Strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawTen’

This invention relates to a new and distinct cultivar of strawberry plant named ‘DrisStrawTen’. A new cultivar primarily characterized by its high fruit production per plant, early to medium flowering time, everbearing fruit, low number of achenes per berry, resistance to moderate resistance to powdery mildew, and moderate resistance to Verticillium wilt and strawberry Mottle Virus is disclosed.

Skip to: Description  ·  Claims  · Patent History  ·  Patent History
Description

Genus and species: Fragaria×ananassa.

Variety denomination: ‘DrisStrawTen’.

BACKGROUND OF THE NEW PLANT

The present invention relates to a new and distinct strawberry cultivar designated ‘DrisStrawTen’ and botanically known as Fragaria×ananassa. This new strawberry cultivar was discovered in Summer, 2004 in Monterey, Calif. and originated from a cross between the female parent ‘94J283’, a proprietary strawberry plant (unpatented) and the male parent ‘112H25’, a proprietary strawberry plant (unpatented). The original seedling of the new cultivar was asexually propagated at a nursery in Shasta County, Calif. ‘DrisStrawTen’ was subsequently asexually propagated and underwent further testing at a nursery in Monterey, Calif. for five years. The present invention has been found to retain its distinctive characteristics through successive asexual propagations.

DESCRIPTION OF THE PHOTOGRAPHS

The accompanying color photographs show typical specimens of the new cultivar at various stages of development as nearly true as it is possible to make in color reproductions. The photograph is of a plant about 7 months old.

FIG. 1 shows overall plant habit including fruit at various stages of development.

FIG. 2 shows leaves of the plant with three leaflets.

FIG. 3 shows both the upperside and underside of several of the flowers.

FIG. 4 shows the whole fruit.

FIG. 5 shows the fruit in longitudinal cross-section.

DESCRIPTION OF THE NEW CULTIVAR

The following description of ‘DrisStrawTen’ is based on observations taken from the 2004 to 2008 growing seasons in Monterey, Calif. This description is in accordance with UPOV terminology. Color designations, color descriptions, and other phenotypical descriptions may deviate from the stated values and descriptions depending upon variation in environmental, seasonal, climatic and cultural conditions. ‘DrisStrawTen’ has not been observed under all possible environmental conditions. Color terminology follows The Royal Horticultural Society Colour Chart, London (R.H.S.) (2001).

DETAILED BOTANICAL DESCRIPTION

Table 1 shows plant characteristics of the new variety compared with plant characteristics of the commercial varieties, ‘Driscoll Lanai’ (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 15,145) and ‘San Juan’ (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 12,899). Plant characteristics include plant height, diameter, number of crowns per plant, habit, density of individual plant and vigor.

TABLE 1 Characteristic ‘DrisStrawTen’ ‘Driscoll Lanai’ ‘San Juan’ Plant height (cm) 21.4 25.1 24.7 Plant diameter (cm) 33.4 36.5 38.9 Number of 3 3 3 crowns/plant Habit Globose Flat globose Globose Density of Between medium Medium Between individual plant and dense medium and dense Vigor Between weak Medium Medium and medium

Table 2 shows leaf characteristics of the new cultivar compared with leaf characteristics of ‘Driscoll Lanai’ and ‘San Juan’. Leaf characteristics include terminal leaflet length and width in centimeters, length to width ratio, number of teeth per terminal leaflet, shape of teeth, color of upperside and underside of leaf, leaf shape in cross section, leaf blistering, leaf glossiness, number of leaflets, leaflet margin, leaflet shape, shape of leaf apex and shape of leaf base.

TABLE 2 Leaf Characteristic ‘DrisStrawTen’ ‘Driscoll Lanai’ ‘San Juan’ Terminal leaflet 7.1 7.9 7.4 length (cm) Terminal leaflet 7.2 7.6 7.9 width (cm) Terminal leaflet 1.0 1.0 0.9 length/width ratio Terminal leaflet: As long as As long as As long as length/width ratio broad broad broad No. teeth/terminal 21 23 25 leaflet Shape of teeth Rounded Rounded Rounded Color of upperside RHS 147A RHS 147A RHS 147A of leaf Dark yellow- Dark yellow- Dark yellow- green green green Color of underside RHS 147C RHS 147C RHS 147B of leaf Medium yellow- Medium yellow- Medium green green yellow-green Leaf shape in Slightly Slightly Concave cross section concave concave Leaf blistering Medium Medium Weak Leaf glossiness Between medium Medium Medium and strong No. leaflets Three only Three only Three only Terminal leaflet Flat Revolute Revolute margin Terminal leaflet Orbicular Orbicular Orbicular shape Terminal leaflet Rounded Rounded Rounded shape of base Terminal leaflet Rounded Rounded Rounded shape of apex

Table 3 shows information about the petiole, the petiolule, the bract, and the stipule of the new cultivar compared to ‘Driscoll Lanai’ and ‘San Juan’. This includes petiole length in centimeters, petiole diameter in centimeters, petiolule length in centimeters, petiolule diameter in centimeters, bract frequency per petiole, stipule length in centimeters, stipule width in centimeters, stipule pubescence, petiole pubescence, pose of hairs on the petiole, color of the petiole, color of the petiolule and stipule anthocyanin coloration.

TABLE 3 Characteristic ‘DrisStrawTen’ ‘Driscoll Lanai’ ‘San Juan’ Petiole length (cm) 12.1 13.6 11.0 Petiole diameter 0.340 0.389 0.404 (cm) Petiole pubescence Dense Dense Dense Petiole pose of hairs Outwards Outwards Upwards Petiole color RHS 145A RHS 144C RHS 144C Medium yellow- Medium yellow- Medium green green yellow-green Petiolule color RHS 145B RHS 144C RHS 145B Medium yellow- Medium Medium green yellow-green yellow-green Petiolule 0.831 1.203 0.734 length (cm) Petiolule 0.164 0.151 0.177 diameter (cm) Bract frequency 1 0 1 Stipule length (cm) 3.1 3.5 3.2 Stipule width (cm) 0.973 0.832 1.197 Stipule pubescence Medium Dense Dense Stipule anthocyanin Absent to Absent to Absent to coloration very weak very weak very weak

Table 4 shows stolon characteristics of the new cultivar compared to ‘Driscoll Lanai’ and ‘San Juan’. These characteristics include the number of stolons, average number of daughter plants, the anthocyanin coloration of the stolons, the thickness of the stolons, and the pubescence of the stolons.

TABLE 4 Characteristic ‘DrisStrawTen’ ‘Driscoll Lanai’ ‘San Juan’ Stolon number Medium Many Between medium and many Average number of 35 17 57 daughter plants Stolon anthocyanin Medium Strong Strong Stolon thickness Medium Between medium Medium and thick Stolon pubescence Sparse Dense Medium

Table 5 shows inflorescence characteristics of the new cultivar compared to ‘Driscoll Lanai’ and ‘San Juan’. These characteristics include inflorescence position relative to foliage, relative flower size, flower diameter in centimeters (measured from petal tip to petal tip), petal shape, petal apex shape, petal base shape, petal margin, relative spacing of petals, petal length in centimeters, petal width in centimeters, petal length to width ratio, typical number of petals observed, petal color, calyx diameter in centimeters (measured on back of flower from sepal tip to sepal tip), diameter of calyx relative to corolla, diameter of inner calyx relative to outer, sepal shape, sepal apex shape, sepal margin, sepal length in centimeters (measured from sepal tip to point of attachment to receptacle), sepal width in centimeters, typical number of sepals observed, receptacle color and anther color.

TABLE 5 Characteristic ‘DrisStrawTen’ ‘Driscoll Lanai’ ‘San Juan’ Inflorescence Above Above Above position relative to foliage Flower size Medium Medium Medium Flower diameter 2.785 2.835 2.850 (cm) Petal shape Orbicular Orbicular Orbicular Petal apex Rounded Rounded Rounded Petal margin Entire Entire Entire Petal base shape Concave- Concave- Concave- convex convex convex Petal spacing Overlapping Overlapping Overlapping Petal length (cm) 1.254 1.133 1.227 Petal width (cm) 1.332 1.200 1.339 Petal length/ 0.9 0.9 0.9 width ratio Typical and 7 6 6 observed petal number Petal length/ As long as As long as As long as width ratio broad broad broad Petal color RHS 155C RHS 155B RHS 155C White White White Calyx diameter 3.696 3.647 3.960 cm Calyx diameter Larger Between larger Larger relative and much to corolla larger Inner calyx Same size Same size Same size diameter relative to outer Sepal shape Elliptical Elliptical Elliptical Sepal apex Convex Convex Convex Sepal margin Entire Entire Entire Sepal length cm 1.380 1.297 1.330 Sepal width (cm) 0.655 0.560 1.269 Typical and 14 13 13 observed sepal number Receptacle color RHS 2A RHS 150B RHS 2A Medium Medium yellow- Medium yellow green yellow Anther color RHS 163B RHS N167C RHS 163B Medium Light greyed- Medium greyed-orange orange greyed-orange

Table 6 shows fruit characteristics of the new cultivar compared to ‘Driscoll Lanai’ and ‘San Juan’.

TABLE 6 ‘Driscoll Characteristic ‘DrisStrawTen’ Lanai’ ‘San Juan’ Fruiting truss 20.2 22.2 25.1 length (cm) Fruiting truss 0.442 0.360 0.481 diameter (cm) Number of berries 4 4 4 per fruiting truss Fruiting truss Erect Semi-erect Semi-erect attitude Fruiting truss Medium Long Long length Truss color RHS 144A RHS 144A RHS 144A Medium Medium Medium yellow- yellow- yellow- green green green Fruit length 4.207 4.327 4.857 (cm) Fruit width 4.289 4.431 4.603 (cm) Fruit length/ 1.0 1.0 1.1 width ratio Fruit length/ As long as As long as As long as width ratio broad broad broad Fruit weight 23.1 25.6 28.0 (g) Relative fruit Medium Medium Large size Predominant fruit Conical Conical Conical shape Difference in Slight Slight Slight shape between primary & secondary fruits Band without Narrow Narrow Narrow achenes Unevenness Weak Between Medium of fruit medium and surface strong Fruit skin RHS 45A RHS 46A RHS 53A color Dark red Dark red Dark red Evenness of Even Even Even fruit color Fruit glossiness Medium Medium Between medium and strong Insertion of Level with Above surface Below surface achenes surface Achene RHS 185A RHS 183C RHS 180B coloration- Dark Dark Medium sunward side greyed- greyed- greyed-red of berry purple purple Achene coloration- RHS 151B RHS 152B RHS 150B shaded side of Medium medium light yellow- berry yellow-green yellow- green green Achenes per berry 324 345 397 Achene weight (g) 0.00057453 0.000497336 0.000558419 Insertion of calyx Level Level Level Pose of calyx Spreading Reflexed Reflexed segments Size of calyx Same size Larger Between in relation smaller and to fruit same size Adherence Medium Medium Strong of calyx Firmness Medium Medium Firm of flesh Color of the RHS 43B RHS 155A RHS 155B flesh Medium White and White and red and RHS 41B RHS 41A RHS 49D medium red medium red light red Evenness of Uneven Slightly uneven Slightly flesh color uneven Distribution Marginal and Marginal and Marginal and of flesh color central central central Fruit hollow 2.047 2.055 2.169 length (cm) Fruit hollow 1.610 0.774 0.738 width (cm) Fruit hollow 1.3 2.7 2.9 length/width ratio Hollow center Medium Medium Small Sweetness Medium Medium Strong Acidity Medium Medium Weak Texture when tasted Medium Medium Fine Time of flowering Between early Between early Between early and medium and medium and medium Harvest maturity Late March Late March Late March (50% of plants to early to early to early with ripe fruit) November November November Type of bearing Fully everbearing Partially Partially everbearing everbearing Grams of fruit/plant 1,769 1,609 1,412

Table 7 shows pest and disease characteristics of the new cultivar compared to ‘Driscoll Lanai’ and ‘San Juan’.

TABLE 7 ‘Driscoll Pest or Disease ‘DrisStrawTen’ Lanai’ ‘San Juan’ Tetranychus urticae Moderately Susceptible Moderately (2-spotted spider susceptible susceptible mite) Botrytis fruit Susceptible Susceptible Susceptible rot Powdery mildew Between resistant Susceptible Susceptible and moderately resistant Verticillium Moderately Moderately Susceptible wilt resistant susceptible Viral diseases - Moderately Moderately Moderately Strawberry Mottle resistant resistant resistant Virus Xanthomonas Moderately Moderately Moderately fragariae susceptible susceptible susceptible

Claims

1. A new and distinct cultivar of strawberry plant as described and shown herein.

Patent History
Patent number: PP20775
Type: Grant
Filed: Nov 12, 2008
Date of Patent: Feb 23, 2010
Assignee: Driscoll Strawberry Associates, Inc. (Watsonville, CA)
Inventors: Bruce D. Mowrey (Watsonville, CA), Philip J. Stewart (Watsonville, CA), Martin P. Madesko (Watsonville, CA), JoAnne F. Coss (Watsonville, CA)
Primary Examiner: Annette H Para
Attorney: Jondle & Associates, P.C.
Application Number: 12/291,596
Classifications
Current U.S. Class: Everbearing (PLT/209)
International Classification: A01H 5/00 (20060101);