Device for producing non-hydrated purified hydrogen peroxide gas

- Synexis LLC
Skip to: Description  ·  Claims  ·  References Cited  · Patent History  ·  Patent History
Description

FIG. 1 is a perspective view of one embodiment of a device for producing PHPG.

FIG. 2 is a second perspective view of the device of FIG. 1.

FIG. 3 is a front view of the device of FIG. 1.

FIG. 4 is a back view of device of FIG. 1.

FIG. 5 is a right hand side view of the device of FIG. 1.

FIG. 6 is a left hand side view of the device of FIG. 1.

FIG. 7 is a top view of the device of FIG. 1.

FIG. 8 a bottom view of the device of FIG. 1; and,

FIG. 9 is an exploded view of the device of FIG. 1 showing a filter, a fan unit, an adapter, and a DHP gas generating assembly for ease of illustration.

The broken lines show portions of the design that form no part of the claimed design.

Also, in reference to “perspective,” “front,” “back,” “side,” and “top” in the Figure Descriptions are not necessarily meant to require any specific orientation of the article as viewed. A device for producing PHPG according to the claimed design may be used in any orientation.

Claims

The ornamental design for a device for producing non-hydrated purified hydrogen peroxide gas, as shown and described.

Referenced Cited
U.S. Patent Documents
3364037 January 1968 Mink et al.
3557536 January 1971 Ririe
4045525 August 30, 1977 Huggins
4172105 October 23, 1979 Miller
D263496 March 23, 1982 Kimball
D264375 May 11, 1982 Prikkel, III
D295674 May 10, 1988 Ogasawara
D331961 December 22, 1992 Ridolfi
5329939 July 19, 1994 Howe
5410958 May 2, 1995 Schritz
D393705 April 21, 1998 Dure
D437401 February 6, 2001 Ramos
6797027 September 28, 2004 Stenersen
D577109 September 16, 2008 Smith
D587360 February 24, 2009 Sakairi
D587361 February 24, 2009 Sakairi
7971862 July 5, 2011 Kanda
D651702 January 3, 2012 Kathoefer
8168122 May 1, 2012 Lee
8337577 December 25, 2012 Moe
8685329 April 1, 2014 Lee
D735311 July 28, 2015 Horiguchi
D735312 July 28, 2015 Horiguchi
D735313 July 28, 2015 Horiguchi
D754312 April 19, 2016 Ellis
D822191 July 3, 2018 Sidawi
20010046500 November 29, 2001 Jongsma et al.
20040175391 September 9, 2004 Schasteen et al.
20050044825 March 3, 2005 Bazzarella
20050051104 March 10, 2005 Wolfe
20060210674 September 21, 2006 Ruff et al.
20070210463 September 13, 2007 Koenig
20070245973 October 25, 2007 Huisinga et al.
20090007853 January 8, 2009 Johnson et al.
20100150958 June 17, 2010 Sheppard
20130094999 April 18, 2013 Army
20130116174 May 9, 2013 Hargis et al.
20140238308 August 28, 2014 Foreman et al.
20150083051 March 26, 2015 Foreman et al.
20150313964 November 5, 2015 Cook et al.
Foreign Patent Documents
2 644 282 October 2013 EP
WO 2009/021108 February 2009 WO
WO 2010/093796 August 2010 WO
WO 2012/161685 November 2012 WO
WO 2014/186805 November 2014 WO
WO 2015/026958 February 2015 WO
WO 2015/171633 November 2015 WO
WO 2016/172223 October 2016 WO
WO 2016/176486 November 2016 WO
Other references
  • Adams, “Vector Abatement Plan—Darkling Beetles,” CAMM Poultry, Chapter 10c: 10.c.1-10.c.12 (2003), in U.S. Appl. Nos. 15/866,198 and 15/866,208.
  • Agalloco et al., “Overcoming Limitations of Vaporized Hydrogen Peroxide,” Pharmaceutical Technology, 37(9):1-7 (2013), in U.S. Appl. Nos. 15/866,198 and 15/866,208.
  • Bailey et al., “Effect of Hatching Cabinet Sanitation Treatments on Salmonella Cross-Contamination and Hatchability of Broiler Eggs,” Poult Sci. 75(2):191-6 (1996), in U.S. Appl. Nos. 15/866,198 and 15/866,208.
  • Bakst et al., “Impact of Egg Storage on Embryo Development,” Proceedings of the International Congress on Bird Reproduction 125-131 (1999), in U.S. Appl. Nos. 15/866,198 and 15/866,208.
  • Bauer et al., “Output and Aerosol Properties of 5 Nebulizer/Compressor Systems with Arformoterol Inhalation Solution,” Respiratory Care, 54(10):1342-1347 (2009), in U.S. Appl. Nos. 15/866,198 and 15/866,208.
  • Bergoug, “Effect of pre-incubation and incubation conditions in hatchability, hatch time and hatch window, and effect of post hatch handling on chick quality at placement,” World's Poultry Science Journal, (2013), in U.S. Appl. Nos. 15/866,198 and 15/866,208.
  • Berrang et al., “Hatching Egg Sanitization for Prevention or Reduction of Human Enteropathogens: A Review,” J. Appl. Poul Res. 279-284 (2000), in U.S. Appl. Nos. 15/866,198 and 15/866,208.
  • Bialka et al., “Efficacy of Electrolyzed Oxidizing Water for the Microbial Safety and Quality of Eggs,” Poultry Science 83:2071-2078 (2004), in U.S. Appl. Nos. 15/866,198 and 15/866,208.
  • Boerjan, “Programs for Single Stage Incubation and Chick Quality,” Avian Poultry Biology Reviews 13:237-238 (2002), in U.S. Appl. Nos. 15/866,198 and 15/866,208.
  • Boerjan, “Incubation for Uniformity,” Aust. Poult. Sci. Symp, 18:174-181 (2006), in U.S. Appl. Nos. 15/866,198 and 15/866,208.
  • Boerjan, “A practical interpretation of ‘physiological zero’ in hatchery management,” Pas Reform Incubation Guide 5.2 or 6.0 (2016), in U.S. Appl. Nos. 15/866,198 and 15/866,208.
  • Bourassa et al., “Elevated Egg Holding-Room Temperature of 74° F. (23°C. ) Does Not Depress Hatchability or Chick Quality,” JAPR: Research Report, Poultry Science Association, Inc. (2003), in U.S. Appl. Nos. 15/866,198 and 15/866,208.
  • Butcher et al., “A Systematic Approach to Solving Hatchability and Chick Quality Problems,” IFAS Extension, University of Florida, VM136:1-3 (2002), in U.S. Appl. Nos. 15/866,198 and 15/866,208.
  • Carver, “Internal Parasites,” downloaded from https://www.ces.ncsu.edu/depts/poulsci/tech_manuals/internal_parasites.pdf (2014), in U.S. Appl. Nos. 15/866,198 and 15/866,208.
  • Choi et al., “Reduction of Salmonella enterica on the surface of eggshells by sequential treatment with aqueous chlorine dioxide and drying,” Int. J. Food Microbiol. 210:84-87 (2015), in U.S. Appl. Nos. 15/866,198 and 15/866,208.
  • Christensen et al., “Investigations into the survival of Mycoplasma gallisepticum, Mycoplasma synoviae and Mycoplasma iowae on materials found in the poultry house environment,” Avian Pathol. 23(1):127-43 (1994), in U.S. Appl. Nos. 15/866,198 and 15/866,208.
  • Clark, “Two New Programs: Premises Identification and the National Animal Identification and the National Animal Identification System,” Avian Advice, 7(2) (2005), in U.S. Appl. Nos. 15/866,198 and 15/866,208.
  • Cornelison et al., “Effects of Water Acidification on Turkey Performance,” Avian Advice, 7(2) (2005), in U.S. Appl. Nos. 15/866,198 and 15/866,208.
  • Cox et al., “Bactericidal Treatment of Hatching Eggs I. Chemical Immersion Treatments and Salmonella,” J. Applied Poultry Res. 347-350 (1998), in U.S. Appl. Nos. 15/866,198 and 15/866,208.
  • Cox et al., “Bactericidal Treatment of hatching Eggs II. Use of Chemical Disinfectants with Vacuum to Reduce Salmonella,” J. Applied Poutry Res. 321-326 (1999), in U.S. Appl. Nos. 15/866,198 and 15/866,208.
  • Cox et al. “Bactericidal Treatment of Hatching Eggs IV. Hydrogen Peroxide Applied with Vacuum and a Surfactant to Eliminate Salmonella from Hatching Eggs,” J. Appl. Poult. Res. 9:530-534 (2000), in U.S. Appl. Nos. 15/866,198 and 15/866,208.
  • Cox et al., “Salmonella penetration of egg shells and proliferation in broiler hatching eggs—a review,” Poult. Sci 79(11):1571-4 (2000), in U.S. Appl. Nos. 15/866,198 and 15/866,208.
  • Cox et al., “Bactericidal Treatment of Hatching Eggs V: Efficiency of Repetitive Immersions in Hydrogen Peroxide or Phenol to Eliminate Salmonella from Hatching Eggs,” J. Appl. Poult. Res. 11(3):328-331 (2002), in U.S. Appl. Nos. 15/866,198 and 15/866,208.
  • Decuypere et al., “The Endocrine Interface of Environmental and Egg Factors Affecting Chick Quality,” Poult. Sci 86(5):1037-42 (2007), in U.S. Appl. Nos. 15/866,198 and 15/866,208.
  • DeLoach et al., “Northern fowl mite, Ornithonyssus sylviarum (Acari: Macronyssidae) ingests large amounts of blood from white Leghorn hens,” J. Med. Entomol. 18:374-377 (1981), in U.S. Appl. Nos. 15/866,198 and 15/866,208.
  • Elibol et al., “Effect of Egg Weight and Position Relative to Incubator Fan on Broiler Hatchability and Chick Quality,” Poultry Science, 1913-1918 (2008), in U.S. Appl. Nos. 15/866,198 and 15/866,208.
  • “Epidemiologic and Other Analyses of HPAI-Affected Poultry Flocks: Jun. 15, 2015 Report,” (2015), in U.S. Appl. Nos. 15/866,198 and 15/866,208.
  • Ernst, “Hatching Egg Sanitation: The Key Step in Successful Storage and Production,” ANR Publication 8120 (2004) available on the Web at anrcatalog.ucanr.edu/pdf/8120.pdf, in U.S. Appl. Nos. 15/866,198 and 15/866,208.
  • Ernst, “Common Incubation Problems: Causes and Remedies,” ANR Publication 8127 (2004), in U.S. Appl. Nos. 15/866,198 and 15/866,208.
  • Fasenko, “Egg Storage and the Embry,” Embryo Symposium, 1020-1024 (2001), in U.S. Appl. Nos. 15/866,198 and 15/866,208.
  • French, “Managing the Incubation Environment in Commercial Hatcheries to Meet the Requirements of the Embryo,” Proceedings of the International Congress on Bird Reproduction 179-185 (1999), in U.S. Appl. Nos. 15/866,198 and 15/866,208.
  • “Hatchery Production 2015 Summary,” USDA ISSN:1949-1976 (2016), in U.S. Appl. No. 15/866,198 and 15/866,208.
  • Henderson et al., “On-Farm Egg-Holding Temperatures for Commercial Broiler Breeders,” Avidan Advice 8(1):3-6 (2006), in U.S. Appl. Nos. 15/866,198 and 15/866,208.
  • Huff et al., “Bacteriophage: A Replacement for Antibiotics?,” Avian Advice 7(2) (2005), in U.S. Appl. Nos. 15/866,198 and 15/866,208.
  • Hughes et al., “Chlorination/Acidification Affects Salmonella Contamination,” Avian Advice 11(2) (2009), in U.S. Appl. Nos. 15/866,198 and 15/866,208.
  • Humphrey et al., “Numbers of Salmonella enteritidis in the contents of naturally contaminated hens' eggs,” Epidemiol. Infect. 106(3):489-496 (1991), in U.S. Appl. Nos. 15/866,198 and 15/866,208.
  • Humphrey et al., “Salmonella enteritidis Phage Type 4 Isolates More Tolerant of Heat, Acid, or Hydrogen Peroxide Also Survive Longer on Surfaces,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology 61(8):3161-3164 (1995), in U.S. Appl. Nos. 15/866,198 and 15/866,208.
  • Hsieh et al., “Hydrogen peroxide treatment of eggshell membrane to control porosity,” Food Chem. 141(3):2117-2121 (2013), in U.S. Appl. Nos. 15/866,198 and 15/866,208.
  • Ipek et al., “Broiler Chick Quality and Scoring Methods,” Journal of Agricultural Faculty of Uludag Unversity, (2013), in U.S. Appl. Nos. 15/866,198 and 15/866,208.
  • Jones et al., “What are Bacteriophages?” Avian Advice 7(2) (2005), in U.S. Appl. Nos. 15/866,198 and 15/866,208.
  • Kahnert et al., “Decontamination with vaporized hydrogen peroxide is effective against Mycobacterium tuberculosis,” Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 40(6):448-52 (2005), in U.S. Appl. Nos. 15/866,198 and 15/866,208.
  • Kim et al., “Inactivation of Salmonella on Eggshells by Chlorine Dioxide Gas,” Korean J. Food Sci. Anim. Resour. 36(1):100-108 (2016), U.S. Appl. Nos. 15/866,198 and 15/866,208.
  • McDougald, Protozoal Infections. In: Diseases of Poultry (ed. Saif YM), Iowa State Press, pp. 973-1026 (2003), in U.S. Appl. Nos. 15/866,198 and 15/866,208.
  • Mitchell et al., “Reducing Airborne Pathogens, Dust and Salmonella Transmission in Experimental hatching Cabinets Using an Electrostatic Space Charge System,” Poultry Science 81:49-55 (2002), in U.S. Appl. Nos. 15/866,198 and 15/866,208.
  • Molenaar, “Evaluation of Chick Quality, Which Method Do You Choose?” Hatch Tech B.V. (2011), in U.S. Appl. Nos. 15/866,198 and 15/866,208.
  • Mu et al., “Biphasic regulation of H2O2 on angiogenesis implicated NADPH oxidase,” Cell Biol. Int. 34(10):1013-1020 (2010), in U.S. Appl. Nos. 15/866,198 and 15/866,208.
  • Mueller-Doblies et al. “A comparison of the efficacy of different disinfection methods in eliminating Salmonella contamination from turkey houses,” J. Appl. Microbiol. 109(2):471-479 (2010), in U.S. Appl. Nos. 15/866,198 and 15/866,208.
  • Naas et al., “Estimating the Impact of Environmental Conditions on Hatching Results Using Multivariable Analysis,” Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science 10(4):215-222 (2008), in U.S. Appl. Nos. 15/866,198 and 15/866,208.
  • Oosterik et al., “Disinfection by hydrogen peroxide nebulization increases susceptibility to avian pathogenic Escherichia coli,” BMC Res. Notes. 8:378 (2015), in U.S. Appl. Nos. 15/866,198 and 15/866,208.
  • Padron, “Egg dipping in hydrogen peroxide solution to eliminate Salmonella typhimurium from eggshell membranes,” Avian Dis. 39(3):627-30 (1995), in U.S. Appl. Nos. 15/866,198 and 15/866,208.
  • Park et al., “Inactivation of Salmonella enterica in chicken feces on the surface of eggshells by simultaneous treatments with gaseous chlorine dioxide and mild wet heat,” Food Microbiol. 62:202-206 (2017), in U.S. Appl. Nos. 15/866,198 and 15/866,208.
  • Parkhurst et al., “Incubation and Hatchery Management,” Poultry Meat and Egg Production 65-66 (1988), in U.S. Appl. Nos. 15/866,198 and 15/866,208.
  • Parks, “The Relationship Between Saturated Hydrogen Peroxide, Water Vapour and Temperature,” Pharmaceutical Technology Europe (2004), U.S. Appl. Nos. 15/866,198 and 15/866,208.
  • Patterson et al., “A respiratory chain controlled signal transduction cascade in the mitochondrial intermembrane space mediates hydrogen peroxide signaling,” PNAS E5679-E5688 (2015), in U.S. Appl. Nos. 15/866,198 and 15/866,208.
  • Payne et al., “Evaluation of Litter Treatments on Salmonella Recovery in Poultry Litter,” Avian Advice 7(2) (2005), in U.S. Appl. Nos. 15/866,198 and 15/866,208.
  • Poultry—Production and Value 2015 Summary, USDA ISSN:1949-1073 (2016), in U.S. Appl. Nos. 15/866,198 and 15/866,208.
  • Proudfoot et al., “Care of Hatching Eggs Before Incubation,” Agriculture Canada, Publication 1573/E (1990), in U.S. Appl. Nos. 15/866,198 and 15/866,208.
  • Reijrink et al., “Influence of prestorage incubation on embryonic development, hatchability, and chick quality,” Poultry Science 88:2649-2660 (2009), in U.S. Appl. Nos. 15/866,198 and 15/866,208.
  • Reijrink et al., “Influence of egg storage time and preincubation warming profile on embryonic development, hatchability, and chick quality,” Poultry Science 89:1225-1238 (2010), in U.S. Appl. Nos. 15/866,198 and 15/866,208.
  • Reijrink et al., “Influence of air composition during egg storage on egg characteristics, embryonic development, hatchability, and chick quality,” Poultry Science 89:1992-2000 (2010), in U.S. Appl. Nos. 15/866,198 and 15/866,208.
  • Reijrink et al., “Influence of egg warming during storage and hypercapnic incubation on egg characteristics, embryonic development, hatchability, and chick quality,” Poultry Science 89:2470-2483 (2010), in U.S. Appl. Nos. 15/866,198 and 15/866,208.
  • Russell, “The Effect of Electrolyzed Oxidative Water Applied Using Electrostatic Spraying on Pathogenic and Indicator Bacteria on the Surface of Eggs,” Poultry Science 82:158-162 (2003), in U.S. Appl. Nos. 15/866,198 and 15/866,208.
  • Sander et al., “Effect of hydrogen peroxide disinfection during incubation of chicken eggs on microbial levels and productivity,” Avian Dis. 43(2):227-33 (1999), in U.S. Appl. Nos. 15/866,198 and 15/866,208.
  • Sheldon et al., “Hydrogen peroxide as an alternative hatching egg disinfectant,” Poult. Sci. 70(5):1092-8 (1991), in U.S. Appl. Nos. 15/866,198 and 15/866,208.
  • Soares, et al., “Reduced productivity among confined laying hens infested by Allopsoroptoides galli (Mironov, 2013),” Poult. Sci. 95(4):819-22 (2016), in U.S. Appl. Nos. 15/866,198 and 15/866,208.
  • Spray Sanitizing Hatching Eggs from the North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service available on the Web downloaded from www.ces.ncsu.edu/depts/poulsci/tech_manuals/spray_sanitizing.html (2018), in U.S. Appl. Nos. 15/866,198 and 15/866,208.
  • Strother, “Poultry pest management,” Publ. No. ARN-483. Alabama Cooperative Extension System. Auburn University (2008), in U.S. Appl. Nos. 15/866,198 and 15/866,208.
  • Summers, “Hydrogen Peroxide H2O2,” Poultry Industry Counsel Fact Sheet #12, Hydrogen peroxide Poultry Industry Council of Canada (1991), in U.S. Appl. Nos. 15/866,198 and 15/866,208.
  • Tabler et al., “Arkansas Turkey Growers Face Variety of Challenges,” Avian Advice 6(1) (2004), in U.S. Appl. Nos. 15/866,198 and 15/866,208.
  • Tabler et al., “Mortality Patterns Associated with Commercial Broiler Production,” Avian Advice, 6(1):1-3 (2004), in U.S. Appl. Nos. 15/866,198 and 15/866,208.
  • Tabler et al., “Odor and Air Emissions From Poultry Facilities,” Avian Advice 6(1) (2004), in U.S. Appl. Nos. 15/866,198 and 15/866,208.
  • Tabler et al., “Odor—An Emerging Concern for Producers,” Avian Advice 8(1) (2006), in U.S. Appl. Nos. 15/866,198 and 15/866,208.
  • Tabler, “Factors Affecting Turkey Flock Performance,” Avian Advice 8(1) (2006), in U.S. Appl. Nos. 15/866,198 and 15/866,208.
  • Tabler, “Farm Animal Welfare Issues Affect Poultry Producers,” Avian Advice 8(1) (2006), in U.S. Appl. Nos. 15/866,198 and 15/866,208.
  • Tabler, “A 100-Flock Comparison of Broiler Feed Ticket Weights and On-Farm Feed Weights at the ABRF,” Avian Advice 11(2) (2009), in U.S. Appl. Nos. 15/866,198 and 15/866,208.
  • Tabler et al., “Poultry Litter Production and Associated Challenges,” Avian Advice 11(2) (2009), in U.S. Appl. Nos. 15/866,198 and 15/866,208.
  • Tona et al., “Effects of Egg Storage Time on Spread of Hatch, Chick Quality, and Chick Juvenile Growth,” Poultry Science 82:736-741 (2003), in U.S. Appl. Nos. 15/866,198 and 15/866,208.
  • “U.S. Broiler and Egg Production Cycles,” NASS Factor Finders for Agriculture, United Statements Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC (2005), in U.S. Appl. Nos. 15/866,198 and 15/866,208.
  • van de Ven et al., “Significance of chick quality score in broiler production,” Animal 6(10):1677-1683 (2012), in U.S. Appl. Nos. 15/866,198 and 15/866,208.
  • Vezzoli et al., “The effect of northern fowl mite (Ornithonyssus sylviarum) infestation on hen physiology, physical condition, and egg quality,” Poult. Sci. 95(5):1042-9 (2016), in U.S. Appl. Nos. 15/866,198 and 15/866,208.
  • Walker, “Parasite Control in Poultry,” Melbourne Bird Veterinary Clinic (2015), in U.S. Appl. Nos. 15/866,198 and 15/866,208.
  • Walls et al., “Effects fo Incubation Delay on Viability and Microbial Growth of Wood Duck (aix sponsa) Eggs,” The Auk 128:(4):663.670 (2011), in U.S. Appl. Nos. 15/866,198 and 15/866,208.
  • Wan et al, “Differential Gene Expression Patterns in Chicken Cardiomyocytes during Hydrogen Peroxide-Induced Apoptosis,” PLoS One 11(1):e0147950 (2016), in U.S. Appl. Nos. 15/866,198 and 15/866,208.
  • Warin, “Embryonic Development,” Ceva Animal Health Asia Pacific Newsletter, issue 7 (2006), in U.S. Appl. Nos. 15/866,198 and 15/866,208.
  • Watkins et al., “Water Sanitation: Evaluation of Products,” Avian Advice 6(1) (2004), in U.S. Appl. Nos. 15/866,198 and 15/866,208.
  • Watkins et al., “Broiler Water Consumption,” Avian Advice 11(2) (2009), in U.S. Appl. Nos. 15/866,198 and 15/866,208.
  • Wells et al., “Disinfection of eggshells using ultraviolet light and hydrogen peroxide independently and in combination,” Poult Sci. 89(11):2499-505 (2010), in U.S. Appl. Nos. 15/866,198 and 15/866,208.
  • Wells et al., “Hatchability of Broiler Breeder Eggs Sanitized with a Combination of Ultraviolet Light and Hydrogen Peroxide,” International Journal of Poultry Science 10(4):320-324 (2011), in U.S. Appl. Nos. 15/866,198 and 15/866,208.
  • Whistler et al., “Biocidal Activity of Ozone Versus Formaldehyde Against Poultry Pathogens Inoculated in a Prototype Setter,” Poultry Science 68:1068-1073 (1989), in U.S. Appl. Nos. 15/866,198 and 15/866,208.
  • Willemsen et al., “Critical Assessment of Chick Quality Measurements as in Indicator of Posthatch Performance,” Poultry Science 87:2358-2366 (2008), in U.S. Appl. Nos. 15/866,198 and 15/866,208.
  • Wilson, “Hatching Egg Sanitation,” University of Florida, IFAS Extension, PS22 (2003), in U.S. Appl. Nos. 15/866,198 and 15/866,208.
  • Wineland et al., “Microbiological Monitoring for a Hatchery QA Program,” Poultry Science Facts from North Carolina State University at Raleigh/Extension Poultry Science (1992), in U.S. Appl. Nos. 15/866,198 and 15/866,208.
  • Wineland, “Contamination of Hatching Eggs,” Poultry Science Facts #21 (1996), in U.S. Appl. Nos. 15/866,198 and 15/866,208.
  • Zhang et al., “A Highly Sensitive and Selective Hydrogen Peroxide Biosensor Based on Gold Nanoparticles and Three-Dimensional Porous Carbonized Chicken Eggshell Membrane,” PLOS One 1-14 (2015), in U.S. Appl. Nos. 15/866,198 and 15/866,208.
  • Zheng et al., “Airborne bacterial reduction by spraying slightly acidic electrolyzed water in a laying-hen house,” Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association 63(10):1205/1211 (2013), in U.S. Appl. Nos. 15/866,198 and 15/866,208.
Patent History
Patent number: D890898
Type: Grant
Filed: Jan 31, 2018
Date of Patent: Jul 21, 2020
Assignee: Synexis LLC (Kansas City, MO)
Inventors: Garrett Nibbelink (Overland Park, KS), Brandon Lager (Olathe, KS), Pedro Bermudez (Olathe, KS), James D. Lee (Kansas City, MO), Douglas J. Bosma (Armonk, NY)
Primary Examiner: Nathan M Johnston
Application Number: 29/635,531
Classifications
Current U.S. Class: Air Treatment (D23/355)