Methods and systems for automated transportation of items between variable endpoints

- Harvest Automation, Inc.

An automated system for transporting items between variable endpoints includes a guidance system for identifying the endpoints and at least one autonomous mobile robot interacting with the guidance system for automatically moving items between the endpoints. The at least one robot is configured to (a) collect an item to be transported at a source end point, (b) travel to a destination endpoint utilizing the guidance system to locate the destination endpoint, (c) deliver the item to the destination endpoint, and (d) repeat (a) through (c) for a given set of items. The guidance system is dynamically reconfigurable to identify new endpoints.

Skip to: Description  ·  Claims  ·  References Cited  · Patent History  ·  Patent History
Description
BACKGROUND

The present application relates generally to transportation of items and, more particularly, to automated methods and systems for transporting items between variable endpoints.

BRIEF SUMMARY

An automated system for transporting items between variable endpoints in accordance with one or more embodiments includes a guidance system for identifying the endpoints and at least one autonomous mobile robot interacting with the guidance system for automatically moving items between the endpoints. The at least one robot is configured to (a) collect an item to be transported at a source endpoint, (b) travel to a destination endpoint utilizing the guidance system to locate the destination endpoint, (c) deliver the item to the destination endpoint, and (d) repeat (a) through (c) for a given set of items. The guidance system is dynamically reconfigurable to identify new endpoints.

A method of transporting items between endpoints in accordance with one or more embodiments includes the steps of: establishing a source endpoint and a destination endpoint; activating at least one autonomous mobile robot to automatically (a) travel to a source endpoint, (b) collect an item to be transported, (c) travel to the destination endpoint with the item, (d) deliver the item to the destination endpoint, and (e) repeat (a) through (d) for a given set of items; and changing the location of one or both of the source and destination endpoints, wherein the at least one robot dynamically adapts to changed endpoints to repeat steps (a)-(e).

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a simplified diagram illustrating use of a navigation system by robots to locate endpoints in accordance with one or more embodiments.

FIG. 2 is a simplified diagram illustrating use of beacons or passive tags by robots to locate endpoints in accordance with one or more embodiments.

FIG. 3 is a simplified diagram illustrating use of beacons and markers by robots to locate endpoints in accordance with one or more embodiments.

FIG. 4 is a simplified diagram illustrating use of markers by robots to locate endpoints in accordance with one or more embodiments.

FIG. 5 is a block diagram of various components of an exemplary robot in accordance with one or more embodiments.

Like or identical reference numbers are used to identify common or similar elements.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Various embodiments disclosed herein are generally directed to material handling methods and systems. In particular, automated methods and systems are provided for transporting items between variable endpoints. An automated system in accordance with one or more embodiments includes a guidance system for identifying the endpoints and one or more autonomous mobile robots or platforms interacting with the guidance system for automatically moving items between the endpoints. Each robot is configured to (a) collect an item to be transported at a source end point, (b) travel to a destination endpoint utilizing the guidance system to locate the destination endpoint, (c) deliver the item to the destination endpoint, and (d) repeat (a) through (c) for a given set of items. The guidance system is dynamically reconfigurable to identify new endpoints. The guidance system can mark a complete route or just the end points of a route for the robot.

Advantages of automated systems in accordance with various embodiments can include flexibility, minimal infrastructure, no programming needed, and adaptability to unstructured environments.

The automated system can be used across broad market segments. Automated systems in accordance with various embodiments can also be operated under a variety of conditions including the following. (1) The terrain is rough, e.g., outdoor environments where conventional material handling systems are difficult to use. (2) The surface over which material must travel cannot support heavy weight, e.g., the weight of trucks, forklifts or other mechanized solutions. (3) The workspace is unstructured and dynamic. In addition to most outdoor spaces, this description includes indoor spaces, where the workflow changes frequently or large objects (e.g., pallets) are often repositioned. (4) The pickup point or the drop off point or both, change during operations. (5) Obstruction of the workspace created by a fixed conveyor system is unacceptable. (6) Material must be moved long distances and system utilization is low to moderate. (7) The initial cost of the material-handling system is required to be low.

Platform

The form of an autonomous robot in a particular implementation can vary depending on payload and environmental factors. By way of example, if the robot operates on a flat surface inside a building, it can use a two-wheeled, differential drive mobility system. If it operates on a rough terrain, e.g., a construction site, it may use a tracked platform able to traverse inclines and loose soil.

Behaviors

The autonomous robots move items from a source or load point to a sink or unload point. The robot's basic behaviors depend on its relationship to the source and sink points and whether it is carrying a load. The following table describes some exemplary behaviors triggered by position and load status:

Position Load status Behavior Source Loaded Move toward sink Empty Stop, wait to be loaded Intermediate [Don't Proceed along the route until an care] endpoint is reached Sink Loaded Stop, wait to be unloaded Empty Move toward source

Beyond the basic behaviors outlined in the table, autonomous robots in accordance with various embodiments may have additional behaviors that are activated at intermediate positions along the route. These behaviors deal with obstacles (including other robots) discovered along the way.

Queuing

In accordance with one or more embodiments, each autonomous robot includes a sensor or other mechanism for detecting the presence of other nearby robots. If a robot encounters an obstacle along its route, it either stops or attempts to go around the obstacle. However, if the obstacle is another robot then the robot stops, thus forming a queue. Queues develop near endpoints of the route when robots wait to be loaded or unloaded.

Avoidance

If a robot encounters an obstacle along a route that is not another robot, the robot may attempt to continue toward its destination by skirting the object. The robot can include a wide-angle range sensor (see below) to provide it knowledge of obstructions on and near its route. This may make it possible for the robot to depart from a direct route and then return once the obstacle has been passed. However, whether the robot attempts to go around an obstacle or wait for the obstacle to move is a user choice. In generally uncluttered environments, it will be safe for a robot to search for an alternate route by itself. In more complex environments—especially those with non-geometric hazards—finding a safe alternative to the marked route may not be safe. Thus the user can instruct the robot whether to wait when the route is blocked.

Sensing

Route: In accordance with one or more embodiments, robots can navigate between source and sink using a guidance system such as a beacon marking the route's endpoints or a continuous route marker.

The beacon can be active (e.g., an IR emitter) or passive (e.g., a pattern recognized by an onboard camera). If a beacon is used, each robot should maintain a line of sight between the beacons, i.e., both beacons should be visible to the robot at nearly all times. The robot moves directly from one beacon toward the other unless an obstacle intervenes as described above.

The beacons can establish a coordinate system, where the beacon is the origin of the system. Angular encoding can be used to specify the axes of the coordinate system. The coordinate system enables robots to queue along a particular ray whose origin is the beacon. Angle encoding can also enable other useful properties.

A route marker indicating a robot's path may be used in situations where either a line of sight between beacons does not exist or traveling in a straight path between beacons is not desired. For example, a route marker might enable a robot to avoid a ditch at a construction site.

The route marker can be a worker-positioned tape or line, e.g., comprising a retro-reflective material that enables the robot to acquire it at a distance. The tape or line need not be permanently installed on the floor.

The robot can illuminate the tape or line using, e.g., conventional IR LEDs. In one or more embodiments, the robot detects the tape or line using a position-sensitive detector composed of discrete components (i.e., not a camera) to servo on the tape or line. The detector measures the degree of retro-reflectivity in view to eliminate false positives.

In some embodiments, the robots servo on the line directly. In other embodiments, the robots can servo at any selected offset with respect to the line. Offset servoing enables two important properties. When placing the line to mark the robot's path, workers need not allow space between line and objects. Any time the robot finds its path partially blocked by an object, it will increase its offset from the line so that it can follow the line without colliding with the object. A second feature enabled by offset following allows two robots that meet while traveling along the line in opposite directions to avoid collision. When the robots determine that a collision is imminent, each can offset its position relative to the line. They can thus pass without obstructing each other.

Obstacles: In order to move safely along its route, each robot is equipped with a sensor such as a wide-angle range sensor.

Robot: Each robot can be equipped with a sensor able to distinguish between obstacles and other robots at relatively short range. By way of example, this sensor can be an active IR emitter on one robot that is detected by a receiver on the other robot. The components of this system on the two robots can be arranged such that the following robot detects the robot in front only when the two are physically close.

Load: To allow autonomous operation, each robot can further include a sensor capable of detecting when the robot carries a load. The robot uses the output from this sensor to decide whether to wait at an end point or traverse to the opposite endpoint (see table above).

Manipulation: Robots may optionally include a mechanism enabling a robot to load and unload itself.

User interface: The interface for each robot is preferably simple and intuitive such that the workers themselves are able to setup material handling system wherever necessary. In one or more embodiments, no programming is required.

Implementation Examples

Automated material handling systems can have a wide range of applications, including, by way of example, the following:

Current Automated System Application Practice Solution Advantages Produce picker Laborers in Workers The automated conveyor the field pick establish system produce and routes for eliminates the place it in a one or more time workers basket or autonomous spend in transit sling. robots. The and eliminates Periodically, robots travel the need to carry they carry along crop heavy loads. the rows and stop produce at the from the collection field to a point. truck or Periodically a other robot arrives collection at the place point. where a worker is picking. The worker places just-picked produce on the robot then continues picking. Truck Loading Trucks back Robots move The automated up to the products into system reduces loading dock. the trucks. A the time and Workers move worker in the number of items from a loading area workers needed warehouse or places items to load a truck. other facility onto a robot Reduced loading into the and dispatches time translates loading area. it to the directly into cost There the correct truck. savings items may be A worker in especially in staged into the truck situations where orders or packs the customers must loaded truck. pay the trucking directly onto company for idle the trucks. time while trucks In either case, are loaded. workers make a large number of back and forth trips to move items into trucks. Baggage At small Ticket agents The automated Handling airports ticket place luggage system enables agents collect on robots more timely luggage onto queued in the departures by a tray or pull ticket area. reducing the cart as Bags then loading passengers move bottleneck. It also check in. immediately makes more Eventually, to the efficient use of a batch of aircraft airline personnel. bags is loading area. Bags can be hauled out loaded onto the to the airplane as airplane. passengers Loading arrive and need cannot begin not be loaded en until the mass just before batch arrives. takeoff. Contract Work is When a new The automated Manufacturing typically contract job system improves performed on begins routes the efficiency of the are established low-volume subassemblies between the manufacturing by of a product at various stations providing the several where the work benefits of different will be done. automatic assembly The robots conveyor stations. The automatically systems where particular carry they cannot stations subassemblies now be used. involved and from each the flow of station to the work pieces next. among them may change with each contract job. Because workflow is frequently scrambled, fixed conveyor systems cannot be used. Stocking Workers Workers mark The automated shelves in place the start and system eliminates stores merchandise end points of multiple round on stocking a route. A trips. Workers carts then worker in the need set up a push the store's storage route only once, carts to the area loads then the robot correct area robots with will follow it of the store. the proper however many Popular items items. After times necessary. or items that the robots do not stack have well may delivered require their cargo many trips. to the proper areas (using an optional AutoOffLoad feature) workers can stock the shelves. Construction Obstructions Workers set The automated site material or soft up a route for system saves delivery surfaces at robots to time by relieving construction follow. A workers of the sites often worker at one need to manually prevent trucks end of the route cart material from from delivering loads robots the delivery truck material to the with material, to the work point. place where it and a worker at will be used. the work point In these cases unloads them. workers may need to make repeated trips to carry or cart item from the delivery point to the work area. Landscaping Trucks filled A route is The automated site material with plants established system reduces delivery and other with drop off the time needed items arrive points indicated. to distribute at a The robots are plants at landscaping loaded at the landscaping site. Because truck then sites. trucks cannot automatically drive on the carry plants to lawn all the proper point materials and drop them must be off. carried or handcarted to the places where they will be installed. Debris removal Workers Robots The automated tear out continuously system walls, carry debris eliminates the fixtures, away from the time workers and other work area as spend in transit items in it is generated. hauling debris. preparation Because the for new work area never construction. becomes The work cluttered with area becomes debris filled with demolition debris. Carts proceeds are brought in, more loaded with efficiently. debris, and it is moved to a dumpster, usually located outdoors. Consumer leaf Removing The The automated collection fallen leaves homeowner system makes typically places a raking faster involves beacon at the and easier. raking the point where leaves into a the leaves are pile, placing to be deposited. the pile on a An automated wheelbarrow robot repeatedly or tarp, then travels between moving the the leaf deposit wheelbarrow point and the or tarp to a place where the collection owner is raking. point. The robot dumps the leaves using an optional dumping mechanism.

FIGS. 1-4 illustrate various possible guidance systems that can be used by robots to locate endpoints in accordance with one or more embodiments. In FIG. 1, the guidance system comprises a SLAM navigation system that gives robots 10 a global coordinate frame. In this formulation destinations are coordinates, thus no physical markers are necessary.

As shown in FIG. 2, beacons or passive tags 12 visible from a large distance mark each possible destination. This method allows the robot to reach any inbox or outbox without the need of a global frame.

FIG. 3 shows a guidance system combining shorter-range beacons 12 with “highways” established by markers 14 attached to the floor to give the robots a rough global frame. This arrangement simplifies range sensor requirements compared to SLAM.

In FIG. 4, robots are guided by marker 16 laid on the ground, in some cases temporarily.

FIG. 5 is a block diagram of various components of an exemplary robot 10. The robot 10 includes a chassis and a drive subsystem 52 for maneuvering the chassis. It further includes a guidance subsystem 54 on the chassis for interacting with the guidance system. In some embodiments, the subsystem 54 includes one or more marker detecting sensors able to detect the position of a marker such as a retro-reflective tape laid on the ground. By way of example, the marker detecting sensors can each comprise a photodiode-based sensor and one or more radiation sources (e.g., LEDs) to servo on the marker.

In some embodiments, the guidance subsystem 54 comprises a plurality of beacons, each having a radio frequency or other (e.g., infrared) beacon transmitter. In this case, the guidance subsystem 54 includes one or more sensors for detecting signals from beacons.

The robot includes an obstacle detection subsystem 56 for detecting other robots and obstacles.

The robot includes a microprocessor-based controller subsystem 58 for controlling operation of the robot in performing programmed behaviors. A power supply 50 for all the subsystems can include one or more rechargeable batteries.

In some embodiments, the drive subsystem 52 takes the form of a differential drive comprising two coaxial wheels and a roller for balance. The wheels are driven together or independently by one or more motors and a drive train controlled by the controller subsystem 58.

The obstacle detection subsystem 56 can include one or more range sensors to detect other robots and obstacles. In some embodiments, the range sensor is a wide-angle (120 degree) range sensor. Raw range sensor data (in the form of a list of angle and range readings) supplied by the sensor is processed by a computer processor (e.g., a processor in the controller subsystem 58) to return the position of other robots and obstacles.

The controller subsystem 58 is configured (e.g., programmed) to perform various functions, including transporting items between endpoints. The controller subsystem 58 is responsive to the output of guidance subsystem 54 and the output of obstacle detection subsystem 56. The controller subsystem 58 controls the drive subsystem 52 to maneuver the robot to prescribed endpoint locations.

Having thus described several illustrative embodiments, it is to be appreciated that various alterations, modifications, and improvements will readily occur to those skilled in the art. Such alterations, modifications, and improvements are intended to form a part of this disclosure, and are intended to be within the spirit and scope of this disclosure. While some examples presented herein involve specific combinations of functions or structural elements, it should be understood that those functions and elements may be combined in other ways according to the present disclosure to accomplish the same or different objectives. In particular, acts, elements, and features discussed in connection with one embodiment are not intended to be excluded from similar or other roles in other embodiments. Additionally, elements and components described herein may be further divided into additional components or joined together to form fewer components for performing the same functions.

The processes the robots are programmed to perform as described above may be implemented in software, hardware, firmware, or any combination thereof. The processes are preferably implemented in one or more computer programs executing on the programmable controller subsystem, which includes a processor, a storage medium readable by the processor (including, e.g., volatile and non-volatile memory and/or storage elements), and input and output devices. Each computer program can be a set of instructions (program code) in a code module resident in a random access memory. Until required, the set of instructions may be stored in another computer memory (e.g., in a hard disk drive, or in a removable memory such as an optical disk, external hard drive, memory card, or flash drive) or stored on another computer system and downloaded via the Internet or other network.

Accordingly, the foregoing description and attached drawings are by way of example only, and are not intended to be limiting.

Claims

1. An automated dynamically reconfigurable system for transporting items between changeable source and destination endpoints, comprising:

a guidance system for identifying the changeable source and destination endpoints; and
at least one autonomous mobile robot interacting with the guidance system for automatically moving items between the source and destination endpoints, said at least one robot being configured to (a) collect an item to be transported at a source endpoint, (b) travel to a destination endpoint utilizing the guidance system to located the destination endpoint, (c) deliver the item to the destination endpoint, and (d) repeat (a) through (c) for a given set of items;
wherein the guidance system is dynamically reconfigurable while the at least one autonomous robot is in operation to identify new endpoints by changing the source endpoint at which items are to be collected and/or the destination endpoint to which items collected at the source endpoint are to be delivered, and the at least one autonomous mobile robot is configured to automatically detect and dynamically adapt to the new source and/or destination endpoints while in operation in real time upon changing of the source and/or destination endpoints and without the at least one autonomous robot being previously programmed or reprogrammed by an operator with the new source and/or destination endpoints.

2. The system of claim 1, wherein the guidance system defines a route to the endpoints comprising route markers that are detectable by the at least one robot to guide the at least one robot to the endpoints.

3. The system of claim 2, wherein each marker comprises a retro-reflective material and the at least one robot each include a marker detecting sensor for detecting the retro-reflective material.

4. The system of claim 3, wherein the marker detecting sensor comprises a photodiode-based sensor and one or more radiation sources to servo on the marker.

5. The system of claim 2, wherein the at least one robot is configured to servo on the marker at an offset position relative to the marker, wherein the offset position can be automatically changed to avoid colliding with another robot servoing on the marker.

6. The system of claim 1, wherein the guidance system comprises a plurality of beacons, each identifying a different endpoint.

7. The system of claim 1, wherein the guidance system comprises a plurality of beacons, each identifying a series of intermediate locations leading to an endpoint.

8. The system of claim 1, wherein the guidance system comprises a plurality of beacons, and wherein each beacon includes an infrared emitter and the at least one robot includes a sensor for detecting signals from beacons.

9. The system of claim 1, wherein the guidance system comprises a plurality of beacons, and wherein each beacon displays a unique pattern and the at least one robot includes a camera system that can recognize the pattern.

10. The system of claim 1, wherein the at least one robot includes a range sensor to detect obstacles or other robots in its travel path.

11. The system of claim 10, wherein the at least one robot is configured to change its travel path to avoid the obstacle or other robot blocking its travel path or to wait until the travel path is unblocked.

12. The system of claim 10, wherein the range sensor is capable of distinguishing between detected obstacles and detected robots.

13. The system of claim 1, wherein the at least one robot comprises a plurality of robots, and each of the robots is configured to detect the presence of other robots and to form a queue when another robot is detected in its travel path at an end point.

14. The system of claim 1, wherein one of the at least one robot includes a mechanism to load or unload items at endpoints.

15. The system of claim 1, wherein the robot enables items to be manually loaded or unloaded at endpoints.

16. The system of claim 1, wherein each robot comprises:

a chassis;
an apparatus on the chassis for carrying an item;
a drive subsystem for maneuvering the chassis;
a subsystem on the chassis for interacting with the guidance system;
an obstacle detection subsystem on the chassis;
a controller on the chassis responsive to the subsystem for interacting with the guidance system and the obstacle detection subsystem and being configured to control the drive subsystem to travel between endpoints.

17. A method of transporting items using an autonomous mobile robot between changeable source and destination endpoints established at given locations, said method implemented in a microprocessor-based controller in the autonomous mobile robot, the method comprising the steps of:

(a) controlling the autonomous mobile robot to automatically identify and travel to a source endpoint to collect an item at the source endpoint to be transported;
(b) controlling the autonomous mobile robot to automatically identify and travel to a destination endpoint with the item to deliver the item to the destination endpoint;
(c) repeating (a) and (b) for a given set of items; and
(d) controlling the autonomous mobile robot to automatically detect a changed location of one or both of the source and destination endpoints, and to dynamically adapt to the changed location of the one or both of the source and destination endpoints in real time while the autonomous mobile robot is in operation to repeat steps (a) through (c), without previous programming or reprogramming of the autonomous mobile by an operator with the changed location of the source and/or destination endpoints.

18. The method of claim 17, wherein the source endpoint and a destination endpoint comprises defining a route between the endpoints using route markers that are detectable by the at least one robot to guide the at least one robot to the endpoints.

19. The method of claim 18, wherein each marker comprises a retro-reflective material and the at least one robot includes a marker detecting sensor for detecting the retro reflective material.

20. The method of claim 19, wherein the marker detecting sensor comprises a photodiode-based sensor and one or more radiation sources to servo on the marker.

21. The method of claim 18, further comprising controlling the autonomous mobile robot to servo on the marker at an offset position relative to the marker, wherein the offset position can be automatically changed to avoid colliding with another robot servoing on the marker.

22. The method of claim 17, wherein the source and a destination endpoint comprises placing a plurality of beacons at selected locations, each identifying a different endpoint.

23. The method of claim 17, wherein the source endpoint and destination endpoint comprises placing a plurality of beacons at selected locations, each identifying a series of intermediate locations leading to an endpoint.

24. The method of claim 17, wherein the source and destination endpoints are established by placing a plurality of beacons at selected locations, and wherein each beacon includes an infrared emitter and the at least one robot includes a sensor for detecting signals from beacons.

25. The method of claim 17, wherein the establishing the source and destination endpoints are established by placing a plurality of beacons at selected locations, and wherein each beacon displays a unique pattern and the at least one robot includes a camera system that can recognize the pattern.

26. The method of claim 17, wherein the at least one robot includes a range sensor to detect obstacles or other robots in its travel path.

27. The method of claim 26, wherein the at least one robot is configured to change its travel path to avoid the obstacle or other robot blocking its travel path or to wait until the travel path is unblocked.

28. The method of claim 26, wherein the range sensor is capable of distinguishing between detected obstacles and detected robots.

29. The method of claim 17, wherein the at least one robot comprises a plurality of robots, and each of the robots is configured to detect the presence of other robots and to form a queue when another robot is detected in its travel path at an end point.

30. The method of claim 17, wherein one of the at least one robot includes a mechanism to load or unload items at endpoints.

31. The method of claim 17, further comprising manually loading or unloading items at endpoints.

32. The method of claim 17, wherein each robot comprises:

a chassis;
an apparatus on the chassis for carrying an item;
a drive subsystem for maneuvering the chassis;
a subsystem on the chassis for interacting with the guidance system;
an obstacle detection subsystem on the chassis;
a controller on the chassis responsive to the subsystem for interacting with the guidance system and the obstacle detection subsystem and being configured to control the drive subsystem to travel between endpoints.
Referenced Cited
U.S. Patent Documents
3821504 June 1974 Shomaker et al.
3913758 October 1975 Faircloth et al.
4155198 May 22, 1979 Kelley
4217073 August 12, 1980 Propst
4401236 August 30, 1983 Germaine
4476651 October 16, 1984 Drury
4522546 June 11, 1985 Ringer
4700301 October 13, 1987 Dyke
4749327 June 7, 1988 Roda
4793096 December 27, 1988 Todd, Sr.
4854802 August 8, 1989 deGroot
4869637 September 26, 1989 deGroot
4994970 February 19, 1991 Noji et al.
5016541 May 21, 1991 Feaster, Jr.
5020964 June 4, 1991 Hyatt et al.
5020965 June 4, 1991 Tanaka et al.
5046914 September 10, 1991 Holland et al.
5051906 September 24, 1991 Evans, Jr. et al.
5081941 January 21, 1992 Weeks
5085553 February 4, 1992 Bouwens et al.
5160235 November 3, 1992 Bikow
5181818 January 26, 1993 Tanaka et al.
5211523 May 18, 1993 Andrada Galan et al.
5315517 May 24, 1994 Kawase et al.
5332363 July 26, 1994 Tanaka et al.
5348063 September 20, 1994 Handleman
5348361 September 20, 1994 Ilchuk
5403142 April 4, 1995 Stewart
5427492 June 27, 1995 Tanaka et al.
5496143 March 5, 1996 Breyer
5688102 November 18, 1997 Vieselmeyer
5769589 June 23, 1998 Lubbers
5819863 October 13, 1998 Zollinger et al.
5842306 December 1, 1998 Onosaka et al.
5959423 September 28, 1999 Nakanishi et al.
5974348 October 26, 1999 Rocks
5988971 November 23, 1999 Fossey et al.
6164537 December 26, 2000 Mariani et al.
6186730 February 13, 2001 Place
6212821 April 10, 2001 Adam et al.
6216631 April 17, 2001 Wissner-Gross
6243987 June 12, 2001 Hessel
6255793 July 3, 2001 Peless et al.
6336051 January 1, 2002 Pangels et al.
6347920 February 19, 2002 Place
6389329 May 14, 2002 Colens
6417641 July 9, 2002 Peless et al.
6431818 August 13, 2002 Place
6481948 November 19, 2002 Spears
6496755 December 17, 2002 Wallach et al.
6508033 January 21, 2003 Hessel et al.
6532404 March 11, 2003 Colens
6543983 April 8, 2003 Felder et al.
6611738 August 26, 2003 Ruffner
6638004 October 28, 2003 Berger et al.
6658324 December 2, 2003 Bancroft et al.
6667592 December 23, 2003 Jacobs et al.
6729836 May 4, 2004 Stingel, III et al.
6850024 February 1, 2005 Peless et al.
6854209 February 15, 2005 Van Horssen et al.
6857493 February 22, 2005 Shupp et al.
6915607 July 12, 2005 Tagawa et al.
6950722 September 27, 2005 Mountz
6984952 January 10, 2006 Peless et al.
6988518 January 24, 2006 Rackers
6997663 February 14, 2006 Siebenga
7069111 June 27, 2006 Glenn et al.
7086820 August 8, 2006 Blake
7137770 November 21, 2006 Ueda
7184855 February 27, 2007 Stingel, III et al.
7198312 April 3, 2007 Blaho
7200465 April 3, 2007 Stingel, III et al.
7261511 August 28, 2007 Felder et al.
7274167 September 25, 2007 Kim
7343222 March 11, 2008 Solomon
7400108 July 15, 2008 Minor et al.
7506472 March 24, 2009 Leyns et al.
7559736 July 14, 2009 Mohan
7579803 August 25, 2009 Jones et al.
7610122 October 27, 2009 Anderson
7613544 November 3, 2009 Park et al.
20010008112 July 19, 2001 Opitz
20020120364 August 29, 2002 Colens
20020146306 October 10, 2002 Morrell
20020182046 December 5, 2002 Schempf et al.
20030030398 February 13, 2003 Jacobs et al.
20030118487 June 26, 2003 Pressman et al.
20030165373 September 4, 2003 Felder et al.
20030199944 October 23, 2003 Chapin et al.
20040139692 July 22, 2004 Jacobsen et al.
20050090961 April 28, 2005 Bonk et al.
20050126144 June 16, 2005 Koselka et al.
20050135912 June 23, 2005 Schempf et al.
20050135913 June 23, 2005 Visser
20050238465 October 27, 2005 Razumov
20050246056 November 3, 2005 Marks et al.
20050254924 November 17, 2005 Swetman et al.
20050254927 November 17, 2005 Swetman et al.
20050268987 December 8, 2005 Rackers
20060045679 March 2, 2006 Ostendorff
20060072988 April 6, 2006 Hariki et al.
20060095169 May 4, 2006 Minor et al.
20060120834 June 8, 2006 Pressman et al.
20060213167 September 28, 2006 Koselka et al.
20060221769 October 5, 2006 Van Loenen et al.
20060257236 November 16, 2006 Stingel et al.
20060293810 December 28, 2006 Nakamoto
20070017181 January 25, 2007 Jacobsen et al.
20070042803 February 22, 2007 Anderson
20070129849 June 7, 2007 Zini et al.
20070140821 June 21, 2007 Garon et al.
20070152619 July 5, 2007 Sugiyama et al.
20070219720 September 20, 2007 Trepagnier et al.
20080046130 February 21, 2008 Faivre et al.
20080131254 June 5, 2008 Cope et al.
20080279663 November 13, 2008 Alexander
20090012667 January 8, 2009 Matsumoto et al.
20090021351 January 22, 2009 Beniyama et al.
20090054222 February 26, 2009 Zhang et al.
20090148034 June 11, 2009 Higaki et al.
20090175709 July 9, 2009 Okabe et al.
20090214324 August 27, 2009 Grinnell et al.
20090254217 October 8, 2009 Pack et al.
20110025454 February 3, 2011 Pomerantz et al.
20110301757 December 8, 2011 Jones et al.
20120114187 May 10, 2012 Duarte
20130110281 May 2, 2013 Jones et al.
20130110341 May 2, 2013 Jones et al.
20130325159 December 5, 2013 Kilibarda et al.
Foreign Patent Documents
3828447 March 1990 DE
0195191 September 1986 EP
0774702 May 1997 EP
S61204714 September 1986 JP
03-285602 December 1991 JP
07-065908 March 1995 JP
11-077579 March 1999 JP
2006-346767 December 2006 JP
2007-508667 April 2007 JP
2009-511288 March 2009 JP
94/22094 September 1994 WO
99/59042 November 1999 WO
2007/004551 January 2007 WO
2009/024246 February 2009 WO
Other references
  • International Search Report and Written Opinon for PCT/US20121057513, dated Mar. 4, 2013.
  • European Examination Report for EP09711619, dated Nov. 4, 2013.
  • SICK LMS 200 Technical Description, Jun. 2003 [online] [retrieved Sep. 11, 2014]. Retrieved from: http://www.sick-automation.ru/images/File/pdf/LMS%20Technicai%20Description.pdf.
Patent History
Patent number: 9147173
Type: Grant
Filed: Oct 31, 2011
Date of Patent: Sep 29, 2015
Patent Publication Number: 20130110281
Assignee: Harvest Automation, Inc. (Billerica, MA)
Inventors: Joseph L. Jones (Acton, MA), Clara Vu (Cambridge, MA), Paul E. Sandin (Brookline, NH), Charles M. Grinnell (Arlington, MA)
Primary Examiner: Kim T Nguyen
Application Number: 13/285,511
Classifications
Current U.S. Class: Having Particular Sensor (700/258)
International Classification: G06F 7/70 (20060101); G06Q 10/08 (20120101); G06Q 50/28 (20120101);