Downlink control channel signaling in wireless communication systems
A method in a wireless communication device may include receiving a plurality of sub-frames, each sub-frame having time-frequency resource elements, at least one of the sub-frames having a control channel. In some implementations, the plurality of sub-frames forms a continuum of concatenated sub-frames. Each of the plurality of resource allocation fields of the control channel may indicate a resource assignment to the wireless communication device based on a channel quality report, as well as resource assignments in sub-frames of the continuum of concatenated sub-frames. At least one sub-frame of the continuum of concatenated sub-frames may include information indicating that at least some of the resource assignments are frequency diverse.
Latest Google Patents:
The present application is a continuation of co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/466,720, filed Aug. 23, 2006.
FIELD OF THE DISCLOSUREThe present disclosure relates generally to wireless communications and more particularly to downlink control channel signaling over shared channels in wireless communication networks, corresponding entities and methods.
BACKGROUNDIn the Long Term Evolution (LTE) of UMTS Terrestrial Radio Access (UTRA) and UTRA Network (UTRAN) specifications, multiple approaches for scheduling downlink data transmission are being proposed. In particular, time division multiplexing (TDM) and frequency division multiplexing (FDM) methods, including hybrids thereof, have been proposed in addition to separate and joint coding of control channel signaling. In TDM or FDM transmissions of control channel signaling, the control information for downlink and uplink assignments may be transmitted over the first one or two symbols of the downlink frame or may be spread out over the length of a sub-frame, which may be, for example, of 0.5 ms duration, though other values are also possible. In jointly coded downlink and uplink control information schemes, all the control information relates to the sub-frame carrying the control information. A duration field has been proposed to indicate the validity of the current assignment in one sub-frame for subsequent, adjacent sub-frames. All these proposed methods however deal with controlling data transmission based on a sub-frame of 0.5 ms and a transmission time interval (TTI) that is a multiple of 0.5 ms.
The various aspects, features and advantages of the disclosure will become more fully apparent to those having ordinary skill in the art upon careful consideration of the following Detailed Description and the accompanying drawings described below. The drawings may have been simplified for clarity and are not necessarily drawn to scale.
In
Single-carrier based FDMA approaches are attractive in that they improve performance when assessed using contemporary waveform quality metrics, which may include peak-to-average power ratio (PAPR) or the so-called cubic metric (CM). These metrics are good indicators of power backoff or power de-rating necessary to maintain linear power amplifier operation, where “linear” generally means a specified and controllable level of distortion both within the signal bandwidth generally occupied by the desired waveform and in neighboring frequencies. While these SC-FDMA approaches can be classified as single-carrier based transmission schemes with a much lower peak-to-average power ratio than OFDM, they can also be classified as multi-carrier schemes because they are block-oriented like OFDM and can be configured to occupy only a certain set of “sub-carriers” in the frequency domain like OFDM. Thus IFDMA and DFT-SOFDM can be classified as both single-carrier and multi-carrier since they have single carrier characteristics in the time domain and multi-carrier characteristics in the frequency domain. On top of the baseline transmission scheme, the architecture may also include the use of spreading techniques such as direct-sequence CDMA (DS-CDMA), multi-carrier CDMA (MC-CDMA), multi-carrier direct sequence CDMA (MC-DS-CDMA), Orthogonal Frequency and Code Division Multiplexing (OFCDM) with one or two dimensional spreading, or simpler time and frequency division multiplexing/multiple access techniques.
In order to retain the low PAPR or CM property of IFDMA/DFT-SOFDM, only a single IFDMA code could be transmitted by each user which leads to a time division multiplexing (TDM) of pilot or reference symbol blocks, where data and pilots of a particular user are not mixed within the same symbol block. This allows the low PAPR property to be preserved and also enables the pilot to remain orthogonal from the data in multi-path channels, since there is conventionally a cyclic prefix between blocks.
In
Generally, a wireless communication network infrastructure scheduling entity located, for example, in a base station 101, 102 in
In OFDM systems or OFDM like systems such as DFT-SOFDM and IFDMA, a resource allocation is the frequency and time allocation that maps information for a particular UE to sub-carrier resources from a set of available sub-carriers as determined by the scheduler. This allocation may depend, for example, on the frequency-selective channel-quality indication (CQI) reported by the UE to the scheduler. The channel-coding rate and the modulation scheme, which may be different for different portions of the sub-carrier resources, are also determined by the scheduler and may also depend on the reported CQI. In some applications, the UE may not be assigned consecutive sub-carriers. For example, it could be assigned every Qth sub-carrier (equally spaced, non-consecutive) of the entire or a portion of the available system sub-carriers to improve frequency diversity. The available system sub-carriers may be grouped into one or more resource blocks (RB) wherein each resource block comprises the same (common) number of sub-carriers. A resource assignment to a UE can be a resource block or a fraction thereof. More generally, a resource assignment or allocation is a fraction of multiple resource blocks.
In one embodiment, a single TTI has a length of 1 ms or 2 ms wherein the TTI is segmented into two sub-frames each having a 0.5 ms length. Such a construction however implies the need to address multiple resource blocks, i.e., more than the number of resource blocks in a single 0.5 ms sub-frame, unless the resource block (RB) definition is expanded to automatically define the RB as extending over the entire length of the TTI, without regard for the TTI duration. This can lead to inefficiency, however, in the form of excessive per-RB capacity. In case the RB is defined to extend over a fraction of the length of the TTI, it would be possible to independently address each of the resource blocks in the multiple sub-frames making up the TTI. Accordingly mechanisms are required to signal resource assignments in the case of a frame or TTI composed of concatenated sub-frames. Furthermore, mechanisms are required to be able to assign resources based on the needs of individual UE wherein fewer resources are assigned to a UE served smaller packets while more resources are assigned to UE served with larger packets. In the case of UMTS (Universal Mobile Telecommunications System), a TTI is defined as the length of time over which a transmission or transport block is transmitted. A transmission block or transport block is composed of a block of jointly coded data protected by a single CRC. In the present instance, an alternate definition of TTI could be the length of transmission controlled by a single instance of control channel signaling.
In general, it is possible to define resource blocks of varying dimensionality in frequency and time domains to be operational simultaneously. Different terminals can then be signaled as to the resource block sizes that are operational for that particular terminal. For example, a TTI of 1 ms can be defined using two 0.5 ms sub-frames. In one embodiment, a first terminal can be assigned resources in this TTI using resource blocks consisting of 25 contiguous sub-carriers over a length of 1 ms, while a second terminal can be assigned resources using resource blocks consisting of 25 contiguous sub-carriers over a length of 0.5 ms. The former assignment could be useful in the case of terminals being served with data services requiring the transmission of long packets while the latter could be useful in the case of short packet services such as voice. Thus the resources within a single frame consisting of a continuum of concatenated sub-frames are logically divided into prototype or candidate resource blocks, that is, resource blocks of varying sizes super-posed over each other. Different terminals are signaled the assignment of these resource blocks by first pre-assigning the ‘type’ of resource block that is being assigned using higher layer or static signaling and then by dynamically assigning the respective resource block type using the control channel. In one embodiment, the resource blocks all have the same dimensions and are non-overlapping. In another embodiment, resource blocks may be defined in the spatial domain. In such a case, all resource blocks may have identical dimensions (frequency and time) and overlap spatially. SDMA transmission to two or more users in the same resource block may therefore be accomplished. In one embodiment of SDMA, paired (or more than two) users share the same resources in a frame, as the pairing is expected to be appropriate for the frame duration. Such resources may vary from sub-frame to sub-frame within the TTI, but vary in the same fashion to retain the pairing.
In one implementation, a scheduling entity allocates a first radio resource comprising at least one time-frequency resource block of a first minimum size, and allocates a second radio resource comprising at least one time-frequency resource block of a second minimum size, wherein the first and second radio resources are allocated from a common set of time-frequency radio resources. The first and second radio resources are allocated for use by at least one wireless communication terminal during a common transmit time interval constituting at least one sub-frame. More generally, the transmit time interval constitutes a concatenated series of at least two sub-frames. The first and second radio resources may be allocated to a common wireless communication terminal or to different terminals.
In
In some embodiments, the control channel constitutes part of a single frame. In
In one exemplary structure, the first sub-frame can carry control signaling for the downlink while the second carries control signaling for the uplink. This structure permits terminals engaged in data transfer in only one direction to avoid decoding the control channel in the second sub-frame. Individual control channels may be pre-assigned/signaled using the first sub-frame of the radio frame to permit dynamic control channel assignment. This would still permit the use of the control channel resources for data transmission in the event the scheduler does not require the control channel for signaling.
In another embodiment, the first sub-frame of a 1 ms TTI contains control signaling for downlink assignments while the second sub-frame contains control signaling for uplink assignments. The signaling for the uplink assignments may be made in a frequency diverse manner, as it is likely that the network does not have information about the channel conditions experienced by the terminal.
In another embodiment, the resource blocks in a TTI and more generally in a sub-frame making up the TTI can be divided into frequency diverse and frequency non-diverse resource blocks. Such a mapping may be pre-defined based upon the number of such blocks. For example, if 6 of 12 resource blocks are to be frequency diverse, they may comprise every other resource block. Different assignment patterns may also be defined for both frequency diverse and non-diverse resource blocks with the operational pattern being signaled either statically or through higher layer signaling. Frequency diverse allocations may be indicated through a common network environment, for example, system frame number, base station identifier, etc. In some embodiments where the time period between changes of the frequency diverse resource blocks is infrequent, the feedback mechanism, e.g., CQI, for the channel dependent (frequency selective) blocks can be reduced in bandwidth by not sending CQI for frequency diverse resource blocks. In addition, dynamic signaling on the control channel, such as having frequency diverse resource blocks comprise the resource blocks remaining after channel dependent resource allocations are assigned.
Generally, according to one aspect of the disclosure, a control channel provides radio resource allocation information for two or more sub-frames. In one embodiment, the control channel includes a plurality of resource allocation fields, for example, a bit map, wherein each resource allocation field is associated with at least one corresponding sub-frame. In
In another embodiment, a frequency diverse resource assignment is indicated by a frequency diverse allocation field. A frequency diverse resource assignment or allocation is a resource allocation wherein the frequency allocation changes among sub-frames. In
In one implementation, illustrated in
In another embodiment, a frequency diverse allocation field resides on the control channel wherein the frequency diverse allocation field indicates frequency diverse resource allocations in multiple sub-frames of the radio frame. In one embodiment, the frequency diverse allocation field resides on a single control channel, wherein the frequency diverse allocation field indicates frequency diverse resource allocations in multiple sub-frames of the radio frame. In
The allocation corresponding to a particular bit setting or a particular combination of bits may be known a priori by the terminal. In one embodiment, a single bit is used to indicate whether the terminal should use frequency diversity. When a frequency diverse allocation is indicated, the particular allocation may be indicated by some other fields or it may be known a priori. For example, the allocation may be based on the order in which the allocation is made by the scheduler or based upon some other factor or criterion. In one embodiment, the frequency diverse allocation field is a bit map comprising one or more bits. The bits may be used to encode different frequency diverse allocations. In one embodiment, the terminal references a look-up table to determine what frequency diverse allocation corresponds to a particular bit combination.
Additional signaling may indicate any of the following possible resource allocations: The UE is assigned the same resource block in the second (and any subsequent) sub-frame(s) of the TTI; or the resource allocation corresponds to a frequency hopped (diverse) resource block; or there is no further assignment in the frame wherein the term “frame” in this disclosure refers to a multi-sub-frame TTI structure. The above set of enumerated possibilities would require a 2 bit field. Another 2 bit example is to signal, in addition to the resource allocation, the following:
In this example, ‘hopping’ indicates a known method of changing the resource allocation from one sub-frame to another. For example, a fixed cell-specific offset (modulo the number of resource blocks) may be applied to all resource blocks.
More generally, additional control fields may also be used. For example, a single bit could be used to indicate a contiguous assignment or a frequency diverse pattern, and a bitmap could signal the assignment over the TTI wherein the bitmap length is dictated by the number of concatenated sub frames forming the TTI. In this instance, the assignment of a ‘logical’ resource block is applicable, where the mapping, i.e. frequency diversity, between the logical and physical resource block (RB) locations in each component sub-frame of the TTI may be constant, i.e. the mapping defined for the first sub-frame of the TTI remains applicable to subsequent sub-frames, or may vary from sub-frame to sub-frame, where it is understood that the logical assignment is constant and only the mapping varies.
In frequency diverse allocation applications, the idea can be extended even in the case where an odd number of sub-frames, or generally more than 2 sub-frames, make up a TTI. In this case, one bit can indicate whether the assignment includes a frequency diverse allocation pattern, i.e. time-varying logical to physical resource block mapping, or whether the same allocation is being extended over the length of the frame (TTI) in order to optimally support frequency selective or frequency diverse scheduling methods. A separate bitmap can indicate whether the terminal is being assigned a logical resource block in each of the sub-frames making up the TTI regardless of whether frequency diversity is enabled.
In one embodiment, a small set of patterns is assigned statically using higher layer signaling, or semi-statically, and then indexed in the dynamic control using the above mentioned bit-map. In another embodiment, this set of patterns could be made dependent on TTI location in a 10 ms radio frame or similar super frame.
In another embodiment, the frequency diverse allocation pattern can be signaled to be applicable to multiple or all users addressed in a particular TTI. The applicable pattern can be determined based on the order in which the terminal is addressed. Additional signaling may be required to signal which of the embodiments was made operational in the event that more than one scheme is supported.
In some embodiments, it may be more complex to permit one assigned user in the TTI to operate on a frequency diverse allocation while other users do not, since this would require the logical-physical channel mapping to exclude physical resource blocks declared as being assigned to non-frequency diverse users. Accordingly, in some implementations, a single control bit may be asserted which is globally applicable to all users in the sub-frame, and which enables or disables frequency diversity for the entire TTI.
When considering implementations where control information is transmitted on or more of the sub-frames of the TTI, the control information transmission may be made with separate coding or joint coding. With separate coding, a UE's control information is not coded together with another UE's control information. In this case bits indicating an assigned subfield or frequency hopping are added to fields constituting the separate assignment. In some cases, blind decoding of potential allocations (e.g., the UE keeps decoding the RB across additional sub-frames of the TTI until a CRC checks) may be used to reduce signaling. For example, a UE may decode each of a number, e.g. 12, resource blocks looking for a downlink control channel assignment corresponding to that UE. If an assignment is found within a RB, that RB can point to other RBs for a data assignment. This indication of other RBs may be in a number of contiguous RBs or via a bitmap. Blind decoding complexity can be reduced by making the RB with the separate control channel assignment be one of the RBs reported on with channel quality indication information.
Joint coding offers efficient source coding of user IDs and resource allocations, in addition to the addressing and frequency diverse bits of the disclosure. In one embodiment, user IDs are listed in an order that determines a short ID, for example, 2 bits for 4 users. Then, in the order of the available RBs the short IDs (or a null ID) are listed. In one embodiment, two short IDs are assigned per RB. In another embodiment, the 1-2 bits are assigned per ID and associated with the short ID. In this case, every RB to a user is treated in the same manner. In another embodiment, a frequency diverse bit may be sent once per frame, applied to all terminals. In yet another embodiment, retransmissions may be done in an a priori manner requiring less signaling, or signaling only in the first transmission.
While the present disclosure and the best modes thereof have been described in a manner establishing possession and enabling those of ordinary skill to make and use the same, it will be understood and appreciated that there are equivalents to the exemplary embodiments disclosed herein and that modifications and variations may be made thereto without departing from the scope and spirit of the inventions, which are to be limited not by the exemplary embodiments but by the appended claims.
Claims
1. A method in a wireless communication device, the method comprising:
- receiving a plurality of sub-frames, each sub-frame having time-frequency resource elements, at least one of the sub-frames having a control channel, the plurality of sub-frames forming a continuum of concatenated sub-frames;
- the control channel including a plurality of resource allocation fields, each resource allocation field associated with at least one corresponding sub-frame of the plurality of subframes,
- each of the plurality of resource allocation fields indicating a resource assignment to the wireless communication device based on a channel quality report;
- the plurality of resource allocation fields indicating resource assignments in sub-frames of the continuum of concatenated sub-frames;
- a sub-frame of the continuum of concatenated sub-frames including information indicating that at least some of the resource assignments are frequency diverse; and
- allocating, for use by the wireless communication device, frequency diverse resource components based on the information indicating that at least some of the resource assignments are frequency diverse.
2. The method of claim 1, further comprising referencing individual resource assignments in one or more corresponding sub-frames of the continuum of concatenated sub-frames via a look-up table.
3. The method of claim 1, wherein the information indicates that the resource assignments are frequency diverse on the control channel.
4. The method of claim 1, wherein the information indicates that the resource assignments are frequency diverse on signaling other than the control channel.
5. The method of claim 1, wherein the information indicating that the resource assignments are frequency diverse is based on a common network environment.
6. The method of claim 1, wherein the information indicating that the resource assignments are frequency diverse is based on an order of resource allocations to the wireless communication device.
7. The method of claim 1, wherein the information indicating that the resource assignments are frequency diverse is based on sub-frame numbering or on system frame numbering information.
8. The method of claim 1, further comprising receiving a downlink resource assignment in a resource allocation field on a sub-frame that is different than a sub-frame in which a resource allocation field assigning an uplink assignment is received.
9. The method of claim 1, further comprising receiving a mapping of frequency diverse and frequency non-diverse resources in a sub-frame of the continuum of concatenated sub-frames.
10. The method of claim 1, wherein the information indicating that the resource assignments are frequency diverse is a bit map.
11. The method of claim 1, wherein the information indicating that at least some of the resource assignments frequency diverse includes one or more encoded bits in a bit map.
12. The method of claim 1, wherein the control channel contains an assignment of resources that are not indicated as being frequency diverse.
13. The method of claim 1 further comprising sending a channel quality report for resources not including the resources that are indicated as being frequency diverse.
14. A method in a wireless communication device, the method comprising:
- receiving a plurality of sub-frames constituting part of a transmit time interval, each sub-frame having time-frequency resource elements, at least one of the sub-frames having a control channel, the plurality of sub-frames forming a continuum of concatenated sub-frames;
- the control channel including a plurality of resource allocation fields, each resource allocation field associated with at least one corresponding sub-frame of the plurality of subframes,
- each of the plurality of resource allocation fields indicating a resource assignment to the wireless communication device based on a channel quality report;
- the plurality of resource allocation fields indicating resource assignments in sub-frames of the continuum of concatenated sub-frames;
- a sub-frame of the continuum of concatenated sub-frames including information indicating that at least some of the resource assignments are frequency diverse among subframes in the transmit time interval; and
- allocating, for use by the wireless communication device, frequency diverse resource components based on the information indicating that at least some of the resource assignments are frequency diverse among sub-frames in the transit time interval.
| 5177739 | January 5, 1993 | Basnuevo et al. |
| 5396496 | March 7, 1995 | Ito et al. |
| 5530920 | June 25, 1996 | Takeda |
| 5537410 | July 16, 1996 | Li |
| 5732113 | March 24, 1998 | Schmidl et al. |
| 5771226 | June 23, 1998 | Kaku |
| 5784683 | July 21, 1998 | Sistanizadeh et al. |
| 5796726 | August 18, 1998 | Hassan et al. |
| 5991279 | November 23, 1999 | Haugli et al. |
| 6064662 | May 16, 2000 | Gitlin et al. |
| 6115354 | September 5, 2000 | Weck |
| 6130886 | October 10, 2000 | Ketseoglou et al. |
| 6185208 | February 6, 2001 | Liao |
| 6192070 | February 20, 2001 | Poon et al. |
| 6275990 | August 14, 2001 | Dapper et al. |
| 6356555 | March 12, 2002 | Rakib et al. |
| 6535550 | March 18, 2003 | Cole |
| 6549592 | April 15, 2003 | Jones |
| 6567416 | May 20, 2003 | Chuah |
| 6813284 | November 2, 2004 | Vayanos et al. |
| 6827590 | December 7, 2004 | Huss, Jr. et al. |
| 6868519 | March 15, 2005 | Beacken et al. |
| 6876675 | April 5, 2005 | Jones et al. |
| 6885630 | April 26, 2005 | Kostic et al. |
| 6985433 | January 10, 2006 | Laroia et al. |
| 7139239 | November 21, 2006 | McFarland |
| 7142888 | November 28, 2006 | Okawa et al. |
| 7215677 | May 8, 2007 | Lung |
| 7302014 | November 27, 2007 | Barsoum |
| 7366117 | April 29, 2008 | Kim et al. |
| 7426196 | September 16, 2008 | Gopalakrishnan et al. |
| 7522514 | April 21, 2009 | Tzannes et al. |
| 7609697 | October 27, 2009 | Nishida et al. |
| 20010017596 | August 30, 2001 | Strinnholm |
| 20020003773 | January 10, 2002 | Okada et al. |
| 20020031086 | March 14, 2002 | Welin |
| 20020075893 | June 20, 2002 | Gipson et al. |
| 20020118666 | August 29, 2002 | Stanwood et al. |
| 20020119781 | August 29, 2002 | Li et al. |
| 20020122395 | September 5, 2002 | Bourlas et al. |
| 20020126706 | September 12, 2002 | Laroia et al. |
| 20020157060 | October 24, 2002 | Beacken et al. |
| 20030026348 | February 6, 2003 | Llang et al. |
| 20030072255 | April 17, 2003 | Ma et al. |
| 20030090994 | May 15, 2003 | Kakura |
| 20030153276 | August 14, 2003 | Terry et al. |
| 20030171129 | September 11, 2003 | Sagne |
| 20030189918 | October 9, 2003 | Das et al. |
| 20030198179 | October 23, 2003 | Koo et al. |
| 20030202562 | October 30, 2003 | Cai |
| 20040037263 | February 26, 2004 | Zeira |
| 20040042492 | March 4, 2004 | Suzuki et al. |
| 20040047296 | March 11, 2004 | Tzannes et al. |
| 20040071222 | April 15, 2004 | Liang et al. |
| 20040082356 | April 29, 2004 | Walton et al. |
| 20040085934 | May 6, 2004 | Balachandran et al. |
| 20040087320 | May 6, 2004 | Kim et al. |
| 20040095907 | May 20, 2004 | Agee et al. |
| 20040116079 | June 17, 2004 | Kim et al. |
| 20040162075 | August 19, 2004 | Malladi et al. |
| 20040213145 | October 28, 2004 | Nakamura |
| 20050018754 | January 27, 2005 | Song |
| 20050030927 | February 10, 2005 | Mucke |
| 20050053088 | March 10, 2005 | Cheng et al. |
| 20050068973 | March 31, 2005 | Taffin et al. |
| 20050099936 | May 12, 2005 | Fujii et al. |
| 20050111397 | May 26, 2005 | Attar et al. |
| 20050135295 | June 23, 2005 | Walton et al. |
| 20050153276 | July 14, 2005 | Wikswo et al. |
| 20050232181 | October 20, 2005 | Park et al. |
| 20060007881 | January 12, 2006 | Kondo |
| 20060039409 | February 23, 2006 | Lampinen |
| 20060106600 | May 18, 2006 | Bessette |
| 20060176966 | August 10, 2006 | Stewart et al. |
| 20060187895 | August 24, 2006 | Nandagopalan |
| 20060245384 | November 2, 2006 | Talukdar et al. |
| 20070058595 | March 15, 2007 | Classon et al. |
| 20070064669 | March 22, 2007 | Classon et al. |
| 20070066362 | March 22, 2007 | Ma et al. |
| 20070133695 | June 14, 2007 | Kotzin |
| 20070159993 | July 12, 2007 | Classon et al. |
| 20070211657 | September 13, 2007 | McBeath et al. |
| 20070214400 | September 13, 2007 | Smith et al. |
| 20070242653 | October 18, 2007 | Yang |
| 20070274203 | November 29, 2007 | Kimura et al. |
| 20080043708 | February 21, 2008 | Muharemovic et al. |
| 20080049690 | February 28, 2008 | Kuchibhotla et al. |
| 20080077837 | March 27, 2008 | Lohr et al. |
| 20080084845 | April 10, 2008 | Kuchibhotla et al. |
| 20080137562 | June 12, 2008 | Li et al. |
| 20080240022 | October 2, 2008 | Yoon et al. |
| 20080247337 | October 9, 2008 | Li et al. |
| 20090034486 | February 5, 2009 | Takahashi et al. |
| 20090245188 | October 1, 2009 | Fukuoka et al. |
| 20090264076 | October 22, 2009 | Nogami et al. |
| 20090268695 | October 29, 2009 | Zhao et al. |
| 20100260137 | October 14, 2010 | Vrzic et al. |
| 20100316014 | December 16, 2010 | Choi et al. |
| 1379020 | January 2004 | EP |
| 1450505 | October 2008 | EP |
| 2322525 | August 1998 | GB |
| 11-355195 | December 1999 | JP |
| 9211716 | July 1992 | WO |
| 0116314 | March 2001 | WO |
| 0241520 | May 2002 | WO |
| 0249305 | June 2002 | WO |
| 03077457 | September 2003 | WO |
| 2004039011 | May 2004 | WO |
| 2004039027 | May 2004 | WO |
| 2004042954 | May 2004 | WO |
| 2004073250 | August 2004 | WO |
| 2004097797 | November 2004 | WO |
| 2004100569 | November 2004 | WO |
| 2004105294 | December 2004 | WO |
| 2005109705 | November 2005 | WO |
| 2006039812 | April 2006 | WO |
| 2006065069 | June 2006 | WO |
| 2006083077 | August 2006 | WO |
| 2006102746 | October 2006 | WO |
| 2006105004 | October 2006 | WO |
| 2006105005 | October 2006 | WO |
- Yaghoobi; Intel Technology Journal, vol. 08, Issue 03, Published, Aug. 20, 2004; ISSN 1535-864X; “Scalable OFDMA Physical Layer in IEEE 802.16 WirelessMAN”; p. 207.
- 3GPP TSG RAN1#45, Shanghai, China, May 8-12, 2006; EUTRA Downlink Distributed Multiplexing and Mapping Rules TP; R1-061173; XP007903801.
- IEEE 802.16 REVd/D5-2004, “Part 16: Air Interface for Fixed Broadband Wireless Access System”, May 2004; also known as IEEE Std 80216-2004.
- IEEE 802.16e “Extended rtPS for VoIP services” dated Nov. 4, 2004.
- 3GPP TSG-RAN WG1 Meeting #52; Sorrento, Italy; Feb. 11-15, 2008; 36.211 CR 0003; “Update of uplink reference-signal hopping, downlink reference signals, scrabling sequences, DwPTS/UpPTS lengths to TDD and control channel processing” R1-081155.
- 3GPP TSG RAN2#55; Seoul, Korea, Oct. 9-13, 2006; Agenda 13.2 “Downlink Resource Allocation” R2-062970.
- 3GPP TS 36.211 v8.7.0 (May 2009) 3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network; Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (E-UTRA); Physical Channels and Modulation (Release 8).
- TS 25.322, “Radio Link Control (RLC) Protocol Specification”, Version 6.2.0, Dec. 2004.
- 3GPP2 C.S0017-010-A, “Data Service Options for Spread Spectrum Systems: Radio Link Protocol Type 3”, version 1.0, Jun. 2004.
- 3rd Generation Partnership Project 2, 3GPP2, “cdma2000 High Rate Packet Data Air Interface Specification”, 3GPP2 C.s0024-A Version 1.0 Mar. 2004, pp. 3-27 to 3-31, 13-1 to 13-13, 13-25 to 13-52.
- Classon et al., “Multi-dimensional Adaptation and Multi-user Scheduling Techniques for Wireless OFDM Systems,” in Proc. IEEE ICC 2003, pp. 2251-2255, May 2003.
- IEEE Std 802.16-2004 (Revision of IEEE Std 802.16-2001), 802.16 IEEE Standard for Local and metropolitan area networks, Part 16: Air Interface for Fixed Broadband Wireless Access Systems, IEEE Computer Society and the IEEE Microwave Theory and Techniques.
- Das et al, “A2IR: an asynchronous and adaptive hybrid ARQ scheme for 3G evolution”, Vehicular Technology Conference, 2001, VTC 2001 Spring, IEEE VTS 53 vol. 1, May 6-9, 2001, pp. 628-632, vol. 1.
- Das et al, “Performance of hybrid ARQ for high speed downlink packet access in UMTS”, Vehicular Technology Conference, 2001, VTCX 2001 Fall, IEEE VTS 54 vol. 4, Oct. 7-11, 2001, pp. 2133-2137, vol. 4.
- Das et al, “Adaptive, asynchronous incremental redundancy (A/sup 2/IR) with fixed transmission time intercals (TTI) for HSDPA”, Personal Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications, 2002, The 13th IEEE International Symposium on vol. 3, Sep. 15-18.
- 3rd Generation Partnership Project 2, 3GPP2, Physical Layer Standard for cdma2000 Spread Spectrum System, Revision D, 3GPP2 C.S0002-D, Version 1.0 Feb. 13, 2004, pp. 3-3, 3-15, 3-21, 3-131, to 3-140.
- Motorola: “Layer 1 Data Transfer: Formats and Definitions”, Agenda Item 6.2, R2-060122, 3GPP TSG RAN WG2 #50, Sophia Antipolis, France, Jan. 9-13, 2006, all pages.
- Siemens: “Signaling for downlink scheculing: Dynamic allocation of distributed and localized configuration with no signaling”, R1-060835, EGPP TSG RAN WG1:44bis, Athens, Greece, Mar. 27-31, 2006, all pages.
- Intel Technology Journal, IEEE 802.16 Medium Access Control and Service Provisioning; Aug. 20, 2004.
- State Intellectual Property Office of the People'S Republic of China, Notification of the First Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 200780038478.1, mailed Jul. 25, 2011.
- State Intellectual Property Office of the People'S Republic of China, Notification of the First Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 201110409544.X, mailed Dec. 4, 2013.
- State Intellectual Property Office of the People'S Republic of China, Notification of the First Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 201110409544.X, mailed Jun. 30, 2014.
- Government of India Patent Office, First Examination Report for Indian Patent Application No. 725/KOLNP/2009, mailed Feb. 19, 2014.
- Japan Patent Office, Notification of Reasons for Rejection for Japanese Patent Application No. 2007-216057, mailed Nov. 24, 2009.
- Japan Patent Office, Decision of Rejection for Japanese Patent Application No. 2007-216057, mailed Dec. 21, 2010.
- Japan Patent Office, Notification of Reasons for Rejection for Japanese Patent Application No. 2011-095291, mailed Oct. 10, 2012.
- Japan Patent Office, Notification of Reasons for Rejection for Japanese Patent Application No. 2011-095291, mailed Jun. 25, 2013.
- Korean Intellectual Property Office, Preliminary Rejection for Korean Patent Application No. 10-2009-7005772, mailed Oct. 21, 2010.
- The Federal Service for Intellectual Property, Patents and Trademarks, Official Action for Russian Patent Application No. 2009110200/09(013844), mailed Mar. 30, 2011.
- United States Patent and Trademark Office, International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2006/014232, mailed Jan. 29, 2007.
- United States Patent and Trademark Office, International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2006/011080, mailed Sep. 27, 2006.
- United States Patent and Trademark Office, International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2006/011079, mailed Nov. 20, 2006.
- United States Patent and Trademark Office, International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2007/061297, mailed Nov. 1, 2007.
- European PatentOffice, International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2006/000211, mailed Apr. 26, 2006.
- European PatentOffice, International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2007/076941, mailed Aug. 21, 2008.
- European PatentOffice, International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2007/074064, mailed Mar. 14, 2008.
Type: Grant
Filed: Feb 14, 2013
Date of Patent: Feb 23, 2016
Patent Publication Number: 20130156002
Assignee: Google Technology Holdings LLC (Mountain View, CA)
Inventors: Ravi Kuchibhotla (Gurnee, IL), Brian K. Classon (Palatine, IL), Robert T. Love (Barrington, IL), Ravikiran Nory (Buffalo Grove, IL), Philippe J. Sartori (Algonquin, IL), Kenneth A. Stewart (Grayslake, IL), Yakun Sun (Evanston, IL), Anup K. Talukdar (Schaumburg, IL)
Primary Examiner: Otis L Thompson, Jr.
Application Number: 13/766,980
International Classification: H04W 4/00 (20090101); H04W 72/04 (20090101); H04L 27/26 (20060101); H04B 7/26 (20060101);
