Multiple voltage level driving for electrophoretic displays
This application is directed to driving methods for electrophoretic displays. The driving methods comprise applying different voltages selected from multiple voltage levels, to pixel electrodes and optionally also to the common electrodes. In one embodiment, the different voltages are selected from a group consisting of 0V, at least two levels of positive voltage and at least two levels of negative voltage. The driving method is also suitable for a color display device.
Latest E INK CALIFORNIA, LLC Patents:
- Method for driving electrophoretic display device
- Electro-optic displays and driving methods
- Electro-optic displays and driving methods
- Switchable light-collimating layer with reflector
- Methods for achieving color states of lesser-charged particles in electrophoretic medium including at least four types of particles
This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/695,817, filed Jan. 28, 2010; which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application 61/148,746, filed Jan. 30, 2009. This application and is also a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/875,145, filed May 1, 2013; which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/633,788, filed Oct. 2, 2012. The above-identified applications are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
TECHNICAL FIELDThe present invention relates to methods comprising applying a voltage selected from multiple voltage levels to drive an electrophoretic display. The methods are also suitable for driving a color display device.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTIONAn electrophoretic display (EPD) is a non-emissive device based on the electrophoresis phenomenon of charged pigment particles suspended in a solvent. The display usually comprises two plates with electrodes placed opposing each other. One of the electrodes is usually transparent. A suspension composed of a colored solvent and charged pigment particles is enclosed between the two plates. When a voltage difference is imposed between the two electrodes, the pigment particles migrate to one side or the other, according to the polarity of the voltage difference. As a result, either the color of the pigment particles or the color of the solvent may be seen at the viewing side. An EPD may be driven by a uni-polar or bi-polar approach.
However, the driving methods currently available pose a restriction on the number of grayscale outputs. This is due to the fact that display driver ICs and display controllers are limited in speed on the minimum pulse length that a waveform can have. While current active matrix display architectures utilize ICs that can generate pulse lengths down to 8 msec leading to electrophoretic displays which have shortened response time, even below 150 msec, the grayscale resolution seems to diminish due to the incapability of the system to generate shorter pulse lengths.
In addition, the driving methods currently available are not sufficient for driving a color display device.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTIONThe present invention is directed to methods for driving an electrophoretic display, which method comprises applying different voltages selected from multiple voltage levels, to pixel electrodes and optionally also to the common electrode.
More specifically, the driving method for the display device comprising an array of pixels wherein each of said pixels is sandwiched between a common electrode and a pixel electrode, which method comprises applying a voltage to the pixel electrode which voltage is selected from the group consisting of at least four different levels of voltage.
The method allows for multiple voltage levels, specifically, 0 volt, at least two levels of positive voltage and at least two levels of negative voltage.
The method can provide finer control over the driving waveforms and produce a better grayscale resolution.
The first aspect of the invention is directed to a driving method for a display device comprising an array of display cells wherein each of said display cells is sandwiched between a common electrode and a pixel electrode, which method comprises applying different voltages selected from a group consisting of 0V, at least two levels of positive voltage and at least two levels of negative voltage, to the pixel electrode. In one embodiment, the different voltages are selected from a group consisting of 0V, three levels of positive voltage and three levels of negative voltage. In one embodiment, the different voltages are selected from a group consisting of 0V, −5V, −10V, −15V, +5V, +10V and +15V. In one embodiment, the voltage applied to the common electrode remains constant. In another embodiment, the method further comprises applying different voltages selected from a group consisting of 0V, at least two levels of positive voltage and at least two levels of negative voltage, to the common electrode. The different voltages applied to the common electrode are selected from a group consisting of 0V, three levels of positive voltage and three levels of negative voltage. In one embodiment, the different voltages applied to the common electrode are selected from a group consisting of 0V, −5V, −10V, −15V, +5V, +10V and +15V. In one embodiment, the display device is an electrophoretic display device.
The second aspect of the present invention is directed to a driving method for a color display device. The color display device comprises an electrophoretic fluid, which fluid comprises a first type of pigment particles, a second type of pigment particles and a third type of pigment particles, all of which are dispersed in a solvent or solvent mixture, wherein
-
- (a) the first type of pigment particles and the second type of pigment particles carry opposite charge polarities;
- (b) the third type of pigment particles has the same charge polarity as the second type of pigment particles but at a lower intensity; and
- (c) the second type of pigment particles has a threshold voltage.
The driving method for the color display device comprises applying a voltage selected from the group consisting of (i) 0 volt, (ii) a high positive voltage, (iii) a high negative voltage and (iv) a low positive voltage or a low negative voltage, to a pixel electrode.
An electrophoretic fluid 13 is filled in each of the electrophoretic display cells 10a, 10b, 10c. Each of the electrophoretic display cells 10a, 10b, 10c is surrounded by display cell walls 14.
The movement of the charged particles in a display cell is determined by the voltage potential difference applied to the common electrode and the pixel electrode associated with the display cell.
As an example, the charged particles 15 may be positively charged so that they will be drawn to a pixel electrode (12a, 12b or 12c) or the common electrode 11, whichever is at an opposite voltage potential from that of charged particles 15. If the same polarity is applied to the pixel electrode and the common electrode in a display cell, the positively charged pigment particles will then be drawn to the electrode which has a lower voltage potential.
In another embodiment, the charged pigment particles 15 may be negatively charged.
The charged particles 15 may be white. Also, as would be apparent to a person having ordinary skill in the art, the charged particles may be dark in color and are dispersed in an electrophoretic fluid 13 that is light in color to provide sufficient contrast to be visually discernable.
The electrophoretic display 100 could also be made with a transparent or lightly colored electrophoretic fluid 13 and charged particles 15 having two different colors carrying opposite particle charges, and/or having differing electro-kinetic properties.
The electrophoretic display cells 10a, 10b, 10c may be of a conventional walled or partition type, a microencapsulted type or a microcup type. In the microcup type, the electrophoretic display cells 10a, 10b, 10c may be sealed with a top sealing layer. There may also be an adhesive layer between the electrophoretic display cells 10a, 10b, 10c and the common electrode 11.
The second aspect of the present invention is directed to a driving method for a color display device. The color display device comprises an electrophoretic fluid, which fluid comprises a first type of pigment particles, a second type of pigment particles and a third type of pigment particles, all of which are dispersed in a solvent or solvent mixture, wherein
-
- (a) the first type of pigment particles and the second type of pigment particles carry opposite charge polarities;
- (b) the third type of pigment particles has the same charge polarity as the second type of pigment particles but at a lower intensity; and
- (c) the second type of pigment particles has a threshold voltage.
The first type of pigment particles and the second type of pigment particles may be white and black respectively, or vice versa. In this case, the third type of pigment particles is colored pigment particles which are non-white and non-black. The colored pigment particles may be red, green, blue, yellow, magenta or cyan.
Example 1In
Because of the attraction between the positively charged black pigment particles (52) and the negatively charged white pigment particles (51), there is a threshold voltage of 5V. Due to the threshold voltage, the black particles (52) would not move to the viewing side if an applied voltage potential difference is 5V or lower.
The colored particles (53) carry the same charge polarity as the black particles which have the threshold voltage, but are slightly charged. The term “slightly charged” is intended to refer to the charge level of the particles being less than about 50%, preferably about 5% to about 30%, the charge intensity of the black or the white particles. As a result, the black particles (52) move faster than the colored particles (53), when an applied voltage potential is higher than the threshold voltage of the black particles because of the stronger charge intensity they carry.
In
In
The colored particles (53) move towards the pixel electrode because they are also positively charged. However, because of their lower charge intensity, they move slower than the black particles.
In
In this example, the color state is driven from the white state (i.e.,
In
Because of the attraction between the positively charged black pigment particles (62) and the negatively charged white pigment particles (61), there is a threshold voltage of 5V. Due to the threshold voltage, the white particles (61) would not move to the viewing side if an applied voltage potential difference is 5V or lower.
The colored particles (63) carry the same charge polarity as the white particles which have the threshold voltage, but are slightly charged. The term “slightly charged” is as defined above.
In
In
In
In this example, the color state is driven from the black state (i.e.,
Therefore, depending on the color state displayed, the pixel electrode is applied a voltage selected from the group consisting of (i) 0 volt, (ii) a high positive voltage (e.g., +15V), (iii) a high negative voltage (e.g., −15V), and (iv) a low positive voltage (+5V) or a low negative voltage (−5V). In this scenario, no voltage is applied to the common electrode.
It is also possible to modulate the voltage applied to the common electrode and apply voltages to the pixel electrode to achieve the voltage potential differences required.
The magnitude of the “low” positive or negative voltage is about 5% to 50% of the magnitude of the “high” positive or negative voltage. For example, if a “high” positive voltage is +10 V, then a “low” positive voltage is +0.5-5 V
More details of the color display device are described in U.S. application Ser. Nos. 13/875,145 and 13/633,788; the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
The common electrode and the pixel electrodes are separately connected to two individual circuits and the two circuits in turn are connected to a display controller. In practice, the display controller issues signals to the circuits to apply appropriate voltages to the common and pixel electrodes respectively. More specifically, the display controller, based on the images to be displayed, selects appropriate waveforms and then issues signals, frame by frame, to the circuits to execute the waveforms by applying appropriate voltages to the common and pixel electrodes. The term “frame” represents timing resolution of a waveform.
Although the foregoing disclosure has been described in some detail for purposes of clarity of understanding, it will be apparent to a person having ordinary skill in that art that certain changes and modifications may be practiced within the scope of the appended claims. It should be noted that there are many alternative ways of implementing both the process and apparatus of the improved driving scheme for an electrophoretic display, and for many other types of displays including, but not limited to, liquid crystal, rotating ball, dielectrophoretic and electrowetting types of displays. Accordingly, the present embodiments are to be considered as exemplary and not restrictive, and the inventive features are not to be limited to the details given herein, but may be modified within the scope and equivalents of the appended claims.
Claims
1. A driving method for driving a color display device, which display device comprises an electrophoretic fluid sandwiched between a common electrode and a layer of pixel electrodes and the electrophoretic fluid comprises a first type of pigment particles, a second type of pigment particles and a third type of pigment particles, all of which are dispersed in a solvent or solvent mixture, wherein the method comprising: applying to a pixel electrode a voltage of a high positive voltage; applying to the pixel electrode a voltage of a high negative voltage; and applying to the pixel electrode a voltage of a low positive voltage or a low negative voltage, which is equal to or lower than the threshold voltage, wherein when the low positive voltage or low negative voltage having the same polarity as the second type of pigment particles is applied to the pixel electrode, a voltage potential difference between the common electrode and the pixel electrode drives an area corresponding to the pixel electrode to a color state of the third type of pigment particles, at a viewing side, from a color state of the first type of pigment particles.
- (a) the first type of pigment particles and the second type of pigment particles carry opposite charge polarities;
- (b) the third type of pigment particles has the same charge polarity as the second type of pigment particles but at a lower intensity; and
- (c) the second type of pigment particles has a threshold voltage,
2. The driving method of claim 1, wherein the first type of pigment particles and the second type of pigment particles are black and white respectively, or vice versa.
3. The driving method of claim 2, wherein the third type of pigment particles is non-white and non-black.
4. The driving method of claim 3, wherein the third type of pigment particles is red, green, blue, yellow, magenta or cyan.
5. The driving method of claim 1, wherein no voltage is applied to the common electrode.
6. The driving method of claim 1, wherein the magnitude of the low positive or negative voltage is about 5% to about 50% of the magnitude of the high positive or negative voltage.
7. The driving method of claim 1, wherein the first type of pigment particles is negatively charged and the second and third type of pigment particles are positively charged,
- when the high positive voltage is applied to a pixel electrode, the voltage potential difference between the common electrode and the pixel electrode drives an area corresponding to the pixel electrode to the color state of the second type of pigment particles, at the viewing side; or
- when the high negative voltage is applied to a pixel electrode, the voltage potential difference between the common electrode and the pixel electrode drives an area corresponding to the pixel electrode to the color state of the first type of pigment particles, at the viewing side; or
- when the low positive voltage is applied to a pixel electrode, the voltage potential difference between the common electrode and the pixel electrode drives an area corresponding to the pixel electrode to the color state of the third type of pigment particles, at the viewing side, from the color state of the first type of pigment particles.
8. The driving method of claim 1, wherein the first type of pigment particles is positively charged and the second and third type of pigment particles are negatively charged,
- when the high positive voltage is applied to a pixel electrode, the voltage potential difference between the common electrode and the pixel electrode drives an area corresponding to the pixel electrode to the color state of the first type of pigment particles, at the viewing side; or
- when the high negative voltage is applied to a pixel electrode, the voltage potential difference between the common electrode and the pixel electrode drives an area corresponding to the pixel electrode to the color state of the second type of pigment particles, at the viewing side; or
- when the low negative voltage is applied to a pixel electrode, the voltage potential difference between the common electrode and the pixel electrode drives an area corresponding to the pixel electrode to the color state of the third type of pigment particles, at the viewing side, from the color state of the first type of pigment particles.
3756693 | September 1973 | Ota |
3892568 | July 1975 | Ota |
4143947 | March 13, 1979 | Aftergut et al. |
4259694 | March 31, 1981 | Liao |
4298448 | November 3, 1981 | Muller et al. |
4443108 | April 17, 1984 | Webster |
4568975 | February 4, 1986 | Harshbarger et al. |
4575124 | March 11, 1986 | Morrison et al. |
5266937 | November 30, 1993 | DiSanto et al. |
5298993 | March 29, 1994 | Edgar et al. |
5378574 | January 3, 1995 | Winnik et al. |
5754584 | May 19, 1998 | Durrant et al. |
5831697 | November 3, 1998 | Evanicky et al. |
5923315 | July 13, 1999 | Ueda et al. |
5926617 | July 20, 1999 | Ohara et al. |
5980719 | November 9, 1999 | Cherukuri et al. |
6005890 | December 21, 1999 | Clow et al. |
6045756 | April 4, 2000 | Carr et al. |
6069971 | May 30, 2000 | Kanno et al. |
6075506 | June 13, 2000 | Bonnett et al. |
6111248 | August 29, 2000 | Melendez et al. |
6154309 | November 28, 2000 | Otani et al. |
6198809 | March 6, 2001 | Disanto et al. |
6337761 | January 8, 2002 | Rogers et al. |
6373461 | April 16, 2002 | Hasegawa et al. |
6486866 | November 26, 2002 | Kuwahara et al. |
6504524 | January 7, 2003 | Gates et al. |
6517618 | February 11, 2003 | Foucher et al. |
6525866 | February 25, 2003 | Lin et al. |
6532008 | March 11, 2003 | Guranlnick |
6538801 | March 25, 2003 | Jacobson et al. |
6600534 | July 29, 2003 | Tanaka et al. |
6639580 | October 28, 2003 | Kishi et al. |
6650462 | November 18, 2003 | Katase |
6657612 | December 2, 2003 | Machida et al. |
6671081 | December 30, 2003 | Kawai |
6674561 | January 6, 2004 | Ohnishi et al. |
6680726 | January 20, 2004 | Gordon et al. |
6686953 | February 3, 2004 | Holmes |
6693620 | February 17, 2004 | Herb et al. |
6704133 | March 9, 2004 | Gates et al. |
6724521 | April 20, 2004 | Nakao et al. |
6729718 | May 4, 2004 | Goto et al. |
6751007 | June 15, 2004 | Liang et al. |
6760059 | July 6, 2004 | Ham |
6796698 | September 28, 2004 | Sommers et al. |
6829078 | December 7, 2004 | Liang et al. |
6864875 | March 8, 2005 | Drzaic et al. |
6903716 | June 7, 2005 | Kawabe et al. |
6914713 | July 5, 2005 | Chung et al. |
6967762 | November 22, 2005 | Machida et al. |
6970155 | November 29, 2005 | Cabrera |
6987503 | January 17, 2006 | Inoue |
6987605 | January 17, 2006 | Liang et al. |
6995550 | February 7, 2006 | Jacobson et al. |
7009756 | March 7, 2006 | Kishi et al. |
7012600 | March 14, 2006 | Zehner et al. |
7019889 | March 28, 2006 | Katase |
7038655 | May 2, 2006 | Herb et al. |
7046228 | May 16, 2006 | Liang et al. |
7177066 | February 13, 2007 | Chung et al. |
7184196 | February 27, 2007 | Ukigaya |
7226550 | June 5, 2007 | Hou et al. |
7242514 | July 10, 2007 | Chung et al. |
7259744 | August 21, 2007 | Arango et al. |
7277074 | October 2, 2007 | Shih |
7283199 | October 16, 2007 | Aichi et al. |
7307779 | December 11, 2007 | Cernasov et al. |
7312794 | December 25, 2007 | Zehner et al. |
7342556 | March 11, 2008 | Oue et al. |
7349146 | March 25, 2008 | Douglass et al. |
7352353 | April 1, 2008 | Albert et al. |
7365732 | April 29, 2008 | Matsuda et al. |
7397289 | July 8, 2008 | Kojima |
7411719 | August 12, 2008 | Paolini et al. |
7417787 | August 26, 2008 | Chopra et al. |
7420549 | September 2, 2008 | Jacobson et al. |
7443466 | October 28, 2008 | Dedene et al. |
7446749 | November 4, 2008 | Lee et al. |
7474295 | January 6, 2009 | Matsuda |
7495651 | February 24, 2009 | Zhou et al. |
7504050 | March 17, 2009 | Weng et al. |
7545557 | June 9, 2009 | Iftime et al. |
7548291 | June 16, 2009 | Lee et al. |
7607106 | October 20, 2009 | Ernst et al. |
7639849 | December 29, 2009 | Kimpe et al. |
7679599 | March 16, 2010 | Kawai |
7686463 | March 30, 2010 | Goto |
7701423 | April 20, 2010 | Suwabe et al. |
7701436 | April 20, 2010 | Miyasaka |
7710376 | May 4, 2010 | E do et al. |
7733311 | June 8, 2010 | Amundson et al. |
7760419 | July 20, 2010 | Lee |
7773069 | August 10, 2010 | Miyasaka et al. |
7786974 | August 31, 2010 | Zhou et al. |
7791717 | September 7, 2010 | Cao et al. |
7792398 | September 7, 2010 | Tanaka et al. |
7800580 | September 21, 2010 | Johnson et al. |
7804483 | September 28, 2010 | Zhou et al. |
7808696 | October 5, 2010 | Lee et al. |
7830592 | November 9, 2010 | Sprague et al. |
7839381 | November 23, 2010 | Zhou et al. |
7868874 | January 11, 2011 | Reynolds |
7911444 | March 22, 2011 | Yee |
7911681 | March 22, 2011 | Ikegami et al. |
7952558 | May 31, 2011 | Yang et al. |
7982941 | July 19, 2011 | Lin et al. |
7995029 | August 9, 2011 | Johnson |
7999787 | August 16, 2011 | Amundson et al. |
8018450 | September 13, 2011 | Kimura et al. |
8035611 | October 11, 2011 | Sakamoto |
8044927 | October 25, 2011 | Inoue |
8054253 | November 8, 2011 | Yoo |
8072675 | December 6, 2011 | Lin et al. |
8115729 | February 14, 2012 | Danner et al. |
8120838 | February 21, 2012 | Lin et al. |
8125501 | February 28, 2012 | Amundson et al. |
8159636 | April 17, 2012 | Sun et al. |
8164823 | April 24, 2012 | Ikegami et al. |
8169690 | May 1, 2012 | Lin et al. |
8228289 | July 24, 2012 | Nagasaki |
8237892 | August 7, 2012 | Sprague et al. |
8243013 | August 14, 2012 | Sprague et al. |
8274472 | September 25, 2012 | Wang et al. |
8334836 | December 18, 2012 | Kanamori et al. |
8395836 | March 12, 2013 | Lin et al. |
8422116 | April 16, 2013 | Sprague et al. |
8462102 | June 11, 2013 | Wong et al. |
20030193565 | October 16, 2003 | Wen et al. |
20040227746 | November 18, 2004 | Shih |
20040246562 | December 9, 2004 | Chung et al. |
20040263947 | December 30, 2004 | Drzaic et al. |
20050179642 | August 18, 2005 | Wilcox et al. |
20060132426 | June 22, 2006 | Johnson |
20060164405 | July 27, 2006 | Zhou |
20060202949 | September 14, 2006 | Danner et al. |
20070035510 | February 15, 2007 | Zhou et al. |
20070052668 | March 8, 2007 | Zhou et al. |
20070070032 | March 29, 2007 | Chung et al. |
20070080926 | April 12, 2007 | Zhou et al. |
20070080928 | April 12, 2007 | Ishii et al. |
20070103427 | May 10, 2007 | Zhou et al. |
20070132687 | June 14, 2007 | Johnson |
20070200874 | August 30, 2007 | Amundson et al. |
20070247417 | October 25, 2007 | Miyazaki et al. |
20070262949 | November 15, 2007 | Zhou et al. |
20070268563 | November 22, 2007 | Tam et al. |
20080042928 | February 21, 2008 | Schlangen et al. |
20080150886 | June 26, 2008 | Johnson et al. |
20080174531 | July 24, 2008 | Ash |
20080303780 | December 11, 2008 | Sprague et al. |
20090096745 | April 16, 2009 | Sprague et al. |
20100103502 | April 29, 2010 | Jacobson et al. |
20100134538 | June 3, 2010 | Sprague et al. |
20100165005 | July 1, 2010 | Sprague |
20100165448 | July 1, 2010 | Sprague |
20100194733 | August 5, 2010 | Lin et al. |
20100194789 | August 5, 2010 | Lin et al. |
20100238203 | September 23, 2010 | Stroemer et al. |
20100283804 | November 11, 2010 | Sprague et al. |
20100295880 | November 25, 2010 | Sprague et al. |
20110096104 | April 28, 2011 | Sprague et al. |
20110175875 | July 21, 2011 | Lin et al. |
20110175945 | July 21, 2011 | Lin |
20110216104 | September 8, 2011 | Chan et al. |
20110217639 | September 8, 2011 | Sprague |
20110261433 | October 27, 2011 | Sprague et al. |
20110292094 | December 1, 2011 | Lin |
20110298776 | December 8, 2011 | Lin |
20120007897 | January 12, 2012 | Yang et al. |
20120120122 | May 17, 2012 | Lin et al. |
20120274671 | November 1, 2012 | Sprague et al. |
20120307346 | December 6, 2012 | Sprague |
20120320017 | December 20, 2012 | Sprague et al. |
20130057463 | March 7, 2013 | Zhang et al. |
20130057942 | March 7, 2013 | Wang et al. |
WO 99/53373 | October 1999 | WO |
- U.S. Appl. No. 13/370,186, filed Feb. 9, 2012, Wang et al.
- U.S. Appl. No. 13/551,541, filed Jul. 17, 2012, Yang et al.
- U.S. Appl. No. 13/633,788, filed Oct. 2, 2012, Wang et al.
- U.S. Appl. No. 13/875,145, filed May 1, 2013, Wang et al.
- Kao, WC., Fang, CY., Chen, YY., Shen, MH., and Wong, J. (Jan. 2008) Integrating Flexible Electrophoretic Display and One-Time Password Generator in Smart Cards. ICCE 2008 Digest of Technical Papers, p. 4-3. (Int'l Conference on Consumer Electronics, Jan. 9-13.
- Kao, WC., Ye, JA., Lin, FS., Lin, C., and Sprague, R. (Jan. 2009) Configurable Timing Controller Design for Active Matrix Electrophoretic Display with 16 Gray Levels. ICCE 2009 Digest of Technical Papers, 10.2-2.
- Kao, WC., (Feb. 2009) Configurable Timing Controller Design for Active Matrix Electrophoretic Dispaly. IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, 2009, vol. 55, Issue 1, pp. 1-5.
- Sprague, R.A. (May 18, 2011) Active Matrix Displays for e-Readers Using Microcup Electrophoretics. Presentation conducted at SID 2011, 49 Int'l Symposium, Seminar and Exhibition, May 15-May 20, 2011, Los Angeles Convention Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Type: Grant
Filed: May 13, 2013
Date of Patent: Feb 2, 2016
Patent Publication Number: 20130300727
Assignee: E INK CALIFORNIA, LLC (Fremont, CA)
Inventors: Craig Lin (San Jose, CA), Tin Pham (San Jose, CA), Bryan Chan (San Francisco, CA), Manasa Peri (Milpitas, CA), Ming Wang (Fremont, CA), Yu Li (Fremont, CA), Hui Du (Milpitas, CA), Xiaojia Zhang (Fremont, CA)
Primary Examiner: Jimmy H Nguyen
Assistant Examiner: Hang Lin
Application Number: 13/893,265
International Classification: G09G 3/34 (20060101); G09G 3/32 (20060101); G02F 1/167 (20060101); G09G 3/20 (20060101);