4 14.2 14.5 17.0 17.2 17.7
% (Av 3):
Modulus of Rup-
ture, psi, (Av 3)
At Room Temp:
2180 4020 3780 3330 1350 1190 1070
At 2700.degree. F.:
1180 1060 1570 2250 380 350 690
Propane Oxygen
Flame
Impingement-POFI-
Test*
Degree of Cracking:
mod sl sev sl none none none
Degree of Spalling:
sl mod sl sl none none none
Rating: fail fail fail fail pass pass pass
______________________________________
*sl--slight; mod--moderate; sev--severe
These data show that Mix 1, with no zirconia addition, had poor spalling
resistance, as indicated by its failure to pass the POFI test. Mixes 2, 3
and 4, which contained fine zirconia, also failed the POFI test. However,
Mixes 5, 6, and 7, which contained coarser zirconia B passed the POFI
test.
EXAMPLES 8-13
A series of six tests were carried out relative to the coarseness of the zirconia and its effect on the POFI test. The particulars of each mix and the results of the tests are set forth in Table II below.
TABLE II
______________________________________
Example:
8 9 10 11 12 13
______________________________________
Mix:
Deadburned Magnesite
-10 on 28 mesh 49% 48% 49% 49% 49% 48%
-28 mesh 17 17 18 17 18 14
BM 60 20 20 15 -- 15 --
BM 90 9 10 8 25 3 23
Zirconia
BMF 80* 5 -- 10 -- 15 --
B -- 5 -- 10 -- 15
Plus additions:
Lignosulphonate
3.80
Oil 0.50
Burn: 2850.degree. F., 2 Hour Hold
% Linear Change in
-0.2 -0.2 -0.2 -0.0 -0.2 +0.2
Burning:
Bulk Density, pcf, (Av 6):
189 189 191 193 194 196
Apparent Porosity,
16.0 17.0 16.4 17.2 17.1 17.7
% (Av 3):
Modulus of Rupture,
psi, (Av 3)
At Room Temp: 2390 1350 2500 1190 2370 1070
At 2700.degree. F.:
540 380 850 350 1400 690
Propane Oxygen Flame
Impingement-POFI-Test
Degree of Cracking:
mod none mod none mod none
Degree of Spalling:
sev none sev none sev none
Rating: fail pass fail pass fail pass
______________________________________
*80% is -325 mesh Tyler
EXAMPLE 14
In Examples 2 to 4, and 8, 10 and 12, it was shown that compositions which contained fine zirconia with a particle size finer than 150 mesh had poor spalling resistance. A test was carried out showing that an acceptable level of spalling resistance could be attained in a composition that contained fine zirconia if a quantity of coarse zirconia sized greater than 150 mesh Tyler was also included in the composition. The mix and test results are set forth in Table III below.
TABLE III
______________________________________
Example: 14
______________________________________
Mix:
Deadburned Magnesite
10 on 28 mesh 47%
28 mesh 17
BM 55 10
BM 90 6
Zirconia
B 5
A 15
Plus additions:
Lignosulphonate 3.9
Oil 0.5
Burn: 2850.degree. F., 2 Hour Hold
% Linear Change in Burning:
-0.1
Bulk Density, pcf, (Av 5):
203
Apparent Porosity, %:
15.4
Modulus of Rupture,
psi, (Av 3)
At Room Temp: 1700
At 2700.degree. F.: 1420
Propane Oxygen Flame
passed
Impingement-POFI-Test:
______________________________________
The particular amount and sizing of coarse zirconia which has to be used with a particular amount and sizing of fine zirconia can be readily determined by routine experimentation.
EXAMPLES 15-20A series of six tests were carried out showing the hot modulus of rupture of the shapes from mixes with magnesite of various purities and the increase in such hot modulus by control of the lime to silica ratio or purity of the magnesite grain. The mix particulars an test results are set forth in Table IV below.
TABLE IV
__________________________________________________________________________
Example:
15 16 17 18 19 20
__________________________________________________________________________
Mix:
Deadburned Magnesite
95.2%
95% 95% 95% 95% 95.2%
Zirconia B 4.8 5 5 5 5 4.8
Plus additions:
VS Silica 0.23
-- -- -- -- 0.14
Lignosulphonate
3.71
3.9 3.9 3.9 3.8 3.71
Oil 0.48
0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.48
Density, pcf,:
186 188 188 185 189 188
Apparent Porosity, %:
17.2
17.5
17.8
18.2
17.0
17.4
Modulus of Rupture,
psi, (Av 3)
At Room Temp:
1770
1580
1230
1520
1350
1840
At 2700.degree. F.:
160 150 160 220 380 420
Mix Chemical Analysis
(Calcined Basis)
Silica 0.94%
0.44%
0.28%
0.12%
0.03%
0.88%
Alumina 0.21
0.17
0.14
0.11
0.07
0.20
Titania *0.01
0.02
0.02
0.01
0.01
*0.01
Iron Oxide 0.18
0.17
0.21
0.42
0.04
0.30
Chromic Oxide
*0.01
0.01
0.21
0.03
0.02
*0.01
Lime 2.20
1.16
1.24
0.80
0.72
2.20
Zirconia 4.32
4.00
4.48
4.80
4.93
4.33
Boron Oxide 0.013
0.005
0.017
0.009
*0.005
0.016
Total Analyzed
7.87%
5.98%
6.60%
6.3%
5.82%
7.94%
By Difference
Magnesia 92.13
94.02
93.40
93.7
94.18
92.06
Total 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
Lime-to-Silica Ratio:
2.34
2.64
4.43
6.62
2.4 2.50
Magnesite Chemistry
(Calcined Basis)
Silica 0.82%
0.45%
0.29%
0.18%
0.04%
0.82%
Alumina 0.16
0.18
0.09
0.09
0.10
0.16
Titania *0.01
0.01
*0.01
0.01
*0.01
*0.01
Iron Oxide 0.13
0.16
0.18
0.37
0.10
0.13
Chromic Oxide
*0.02
*0.01
0.21
*0.02
0.08
*0.02
Lime 2.30
1.17
1.23
0.60
0.54
2.30
Boron Oxide 0.024
*0.005
0.028
0.02
*0.005
0.024
Total Analyzed
3.43%
2.00%
2.03%
2.03%
0.86%
3.43%
By Difference
Magnesia 96.57
98.00
97.17
97.97
99.14
96.57
Total 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
__________________________________________________________________________
*Those chemistry numbers that are accompanied by asterisks indicate that
the limit of detectability was reached for that particular oxide. Thus,
the actual value is lower than that indicated.
EXAMPLE 21
The adjustment of the amount and sizing of the zirconia also makes it possible to get adequate refractoriness with magnesites of lower purity. This is illustrated in this example in which the magnesite of Example 17 is used but with the type of zirconia addition set forth in Table V below. The results are also shown in Table V.
TABLE V
______________________________________
Example: 21
______________________________________
Mix:
Magnesite 80%
Zirconia B 5
Zirconia A 15
Density, pcf: 202
Apparent Porosity, %: 15.7
Modulus of Rupture, psi
At Room Temperature: 1530
At 2700.degree. F.: 1120
POFI Test: passed
______________________________________
As is evident, even though a magnesite of purity less than 98.5% was used, a product with very high hot strength was obtained.
While the invention has been described in connection with a preferred embodiment, it is not intended to limit the scope of the invention to the particular form set forth, but, on the contrary, it is intended to cover such alternatives, modifications, and equivalents as may be included within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.
Claims
1. In a slide gate assembly comprising at least one plate of basic refractory material, the improvement comprising said at least one plate being one resulting from firing a batch consisting essentially of a magnesite and a zirconia; said batch consisting essentially of for each 100 percent by weight thereof about 3 to 20 percent by weight of coarse zirconia having a particle size of 150-mesh Tyler, or greater, and 0 to 20 percent by weight of fine zirconia having a particle size of finer than 150-mesh Tyler.
2. The slide gate assembly of claim 1 also including a nozzle of basic refractory material resulting from firing a batch consisting essentially of a magnesite and a zirconia; said batch consisting essentially of for each 100 percent by weight thereof about 3 to 20 percent by weight of coarse zirconia having a particle size of 150-mesh Tyler, or greater, and 0 to 20 percent by weight of fine zirconia having a particle size of finer than 150-mesh Tyler.
3. The slide gate assembly of claim 1 or 2 wherein said fine zirconia is present in an amount of from about 1 to 20 percent by weight.
4. The slide gate assembly of claim 1 or 2 wherein the lime-to-silica ratio in the magnesite is greater than about 1.88 to 1.
5. The slide gate assembly of claim 1 or 2 wherein the zirconia is baddeleyite.
| 3416938 | December 1968 | Alper et al. |
| 3520706 | July 1970 | Davies et al. |
| 4010039 | March 1, 1977 | de Aza et al. |
| 4179046 | December 18, 1979 | Jeschke et al. |
| 4220269 | September 2, 1980 | Beckers et al. |
| 4338963 | July 13, 1982 | Frame |
| 4415674 | November 15, 1983 | Johnson |
| 4461843 | July 24, 1984 | McGarry et al. |
| 4506022 | March 19, 1985 | Whittemore et al. |
| 49-096005 | September 1974 | JPX |
| 49-118708 | November 1974 | JPX |
| 0611246 | October 1948 | GBX |
| 1413522 | November 1975 | GBX |
| 1424826 | February 1976 | GBX |
Type: Grant
Filed: May 4, 1987
Date of Patent: Jul 11, 1989
Assignee: Dresser Industries, Inc. (Dallas, TX)
Inventors: Richard J. Knauss (Clairton, PA), David J. Michael (White Oaks, PA)
Primary Examiner: William R. Dixon, Jr.
Assistant Examiner: Anthony J. Green
Law Firm: Sigalos, Levine & Montgomery
Application Number: 7/46,238
International Classification: C04B 3548;
