Programmable interoperable appliance remote control

- Lear Corporation

A universal remote control establishes a new transmitter identifier when programmed to a particular rolling code scheme by an existing transmitter. During programming, the universal remote control receives at least one activation signal transmitted from the existing transmitter. The activation signal includes an existing transmitter identifier. The activation signal is examined to determine which of a plurality of rolling code schemes was used by the existing transmitter to generate the received activation signal. The new transmitter identifier, different from the existing transmitter identifier, is determined based on the rolling code scheme. Subsequently, when an activation input is received, the universal remote control generates and transmits a new activation signal including the new transmitter identifier.

Skip to: Description  ·  Claims  ·  References Cited  · Patent History  ·  Patent History
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention

The present invention relates to wireless remote control of appliances such as, for example, garage door openers.

2. Background Art

Home appliances, such as garage door openers, security gates, home alarms, lighting, and the like, may conveniently be operated from a remote control. Typically, the remote control is purchased together with the appliance. The remote control transmits a radio frequency activation signal which is recognized by a receiver associated with the appliance. Aftermarket remote controls are gaining in popularity as such devices can offer functionality different from the original equipment remote control. Such functionality includes decreased size, use with multiple appliances, increased performance, and the like. Aftermarket controllers are also purchased to replace lost or damaged controllers or to simply provide another remote control for accessing the appliance.

An example application for aftermarket remote controls are remote garage door openers integrated into an automotive vehicle. These integrated remote controls provide customer convenience, increased safety, multiple door operation, and enhanced vehicle value. Present in-dash vehicle integrated remote controls provide a “universal” or programmable garage door opener which learns characteristics of an existing transmitter then, when prompted by a user, generates an activation signal having the same characteristics.

Two types of activation signals are commonly used, those based on a fixed code and those based on a rolling code. Fixed code activation signals transmit the same code word with each activation transmission. Typically, the fixed code word may be set by the user in the receiver and any transmitters. This may be accomplished by setting jumpers or DIP switches to a matching pattern in the receiver and transmitters.

In contrast, rolling code activation signals include a different code word with each activation transmission. The rolling code code word is typically generated by encrypting a counter value with a crypt key. The crypt key is based on a transmitter identifier number maintained by the transmitter.

Rolling code appliance receivers must “learn” a transmitter before the transmitter can be used to activate the appliance. This is done by placing the receiver in learn mode and then keying the transmitter to send an activation signal. The activation signal includes the transmitter identifier and a rolling code word. The receiver uses the transmitter identifier to generate a crypt key. The receiver then uses the crypt key to decrypt the rolling code word, yielding a counter value. The receiver stores the counter value and crypt key associated with the transmitter identifier. The receiver then drops out of learn mode and is ready for normal operation.

One advantage of rolling code activation schemes is the ability of an appliance receiver to reject previously transmitted activation signals. This prevents false activation from reflections as well as from unauthorized access by retransmission of an activation signal grabbed from the air. The receiver accomplishes this task by decrypting a received rolling code to obtain a counter value maintained by the transmitter. This counter value is compared to an expected counter value associated with the transmitter identifier received together with the decrypted rolling code. If the received counter value is less than the expected counter value, the receiver treats the received activation signal as an invalid signal.

A problem therefore arises if two transmitters have the same transmitter identifier. After no more than one activation by either transmitter, one of the transmitters will have a counter value less than the other transmitter. When encrypted and transmitted, the lesser counter value will result in an activation signal ignored by the receiver, rendering that transmitter useless.

What is needed is a universal remote controller that may be programmed by an existing rolling code transmitter and then function together with the existing transmitter in activating an appliance.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention provides a universal remote control that establishes a new transmitter identifier when programmed to a particular rolling code scheme.

A method of activating an appliance remotely controllable by an existing transmitter is provided. The appliance responds to a radio frequency activation signal based on one of a plurality of rolling code schemes. At least one activation signal transmitted from an existing transmitter is received. The activation signal includes an existing transmitter identifier. The activation signal is examined to determine which of the plurality of rolling code schemes was used by the existing transmitter to generate the received activation signal. A new transmitter identifier, different from the existing transmitter identifier, is determined based on the rolling code scheme. A new activation signal including the new transmitter identifier is transmitted based on the determined rolling code scheme.

In an embodiment of the present invention, the new activation signal is transmitted after receiving an activation input. Similarly, the determination as to which rolling scheme was used by the existing transmitter follows reception of a programming mode input.

In another embodiment of the present invention, determination is made as to whether the received activation signal is based on one of a plurality of fixed code schemes or on one of a plurality of variable code schemes. If the received activation signal is based on one of the fixed code schemes, a fixed code received in the activation signal is stored. The stored fixed code is used to transmit an activation signal.

Determining whether the received activation signal is based on one of the fixed code schemes may include receiving at least two activation signals from the existing transmitter and comparing at least corresponding portions of the received signals to determine any differences.

A system for operating an appliance is also provided. The system includes a receiver and a transmitter. Control logic operates in a learn mode to determine and store a new transmitter identifier different from any existing transmitter identifier received in at least one rolling code activation signal transmitted by the existing transmitter. In an operate mode, the control logic generates a new activation signal different from any activation signal transmitted by the existing transmitter. The new activation signal includes the new transmitter identifier.

A method of programming a programmable radio frequency appliance remote control is also provided. A signal, based on one of a plurality of activation schemes, is received from an existing radio frequency remote control. A determination is made as to whether the received signal was generated using one of a plurality of rolling code activation schemes. If so, an indication as to which rolling scheme was used to generate the received signal is stored. A new transmitter identifier, different from an existing transmitter identifier associated with the existing transmitter, is also determined and stored.

The above features, and other features and advantages of the present invention are readily apparent from the following detailed description thereof when taken in connection with the accompanying drawings.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrating an appliance control system according to an embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram illustrating activation signal characteristics according to an embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 3 is a block diagram illustrating rolling code operation that may be used with the present invention;

FIG. 4 is a block diagram of an appliance controller according to an embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 5 is a block diagram illustrating control logic and a user interface according to an embodiment of the present invention; and

FIG. 6 is a flow diagram illustrating universal controller operation according to an embodiment of the present invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

Referring to FIG. 1, a block diagram illustrating an appliance control system according to an embodiment of the present invention is shown. An appliance control system, shown generally by 20, allows one or more appliances to be remotely controlled using radio transmitters. In the example shown, radio frequency remote controls are used to operate a garage door opener. However, the present invention may be applied to controlling a wide variety of appliances such as other mechanical barriers, lighting, alarm systems, temperature control systems, and the like.

Appliance control system 20 includes garage 22 having a garage door, not shown. Garage door opener (GDO) receiver 24 receives radio frequency control signals 26 for controlling a garage door opener. Activation signals 26 have a transmission scheme which may be represented as a set of receiver characteristics. One or more existing transmitters (ET) 28 generate radio frequency activation signals 26 exhibiting the receiver characteristics in response to a user depressing an activation button.

A user of appliance control system 20 may wish to add a new transmitter to system 20. For example, vehicle-based transmitter 30 may be installed in vehicle 32, which may be parked in garage 22. Vehicle-based transceiver 30 receives at least one activation signal 26 from existing transmitter 28. Vehicle-based transmitter 30 determines whether existing transmitter 28 operates using a fixed code scheme or a rolling code scheme by examining activation signal 26. If a rolling code scheme is used, vehicle-based transceiver 30 determines a new transmitter identifier compatible with the scheme used to generate activation signal 26. The new transmitter identifier is different from the transmitter identifier used by existing transmitter 28. Transceiver 30 generates activation signal 34 which, for rolling code systems, is different from an activation signal 26 sent by existing transmitter 28. This allows both existing transmitter 28 and vehicle-based transceiver 30 to be used with garage door opener receiver 24.

Referring now to FIG. 2, a schematic diagram illustrating activation signal characteristics according to an embodiment of the present invention is shown. Information transmitted in an activation signal is typically represented as a binary data word, shown generally by 60. Data word 60 may include one or more fields, such as transmitter identifier 62, function indicator 64, code word 66, and the like. Transmitter identifier (TRANS ID) 62 uniquely identifies a remote control transmitter. Function indicator 64 indicates which of a plurality of functional buttons on the remote control transmitter were activated. Code word 66 helps to prevent misactivation and unauthorized access.

Several types of codes 66 are possible. One type of code is a fixed code, wherein each transmission from a given remote control transmitter contains the same code 66. In contrast, variable code schemes change the bit pattern of code 66 with each activation. The most common variable code scheme, known as rolling code, generates code 66 by encrypting a counter value. After each activation, the counter is incremented. The encryption technique is such that a sequence of encrypted counter values appears to be random numbers.

Data word 60 is converted to a baseband stream, shown generally by 70, which is an analog signal typically transitioning between a high voltage level and a low voltage level. Various baseband encoding or modulation schemes are possible, including polar signaling, on-off signaling, bipolar signaling, duobinary signaling, Manchester signaling, and the like. Baseband stream 70 has a baseband power spectral density, shown generally by 72, centered around a frequency of zero.

Baseband stream 70 is converted to a radio frequency signal through a modulation process shown generally by 80. Baseband stream 70 is used to modulate one or more characteristics of carrier 82 to produce a broadband signal, shown generally by 84. Modulation process 80, mathematically illustrated by multiplication in FIG. 2, implements a form of amplitude modulation commonly referred to as on-off keying. As will be recognized by one of ordinary skill in the art, many other modulation forms are possible, including frequency modulation, phase modulation, and the like. In the example shown, baseband stream 70 forms envelope 86 modulating carrier 82. As illustrated in broadband power spectral density 88, the effect of modulation in the frequency domain is to shift baseband power spectral density 72 to be centered around the carrier frequency, f, of carrier 82.

Referring now to FIG. 3, a block diagram illustrating rolling code operation that may be used with the present invention is shown. Remotely controlled systems using rolling code require crypt key 100 in both the transmitter and the receiver for normal operation. Typically, crypt key 100 is generated using key generation algorithm 102 based on transmitter identifier 62 and a manufacturing (MFG) key 104. Crypt key 100 and transmitter identifier 62 are then stored in a particular transmitter. Counter 106 is also initialized in the transmitter. Each time an activation signal is sent, the transmitter uses encrypt algorithm 108 to generate rolling code 110 from counter 106 using crypt key 100. The transmitted activation signal includes rolling code 110 and transmitter identifier 62.

A rolling code receiver is trained to a compatible transmitter prior to operation. The receiver is placed into a learn mode. Upon reception of an activation signal, the receiver extracts transmitter identifier 62. The receiver then uses key generation algorithm 102 with manufacturing key 104 and received transmitter identifier 62 to generate crypt key 100 identical to the crypt key used by the transmitter. Newly generated crypt key 100 is used by decrypt algorithm 112 to decrypt rolling code 110, producing counter 114 equal to counter 106. The receiver then saves counter 114 and crypt key 100 associated with transmitter identifier 62. As is known in the encryption art, encrypt algorithm 108 and decrypt algorithm 112 may be the same algorithm.

In normal operation, when the receiver receives an activation signal, the receiver first extracts transmitter identifier 62 and compares transmitter identifier 62 with all learned transmitter identifiers. If no match is found, the receiver rejects the activation signal. If a match is found, the receiver retrieves crypt key 100 associated with received transmitter identifier 62 and decrypts rolling code 110 from the received activation signal to produce counter 114. If received counter 106 matches counter 114 associated with transmitter identifier 62, activation proceeds. Received counter 106 may also exceed stored counter 114 by a preset amount for successful activation.

Another rolling code scheme generates crypt key 100 based on manufacturing key 104 and a “seed” or random number. An existing transmitter sends this seed to an appliance receiver when the receiver is placed in learn mode. The transmitter typically has a special mode for transmitting the seed entered, for example, by pushing a particular combination of buttons. The receiver uses the “seed” to generate crypt key 100. As will be recognized by one of ordinary skill in the art, the present invention applies to the use of a “seed” for generating a crypt key as well as to any other variable code scheme.

Referring now to FIG. 4, a block diagram of a wireless transceiver that may be used to implement the present invention is shown. Wireless transceiver 30 includes a receiver section, shown generally by 120, and a transmitter section, shown generally by 122. Receiver section 120 includes antenna 124, sampler 126, digital radio frequency memory (DRFM) 128, detector 130 and control logic 132. Control logic 132 monitors the output of detector 130, which receives input from antenna 124. When control logic 132 detects valid data from detector 130, control logic 132 waits until a period when the carrier is present on the signal received on antenna 124. Control logic 132 asserts the “record” input to DRFM 128. By asserting “play” and “select,” control logic 132 can shift the sampled carrier from DRFM 128 into control logic 132 over bus 134.

Transmitter section 122 includes antenna 136, which may be the same as antenna 124, filter 138, variable gain amplifier 140, DRFM 128 and control logic 132. Control logic 132 can load DRFM 128 with a sampled carrier stream by asserting “select” and “record,” then shifting the carrier stream into DRFM 128 on bus 134. The bit stream representing a carrier may have been previously received and sampled or may have been preloaded into control logic 132. Control logic 132 generates a modulated carrier on DRFM output 142 by asserting the “play” control line with the desired data word. The amplitude modulated signal on DRFM output 142 is amplified by variable gain amplifier 140 and filtered by filter 138 before transmission by antenna 136.

A DRFM transceiver similar to the system illustrated in FIG. 4 is described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/306,077, entitled “Programmable Transmitter and Receiver Including Digital Radio Frequency Memory,” filed Nov. 27, 2002, which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety.

Referring now to FIG. 5, a block diagram illustrating control logic and a user interface according to an embodiment of the present invention is shown. Control logic 132 may be implemented with microcontroller 150 including one or more processors, volatile memory, scratch memory, interface electronics, and the like. Alternatively, or in addition to microcontroller 150, control logic 132 may be implemented with discrete analog and/or digital components, programmable logic devices, custom integrated circuits, and the like.

A user interface, shown generally by 152, provides means for accepting input from a user and for displaying output to a user. The example illustrated in FIG. 5 supports three channels. Each channel includes a pushbutton, one of which is indicated by 154, and an indicator lamp, one of which is indicated by 156. Each pushbutton 154 drives a digital input (DI) on microcontroller 150. Each lamp 156 is driven by a digital output (DO) on microcontroller 150. Pushbuttons 154 may be used as activation and programming mode inputs.

Microcontroller 150 provides DRFM control signals 158 described above as “play,” “record” and “select.” Microcontroller 150 implements bus 134 using serial data line 160 and serial clock line 162. Microcontroller 150 provides variable amplifier control 164 from an analog output (AO). Alternatively, variable amplifier 140 may be controlled by a digital output from microcontroller 150 which is converted into an analog signal by an external analog-to-digital converter. Finally, microcontroller 150 includes digital input detector data 166 for sampling the output of detector 130 during learn mode.

Referring now to FIG. 6, a flow diagram illustrating universal controller operation according to an embodiment of the present invention is shown. As will be appreciated by one of ordinary skill in the art, the operations illustrated are not necessarily sequential operations. Similarly, operations may be performed by software, hardware, or a combination of both. The present invention transcends any particular implementation and the aspects are shown in sequential flow chart form for ease of illustration.

User input is received, as in block 170. For example, microcontroller 150 can detect a depression of pushbutton switch 154. The desired function is identified, as in block 172. If pushbutton 154 is held for a brief period of time, the user is providing an activation input. If the user depresses pushbutton 154 for an extended period of time, the user places the channel represented by pushbutton 154 into learn mode.

A determination is made as to whether or not the programmable controller is in learn mode, as in block 174. If so, one or more signals from existing transmitters are received, as in block 176. Programmable controller 30 preferably provides an output signal prompting the user to key existing transmitter 28. Once programmable transmitter 30 receives activation signal 26 from existing transmitter 28, a determination is made as to whether or not activation signal 26 uses rolling code, as in block 178. One method for determining whether activation signal 26 is a fixed code signal or a rolling code signal is to have the user key existing transmitter 28 twice. If activation signal 26 is the same in both instances, activation 26 is a fixed code signal. If the data word in activation 26 varies between the two transmissions, activation signal 26 is a rolling code signal.

If the received activation signal is not a rolling code signal, the fixed code scheme is identified, as in block 180. The scheme used to generate activation signal 26 may be determined from one or more characteristics of activation signal 26. These characteristics include the number of bits transmitted, the base band data rate, the base band modulation scheme, the broadband frequency, the broadband modulation scheme, and the like. Once the fixed code scheme is identified, the fixed code is extracted and stored, as in block 182.

Returning to block 178, if received activation signal 26 was generated using a rolling code scheme, the rolling code scheme is identified, as in block 184. Once again, identifying the rolling code scheme may be accomplished by examining the characteristics of activation signal 26. The rolling code scheme may also be identified through programming mode input. A check is made in block 186 to determine if the crypt key was sent in transmission 26, as in block 186. If not, a new transmitter identifier is determined, as in block 188. A crypt key is generated, as in block 190, using the new transmitter identifier and/or a random number seed sent in transmission signal 26. If the crypt key was sent in signal 26, the crypt key is obtained from the existing transmitter, as in block 192. The crypt key, transmitter identifier, and any other relevant information is stored in memory associated with the channel being trained.

Returning now to block 174, if user input indicates an activation input was received, a data word is constructed, as in block 194. Construction of the data word is based on the identified fixed or rolling code scheme associated with the activation input channel. In the case of a rolling code scheme, the data word includes the new transmitter identifier and a rolling code value. A carrier is modulated with the data word, as in block 196, and transmitted as activation signal 34.

Once transceiver 30 has been programmed to generate a rolling code activation signal, appliance receiver 24 is trained to learn new transmitter identifier 62 held by transceiver 30. This is accomplished by placing appliance receiver 24 in learn mode and activating the appropriate input channel on transceiver 30.

While embodiments of the invention have been illustrated and described, it is not intended that these embodiments illustrate and describe all possible forms of the invention. Rather, the words used in the specification are words of description rather than limitation, and it is understood that various changes may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.

Claims

1. A method of activating an appliance remotely controllable by an existing transmitter, the appliance responding to a radio frequency activation signal based on one of a plurality of rolling code schemes, the method comprising:

receiving at least one activation signal transmitted from the existing transmitter, the activation signal including an existing transmitter identifier;
examining the at least one received activation signal to determine which of the plurality of rolling code schemes was used by the existing transmitter to generate the received activation signal;
determining a new transmitter identifier different from the existing transmitter identifier based on the determined rolling code scheme; and
transmitting a new activation signal based on the determined rolling code scheme, the new activation signal including the new transmitter identifier.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein the new activation signal is transmitted based on receiving an activation input.

3. The method of claim 1 wherein the determination of which rolling code scheme was used by the existing transmitter is based on receiving a programming mode input.

4. The method of claim 1 wherein the appliance responds to a radio frequency activation signal based on one of a plurality of fixed code schemes or one of the plurality of rolling code schemes, the method further comprising:

determining whether the received activation signal is based on one of the plurality of fixed code schemes or on one of the plurality of rolling code schemes; and
if the received activation signal is based on one of the fixed code schemes, storing a fixed code received in the activation signal and using the stored fixed code to transmit an activation signal.

5. The method of claim 4 wherein determining whether the received activation signal is based on one of the fixed code schemes comprises:

receiving at least two activation signals from the existing transmitter; and
comparing at least a portion of the at least two received activation signals to determine any differences.

6. A system for operating an appliance, the appliance responding to an activation signal transmitted from an existing radio frequency transmitter, the system comprising:

a receiver operable to receive any of a plurality of radio frequency activation signals;
a transmitter operable to transmit any of the plurality of radio frequency activation signals; and
control logic in communication with the receiver and the transmitter, the control logic operating in a learn mode and an operate mode, the control logic in learn mode determining and storing a new transmitter identifier different from any existing transmitter identifier received in at least one rolling code activation signal transmitted by the existing transmitter, the control logic in operate mode generating a new activation signal different from any activation signal transmitted by the existing transmitter, the new activation signal including the new transmitter identifier.

7. The system of claim 6 wherein the control logic supports a plurality of channels, each channel programmable to a different existing transmitter.

8. The system of claim 6 further comprising a user interface placing the control logic in learn mode based on a first user input and causing transmission of the new activation signal based on a second user input.

9. The system of claim 6 wherein the control logic is operable in learn mode to determine whether the at least one activation signal transmitted by the existing transmitter is based on a rolling code scheme or a fixed code scheme.

10. The system of claim 9 wherein, if the at least one activation signal transmitted by the existing transmitter is a fixed code scheme, the control logic extracting and storing a fixed code from the at least one activation signal transmitted by the existing transmitter.

11. The system of claim 10 wherein the control logic in operate mode generates an activation signal including the stored fixed code.

12. The system of claim 9 wherein the control logic is operable to determine fixed code scheme or rolling code scheme based on at least two activation signals transmitted by the existing transmitter.

13. The system of claim 6 wherein the control logic determines which of a plurality of rolling code schemes was used by the existing transmitter based on receiving a programming mode input.

14. A method of programming a programmable radio frequency appliance remote control comprising:

receiving a signal from an existing radio frequency remote control, the signal based on one of a plurality of activation schemes;
determining if the received signal was generated using one of a plurality of rolling code activation schemes;
if so, storing an indication as to which rolling code scheme was used to generate the received signal; and
determining and storing a new transmitter identifier different from an existing transmitter identifier associated with the existing transmitter.

15. The method of claim 14 further comprising:

receiving an activation input signal; and
transmitting a new activation signal based on the stored rolling code scheme indication and on the new transmitter identifier.

16. The method of claim 14 further comprising:

determining if the received signal was generated using one of a plurality of fixed code activation schemes;
if so, storing an indication as to which fixed code scheme was used to generate the received signal; and
extracting and storing a fixed code from the received signal.

17. The method of claim 16 further comprising:

receiving an activation input signal; and
transmitting a new activation signal based on the stored fixed code scheme indication and on the stored fixed code.

18. The method of claim 14 wherein receiving a signal from the existing radio frequency remote control comprises receiving a plurality of signals from the existing radio frequency remote control and wherein determining if the received signal was generated using one of the plurality of rolling code activation schemes is based on an examination of at least two of the plurality of received signals.

19. The method of claim 14 wherein the determination of which rolling code scheme was used to generate the received signal is based on receiving a programming mode input.

Referenced Cited
U.S. Patent Documents
1522241 January 1925 Hennessey
3098212 July 1963 Creamer, Jr.
3300867 January 1967 Sampson
3337992 August 1967 Tolson
3456387 July 1969 Tolson
3680951 August 1972 Jordan et al.
4074200 February 14, 1978 Buchta
4167833 September 18, 1979 Farina et al.
4178549 December 11, 1979 Ledenbach et al.
4219812 August 26, 1980 Rittenbach
4241870 December 30, 1980 Marcus
4247850 January 27, 1981 Marcus
4425717 January 17, 1984 Marcus
4447808 May 8, 1984 Marcus
4453161 June 5, 1984 Lemelson
4482947 November 13, 1984 Zato et al.
4529980 July 16, 1985 Liotine et al.
4535333 August 13, 1985 Twardowski
4581827 April 15, 1986 Higashi
4595228 June 17, 1986 Chu
4598287 July 1, 1986 Osakabe et al.
4623887 November 18, 1986 Welles, II
4631708 December 23, 1986 Wood et al.
4635033 January 6, 1987 Inukai et al.
4638433 January 20, 1987 Schindler
4665397 May 12, 1987 Pinnow
4676601 June 30, 1987 Itoh et al.
4700327 October 13, 1987 Hilton
4706299 November 10, 1987 Jorgensen
4707788 November 17, 1987 Tashiro et al.
RE32576 January 12, 1988 Pastore
4727302 February 23, 1988 Mizuta et al.
4743905 May 10, 1988 Wiegand
4747159 May 24, 1988 Kato
4750118 June 7, 1988 Heitschel et al.
4754255 June 28, 1988 Sanders et al.
4771283 September 13, 1988 Imoto
4793690 December 27, 1988 Gahan et al.
4799189 January 17, 1989 Grover
4806930 February 21, 1989 Wojciak, Jr.
4825200 April 25, 1989 Evans et al.
4881148 November 14, 1989 Lambropoulos et al.
4882565 November 21, 1989 Gallmeyer
4886960 December 12, 1989 Molyneux et al.
4890108 December 26, 1989 Drori et al.
4896030 January 23, 1990 Miyaji
4905279 February 27, 1990 Nishio
4912463 March 27, 1990 Li
4917477 April 17, 1990 Bechtel et al.
4953305 September 4, 1990 Van Lente et al.
4978944 December 18, 1990 Andros et al.
4988992 January 29, 1991 Heitschel et al.
5016996 May 21, 1991 Ueno
5064274 November 12, 1991 Alten
5085062 February 4, 1992 Capdevila
5103221 April 7, 1992 Memmola
5109222 April 28, 1992 Welty
5113821 May 19, 1992 Fukui et al.
5122647 June 16, 1992 Lynam et al.
5123008 June 16, 1992 Beesley
5126686 June 30, 1992 Tam
5146215 September 8, 1992 Drori
5154617 October 13, 1992 Suman et al.
5181423 January 26, 1993 Philipps et al.
5191610 March 2, 1993 Hill et al.
5193210 March 9, 1993 Nicholas et al.
5201067 April 6, 1993 Grube et al.
5225847 July 6, 1993 Roberts et al.
5243322 September 7, 1993 Thompson et al.
5252960 October 12, 1993 Duhame
5252977 October 12, 1993 Lueker et al.
5266945 November 30, 1993 Peek et al.
5278547 January 11, 1994 Suman et al.
5369706 November 29, 1994 Latka
5379453 January 3, 1995 Tigwell
5402105 March 28, 1995 Doyle et al.
5408698 April 18, 1995 Serizawa et al.
5412379 May 2, 1995 Waraksa et al.
5420925 May 30, 1995 Michaels
5442340 August 15, 1995 Dykema
5455716 October 3, 1995 Suman et al.
5463374 October 31, 1995 Mendez et al.
5471668 November 28, 1995 Soenen et al.
5473317 December 5, 1995 Inomata et al.
5475366 December 12, 1995 Van Lente et al.
5479155 December 26, 1995 Zeinstra et al.
5517187 May 14, 1996 Bruwer et al.
5528230 June 18, 1996 Kim
5554977 September 10, 1996 Jablonski et al.
RE35364 October 29, 1996 Heitschel et al.
5564101 October 8, 1996 Eisfeld et al.
5583485 December 10, 1996 Van Lente et al.
5594429 January 14, 1997 Nakahara
5596316 January 21, 1997 Honeck
5598475 January 28, 1997 Soenen et al.
5613732 March 25, 1997 Demick
5614885 March 25, 1997 Van Lente et al.
5614891 March 25, 1997 Zeinstra et al.
5619190 April 8, 1997 Duckworth et al.
5627529 May 6, 1997 Duckworth et al.
5645308 July 8, 1997 Fink
5646701 July 8, 1997 Duckworth et al.
5661455 August 26, 1997 Van Lente et al.
5661651 August 26, 1997 Geschke et al.
5661804 August 26, 1997 Dykema et al.
5680131 October 21, 1997 Utz
5680134 October 21, 1997 Tsui
5686903 November 11, 1997 Duckworth et al.
5686904 November 11, 1997 Bruwer
5691848 November 25, 1997 Van Lente et al.
5699044 December 16, 1997 Van Lente et al.
5699054 December 16, 1997 Duckworth
5699055 December 16, 1997 Dykema et al.
5708415 January 13, 1998 Van Lente et al.
5715020 February 3, 1998 Kuroiwa et al.
5731756 March 24, 1998 Roddy
5751224 May 12, 1998 Fitzgibbon
5793300 August 11, 1998 Suman et al.
5812097 September 22, 1998 Maldonado
5831548 November 3, 1998 Fitzgibbon
5838255 November 17, 1998 Di Croce
5841253 November 24, 1998 Fitzgibbon et al.
5841390 November 24, 1998 Tsui
5841813 November 24, 1998 Van Nee
5845593 December 8, 1998 Birkestrand
5854593 December 29, 1998 Dykema et al.
5872513 February 16, 1999 Fitzgibbon et al.
5903226 May 11, 1999 Suman et al.
5926087 July 20, 1999 Busch et al.
5926106 July 20, 1999 Beran et al.
5940000 August 17, 1999 Dykema
5940007 August 17, 1999 Brinkmeyer
5940120 August 17, 1999 Frankhouse et al.
5949349 September 7, 1999 Farris et al.
6002332 December 14, 1999 King
6005508 December 21, 1999 Tsui
6008735 December 28, 1999 Chiloyan et al.
6009355 December 28, 1999 Obradovich et al.
6021319 February 1, 2000 Tigwell
6025785 February 15, 2000 Farris et al.
6031465 February 29, 2000 Burgess
6043753 March 28, 2000 Okayasu et al.
6049289 April 11, 2000 Waggamon et al.
6055508 April 25, 2000 Naor et al.
RE36703 May 16, 2000 Heitschel et al.
6072436 June 6, 2000 Marougi
6078271 June 20, 2000 Roddy et al.
6081203 June 27, 2000 Fitzgibbon
6091343 July 18, 2000 Dykema et al.
6104101 August 15, 2000 Miller et al.
6127740 October 3, 2000 Roddy et al.
6130625 October 10, 2000 Harvey
6131019 October 10, 2000 King
6137421 October 24, 2000 Dykema
6154544 November 28, 2000 Farris et al.
6166650 December 26, 2000 Bruwer
6175312 January 16, 2001 Bruwer et al.
6181255 January 30, 2001 Crimmins et al.
6191701 February 20, 2001 Bruwer
6243000 June 5, 2001 Tsui
6249673 June 19, 2001 Tsui
6271765 August 7, 2001 King et al.
6282152 August 28, 2001 Kurple
6308083 October 23, 2001 King
6320514 November 20, 2001 Flick
6333698 December 25, 2001 Roddy
6344817 February 5, 2002 Verzulli
6359558 March 19, 2002 Tsui
6362771 March 26, 2002 Schofield et al.
6397058 May 28, 2002 Thibert et al.
6414587 July 2, 2002 Fitzgibbon
6441719 August 27, 2002 Tsui
6486795 November 26, 2002 Sobel et al.
RE37986 February 11, 2003 Heitschel et al.
6525645 February 25, 2003 King et al.
6542076 April 1, 2003 Joao
6556681 April 29, 2003 King
6556813 April 29, 2003 Tsui
6559775 May 6, 2003 King
6597291 July 22, 2003 Tsui
6634408 October 21, 2003 Mays
6661350 December 9, 2003 Rohrberg et al.
6690796 February 10, 2004 Farris et al.
6703941 March 9, 2004 Blaker
6759943 July 6, 2004 Lucy et al.
6791467 September 14, 2004 Ben-Ze'ev
6810123 October 26, 2004 Farris et al.
6822603 November 23, 2004 Crimmins et al.
6903650 June 7, 2005 Murray
6956460 October 18, 2005 Tsui
6963267 November 8, 2005 Murray
6975203 December 13, 2005 Brookbank et al.
20020034303 March 21, 2002 Farris et al.
20020067826 June 6, 2002 King
20020075133 June 20, 2002 Flick
20020126037 September 12, 2002 Fitzgibbon
20020137479 September 26, 2002 Tsui
20020140569 October 3, 2002 van Ee et al.
20020163440 November 7, 2002 Tsui
20020190872 December 19, 2002 Suman et al.
20020191794 December 19, 2002 Farris et al.
20020197955 December 26, 2002 Witkowski et al.
20030016119 January 23, 2003 Teich
20030016139 January 23, 2003 Teich
20030033540 February 13, 2003 Fitzgibbon
20030067394 April 10, 2003 Tsui
20030076235 April 24, 2003 Tsui
20030085798 May 8, 2003 Castro Esteban
20030118187 June 26, 2003 Fitzgibbon
20030189530 October 9, 2003 Tsui
20030197594 October 23, 2003 Olson et al.
20030197595 October 23, 2003 Olson et al.
20030216139 November 20, 2003 Olson et al.
20030228879 December 11, 2003 Witkowski et al.
20040048622 March 11, 2004 Witkowski et al.
20040061591 April 1, 2004 Teich
20040066936 April 8, 2004 Farris et al.
20040110472 June 10, 2004 Witkowski et al.
20040243813 December 2, 2004 Farris et al.
20050024184 February 3, 2005 Chuey
20050024185 February 3, 2005 Chuey
20050024229 February 3, 2005 Chuey
20050024230 February 3, 2005 Chuey
20050024254 February 3, 2005 Chuey
20050024255 February 3, 2005 Chuey
20050026601 February 3, 2005 Chuey
20050026602 February 3, 2005 Chuey et al.
20050026605 February 3, 2005 Guthrie et al.
Foreign Patent Documents
0 670 402 September 1995 EP
2 171 545 August 1986 GB
2 182 790 October 1986 GB
2 302 751 June 1996 GB
2 336 433 April 1999 GB
2335773 September 1999 GB
2 366 433 May 2000 GB
WO 94/02920 July 1993 WO
WO 00/29699 May 2000 WO
Other references
  • Combined Search and Examination Report Under Sections 17 and 18(3) mailed Nov. 2, 2004 for European patent application GB 0416789.6.
  • Combined Search and Examination Report Under Sections 17 and 18(3) mailed Nov. 2, 2004 for European patent application GB0416753.2.
  • Combined Search and Examination Report Under Sections 17 and 18(3) for European Application No. GB0416742.5 dated Oct. 26, 2004.
  • German Search/Examination Document, German Patent Application No. 103 14 228.2, Dec. 14, 2004.
  • Combined Search and Examination Report Under Sections 17 and 18(3) mailed Nov. 30, 2004 for the corresponding European patent application GB 0415908.3.
  • Search and Examination Report Under Sections 17 and 18(3), Sep. 25, 2003.
  • Garage Door/Gate Remote Control User's Instructions (Model 39), Skylink Technologies Inc., 2002.
  • HomeLink Wirless Control System Lighting Kit Installation, http://www.homelink.com/print/lightingprint.html.
  • HomeLink Wireless Control System Frequently Asked Questions, http://www.homelink.com/print/faqprint.html.
  • HomeLink Universal 2 Channel Receiver Model PR433-2, Installation Instructions, 114A2437, 2000.
  • Getting Starting with HomeLink, Programming Garage Door Openers and Gates.
  • HomeLink Universal Transceiver Lighting Package Programming.
  • Microchip HCS360 Keeloq Code Hopping Encoder, Microchip Technology Inc., DS40152E, 2002.
  • Microchip TB003, An Introduction to Keeloq Code Hopping, Microchip Technology Inc., DS91002A, 1996.
  • Chamberlain LiftMaster Professional Universal Receiver Model 635LM Owner's Manual, 114A2128C, The Chamberlain Group, Inc., 2002.
  • Flash2Pass eliminates past garage door opener hassles using a secure and easy-to-install system, Press Release, F2P Electronics, Inc., Jan. 2002.
  • Flash2Pass Easy Set Up Instructions, v031003, F2P Technologies.
  • The X-10 Powerhouse Power Line Interface Model #PL513 and Two-Way Power Line Interface Model #TW523, Technical Note, Dave Rye, Rev. 2.4, PL/TWTN/1291.
  • Neural Networks for ECCM, Simon Haykin, McMaster University Communications Research Laboratory Technical Report 282, Neurocomputing for Signal Processing, Feb. 1994, http://www.crl.mcmaster.ca/cgi-bin/markerabs.pl?282.
  • DRFM Theory of Operation, KOR Electronics, Inc., http://www.korelectronics.com/productsheets/theory-of-operations/drfm-theoryofop.htm.
  • Fabrication Process Combines Low Cost and High Reliability, Murat Eron, Richard J. Perko and R. James Gibson, Microwaves & RF, Oct. 1993.
  • Pager and Garage Door Opener Combination, Gail Marino, Motorola Technical Developments, vol. 10, Mar. 1990.
Patent History
Patent number: 7120430
Type: Grant
Filed: Jul 30, 2003
Date of Patent: Oct 10, 2006
Patent Publication Number: 20050026604
Assignee: Lear Corporation (Southfield, MI)
Inventors: Keith A. Christenson (Canton, MI), Saurabh S. Trivedi (Ann Arbor, MI), Jody K. Harwood (Canton, MI)
Primary Examiner: Erika A. Gary
Attorney: Brooks Kushman P.C.
Application Number: 10/630,168
Classifications
Current U.S. Class: Remote Programming Control (455/419); Programming Control (455/418)
International Classification: H04Q 7/20 (20060101); H04M 3/00 (20060101);