Hybrid and tandem expression of proteins

Two or more Neisserial proteins are joined such that they are translated as a single polypeptide chain. Hybrid proteins are represented by the formula NH2-A-[-X-L-]n-B—COOH where X is an amino acid sequence, L is an optional linker amino acid sequence, A is an optional N-terminal amino acid sequence, B is an optional C-terminal amino acid sequence, and n is an integer greater than I. Proteins where each of the n-X— moieties shares sequence identity to each other —X— moiety, the protein is a ‘tandem protein’.

Skip to: Description  ·  Claims  ·  References Cited  · Patent History  ·  Patent History
Description
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a Continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/488,786, filed Feb. 25, 2005, which is the National Stage of International Patent Application of PCT/IB02/03904, filed Sep. 6, 2002, which claims the benefit of United Kingdom Patent Application Serial No. 0121591.2, filed Sep. 6, 2001, each of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.

SUBMISSION OF SEQUENCE LISTING ON ASCII TEXT FILE

The content of the following submission on ASCII text file is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety: a computer readable form (CRF) of the Sequence Listing (file name: 223002100601SubSeqList.txt, date recorded: Aug. 8, 2013, size: 83 KB).

TECHNICAL FIELD

This invention is in the field of protein expression. In particular, it relates to the expression of proteins from Neisseria (e.g. N. gonorrhoeae or, preferably, N. meningitidis).

BACKGROUND ART

References 1 and 2 disclose alternative and improved approaches for the expression of the Neisserial proteins disclosed in references 3 to 6. One such method is to produce ‘hybrid’ proteins in which two or more Neisserial proteins are expressed as a single polypeptide chain. This approach offers two advantages. First, a protein that may be unstable or poorly expressed on its own can be assisted by adding a suitable hybrid partner that overcomes the problem. Second, commercial manufacture is simplified as only one expression and purification need be employed in order to produce two separately-useful proteins.

It is an object of the present invention to provide further alternative and improved approaches for the expression of Neisserial proteins.

DISCLOSURE OF THE INVENTION

Hybrid Proteins

Thus the invention provides a method for the simultaneous expression of two or more (e.g. 3, 4, 5, 6 or more) Neisserial proteins, in which said two or more proteins are joined such that they are translated as a single polypeptide chain. In general, the hybrid proteins of the invention can be represented by the formula:
NH2-A-[-X-L-]n-B—COOH
wherein X is an amino acid sequence, L is an optional linker amino acid sequence, A is an optional N-terminal amino acid sequence, B is an optional C-terminal amino acid sequence, and n is an integer greater than 1.

The value of n is between 2 and x, and the value of x is typically 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 or 10. Preferably n is 2, 3 or 4; it is more preferably 2 or 3; most preferably, n=2.

The —X— Moieties

There are two main groups of hybrid proteins according to the invention. These two groups are not mutually exclusive.

In the first group, each —X— moiety is:

    • (a) an orf1, orf4, orf25, orf40, orf46.1, orf83, NMB1343, 230, 233, 287, 292, 594, 687, 736, 741, 907, 919, 936, 953, 961 or 983 amino acid sequence;
    • (b) an amino acid sequence having sequence identity to an amino acid sequence from (a); or
    • (c) an amino acid sequence comprising a fragment of an amino acid sequence from (a).

A preferred subset of (a) is: orf46.1, 230, 287, 741, 919, 936, 953, 961 and 983. A more preferred subset of (a) is: orf46.1, 287, 741 and 961. FIG. 3 shows preferred hybrid proteins.

In the second group, the hybrid protein comprises a first —X— moiety (—Xa—) and a second —X— moiety (—Xb—). The —Xa— moiety has one of the following amino acid sequences:

    • (d) the 446 even SEQ IDs (i.e. 2, 4, 6, . . . , 890, 892) disclosed in reference 3.
    • (e) the 45 even SEQ IDs (i.e. 2, 4, 6, . . . , 88, 90) disclosed in reference 4;
    • (f) the 1674 even SEQ IDs 2-3020, even SEQ IDs 3040-3114, and all SEQ IDs 3115-3241, disclosed in reference 5;
    • (g) the 2160 amino acid sequences NMB0001 to NMB2160 from reference 7; or
    • (h) an amino acid sequence disclosed in reference 1 or reference 2.

The —Xb— moiety is related to —Xa— such that: (i) —Xb— has sequence identity to —Xa—, and/or (j) —Xb— comprises a fragment of —Xa—.

Examples of this second type of hybrid protein include proteins in which two or more —X— moieties are identical, or in which they are variants of the same protein e.g. two polymorphic forms of the same protein may be expressed as —Xa—Xb—, and three polymorphic forms may be expressed as —Xa—Xb—Xc— etc.

The —Xa— and —Xb— moieties may be in either order from N-terminus to C-terminus.

The —Xa— moiety is preferably an orf1, orf4, orf25, orf40, orf46.1, orf83, NMB 1343, 230, 233, 287, 292, 594, 687, 736, 741, 907, 919, 936, 953, 961 or 983 amino acid sequence. The —Xa— moiety is more preferably an orf46.1, 230, 287, 741, 919, 936, 953, 961 or 983 amino acid sequence. The —Xa— moiety is most preferably an orf46.1, 287, 741 or 961 amino acid sequence.

In proteins where each of the n —X— moieties shares sequence identity to each other —X— moiety, the protein is referred to as a ‘tandem protein’. Tandem proteins in which n=2 are preferred.

The degree of ‘sequence identity’ referred to in (b) and (i) is preferably greater than 50% (eg. 60%, 70%, 80%, 90%, 95%, 99% or more, up to 100%). This includes mutants, homologs, orthologs, allelic variants etc. [e.g. see ref. 8]. Identity is preferably determined by the Smith-Waterman homology search algorithm as implemented in the MPSRCH program (Oxford Molecular), using an affine gap search with parameters gap open penalty=12 and gap extension penalty=1. Typically, 50% identity or more between two proteins is considered as an indication of functional equivalence.

The ‘fragment’ referred to in (c) and (j) should consist of least m consecutive amino acids from an amino acid sequence from (a), (d), (e), (f), (g) or (h) and, depending on the particular sequence, m is 7 or more (eg. 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 100, 150, 200 or more).

Preferably the fragment comprises an epitope from an amino acid sequence from (a), (d), (e), (f), (g) or (h). Preferred fragments are those disclosed in references 9 and 10.

Preferred (c) and (j) fragments are C- and/or N-terminal truncations (e.g. Δ1-287, Δ2-287 etc.).

Preferred (b), (c), (i) and (j) sequences omit poly-glycine sequences. This has been found to aid expression [ref. 2]. Poly-glycine sequences can be represented as (Gly)g, where g≧3 (e.g. 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 or more). If a —X— moiety includes a poly-glycine sequence in its wild-type form, it is preferred to omit this sequence in the hybrid proteins of the invention. This may be by disrupting or removing the (Gly)g—by deletion (e.g. CGGGGS→CGGGS, CGGS, CGS or CS), by substitution (e.g. CGGGGS→CGXGGS, CGXXGS, CGXGXS etc.), and/or by insertion (e.g. CGGGGS→CGGXGGS, CGXGGGS, etc.). Deletion of (Gly)g is preferred, and deletion of the N-terminus portion of a protein up to and including the poly-glycine sequence (e.g. deletion of residues 1-32 in SEQ ID 1) is referred to herein as ‘ΔG’. Poly-glycine omission is particularly useful for proteins 287, 741, 983 and Tbp2 (ΔG287, ΔG741, ΔG983 and ΔGTbp2—references 1 & 2).

Preferred (c) and (j) fragments omit complete protein domains. This is particularly useful for protein 961, 287, and ORF46. Once a protein has been notional divided into domains, (c) and (j) fragments can omit one or more of these domains (e.g. 287B, 287C, 287BC, ORF461-433, ORF46434-608, 961c—reference 2; FIGS. 4 and 5 herein).

287 protein has been notionally split into three domains, referred to as A, B & C (see FIG. 5 of reference 2). Domain B aligns with IgA proteases, domain C aligns with transferrin-binding proteins, and domain A shows no strong alignment with database sequences. An alignment of polymorphic forms of 287 is disclosed in reference 8.

ORF46 has been notionally split into two domains—a first domain (amino acids 1-433; ORF46.1) which is well-conserved between species and serogroups, and a second domain (amino acids 434-608) which is not well-conserved. The second domain is preferably deleted, leaving ORF46.1. An alignment of polymorphic forms of ORF46 is disclosed in reference 8.

961 protein has been notionally split into several domains (FIG. 4).

If a —X— moiety has a leader peptide sequence in its wild-type form, this may be included or omitted in the hybrid proteins of the invention. Where the leader peptide is omitted, this is a preferred example of an amino acid sequence within (c) and (j). In one embodiment, the leader peptides will be deleted except for that of the —X— moiety located at the N-terminus of the hybrid protein i.e. the leader peptide of X1 will be retained, but the leader peptides of X2 . . . Xn will be omitted. This is equivalent to deleting all leader peptides and using the leader peptide of X1 as moiety -A-.

When n=2, preferred pairs of —X— moieties are: ΔG287 and 230; ΔG287 and 936; ΔG287 and 741; 961c and 287; 961c and 230; 961c and 936; 961cL and 287; 961cL and 230; 961cL and 936; ORF46.1 and 936; ORF46.1 and 230; 230 and 961; 230 and 741; 936 and 961; 936 and 741. When n=2, preferred pairs of —X— moieties for tandem proteins are: ΔG741 and 741; ΔG287 and 287. More specifically, the following combinations of X1 and X2 are preferred when n=2:

X1 X2 X1 X2 ΔG287 230 230 ΔG287 ΔG287 936 936 ΔG287 ΔG287 741 741 ΔG287 ΔG287 961 961 ΔG287 ΔG287 ORF46.1 ORF46.1 ΔG287 ΔG287 919 919 ΔG287 ΔG287 953 953 ΔG287 961c 287 287 961c 961c 230 230 961c 961c 936 936 961c 961c 741 741 961c 961c 983 983 961c 961c ΔG983 ΔG983 961c 961c ORF46.1 ORF46.1 961c 961 ORF46.1 ORF46.1 961 961cL 287 287 961cL 961cL 230 230 961cL 961cL 936 936 961cL ORF46.1 936 936 ORF46.1 ORF46.1 230 230 ORF46.1 ORF46.1 741 741 ORF46.1 ORF46.1 ΔG741 ΔG741 ORF46.1 ORF46.1 983 983 ORF46.1 ORF46.1 ΔG983 ΔG983 ORF46.1 230 961 961 230 230 741 741 230 230 ΔG741 ΔG741 230 936 961 961 936 936 741 741 936 936 ΔG741 ΔG741 936 ΔG741 741 ΔG287 287 ORF46.1 983 983 ORF46.1 ΔG741 ORF46.1 ORF46.1 ΔG741 ΔG741 983 983 ΔG741 ΔG741 961 961 ΔG741 ΔG741 961c 961c ΔG741 ΔG983 ORF46.1 ORF46.1 ΔG983 ΔG983 961 961 ΔG983 ΔG983 961c 961c ΔG983

Where 287 is used in full-length form, it is preferably at the C-terminal end of a hybrid protein; if it is to be used at the N-terminus, if is preferred to use a ΔG form of 287. Similarly, Where 741 is used in full-length form, it is preferably at the C-terminal end of a hybrid protein; if it is to be used at the N-terminus, if is preferred to use a ΔG form of 741.

The -L- Moieties

For each n instances of [—X-L-], linker amino acid sequence -L- may be present or absent. For instance, when n=2 the hybrid may be NH2—X1-L1-X2-L2-COOH, NH2—X1—X2—COOH, NH2—X1-L1-X2—COOH, NH2—X1—X2-L2-COOH, etc.

Linker amino acid sequence(s) -L- will typically be short (e.g. 20 or fewer amino acids i.e. 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1). Examples include short peptide sequences which facilitate cloning, poly-glycine linkers (i.e. Glyn where n=2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 or more), and histidine tags (i.e. Hisn where n=3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 or more). Other suitable linker amino acid sequences will be apparent to those skilled in the art. A useful linker is GSGGGG (SEQ ID 27), with the Gly-Ser dipeptide being formed from a BamHI restriction site, thus aiding cloning and manipulation, and the Gly4 tetrapeptide being a typical poly-glycine linker.

If Xn+1 is a ΔG protein and Ln is a glycine linker, this may be equivalent to Xn+1 not being a ΔG protein and Ln being absent.

The -A- Moiety

-A- is an optional N-terminal amino acid sequence. This will typically be short (e.g. 40 or fewer amino acids i.e. 39, 38, 37, 36, 35, 34, 33, 32, 31, 30, 29, 28, 27, 26, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1). Examples include leader sequences to direct protein trafficking, or short peptide sequences which facilitate cloning or purification (e.g. histidine tags i.e. Hisn where n=3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 or more). Other suitable N-terminal amino acid sequences will be apparent to those skilled in the art. If X1 lacks its own N-terminus methionine, -A- may be a methionine residue.

The —B— Moiety

—B— is an optional C-terminal amino acid sequence. This will typically be short (e.g. 40 or fewer amino acids i.e. 39, 38, 37, 36, 35, 34, 33, 32, 31, 30, 29, 28, 27, 26, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1). Examples include sequences to direct protein trafficking, short peptide sequences which facilitate cloning or purification (e.g. comprising histidine tags i.e. Hisn where n=3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 or more), or sequences which enhance protein stability. Other suitable C-terminal amino acid sequences will be apparent to those skilled in the art.

Polymorphic Forms of Proteins

The invention can use amino acid sequences from any strains of N. meningitidis. References to a particular protein (e.g. ‘287’, or ‘ORF46.1’) therefore include that protein from any strain. Sequence variations between strains are included within (b), (c), (i) and (j).

Reference sequences from N. meningitidis serogroup B include:

Protein Reference Protein Reference orf1 Ref. 3, SEQ ID 650 orf4 Ref. 3, SEQ ID 218 orf25 Ref. 3, SEQ ID 684 orf40 Ref. 4, SEQ ID 4 orf46 Ref. 6, SEQ ID 1049 orf83 Ref. 3, SEQ ID 314 NMB1343 Ref. 7, NMB1343 230 Ref. 5, SEQ ID 830 233 Ref. 5, SEQ ID 860 287 Ref. 5, SEQ ID 3104 292 Ref. 5, SEQ ID 1220 594 Ref. 5, SEQ ID 1862 687 Ref. 5, SEQ ID 2282 736 Ref. 5, SEQ ID 2506 741 Ref. 5, SEQ ID 2536 907 Ref. 5, SEQ ID 2732 919 Ref. 5, SEQ ID 3070 936 Ref. 5, SEQ ID 2884 953 Ref. 5, SEQ ID 2918 961 Ref. 5, SEQ ID 940 983 Ref. 7, NMB1969

Reference 8 discloses polymorphic forms of proteins ORF4, ORF40, ORF46, 225, 235, 287, 519, 726, 919 and 953. Polymorphic forms of 961 are disclosed in references 11 & 12. Any of these polymorphic forms may be used in accordance with the present invention.

The sequence listing herein includes polymorphic forms of proteins 741 (SEQ IDs 1-22) and NMB1343 (SEQ IDs 23-24) which have been identified. The sequence listing herein includes the amino acid sequence set forth as SEQ ID NO: 1202 in WO99/57280, which corresponds to SEQ ID NO: 41 of the present application. The sequence listing herein includes the amino acid sequence set forth as SEQ ID NO: 2918 in WO99/57280, which corresponds to SEQ ID NO: 42 of the present application. The sequence listing herein includes the amino acid sequence set forth as SEQ ID NO: 2884 in WO99/57280, which corresponds to SEQ ID NO: 43 of the present application. The sequence listing herein includes the amino acid sequence set forth as SEQ ID NO: 2536 in WO99/57280 which corresponds to SEQ ID NO: 44 of the present application.

Serogroups and Strains

Preferred proteins of the invention comprise —X— moieties having an amino acid sequence found in N. meningitidis serogroup B. Within a single protein of the invention, individual —X— moieties may be from one or more strains. Where n=2, for instance, X2 may be from the same strain as X1 or from a different strain. Where n=3, the strains might be (i) X1═X2═X3 (ii) X1═X2≠X3 (iii) X1≠X2═X3 (iv) X1≠X2≠X3 or (v) X1═X3≠X2, etc.

Within serogroup B, preferred —X— moieties are from strains 2996, MC58, 95N477, or 394/98. Strain 95N477 is sometimes referred to herein as ‘ET37’, this being its electrophoretic type. Strain 394/98 is sometimes referred to herein as ‘nz’, as it is a New Zealand strain.

Where a form of 287 is used, this is preferably from strain 2996 or from strain 394/98.

Where a form of 741 is used, this is preferably from serogroup B strains MC58, 2996, 394/98, or 95N477, or from serogroup C strain 90/18311.

Where a form of 961 is used, this is preferably from strain 2996.

Strains are indicated as a subscript e.g. 741MC58 is protein 741 from strain MC58. Unless otherwise stated, proteins mentioned herein (e.g. with no subscript) are from N. meningitidis strain 2996, which can be taken as a ‘reference’ strain. It will be appreciated, however, that the invention is not in general limited by strain. As mentioned above, general references to a protein (e.g. ‘287’, ‘919’ etc.) may be taken to include that protein from any strain. This will typically have sequence identity to 2996 of 90% or more (eg. 91%, 92%, 93%, 94%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, 99% or more).

Domain-Based Expression of Protein 961

References 1 and 2 disclose how a protein can be notionally divided into domains and how the protein can be manipulated based on these domains. The present invention extends the application of this approach to protein 961 (also known as ‘NadA’ [11,12]).

In N. meningitidis serogroup B strain 2996, NadA has 405 amino acids. This protein has notionally been divided into the following nine domains (FIG. 4):

Domain name Amino acids 961-1 ‘L’  1-23 961-2  24-87 961-3  88-143 961-4 144-180 961-5 181-268 961-6 269-286 961-7 287-330 961-8 331-350 961-9 351-405

This information can be used to locate the same domains in other forms of 961.

These domains have been deleted from 961 in strain 2996 in various ways (FIG. 5). Preferred fragments of 961 omit one or more of these nine domains e.g. the following:

    • 961-2 to 961-5 (‘961a’)
    • 961-6 to 961-9 (‘961b’)
    • 961-1 to 961-8 (‘961cL’)
    • 961-2 to 961-8 (‘961c’)
    • 961-2 to 961-6 and amino acids 287-325 from domain 961-7 (‘961d’)
    • 961-2 to 961-8 and amino acids 351-383 from domain 961-9 (‘961Δ1’)
    • 961-1 to 961-8 and amino acids 351-383 from domain 961-9 (‘961Δ1L’)
    • 961-1 to 961-7 and amino acids 331-343 from domain 961-8 (‘961cL-Δaro’)
    • 961-1 to 961-6 and amino acids 287-315 from domain 961-7 (‘961cL-Δcc’)
    • 961-1 to 961-5 (‘961aL’)
    • 961-1 to 961-4 (‘961aL-Δ1’)
    • 961-1 to 961-3 (‘961aL-Δ2’)
    • 961-1 to 961-2 (‘961aL-Δ3’)

These thirteen fragments (and sub-fragments thereof missing 1, 2, 3, 4 or 5 amino acids at either or both ends) are preferred (c) and (j) fragments, but they may also be expressed in their own right i.e. not in the form of a hybrid protein of the invention. Thus the invention provides a protein comprising one of these fragments, providing that the protein is not full-length 961 and is not a protein specifically disclosed in reference 1 or 2. This protein may be a fusion protein (e.g. a GST-fusion or a His-tag fusion).

Sequences

The invention also provides a protein having an amino acid sequence from SEQ IDs 1 to 24. It also provides proteins and nucleic acid having sequence identity to these. As described above, the degree of ‘sequence identity’ is preferably greater than 50% (eg. 60%, 70%, 80%, 90%, 95%, 99% or more).

The invention also provides nucleic acid encoding such proteins.

Furthermore, the invention provides nucleic acid which can hybridise to this nucleic acid, preferably under “high stringency” conditions (eg. 65° C. in a 0.1×SSC, 0.5% SDS solution).

The invention also provides nucleic acid encoding proteins according to the invention.

It should also be appreciated that the invention provides nucleic acid comprising sequences complementary to those described above (eg. for antisense or probing purposes).

Nucleic acid according to the invention can, of course, be prepared in many ways (eg. by chemical synthesis, from genomic or cDNA libraries, from the organism itself etc.) and can take various forms (eg. single stranded, double stranded, vectors, probes etc.).

In addition, the term “nucleic acid” includes DNA and RNA, and also their analogues, such as those containing modified backbones, and also peptide nucleic acids (PNA) etc.

Mixtures

The invention also provides a composition comprising two or more (i.e. 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 or 7) of the following proteins:

    • (1) 287
    • (2) 741
    • (3) ORF46.1
    • (4) 961
    • (5) NH2-A-[-X-L-]n-B—COOH, wherein n=2, X1=287, X2=953
    • (6) NH2-A-[-X-L-]n-B—COOH, wherein n=2, X1=287, X2=919
    • (7) NH2-A-[-X-L-]n-B—COOH, wherein n=2, X1=287, X2=961

The mixture may include one or both of the following proteins, either in combination with two or more of (1) to (7), or in combination with only one of (1) to (7):

    • (8) NH2-A-[-X-L-]n-B—COOH, wherein n=2, X1=287, X2=741
    • (9) NH2-A-[-X-L-]n-B—COOH, wherein n=2, X1=936, X2=741

Where proteins 287 and 741 are included in the mixture (i.e. in protein 1, 2, 5, 6, 7 or 8), they may be in the ‘ΔG’ form. Where protein 961 is included, it is preferably in the form of ‘961c’ in which the N-terminus leader and C-terminus membrane anchor are absent [e.g. see refs. 1, 2 & 11].

A preferred mixture comprises the following three proteins:

    • (1) 961c, preferably 961c2996 (e.g. SEQ ID 31 herein);
    • (2) NH2-A-[-X-L-]n-B—COOH, wherein n is 2, —X1— is ΔG287 (preferably ΔG287NZ), —X2— is 953 (preferably 9532996) lacking its leader peptide, -L1- is GSGGGG, and -A- comprises a N-terminus methionine (e.g. -A- is M or MA) (e.g. SEQ IDs 28 & 29 herein); and
    • (3) NH2-A-[-X-L-]n-B—COOH, wherein n=2, X1=936 (preferably 9362996), X2=ΔG741 (preferably ΔG741MC58), L1=GSGGGG (e.g. SEQ ID 30 herein).

The mixtures may also comprise N. meningitidis outer membrane vesicles.

Heterologous Host

Whilst expression of the proteins of the invention may take place in Neisseria, the present invention preferably utilises a heterologous host. The heterologous host may be prokaryotic (e.g. a bacterium) or eukaryotic. It is preferably E. coli, but other suitable hosts include Bacillus subtilis, Vibrio cholerae, Salmonella typhi, Salmonenna typhimurium, Neisseria lactamica, Neisseria cinerea, Mycobacteria (e.g. M. tuberculosis), yeast etc.

Vectors Etc.

The invention provides (a) nucleic acid encoding the proteins described above (b) vectors comprising these nucleic acid sequences (c) host cells containing said vectors (d) compositions comprising the proteins or nucleic acids of the invention, which may be suitable as immunogenic compositions (e.g. vaccines) or as diagnostic reagents (e) these compositions for use as medicaments (e.g. as vaccines) or as diagnostic reagents (f) the use of these compositions in the manufacture of (1) a medicament for treating or preventing infection due to Neisserial bacteria (2) a diagnostic reagent for detecting the presence of Neisserial bacteria or of antibodies raised against Neisseria bacteria, and/or (3) a reagent which can raise antibodies against Neisseria bacteria and (g) a method of treating a patient, comprising administering to the patient a therapeutically effective amount of these compositions.

Implementing the invention will typically involve the basic steps of: obtaining a first nucleic acid encoding a first protein; obtaining a second nucleic acid encoding a second protein; and ligating the first and second nucleic acids. The resulting nucleic acid may be inserted into an expression vector, or may already be part of an expression vector.

To improve solubility, purification of hybrid proteins may involve the refolding techniques disclosed herein.

Immunogenic Compositions and Medicaments

The compositions of the invention are preferably immunogenic composition, and are more preferably vaccine compositions. The pH of the composition is preferably between 6 and 7. The pH may be maintained by the use of a buffer. The composition may be sterile.

Vaccines according to the invention may either be prophylactic (i.e. to prevent infection) or therapeutic (i.e. to treat infection), but will typically be prophylactic.

The invention also provides a composition of the invention for use as a medicament. The medicament is preferably able to raise an immune response in a mammal (i.e. it is an immunogenic composition) and is more preferably a vaccine.

The invention also provides the use of a composition of the invention in the manufacture of a medicament for raising an immune response in a mammal. The medicament is preferably a vaccine.

The invention also provides a method for raising an immune response in a mammal comprising the step of administering an effective amount of a composition of the invention. The immune response is preferably protective. The method may raise a booster response.

The mammal is preferably a human. Where the vaccine is for prophylactic use, the human is preferably a child (e.g. a toddler or infant); where the vaccine is for prophylactic use, the human is preferably an adult. A vaccine intended for children may also be administered to adults e.g. to assess safety, dosage, immunogenicity, etc.

These uses and methods are preferably for the prevention and/or treatment of a disease caused by a Neisseria (e.g. meningitis, septicaemia, gonorrhoea etc.). The prevention and/or treatment of bacterial meningitis is preferred.

Further Components of the Composition

The composition of the invention will typically, in addition to the components mentioned above, comprise one or more ‘pharmaceutically acceptable carriers’, which include any carrier that does not itself induce the production of antibodies harmful to the individual receiving the composition. Suitable carriers are typically large, slowly metabolised macromolecules such as proteins, polysaccharides, polylactic acids, polyglycolic acids, polymeric amino acids, amino acid copolymers, trehalose (WO00/56365) and lipid aggregates (such as oil droplets or liposomes). Such carriers are well known to those of ordinary skill in the art. The vaccines may also contain diluents, such as water, saline, glycerol, etc. Additionally, auxiliary substances, such as wetting or emulsifying agents, pH buffering substances, and the like, may be present. A thorough discussion of pharmaceutically acceptable excipients is available in Remington's Pharmaceutical Sciences.

Immunogenic compositions used as vaccines comprise an immunologically effective amount of antigen, as well as any other of the above-mentioned components, as needed. By ‘immunologically effective amount’, it is meant that the administration of that amount to an individual, either in a single dose or as part of a series, is effective for treatment or prevention. This amount varies depending upon the health and physical condition of the individual to be treated, age, the taxonomic group of individual to be treated (e.g. non-human primate, primate, etc.), the capacity of the individual's immune system to synthesise antibodies, the degree of protection desired, the formulation of the vaccine, the treating doctor's assessment of the medical situation, and other relevant factors. It is expected that the amount will fall in a relatively broad range that can be determined through routine trials. Dosage treatment may be a single dose schedule or a multiple dose schedule (e.g. including booster doses). The vaccine may be administered in conjunction with other immunoregulatory agents.

The vaccine may be administered in conjunction with other immunoregulatory agents.

The composition may include other adjuvants in addition to (or in place of) the aluminium salt. Preferred adjuvants to enhance effectiveness of the composition include, but are not limited to: (1) oil-in-water emulsion formulations (with or without other specific immunostimulating agents such as muramyl peptides (see below) or bacterial cell wall components), such as for example (a) MF59™ (WO90/14837; Chapter 10 in ref. 13), containing 5% Squalene, 0.5% Tween 80, and 0.5% Span 85 (optionally containing MTP-PE) formulated into submicron particles using a microfluidizer, (b) SAF, containing 10% Squalane, 0.4% Tween 80, 5% pluronic-blocked polymer L121, and thr-MDP either microfluidized into a submicron emulsion or vortexed to generate a larger particle size emulsion, and (c) Ribi™ adjuvant system (RAS), (Ribi Immunochem, Hamilton, Mont.) containing 2% Squalene, 0.2% Tween 80, and one or more bacterial cell wall components from the group consisting of monophosphorylipid A (MPL), trehalose dimycolate (TDM), and cell wall skeleton (CWS), preferably MPL+CWS (Detox™); (2) saponin adjuvants, such as QS21 or Stimulon™ (Cambridge Bioscience, Worcester, Mass.) may be used or particles generated therefrom such as ISCOMs (immunostimulating complexes), which ISCOMS may be devoid of additional detergent e.g. WO00/07621; (3) Complete Freund's Adjuvant (CFA) and Incomplete Freund's Adjuvant (IFA); (4) cytokines, such as interleukins (e.g. IL-1, IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-7, IL-12 (WO99/44636), etc.), interferons (e.g. gamma interferon), macrophage colony stimulating factor (M-CSF), tumor necrosis factor (TNF), etc.; (5) monophosphoryl lipid A (MPL) or 3-O-deacylated MPL (3dMPL) e.g. GB-2220221, EP-A-0689454; (6) combinations of 3dMPL with, for example, QS21 and/or oil-in-water emulsions e.g. EP-A-0835318, EP-A-0735898, EP-A-0761231; (7) oligonucleotides comprising CpG motifs [Krieg Vaccine 2000, 19, 618-622; Krieg Curr opin Mol Ther 2001 3:15-24; Roman et al., Nat. Med., 1997, 3, 849-854; Weiner et al., PNAS USA, 1997, 94, 10833-10837; Davis et al., J. Immunol., 1998, 160, 870-876; Chu et al., J. Exp. Med., 1997, 186, 1623-1631; Lipford et al., Eur. J. Immunol., 1997, 27, 2340-2344; Moldoveanu et al., Vaccine, 1988, 16, 1216-1224, Krieg et al., Nature, 1995, 374, 546-549; Klinman et al., PNAS USA, 1996, 93, 2879-2883; Ballas et al., J. Immunol., 1996, 157, 1840-1845; Cowdery et al., J. Immunol., 1996, 156, 4570-4575; Halpern et al., Cell. Immunol., 1996, 167, 72-78; Yamamoto et al., Jpn. J. Cancer Res., 1988, 79, 866-873; Stacey et al., J. Immunol., 1996, 157, 2116-2122; Messina et al., J. Immunol., 1991, 147, 1759-1764; Yi et al., J. Immunol., 1996, 157, 4918-4925; Yi et al., J. Immunol., 1996, 157, 5394-5402; Yi et al., J. Immunol., 1998, 160, 4755-4761; and Yi et al., J. Immunol., 1998, 160, 5898-5906; International patent applications WO96/02555, WO98/16247, WO98/18810, WO98/40100, WO98/55495, WO98/37919 and WO98/52581] i.e. containing at least one CG dinucleotide, with 5-methylcytosine optionally being used in place of cytosine; (8) a polyoxyethylene ether or a polyoxyethylene ester e.g. WO99/52549; (9) a polyoxyethylene sorbitan ester surfactant in combination with an octoxynol (e.g. WO01/21207) or a polyoxyethylene alkyl ether or ester surfactant in combination with at least one additional non-ionic surfactant such as an octoxynol (e.g. WO01/21152); (10) an immunostimulatory oligonucleotide (e.g. a CpG oligonucleotide) and a saponin e.g. WO00/62800; (11) an immunostimulant and a particle of metal salt e.g. WO00/23105; (12) a saponin and an oil-in-water emulsion e.g. WO99/11241; (13) a saponin (e.g. QS21)+3dMPL+IL-12 (optionally+a sterol) e.g. WO98/57659; (14) other substances that act as immunostimulating agents to enhance the efficacy of the composition.

Muramyl peptides include N-acetyl-muramyl-L-threonyl-D-isoglutamine (thr-MDP), N-acetyl-normuramyl-L-alanyl-D-isoglutamine (nor-MDP), N-acetylmuramyl-L-alanyl-D-isoglutaminyl-L-alanine-2-(1′-2′-dipalmitoyl-sn-glycero-3-hydroxyphosphoryloxy)-ethylamine MTP-PE), etc.

Further Antigens

Further antigens which can be included in the composition of the invention include:

    • an outer-membrane vesicle (OMV) preparation from N. meningitidis serogroup B, such as those disclosed in refs. 14, 15, 16, 17 etc.
    • a saccharide antigen from N. meningitidis serogroup A, C, W135 and/or Y, such as the oligosaccharide disclosed in ref. 18 from serogroup C [see also ref. 19] or the oligosaccharides of ref. 20.
    • a saccharide antigen from Streptococcus pneumoniae [e.g. refs. 21, 22, 23].
    • a protein antigen from Helicobacter pylori such as CagA [e.g. 24], VacA [e.g. 24], NAP [e.g. 25], HopX [e.g. 26], HopY [e.g. 26] and/or urease.
    • an antigen from hepatitis A virus, such as inactivated virus [e.g. 27, 28].
    • an antigen from hepatitis B virus, such as the surface and/or core antigens [e.g. 28, 29].
    • an antigen from hepatitis C virus [e.g. 30].
    • an antigen from Bordetella pertussis, such as pertussis holotoxin (PT) and filamentous haemagglutinin (FHA) from B. pertussis, optionally also in combination with pertactin and/or agglutinogens 2 and 3 [e.g. refs. 31 & 32].
    • a diphtheria antigen, such as a diphtheria toxoid [e.g. chapter 3 of ref. 33] e.g. the CRM197 mutant [e.g. 34].
    • a tetanus antigen, such as a tetanus toxoid [e.g. chapter 4 of ref. 33].
    • a saccharide antigen from Haemophilus influenzae B [e.g. 19].
    • an antigen from N. gonorrhoeae [e.g. 3, 4, 5].
    • an antigen from Chlamydia pneumoniae [e.g. 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41].
    • an antigen from Chlamydia trachomatis [e.g. 42].
    • an antigen from Porphyromonas gingivalis [e.g. 43].
    • polio antigen(s) [e.g. 44, 45] such as IPV or OPV.
    • rabies antigen(s) [e.g. 46] such as lyophilised inactivated virus [e.g. 47, RabAvert™].
    • measles, mumps and/or rubella antigens [e.g. chapters 9, 10 & 11 of ref. 33].
    • influenza antigen(s) [e.g. chapter 19 of ref. 33], such as the haemagglutinin and/or neuraminidase surface proteins.
    • an antigen from Moraxella catarrhalis [e.g. 48].
    • a protein antigen from Streptococcus agalactiae (group B streptococcus) [e.g. 49, 50].
    • a saccharide antigen from Streptococcus agalactiae
    • an antigen from Streptococcus pyogenes (group A streptococcus) [e.g. 50, 51, 52].
    • an antigen from Staphylococcus aureus [e.g. 53].

The composition may comprise one or more of these further antigens.

Where a saccharide or carbohydrate antigen is used, it is preferably conjugated to a carrier protein in order to enhance immunogenicity [e.g. refs. 54 to 63]. Preferred carrier proteins are bacterial toxins or toxoids, such as diphtheria or tetanus toxoids. The CRM197 diphtheria toxoid is particularly preferred. Other suitable carrier proteins include the N. meningitidis outer membrane protein [e.g. ref. 64], synthetic peptides [e.g. 65, 66], heat shock proteins [e.g. 67], pertussis proteins [e.g. 68, 69], protein D from H. influenzae [e.g. 70], toxin A or B from C. difficile [e.g. 71], etc. Where a mixture comprises capsular saccharides from both serogroups A and C, it is preferred that the ratio (w/w) of MenA saccharide:MenC saccharide is greater than 1 (e.g. 2:1, 3:1, 4:1, 5:1, 10:1 or higher). Saccharides from different serogroups of N. meningitidis may be conjugated to the same or different carrier proteins.

Any suitable conjugation reaction can be used, with any suitable linker where necessary.

Toxic protein antigens may be detoxified where necessary (e.g. detoxification of pertussis toxin by chemical and/or genetic means [32]).

Where a diphtheria antigen is included in the composition it is preferred also to include tetanus antigen and pertussis antigens. Similarly, where a tetanus antigen is included it is preferred also to include diphtheria and pertussis antigens. Similarly, where a pertussis antigen is included it is preferred also to include diphtheria and tetanus antigens.

Antigens are preferably mixed with (and more preferably adsorbed to) an aluminium salt (e.g. phosphate, hydroxide, hydroxyphosphate, oxyhydroxide, orthophosphate, sulphate). The salt may take any suitable form (e.g. gel, crystalline, amorphous etc.).

Antigens in the composition will typically be present at a concentration of at least 1 μg/ml each. In general, the concentration of any given antigen will be sufficient to elicit an immune response against that antigen.

As an alternative to using proteins antigens in the composition of the invention, nucleic acid encoding the antigen may be used [e.g. refs. 72 to 80]. Protein components of the compositions of the invention may thus be replaced by nucleic acid (preferably DNA e.g. in the form of a plasmid) that encodes the protein.

DEFINITIONS

The term “comprising” means “including” as well as “consisting” e.g. a composition “comprising” X may consist exclusively of X or may include something additional e.g. X+Y.

The term “about” in relation to a numerical value x means, for example, x±10%.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 shows an alignment of twenty-three sequences for protein 741. These are SEQ IDs 1 to 22 plus the sequence from MC58.

FIG. 2 shows an alignment of the NMB1343 sequence from gonococcus (top; SEQ ID 25) and meningococcus (bottom; SEQ ID 26).

FIG. 3 shows hybrid and tandem proteins of the invention.

FIG. 4 shows 9 domains within 9612996, and FIG. 5 shows how these have been manipulated.

MODES FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION

Hybrid Proteins—X1=ΔG287

In addition to those disclosed in references 1 & 2, seven hybrid proteins with ΔG287 from strain 2996 at the N-terminus were constructed. Eight 287 tandem proteins were also made (see below).

# n X1 L1 X2 L2 1 2 ΔG287 230 (His)6 2 2 936 (His)6 3 2 741MC58 (His)6 4 2 741ET37 (His)6 5 2 74190/18311 (His)6 6 2 74195N477 (His)6 7 2 ΔG287nz 741MC58 (His)6

These proteins were adjuvanted with either Freund's complete adjuvant (FCA) or 3 mg/ml alum and used to immunise mice. The resulting sera were tested against various Neisserial strains using the bactericidal assay. Titres using protein #3 were as follows:

Strain(serogroup) 2996(B) MC58(B) NGH38(B) 394/98(B) 44/76(B) F6124(A) Al hydroxide 8192 32768 8192 >2048 16384 8192 FCA 16384 262144 8192 >2048 >32768 8192

In further experiments using protein #3 adjuvanted with aluminium hydroxide, anti-287 and anti-741 ELISA titres each exceeded 984150 and BCA titres were as follows:

2996(B) MC58(B) NGH38(B) 394/98(B) 44/76(B) F6124(A) BZ133(C) 8000 65000 4000 4000 32000 8000 16000

Results obtained after immunisation with proteins disclosed in refs. 1 & 2, tested against the homologous strain, were as follows:

Bactericidal titre ELISA n X1 L1 X2 L2 FCA Alum FCA Alum 2 ΔG287394/98 961 (His)6 32768 >109350 919 32768 4096 4718 3678 953 >32768 >16384 1900 6932 741 16384 2048 232 862 2 ΔG2872996 961 (His)6 65536 32768 108627 >109350 919 128000 32000 11851 2581 953 65536 3834 741 16384 8192 315 4645

Hybrid Proteins—X1=961c or 961cL

In addition to those disclosed in references 1 & 2, eight hybrid proteins with either 961c or 961cL (i.e. 961c+leader peptide) at the N-terminus were constructed:

# n X1 L1 X2 L2 1 2 961c 287 2 2 287 (His)6 3 2 230 (His)6 4 2 936 (His)6 5 2 961cL 287 6 2 287 (His)6 7 2 230 (His)6 8 2 936 (His)6

These proteins were adjuvanted with either Freund's complete adjuvant (FCA) or 3.3 mg/ml alum and used to immunise mice. The resulting sera were tested against various Neisserial strains using the bactericidal assay. Titres using protein #8 were as follows:

Strain(serogroup) 2996(B) MC58(B) 394/98(B) 44/76(B) F6124(A) Al hydroxide 8192 8192 512 1024 <16 FCA 65536 16384 >2048 >2048 8192

Titres obtained after immunisation with 961c-741 [refs. 1 & 2] were as follows:

Strain(serogroup) 2996(B) MC58(B) 394/98(B) 44/76(B) F6124(A) BZ133(C) Al hydroxide 65536 32768 4096 >32768 16384 >2048 FCA >16384 262144 4096 >16384 >2048

These results could be improved by mixing 961c-741 with ORF46.1 or with ΔG287-919.

Results obtained after immunisation with proteins disclosed in refs. 1 & 2, tested against the homologous strain, were as follows:

Bactericidal titre ELISA n X1 L1 X2 L2 FCA Alum FCA Alum 2 961c ORF46.1 (His)6 32768 1024 >109350 >109350 741 >16384 8192 >109350 >109350 936 >32768 8192 >109350 >109350

Hybrid proteins —X1=ORF46.1

In addition to those disclosed in references 1 & 2, two hybrid proteins with ORF46.1 at the N-terminus were constructed:

# n X1 L1 X2 L2 1 2 ORF46.1 936 (His)6 2 2 230 (His)6

These proteins were adjuvanted with either Freund's complete adjuvant (FCA) or 3 mg/ml alum and used to immunise mice. The resulting sera were tested against the homologous strain using the bactericidal assay and by ELISA.

Results obtained after immunisation with proteins disclosed in refs. 1 & 2 were as follows:

Bactericidal titre ELISA n X1 L1 X2 L2 FCA Alum FCA Alum 2 ORF46.1 961 (His)6 8192 8192 21558 >109350 961c (His)6 8192 128 9020 76545

Hybrid Proteins—X1=230

In addition to those disclosed in references 1 & 2, four hybrid proteins with 230 at the N-terminus were constructed:

# n X1 L1 X2 L2 1 2 230 ORF46.1 (His)6 2 2 961 (His)6 3 2 961c (His)6 4 2 741MC58 (His)6

Hybrid Proteins—X1=936

In addition to those disclosed in references 1 & 2, seven hybrid proteins with 936 at the N-terminus were constructed:

# n X1 L1 X2 L2 1 2 936 ORF46.1 (His)6 2 2 961 (His)6 3 2 741ET37 (His)6 4 2 741MC58 (His)6 5 2 74190/18311 (His)6 6 2 74195N477 (His)6 7 2 741 (His)6

These proteins were adjuvanted with either Freund's complete adjuvant (FCA) or 3 mg/ml alum and used to immunise mice. The resulting sera were tested against various Neisserial strains using the bactericidal assay. Titres using protein #2 were as follows:

Strain(serogroup) 2996(B) MC58(B) 394/98(B) 44/76(B) F6124(A) Al hydroxide 16384 32768 1024 2048 <16  FCA 65536 65536 >2048 8192 2048(36%)

Titres using protein #4 were as follows:

Strain(serogroup) 2996(B) MC58(B) 394/98(B) 44/76(B) F6124(A) Al hydroxide 256 >262144 >2048 32768 8192 FCA 1024 >262144 >2048 >32768 >32768

Titres using protein #7 were as follows:

Strain (serogroup) 2996 (B) MC58 (B) 394/98 (B) 44/76 (B) F6124 (A) BZ133 (C) Al hydroxide 256 130000 16000 32000 8000 16000

Results obtained after immunisation with proteins disclosed in refs. 1 & 2, tested against the homologous strain, were as follows:

Bactericidal titre ELISA n X1 L1 X2 L2 FCA Alum FCA Alum 2 936 741 (His)6 1024 256 1466 5715 936 >32768 >32768 >109350 >109350

Mixtures of Hybrid Proteins

Mice were immunised with of three proteins adjuvanted with aluminium hydroxide, either single or in a triple combination: (1) 287NZ-953; (2) 936-741; and (3) 961c. The mixture was able to induce high bactericidal titres against various strains:

2996 (B) MC58 (B) NGH38 394/98 (B) H44/76 (B) F6124 (A) BZ133 (C) C11 (C) (1) 32000 16000 130000 16000 32000 8000 16000 8000 (2) 256 131000 128 16000 32000 8000 16000 <4 (3) 32000 8000 8000 32000 mix 32000 32000 65000 16000 260000 65000 >65000 8000 (X) 4000 4000 1000 1000 >4000 1000 4000 n.d. ‘—’ indicates that this strain contains no NadA gene (X) was a combination of protein 287 with outer membrane vesicles, for comparison

Looking at individual mice, the mixture induced high and consistent bactericidal titres:

# 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 2996 32768 16384 65536 32768 32768 65536 65536 32768 65536 8192 MC58 65536 32768 65536 65536 65536 8192 65536 32768 32768 65536 394/98 65536 4096 16384 4096 8192 4096 32768 16384 8192 16384

Tandem Proteins

Hybrid proteins of the invention can be represented by formula NH2—[—X-L-]n-COOH. Where all n instances of —X— are the same basic protein (either identical, or the same protein from different strains or species), the protein is referred to as a ‘tandem’ protein.

Twelve specific tandem proteins are:

# n X1 L1 X2 L2 1 2 ΔG741MC58 741MC58 (His)6 2 2 ΔG2872996 (Gly)6 ΔG287394/98 (His)6 3 2 ΔG2872996 (Gly)6 ΔG2872996 (His)6 4 2 ΔG287394/98 (Gly)6 ΔG287394/98 (His)6 5 2 ΔG287394/98 (Gly)6 ΔG2872996 (His)6 6 2 ΔG2872996 (Gly)6 ΔG287394/98 7 2 ΔG2872996 (Gly)6 ΔG2872996 8 2 ΔG287394/98 (Gly)6 ΔG287394/98 9 2 ΔG287394/98 (Gly)6 ΔG2872996 10 2 ΔG741MC58 741394/98 (His)6 11 2 ΔG741MC58 74190/18311 (His)6 12 2 ΔG741MC58 74195N477 (His)6

Proteins #1 to #5 have all been expressed in soluble form in E. coli. Expression levels were between 0.24 and 0.50 mg protein per liter of culture. The tandem proteins were purified and mixed with aluminium phosphate as an adjuvant. Tandem proteins #2, #4 and #5 adsorbed readily to aluminium phosphate; adsorption was less complete for tandem proteins #1 and #3.

Allelic Variants—741

Twenty-two polymorphic sequences of 741 were found (SEQ IDs 1 to 22). These and the MC58 sequence are aligned in FIG. 1.

Allelic Variants—NMB1343

Using PCR on 42 strains of meningococcus of various serogroups, the gene encoding NMB1343 protein was found in 24/42 and was absent in 18/42 strains (Table 1). The NMB1343 gene was sequenced for 10 of the NMB1343+ strains (Table 1, column 3). The nucleic acid sequence (and thus amino acid sequence SEQ ID 23; GenBank AAF41718) was identical in all 10 strains.

NMB1343 was also detected in two strains of N. gonorrhoeae (F62 and SN4). The amino acid sequence from gonococcus is SEQ ID 24. An alignment with the meningococcal sequence is:

An alignment of the corresponding nucleotide sequences is shown in FIG. 2. This shows that the gonococcal sequence has a 4mer insertion in the 5′ region of the NMB 1343 gene which causes a frameshift and consequent loss of the 5′ methionine residue.

Domain Deletion—961

961 is not present in the N. meningitidis serogroup A genome sequence [81], even though the surrounding regions are conserved (>90%) between serogroups A and B. References 11 and 12 disclose polymorphic forms of 961. The gene was found to be present in 91% of serogroup B strains belonging to hypervirulent lineages ET-5, ET-37 and cluster A4, but was absent in all strains of lineage 3 tested. Most of the serogroup C strains tested were positive even if not belonging to hypervirulent lineages. The same was true for the serogroup B strains with serotype 2a and 2b. For serogroup A, one strain belonging to subgroup III was positive whereas the other two strains belonging to subgroup IV-1 were negative. 961 was absent in N. gonorrhoeae and in commensal species N. lactamica and N. cinerea.

FIGS. 4 and 5 show domains in protein 961.

When the anchor region (domain 9) of protein 961 is deleted (‘961cL’) and expressed in E. coli, the protein is exported in the periplasm and secreted in the supernatant of the culture.

To investigate this further, deletion mutants in the C-terminal region of 961 were constructed (961cL-Δaro, 961cLΔcc, 961aL, 961aL-Δ1, 961aL-Δ2, 961aL-Δ3) on the basis of structural features (deletions of aromatic residues in the cases of 961cΔaro mutant, and of coiled-coil regions for the others). These were analysed for expression and secretion into the periplasm and the supernatant of the culture. In all of these deletion mutants, the protein is produced in large amount, is present in periplasmic fraction, and is released in the supernatant of the culture.

ΔG287—Cross-Strain Bactericidal Activity

287 was cloned for five different N. meningitidis serogroup B strains and was manipulated to delete the N-terminus up to the end of the poly-glycine region and to introduce a C-terminal his-tag. This gave five ΔG287 proteins. These were adjuvanted with FCA and used to raise immune sera in mice, which were then tested for bactericidal activity against all five serogroup B strains and also against serogroup A and C strains. Bactericidal titres were as follows:

Protein Sera tested for bactericidal activity against strain * strain 2996 BZ232 MC58 1000 394/98 F6124 BZ133 2996 16000 128 4096 4096 1024 8000 16000 BZ232 >8000 256 2048 8000 2048 16000 8000 MC58 >8000 64 >8000 8000 2048 8000 8000 1000 >8000 64 4096 8000 1024 16000 16000 394/98 >16000 128 16000 >2048 >16000 * titres against homologous strain shown in bold

Refolding

To improve the levels of soluble protein for some hybrid proteins, alternative refolding protocols to those disclosed in reference 2 were adopted.

Inclusion bodies (IBs) were isolated as follows:

    • 1. Homogenize cells (5 g wet weight) in 25 ml 0.1 M Tris-HCl pH 7, 1 mM EDTA, at 4° C. using an ultraturrax (10 000 rpm)
    • 2. Add 1.5 mg lysozyme per gram cells, mix shortly with an ultraturrax, and incubate at 4° C. for 30 min.
    • 3. Use sonication or high-pressure homogenization (French press) to disrupt the cells.
    • 4. To digest DNA, add MgCl2 to a final concentration of 3 mM and DNase to a final concentration of 10 μg/ml, and incubate for 30 min at 25° C.
    • 5. Add 0.5 vol. 60 mM EDTA, 6% Triton X-100, 1.5M NaCl pH7, to the solution, and incubate for 30 min at 4° C.
    • 6. Spin down inclusion bodies by centrifugation at 31000 g (20 000 rpm) for 10 min, 4° C.
    • 7. Resuspend pellet in 40 ml 0.1 M tris-HCl pH 7, 20 mM EDTA, using an ultraturrax
    • 8. Repeat centrifugation step 6.
    • 9. The inclusion body pellet may be used, or stored frozen at −20° C.

Hybrid proteins were expressed in E. coli as follows:

Culture Flask Inclusion volume volume Temp Final body yield Protein (litres) (litres) (° C.) OD600 (w/w) ORF46.1-961-His 1 2 37 1.51 33.2% ORF46.1-961c-His 1 2 37 1.6 28.3% 961c-ORF46.1His 1 2 37 1.18 23.5% orf46.1-741 His 5 5 37 12.42 35.2

The pellets were solubilised, refolded, ultrafiltered, dialysed, and protein was then purified:

ORF46.1-961-His IBs were solubilised as follows: IB proteins were resuspended in 4 ml of 6M guanidine HCl, 1 mM EDTA pH 8.5 buffer, to a final protein concentration of 1 mg/ml. To refold the protein, 2 ml of solubilised protein was diluted in 400 ml of refolding buffer (0.1M Tris HCl, 1M L-arginine, 2 mM EDTA pH 8.2) and incubated for 1 hour at 15° C., resulting in a protein concentration of 5 μg/ml. Subsequently, another 2 ml of the solubilised protein was added and incubated for an additional hour at the same temperature resulting in a final protein concentration of 10 μg/ml. The material was ultrafiltered using a 300 ml Amicon ultrafiltration cell (8400), applying a 3 bar pressure on an Amicon membrane with a 30 kDa cut-off (YM30) resulting in 130 ml final volume. The ultrafiltered material was dialysed using a regenerated cellulose tubular membrane with a 12-14 kDa cutoff (Cellusep—Step bio) for 24 hours against 10 L of 0.1M Tris HCl pH 8.2 buffer. A second dialysis of 24 h against 10 L of 300 mM NaCl, 50 mM sodium phosphate pH 8.0 buffer was performed. The dialysed material was centrifuged at 22000 rpm for 45 minutes at 4° C. in a Beckman centrifuge rotor JA25.5 The supernatant isolated after centrifugation was used for His-tag purification.

orf 46.1-961c-His IBs were solubilised as follows: IB proteins were resuspended in 4 ml of 6M guanidine HCl, 1 mM EDTA pH 8.5 buffer, to a final protein concentration of 1 mg/ml. To refold the protein, 2 ml of the solubilised protein was diluted in 400 ml refolding buffer (0.5M Tris HCl, 1M L-arginine, 2 mM EDTA pH 8.2) and incubated for 1 h at 15° C., resulting in a protein concentration of 5 μg/ml. Subsequently another 2 ml of the solubilised protein was added and incubated for an additional hour at the same temperature resulting in a final protein concentration of 10 μg/ml. The material was ultrafiltered using a 300 ml Amicon ultrafiltration cell (8400), applying a 3 bar pressure on an Amicon membrane with a 30 kDa cut-off (YM30) resulting in 150 ml final volume. The ultrafiltered material was dialysed using a regenerated cellulose tubular membrane with a 12-14 kDa cutoff (Cellusep—Step bio) for 24 h against 10 L of 0.1M Tris HCl pH 8.2 buffer. A second dialysis of 24 h against 10 L of 300 mM NaCl, 50 mM sodium phosphate pH 8.0 buffer was performed. The dialysed material was centrifuged at 22000 rpm for 45 minutes at 4° C. in a Beckman centrifuge rotor JA25.5. The supernatant isolated after centrifugation was used for His-tag purification.

961c-orf46.1-His IBs were solubilised as follows: IB proteins were resuspended in 4 ml of 6M guanidine HCl, 1 mM EDTA pH 8.5 buffer, to a final protein concentration of 1 mg/ml. To refold the protein, 2 ml of the solubilised protein was diluted in 400 ml refolding buffer (0.1M Tris HCl, 0.5 M L-arginine, 2 mM EDTA pH 8.2) and incubated for 1 h at 15° C., resulting in a protein concentration of 5 μg/ml. Subsequently another 2 ml of the solubilized protein was added and incubated for an additional hour at the same temperature resulting in a final protein concentration of 10 μg/ml. The material was ultrafiltered using a 300 ml Amicon ultrafiltration cell (8400), applying a 3 bar pressure on an Amicon membrane with a 30 kDa cut-off (YM30) resulting in 150 ml final volume. The ultrafiltered material was dialysed using a regenerated cellulose tubular membrane with a 12-14 kDa cutoff (Cellusep—Step bio) for 24 h against 10 L of 0.1M Tris HCl pH 8.2 buffer. A second dialysis of 24 h against 10 L of 300 mM NaCl, 50 mM sodium phosphate pH 8.0 buffer was performed. The dialysed material was centrifuged at 22000 rpm for 45 minutes at 4° C. in a Beckman centrifuge rotor JA25.5. The supernatant isolated after centrifugation was used for His-tag purification.

orf46.1-741-His IBs were solubilised as follows: IB proteins were resuspended in 4 ml of 6M guanidine HCl, 1 mM EDTA pH 8.5 buffer, to a final protein concentration of 10 mg/ml. To refold, 2 ml of the solubilised protein was diluted in 400 ml of the refolding buffer (0.5M Tris HCl, 0.7 M L-arginine, 2 mM EDTA pH 7.2) and incubated for 1 h at 15° C., resulting in a protein concentration of 50 μg/ml. Subsequently another 2 ml of the solubilised protein was added and incubated for an additional hour at the same temperature resulting in a final protein concentration of 100 μg/ml. The material was ultrafiltered using a 300 ml Amicon ultrafiltration cell (8400), applying a 3 bar pressure on an Amicon membrane with a 30 kDa cut-off (YM30) resulting in 120 ml final volume. The ultrafiltered material was dialysed using a regenerated cellulose tubular membrane with a 12-14 kDa cutoff (Cellusep—Step bio) for 24 h against 10 L of 0.1M Tris HCl pH 8.2 buffer. A second dialysis of 24 h against 10 L of 300 mM NaCl, 50 mM sodium phosphate pH 8.0 buffer was performed. The dialysed material was centrifuged at 22000 rpm for 45 minutes at 4° C. in a Beckman centrifuge rotor JA25.5 The supernatant isolated after centrifugation was used for His-tag purification.

Compared with proteins purified as described in ref. 2, bactericidal assay titres were as follows:

Reference 2 Refolded Alumin- Alumin- Alumin- ium hy- ium hy- ium phos- Protein CFA droxide droxide MF59 phate ORF46.1-961-His 8192 8192 32768 ORF46.1-961c-His 8192 128 <64 8192 961c-ORF46.1His 32768 1024 16384 orf46.1-741 His <4 16 <4  256

Similar procedures were used for ORF46.1 to purify the protein from IBs when expressed with no His-tag (‘ORF46.1K’):

Culture Flask Inclusion volume volume Temp Final body yield Protein (litres) (litres) (° C.) OD600 (w/w) orf46.1K 5 5 37 13.7 29.4

IB proteins were resuspended in 4 ml of 6M guanidine HCl, 1 mM EDTA pH 8.5 buffer, to a final protein concentration of 10 mg/ml. To refold, 2 ml of the solubilised protein was diluted in 400 ml of the refolding buffer (0.5M Tris HCl, 0.7 M L-arginine, 2 mM EDTA pH 7.2) and incubated for 1 hours at 15° C., resulting in a protein concentration of 50 μg/ml. Subsequently another 2 ml of the solubilised protein was added and incubated for an additional hour at the same temperature resulting in a final protein concentration of 100 μg/ml. The material was ultrafiltered using a 300 ml Amicon ultrafiltration cell (8400), applying a 3 bar pressure on an Amicon membrane with a 30 kDa cut-off (YM30) resulting in 120 ml final volume. The ultrafiltered material was dialysed using a regenerated cellulose tubular membrane with a 12-14 kDa cutoff (Cellusep—Step bio) for 12 h against 10 L of 50 mM sodium phosphate, 2 mM EDTA, pH 7.2 buffer. A second dialysis of 24 h against 10 L of the same buffer was performed. The dialysed material was centrifuged at 22000 rpm for 45 minutes at 4° C. in a Beckman centrifuge rotor JA25.5. The supernatant isolated after centrifugation was used for cationic exchange chromatography. The purification was done on a AKTA explorer chromatography system (Amersham-Pharmacia Biotech) using a 5 ml HiTrap SP sepharose HP column (Amersham-Pharmacia Biotech). The flow rate applied was of 1.5 ml per minute. The column was washed with 35 ml of 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer pH 7.2. A linear gradient (0-1 M NaCl) was performed using a 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer pH 7.2. The protein eluted in two peaks at 92 mM and 380 mM NaCl. The fractions constituting each peak were pooled and respectively named pool 1 and pool 2.

Compared with proteins purified as described in ref. 2, bactericidal assay titres when adjuvanted with aluminium hydroxide were improved from <4 to 1024. The titre using aluminium phosphate adjuvant with the refolded protein was 2048. ELISA titres were as follows:

Elisa SBA Protein Aluminium adjuvant (M7) (2996) Orf46.1k (pool 1) Hydroxide 3.3 mg/ml 1212 512 Phosphate 0.6 mg/ml 154 1024 Orf46.1k (pool 2) Hydroxide 3.3 mg/ml 1085 1024 Phosphate 0.6 mg/ml 250 1024

It will be understood that the invention has been described by way of example only and modifications may be made whilst remaining within the scope and spirit of the invention.

TABLE 1 Strain 1343 Sequence Strain classification 72/00 + ET5 B:15:P1.7,13,13a 30/00 + ET5 B:15:P1.7,16 39/99 + ET5 C:15:P1.7,16 95330 + ET5 B:4:P1.15 M4102 + ET5 nd MC58(21) + + ET5 B:15:P1.7,16b BZ169(7) + + ET5 B:NT:P1.16 BZ83(19) + ET5 B:15:—.— CU385 + + ET5 B:4:P1.15 220173I + ET5 NG:4:P1.15 64/96 + + ET5 NG:15:P1.7,16 (carrier) 220173I + ET5 B:4:P1.15 (carrier) ISS1071 + nd B:15:P1.7,16 (ET5?) BZ198(2) + + lin.3 B:8:P1.1 980-2543 + + lin.3 B:NT:P1.4 16060 + + other B:4:P1.14 (carrier) 394-98 + nd B:4:P1.4 (lin 3?) ISS1106 + nd B:4:P1.4 (lin.3?) BZ133(10) + + sub I B:NT:—.— S3446 + + nd B:14:P1.23,14 ISS1001 + + nd B:14:P1.13 241175I + other NG:21:P1.16 (carrier) 171274I + other NG:15:— (carrier) 66/96 + other B:17:P1.15 (carrier) 961-5945 A4 96217 A4 312294 A4 90/18311(24) ET37 93/4286(25) ET37 M986 ET37 1000(5) other NGE28(13) other carrier NGH38(14) other carrier BZ232(18) other F6124(23) sub III A:—.— C11 C:— NMB nd 8047 nd ISS759 nd C:2b:P1.2 ISS1113 nd C:2:P1.5 65/96 nd 4:P1.14 2996(96) nd B:2b:P1.5,2

REFERENCES The Contents of which are Hereby Incorporated by Reference

  • 1—International patent application WO01/64920.
  • 2—International patent application WO01/64922.
  • 3—International patent application WO99/24578.
  • 4—International patent application WO99/36544.
  • 5—International patent application WO99/57280.
  • 6—International patent application WO00/22430.
  • 7—Tettelin et al. (2000) Science 287:1809-1815.
  • 8—International patent application WO00/66741.
  • 9—International patent application WO00/71574.
  • 10—International patent application WO01/04316
  • 11—International patent application PCT/IB02/03396.
  • 12—Comanducci et al. (2002) J Exp Med 195:1445-1454.
  • 13—Vaccine Design: subunit & adjuvant approach (1995) Powell & Newman (ISBN: 030644867X).
  • 14—International patent application WO01/52885.
  • 15—Bjune et al. (1991) Lancet 338(8775):1093-1096.
  • 16—Fukasawa et al. (1999) Vaccine 17:2951-2958.
  • 17—Rosenqvist et al. (1998) Dev. Biol. Stand. 92:323-333.
  • 18—Costantino et al. (1992) Vaccine 10:691-698.
  • 19—Costantino et al. (1999) Vaccine 17:1251-1263.
  • 20—International patent application PCT/IB02/03191.
  • 21—Watson (2000) Pediatr Infect Dis J 19:331-332.
  • 22—Rubin (2000) Pediatr Clin North Am 47:269-285, v.
  • 23—Jedrzejas (2001) Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 65:187-207.
  • 24—International patent application WO93/18150.
  • 25—International patent application WO99/53310.
  • 26—International patent application WO98/04702.
  • 27—Bell (2000) Pediatr Infect Dis J 19:1187-1188.
  • 28—Iwarson (1995) APMIS 103:321-326.
  • 29—Gerlich et al. (1990) Vaccine 8 Suppl:S63-68 & 79-80.
  • 30—Hsu et al. (1999) Clin Liver Dis 3:901-915.
  • 31—Gustafsson et al. (1996) N. Engl. J. Med. 334:349-355.
  • 32—Rappuoli et al. (1991) TIBTECH 9:232-238.
  • 33—Vaccines (1988) eds. Plotkin & Mortimer. ISBN 0-7216-1946-0.
  • 34—Del Guidice et al. (1998) Molecular Aspects of Medicine 19:1-70.
  • 35—International patent application WO02/02606.
  • 36—Kalman et al. (1999) Nature Genetics 21:385-389.
  • 37—Read et al. (2000) Nucleic Acids Res 28:1397-406.
  • 38—Shirai et al. (2000) J. Infect. Dis. 181(Suppl 3):S524-S527.
  • 39—International patent application WO99/27105.
  • 40—International patent application WO00/27994.
  • 41—International patent application WO00/37494.
  • 42—International patent application WO99/28475.
  • 43—Ross et al. (2001) Vaccine 19:4135-4142.
  • 44—Sutter et al. (2000) Pediatr Clin North Am 47:287-308.
  • 45—Zimmerman & Spann (1999) Am Fam Physician 59:113-118, 125-126.
  • 46—Dreesen (1997) Vaccine 15 Suppl:S2-6.
  • 47—MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1998 Jan. 16; 47(1):12, 19.
  • 48—McMichael (2000) Vaccine 19 Suppl 1:S101-107.
  • 49—Schuchat (1999) Lancet 353(9146):51-6.
  • 50—WO02/34771.
  • 51—Dale (1999) Infect Dis Clin North Am 13:227-43, viii.
  • 52—Ferretti et al. (2001) PNAS USA 98: 4658-4663.
  • 53—Kuroda et al. (2001) Lancet 357(9264):1225-1240; see also pages 1218-1219.
  • 54—Ramsay et al. (2001) Lancet 357(9251):195-196.
  • 55—Lindberg (1999) Vaccine 17 Suppl 2:S28-36.
  • 56—Buttery & Moxon (2000) J R Coll Physicians Lond 34:163-168.
  • 57—Ahmad & Chapnick (1999) Infect Dis Clin North Am 13:113-133, vii.
  • 58—Goldblatt (1998) J. Med. Microbiol. 47:563-567.
  • 59—European patent 0 477 508.
  • 60—U.S. Pat. No. 5,306,492.
  • 61—International patent application WO98/42721.
  • 62—Conjugate Vaccines (eds. Cruse et al.) ISBN 3805549326, particularly vol. 10:48-114.
  • 63—Hermanson (1996) Bioconjugate Techniques ISBN: 0123423368 or 012342335X.
  • 64—European patent application 0372501.
  • 65—European patent application 0378881.
  • 66—European patent application 0427347.
  • 67—International patent application WO93/17712.
  • 68—International patent application WO98/58668.
  • 69—European patent application 0471177.
  • 70—International patent application WO00/56360.
  • 71—International patent application WO00/61761.
  • 72—Robinson & Torres (1997) Seminars in Immunology 9:271-283.
  • 73—Donnelly et al. (1997) Annu Rev Immunol 15:617-648.
  • 74—Scott-Taylor & Dalgleish (2000) Expert Opin Investig Drugs 9:471-480.
  • 75—Apostolopoulos & Plebanski (2000) Curr Opin Mol Ther 2:441-447.
  • 76—Ilan (1999) Curr Opin Mol Ther 1:116-120.
  • 77—Dubensky et al. (2000) Mol Med 6:723-732.
  • 78—Robinson & Pertmer (2000) Adv Virus Res 55:1-74.
  • 79—Donnelly et al. (2000) Am J Respir Crit Care Med 162(4 Pt 2):S190-193.
  • 80—Davis (1999) Mt. Sinai J. Med. 66:84-90.
  • 81—Parkhill et al. (2000) Nature 404:502-506.

Claims

1. A composition comprising a first hybrid protein having formula:

NH2-A-[-X-L-]n-B—COOH
wherein L is an optional linker amino acid sequence, A is an optional N-terminal amino acid sequence, B is an optional C-terminal amino acid sequence, and n is an integer greater than 1 and (a) an X1 comprises an amino acid sequence having at least 80% identity to SEQ ID NO: 41; and (b) an X2 comprises an amino acid sequence having at least 80% identity to SEQ ID NO: 42, mixed with a second hybrid protein having the formula: NH2-A-Y1-L-Y2—B—COOH
wherein (c) Y1 comprises an amino acid sequence having at least 80% identity to SEQ ID NO: 43; and (d) Y2 comprises an amino acid sequence having at least 80% identity to SEQ ID NO: 44.

2. The composition of claim 1 wherein n=2.

3. The composition of claim 1, wherein L has 20 or fewer amino acids.

4. The composition of claim 1, wherein L is a poly-glycine linker.

5. The composition of claim 4, wherein the poly-glycine linker is GSGGGG (SEQ ID NO: 27).

6. The composition of claim 1, wherein A has 40 or fewer amino acids.

7. The composition of claim 1, wherein B has 40 or fewer amino acids.

8. The composition of claim 1 further comprising a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier.

9. A method of raising an immune response against Neisseria meningitidis serogroup B bacteria in a subject comprising administering to the subject an effective amount of the composition of claim 1.

Referenced Cited
U.S. Patent Documents
5547670 August 20, 1996 Goldstein et al.
6013267 January 11, 2000 Blake et al.
6028049 February 22, 2000 Jacobs et al.
6165747 December 26, 2000 Ingham et al.
6197312 March 6, 2001 Peak et al.
6248329 June 19, 2001 Chandrashekar et al.
6709660 March 23, 2004 Scarlato et al.
6914131 July 5, 2005 Scarlato et al.
7348006 March 25, 2008 Contorni et al.
7368261 May 6, 2008 Rappuoli
7576176 August 18, 2009 Fraser et al.
7604810 October 20, 2009 Rappuoli
7785608 August 31, 2010 Zlotnick et al.
7862827 January 4, 2011 Giuliani et al.
8101194 January 24, 2012 Zlotnick et al.
8226960 July 24, 2012 Masignani et al.
8273360 September 25, 2012 Pizza et al.
8293251 October 23, 2012 Scarlato et al.
8394390 March 12, 2013 Galeotti et al.
8398988 March 19, 2013 Contorni et al.
8398999 March 19, 2013 Masignani et al.
8524251 September 3, 2013 Fraser et al.
8563007 October 22, 2013 Zlotnick et al.
8574597 November 5, 2013 Zlotnick
8703914 April 22, 2014 Arico et al.
8734812 May 27, 2014 Galeotti et al.
8840907 September 23, 2014 Pizza
20020160016 October 31, 2002 Peak et al.
20040092711 May 13, 2004 Arico
20040110670 June 10, 2004 Arico et al.
20040167068 August 26, 2004 Zlotnick et al.
20050222385 October 6, 2005 Pizza
20050232936 October 20, 2005 Arico et al.
20060051840 March 9, 2006 Arico et al.
20060115475 June 1, 2006 Carton et al.
20060171957 August 3, 2006 Pizza
20060240045 October 26, 2006 Berthet et al.
20060251670 November 9, 2006 Comanducci et al.
20070026021 February 1, 2007 Fraser et al.
20070082014 April 12, 2007 Costantino
20070253984 November 1, 2007 Khandke et al.
20080241180 October 2, 2008 Contorni
20090232820 September 17, 2009 Fraser et al.
20090285845 November 19, 2009 Masignani et al.
20100267931 October 21, 2010 Arico et al.
20120107339 May 3, 2012 Granoff et al.
20130236489 September 12, 2013 Serruto et al.
20140037668 February 6, 2014 Giuliani et al.
Foreign Patent Documents
0196056 October 1986 EP
0273116 July 1988 EP
0467714 January 1992 EP
0978565 February 2000 EP
1645631 April 2006 EP
1790660 May 2007 EP
2351767 August 2011 EP
8901612 July 1990 NL
WO-88/00238 January 1988 WO
WO-90/06696 June 1990 WO
WO-92/16643 October 1992 WO
WO-95/33049 December 1995 WO
WO-96/29412 September 1996 WO
WO-97/13860 April 1997 WO
WO-98/17805 April 1998 WO
WO-99/24578 May 1999 WO
WO-99/36544 July 1999 WO
WO-99/57280 November 1999 WO
WO-00/22430 April 2000 WO
WO-00/66741 November 2000 WO
WO-00/66791 November 2000 WO
WO-00/71725 November 2000 WO
WO-01/031019 May 2001 WO
WO-01/52885 July 2001 WO
WO-01/55182 August 2001 WO
01/64920 September 2001 WO
01/64922 September 2001 WO
WO-01/64920 September 2001 WO
WO-01/64922 September 2001 WO
WO-02/079242 October 2002 WO
WO-03/009869 February 2003 WO
WO-03/010194 February 2003 WO
WO-03/020756 March 2003 WO
WO-03/063766 August 2003 WO
WO-2004/032958 April 2004 WO
WO-2004/048404 June 2004 WO
WO-2004/065603 August 2004 WO
WO-2004/094596 November 2004 WO
WO-2005/106009 November 2005 WO
WO-2006/024954 March 2006 WO
WO-2006/081259 August 2006 WO
WO-2007/060548 May 2007 WO
WO-2007/127665 November 2007 WO
WO-2008/125985 October 2008 WO
WO-2008/149238 December 2008 WO
WO-2009/104097 August 2009 WO
WO-2010/028859 March 2010 WO
WO-2010/046715 April 2010 WO
Other references
  • Greenspan et al, Nature Biotechnology 17:936-937, 1999.
  • Blythe et al, Protein Science 14:246-248, 2005.
  • Greenbaum et al, Journal of Molecular Recognition, 20(2):75-82, 2007.
  • Morely et al, Vaccine, 20:666-687, 2002.
  • Boslego et al (In Vaccines and Immunotherapy, Cryz Jr., Ed. Pergamon Press, 1991, Chapter 17, pp. 211-223).
  • Feng et al (Infection and Immunity, 64(1):363-365, 1996).
  • Ellis, R.W. (Chapter 29 of “Vaccines” [Plotkin, S.A. et al. (eds) published by W. B. Saunders company (Philadelphia) in 1988.
  • Herbert et al, The Dictionary of Immunology, Herbert et al eds, Academic Press, 1995, one page.
  • Hoist et al (Vaccine 21:734-737, 2003).
  • 1997-11-17-NMshotgun.dbs and 1997-12-15-NM.dbs, located at <ftp://ftp.sanger.ac.uk/pub/pathogens/nm/old data/>.
  • Aasel et al. (1998). Abstract from the 11th International Pathogenic Neisseria Conference, Nice France, Nov. 1-6, 1998. pp. 37-38.
  • Adams (1996). “Should Non-Peer-Reviewed Raw DNA Sequence Data Release Be Forced on the Scientific Community?,” Science, 274: 534-536.
  • Aderson et al. (2010). “Effectiveness of a bivalent factor H binding protein vaccine across Neisseria meningitidis serogroups,” 17th International Pathogenic Neisseria Conference 2010, p. 196.
  • Ala'Aldeen et al. (2010) “Human antibody response to the meningococcal factor H binding protein (LP2086) during invasive disease, colonization and carriage,” Vaccine 28:7667-75.
  • Ambrose et al. (2006). “Characterization of LP2086 expression in Neisseria meningitidis,” 15th International Pathogenic Neisseria Conference 2006, p. 103.
  • Anderson et al. (2008). “Functional cross-reactive antibodies are elicited by a group B Neisseria meningitidis bivalent recombinant lipidated LP2086 vaccine in cynomolgusmacaques,” 16th International Pathogenic Neisseria Conference (IPNC) P100, pp. 170-171.
  • Anderson et al. (2009). “Development of a factor H binding protein vaccine for borad protection against invasive Neisseria meningitidis serogroup B (MnB) disease,” 10th European Meningococcal Disease Society Congress 2009, p. 39.
  • Anderson et al. (2009). “Epidemiology of the serogroup B Neisseria meningitidis (MnB) factor H binding protein and implications for vaccine development,” European Society for Paediatric Infectious Disease Symposium 2009, p. 505.
  • Anderson et al. (2012). “Potential impact of the bivalent rLP2086 vaccine on Neisseria meningitidis invasive disease and carriage isolates in two adolescent populations,” European Society for Paediatric Infectious Disease Symposium 2012, p. 807.
  • Anderson et al. (2013) “Potential impact of the bivalent rLP2086 vaccine on Neisseria meningitidis carriage and invasive serogroup B disease,” Hum Vacc Immunotherap 9:471-9.
  • Appendix I to Statement of Grounds of Appeal filed by df-mp on Sep. 28, 2012, in relation to EP1645631, 1 pages.
  • Appendix II to Statement of Grounds of Appeal filed by df-mp on Sep. 28, 2012, in relation to EP1645631, 2 pages.
  • Ashton et al. (1983). “Immunogenic and protective properties of meningococcal serotype 2a protein in the hen-embryo model,” J Med Microbiol 16(4):443-57.
  • Beernick (Jul. 2010) “Impaired immungenicity of a meningococcal factor H-binding protein vaccine engineered to eliminate factor h binding,” Clin Vac Immunol 17(7):1074-1078.
  • Beernink et al (Jul. 2006). “Rapid Genetic Grouping of Factor H-Binding Protein (Genome-Derived Neisserial Antigen 1870), a Promising Group B Meningococcal Vaccine Candidate,” Clinical and Vaccine Immunology 13(7):758-763.
  • Beernink et al. (Jun. 2008). “Bactericidal antibody responses, induced by meningococcal recombinant chimeric factor H-binding protein vaccines,” Infection and Immunity 76(6):2568-2575.
  • Beernink et al. (Sep. 2008). “Fine antigenic specificity and cooperative bactericidal activity of monoclonal antibodies directed at the meningococcal vaccine candidate factor h-binding protein,” Infection and Immunity 76(9):4232-4240.
  • BenMohamed et al. (2002). “Lipopeptide vaccines-yesterday, today, and tomorrow,” Lancet 2(7):425-431.
  • Bentley et al. (2004). Identification of two immunologically distinct domains on the LP2086 outer membrane lipoprotein of Neisseria meningitidis, 14th International Pathogenic Neisseria Conference 2004, p. 144.
  • Bernfield L. et al. (Sep. 2002). “Identification of a novel vaccine candidate for group B Neisseria meningitidis,” Thirteenth International Pathogenic Neisseria Conference, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway, pp. 116 and 124.
  • Biswas et al. (1995). “Characterization of IbpA, the structural gene for a lactoferrin receptor in Neisseria gonorrhoeae,” Infection and Immunity, 63(8): 2958-2967.
  • Blattner et al. (1997). “The complete genome sequence of Escherichia coli K-12,” Science 277 (5331): 1453-1474.
  • Borrow and Carlone. 2001. Serogroup B and C bactericidal assays, p289-304. In A. Pollard and M. Maiden (ed.), Meningococcal vaccines. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ.
  • Borrow R, Balmer P, Miller E. Meningococcal Surrogates of Protection—Serum Bactericidal Activity. Vaccine 2005;23:2222-2227.
  • Bouvier et al. (1991). “A gene for a new lipoprotein in the dapA-purC interval of the Escherichia coli chromosome,” J Bacteriol 173(17):5523-5531.
  • Bowe et al. (Jul. 2004) “Mucosal vaccination against serogroup B meningococci: induction of bacterial antibodies and cellular immunity following intranasal immunization with NadA of Neisseria meningitides and mutants of Escherichia coli heat-labile enterotoxin,” Infection and Immunity, 72: 4052-4060.
  • Cannon (1989). “Conserved Lipoproteins of Pathogenic Neisseria Species Bearing the H.8 Epitope: Lipid-Modified Azurin and H.8 Outer Membrane Protein,” Clinical Microbiology Reviews 2(Suppl.):S1-S4.
  • Cantini et al. (Mar. 2006). “Solution Structure of the Immunodominant Domain of Protective Antigen GNA 1870 of Neisseria meningitidis,” Journal of Biological Chemistry281(11): 7220-7227.
  • Capecchi et al. (2005) “Neisseria meningitides NadA is a new invasion which promotes bacterial adhesion to and penetration into human epithelial cells,” Molecular Microbiology, 55: 687-698.
  • Chen, et al. (1994). “Determination of the optimal aligned spacing between the Shine-Dalgarno sequence and the translation initiation codon of Escherichia coli mRNAs,” Nucleic Acids Res. 22(23):4953-4957.
  • Clinical Trial No. NCT00500032, (2007). “Blood collection for use in serological assay development from healthy adult volunteers,” U.S. National Institutes of Health, retrieved online at <http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00500032?term=NCT00500032&rank=1>.
  • Clinical Trial No. NCT00808028, (2008). “A study evaluating safety and immunogenicity of meningococcal B rlp2086 vaccine in adolescents,” U.S. National Institutes of Health, retrieved online at <http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00808028?term=NCT00808028&rank=1>.
  • Cohn et al. (2010). “Potential Impact of Serogroup B Vaccines: Prevalence of candidate vaccine antigens among invasive Neisseria meningitidis isolates in the United States,” 17th International Pathogenic Neisseria Conference 2010, p. 77.
  • Cole et al. (1998). “Deciphering the biology of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from the complete genome sequence,” Nature 394:651-653.
  • Comanducci et al. (Jul. 2004) “NadA diversity and carriage in Neisseria meningitides,” Infection and Immunity, 72: 4217-4223.
  • Comanducci, M. (2002). “NadA, a Novel Vaccine Candidate of Neisseria meningitides,” Journal of Experimental Medicine 195(11): 1445-1454.
  • Cordis, “Preparation of meningococcal antigens,” posted online on Feb. 2, 2005, 2 pages.
  • Cruse et al. (2003). Illustrated Dictionary of Immunology, 2nd Ed. CRC Press, pp. 46, 166, and 382.
  • Database accession No. NMB1994 (cf. XP2231040) (Tettelin et al.), uploaded Oct. 1, 2000.
  • Database UniProt (Oct. 1, 2000), “SubName: Full=Uncharacterized protein” retrieved from EBI, accession No. Q9JXV4 Database accession No. Q9JXV4.
  • Decision revoking the European Patent, filed in opposition against EP1976990, dated Nov. 11, 2013, 15 pages.
  • Decision to refuse a patent application, filed in the Opposition against EP1645631, dated Apr. 28, 2009, 7 pages.
  • Declaration by Dr. Ellen Murphy, Ph.D., dated Sep. 14, 2011, submitted in opposition proceedings for EP1645631, 4 pages.
  • Declaration by Dr. Julian Parkhill dated Jun. 12, 2008, submitted in opposition proceedings for EP1645631, 2 pages.
  • Declaration by Dr. Julian Parkhill, filed in the Opposition against EP1645631, dated Jul. 10, 2014, 5 pages.
  • Declaration by E. Richard Moxon dated Feb. 16, 2013, submitted in opposition proceedings for EP1645631, 5 pages.
  • Declaration by Ellen Murphy, filed in the Opposition against EP1645631, dated May 12, 2014, 3 pages.
  • Declaration by Emilio A. Emini, Ph.D., dated Nov. 2, 2011, submitted in opposition proceedings for EP1645631, 5 pages.
  • Declaration by Isabel Delany, dated Feb. 18, 2013, submitted in opposition proceedings for EP1645631, 5 pages.
  • Declaration by Prof. Paul Dunman, Ph.D., dated Sep. 25, 2012, submitted in opposition proceedings for EP1645631, 14 pages.
  • Declaration by Rino Rappuoli, dated Oct. 13, 2011, submitted in opposition proceedings for EP1645631, 5 pages.
  • Declaration by Vega Masignani dated Feb. 18, 2013, submitted in opposition proceedings for EP1645631, 4 pages.
  • Delgado et al. (2007). “Lipoprotein NMB0928 from Neisseria meningitidis serogroup B as a novel vaccine candidate,” Vaccine 25:8420-8431.
  • Dinthilhac and Claverys (1997). “The adc locus, which affects competence for genetic transformation in Streptococcus pneumoniae, encodes an ABC transporter with a putative lipoprotein homologous to a family of streptococcal adhesins,” Res Microbiol 148:119-131.
  • Dlawer et al. (2010). “Human antibody responses to the meningococcal factor H binding protein LP2086 during invasive disease,” 17th International Pathogenic Neisseria Conference 2010, p. 130.
  • Elzanowski et al. (2013). “The Genetic Codes, a compilation,” Retrieved from http://www.bioinformatics.org/JaMBW/2/3/TranslationTables.html.
  • European Medicines Agency, (Nov. 16, 2012). “European Medicines Agency recommends approval of first vaccine for meningitis B,” Press Release, 2 pages.
  • Experimental data: expression of NspA, ‘287’ and ‘741’ on 3 strains of bacteria, filed in opposition against EP1534326, dated Aug. 4, 2010. 2 pages.
  • Facts and Submissions dated May 21, 2012, in relation to EP1645631, 30 pages.
  • Farley J. et al. (Sep. 2002). “Characterization, cloning and expression of different subfamilies of the ORF 2086 gene from Neisseria meningitidis,” Thirteenth International Pathogenic Neisseria Conference, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway, p. 124.
  • Feavers et al. (2009). “Meningococcal protein antigens and vaccines,” Vaccine 275:B42-B50.
  • Fleischmann et al. (1995). “Whole-Genome Random Sequencing and Assembly of Haemophilus influenzae Rd,” Science 269:496-501.
  • Fletcher et al. (2004). “Vaccine Potential of the Neisseria meningitidis 2086 Lipoprotein,” Infection and Immunity 72(4): 2088-2100.
  • Fontana et al. (2002). A genomic approach Abstract from the 13th International Pathogenic Neisseria Conference, Oslo, Norway, Sep. 1-6, 2002. p. 248.
  • Fraser et al. (1997). “Genomic sequence of a lyme disease spirochaete, Borrelia burgdorferi,” Nature 390:580-586.
  • Fraser et al. (1998). “Complete genome sequence of Treponema pallidum, the syphilis spirochete,” Science 281:375-388.
  • Gene Browser, Nature Technology Corporation, filed in the Opposition against EP1645631, dated Jun. 26, 2013, 6 pages.
  • GenPept accession No. AAF42204, “hypothetical protein NMB1870 [Neisseria meningitidis MC58],” retrieved on Sep. 26, 2012, 2 pages.
  • Gervais et al. (1992). “Putative Lipoprotein Yaec Precursor,” Database Swissport Acc No. p28635.
  • Giuliani et al. (2006). “A universal vaccine for serogroup B meningococcus,” PNAS 103(29):10834-10839.
  • Giuliani et al. (2010). “Measuring antigen-specific bactericidial responses to a multicomponent vaccine against serogroup B meningococcus,” Vaccine 28:5023-5030.
  • Giuliani et al. (Feb. 2005). “The Region Comprising Amino Acids 100 to 255 of Neisseria meningitidis Lipoprotein GNA 1870 Elicits Bactericidal Antibodies,” Infection and Immunity 73(2): 1151-1160.
  • Gold and Stormo (1987). “Translation Initiation”, in Escherichia con and Salmonella typhimurium, Cellular and Molecular Biology, Ed. Neidhardt, pp. 1302-1307.
  • Goldschneider I, Gotschlich EC, Artenstein MS. (1969) Human immunity to the meningococcus. I. The role of humoral immunity. J Exp Med 129:1307-1326.
  • Goldschneider I, Gotschlich EC, Artenstein MS. (1969) Human immunity to the meningococcus. II. Development of natural immunity. J Exp Med 129:1327-1348.
  • Gorringe et al. (2009). “16th International Pathogenic Neisseria Conference: recent progress towards effective meningococcal disease vaccines,” Human Vaccines 5(2):53-56.
  • Grandi (2005). “Reverse vaccinology: a critical analysis,” in Encyclopedia of Genetics, Genomics, Proteomics and Bioinformatics, pp. 1322-1326.
  • Granoff, DM. (2009). Relative importance of complement-mediated bactericidal and opsonic activity for protection against meningococcal disease. Vaccine 27(Supplement 2): B117-B125.
  • Guillen et al. (1996). “Expression in Escherichia Coli and Immunological Characterization of a Hybrid Class I-P64K Protein from Neisseria meningitidis,” Biotecnologia Aplicada13(4):271-275.
  • Harris et al. (2008). “Development and qualification of serum bactericidal assays for Neisseria meningitidis serogroup B,” 16th International Pathogenic Neisseria Conference 2008, p. 268-269.
  • Harris et al. (2010). “Robustness of the Serum Bactericidal Activity (SBA) Assay for Neisseria meningitidis serogroup B,” 17th International Pathogenic Neisseria Conference 2010, p. 169.
  • Harris et al. (2011) “Preclinical evidence for the potential of a bivalent fHBP vaccine to prevent Neisseria meningitidis serogroup C disease,” Human Vaccines 7:1 (suppl) 1-7.
  • Hayashi and Wu, “Identification and characterization of lipid-modified proteins in bacteria,” Chapter 10 in Lipid Modifications of Proteins: A Practical Approach, Hooper and Turner (eds.), published in 1992, 27 pages.
  • Hem et al. (1995). “Structure and properties of aluminum-containing adjuvants,” Vaccine Design. Subunit and Adjuvant Approach, pp. 249-276.
  • Hodge et al. (2006). “Development of a luminex-based meningococcal rLP2086-specific human IgG assay,” 15th International Pathogenic Neisseria Conference 2006, p. 113.
  • Hoiseth et al. (2008). “LP2086 and MLST distribution in epidemiologically relevant strains of serogroup B Neisseria meningitidis,” 16th International Pathogenic Neisseria Conference 2008, p. 205.
  • Hoist et al. (2014). “Variability of genes encoding surface proteins used as vaccine antigens in meningococcal endemic and epidemic strain panels from Norway,” Vaccine 32:2722-2731.
  • Hou et al. (2005) “Protective antibody responses elicited by a meningococcal outer membrane vesicle vaccine with overexpressed genome-derived neisserial antigen 1870,” J Infect Dis 192(4):580-90.
  • Hung et al. (2011). “The Neisseria meningitidis macrophage infectivity potentiator protein induces cross-strain serum bactericidal sctivity and is a potential serogroup B vaccine candidate,” Infect Immun 79(9):3784-3791.
  • Interlocutory decision in opposition proceedings, filed in the Opposition against EP1645631, dated May 21, 2012, 82 pages.
  • Jacobsson et al. (2009). “Prevalence and sequence variations of the genes encoding the five antigens included in the novel 5CVMB vaccine covering group B meningococcal disease” Vaccine. 27:1579-1584.
  • Jansen et al. (2008). “Bivalent recombinant LP2086 vaccine to provide broad protection against Neisseria meningitidis B disease: immunological correlates of protection and how to assess coverage against invasive MnB strains,” 16th International Pathogenic Neisseria Conference 2008, p. 80-81.
  • Jansen et al. (2009). “Development of a bivalent factor H binding protein vaccine to broadly protect against invasive Neisseria meningitides serogroup B (MnB) disease,” European Society for Paediatric Infectious Disease Symposium 2009, p. 311.
  • Jansen et al. (2010). “Estimating effectiveness for Neisseria meningitidis serogroup B (MnB) vaccine candidates composed of non-serogroup specific antigens,” 17th International Pathogenic Neisseria Conference 2010, p. 37.
  • Jansen et al. (2011). “Monitoring the Breadth of Coverage of Meningococcal Vaccines: An Overview and Progress Update on the Pfizer Bivalent LP2086 Vaccine Program,” 14th Annual Conference on Vaccine Research, 2011, p. 74.
  • JCVI-CMR website showing Z2491 Sanger sequence (http://cmr.jcvi.org/tigr-scripts/CMR/shared/Genomes.cgi and links). (2010).
  • Jiang et al. (2003). “Using rate of acid neutralization to characterize aluminum phosphate adjuvant,” Pharma Dev Tech 8(4):349-356.
  • Jiang et al. (2006). “Serum IgG response induced by a bivalent recombinant LP2086 provides broad protection against serogroup B Neisseria meningitidis,” 15th International Pathogenic Neisseria Conference 2006, p. 113.
  • Jiang et al. (2008). “Prediction of broad vaccine coverage for a bivalent rLP2086 based vaccine which elicits serum bactericidal activity against a diverse collection of serogroup B meningococci,” 16th International Pathogenic Neisseria Conference 2008, p. 57-58.
  • Jiang et al., (2010) “Broad vaccine coverage predicted for a bivalent recombinant factor H binding protein based vaccine to prevent serogroup B meningococcal disease” Vaccine 28:6086-6093.
  • Johnson et al. (1999). “Analysis of the human Ig isotype response to lactoferrin binding protein a from Neisseria meningitidis,” FEMS Immun. Med. Microbial. 25(4): 349-354.
  • Jones et al. (2005). “Effects of adsorption to aluminum salt adjuvants on the structure and stability of model protein antigens,” J Biol Chem 280(14):13406-13414.
  • Jones et al. (2009). “Generation of human serum complement lots that perform consistently for use in Neisseria meningitidis serogroup B (MnB) vaccine clinical trials,” European Society for Paediatric Infectious Disease Symposium 2009, p. 566.
  • Juncker et al. (2003). “Prediction of lipoprotein signal peptides in gram-negative bacteria,” Protein Sci 12:1652-1662.
  • Klein et al. (2000). “Analysis of aluminum hydroxyphosphate vaccine adjuvants by 27AI MAS NMR,” J Pharma Sci 89(3):311-321.
  • Koeberling et al. (2007). “Improved immunogenicity of a H44/76 group B outer membrane vesicle vaccine with over-expressed genome-derived Neisserial antigen 1870,” Vaccine 25(10):1912-1920.
  • Koeberling et al. (2008). “Bactericidal antibody responses elicited by a meningococcal outer membrane vesicle vaccine with overexpressed factor H-binding protein and genetically attenuated endotoxin,” J. Infect. Dis., 198(2):262-270.
  • Koeberling et al. (2009). “Meningococcal outer membrane vesicle vaccines derived from mutant strains engineered to express factor H binding proteins from antigenic variant groups 1 and 2,” Clin Vac Immunol, 16(2):156-162.
  • Kovacs-Simon et al. (2011). “Lipoproteins of Bacterial Pathogens,” Infect Immun 79(2):548-561.
  • Legrain et al. (1995). “Production of Lipidated Meningococcal Transferrin Binding Protein 2 in Escherichia coli,” Protein Expression and Purification 6:570-578.
  • Lewis et al. (2010). “The meningococcal vaccine candidate neisserial surface protein A (NspA) binds to factor H and enhances meningococcal resistance to complement,” PLoS Pathogens 6(7):e1001027.
  • Liebl et al. (1997). “Properties and gene structure of the Thermotoga maritima alpha-amylase AmyA, a putative lipoprotein of a hyperthermophilic bacterium,” J Bacteriol 179(3):941-948.
  • Liechti et al. (2012). “Outer membrane biogenesis in Escherichia coli, Neisseria meningitidis, and Helicobacter pylori: paradigm deviations in H. pylori,” Front Cell and Infect Microbiol 2:article 29.
  • Lindblad, (2004). “Aluminium compounds for use in vaccines,” Immunol Cell Biol.,82(5):497-505.
  • Litt et al. (2004). “Putative vaccine antigens from Neisseria meningitidis recognized by serum antibodies of young children convalescing after meningococcal disease,” J Infect Dis 190(8):1488-97.
  • Lucidarme et al., (Sep. 16, 2009) “Characterization of fHbp, nhba (gna2132), nadA, porA, sequence type (ST), and genomic presence of IS1301 in group B meningococcal ST269 clonal complex isolates from England and Wales” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 47(11):3577-85.
  • Lucidarme et al., 2010 “Characterization of fHbp, nhba (gna2132), nadA, porA, and sequence type in group B meningococcal case isolates collected in England and Wales during Jan. 2008 and potential coverage of an investigational group B meningococcal vaccine” Clinical and Vaccine Immunology 17(6):919-929.
  • Madico et al. (2006). “The meningococcal vaccine candidate GNA1870 binds the complement regulatory protein factor H and enhances serum resistance,” J Immunol 177(1):501-510.
  • Marshall et al. (2008). “A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase 1 trial of ascending doses of meningococcal group B rLP2086 vaccine in healthy adults,” 16th International Pathogenic Neisseria Conference 2008, p. 271-272.
  • Marshall et al. (2011). “Phase I randomised controlled clinical trial of safety and immunogenicity of a meningococcal B bivalent LP2086 vaccine in healthy toddlers,” European Society for Paediatric Infectious Disease Symposium 2011, p. 189.
  • Marshall et al. (2012) “Safety and immunogenicity of a meningococcal B bivalent rLP2086 vaccine in healthy toddlers aged 18-36 months: A phase 1 randomized-controlled clinical trial,” Ped Infect Dis J 31:1061-8.
  • Marshall et al. (2013) “A phase 2 open-label safety and immunogenicity study of a meningococcal B bivalent rLP2086 vaccine in healthy adults,” Vaccine 31:1569-75.
  • Martin et al. (1998). “New Zealand epidemic of meningococcal disease identified by a strain with phenotype B:4:P1.4,” JID 177:497-500.
  • Martin et al. (2003). “Experimentally revised repertoire of putative contingency loci in Neisseria meningitidis strain MC58: evidence for a novel mechanism of phase variation,” Molecular Microbiology 50(1):245-257.
  • Mascioni et al. (2008). “Determination of the domain and solution structure of rLP2086, a meningococcal vaccine candidate and human factor H binding protein,” 16th International Pathogenic Neisseria Conference 2008, p. 77-78.
  • Mascioni et al. (2009) “Structural basis for the immunogenic properties of the meningococcal vaccine candidate LP2086,” J Biol Chem 284:8738-46.
  • Mascioni et al. (2010) “NMR dynamics and antibody recognition of the meningococcal lipidated outer membrane protein LP2086 in micellar solution,” Biochim Biophys Acta 1798:87-93.
  • Masignani V. (Mar. 17. 2003). “Vaccination against Neisseria meningitidis using three variants of the lipoprotein GNA1870,” J. Exp. Med. 197(6):789-799.
  • McNeil et al. (2009) “Detection of LP2086 on the cell surface of Neisseria meningitidis and its accessibility in the presence of serogroup B capsular polysaccharide,” Vaccine 27:3417-21.
  • McNeil et al. (2010). “Anti-fHBP antibodies elicited after immunization with a recombinant fHBP vaccine candidate (rLP2086) can displace human Factor H from the surface of Serogroup B Meningococci,” 17th International Pathogenic Neisseria Conference 2010, p. 94.
  • McNeil et al. (2013) “Role of factor H binding protein in Neisseria meningitidis virulence and its potential as a vaccine candidate to broadly protect against meningococcal disease,” Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 77:234.
  • Meyer et al. (1984). “Pilus genes of Neisseria gonorrheae: Chromosomal organization and DNA sequence,” Proc. Nail. Acad. Sci. USA 81: 6110-6114.
  • Milagres et al. (1998). “Specificity of bactericidal antibody response to serogroup B meningococcal strains in Brazilian children after immunization with an outer membrane vaccine,” Infection and Immun. 66(10): 4755-4781.
  • Milagres, L. G., S. R. Ramos, C. T. Sacchi, C. E. A. Melles, V. S. D. Vieira, H. Sato, G. S. Brito, J. C. Moraes, and C. E. Frasch. 1994. Immune response of Brazilian children to a Neisseria meningitidis serogroup B outer membrane protein vaccine: comparison with efficacy. Infect. Immun. 62(10):4419-4424.
  • Minutes of the oral proceedings, filed in the Opposition against EP1645631, dated Feb. 11, 2014, 4 pages.
  • Munkley, et al. (1991). “Blocking of bactericidal killing of Neisseria meningitidis by antibodies directed against slacc 4 outer membrane proteins,” Microbial Pathogenesis 11: 447-452.
  • Murphy et al. (2008). “Sequence diversity of vaccine candidate LP2086 in Neisseria meningitidis serogroup B strains causing invasive disease,” 16th International Pathogenic Neisseria Conference 2008, p. 61.
  • Murphy et al. (2010). “Prevalence of Factor H Binding Protein (fHBP) Variants in N. meningitidis Carriage Isolates,” 17th International Pathogenic Neisseria Conference 2010, p. 96.
  • Murphy et al., (2009) “Sequence diversity of the factor H binding protein vaccine candidate in epidemiologically relevant strains of serogroup B Neisseria meningitidis” J Infect Dis 200:379-389.
  • Nassif (2000). “A Furtive Pathogen Revealed,” Science 287: 1767-1768.
  • Notice of Opposition against EP 1562983, filed on Jul. 1, 2014, 23 pages.
  • Notice of Opposition against EP1645631, filed in the Opposition against EP1645631, dated Jul. 23, 2008, 25 pages.
  • Notice of Opposition against European Patent EP 1645631, granted on Oct. 24, 2007. Opposition filed on Jul. 23, 2008. 20 pages.
  • Notice of Opposition filed May 24, 2012, filed in opposition against EP1976990, 19 pages.
  • Novartis (Jan. 22, 2013) “Novartis receives EU approval for Bexsero®, first vaccine to prevent the leading cause of life-threatening meningitis across Europe,” Media Release, 3 pages.
  • Novartis (Jun. 9, 2011). “Novartis candidate vaccine Bexsero® shows significant potential in providing broad coverage against meningococcal serogroup B infections.” Media Release, 6 pages.
  • Novartis (Oct. 9, 2008) “New Phase II data show Novartis investigational Meningitis B vaccine may also protect infants six months and older,” Media Release, 4 pages.
  • Opponent's Further Submission in Preparation of the Oral Proceedings, filed in the Opposition against EP1645631, dated Nov. 3, 2011, 6 pages.
  • Opponent's Response to the Patentee's Submission dated Feb. 18, 2013, filed in the Opposition against EP1645631, dated Jul. 24 2014, 34 pages.
  • Opponents Final Written Submission in Preparation of Oral Proceedings, filed in the Opposition against EP1645631, dated Sep. 14, 2011, 28 pages.
  • ORF Finder (2013). “Bacterial Code,” Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gorf/gorf.html, 3 pages.
  • Pajon et al. (2012). “Design of meningococcal factor H binding protein mutant vaccines that do not bind human complement factor H,” Infect Immun 80:2667-2677.
  • Pajon et al., “Frequency of factor H-binding protein modular groups and susceptibility to cross-reactive bactericidal activity in invasive meningococcal isolates” Vaccine 28 (2010):2122-2129.
  • Pannekoek (1995). “Construction of recombinant neisserial Hsp60 proteins and mapping of antigenic domains,” Mol Microbiol 5(2):277-85. Abstract.
  • Parkhill, “Campylobacter jejuni genome sequence at the Sanger Centre,” Post on BIOSCI/Bionet of May 8, 1998.
  • Parkhill, J. et al. (Mar. 2000). “Complete DNA Sequence of a Serogroup a Strain of Neisseria meningitides Z2491,” Nature 404(6777):502-506.
  • Patentee's Submissions under Rule 116 EPC, filed in the Opposition against EP1645631, dated Sep. 13, 2011, 13 pages.
  • Patentees' Response to Opposition against European Patent EP 1645631, granted on Oct. 24, 2007. 13 pages.
  • Pettersson et al. (1993). “Molecular Characterization of the 98-Kilodalton Iron-Regulated Outer Membrane Protein of Neisseria meningitidis,” Infection and Immunity 61(11):4724-4733.
  • Pettersson, et al. (2006). “Vaccine potential of the Neisseria meningitidis lactoferrin-binding proteins LbpA and LbpB,” Vaccine 24(17):3545-3557.
  • Pillai et al. (2005) “Outer membrane protein (OMP) based vaccine for Neisseria meningitidis serogroup B,” Vaccine 23(17-18):2206-2209.
  • Pizza et al. (2000). “Identification of Vaccine Candidates Against Serogroup B Meningococcus by Whole-Genome Sequencing,” Science 287(5459):1816-1820.
  • Pizza et al. (2008) “Factor H-binding protein, a unique meningococcal vaccine antigen” Vaccine 26S:I46-8.
  • Progress through the Sanger Institute FTP server (May 12, 2009), 15 pages.
  • Prosite, “ScanProsite Results Viewer: USERSEQ1 (280aa),” retrieved on Jun. 21, 2012, 1 page.
  • PSORT analysis of 200 of the sequences disclosed in PCT/US99/09346 (Jan. 1, 2010), 209 pages.
  • PSORT analysis of SEQ ID NOs: 4 and 6, and of ‘Contig295’ 300mer (May 8, 2009), 5 pages.
  • PSORT prediction result for SEQ ID No: 2 (Mar. 30, 2010), 1 page.
  • Pugsley (1993). “The complete general secretory pathway in gram-negative bacteria,” Microbiological Rev 5(1):50-108.
  • Renauld-Mongenie et al. (1997). “Identification of Human Transferrin-Binding Sites Within Meningococcal Transferrin-Binding Protein B,” J. Bacteriology 197(20):6400-6407.
  • Response to Appeal filed by Carpmaels & Ransford on Feb. 18, 2013, in relation to EP1645631, 21 pages.
  • Response to Appeal filed by df-mp on Feb. 18, 2013, in relation to EP1645631, 28 pages.
  • Response to Communication, filed in EP Application No. 07075161.5. Oct. 28, 2009.
  • Richmond et al. (2008). “A randomized, observer-blinded, active control, phase 1 trial of meningococcal serogroup B rLP2086 vaccine in healthy children and adolescents aged 8 to 14 years,” 16th International Pathogenic Neisseria Conference 2008, p. 270-271.
  • Richmond et al. (2010). “Safety & immunogenicity of serogroup B Neisseria meningitidis (MnB) rLP2086 vaccine in adults and adolescent subjects: overview of 3 clinical trials,” 17th International Pathogenic Neisseria Conference 2010, p. 37.
  • Richmond et al. (2011). “Phase II randomised controlled trial of safety and immunogenicity of a meningococcal B bivalent vaccine (rLP2086) in healthy adolescents,” European Society for Paediatric Infectious Disease Symposium 2011, p. 192.
  • Richmond et al. (2012) “A bivalent Neisseria meningitidis recombinant lipidated factor H binding protein vaccine in young adults: Results of a randomized, controlled, dose-escalation phase 1 trial,” Vaccine 30(43):6163-74.
  • Richmond et al. (2012a) “Safety, immunogenicity, and tolerability of meningococcal serogroup B bivalent recombinant lipoprotein 2086 vaccine in healthy adolescents: a randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial,” Lancet Infect Dis 12:597-607.
  • Rinaudo et al. (2009). “Vaccinology in the genome era”, The Journal of Clinical Investigation, 119(9):2515-2525.
  • Romero et al., “Current status of Meningococcal group B vaccine candidates: capsular or noncapsular?” Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 7(4):559-575, 1994.
  • Sanger Centre's “Projects” website as of Dec. 10, 1997 as retrievable via http://web.archive.org.
  • Scarselli et al. (Feb. 13, 2009). “Epitope Mapping of a Bactericidal Monoclonal Antibody against the Factor H Binding Protein of Neisseria meningitides,” Journal of Molecular Biology 386(1):97-108.
  • Schneider et al. (Apr. 16, 2009) “Neisseria meningitidis recruits factor H using protein mimicry of host carbohydrates,” Nature 458(7240):890-893.
  • Seeber et al. (1991). “Predicting the adsorption of proteins by aluminum-containing adjuvants,” Vaccine 9(3):201-203.
  • Seib et al. (2010). “Influence of serogroup B meningococcal vaccine antigens on growth and survival of the mengococcus in vitro and in ex vivo and in vivo models of infection,” Vaccine 28(12):2416-2427.
  • Seib et al. (2011). “Characterization of Diverse Subvariants of the Meningococcal Factor H (fH) Binding Protein for Their Ability to Bind fH, to Mediate Serum Resistance, and To Induce Bactericidal Antibodies,” Infect Immun, 79(2):970-81.
  • Sequence for “Putative Lipoprotein [Neisseria Meningitidis Z2491],” NCBI Reference Sequence: YP002342062.1, Mar. 30, 2000.
  • Serruto et al. (2009). “Genome-based approaches to develop vaccines against bacterial pathogens,” Vaccine 27:3245-3250.
  • Serruto et al. (2010). “Neisseria meningitidis GNA2132, a heparin-binding protein that induces protective immunity in humans,” PNAS 107(8):3770-3775.
  • Sheldon et al. (2011). “Phase 1, Randomized, Open-Label, Study to Assess the Safety and Immunogenicity of Serogroup B Neisseria Meningitidis (Mnb) rLP2086 Vaccine in Healthy Adults,” 14th Annual Conference on Vaccine Research, 2011, p. 59-60.
  • Sheldon et al. (2012) “A phase 1, randomized, open-label, active-controlled trial to assess the safety of a meningococcal serogroup B bivalent rLP2086 vaccine in healthy adults,” Hum Vacc Immunotherap 8:1-8.
  • Shevchik et al. (1996). “Characterization of pectin methylesterase B, an outer membrane lipoprotein of Erwinia chrysanthemi 3937,” Mole Microbiol 19(3):455-466.
  • Sigma Catalog (1996). pp. 1957-1963.
  • Sprengart et al. (1997). “Functional importance of RNA interactions in selection of translation initiation codons,” Molecular Microbilogy, 24(1): 19-28.
  • Statement of Grounds of Appeal filed by Carpmaels & Ransford on Oct. 4, 2012, in relation to EP1645631, 9 pages.
  • Statement of Grounds of Appeal filed by df-mp on Sep. 28, 2012, in relation to EP1645631, 54 pages.
  • Submission of the Patentee of Jul. 6, 2012, filed Jun. 24, 2014, in the Opposition against EP1645631, 4 pages.
  • Summons to oral proceedings pursuant to Rule 115(1) EPC, filed in the Opposition against EP1645631, dated Nov. 11, 2013, 12 pages.
  • Supplemental Submissions in Opposition against European Patent EP 1645631, granted on Oct. 24, 2007. Opposition filed on May 25, 2010. 28 pages.
  • Supplementary Declaration by Dr. Julian Parkhill, dated May 10, 2010, submitted in opposition proceedings for EP1645631, 4 pages.
  • Supplementary declaration by Ellen Murphy dated Sep. 26, 2012, submitted in opposition proceedings for EP1645631, 3 pages.
  • Supplementary declaration by Prof. Paul Dunman, Ph.D., dated Sep. 25, 2012, submitted in opposition proceedings for EP1645631, 14 pages.
  • Supplementary Submission to the Grounds of Appeal, filed in the Opposition against EP1645631, dated Sep. 28, 2012, 2 pages.
  • Sutcliffe and Russell (1995). “Lipoproteins of gram-positive bacteria,” J Bacteriol 177(5):1123-1128.
  • Swaminathan (1996). “Molecular cloning of the three base restriction endonuclease R.CviJI from eukaryotic Chlorella virus IL-3A,” Nucleic Acids Research, 24(13): 2463-2469.
  • Tan et al. (2010). “Advances in the development of vaccines against Neisseria meningitidis,” NEJM 362(16):1511-1520.
  • Telford et al. (2003). “Genomic and Proteomics in Vaccine Design”, in New Bacterial Vaccines, edited by Ellis et al. Kleweur Academic/Plenum Publishers, USA. pp. 1-11.
  • Tettelin et al. (Mar. 10, 2000). “Complete Genome Sequence of Neisseria meningitidis Serogroup B Strain MC58,” Science 287(5459):1809-1815.
  • The printed output from the NCBI open reading frame finder (Oct. 20, 2008), 12 pages.
  • TIGR Microbal Database, filed in the Opposition against EP1645631, dated Jun. 20, 2012, 14 pages.
  • TIGR website as of 1998, 8 pages.
  • Tramont, (1976) “Specificity of inhibition of epithelial cell adhesion of Neisseria gonorrhoeae.” Infection and Immunity 14:593-595.
  • Turner et al. (2006). “Characterization of MspA, an Immunogenic Autotransporter Protein That Mediates Adhesion of Epithelial and Endothelial Cells in Neisseria meningitidis,” Infection and Immunity 74(5):2957-2964.
  • United States Office Action mailed on Feb. 11, 2009, for U.S. Appl. No. 10/181,600, filed Jan. 17, 2001, 5 pages.
  • United States Office Action mailed on Jul. 24, 2008, for U.S. Appl. No. 10/181,600, filed Jan. 17, 2001, 23 pages.
  • United States Office Action mailed on Jul. 7, 2009, for U.S. Appl. No. 10/181,600, filed Jan. 17, 2001, 23 pages.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 60/098,685, “Neisseria Spp, Polypeptide, Gene Sequence and Uses Thereof,” filed Sep. 1, 1998.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 60/647,911, “GNA 1870-based vesicle vaccines for broad spectrum protection against diseases caused by Neisseria meningitidis,” filed Jan. 27, 2005.
  • van der Lay et al. (1995). “Construction of Neisseria meningitidis Strains Carrying Multiple Chromosomal Copies of the PorA Gene for Use in Production of a Multivalent Outer Membrane Vesicle Vaccine,” Vaccine 13(4): 401-407.
  • Vesikari et al. (2013). “Immunogenicity and safety of an investigational multicomponent, recombinant, meningococcal serogroup B vaccine (4CMenB) administered concomitantly with routine infant and child vaccinations: results of two randomized trials,” Lancet 381:625-35.
  • von Heijne (1989). “The structure of signal peptides from bacterial lipoproteins,” Protein Engineering 2(7):531-534.
  • Voulhoux and Tommassen (2002). “Transport of lipoproteins to the cell surfac in Neisseria meningitidis,” 13th International Pathogenic Neisseria Conference 2002, p. 31.
  • Wang et al. (2010). “Prevalence and genetic diversity of candidate vaccine antigens among invasive Neisseria meningitidis isolates in the United States,” 17th International Pathogenic Neisseria Conference 2010, p. 122.
  • Welsch et al. (2002). “Genome-derived antigen (GNA) 2132 elicits protective serum antibodies to groups B and C Neisseria meningitidis strains,” 13th International Pathogenic Neisseria Conference 2002, p. 25.
  • Welsch et al. (2003). “Antibody to genome-derived neisserial antigen 2132, a Neisseria meningitidis candidate vaccine, confers protection against bacteremia in the absence of complement-mediated bactericidal activity” Journal of Infectious Diseases 188 (11):1730-1740.
  • Welsch et al. (2004). “Protective Activity of Monclonal Antibodies to Genome-Derived Neisserial Antigen 1870, a Neisseria meningitidis Candidate Vaccine,” The Journal of Immunology 172: 5606-5615.
  • Welsch et al. (2007) “A novel mechanism for complement-mediated killing of encapsulated Neisseria meningitidis elicited by monoclonal antibodies to factor H-binding protein (genome-derived Neisserial antigen 1870)” Molecular Immunology 44(1-3):256.
  • Welsch et al. (Apr. 1, 2008). “Complement-dependent synergistic bactericidal activity of antibodies against factor H-binding protein, a sparsely distributed meningococcal vaccine antigen,” J Infect Dis 197(7):1053-1061.
  • Woods, et al. (1987). “Resistance to meningococcemia apparently conferred by anti-H.8 monoclonal antibody is due to contaminating endotoxin and not to specific immunoprotection,” Infection and Immunity 55(8):1927-1928.
  • Written Submission to Oral Proceedings, filed in opposition against EP1976990, dated Jul. 24, 2013, 11 pages.
  • Wu et al. (1996). “A protein class database organized with ProSite protein groups and PIR superfamilies,” J Comp Biol 3(4):547-561.
  • York et al. (2010). “fHBP epidemiology of invasive meningococcal B isolates from Spain and Germany: age based,” 17th International Pathogenic Neisseria Conference 2010, p. 109.
  • Zhu et al. (2004). “Evaluation of the purified recombinant lipidated P2086 protein as a vaccine candidate for group B Neisseria meningitidis in a murine nasal challenge model,” 14th International Pathogenic Neisseria Conference 2004, p. 199.
  • Zhu et al. (2005) “Evaluation of recombinant lipidated P2086 protein as a vaccine candidate for group B Neisseria meningitidis in a murine nasal challenge model,” Infect Immun 73(10):6838-45.
  • Zhu et al. (2006) “Intranasal immunization of mice with recombinant lipidated P2086 protein reduces nasal colonization of group B Neisseria meningitidis,” Vaccine 24:5420-5.
  • Zhu et al. (2006). “Effective immunization strategy against group B Neisseria meningitidis using purified recombinant lipidated P2086 protein,” 15th International Pathogenic Neisseria Conference 2006, p. 47.
  • Zlotnick et al. (2009). “Epidemiology of the serogroup B Neisseria meningitidis (MnB) factor H binding protein in strains sampled from Spain and Germany in the years 2001-2006,” 10th European Meningococcal Disease Society Congress 2009, p. 81.
  • Zlotnick et al. (2010). “Biochemical and biophysical analysis indicates conformation plays an important role in the binding of hfH and antibodies to the fHBP of N. meningitidis,” 17th International Pathogenic Neisseria Conference 2010, p. 38.
  • Zollinger (1997). “New and Improved Vaccines Against Meningococcal Disease” in New Generation Vaccines, 2nd Ed., edited by Levine et al., Marcel Dekker, New York. pp. 469-488.
  • Zollinger et al. (2010). “Design and evaluation in mice of a broadly protective meningococcal group B native outer membrane vesicle vaccine,” Vaccine, 28(31):5057-5067.
Patent History
Patent number: 9011869
Type: Grant
Filed: Jun 13, 2011
Date of Patent: Apr 21, 2015
Patent Publication Number: 20110250223
Assignee: GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA (Rixensart)
Inventor: Mariagrazia Pizza (Siena)
Primary Examiner: Patricia A Duffy
Application Number: 13/159,370
Classifications
Current U.S. Class: Fusion Protein Or Fusion Polypeptide (i.e., Expression Product Of Gene Fusion) (424/192.1); Neisseria Meningitidis (424/250.1)
International Classification: A61K 39/00 (20060101); A61K 39/095 (20060101); C07K 14/22 (20060101); A61K 39/39 (20060101);