Coatings with tunable molecular architecture for drug-coated balloon

A drug delivery balloon is provided, the a balloon having an outer surface, and a tunable coating disposed on at least a length of the balloon surface. The tunable coating includes a first therapeutic agent and a first excipient, and can include a second therapeutic agent and a second excipient. The first and second therapeutic agents have different dissolution rates during balloon inflation and therefore provide a coating that is tunable.

Skip to: Description  ·  Claims  ·  References Cited  · Patent History  ·  Patent History
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The disclosed subject matter is related to the delivery of drugs from an insertable medical device. More particularly, the disclosed subject matter relates to a medical device including a balloon for delivery of a therapeutic agent, the balloon having a tunable, durable coating disposed on its outer surface.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Atherosclerosis is a syndrome affecting arterial blood vessels. A hallmark of atherosclerosis is a chronic inflammatory response in the walls of arteries, in large part due to the accumulation of lipid, cholesterol, leucocytes, and other inflammatory cells and the formation of plaque on the arterial wall. Atherosclerosis is commonly referred to as hardening of the arteries. Angioplasty is a vascular interventional technique involving mechanically widening an obstructed blood vessel, typically caused by atherosclerosis.

During angioplasty, a catheter having a tightly folded balloon is inserted into the vasculature of the patient and is passed to the narrowed location of the blood vessel at which point the balloon is inflated to a fixed size using an inflation fluid, typically angiographic contrast media. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), commonly known as coronary angioplasty, is a therapeutic procedure to treat the stenotic coronary arteries of the heart, often found in coronary heart disease.

In contrast, peripheral angioplasty, commonly known as percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA), refers to the use of mechanical widening of blood vessels other than the coronary arteries. PTA is most commonly used to treat narrowing of the leg arteries, especially, the iliac, external iliac, superficial femoral and popliteal arteries. PTA can also treat narrowing of veins, and other blood vessels.

Although the blood vessel is often successfully widened by angioplasty, sometimes the treated wall of the blood vessel experienced abrupt closure after balloon inflation or dilatation due to acute recoil or vasospasm. One solution to such collapse is stenting the blood vessel to prevent collapse. A stent is a device, typically a metal tube or scaffold, that is inserted into the blood vessel following angioplasty, in order to hold the blood vessel open.

While the advent of stents eliminated many of the complications of abrupt vessel closure after angioplasty procedures, within about six months of stenting, a re-narrowing of the blood vessel can form, a condition known as restenosis. Restenosis was discovered to be a response to the injury of the angioplasty procedure and is characterized by a growth of smooth muscle cells—analogous to a scar forming over an injury. As a solution, drug eluting stents were developed to address the reoccurrence of the narrowing of blood vessels. One example of a drug eluting stent is a metal stent that has been coated with a drug that is known to interfere with the process of restenosis. A potential drawback of certain drug eluting stents is known as late stent thrombosis, which is an event in which blood clots inside the stent.

Drug eluting balloons are believed to be a viable alternative to drug eluting stents in the treatment of atherosclerosis. In a study which evaluated restenosis and the rate of major adverse cardiac events such as heart attack, bypass, repeat stenosis, or death in patients treated with drug eluting balloons and drug eluting stents, the patients treated with drug eluting balloons experienced only 3.7 percent restenosis and 4.8% MACE (major adverse coronary events) as compared to patients treated with drug eluting stents, in which restenosis was 20.8 percent and 22.0 percent MACE rate. (See, PEPCAD II study, Rotenburg, Germany).

Although drug eluting balloons are a viable alternative, and in some cases appear to have greater efficacy than drug eluting stents as suggested by the PEPCAD II study, drug eluting balloons present challenges due to the very short period of contact between the drug coated balloon surface and the blood vessel wall. In particular, the balloon can only be inflated for less than one minute, and is often inflated for only thirty seconds. Therefore, an efficacious, therapeutic amount of drug must be transferred to the vessel wall within a thirty-second to one-minute time period. For the peripheral vasculature, the allowable inflation times can be greater than one minute, but are still measured in minutes. Thus, there are challenges specific to drug delivery via a drug coated balloon because of the necessity of a short inflation time, and therefore time for drug or coating transfer—a challenge not presented by a drug eluting stent, which remains in the patient's vasculature once implanted.

Other considerations are the current theories about the mechanism by which a drug coated balloon transfers drug to the vessel wall. One theory, for example, is that upon balloon expansion, drug mechanically fractures or dissolves from the coating, diffuses to the vessel wall and then permeates into the vessel wall. A second theory is that upon balloon expansion the balloon coating is transferred to the vessel wall, and then drug permeates into the vessel wall from the coating adhered to the vessel wall. Another theory is that the balloon expansion creates tears and microfissures in the vessel wall, and a portion of the coating inserts into the tears and microfissures. Drug then permeates into the vessel wall from the coating within the tears and fissures. Yet another theory is that upon balloon expansion, a layer of dissolved drug and coating excipients is formed at a high concentration on the vessel wall as a boundary layer. The drug diffuses and permeates from this boundary layer into the vessel wall. In most of these theories, the drug transfers from the balloon to the circulation or the vascular wall tissue upon fracture of the coating due to inflation of the balloon and occurs within one minute, and preferably within 30 seconds. Therefore, a need exists for a drug coated balloon having efficient drug transfer to a vessel wall.

Various embodiments of drug-coated balloons have been proposed, including balloons with a therapeutic agent disposed directly on the balloon surface and balloons having various protective sheaths. However, not all embodiments result in an efficacious response in reducing restenosis after balloon and bare metal stent trauma.

Therefore, a need exists for a drug eluting balloon and more particularly, a balloon coated with a therapeutic agent that provides for effective delivery kinetics of the therapeutic agent from the surface of the balloon.

SUMMARY OF INVENTION

The purpose and advantages of the disclosed subject matter will be set forth in and apparent from the description that follows, as well as will be learned by practice of the disclosed subject matter. Additional advantages of the disclosed subject matter will be realized and attained by the methods and systems particularly pointed out in the written description and claims hereof, as well as from the appended drawings.

In accordance with an aspect of the disclosed subject matter, a method is provided for coating a medical device including a body having an outer surface. For example, the medical device is a drug delivery balloon or a balloon catheter. The method includes selecting a cytostatic therapeutic agent, selecting at least one excipient, and blending the cytostatic agent and excipient to define a coating. In one embodiment, the cytostatic therapeutic agent and at least one excipient has a weight ratio of about 20:1 to about 1:20, and defines a coating, which provides increased efficiency of therapeutic transfer to a body lumen. In another embodiment, the cytostatic therapeutic agent and polymeric excipient define a coating in which at least one polymeric excipient has a polydispersity index from about 1.05 to about 10, and provides increased efficiency of therapeutic transfer to a body lumen.

The method can include adding or blending a plasticizer with the cytostatic therapeutic agent and the excipient. For example, but not limitation, the plasticizer includes glycerol. In one embodiment, the excipient to plasticizer weight ratio is from about 20:1 to about 1:20 and the cytostatic therapeutic agent and the at least one excipient have a weight ratio of about 20:1 to about 1:20.

In another embodiment, the medical device is a drug delivery balloon having a coating tuned to have a dissolution rate of about 10 seconds to about 1 h. For the therapeutic agent, delivery with balloon inflation occurs in less than 60 seconds and preferably less than 30 seconds.

In yet another aspect of the disclosed subject matter, a method is provided for tuning the solubility of a coating for application to a medical device. In one embodiment, the excipient is modified prior to blending the cytostatic therapeutic agent and excipient to achieve desired delivery kinetics. In one embodiment, the excipient is modified by positively charging the excipient. In another embodiment, the excipient includes a cyclic and aliphatic carbon chain and the excipient is modified by adjusting the ratio of cyclic chain to aliphatic chain. Advantageously, the adjusted chain ratio results in reduced elasticity and/or reduced release rate of the therapeutic agent. For example but not limitation, the excipient can be poly(vinylpyrrolidone), poly(ethylene glycol), or poly(ester amide) polymer.

The excipient can be modified by grafting a low molecular weight polyethylene glycol molecule to the excipient. In this regard, the modified excipient exhibits increased adhesion to a vessel wall. In another embodiment, the excipient is modified by increasing the crystallinity of the excipient. For example and not limitation, the excipient is poly(L-lactide-co-caprolactone) polyester, and the crystallinity of the excipient is modified by adjusting the content of L-lactide. In this regard, the content of L-lactide can be increased, thereby defining a coating having greater storage stability

The coatings of the disclosed subject matter can be applied to any surface of the medical device. In one embodiment, it is applied to the outer surface of the medical device. In accordance with one embodiment, the coating is applied to the surface of the medical device by direct fluid application. The method can further include applying heat to the coated medical device to dry the coating.

It is to be understood that both the foregoing description is exemplary and is intended to provide further explanation of the disclosed subject matter claimed to a person of ordinary skill in the art. The accompanying drawings are included to illustrate various embodiments of the disclosed subject matter to provide a further understanding of the disclosed subject matter. The exemplified embodiments of the disclosed subject matter are not intended to limit the scope of the claims.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

The disclosed subject matter will now be described in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which:

FIG. 1A depicts a representative planar view of a medical device of the disclosed subject matter, which is shown as a balloon catheter for illustration and not limitation.

FIG. 1B is a cross-sectional view taken along lines A-A in FIG. 1A in accordance with one embodiment of the disclosed subject matter.

FIG. 2 is a graph illustrating percent drug release as a function of drug, excipient and plasticizer ratio (D:E:P) in accordance with one embodiment of the disclosed subject matter.

FIG. 3 are optical micrographs (100× magnification) demonstrating the results of scratch tests of zotarolimus:PVP:glycerol coatings on glass slides at 10:1:0.4 (left panel) and 2:1:0.4 (right panel) in accordance with one embodiment of the disclosed subject matter.

FIG. 4 are optical micrographs (100× magnification) demonstrating the results of scratch tests of glass slide coatings of zotarolimus:PVP:Tween 20, 2:1:0.67 (left panel) and zotarolimus:PVP:Tween 80, 2:1:0.4 (right panel) in accordance with one embodiment of the disclosed subject matter.

FIG. 5 are optical micrographs (50× magnification) demonstrating the results of scratch tests of glass slide coatings of zotarolimus:PEG-PE, 2:1 (left panel) and zotarolimus:PEG-PE, 1:1 (right panel) in accordance with one embodiment of the disclosed subject matter.

FIG. 6 are optical micrographs demonstrating the results of scratch tests of glass slide coatings of zotarolimus:PEG-PE, 1:2 under brightfield (left panel, 50× magnification) or crossed polarizers (right panel, 200× magnification) in accordance with one embodiment of the disclosed subject matter.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Reference will now be made in detail to the various aspects of the disclosed subject matter. The method of the disclosed subject matter will be described in conjunction with the detailed description of the device, the figures and examples provided herein.

As disclosed herein, the devices and methods presented can be used for delivery within and/or treating of the lumen of a patient. In particular, the disclosed subject matter is particularly suited for treatment of the cardiovascular system of a patient, such as performance of angioplasty and delivery of a balloon expandable medical device, such as a stent, filter and coil.

As disclosed herein, a balloon catheter is provided for delivery of a therapeutic agent, the balloon including an outer surface having a tunable and durable coating disposed on at least a length of the outer surface. The tunable and durable coating includes a therapeutic agent and an excipient. The solubility of the coating in vivo, the biosolubility, of the coating is tunable based on the substances and concentrations chosen for the therapeutic agent and excipient.

Referring to FIG. 1, for purposes of illustration and not limitation, an exemplary embodiment of balloon catheter device in accordance with the disclosed subject matter is shown schematically in FIGS. 1A and 1B. As depicted in FIGS. 1A and 1B, the balloon catheter device 10 generally includes an elongated catheter shaft 12 having a proximal end and having a distal end and an expandable balloon 30 located proximate to the distal end of the catheter shaft. The expandable balloon has an outer surface and an inner surface disposed at the distal end portion of the catheter shaft. In accordance with the disclosed subject matter, a tunable coating 40 is applied to at least one length of the balloon catheter, the tunable coating including a first therapeutic agent and a first excipient, and can include a second therapeutic agent and a second excipient, wherein the first and second therapeutic agents have different dissolution rates during balloon inflation. In accordance with a preferred embodiment, as illustrated by way of example and not limitation in FIG. 1A, the coating is applied to at least one length of the outer surface of the balloon catheter.

The elongated catheter shaft 12 comprises an outer tubular member 14 and an inner tubular member 16. The outer tubular member 14 defines an inflation lumen 20 that can be disposed between the proximal end portion and the distal end portion of the catheter shaft 12. Specifically, as illustrated in FIG. 1B, the coaxial relationship between the inner tubular member 16 and the outer tubular member 14 defines an annular inflation lumen 20. The expandable member 30 is placed in fluid communication with the inflation lumen 20. The inflation lumen can supply fluid under pressure, and establish negative pressure to the expandable member. The expandable member 30 can thus be inflated and deflated. The elongated catheter is sized and configured for delivery through a tortuous anatomy, and can further include a guidewire lumen 22 that permits it to be delivered over a guidewire 18. As illustrated in FIG. 1B, the inner tubular member 16 defines the guidewire lumen 22 for the guidewire 18. Although FIGS. 1A and 1B illustrate the guidewire lumen as having an over-the-wire (OTW) construction, the guidewire lumen can be configured as a rapid-exchange (RX) construction, as is well known in the art.

As disclosed herein, the coating is tunable with respect to its solubility. Therefore, the drug delivery balloon is able to provide the desired delivery kinetics as a result of its tunability. The choice of excipient is key in determining efficacy factors such as, retaining of the therapeutic agent during delivery, releasing of the therapeutic agent during deployment, minimizing systemic dosing, maximizing agent delivery efficiency and therapeutic effect, and preventing particulate generation and related thromboses, among other factors.

As used in accordance with the disclosed subject matter, “tunable” refers to the ability to be tuned or adjusted for desired functioning. Accordingly, a tunable coating refers to a coating that can be adjusted according to various parameter discussed herein.

As disclosed herein, the balloon includes a tunable coating that comprises a therapeutic agent and an excipient. In accordance with one embodiment, the tunable coating includes a first therapeutic agent and a first excipient, and a second therapeutic agent and a second excipient. The coating has a biosolubility that is tunable based on the substances and concentrations chosen for each of the therapeutic agent and excipient. Preferably, the therapeutic agents have different dissolution rates. The coating can include additional therapeutic agents and excipients.

In accordance with the disclosed subject matter, the solubility of the coating can be adjusted by modifying a number of factors, including excipient type, composition and molecular weight of the excipient, modulation of excipient or polymer properties such as aqueous solubility, octanol/water partition coefficient, HLB (hydrophile-lipophile balance) number, glass transition temperature, degree of amorphous versus crystalline polymer, and orientation. Furthermore, the solubility or dissolution rates of the coating can be adjusted by varying the therapeutic agent concentration, therapeutic agent to excipient ratio, or coating thickness. Accordingly, these factors can be varied in order to provide a coating with the desired solubility and drug delivery kinetics.

The tunable coating provides for dissolution rates during balloon inflation that can be characterized generally as ranging from fast, soluble, intermediate, slow, extra slow, and non-soluble. Depending on the target tissue or vasculature where the therapeutic agent is to be delivered, the coating can be tuned such that the dissolution rate provides for effective drug delivery and uptake. A “fast” coating dissolution rate will typically have a dissolution time of less than 1 minute. A “soluble” coating dissolution rate will typically have a dissolution time ranging from about 1 minute to about 1 hour. An “intermediate” coating dissolution rate will typically have a dissolution time ranging from about 1 hour to about 2 weeks. A “slow” coating dissolution rate will typically have a dissolution time ranging from about 2 weeks to about 3 months. An “extra slow” coating dissolution rate will typically have a dissolution time ranging from about 3 months to 2 years. A “non-soluble” coating dissolution rate will typically have a dissolution time greater than 2 years. However, it shall be noted that the specific dissolution of a coating composition is dependent upon an interplay between input factors and that the dissolution rates provided herein are, therefore, recited as ranges.

The excipients include various oil-based, biosoluble, and durable or biodurable substances that are suitable for the delivery of a therapeutic agent. Biosolubility indicates solubility in a relevant biological media, such as blood. A substance which is not intended to degrade in the body, or which degrades only very slowly, is biodurable.

In accordance with a preferred embodiment, the excipients of the disclosed subject matter are water soluble. The excipients can include non-ionic hydrophilic polymers. Non-ionic hydrophilic polymers include, but are not limited to, poly(vinyl pyrrolidone) (PVP, povidone), silk-elastin like polymer, poly(vinyl alcohol), poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG), pluronics (PEO-PPO-PEO), poly(vinyl acetate), poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO), PVP-vinyl acetate (copovidone), polysorbate 80 (Tween 80), and polysorbate 20 (Tween 20). Preferably, the molecular weight of non-ionic hydrophilic polymers can be less than 50 kDa for fast solubility. The excipient can also include fatty acids. Further, the excipient can be a lubricious material which improves spreading and uniformity of coating.

In accordance with one embodiment, the excipient consists of a biocompatible plasticizer. Alternatively, the plasticizer can be added to the excipient to keep it soft and pliable. Plasticizers can allow for greater coating flexibility and elongation to prevent coating cracking during inflation or brittleness. Plasticizers include, but are not limited to, glycerol, ethanol, dimethylsulfoxide, ethyl lactate, benzyl alcohol, benzyl benzoate, Cremophor EL, Vitamin E, tocopherol, liquid PEG (MW<1000), triethyl citrate, tributyl citrate, acetyl tributyl citrate, acetyl triethyl citrate, dibutyl phthalate, dibutyl sebacate, dimethyl phthalate, triacetin, propylene glycol, glycerin, 2-pyrridone, and combinations thereof. Preferably, a biocompatible plasticizer is used.

In accordance with yet another embodiment, sugars, polysaccharides or cellulosics, can be used as binders for the particles. Polysaccharides include, but are not limited to, dextran, sulfonated dextran, hydrogenated dextran, chondroitin sulfate, sodium hyaluronate, hyaluronic acid, hyaluronan, chitosan, sodium alginate, sucrose, pectin, mannitol, carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) sodium, methyl cellulose, ethyl cellulose, hydroxyethyl cellulose, hydroxypropyl cellulose, and hydroxypropylmethylcellulose. Certain negative charged polysaccharides will provide a mucoadhesive effect to enhance tissue drug retention. Furthermore, sugars such as mannitol will provide a decreased hygroscopic effect when blended with more moisture-sensitive active ingredients such as cytostatic drugs or moisture sensitive excipients. Water soluble cellulosic materials can enhance coating strength or brittleness.

In accordance with yet another embodiment, anti-coagulants can be used as an excipient. For example, heparin based polysaccharides can provide a minimally thrombogenic surface to prevent blood clotting on the balloon surface or minimize platelet activation induced by the procedure. Heparin based polysaccharides include, but are not limited to, heparin, heparin sulfate, heparin disaccharides, heparin fraction 1, heparin fraction 2, low molecular weight heparin, heparin ammonium, heparin calcium, heparin lithium, heparin lithium, and heparin zinc lithium. Low molecular weight heparin includes centaxarin, periodate-oxidized heparin, heparin sodium end-amidated, heparin sodium, and nitrous acid delaminated.

In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the disclosed subject matter, the excipient possesses a mucoadhesive property. This mucoadhesive property of the binder will lead to longer drug retention within the coating adhered to the vessel wall. In particular, positively charged excipients such as chitosan, negatively charged excipients such as some polysaccharides (e.g. carboxymethylcellulose, sodium hyaluronate, sodium alginate) and some non-ionic hydrophilic polymers exhibit mucoadhesive properties. Any of the above carboxylated materials can also be lightly activated with esters such as nitrophenolate or NHS-esters (N-hydroxy succinimide) for increased mucoadhesiveness. Alternatively, any above materials can be lightly thiolated for increased mucoadhesiveness and continued solubility.

Additionally or alternatively, the excipient is or includes a contrast agent, including but not limited to, Iopromide (Ultravist), Ioxaglate (Hexabrix), Ioversol (Optiray), Iopamidol (Isovue), Diatrixoate (Conray), Iodixanol (Visipaque), Iohexol (Omnipaque), and Iotrolan. At an intermediate coating thickness, a lower molecular weight (<1 kDa) hydrophilic contrast agent such as Iopromide (Ultravist) would enable faster therapeutic release and a slightly higher viscous coating of the vessel wall as compared with drug alone. The contrast agents are lipophilic and can aid in drug uptake and retention into the tissue wall. In accordance with one embodiment, Ultravist and Optiray can be used given their more benign history of effects to smooth muscle and endothelial cells.

In accordance with yet another embodiment, excipients can consist of carboxylated aromatics similar in molecular structure to the structure used in contrast agents but without iodide substituents. These negatively charged carboxylated aromatic structures can be alkylated (C2-C12) to optimize drug tissue uptake, or halogenated with fluoride, chloride or bromide for the same reason. The negatively charged structures are beneficial for tissue adhesiveness.

Table 1 provides non-limiting examples of the solubility data for excipients that can be used in accordance with the disclosed subject matter:

TABLE 1 Solubility Enhancement of a Therapeutic Agent with Select Excipients Zotarolimus Solubility Solution (5% w/w) (μg/ml, n = 3) Phosphate buffered saline 0.53 PVP C-17 5.6 ± 1.6 Hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin 11.6 ± 3.1  PEG 400 31.5 ± 3.5  Glycerol 43.2 ± 30.1 5% γ-Cyclodextrin 55.3 ± 34.3 Vitamin E TPGS  512 ± 49.5 Tween 20  732 ± 94.7 18:0 PEG2000 PE (PEG-PE)* 1020 ± 417  *1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine-N-[methoxy(polyethyleneglycol)-2000] (ammonium salt)

As illustrated in Table 1, the excipients provide for increased solubility for the cytostatic drug, zotarolimus, as compared to saline alone. The excipients Vitamin E TPGS, Tween 20, and PEG-PE demonstrate the largest increase in zotarolimus solubility.

Table 2 provides non-limiting examples of coating dissolution rates during balloon inflation and representative excipient examples.

TABLE 2 Examples of Delivery Kinetics and Expected Variable Ranges for Balloon Coatings Coating Dissolution Rate (during Coating balloon Dissolution Representative Excipient inflation) Time Example Fast <1 minute Poly(vinylpyrrolidone) (PVP) (MW <60 kDa) or Poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) (lower MW <35 kDa) Soluble 1 min to 1 hour Poly(vinylpyrrolidone) (PVP) (MW >60 kDa) or Polyethylene oxide (PEO) (higher MW >100 kDa) Intermediate 1 hour to 2 weeks Silk-elastin like protein polymers Slow 2 weeks-3 months Biodegradable polymer such as Poly(D,L-lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) (50:50) Extra Slow 3 months-2 years Biodegradable polymer such as Poly(L-lactide-co-ε-caprolactone) (PLLA:PCL) (70:30) Non-Soluble >2 years Durable polymer such as Poly(vinylidene fluoride-co- hexafluoropropylene)

As illustrated in Table 2 above, for a “fast” coating dissolution rate, representative excipient examples include, without limitation, polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) with a molecular weight less than about 60 kDa, or polyethylene glycol (PEG) having a molecular weight less than about 35 kDa. The drug delivery mechanism and kinetics expected with this representative example include the release of the therapeutic agent with the coating during inflation. Further, the potential mucoadhesive polymer increases drug retention time on tissue or vasculature. Alternatively, or additionally, the lipophilic additive increases drug uptake in tissue.

As illustrated in Table 2 above, for a “soluble” coating dissolution rate, representative excipient examples include, without limitation, poly(vinylpyrrolidone) (PVP) having a molecular weight greater than about 60 kDa, or poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) having a molecular weight greater than about 100 kDa. The drug delivery mechanism and kinetics expected with this representative example are similar to that of the “fast” coating dissolution rate, however, the slightly slower dissolution time allows for less drug wash off during balloon delivery before inflation.

As illustrated in Table 2 above, for an “intermediate” coating dissolution rate, representative excipient examples include, without limitation, silk-elastin like protein polymers. The drug delivery mechanism and kinetics expected with this representative example provides for enhanced systemic drug loss protection and absence of short-term solubility, therefore allowing for enhanced particulate safety. For an “intermediate” dissolution rate, the therapeutic agent is not released together with the coating but from the coating. The therapeutic agent release kinetics and transfer to tissue are significantly enhanced by mechanical action during balloon inflation. Typically, these type of coating materials can by hydrophilic and can swell to some extent upon hydration to aid in fast drug release.

As illustrated in Table 2 above, for a “slow” coating dissolution rate, representative excipient examples include, without limitation, biodegradable polymers such as Poly(D,L-lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) (50:50). The coatings from biodegradable hydrophobic polymers will offer enhanced systemic drug loss protection and a better particulate safety profile. The therapeutic agent is not released together with the coating but from the coating. Drug release kinetics and transfer to tissue are significantly enhanced by mechanical action during balloon inflation. Techniques such as using a thin coating, a polymer with a low glass transition temperature (Tg), and amorphous material or low crystalline material can provide for a more rapid drug release profile when using a biodegradable polymer.

As illustrated in Table 2 above, for an “extra slow” coating dissolution rate, representative excipient examples include, without limitation, biodegradable polymers such as poly(L-lactide-co-ε-caprolactone) (PLLA:PCL) (70:30). The drug delivery mechanism and kinetics are similar to a “slow” coating dissolution rate, however the degradation time is significantly extended. These coatings will have more long term degradation and mechanical stability under storage.

As illustrated above, for a “non-soluble” coating dissolution rate, representative excipient examples include, without limitation, durable polymers such as poly(vinylidene fluoride-co-hexafluoropropylene). The drug delivery mechanism and kinetics are similar to both a “slow” and “extra slow” coating dissolution rate, however the material is non-biodegradable. These non-soluble coatings will have the most chemical and mechanical stability under storage than other types.

In accordance with one embodiment, the excipient is a durable or biodurable excipient. Certain representative examples of durable excipients are provided in Table 3.

TABLE 3 Examples of durable excipients Excipient Specific Description Hydroxypropylmethylcellulose phthalate Coating agent, can improve coating strength and be combined with plasticizer to reduce brittleness PVP/PEO + acrylates + photoinitiator + PVP UV curable coating would retain drug during crosslinker delivery and rapidly release drug after balloon expansion, lubricious Polyethylene vinyl acetate phthalate Coating agent, can improve coating strength and be combined with plasticizer to reduce brittleness Poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL); flexible material, low Tg and low crystallinity Poly (caprolactone) co-polymerized with material can provide for rapid drug release lactide and/or glycolide Poly(DL-lactide) Flexible material, soluble in various solvents for spray processing, can improve coating strength and be combined with plasticizer to reduce brittleness Poly(L-lactide-co-e-caprolactone)(PLCL) Flexible material, soluble in various solvents (50:50) for spray processing, can improve coating strength and be combined with plasticizer to reduce brittleness PCL-PEG (di and tri-block copolymers); Flexible material, can modulate PEG length for Poly(trimethylenecarbonate) copolymerized varying degrees of water absorption and with caprolactone, lactide, glycolide and/or release rates other comonomoers; Poly(lactide)-PEG(di- and tri-block copolymers)lactide copolymerized with caprolactone, glycolide and/or other comonomers Polyethylene vinyl acetate Flexible material; biocompatible PVDF and PVDF copolymers (e.g., Solef) Blood compatible, low thrombogenicity, flexible materials with good temperature stability, soluble in acetone for spray processing PEA based on leucine, alanine, phenylalanine, Polymer structure can be fine tuned to any other amino acid, or combinations thereof modulate drug miscibility and release profile, soluble in various solvents for spray processing Phosphorylcholine derivatized polymers Non-thrombogenic polymer structure that can including acrylates, methacrylates, PEA and be fine tuned to modulate drug miscibility and aliphatic polyesters release profile, soluble in various solvents for spray processing Silk-elastin like polymers Thermally crosslinked, biocompatible PEG-based thol-ene crosslinked gels Enhanced mucoadhesiveness, low thrombogenicity Polyacrylic acid (Carbomer) Mucoadhesive, swells but does not dissolve in aqueous media PBMA copolymers; Good adhesion HPMA; PHEMA-co-PAAm Hydrophilic polyurethane containing a PEO or Blood compatible, flexible material, can other hydrophilic soft segment modulate water absorption and drug release rate with soft segment MW and content

The durable excipients in accordance with the disclosed subject matter bind the therapeutic agent to the balloon or device surface and protect the agent during delivery to a treatment location. For example, after expansion of the balloon at the treatment site, the balloon will contact the vessel wall and the therapeutic agent will be rapidly released to cause the desired beneficial effect. During and after inflation, the biodurable excipient will remain on the balloon with no particulate loss. To release the drug at a sufficient rate from these polymers, it is necessary to have high drug concentrations above perculation, with drug to polymer ratios at about 1:1 or higher.

In accordance with one embodiment, a primer coating is necessary to allow for good and adequate adhesion such that, for example, a stent and coating can be removed in a safe manner.

In accordance with the disclosed subject matter, the outer surface of the balloon has a tunable coating that is disposed on at least a length of the outer surface. Preferably, the tunable coating includes a first therapeutic agent and a first excipient and a second therapeutic agent and a second excipient. In accordance with a preferred embodiment, the first and second therapeutic agents have different dissolution rates during balloon inflation. Thus, the desired coating dissolution rates can be tunable and achieved as desired for either drug kinetics or safety profile. The delivery of the therapeutic agents can be modified and optimized to meet the therapeutic need. Furthermore, depending on the excipients used, the therapeutic agents can be released from the excipient or coating or with the excipient or coating. In accordance with one embodiment, the first therapeutic agent is released from the coating, and the second therapeutic agent is released with the coating.

In one embodiment, the first therapeutic agent is different than the second therapeutic agent. Alternatively, however, the therapeutic agents can be the same.

In accordance with another embodiment, the coating can also include a third therapeutic agent and a third excipient. The therapeutic agents and excipients can be applied simultaneously to the balloon surface or they can be applied separately.

In accordance with yet another embodiment, the disclosed subject matter includes a balloon having a the tunable coating including a cytostatic drug and at least one excipient, wherein in the coating at least one polymeric component has a polydispersity index from about 1.05 to about 10, more preferably from 1.05 to 5. The polydispersity index (PDT), is a measure of the distribution of molecular mass in a given polymer sample. The PDI calculated is the weight average molecular weight divided by the number average molecular weight. It indicates the distribution of individual molecular masses in a batch of polymers. A smaller PDI value provides a more consistent dissolution rate among the polymeric excipient molecules.

It has been found that coatings can be tunable to achieve desirable dissolution and drug delivery kinetics. In this regard, the choice of an excipient or modified excipient can be important to define coatings exhibiting efficacy factors such as but not limited to: how the therapeutic agent is retained during delivery, how the agent is released during balloon inflation, minimizing systemic drug dosing, maximizing agent delivery efficiency and therapeutic effect, and preventing particulate loss, related thromboses and embolic events.

Accordingly, in one aspect of the disclosed subject matter, a method is provided for coating a medical device, such as a drug coated balloon. The coating includes a cytostatic therapeutic agent and an excipient having a tunable molecular architecture. As used herein the phrase “tunable molecular architecture” means selection of an appropriate excipient composition, molecular structure, functionality, and morphology including appropriate modifications to yield the desired coating dissolution and drug delivery kinetics. The molecular architecture can be tuned through the design of input variables such as monomer/polymer composition, aromaticity, hydrophilicity, molecular charge, neutrality, aliphatic chain length, density of functional groups, molecular weight, aqueous solubility, octanol/water partition coefficient, HLB number, glass transition temperature, and percent crystallinity. The method of the disclosed subject matter advantageously is capable of providing desired delivery kinetics as a result of its tunability.

In accordance with the disclosed subject matter, the method includes selecting a cytostatic therapeutic agent and an excipient, and blending or mixing the cytostatic agent and excipient to define a coating. The method can further include tuning the molecular structure of the coating such that specific characteristics of the coating that are important to product performance can be adjusted and optimized. Some of these characteristics include coating solubility, coating hydrophilicity, coating adhesion and cohesion, coating stability under sterilization and storage, drug release kinetics, drug solubility and stability, and safety profile including particulate hazard and re-endothelialization.

For example and not limitation, the molecular architecture of the excipient can be modified and tuned through the adjustment of several input parameters, as described in Table 4 below.

TABLE 4 Inputs that Affect Molecular Architecture and Excipient or Coating Characteristics Excipient Effect(s) of Effect(s) of Modification Increase Decrease Example Monomer/Polymer Choice of excipient or coating composition Poly(vinylpyrrolidone) Composition has a large effect on all coating characteristics. (PVP) or contrast agent for soluble coating agent. Thin poly(vinylidene fluoride-co- hexafluoropropylene) (PVDF-HFP) for durable coating. Monomer/Polymer A high interaction between More spacing between chains Increased L-lactide content Composition - polymer chains can provide can provide more amorphous in poly(L-lactide-co- Intramolecular for increased coating content and lower caprolactone) copolymers attraction: H mechanical stability, crystallinity for faster can lead to higher Bonding versus cohesion, higher solubility and decreased crystallinity. Polyurethane Steric Hindrance crystallinity and greater stability of material. ureas exhibit increased H- molecular packing density. bonding and mechanical stability. Hydrophilicity Will provide faster water Slower water absorption, Non-ionic hydrophilic absorption, faster drug release, slower drug release, and polymers such as PVP and and faster coating dissolution. slower coating dissolution. polyethylene glycol (PEG) are water soluble and provide for fast coating dissolution and drug delivery. Can increase or decrease PEG content as a soft segment in polyurethanes to increase or decrease hydrophilicity. Non-ionic hydrophobic polymers such as PVDF- HFP or PCL are non-water soluble. Molecular Charge Charged molecules tend to Lower charge or more neutral Charged polysaccharides or Neutrality possess mucoadhesive species can exhibit less such as carboxymethylcellulose, properties. mucoadhesive properties. sodium hyaluronate, chitosan, and sodium alginate can exhibit mucoadhesive properties as well as complex and/or physically bind negatively charged molecules. Cyclic Chain Cyclic chain will increase Lower chain rigidity (lower Adjusting the ratio of cyclic chain rigidity (higher Tg), faster release rate and to aliphatic chain in Tg), therefore slow down higher % elongation. poly(ester amide) (PEA) the release rate. The polymers. elasticity will also be reduced as a result. Aliphatic Chain Increased carbon chain Decreased carbon chain Adjusting length of Length length will lend towards lengths will lend towards hydrocarbon chains in increased flexibility increased stiffness (higher poly(ester amide) (PEA) (lower Tg) of material for Tg) of material for lower polymers. higher % elongation and % elongation and faster drug slower drug release. release. Density of Increase density of Lower density of functional RGD grafted low MW PEG Functional Groups grafted signaling or other groups and attached ligands can provide for increased molecules such as RGD can allow for decreased adhesion of released coating sequences for cell steric hindrance and to the vascular endothelial attachment. increased bioavailability. cell wall. Molecular Weight Higher molecular weight Lower molecular weight will Lower molecular weight material will tend towards tend towards lower spray (<60 kDa). higher spray viscosity and viscosity and increased poly(vinylpyrrolidone) is lower solubility in solubility in various spray easily spray coated due to various spray solvents and solvents and in aqueous its low spray viscosity and in aqueous media. In media. Lower Mw will also high solubility in aqueous general, a higher translate to faster release and organic media. molecular weight for rate. provide for increased mechanical strength and cohesion of a coating to a certain cut-off value. Higher MW will also translate to slower release rate. Glass Transition Increased EtO Decreased EtO Certain low Tg Poly(e- Temperature sterilization stability sterilization stability caprolactone) based and slower drug leading to coating flow and materials can provide a very release. Less flexible faster drug release. More fast burst release of drug up coating for decreased flexible coating for enhanced to 99%+ release at 1 day. handling and catheter catheter processing Adding a plasticizer such as processing performance. performance. glycerol to non-ionic hydrophilic polymers such as poly(vinylpyrrolidone) can lower the dry coating Tg to increase coating flexibility. % Crystallinity Higher storage stability, Lower storage stability, Increasing or decreasing L- slower drug release, less faster solubility, faster lactide) content in poly(L- flexible coating. drug release, more lactide-co-caprolactone) flexible coating. polyester copolymers. Adding HFP to PVDF copolymer to increase coating flexibility and drug release.

In accordance with the disclosed subject matter, the coating can be applied to the medical device by processes such as dip-coating, pipette coating, syringe coating, air assisted spraying, electrostatic spraying, piezoelectric spraying, spray drying, pneumatic spray, ultrasonic spray, spray with patterning, electrospinning, direct fluid application, or other means as known to those skilled in the art. The coating can be applied over at least a length or the entirety of the balloon or medical device. By way of example, and not limitation, certain coating processes that can be used with the instant disclosed subject matter are described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,669,980 to Hansen; U.S. Pat. No. 7,241,344 to Worsham; and U.S. Publication No. 20040234748 to Stenzel, the entire disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference. In accordance with one embodiment of the disclosed subject matter, the medical device is a balloon catheter and the coating can be applied to either a folded or inflated balloon. Furthermore, the coating can be directly applied into the folds of the folded balloons. The coating characteristics are affected by process variables. For example, for dip-coating process, coating quality and thickness can vary as an effect of variables such as number, rate, and depth of dips along with drying time and temperature.

In accordance with one embodiment, the balloon can be sprayed with therapeutic agent encapsulated in the durable excipient solution. Spray solvents can consist of the following class III solvents including but not limited to acetone, anisole, 1-butanol, 2-butanol, butyl acetate, tert-butylmethyl ether, cumene, dimethyl sulfoxide, ethanol, ethyl acetate, ethyl ether, ethyl formate, heptane, hexane, cyclohexane, isobutyl acetate, isopropyl acetate, methyl acetate, 3-methyl-1-butanol, methylethyl ketone, methylisobutyl ketone,cyclohexanone, 2-methyl-1-propanol, pentanel, 1-pentanol, 1-propanol, and propyl acetate, or blends thereof.

Additional spray solvents that can be used or blended with class III solvents include class II spray solvents. The class II spray solvents include but are not limited to, acetonitrile, chloroform, 1,2-dichloroethane, dichloromethane, 1,2-dimethyloxyethene, N,N-dimethylacetamide, N,N-dimethylformamide, 1,4-dioxane, 2-ethoxyethanol, ethylene glycol, formamide, hexane, methanol, 2-methoxyethanol, methyl butyl ketone, methylcyclohexane, N-methylpyrrolidone, nitromethane, pyridine, sulfolane, tetrahydrofuran, tetralin, toluene, 1,1,2-trichloroethene, and xylene.

In accordance with the disclosed subject matter, the excipient and therapeutic agent coating process can occur aseptically or be followed with terminal sterilization methods such as E-beam, gamma irradiation, or ethylene oxide sterilization.

In accordance with the disclosed subject matter, excipients are utilized together with the therapeutic agent in the coating at ratios ranging from 1:20 to 20:1 excipient:drug by weight, preferably from 1:10 to 10:1, more preferably from 1:2 to 2:1. Preferably, the coating includes a plasticizer. In this regards, the excipient to plasticizer weight ratio is from about 20:1 to about 1:20, more preferably from 10:1 to 1:1.

In accordance with another embodiment of the disclosed subject matter, the coating includes various layers. In one embodiment, the coating includes first and second layers adsorbed to the surface of the balloon. The first layer typically consists of one therapeutic agent and one excipient and the second layer typically consists of a second therapeutic agent and second excipient. The drug coated balloon is designed such that the first and second layers each have a dissolution rate. Preferably, the dissolution profile of the first layer is different than the dissolution profile of the second layer. Providing layers with various dissolution profiles allows the coating to be tuned to an optimized range.

In accordance with yet another embodiment, the disclosed subject matter includes a method of increasing the efficiency of therapeutic transfer to a body lumen by implanting or inserting a medical device in a body lumen. The medical device includes an expandable member having an outer surface and a coating disposed on the outer surface of the medical device, the coating including a therapeutic agent and an excipient.

For example and not limitation, the therapeutic agent or drug can include anti-proliferative, anti-inflammatory, antineoplastic, antiplatelet, anti-coagulant, anti-fibrin, antithrombotic, antimitotic, antibiotic, antiallergic and antioxidant compounds. Thus, the therapeutic agent can be, again without limitation, a synthetic inorganic or organic compound, a protein, a peptide, a polysaccharides and other sugars, a lipid, DNA and RNA nucleic acid sequences, an antisense oligonucleotide, an antibody, a receptor ligands, an enzyme, an adhesion peptide, a blood clot agent including streptokinase and tissue plasminogen activator, an antigen, a hormone, a growth factor, a ribozyme, and a retroviral vector. Preferably, however, the therapeutic agents include a cytostatic drug. The term “cytostatic” as used herein means a drug that mitigates cell proliferation, allows cell migration, and does not induce cell toxicity. These cytostatic drugs, include for the purpose of illustration and without limitation, macrolide antibiotics, rapamycin, everolimus, zotarolimus, biolimus, novolimus, myolimus, temsirolimus, deforolimus, structural derivatives and functional analogues of rapamycin, structural derivatives and functional analogues of everolimus, structural derivatives and functional analogues of zotarolimus and any macrolide immunosuppressive drugs. The term “antiproliferative” as used herein means a drug used to inhibit cell growth, such as chemotherapeutic drugs. Some non-limiting examples of antiproliferative drugs include taxanes, paclitaxel, and protaxel.

Therefore, in accordance with a preferred embodiment, a balloon for delivery of a cytostatic drug is provided. The outer surface of the balloon includes a tunable coating, the tunable coating including a first cytostatic drug and a first excipient and a second cytostatic drug and a second excipient. The first and second cytostatic drugs preferably have different dissolution rates during balloon inflation. The various dissolution rates allow for more effective and efficient delivery of the therapeutic agent.

With reference to the balloon construction, a polymeric expandable balloon material is preferred. For example, the polymeric material utilized to form the balloon body can be compliant, non-compliant or semi-compliant polymeric material or polymeric blends.

In one embodiment, the polymeric material is compliant such as but not limited to a polyamide/polyether block copolymer (commonly referred to as PEBA or polyether-block-amide). Preferably, the polyamide and polyether segments of the block copolymers can be linked through amide or ester linkages. The polyamide block can be selected from various aliphatic or aromatic polyamides known in the art. Preferably, the polyamide is aliphatic. Some non-limiting examples include nylon 12, nylon 11, nylon 9, nylon 6, nylon 6/12, nylon 6/11, nylon 6/9, and nylon 6/6. Preferably, the polyamide is nylon 12. The polyether block can be selected from various polyethers known in the art. Some non-limiting examples of polyether segments include poly(tetramethylene ether), tetramethylene ether, polyethylene glycol, polypropylene glycol, poly(pentamethylene ether) and poly(hexamethylene ether). Commercially available PEBA material can also be utilized such as for example, PEBAX® materials supplied by Arkema (France). Various techniques for forming a balloon from polyamide/polyether block copolymer is known in the art. One such example is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,406,457 to Wang, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference.

In another embodiment, the balloon material is formed from polyamides. Preferably, the polyamide has substantial tensile strength, be resistant to pin-holing even after folding and unfolding, and be generally scratch resistant, such as those disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,500,148 to Pinchuk, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference. Some non-limiting examples of polyamide materials suitable for the balloon include nylon 12, nylon 11, nylon 9, nylon 69 and nylon 66. Preferably, the polyamide is nylon 12. Other suitable materials for constructing non-compliant balloons are polyesters such as poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET), Hytrel thermoplastic polyester, and polyethylene.

In another embodiment, the balloon is formed of a polyurethane material, such as TECOTHANE® (Thermedics). TECOTHANE® is a thermoplastic, aromatic, polyether polyurethane synthesized from methylene disocyanate (MDI), polytetramethylene ether glycol (PTMEG) and 1,4 butanediol chain extender. TECOTHANE® grade 1065D is presently preferred, and has a Shore durometer of 65D, an elongation at break of about 300%, and a high tensile strength at yield of about 10,000 psi. However, other suitable grades can be used, including TECOTHANE® 1075D, having a Shore D hardness of 75. Other suitable compliant polymeric materials include ENGAGE® (DuPont Dow Elastomers (an ethylene alpha-olefin polymer) and EXACT® (Exxon Chemical), both of which are thermoplastic polymers. Other suitable compliant materials include, but are not limited to, elastomeric silicones, latexes, and urethanes.

The compliant material can be cross linked or uncrosslinked, depending upon the balloon material and characteristics required for a particular application. The presently preferred polyurethane balloon materials are not crosslinked. However, other suitable materials, such as the polyolefinic polymers ENGAGE® and EXACT®, are preferably crosslinked. By crosslinking the balloon compliant material, the final inflated balloon size can be controlled. Conventional crosslinking techniques can be used including thermal treatment and E-beam exposure. After crosslinking, initial pressurization, expansion, and preshrinking, the balloon will thereafter expand in a controlled manner to a reproducible diameter in response to a given inflation pressure, and thereby avoid overexpanding the stent (if used in a stent delivery system) to an undesirably large diameter.

In one embodiment, the balloon is formed from a low tensile set polymer such as a silicone-polyurethane copolymer. Preferably, the silicone-polyurethane is an ether urethane and more specifically an aliphatic ether urethane such as PURSIL AL 575A and PURSIL AL10, (Polymer Technology Group), and ELAST-EON 3-70A, (Elastomedics), which are silicone polyether urethane copolymers, and more specifically, aliphatic ether urethane cosiloxanes. In an alternative embodiment, the low tensile set polymer is a diene polymer. A variety of suitable diene polymers can be used such as, but not limited to, an isoprene such as an AB and ABA poly(styrene-block-isoprene), a neoprene, an AB and ABA poly(styrene-block-butadiene) such as styrene butadiene styrene (SBS) and styrene butadiene rubber (SBR), and 1,4-polybutadiene. Preferably, the diene polymer is an isoprene including isoprene copolymers and isoprene block copolymers such as poly(styrene-block-isoprene). A presently preferred isoprene is a styrene-isoprene-styrene block copolymer, such as Kraton 1161K available from Kraton, Inc. However, a variety of suitable isoprenes can be used including HT 200 available from Apex Medical, Kraton R 310 available from Kraton, and isoprene (i.e., 2-methyl-1,3-butadiene) available from Dupont Elastomers. Neoprene grades useful in the disclosed subject matter include HT 501 available from Apex Medical, and neoprene (i.e., polychloroprene) available from Dupont Elastomers, including Neoprene G, W, T and A types available from Dupont Elastomers.

In accordance with another aspect of the disclosed subject matter, the outer surface of the balloon is modified. In this regard, the balloon surface can include a textured surface, roughened surface, voids, spines, channels, dimples, pores, or microcapsules or a combination thereof, as will be described below.

In accordance with the disclosed subject matter, the balloon does not include a stent or is free of a stent. However, a stent can be mounted onto the coated balloon. The stent will not detrimentally affect coating integrity or drug delivery. The type of stent that can be used includes, but is not limited to, bare metal stent, balloon expandable stent, self expanding stent, drug eluting stent, prohealing stent, and self-expanding vulnerable plaque implant. The balloon can be coated independently of the stent or in conjunction with the stent coating process. The stent coating can contain the same or different therapeutic agents from the balloon catheter or expandable member. However, the particular coating on the balloon catheter or expandable member preferably has distinct release kinetics from the therapeutic coating on the stent.

In one embodiment of the disclosed subject matter, the balloon is formed of a porous elastomeric material having at least one void formed in the wall of the balloon surface. For example, the entire cross section of the balloon can contain a plurality of voids. Alternatively, the plurality of void can be distributed along select lengths of the balloon outer surface. For example and not limitation, the plurality of voids can be distributed only along only the working section of the balloon. The voids define an open space within the outer surface of the balloon. Preferably, the therapeutic agent is dispersed within the space defined by the plurality of voids across the cross section of the balloon outer surface.

In operation, the therapeutic agent is released or is expelled from the pores upon inflation of the balloon. In this regard, the durometer of the polymeric material of the balloon surface and in particular the depression of the void is sufficiently flexible to allow for expulsion of the therapeutic agent and/or coating contained within the plurality of voids upon inflation of the balloon. The expelled coating with therapeutic agent is released into the vessel lumen or into the tissue surrounding and contacting the inflated balloon.

In another embodiment, the balloon includes protrusions configured to contact or penetrate the arterial wall of a vessel upon inflation of the balloon. A coating containing therapeutic agent is disposed on the protrusions and when inflated the coating and/or therapeutic agent coats the tissue of the arterial wall. Alternatively, the balloon can include two concentric balloons in a nesting configuration. The coating with therapeutic agent is disposed between the two concentric balloons. Thus, the space between the two concentric balloons; one being an interior balloon and the other being an exterior balloon, acts as a reservoir. In this regard, the protrusions can include apertures for expulsion of the coating and/or therapeutic agent upon inflation of the interior and exterior concentric balloons. For example, as described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,991,617 to Hektner, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference thereto. In another embodiment, the balloon can include longitudinal protrusions configured to form ridges on the balloon surface. As described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,273,417 to Wang, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference, the ridges can be formed of filaments spaced equidistantly apart around the circumference of the balloon. However, a larger or smaller number of ridges can alternatively be used. The longitudinal ridges can be fully or partially enveloped by the polymeric material of the balloon.

In yet another embodiment of the disclosed subject matter, the balloon can include microcapsules on its outer surface. In this regard, the microcapsules are configured to encompass the coating and/or therapeutic agent. Upon inflation of the balloon the microcapsules located on the surface of the balloon contact the tissue of the arterial wall. Alternatively, the microcapsules can be formed in the wall of the balloon surface. The coating and/or therapeutic agent can be released from the microcapsules by fracturing of the microcapsules and/or diffusion from the microcapsule into the arterial wall. The microcapsules can be fabricated in accordance with the methods disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,1023,402 to Dror or U.S. Pat. No. 6,129,705 to Grantz and the patents referenced therein, each of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

In accordance with another aspect of the disclosed subject matter, if desired, a protective sheath can be utilized to protect the coating from being rubbed off of the balloon during the movement of the coated balloon through the body lumen. The sheath is preferably made from an elastic and resilient material which conforms to the shape of the balloon and in particular is capable of expanding upon inflation of the balloon. The sheath preferably includes apertures along a length thereof. In operation, the inflation of the balloon causes the apertures of the sheath to widen for release of the coating and/or therapeutic agent to the tissue of the arterial wall. Preferably, the sheath has a thickness less than 10 mils. However, other thicknesses are possible.

In another embodiment, the sheath has at least one longitudinal line of weakness allowing the sheath to rupture upon inflation of the balloon and the release of the coating and/or therapeutic agent onto the tissue of the arterial wall of the vessel. Preferably, the sheath is formed from polymeric material known to be suitable for use in balloon catheters. Preferably, the sheath material is an elastomeric material which will also spring back when it splits to expose more of the body lumen to the coating. The line of weakness could be provided by various techniques known in the art. However, one non-limiting examples include perforating the sheath material. In operation, the sheath is placed over the coated balloon while in the deflated state. When the coated balloon is inflated, the sheath is expanded to the extent that it exceeds its elastic limit at the line of weakness and bursts to expose and therefore release the coating and/or therapeutic agent to the tissue of the arterial wall or vessel lumen. For example, see U.S. Pat. No. 5,370,614 to Amundson, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated by reference.

In accordance with another embodiment, an outer fibrous coating can be electrospun or stretched onto the medical device or balloon catheter to prevent drug loss during delivery. During balloon inflation, the coating is stretched and allows for coating dissolution and release. The fiber diameters and material properties can be fine tuned for optimal pore size and to release the particles containing the therapeutic agent. Fibrous coatings on expandable members are described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/237,998 to R. von Oepen and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/238,026 to K. Ehrenreich, the disclosures of which are incorporated by reference in their entirety.

It is to be noted that the term “a” entity or “an” entity refers to one or more of that entity. For example, a protein refers to one or more proteins or at least one protein. As such, the terms “a”, “an”, “one or more”, and “at least one” can be used interchangeably herein. The terms “comprising,” “including,” and “having” can also be used interchangeably. In addition, the terms “amount” and “level” are also interchangeable and can be used to describe a concentration or a specific quantity. Furthermore, the term “selected from the group consisting of” refers to one or more members of the group in the list that follows, including mixtures (i.e. combinations) of two or more members.

The term “about” or “approximately” means within an acceptable error range for the particular value as determined by one of ordinary skill in the art, which will depend in part on how the value is measured or determined, i.e., the limitations of the measurement system. For example, “about” can mean within 3 or more than 3 standard deviations, per the practice in the art. Alternatively, “about” can mean a range of up to +/−20%, preferably up to +/−10%, more preferably up to +/−5%, and more preferably still up to +/−1% of a given value. Alternatively, particularly with respect to biological systems or processes, the term can mean within an order of magnitude, preferably within 5-fold, and more preferably within 2-fold, of a value. With reference to pharmaceutical compositions, the term “about” refers to a range that is acceptable for quality control standards of a product approved by regulatory authorities.

EXAMPLES

The present application is further described by means of the examples, presented below. The use of such examples is illustrative only and in no way limits the scope and meaning of the disclosed subject matter or of any exemplified term.

Example A

To simulate drug release from a drug coated balloon, a three step in-vitro release method was developed. This method consists of a sequential dip release in 37° C. porcine serum for 1 min, inflation release in 37° C. porcine serum for 1 min and extraction release in 50% acetonitrile solution designed to mimic the balloon release during delivery to the lesion, drug delivery on inflation and the remaining drug on the balloon respectively. The resulting zotarolimus concentrations in the porcine serum supernatant are measured by liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LCMS) and drug from the extraction measured by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC).

This in-vitro release method was used to evaluate the drug release from zotarolimus (Zot):poly(vinylpyrrolidone) (PVP):glycerol drug coated balloons as a function of drug:excipient:plasticizer ratio (D:E:P) and PVP K-value. For the combined dip release and inflation release that simulates coating dissolution rate and drug delivery from a drug coated balloon, it is shown in FIG. 2 that a higher drug to excipient ratio such as D:E:P, 20:1:0.4 (w/w) resulted in a “soluble” coating dissolution rate with a dissolution time in the range of 1 min to 1 h releasing less than 5% of drug in 2 min. For lower D:E:P ratios and increasing amounts of plasticizer, the Zot:PVP:glycerol formulation demonstrated a “fast” dissolution rate, i.e. less than 1 min releasing up to 90% of drug in 2 min. For a lower molecular weight or PVP K-value such as PVP C-15, the coating dissolution rate and drug release during the dip release was further increased to 30% as compared to the PVP C-30 coating at the same 1:1:0.4, D:E:P ratio which demonstrated less than 5% dip release. The K-Values of C-15 and C-30 designate PVP K value for low endotoxin grade.

Example B

Scratch tests of coatings on glass slides were used to qualitatively evaluate coating mechanical properties in terms of hardness and tackiness. FIGS. 3 through 6 are optical micrographs of drug delivery balloon coating formulations coated onto glass slides. To produce the optical micrographs, the coating formulations were pipetted onto glass slides, and then the slides were baked at 50° C. for one hour. While observing under an optical microscope, the coatings were scratched with a steel mandrel to assess their hardness, brittleness, and resistance to fracture in the dry state. Stickiness was assessed by placing another clean glass slide onto the coatings, pressing them together and noting the force, if any, required to pull them apart.

It was observed that increasing the drug to excipient ratio for zotarolimus:PVP:glycerol to 10:1:0.4 (FIG. 3 left panel) from 2:1:0.4 (FIG. 3 right panel) resulted in increased hardness and reduced tackiness. Representative optical micrographs of these coatings after scratching are shown in FIG. 3. Coating with the 10:1:0.4 ratio (left panel) is much harder than the 2:1; 0.4 ratio (right panel), which was waxy.

Example C

The qualitative mechanical properties of zotarolimus:PVP:tween 20 coatings were evaluated by scratch tests of coatings deposited on glass slides. It was shown with representative optical micrographs in FIG. 4 (left panel) that zotarolimus:PVP:tween 20 at a ratio of 2:1:0.67 exhibited a soft and waxy coating. With zotarolimus:PVP:tween 80 at a ratio of 2:1:0.4 as shown in FIG. 4 (right panel) a slightly brittle, weak and chunky coating resulted.

Example D

The qualitative mechanical properties of zotarolimus:PEG-PE coatings were evaluated by scratch tests of coatings deposited on glass slides. It was shown with representative optical micrographs in FIG. 5 (left panel) that zotarolimus:PEG-PE, 2:1 exhibited a soft and waxy coating. With zotarolimus:PEG-PE, 1:1 as shown in FIG. 5 (right panel) a soft, waxy and tacky coating resulted. This coating underwent visible flow after scratching. Zotarolimus:PEG-PE, 1:2 as shown in FIG. 6 (left panel) exhibited a hard and waxy coating and was birefringence when observed under polarized light (right panel). This drug:excipient system exhibited eutectic behavior with the 1:1 ratio coating being the softest and compositions greater in either component being harder. Furthermore, at the lower drug:excipient ratio of 1:2 the birefringence indicates crystallization of the PEG-PE component.

The disclosed subject matter can be embodied in other specific forms without departing from its spirit or essential characteristics. The described embodiments are to be considered in all respects only as illustrative and not restrictive. Thus, it is intended that the disclosed subject matter include modifications and variations that are within the scope of the appended claims and their equivalents. All references recited herein are incorporated herein in their entirety by specific reference.

Claims

1. A method of coating an outer surface of a balloon of a balloon catheter, the method comprising:

selecting a first therapeutic agent;
selecting a first excipient;
modifying the first excipient, wherein modifying the first excipient comprises modification to two or more properties of the first excipient selected from the group consisting of polymer chain spacing, hydrophilicity, molecular charge, cyclic chain density, aliphatic chain length, functional group density, molecular weight, glass transition temperature, and crystallinity percentage;
selecting a second therapeutic agent;
selecting a second excipient;
modifying the second excipient, wherein modifying the second excipient comprises modification to at least one property of the excipient selected from the group consisting of polymer chain spacing, hydrophilicity, molecular charge, cyclic chain density, aliphatic chain length, functional group density, molecular weight, glass transition temperature, and crystallinity percentage;
blending the first therapeutic agent and the first excipient and the second therapeutic agent and the second excipient to define a coating; and
applying the coating to the outer surface of the balloon, wherein the first therapeutic agent and the first excipient have a weight ratio of about 20:1 to about 1:20, and further wherein the coating enables transfer of a therapeutically effective amount of the therapeutic agent to a body lumen within less than one hour.

2. The method of claim 1, further including:

blending a plasticizer with the first therapeutic agent and the first excipient.

3. The method of claim 2, wherein the first excipient to plasticizer weight ratio is from about 20:1 to about 1:20.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein the first therapeutic agent and the first excipient have a weight ratio of about 2:1 to about 1:2.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein the first therapeutic agent is cytostatic.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein the first excipient is poly(vinylpyrrolidone).

7. The method of claim 2, wherein the plasticizer is glycerol.

8. The method of claim 1, wherein the coating is applied to the outer surface of the balloon by direct fluid application.

9. The method of claim 1, further including applying heat to the coated medical device to dry the coating on the balloon.

10. The method of claim 1, wherein the first excipient is a polymer having a polydispersity index from about 1.05 to about 10.

11. The method of claim 10, further including:

blending a plasticizer with the first therapeutic agent and first excipient.

12. The method of claim 10, wherein the first therapeutic agent is zotarolimus.

13. The method of claim 10, wherein the first excipient is poly(vinylpyrrolidone).

14. The method of claim 11, wherein the plasticizer is glycerol.

15. The method of claim 1, wherein the coating has a dissolution time of about 10 seconds to about 1 hour.

16. The method of claim 1, further including:

blending a plasticizer with the first therapeutic agent and first excipient.

17. The method of claim 1, wherein the first therapeutic agent is the same as the second therapeutic agent.

18. The method of claim 15, wherein the first excipient is poly(vinylpyrrolidone).

19. The method of claim 16, wherein the plasticizer is glycerol.

20. The method of claim 15, wherein the therapeutically effective amount is transferred in less than 5 minutes.

21. The method of claim 15, wherein the therapeutically effective amount is transferred in 30 seconds or less.

22. A method of tuning the solubility of a coating for a medical device balloon of a balloon catheter, the method comprising:

selecting a first therapeutic agent;
selecting a first excipient;
modifying the first excipient, wherein modifying the first excipient comprises modification to two or more properties of the excipient selected from the group consisting of polymer chain spacing, hydrophilicity, molecular charge, cyclic chain density, aliphatic chain length, functional group density, molecular weight, glass transition temperature, and crystallinity percentage;
blending the first agent and the first excipient to define a first coating, the first coating having a first dissolution rate;
selecting a second therapeutic agent;
selecting a second excipient;
modifying the second excipient, wherein modifying the second excipient comprises modification to at least one property of the excipient selected from the group consisting of polymer chain spacing, hydrophilicity, molecular charge, cyclic chain density, aliphatic chain length, functional group density, molecular weight, glass transition temperature, and crystallinity percentage;
blending the second therapeutic agent and second excipient to define a second coating, the second coating having a second dissolution rate; wherein the first and second dissolution rates are different; and
applying the first and second coatings to at least one length of an outer surface of the balloon, the different dissolution rates defining a tunable solubility.

23. The method of claim 22, wherein the first excipient is a polymer having a molecular weight of less than about 35 kDalton.

24. The method of claim 22, wherein the second excipient is a polymer having a molecular weight greater than about 100 kDalton.

25. The method of claim 22, wherein the first excipient is poly(vinylpyrrolidone) or poly(ethylene glycol).

26. The method of claim 22, wherein the second excipient is poly(vinylpyrrolidone) or poly(ethylene glycol).

27. The method of claim 1, wherein modifying the first excipient occurs prior to blending the first therapeutic agent and the first excipient and the second therapeutic agent and the second excipient to define the coating.

28. The method of claim 1, wherein the first excipient is positively charged.

29. The method of claim 1, wherein the first excipient is negatively charged.

30. The method of claim 1, wherein the first excipient includes cyclic and aliphatic carbon chains, and further wherein modifying the first excipient includes adjusting cyclic chain to aliphatic chain ratio.

31. The method of claim 30, wherein the adjusted ratio results in reduced coating elasticity.

32. The method of claim 30, wherein the adjusted ratio results in reduced release rate of the first therapeutic agent from the coating.

33. The method of claim 1, wherein the first excipient is poly(ester amide) polymer.

34. The method of claim 1, wherein modifying the first excipient includes grafting a low molecular weight polyethylene glycol molecule to the first excipient, and further wherein the modified first excipient exhibits increased adhesion to a vessel wall.

35. The method of claim 1, wherein the modified first excipient has increased crystallinity.

36. The method of claim 35, wherein the first excipient is poly(L-lactide-co-caprolactone) polyester, and the crystallinity of the first excipient is modified by adjusting the content of L-lactide.

37. The method of claim 36, wherein the content of L-lactide is increased and the first excipient exhibits greater storage stability.

38. The method of claim 22, wherein the first excipient is polyvinylpyrrolidone.

39. The method of claim 22, wherein the second excipient is polyethylene glycol.

40. The method of claim 1, wherein the coating has a fast dissolution time after balloon inflation of one minute or less.

41. The method of claim 1, wherein the coating has a soluble dissolution time after balloon inflation of one minute to one hour.

Referenced Cited
U.S. Patent Documents
3929992 December 1975 Sehgal
3993749 November 23, 1976 Sehgal
4316885 February 23, 1982 Rakhil
4401653 August 30, 1983 Eng
4580568 April 8, 1986 Gianturco
4650803 March 17, 1987 Stella
4733665 March 29, 1988 Palmaz
4885171 December 5, 1989 Surendra
4897268 January 30, 1990 Tice et al.
4916193 April 10, 1990 Tang
4994071 February 19, 1991 MacGregor
5023262 June 11, 1991 Caufield
5092877 March 3, 1992 Pinchuk
5102402 April 7, 1992 Dror
5108416 April 28, 1992 Ryan et al.
5120725 June 9, 1992 Kao
5120727 June 9, 1992 Kao
5120842 June 9, 1992 Failli
5163952 November 17, 1992 Froix
5177203 January 5, 1993 Failli
5304121 April 19, 1994 Sahatjlan
5355832 October 18, 1994 Loh et al.
5370614 December 6, 1994 Amundson
5447724 September 5, 1995 Helmus
5457111 October 10, 1995 Luly
5464650 November 7, 1995 Berg
5516781 May 14, 1996 Morris
5527337 June 18, 1996 Stack
5563146 October 8, 1996 Morris
5591195 January 7, 1997 Taheri et al.
5591227 January 7, 1997 Dinh et al.
5605696 February 25, 1997 Eury
5624411 April 29, 1997 Tuch
5646160 July 8, 1997 Morris
5649977 July 22, 1997 Campbell
5665728 September 9, 1997 Morris
5669924 September 23, 1997 Shaknovich
5705583 January 6, 1998 Bowers
5720735 February 24, 1998 Dorros
5755771 May 26, 1998 Penn et al.
5767144 June 16, 1998 Win
5843089 December 1, 1998 Sahatjian et al.
5843172 December 1, 1998 Yan
5893840 April 13, 1999 Hull et al.
6015815 January 18, 2000 Mollison
6017324 January 25, 2000 Tu et al.
6033434 March 7, 2000 Borghi
6083257 July 4, 2000 Taylor
6090901 July 18, 2000 Bowers
6106548 August 22, 2000 Roubin
6106889 August 22, 2000 Beavers et al.
6129705 October 10, 2000 Grantz
6146358 November 14, 2000 Rowe
6235786 May 22, 2001 Dai
6273913 August 14, 2001 Wright
6284305 September 4, 2001 Ding
6299604 October 9, 2001 Ragheb et al.
6306144 October 23, 2001 Sydney et al.
6306166 October 23, 2001 Barry et al.
6329386 December 11, 2001 Mollison
6335029 January 1, 2002 Kamath et al.
6358556 March 19, 2002 Ding
6364856 April 2, 2002 Ding et al.
6368658 April 9, 2002 Schwarz et al.
6406457 June 18, 2002 Wang
6413272 July 2, 2002 Igaki
6419692 July 16, 2002 Yang
6500148 December 31, 2002 Pinchuk
6521658 February 18, 2003 Li
6585764 July 1, 2003 Wright
6616650 September 9, 2003 Rowe
6669980 December 30, 2003 Hansen
6682553 January 27, 2004 Webler, Jr.
6682556 January 27, 2004 Ischinger
6709440 March 23, 2004 Matin et al.
6726923 April 27, 2004 Iyer et al.
6991617 January 31, 2006 Hektner
7048714 May 23, 2006 Richter
7087263 August 8, 2006 Hossainy et al.
7241344 July 10, 2007 Worsham
7273417 September 25, 2007 Lundquist
7357942 April 15, 2008 Burke et al.
7378105 May 27, 2008 Burke et al.
7396539 July 8, 2008 Hossainy et al.
7399480 July 15, 2008 Mollison et al.
7445792 November 4, 2008 Toner et al.
7455853 November 25, 2008 Mollison et al.
7572245 August 11, 2009 Herweck et al.
8394398 March 12, 2013 Toner et al.
20020123505 September 5, 2002 Mollison et al.
20020183581 December 5, 2002 Yoe et al.
20020193828 December 19, 2002 Griffin et al.
20030129215 July 10, 2003 Mollison
20030170287 September 11, 2003 Prescott
20030204238 October 30, 2003 Tedeschi
20030216699 November 20, 2003 Falotico
20040073284 April 15, 2004 Bates et al.
20040220660 November 4, 2004 Shanley et al.
20040220665 November 4, 2004 Hossainy et al.
20040224003 November 11, 2004 Schultz
20040225345 November 11, 2004 Fischell et al.
20040234748 November 25, 2004 Stenzel
20040254635 December 16, 2004 Shanley et al.
20040267352 December 30, 2004 Davidson et al.
20050004661 January 6, 2005 Lewis
20050019404 January 27, 2005 Sung et al.
20050025799 February 3, 2005 Hossainy et al.
20050036946 February 17, 2005 Pathak et al.
20050106206 May 19, 2005 Herweck et al.
20050149173 July 7, 2005 Hunter et al.
20050163818 July 28, 2005 Sung et al.
20050163913 July 28, 2005 Spencer et al.
20050169957 August 4, 2005 Hossainy
20050178396 August 18, 2005 Hunter et al.
20050246009 November 3, 2005 Toner et al.
20050250672 November 10, 2005 Speck et al.
20060020243 January 26, 2006 Speck et al.
20060171984 August 3, 2006 Cromack et al.
20060198867 September 7, 2006 Toner et al.
20060204537 September 14, 2006 Ratner et al.
20070027523 February 1, 2007 Toner et al.
20070088255 April 19, 2007 Toner et al.
20070224240 September 27, 2007 Toner et al.
20080003254 January 3, 2008 Mack et al.
20080057101 March 6, 2008 Roorda
20080255508 October 16, 2008 Wang
20080262589 October 23, 2008 Nagura
20080300675 December 4, 2008 Penhasi
20090162413 June 25, 2009 Toner et al.
20090285974 November 19, 2009 Kerrigan
20100023108 January 28, 2010 Toner et al.
20100030183 February 4, 2010 Toner et al.
20100068170 March 18, 2010 Michal et al.
20100076377 March 25, 2010 Ehrenreich
20100076401 March 25, 2010 Von Oepen
20130297000 November 7, 2013 Toner et al.
Foreign Patent Documents
102007034991 January 2009 DE
0467606 January 1992 EP
0184162 April 1994 EP
0623354 November 1994 EP
WO 92/05179 April 1992 WO
WO 01/87372 November 2001 WO
WO 02/055122 July 2002 WO
WO 03/022324 March 2003 WO
WO 2004/022124 March 2004 WO
WO 2004/037443 May 2004 WO
WO2005/089855 September 2005 WO
WO 2006/024492 March 2006 WO
WO 2006/116348 November 2006 WO
WO 2007/032777 March 2007 WO
WO 2007/046935 April 2007 WO
WO 2007/065722 June 2007 WO
WO 2007/109372 September 2007 WO
WO 2008/021124 February 2008 WO
WO 2008/089730 July 2008 WO
WO 2009/051614 April 2009 WO
WO 2010/027735 March 2010 WO
WO 2010/030995 March 2010 WO
WO 2010/093799 August 2010 WO
Other references
  • U.S. Appl. No. 12/371,422, Jan. 20, 2012 Final Office Action.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 12/371,422, Jan. 6, 2012 Applicant Summary of Interview with Examiner.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 12/371,422, Dec. 30, 2011 Applicant Initiated Interview Summary.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 12/371,422, Dec. 22, 2011 Supplemental Response to Office Action.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 12/371,422, Nov. 7, 2011 Response to Office Action.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 12/371,426, Feb. 1, 2012 Final Office Action.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 12/371,426, Jan. 5, 2012 Applicant Initiated Interview Summary.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 12/371,426, Nov. 7, 2011 Response to Non-Final Office Action.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 11/483,030, Feb. 2, 2012 Non-Final Office Action.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 12/090,253, Dec. 8, 2011 Non-Final Office Action.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 11/539,944, Feb. 6, 2012 Non-Final Office Action.
  • International Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT/US2010/023907, Jun. 21, 2010, Abbott Laboratories.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 12/636,158, filed Dec. 11, 2009.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 12/636,124, filed Dec. 11, 2009.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 11/539,944, Non-final Office Action issued on Mar. 16, 2009.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 11/539,944, Response to the Non-final Office Action filed on Jun. 29, 2009.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 11/539,944, Final Office Action issued on Sep. 2, 2009.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 11/539,944, Feb. 2, 2010 Response to Final Office Action.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 11/539,944, Apr. 26, 2010 Preliminary amendment.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 11/539,944, May 12, 2010 Non-Final Office Action.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 11/539,944, Aug. 12, 2010 Response to Non-Final Office Action.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 11/548,827, May 29, 2009 Non-Final Office Action.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 11/548,827, Aug. 14, 2009 Response to Non-Final Office Action.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 11/548,827, Oct. 12, 2009 Response to Non-Final Office Action.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 11/548,827, Jan. 25, 2010 Final Office Action.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 11/548,827, Mar. 25, 2010 Response to Final Office Action.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 11/548,827, Apr. 21, 2010 Advisory Action.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 11/548,827, Apr. 28, 2010 Request for Continued Examination (RCE).
  • U.S. Appl. No. 11/084,172, Apr. 22, 2010 Response to Final Office Action and RCE.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 11/483,030, Non-final Office Action issued on Mar. 31, 2009.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 11/483,030, Response to the Non-final Office Action filed on Jun. 29, 2009.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 11/483,030, Final Office Action issued on Sep. 2, 2009.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 11/483,030, Feb. 2, 2010 Response to Final Office Action.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 11/483,030, Apr. 26, 2010 Preliminary Amendment and Applicant summary of interview with examiner.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 11/483,030, May 12, 2010 Non-Final Rejection.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 11/483,030, Aug. 12, 2010 Response to Non-Final Office Action.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 11/084,172, Restriction Requirement issued on Sep. 20, 2007.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 11/084,172, Response to the Restriction Requirement filed on Oct. 22, 2007.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 11/084,172, Non-Final Office Action issued on Jan. 9, 2008.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 11/084,172, Response to the Non-Final Office Action filed on Apr. 7, 2008.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 11/084,172, Final Office Action issued on Jul. 3, 2008.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 11/084,172, Response to the Final Office Action filed on Sep. 3, 2008.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 11/084,172, RCE filed on Dec. 31, 2008.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 11/084,172, Response to the Final Office Action filed on Jan. 22, 2009.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 11/084,172, Non-final Office Action issued on Apr. 29, 2009.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 11/084,172, Response to the Non-Final Office Action filed on Sep. 29, 2009.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 11/084,172, Jan. 22, 2010 Final Office Action.
  • The PCT Search Report for PCT/US2005/009310, filed Mar. 17, 2005, mailed Jul. 25, 2005.
  • Boland et al. International Journal of Cardiovascular Interventions, 2000, 3:215-225.
  • Wei et al. Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, 2001, 4:455-459.
  • Salem et al. International Archives of Allergy and Immunology, 2000 121:235-245.
  • Stella, “A Case for Prodrugs in Prodrugs: Challenges and Rewards Part I,” Eds. Stella et al. New York: Springer, 2007. 1-33.
  • International Search Report for PCT/US2006/040027.
  • International Search Report for PCT/US2007/021846.
  • Supplementary European Search Report for Appl. No. EP06825887.
  • Aggarwal, A., D.J. Schneider, B.E. Sobel, and H.L. Dauerman. 2003. “Comparison of inflammatory markers in patients with Diabetes mellitus versus those without before and after coronary arterial stenting.” Am J Cardiol. 92:924-9.
  • Baker, H., A. Sldorowicz, S.N. Sehgal, and C. Vezina. 1978. “Rapamycin (AY-22,989), a new antifungal antibiotic. Ill. In vitro and in vivo evaluation.” J Antibiot (Tokyo). 31 :539-45.
  • Bierer, B.E., S.L. Schreiber, and S.J. Burakoff. 1991. “The effect of the immunosuppressant FK-506 on alternate pathways of T cell activation.” Eur J lmrnuno. 21:439-45.
  • Biondi-Zoccai, G.G., A. Abbate, G. Liuzzo, and L.M. Biasucci. 2003. “Atherothrombosis, inflammation, and diabetes.”. J Am Coll Cardiol. 41 :1071-7.
  • Brown, E.J., M.W. Albers, T.B. Shin, K. Ichikawa, C.T. Keith, W.S. Lane, and S.L. Schreiber. 1994. “A mammalian protein targeted by GI-arresting rapamycin-receptor complex.” Nature. 369:756-8.
  • Bunchman, T.E., and C.A. Brookshire. 1991. “Smooth muscle cell proliferation by conditioned media from cyclosporinetreated endothelial cells: a role of endothelin.” Transplant Proc. 23:967-8.
  • Carter, A.J., M. Aggarwal, G.A. Kopia, F. Tio, P.S. Tsao, R. Kolata, A.C. Yeung, G. Llanos, J. Dooley, and R. Falotico.2004. “Long-term effects of polymer-based, slow-release, sirolimus-eluting stents in a porcine coronary model.” Cardiovasc Res. 63:617-24.
  • Dandona, P., and A. Aljada. 2002. “A rational approach to pathogenesis and treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus, insulin resistance, inflammation, and atherosclerosis.” Am J Cardiol. 90:27G-33G.
  • Dumont, F.J., M.R. Melino, M.J. Staruch, S.L. Koprak, P.A. Fischer, and N.H. Sigal. 1990. The immunosuppressive macrolides FK-506 and rapamycin act as reciprocal antagonists in murine T cells. J Immunol. 144:1418-24.
  • Fretz, H., M. Albers, A. Gala, R. Standaert, W. Lane, S. Burakoff, B. Bierer, and S. Schreiber. 1991. “Rapamycin and FK506 binding proteins (immunophilins).” J. Am. Chem. Soc. 113:1409-1411.
  • Grech, E.D., and D.R. Ramsdale. 2003. “Acute coronary syndrome: unstable angina and non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction.” British Med J. 326:1259-61.
  • Harding, M.W., A. Galat, D.E. Uehling, and S.L. Schreiber. 1989. “A receptor for the immunosuppressant FK506 is a cis-trans peptidyl-proyl isomerase.” Nature. 341:758-60.
  • Hayward, C., D. Yohannes, and S. Danishefsky. 1993. “Total synthesis of rapamycin via a novel titanium-mediated aldol macrocyclization reaction.” J. Am. Chem. Soc. 11 5:9345-9346.
  • Helmus, M. 1990. “Medical Device Design—A Systems Approach: Central Venous Catheters.” In 22nd International Society for the Advancement of Material and Process Engineering Technical Conference.
  • Ji, Q., M. Reimer, and T. El-Shourbagy. 2004.“96-well liquid-liquid extraction liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method for the quantitative determination of ABT-578 in human blood samples.” Journal of Chromatography B. 805:67-75.
  • Kino, T., N. Inamura, F. Sakai, K. Nakahara, T. Goto, M. Okuhara, M. Kohsaka, H. Aoki, and T. Ochiai. 1987. “Effect of FK-506 on human mixed lymphocyte reaction in vltro.” Transplant Proc. 19:36-9.
  • Kornowski, R., M.K. Hong, F.O. Tio, 0. Bramwell, H. Wu, and M.B. Leon. 1998. “In-stent restenosis: contributions of inflammatory responses and arterial injury to neointimal hyperplasia.” J Am Coll Cardiol. 31:224-30.
  • Martel, R.R., J. Klicius, and S. Galet. 1977. “Inhibition of the immune response by rapamycin, a new antifungal antibiotic.” Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 55:48-51.
  • Morris, R. 1992. “Rapamycins: antifungal, antitumor, antiproliferative, and immunosuppressive macrolides.” Transplant. Rev. 6:39-87.
  • Morris, R., and B. Meiser. 1989. “Identification of a new pharmacologic action for an old compound.” Med. Sci. Res. 17:609-610.
  • Nicolaou, K., T. Chakraborty, A. Piscopio, N. Minowa, and P. Bertinato. 1993. “Total synthesis of rapamycin.” J. Am. Chem. Soc. 115:4419-4420.
  • Paiva, N.L., A.L. Demain, and M.F. Roberts. 1991. “Incorporation of acetate, propionate, and methionine into rapamycin by Streptomyces hygroscopicus.” J Nat Prod. 54:167-77.
  • Roffi, M., and E.J. Topol. 2004. “Percutaneous coronary intervention in diabetic patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes.” Eur Heart J 25:190-8.
  • Romo, D., S. Meyer, D. Johsnon, and S. Sehrieber. 1993. “Total synthesis of (-)-rapamycin using an Evans-Tishchenko fragment coupling.” J. Am. Chem. Soc. 115:7906-7907.
  • Sabatini, D.M., H. Erdjument-Bromage, M. Lui, P. Tempst, and S.H. Snyder. 1994. “RAFTI: a mammalian protein that binds to FKBPIZ in a rapamycin-dependent fashion and is homologous to yeast TORS.” Cell. 78:35-43.
  • Schwartz, R. et al., 1992. “Restenosis and the proportional neointimal response to coronary artery injury: results in a porcine model.” J Am Coll Cardiol. 19:267-274.
  • Sehgal, S.N., H. Baker, C.P. Eng, K. Singh, and C. Vezina. 1983. “Demethoxyrapamycin (AY-24,668), a new antifungal antibiotic.” J Antibiot (Tokyo). 36:351-4.
  • Sehgal, S.N., H. Baker, and C. Vezina. 1975. “Rapamycin (AY-22,989), a new antifungal antibiotic. II. Fermentation, isolation and characterization.” J Antibiot (Tokyo). 28:727-32.
  • Shichiri, M., Y. Hirata, T. Nakajima, K. Ando, T. Imai, M. Yanagisawa, T. Masaki, and F. Marumo. 1991. “Endothelin-I is an autocrine/paracrine growth factor for human cancer cell lines.” J Clin Invest. 87:1867-71.
  • Siekierka, J.J., S.H. Hung, M. Poe, C.S. Lin, and N.H. Sigal. 1989. “A cytosolic binding protein for the immunosuppressant FK506 has peptidyl-prolyl isomerase activity but is distinct from cyclophilin.” Nature. 341 :755-7.
  • Suzuki, T., G. Kopia, S. Hayashi, L.R. Bailey, G. Llanos, R. Wilensky, B.D. Klugherz, G. Papandreou, P. Narayan, M.B. Leon, A.C. Yeung, F. Tio, P.S. Tsao, R. Falotico, and A.J. Carter. 2001. “Stent-based delivery of sirolimus reduces neointimal formation in a porcine coronary model.” Circulation. 104:1188-93.
  • Vezina, C., A. Kudelski, and S.N. Sehgal. 1975. “Rapamycin (AY-22,989), a new antifungal antibiotic. I. Taxonomy of the producing streptomycete and isolation of the active principle.” J Antibiot (Tokyo). 28:721-6.
  • Yamagishi, S., C.C. Hsu, K. Kobayashi, and H. Yamamoto. 1993. “Endothelin 1 mediates endothelial cell-dependent proliferation of vascular pericytes.” Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 191:840-6.
  • Yudkin, J.S., M. Kumari, S.E. Humphries, and V. Mohamed-Ali. 2000. “Inflammation, obesity, stress and coronary heart disease: is interleukin-6 the LINK?” Atherosclerosis. 148:209-14.
  • Levin et al., “Specific binding to intracellular proteins determines arterial transport properties for rapamycin and paclitaxel.” PNAS vol. 101, No. 25, pp. 9463-9467 (2004).
  • Van der Hoeven et al., “Drug-eluting stents: results, promises and problems,” Int. J. of Cardiology 99, pp. 9-17 (2005).
  • Unverdorben et al., 2009, “Paclitaxel-coated balloon catheter versus paclitaxel-coated stent for the treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis.” Circulation 119:2986-2994.
  • Stiles, “Paclitaxel-coated balloon cuts late lumen loss after PCI for in-stent restenosis,” The Heart.org from WebMD, Apr. 4, 2008. Downloaded from <http://www.theheart.org/article/855221/print.do> on Sep. 28, 2009.
  • B. Braun Melsungen A.G. Press Release, “Drug-coated balloon overcomes in-stent restenosis,” Apr. 2, 2008. B. Braun Melsungen A.G. website. Downloaded from <http://www.bbraun.com/cps/rde/xchg/bbraun-com/hs.xsl/newsdrug-coated-balloon-overcomes-in-stent-restenosis.html?from=newssearch> on Sep. 28, 2010.
  • Burke et al., “Zotarolimus (ABT-578) eluting stents”, Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, Mar. 6, 2006, 58: 437-446.
  • International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2010/023910.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 12/636,158, Oct. 12, 2011 Non-Final Office Action.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 12/371,426, Aug. 5, 2011 Non-Final Office Action.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 12/371,422, Aug. 5, 2011 Non-Final Office Action.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 11/084,172, Sep. 23, 2011 Issue Fee Paid.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 11/084,172, Sep. 19, 2011 Notice of Allowance.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 11/548,827, Aug. 3, 2011 Request for Continued Examination (RCE).
  • U.S. Appl. No. 11/548,827, May 3, 2011 Final Office Action.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 12/090,253, Sep. 26, 2011 Response to Restriction Requirement.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 12/090,253, Aug. 24, 2011 Restriction Requirement.
  • Reil et al., Journal of Surgical Research, 1999, 85: 109-114.
  • Roberge et al., Ocular Immunology and Inflammation, 1995, 3: 195-202.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 11/539,944, Mar. 16, 2009 Non-final Office Action.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 11/539,944, Jun. 29, 2009 Response to the Non-final Office Action.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 11/539,944, Sep. 2, 2009 Final Office Action.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 11/548,827, Oct. 1, 2010 Non-Final Office Action.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 11/548,827, Mar. 1, 2011 Response to Non-Final Office Action.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 11/483,030, Mar. 31, 2009 Non-final Office Action.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 11/483,030, Jun. 29, 2009 Response to the Non-final Office Action.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 11/483,030, Sep. 2, 2009 Final Office Action.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 11/483,030, Oct. 29, 2010 Final Office Action.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 11/483,030, Jan. 31, 2011 Request for Continued Examination (RCE).
  • U.S. Appl. No. 11/084,172, Sep. 20, 2007 Restriction Requirement.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 11/084,172, Oct. 22, 2007 Response to the Restriction Requirement.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 11/084,172, Jan. 9, 2008 Non-Final Office Action.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 11/084,172, Apr. 7, 2008 Response to the Non-Final Office Action.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 11/084,172, Jul. 3, 2008 Final Office Action.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 11/084,172, Sep. 3, 2008 Response to the Final Office Action.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 11/084,172, Dec. 31, 2008 Request for Continued Examination (RCE).
  • U.S. Appl. No. 11/084,172, Jan. 22, 2009 Response to the Final Office Action.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 11/084,172, Apr. 29, 2009 Non-final Office Action.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 11/084,172, Sep. 29, 2009 Response to the Non-Final Office Action.
  • International Search Report for PCT/US2005/009310.
  • International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2010/055806.
  • Partial International Search Report for PCT/US2010/055809.
  • International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2010/055818.
  • International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2010/023907.
  • European Search Report issued on Mar. 1, 2011 in application No. EP10011851.2. (corresponding to US 2010/0030183A1).
  • Aggarwal, A., D.J. Schneider, B.E. Sobel, and H.L. Dauerman. 2003. “Comparison of inflammatory markers in patients with diabetes mellitus versus those without before and after coronary arterial stenting.” Am J Cardiol 92:924-9.
  • B. Braun Melsungen A.G. Press release, “Drug-coated balloon overcomes in-stent restenosis,” Apr. 2, 2008. B. Braun Melsungen A.G. website. Downloaded from <http://www.bbraun.com/cps/rde/xchg/bbraun-com/hs.xs1/newsdrug-coated-balloon-overcomes-in-stent-restenosis.html?from=newssearch> on Sep. 28, 2010.
  • Carter, A.J., M. Aggarwal, G.A. Kopia, F. Tio, P.S. Tsao, R. Kolata, A.C. Yeung, G. Lianas, J. Dooley, and R. Falotico.2004. “Long-term effects of polymer-based, slow-release, sirolimus-eluting stents in a porcine coronary model.” Cardiovasc Res. 63:617-24.
  • Cremers, et al., “Inhibition of Coronary Neointimal Hyperplasia in Swine Using a Novel Zotarolimus-Eluting Balloon Catheter”, European Society of Cardiology, XP002616155, Aug. 31, 2009, URL:HTTP://spo.escardio.org/eslides/view.aspx?eevtid=33&fp=3206.
  • Grech, E.D., and D.R. Ramsdale. 2003. “Acute coronary syndrome: unstable angina and non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction.” British Med. J. 326:1259-61.
  • Kino, T., N. Inamura, F. Sakai, K. Nakahara, T. Goto, M. Okuhara, M. Kohsaka, H. Aoki, and T. Ochiai. 1987. “Effect of FK-506 on human mixed lymphocyte reaction in vitro.” Transplant Proc. 19:36-9.
  • Richard, et al., “Controlled Delivery of Paclitaxel from stent Coatings Using Novel Styrene Maleic Anhydride Copolymer Formulations”, Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, vol. 90A, No. 2, pp. 522-523, Jun. 18, 2008, www.interscience.wiley.com.
  • Roffi, M., and E.J. Topol. 2004. “Percutaneous coronary intervention in diabetic patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes.” Eur Heart J. 25:190-8.
  • Romo, D., S. Meyer, D. Johsnon, and S. Schrieber. 1993. “Total synthesis of (-)-rapamycin using an Evans-Tishchenko fragment coupling.” J. Am. Chem. Soc. 115:7906-7907.
  • Shichiri, M., Y. Hirata, T, Nakajima, K. Ando, T. Imai, M. Yanagisawa, T. Masaki, and F. Marumo. 1991. “Endothelin-I is an autocrine/paracrine growth factor for human cancer cell lines.” J Clin Invest. 87:1867-71.
  • Van der Hoeven et al., “Drug-eluting stents: results, promises and problems,” Int. J of Cardiology 99, pp. 9-17 (2005).
  • U.S. Appl. No. 12/371,422, Apr. 20, 2012 Amendment and Request for Continued Examination (RCE).
  • U.S. Appl. No. 12/371,426, May 1, 2012 Amendment and Request for Continued Examination (RCE).
  • U.S. Appl. No. 11/483,030, May 2, 2012 Response to Non-Final Office Action.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 11/539,944, May 7, 2012 Response to Non-Final Office Action.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 12/636,158, May 23, 2012 Final Office Action.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 12/371,426, Aug. 27, 2012 Supplemental Amendment and Statement of the Substance of the Interview.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 12/371,426, Aug. 2, 2012 Applicant-Initiated Interview Summary.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 12/371,422, Aug. 27, 2012 Filed Supplemental Amendment, Statement of the Subastance of the Interview and Supplemental Declaration.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 12/371,422, Jul. 25, 2012 Applicant-Initiated Interview Summary.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 12/636,158, Aug. 30, 2012 Applicant-Initiated Interview Summary.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 12/636,158, Aug. 20, 2012 Applicant-Initiated Interview Summary.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 12/090,253, Jun. 1, 2012 Final Office Action.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 12/090,253, Apr. 9, 2012 Response to Non-Final Office Action.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 11/483,030, Jul. 19, 2012 Final Office Action.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 11/539,944, Aug. 3, 2012 Final Office Action.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 12/363,124, Jul. 16, 2012 Response to Non-Final Office Action.
  • Heldman, et al., “Paclitaxel stent coating inhibits neointimal hyperplasia at 4 weeks in a porcine model of coronary restenosis”, Circulation, 103(18):2289-95 (2001).
  • U.S. Appl. No. 13/617,628, Nov. 30, 2012 Non-Final Office Action.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 11/548,827, Dec. 24, 2012 Examiner Initiated Interview Summary.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 11/548,827, Nov. 9, 2012 Notice of Allowance.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 12/371,422, Dec. 20, 2012 Notice of Allowance.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 12/090,253, Dec. 28, 2012 Notice of Abandonment.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 12/636,124, Dec. 21, 2012 Response to Final Office Action.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 13/617,628, filed Sep. 14, 2012.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 12/636,124, Oct. 22, 2012 Final Office Action.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 12/636,158, Oct. 23, 2012 Amendment and Request for Continued Examination (RCE).
  • U.S. Appl. No. 12/636,124, Mar. 15, 2012 Non-Final Office Action.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 12/636,158, Mar. 12, 2012 Response to Non-Final Office Action.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 12/371,426, Apr. 2, 2012 Response to Final Office Action.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 13/911,962, filed Jun. 6, 2013.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 13/617,628, Jul. 3, 2013 Issue Fee payment.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 11/539,944, Jun. 20, 2013 Non-Final Office Action.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 12/371,426, Jun. 28, 2013 Non-Final Office Action.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 13/617,628, Apr. 3, 2013 Notice of Allowance.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 13/617,628, Feb. 28, 2013 Response to Non-Final Office Action.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 12/371,422, Mar. 20, 2013 Issue Fee payment.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 12/636,124, Mar. 6, 2013 Notice of Allowance.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 13/935,025, Aug. 11, 2014 Response to Non-Final Office Action.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 12/636,158, Aug. 13, 2014 Non-Final Office Action.
Patent History
Patent number: 8951595
Type: Grant
Filed: Dec 11, 2009
Date of Patent: Feb 10, 2015
Patent Publication Number: 20110143014
Assignee: Abbott Cardiovascular Systems Inc. (Santa Clara, CA)
Inventors: John Stankus (Campbell, CA), Mikael Trollsas (San Jose, CA), Syed Hossainy (Hayward, CA), Stephen Pacetti (San Jose, CA), Michael Ngo (San Jose, CA)
Primary Examiner: Dah-Wei D. Yuan
Assistant Examiner: Andrew Bowman
Application Number: 12/636,079
Classifications