Method and an apparatus for capturing three-dimensional data of an area of space
In a method for capturing three-dimensional data of an area of space, a plurality of measuring beams (Ls) are sent out to a plurality of measuring points. A detector (50) receives a plurality of reflected beams (Lr) which are reflected by the measuring points (34a). A plurality of distances to the measuring points (34a, 34b) are determined as a function of the reflected beams (Lr). According to one aspect of the invention, at least one object (30) which comprises a hidden channel (66) having a visible entry opening (72) is located in the area of space. A rod-shaped element (32) is inserted into the channel (66) in such a manner that a free end proximal portion (70) protrudes from the entry opening (72). A first distance to a first measuring point (34a) and a second distance to a second measuring point (34b) are determined. An orientation (74) of the hidden channel (66) is determined as a function of the first and the second distances.
Latest FARO TECHNOLOGIES, INC. Patents:
- Virtual reality system for viewing point cloud volumes while maintaining a high point cloud graphical resolution
- Laser projector system
- Automatic selection of a region in a three-dimensional (3D) point cloud
- Laser scanner with target detection
- Artificial intelligence based registration support for environmental scans
This is a U.S. national stage of application No. PCT/EP2007/005789, filed on 29 Jun. 2007. Priority under 35 U.S.C. §119(a) and 35 U.S.C. §365(b) is claimed from German Application No. 10 2006 031 580.4, filed 3 Jul. 2006, the disclosure of which is also incorporated herein by reference.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTIONThe present invention relates to a method for capturing three-dimensional data of an area of space, comprising the steps of:
-
- providing a laser scanner having a transmitter and a receiver,
- sending out a plurality of measuring beams by means of the transmitter to a plurality of measuring points in the area of space,
- receiving a plurality of reflected beams which are reflected by the measuring points, and
- determining a plurality of distances to the plurality of measuring points as a function of the reflected beams.
The invention also relates to an apparatus for capturing three dimensional data of an area of space, comprising a laser scanner having a transmitter and a receiver, the transmitter being configured for sending out a plurality of measuring beams to a plurality of measuring points in the area of space, the receiver being configured for receiving a plurality of reflected beams which are reflected by the measuring points and for determining a plurality of distances to the plurality of measuring points as a function of the reflected beams.
Such a method and such an apparatus are known, for example, from DE 103 61 870 B4.
This document discloses a laser scanner comprising a measuring head which holds a rotor rotatably supported. The rotor is rotated about a horizontal axis whilst sending out a plurality of laser beams. Due to the rotation of the rotor, the laser beams are sent out into a plurality of directions in space which cover an elevation angle of 270° or more. In addition, the measuring head is rotated about a vertical axis so that the laser beams sent out almost completely scan the surrounding area of space. In the measuring head, a receiver is arranged which receives the reflected beams reflected from object points in the area of space and which determines the distances to the object points by means of a difference in delay time between the beams sent out and the received beams. In addition, the receiver generates for each measuring point a gray scale value which depends on the intensity of the reflected measuring beam. Altogether, this known laser scanner can be used for recording a three-dimensional image of an area of space, the plurality of gray scale values producing an all-rotund image which is comparable to a black/white recording of the area of space. In addition, a distance information item is provided for each measuring point so that the area of space can be examined more accurately, surveyed and/or documented later by means of the recorded data. A typical application for such a laser scanner is the surveying of factory halls in which, for example, a new production line is to be planned and set up. In another known application, such a laser scanner is moved through a tunnel tube (if necessary without rotation about the vertical axis) in order to check, e.g., the state of the tunnel and determine the clear width at every point in the tunnel.
In principle, such a laser scanner is suitable for capturing three-dimensional data of any area of space which is bounded by objects such as walls or natural obstacles. The relatively fast and extensive data acquisition including an “optical image” of the area of space in an all-round view also allows such a laser scanner to be advantageous for forensic applications, i.e. the coverage and documentation of crime scenes. However, forensic coverage of a crime scene requires further information which cannot be supplied by laser scanners hitherto known. This includes primarily information about the location and the course of bullet channels produced when a projectile penetrates into a wall or into another obstacle.
For the forensic coverage of bullet channels, rods marked with colours colors are used today which rods are inserted into a bullet channel in such a manner that a proximal end proximal-portion of the rods protrudes protrude from the entry opening of the bullet channel. These rods can be used for identifying the orientation of the bullet channel. Suitable rods are offered, for example, by the Lightning Powder Company, Inc., 13386 International Parkway, Jacksonville, Fla. 32218, USA.
Against this background, it is an object of the present invention to improve a method and an apparatus of the type initially mentioned in order to open up new applications. In particular, it is an object of the invention to facilitate the forensic data capture of an area of space.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTIONAccording to one aspect of the present invention, this object is achieved by a method of the type initially mentioned in which the area of space comprises at least one object which contains a hidden channel having a visible entry opening, a rod-shaped element being inserted into the channel in such a manner that a free end proximal portion freely protrudes from the entry opening, a first distance to a first measuring point at the free end proximal portion and at least one second distance to a second measuring point at the free end proximal portion are determined, and an orientation of the hidden channel is determined as a function of the first and second distances.
According to another aspect of the invention, this object is achieved by an apparatus of the type initially mentioned in which the receiver is also configured for determining an orientation of a rod-shaped element having a free end proximal portion which protrudes from an entry opening of a hidden channel at an object in the area of space by the receiver determining a first distance to a first measuring point at the free end proximal portion and at least one second distance to a second measuring point at the free end proximal portion.
The present invention can be used for determining the orientation of a bullet channel or any other channel hidden in an object from the data which are acquired by means of the laser scanner. The capabilities of the known laser scanner are extended because the laser scanner, somehow, can “look into” the object by means of the rod-shaped element. As can be easily understood, the novel method and the novel apparatus are particularly well suited for the forensic data capture of crime scenes in which firearms were used. In addition, however, the novel method and the novel apparatus can also be used for other purposes in which the orientation of a channel hidden in an object is to be documented and surveyed, for example for documenting drilled holes in building walls.
The novel method and the novel apparatus have the advantage that the orientation of the channel can be determined very rapidly and with high accuracy, the data for determining the orientation being acquired at the same time as the “remaining” area of space is measured three-dimensionally. It is particularly advantageous that the orientation of the channel can be marked in the “optical image” of the area of space which facilitates documentation and later analysis.
The above-mentioned object is thus completely achieved.
In a preferred embodiment of the invention, the rod shaped element has a rod-shaped distal area portion and a proximal area portion, the rod-shaped distal area portion being configured for insertion into the hidden channel and the proximal area portion having at least one enlarged body at which the first and second measuring point points are arranged. The first and second measuring point are preferably arranged at a relative distance from one another along the rod-shaped element, the relative distance preferably being approximately 10 cm or more. The distal area portion preferably has an outside diameter between about 0.2 cm and 1 cm. The outside diameter of the enlarged body is preferably between about 2 cm and 15 cm, furthermore preferably between about 5 cm and 10 cm.
Providing the rod-shaped element with a relatively thin distal area portion and a thickened proximal area portion facilitates precise and unambiguous determination of the orientation. The relatively thin distal end portion enables the rod-shaped element to be inserted into narrow bullet channels, drilled holes etc. On the other hand, the enlarged body at the proximal area portion facilitates unambiguous identification of the rod-shaped element and thus a more reliable and accurate determination of the orientation. This was not to be expected at the beginning because an increase in measuring accuracy is typically achieved by means of a “fine” measuring instrument. In the present embodiment, however, an enlarged body is used which exceeds the dimensions of the hidden channel by 10- to 20-times in preferred embodiments. However, it has been found that the enlarged body can be surveyed in its own dimensions due to the three-dimensional coverage of the area of space which then enables the orientation to be determined mathematically with increased accuracy.
In a further embodiment, the distal area portion defines a longitudinal axis and the at least one body has a center point which is essentially located on the longitudinal axis.
In this embodiment, the body is arranged approximately coaxially with respect to the distal area portion of the rod-shaped element. This facilitates the exact determination of the orientation. In addition, the rotational position of the rod-shaped element about its longitudinal axis is not important in this embodiment so that the rod-shaped element can be positioned in the channel in a simpler and quicker manner.
In a further embodiment, a plurality of body distances to a plurality of measuring points at the at least one body are determined and the center point is determined as a function of the plurality of body distances.
In this embodiment, the body itself is surveyed in order to determine its center point as precisely as possible. The more accurately it is possible to determine the center point of the body, the more accurately it is possible to determine the orientation of the hidden channel.
In a preferred refinement of this embodiment, the body has a defined geometric shape and an ideal image of this geometric shape is matched to a cloud of points which represents the plurality of body distances. For example, the matching can take place in accordance with the method of least squares. This embodiment enables the orientation of the hidden channel to be determined accurately even when the surveying of the body is burdened with high measurement noise.
In a further embodiment, each reflected beam has a beam intensity and the orientation is also determined as a function of the beam intensities.
In this embodiment, it is not only the distance information but also the beam intensities which are used for determining the position and alignment of the at least one body. Since the accuracy with which the orientation can be determined depends on the accuracy with which the body is surveyed, this embodiment enables the measuring accuracy to be further improved.
In a further embodiment, the at least one body has an elongated shape, particularly a cylindrical shape.
In this embodiment, the body has a defined main direction which is advantageously coaxial with the orientation sought. Using such a body facilitates the determination of the orientation and increases the measuring accuracy. The longer the elongated shape, the more it is possible to detect measuring points which are further apart by means of the laser scanner. Measuring points which are far apart reduce measuring errors which can be produced due to tolerances and/or measurement noise.
In a further embodiment, the rod-shaped element comprises at least two bodies which are arranged at a relative distance from one another.
This embodiment, too, provides for measuring points which are far apart on the rod-shaped element and, in consequence, a reduction in measuring errors. This embodiment is particularly advantageous if the at least two bodies have the same shape because identical algorithms can then be used for determining the center point points. Compared with a single elongated body, this embodiment has the advantage that the free freely protruding proximal end portion is loaded by a lighter weight which reduces bending of the rod-shaped element.
In a further embodiment, the at least two bodies are spheres. As an alternative, the at least two bodies can be cubes or other geometric elements.
Spheres enable the center point to be determined in a relatively simple and precise manner which is largely independent of the direction of view or the angle of view of the laser scanner. Spheres are therefore generally preferred as bodies. By comparison, cubic bodies have the advantage that the rod shaped element cannot roll away which facilitates practical handling and transportation.
In a further embodiment, the hidden channel is a bullet channel and an assumed position of a gunman within the area of space is determined as a function of the orientation. The determination of the assumed position is advantageously automatic by looking for a position which approximately corresponds to the size of a gunman along the orientation.
This embodiment represents a particularly preferred application of the novel method and of the novel apparatus because it simplifies and accelerates the forensic data capture of a crime scene.
In a further embodiment, the rod-shaped element comprises a marking 80 (see FIG. 3, for example) in the distal area portion 68, which marking 80 has more reflective and less reflective sections.
Using this embodiment, the depth of the hidden channel can be documented in a very simple manner since the sections with different reflectivity lead to different beam intensities of the reflected beams. Such a marking 80 is therefore clearly visible in the optical image and it can be identified in a relatively quick and simple manner in the recorded data.
It goes without saying that the features mentioned above and those yet to be explained in the following can be used not only in the combination specified in each case but also in other combinations or by themselves without departing from the scope of the present invention.
Illustrative embodiments of the invention are shown in the drawing and will be explained in greater detail in the following description.
In
The measuring head 12 has an approximately U-shaped housing. Between the two housing legs, a rotor 20 is arranged which can be rotated about a horizontal axis 22 as is indicated by the arrow 24. The rotor 20 has an exit window from which a measuring beam Ls can emerge. The measuring beam Ls extends along a beam axis 26 to a measuring point 28 on an object 30. The measuring beam is reflected from the measuring point 28 and passes back to the measuring head 12 as reflected beam Lr where the reflected beam Lr encounters the rotor 20 and is detected by a detector, not shown here. From the time difference between sending out of the measuring beam Ls and the reception of the reflected beam Lr, the distance d between the laser scanner 10 and the measuring point 28 can be determined. The measuring beam Ls is advantageously modulated for determining the delay time.
According to a preferred embodiment of the invention, the measuring point 28 is located here in the area of an entry or exit opening of a channel (not shown here) which is hidden in the object 30. To determine the orientation of the channel, the novel apparatus comprises a rod-shaped element 32 which is inserted with a rod-shaped distal end portion 68 (best seen with reference to FIG. 2) into the opening of the channel. At the free a freely protruding proximal end portion 70 (best seen with reference to FIG. 2) of the rod-shaped element 32, a body in the form of a sphere 34 is arranged here.
Reference number 36 designates a person who stands at a position in the area of space 38 from which a shot has presumably been fired, the projectile of which has created the hidden channel in the object 30. This position can be determined from the orientation of the hidden channel by means of the novel method and the novel apparatus.
The measuring head 12 has a base 40 on which two support walls 42, 44 are arranged vertically. The support wall 42, together with a housing part 46, forms an internal space in which a light transmitter 48 and a detector 50 are arranged. The light transmitter 48 is here a laser diode, the detector 50 comprises a plurality of light-sensitive elements in a matrix-type arrangement.
Reference number 52 designates an evaluation and control unit which contains a PC-based computing unit in a preferred embodiment. The evaluation and control unit 52 drives the light transmitter 48 in such a manner that it generates a modulated measuring beam Ls. In addition, the evaluation and control unit 52 reads out the detector 50 for determining the distance d and the light intensity of the reflected light beam Lr.
The rotor 20 here carries a mirror 54 which is arranged opposite the transmitter 48 and the detector 50 and which is inclined by 45° with respect to the latter. The rotor 20 is connected to a drive 56 which produces a rotation of the mirror 54 about the horizontal axis 22. Due to this rotation, the measuring beam Ls is deflected along a vertical circular area in the area of space 38.
As already mentioned with respect to
Reference number 66 designates a hidden channel in the object 30, for example a wall. According to an illustrative embodiment of the invention, the distal end portion 68 of the rod-shaped element 32 is pushed into the channel 66. The proximal end portion 70 of the rod-shaped element 32 protrudes from the entry or exit opening 72 of the channel 66. At the proximal end portion 70, two spheres 34a, 34b are arranged here as will still be described in greater detail by means of
The rod-shaped element 32 defines a longitudinal axis 74 which corresponds to the orientation of the hidden channel 66. This orientation can be determined in an automated manner by means of the two spheres 34a, 34b by determining the position of the two spheres 34a, 34b by means of the laser scanner 10. The positions of the spheres can be used for determining a vector which represents the orientation 74.
In one illustrative embodiment, the spheres 34a, 34b are of polystyrene and are pushed onto the rod of the rod rod-shaped element 32. The spheres 34a, 34b can be movable on the rod or can be fixed in their respective position, for example by bonding.
Each sphere 34a, 34b has a center point 76a, 76b of the sphere which is determined in preferred illustrative embodiments of the novel method. As shown in
In the text which follows, a preferred illustrative embodiment of the novel method is described by means of
Once all measurement data have been recorded, the body or bodies on the rod-shaped element 32, such as, for example, the spheres 34a, 34b, is/are identified according to step 106. Following this, the coordinates of the center points 76a, 76b are determined according to step 108. In preferred embodiments, this is done by fitting ideal spheres into the “clouds of points” which were recorded by means of the laser scanner 10. For example, the fitting-in can take place in accordance with the method of least squares. Following this, the center point coordinates of the spheres fitted in are calculated.
From the center point coordinates calculated, the orientation 74 is determined according to step 110. Following this, the assumed position of the gunman who has fired a projectile which has formed the (bullet) channel 66 is determined according to step 112. For this purpose, a position or position range is sought along the orientation 74 at which a “typical height” above ground intersects the orientation 74. The typical height is within the range of between about 1 m and 1.80 m. As an alternative or additionally, the assumed position of the gunman can be determined by inserting an image of a person along the orientation 74 into the image of the area of space which was recorded by means of the laser scanner 10 (from the intensities of the reflected beams). In further illustrative embodiments, a person 36 can be recorded during the scanning of the area of space 38 so that the coordinates of the person 36 can be compared with the orientation 74.
Claims
1. A method for capturing three-dimensional data of an area of space, comprising:
- providing a laser scanner comprising a transmitter and a receiver,
- sending out a plurality of measuring beams (Ls) by means of the transmitter to a plurality of measuring points in the area of space,
- receiving a plurality of reflected beams (Lr) which are reflected by the measuring points, and
- determining a plurality of distances to the plurality of measuring points as a function of the reflected beams (Lr),
- determining for each measuring point of the plurality of measuring points a gray scale value that depends on an intensity of respective ones of the plurality of reflected beams (Lr), and
- recording a cloud of points, representative of the plurality of measuring points in the area of space, determined as a function of the plurality of distances and respective gray scale values,
- wherein the area of space comprises at least one object which contains a hidden channel having a visible entry opening, a rod-shaped element being inserted into the channel in such a manner that a free end proximal portion of the rod-shaped element protrudes from the entry opening, a first distance the rod-shaped element comprising a defined geometric shape having a first three-dimensional coordinate and at least one second three-dimensional coordinate in the area of space, an ideal image of the geometric shape being matched to the cloud of points that represents measuring points of the geometric shape, the first three-dimensional coordinate to a first measuring point at the free end proximal portion and at least one second distance the at least one second three-dimensional coordinate to a second measuring point at the free end proximal portion being determined using the ideal image that is matched to the cloud of points that represent measuring points of the geometric shape, and an orientation of the hidden channel being determined as a function of a vector between the first and second distance three-dimensional coordinates.
2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the rod-shaped element has a rod-shaped distal area and a proximal area portion, the rod-shaped distal area portion being configured for insertion into the hidden channel and the proximal area portion having at least one enlarged body at which the first and second measuring points are arranged.
3. The method according to claim 2, wherein the distal area portion defines a longitudinal axis, and that the at least one body has a center point which is essentially located on the longitudinal axis.
4. The method according to claim 3, wherein a plurality of body distances to a plurality of measuring points at the at least one body are determined, and that the center point is determined as a function of the plurality of body distances.
5. The method according to claim 1, wherein each reflected beam (Lr) has a beam intensity, and the orientation is also determined as a function of the beam intensities.
6. The method according to claim 1 2, wherein the at least one body has an elongated shape, particularly a cylindrical shape.
7. The method according to claim 1, wherein the rod-shaped element comprises at least two bodies arranged at a relative distance (dss) from one another.
8. The method according to claim 7, wherein the at least two bodies are spheres.
9. The method according to claim 7, wherein the at least two bodies are cubes.
10. The method according to claim 1, wherein the hidden channel is a bullet channel, and an assumed position of a gunman within the area of space is determined as a function of the orientation.
11. The method according to claim 1 2, wherein the rod-shaped element comprises a marking in the distal area portion, which marking has more reflective and less reflective sections.
12. The method according to claim 1, wherein the rod-shaped element further comprises a rod-shaped distal area and a proximal area portion, the rod-shaped distal area portion being configured for insertion into the hidden channel and the proximal area portion comprising at least one enlarged body providing at least two measuring points which are different from one another.
13. An apparatus structured to capture three-dimensional data of an area of space, comprising:
- a laser scanner having a transmitter and a receiver, the transmitter being configured for sending out a plurality of measuring beams (Ls) to a plurality of measuring points in the area of space, and the receiver being configured to receive a plurality of reflected beams (Lr) which are reflected by the measuring points and, to determine a plurality of distances to the plurality of measuring points as a function of the reflected beams (Lr), to determine for each measuring point of the plurality of measuring points a gray scale value that depends on an intensity of respective ones of the plurality of reflected beams (Lr), and to record a cloud of points, representative of the plurality of measuring points in the area of space, determined as a function of the plurality of distances and respective gray scale values, and
- a rod-shaped element comprising a defined geometric shape,
- wherein the receiver is also arranged configured for determining an orientation of a hidden channel at an object in the area of space, wherein a the rod-shaped element has a free end proximal portion which protrudes from an entry opening of the hidden channel,
- wherein the receiver is configured for: matching an ideal image of the geometric shape to the cloud of points that represent measuring points of the geometric shape, the geometric shape having a first three-dimensional coordinate and at least one second three-dimensional coordinate in the area of space; determining a first distance the first three-dimensional coordinate to a first measuring point at the free end proximal portion and at least one second distance the at least one second three-dimensional coordinate to a second measuring point at the free end proximal portion using the ideal image that is matched to the cloud of points that represent measuring points of the geometric shape; and, determining the orientation of the hidden channel as a function of a vector between the first and second three-dimensional coordinates.
14. The apparatus according to claim 13, wherein the rod-shaped element further comprises a rod-shaped distal area and a proximal area portion, the rod-shaped distal area portion being configured for insertion into the hidden channel and the proximal area portion comprising at least one enlarged body providing at least two measuring points which are different from one another.
| 5898484 | April 27, 1999 | Harris |
| D423534 | April 25, 2000 | Raab et al. |
| D441632 | May 8, 2001 | Raab et al. |
| D472824 | April 8, 2003 | Raab et al. |
| D479544 | September 9, 2003 | Raab et al. |
| 6675122 | January 6, 2004 | Markendorf et al. |
| D490831 | June 1, 2004 | Raab et al. |
| D491210 | June 8, 2004 | Raab et al. |
| 7230689 | June 12, 2007 | Lau |
| 7242590 | July 10, 2007 | Yeap et al. |
| 7246030 | July 17, 2007 | Raab et al. |
| 7249421 | July 31, 2007 | MacManus et al. |
| 7256899 | August 14, 2007 | Faul et al. |
| 7269910 | September 18, 2007 | Raab et al. |
| D551943 | October 2, 2007 | Hodjat et al. |
| 7285793 | October 23, 2007 | Husted |
| 7296364 | November 20, 2007 | Seitz et al. |
| 7296955 | November 20, 2007 | Dreier |
| 7296979 | November 20, 2007 | Raab et al. |
| 7306339 | December 11, 2007 | Kaufman et al. |
| 7307701 | December 11, 2007 | Hoffman, II |
| 7312862 | December 25, 2007 | Zumbrunn et al. |
| 7313264 | December 25, 2007 | Crampton |
| D559657 | January 15, 2008 | Wohlford et al. |
| 7319512 | January 15, 2008 | Ohtomo et al. |
| 7330242 | February 12, 2008 | Reichert et al. |
| 7337344 | February 26, 2008 | Barman et al. |
| 7342650 | March 11, 2008 | Kern et al. |
| 7348822 | March 25, 2008 | Baer |
| 7352446 | April 1, 2008 | Bridges et al. |
| 7360648 | April 22, 2008 | Blaschke |
| 7372558 | May 13, 2008 | Kaufman et al. |
| 7372581 | May 13, 2008 | Raab et al. |
| 7383638 | June 10, 2008 | Granger |
| 7388654 | June 17, 2008 | Raab et al. |
| 7389870 | June 24, 2008 | Slappay |
| 7395606 | July 8, 2008 | Crampton |
| 7400384 | July 15, 2008 | Evans et al. |
| 7403268 | July 22, 2008 | England et al. |
| 7403269 | July 22, 2008 | Yamashita et al. |
| 7430068 | September 30, 2008 | Becker et al. |
| 7430070 | September 30, 2008 | Soreide et al. |
| 7441341 | October 28, 2008 | Eaton |
| 7443555 | October 28, 2008 | Blug et al. |
| 7447931 | November 4, 2008 | Rischar et al. |
| 7449876 | November 11, 2008 | Pleasant et al. |
| 7454265 | November 18, 2008 | Marsh |
| 7463368 | December 9, 2008 | Morden et al. |
| 7477359 | January 13, 2009 | England et al. |
| 7477360 | January 13, 2009 | England et al. |
| 7480037 | January 20, 2009 | Palmateer et al. |
| 7508496 | March 24, 2009 | Mettenleiter et al. |
| 7508971 | March 24, 2009 | Vaccaro et al. |
| 7515256 | April 7, 2009 | Ohtomo et al. |
| 7525276 | April 28, 2009 | Eaton |
| 7527205 | May 5, 2009 | Zhu et al. |
| 7528768 | May 5, 2009 | Wakayama et al. |
| 7541830 | June 2, 2009 | Fahrbach et al. |
| 7545517 | June 9, 2009 | Rueb et al. |
| 7546689 | June 16, 2009 | Ferrari et al. |
| 7551771 | June 23, 2009 | England, III |
| 7552644 | June 30, 2009 | Haase et al. |
| 7557824 | July 7, 2009 | Holliman |
| 7561598 | July 14, 2009 | Stratton et al. |
| 7564250 | July 21, 2009 | Hocker |
| 7568293 | August 4, 2009 | Ferrari |
| 7578069 | August 25, 2009 | Eaton |
| D599226 | September 1, 2009 | Gerent et al. |
| 7589595 | September 15, 2009 | Cutler |
| 7589825 | September 15, 2009 | Orchard et al. |
| 7591077 | September 22, 2009 | Pettersson |
| 7591078 | September 22, 2009 | Crampton |
| 7599106 | October 6, 2009 | Matsumoto et al. |
| 7600061 | October 6, 2009 | Honda |
| 7602873 | October 13, 2009 | Eidson |
| 7604207 | October 20, 2009 | Hasloecher et al. |
| 7610175 | October 27, 2009 | Eidson |
| 7614157 | November 10, 2009 | Granger |
| 7624510 | December 1, 2009 | Ferrari |
| 7625335 | December 1, 2009 | Deichmann et al. |
| 7626690 | December 1, 2009 | Kumagai et al. |
| D607350 | January 5, 2010 | Cooduvalli et al. |
| 7656751 | February 2, 2010 | Rischar et al. |
| 7659995 | February 9, 2010 | Knighton et al. |
| D610926 | March 2, 2010 | Gerent et al. |
| 7693325 | April 6, 2010 | Pulla et al. |
| 7697748 | April 13, 2010 | Dimsdale et al. |
| 7701592 | April 20, 2010 | Saint Clair et al. |
| 7712224 | May 11, 2010 | Hicks |
| 7721396 | May 25, 2010 | Fleischman |
| 7728833 | June 1, 2010 | Verma et al. |
| 7728963 | June 1, 2010 | Kirschner |
| 7733544 | June 8, 2010 | Becker et al. |
| 7735234 | June 15, 2010 | Briggs et al. |
| 7743524 | June 29, 2010 | Eaton et al. |
| 7752003 | July 6, 2010 | MacManus |
| 7756615 | July 13, 2010 | Barfoot et al. |
| 7765707 | August 3, 2010 | Tomelleri |
| 7769559 | August 3, 2010 | Reichert |
| 7774949 | August 17, 2010 | Ferrari |
| 7777761 | August 17, 2010 | England et al. |
| 7779548 | August 24, 2010 | Ferrari |
| 7779553 | August 24, 2010 | Jordil et al. |
| 7784194 | August 31, 2010 | Raab et al. |
| 7787670 | August 31, 2010 | Urushiya |
| 7793425 | September 14, 2010 | Bailey |
| 7798453 | September 21, 2010 | Maningo et al. |
| 7800758 | September 21, 2010 | Bridges et al. |
| 7804602 | September 28, 2010 | Raab |
| 7805851 | October 5, 2010 | Pettersson |
| 7805854 | October 5, 2010 | Eaton |
| 7809518 | October 5, 2010 | Zhu et al. |
| 7834985 | November 16, 2010 | Morcom |
| 7847922 | December 7, 2010 | Gittinger et al. |
| RE42055 | January 25, 2011 | Raab et al. |
| 7869005 | January 11, 2011 | Ossig et al. |
| RE42082 | February 1, 2011 | Raab et al. |
| 7881896 | February 1, 2011 | Atwell et al. |
| 7889324 | February 15, 2011 | Yamamoto |
| 7891248 | February 22, 2011 | Hough et al. |
| 7900714 | March 8, 2011 | Milbourne et al. |
| 7903245 | March 8, 2011 | Miousset et al. |
| 7903261 | March 8, 2011 | Saint Clair et al. |
| 7908757 | March 22, 2011 | Ferrari |
| 7933055 | April 26, 2011 | Jensen et al. |
| 7935928 | May 3, 2011 | Serger et al. |
| 7965747 | June 21, 2011 | Kumano |
| 7982866 | July 19, 2011 | Vogel |
| D643319 | August 16, 2011 | Ferrari et al. |
| 7990397 | August 2, 2011 | Bukowski et al. |
| 7994465 | August 9, 2011 | Bamji et al. |
| 7995834 | August 9, 2011 | Knighton et al. |
| 8001697 | August 23, 2011 | Danielson et al. |
| 8020657 | September 20, 2011 | Allard et al. |
| 8022812 | September 20, 2011 | Beniyama et al. |
| 8028432 | October 4, 2011 | Bailey et al. |
| 8036775 | October 11, 2011 | Matsumoto et al. |
| 8045762 | October 25, 2011 | Otani et al. |
| 8051710 | November 8, 2011 | Van Dam et al. |
| 8052857 | November 8, 2011 | Townsend |
| 8064046 | November 22, 2011 | Ossig et al. |
| 8065861 | November 29, 2011 | Caputo |
| 8082673 | December 27, 2011 | Desforges et al. |
| 8099877 | January 24, 2012 | Champ |
| 8117668 | February 14, 2012 | Crampton et al. |
| 8123350 | February 28, 2012 | Cannell et al. |
| 8152071 | April 10, 2012 | Doherty et al. |
| D659035 | May 8, 2012 | Ferrari et al. |
| 8171650 | May 8, 2012 | York et al. |
| 8179936 | May 15, 2012 | Bueche et al. |
| D662427 | June 26, 2012 | Bailey et al. |
| 8218131 | July 10, 2012 | Otani et al. |
| 8224032 | July 17, 2012 | Fuchs et al. |
| 8260483 | September 4, 2012 | Barfoot et al. |
| 8269984 | September 18, 2012 | Hinderling et al. |
| 8276286 | October 2, 2012 | Bailey et al. |
| 8284407 | October 9, 2012 | Briggs et al. |
| 8310653 | November 13, 2012 | Ogawa et al. |
| 8321612 | November 27, 2012 | Hartwich et al. |
| 8346392 | January 1, 2013 | Walser et al. |
| 8346480 | January 1, 2013 | Trepagnier et al. |
| 8352212 | January 8, 2013 | Fetter et al. |
| 8353059 | January 8, 2013 | Crampton et al. |
| D676341 | February 19, 2013 | Bailey et al. |
| 8379191 | February 19, 2013 | Braunecker et al. |
| 8381704 | February 26, 2013 | Debelak et al. |
| 8384914 | February 26, 2013 | Becker et al. |
| D678085 | March 19, 2013 | Bailey et al. |
| 8391565 | March 5, 2013 | Purcell et al. |
| 8402669 | March 26, 2013 | Ferrari et al. |
| 8422035 | April 16, 2013 | Hinderling et al. |
| 8497901 | July 30, 2013 | Pettersson |
| 8533967 | September 17, 2013 | Bailey et al. |
| 8537374 | September 17, 2013 | Briggs et al. |
| 8619265 | December 31, 2013 | Steffey et al. |
| 8645022 | February 4, 2014 | Yoshimura et al. |
| 8659748 | February 25, 2014 | Dakin et al. |
| 8659752 | February 25, 2014 | Cramer et al. |
| 8661700 | March 4, 2014 | Briggs et al. |
| 8677643 | March 25, 2014 | Bridges et al. |
| 8683709 | April 1, 2014 | York |
| 8699007 | April 15, 2014 | Becker et al. |
| 8705012 | April 22, 2014 | Greiner et al. |
| 8705016 | April 22, 2014 | Schumann et al. |
| 8718837 | May 6, 2014 | Wang et al. |
| 8784425 | July 22, 2014 | Ritchey et al. |
| 8797552 | August 5, 2014 | Suzuki et al. |
| 8830485 | September 9, 2014 | Chow et al. |
| 20040119020 | June 24, 2004 | Bodkin |
| 20050188557 | September 1, 2005 | Raab et al. |
| 20060066836 | March 30, 2006 | Bridges et al. |
| 20060182314 | August 17, 2006 | England et al. |
| 20060244746 | November 2, 2006 | England et al. |
| 20070171394 | July 26, 2007 | Steiner et al. |
| 20080218728 | September 11, 2008 | Kirschner |
| 20090322859 | December 31, 2009 | Shelton et al. |
| 20090323121 | December 31, 2009 | Valkenburg et al. |
| 20100095542 | April 22, 2010 | Ferrari |
| 20100321152 | December 23, 2010 | Argudyaev et al. |
| 20110001958 | January 6, 2011 | Bridges et al. |
| 20120069352 | March 22, 2012 | Ossig et al. |
| 20120113913 | May 10, 2012 | Tiirola et al. |
| 20120140244 | June 7, 2012 | Gittinger et al. |
| 20120217357 | August 30, 2012 | Franke |
| 20120260512 | October 18, 2012 | Kretschmer et al. |
| 20120260611 | October 18, 2012 | Jones et al. |
| 20120262700 | October 18, 2012 | Schumann et al. |
| 20120287265 | November 15, 2012 | Schumann et al. |
| 20130010307 | January 10, 2013 | Greiner et al. |
| 20130025143 | January 31, 2013 | Bailey et al. |
| 20130025144 | January 31, 2013 | Briggs et al. |
| 20130027515 | January 31, 2013 | Vinther et al. |
| 20130062243 | March 14, 2013 | Chang et al. |
| 20130070250 | March 21, 2013 | Ditte et al. |
| 20130094024 | April 18, 2013 | Ruhland et al. |
| 20130097882 | April 25, 2013 | Bridges et al. |
| 20130125408 | May 23, 2013 | Atwell et al. |
| 20130162472 | June 27, 2013 | Najim et al. |
| 20130176453 | July 11, 2013 | Mate et al. |
| 20130201487 | August 8, 2013 | Ossig et al. |
| 20130205606 | August 15, 2013 | Briggs et al. |
| 20130212889 | August 22, 2013 | Bridges et al. |
| 20130222816 | August 29, 2013 | Briggs et al. |
| 20130300740 | November 14, 2013 | Snyder et al. |
| 20140002608 | January 2, 2014 | Atwell et al. |
| 20140049784 | February 20, 2014 | Woloschyn et al. |
| 20140063489 | March 6, 2014 | Steffey et al. |
| 20140226190 | August 14, 2014 | Bridges et al. |
| 20140240690 | August 28, 2014 | Newman et al. |
| 20140362424 | December 11, 2014 | Bridges et al. |
| 2005200937 | September 2006 | AU |
| 2236119 | September 1996 | CN |
| 1307241 | August 2001 | CN |
| 2508896 | September 2002 | CN |
| 2665668 | December 2004 | CN |
| 1630804 | June 2005 | CN |
| 1630805 | June 2005 | CN |
| 1688867 | October 2005 | CN |
| 1735789 | February 2006 | CN |
| 1812868 | August 2006 | CN |
| 1818537 | August 2006 | CN |
| 1838102 | September 2006 | CN |
| 1839293 | September 2006 | CN |
| 1853084 | October 2006 | CN |
| 1926400 | March 2007 | CN |
| 101024286 | August 2007 | CN |
| 101156043 | April 2008 | CN |
| 101163939 | April 2008 | CN |
| 101371099 | February 2009 | CN |
| 101416024 | April 2009 | CN |
| 101484828 | July 2009 | CN |
| 201266071 | July 2009 | CN |
| 101506684 | August 2009 | CN |
| 101511529 | August 2009 | CN |
| 2216765 | April 1972 | DE |
| 3227980 | May 1983 | DE |
| 3245060 | July 1983 | DE |
| 3340317 | August 1984 | DE |
| 4027990 | February 1992 | DE |
| 4222642 | January 1994 | DE |
| 4340756 | June 1994 | DE |
| 4303804 | August 1994 | DE |
| 4445464 | July 1995 | DE |
| 4410775 | October 1995 | DE |
| 4412044 | October 1995 | DE |
| 29622033 | February 1997 | DE |
| 19543763 | May 1997 | DE |
| 19601875 | July 1997 | DE |
| 19607345 | August 1997 | DE |
| 19720049 | November 1998 | DE |
| 19811550 | September 1999 | DE |
| 19820307 | November 1999 | DE |
| 19850118 | May 2000 | DE |
| 19928958 | November 2000 | DE |
| 10114126 | October 2001 | DE |
| 10026357 | January 2002 | DE |
| 20208077 | May 2002 | DE |
| 10137241 | September 2002 | DE |
| 10155488 | May 2003 | DE |
| 10219054 | November 2003 | DE |
| 10232028 | February 2004 | DE |
| 10336458 | February 2004 | DE |
| 10244643 | April 2004 | DE |
| 20320216 | April 2004 | DE |
| 10304188 | August 2004 | DE |
| 10326848 | January 2005 | DE |
| 202005000983 | March 2005 | DE |
| 10361870 | July 2005 | DE |
| 102004015668 | September 2005 | DE |
| 102004015111 | October 2005 | DE |
| 102004028090 | December 2005 | DE |
| 103 61 870 | May 2006 | DE |
| 202006005643 | August 2006 | DE |
| 102004010083 | November 2006 | DE |
| 102005043931 | March 2007 | DE |
| 102005056265 | May 2007 | DE |
| 102006053611 | May 2007 | DE |
| 102005060967 | June 2007 | DE |
| 102006023902 | November 2007 | DE |
| 102006024534 | November 2007 | DE |
| 102006035292 | January 2008 | DE |
| 202006020299 | May 2008 | DE |
| 102007037162 | February 2009 | DE |
| 102008014274 | August 2009 | DE |
| 102008039838 | March 2010 | DE |
| 102005036929 | June 2010 | DE |
| 102008062763 | July 2010 | DE |
| 102009001894 | September 2010 | DE |
| 102009035336 | November 2010 | DE |
| 102009055988 | March 2011 | DE |
| 102010032726 | November 2011 | DE |
| 102010032725 | January 2012 | DE |
| 202011051975 | February 2013 | DE |
| 102012107544 | May 2013 | DE |
| 102012109481 | April 2014 | DE |
| 0546784 | June 1993 | EP |
| 0667549 | August 1995 | EP |
| 0727642 | August 1996 | EP |
| 0730210 | September 1996 | EP |
| 0614517 | March 1997 | EP |
| 0838696 | April 1998 | EP |
| 0949524 | October 1999 | EP |
| 1160539 | December 2001 | EP |
| 1189124 | March 2002 | EP |
| 0767357 | May 2002 | EP |
| 1310764 | May 2003 | EP |
| 1342989 | September 2003 | EP |
| 1347267 | September 2003 | EP |
| 1361414 | November 2003 | EP |
| 1452279 | September 2004 | EP |
| 1468791 | October 2004 | EP |
| 1056987 | April 2005 | EP |
| 1528410 | May 2005 | EP |
| 1669713 | June 2006 | EP |
| 1734425 | December 2006 | EP |
| 1429109 | April 2007 | EP |
| 1764579 | December 2007 | EP |
| 1878543 | January 2008 | EP |
| 1967930 | September 2008 | EP |
| 2003419 | December 2008 | EP |
| 2023077 | February 2009 | EP |
| 2042905 | April 2009 | EP |
| 2060530 | May 2009 | EP |
| 2068067 | June 2009 | EP |
| 2068114 | June 2009 | EP |
| 2108917 | October 2009 | EP |
| 2177868 | April 2010 | EP |
| 2259013 | December 2010 | EP |
| 2400261 | December 2011 | EP |
| 2603228 | March 1988 | FR |
| 2935043 | February 2010 | FR |
| 894320 | April 1962 | GB |
| 1112941 | May 1968 | GB |
| 2222695 | March 1990 | GB |
| 2255648 | November 1992 | GB |
| 2336493 | October 1999 | GB |
| 2341203 | March 2000 | GB |
| 2388661 | November 2003 | GB |
| 2420241 | May 2006 | GB |
| 2447258 | September 2008 | GB |
| 2452033 | February 2009 | GB |
| 5581525 | June 1955 | JP |
| 575584 | January 1982 | JP |
| 58171291 | January 1983 | JP |
| 5827264 | February 1983 | JP |
| S58171291 | October 1983 | JP |
| 59133890 | August 1984 | JP |
| 61062885 | March 1986 | JP |
| S61157095 | July 1986 | JP |
| 63135814 | June 1988 | JP |
| 0357911 | March 1991 | JP |
| 04115108 | April 1992 | JP |
| 04225188 | August 1992 | JP |
| 04267214 | September 1992 | JP |
| 0572477 | March 1993 | JP |
| 06313710 | November 1994 | JP |
| 1994313710 | November 1994 | JP |
| 06331733 | December 1994 | JP |
| 06341838 | December 1994 | JP |
| 074950 | January 1995 | JP |
| 07128051 | May 1995 | JP |
| 7210586 | August 1995 | JP |
| 07229963 | August 1995 | JP |
| 0815413 | January 1996 | JP |
| 0821714 | January 1996 | JP |
| 08129145 | May 1996 | JP |
| 08136849 | May 1996 | JP |
| 08262140 | October 1996 | JP |
| 0921868 | January 1997 | JP |
| 10213661 | August 1998 | JP |
| 1123993 | January 1999 | JP |
| 2001056275 | August 1999 | JP |
| 2000121724 | April 2000 | JP |
| 2000249546 | September 2000 | JP |
| 2000339468 | December 2000 | JP |
| 2001013001 | January 2001 | JP |
| 2001021303 | January 2001 | JP |
| 2011066211 | March 2001 | JP |
| 2001337278 | December 2001 | JP |
| 2003050128 | February 2003 | JP |
| 2003156330 | May 2003 | JP |
| 2003156562 | May 2003 | JP |
| 2003194526 | July 2003 | JP |
| 2003202215 | July 2003 | JP |
| 2003216255 | July 2003 | JP |
| 2003308205 | October 2003 | JP |
| 2004109106 | April 2004 | JP |
| 2004245832 | September 2004 | JP |
| 2004257927 | September 2004 | JP |
| 2004333398 | November 2004 | JP |
| 2004348575 | December 2004 | JP |
| 2005030937 | February 2005 | JP |
| 2005055226 | March 2005 | JP |
| 2005069700 | March 2005 | JP |
| 2005174887 | June 2005 | JP |
| 2005517908 | June 2005 | JP |
| 2005215917 | August 2005 | JP |
| 2005221336 | August 2005 | JP |
| 2005257510 | September 2005 | JP |
| 2006038683 | February 2006 | JP |
| 2006102176 | April 2006 | JP |
| 2006203404 | August 2006 | JP |
| 2006226948 | August 2006 | JP |
| 2006241833 | September 2006 | JP |
| 2006266821 | October 2006 | JP |
| 2006301991 | November 2006 | JP |
| 2007514943 | June 2007 | JP |
| 2007178943 | July 2007 | JP |
| 2008076303 | April 2008 | JP |
| 2008082707 | April 2008 | JP |
| 2008096123 | April 2008 | JP |
| 2008107286 | May 2008 | JP |
| 2008304220 | December 2008 | JP |
| 2009063339 | March 2009 | JP |
| 2009524057 | June 2009 | JP |
| 2009531674 | September 2009 | JP |
| 2009229255 | October 2009 | JP |
| 2009541758 | November 2009 | JP |
| 2010169405 | August 2010 | JP |
| 2013516928 | May 2013 | JP |
| 2013517508 | May 2013 | JP |
| 2013117417 | June 2013 | JP |
| 2013543970 | December 2013 | JP |
| 8801924 | March 1988 | WO |
| 8905512 | June 1989 | WO |
| 9208568 | May 1992 | WO |
| 9711399 | March 1997 | WO |
| 9808050 | February 1998 | WO |
| 9910706 | March 1999 | WO |
| 0014474 | March 2000 | WO |
| 0020880 | April 2000 | WO |
| 0026612 | May 2000 | WO |
| 0033149 | June 2000 | WO |
| 0034733 | June 2000 | WO |
| 0063645 | October 2000 | WO |
| 0063681 | October 2000 | WO |
| 0177613 | October 2001 | WO |
| 02084327 | October 2002 | WO |
| 02101323 | December 2002 | WO |
| 2004096502 | November 2004 | WO |
| 2005008271 | January 2005 | WO |
| 2005059473 | June 2005 | WO |
| 2005072917 | August 2005 | WO |
| 2005075875 | August 2005 | WO |
| 2005100908 | October 2005 | WO |
| 2006000552 | January 2006 | WO |
| 2006014445 | February 2006 | WO |
| 2006051264 | May 2006 | WO |
| 2006053837 | May 2006 | WO |
| 2007002319 | January 2007 | WO |
| 2007012198 | February 2007 | WO |
| 2007028941 | March 2007 | WO |
| 2007051972 | May 2007 | WO |
| 2007087198 | August 2007 | WO |
| 2007118478 | October 2007 | WO |
| 2007125081 | November 2007 | WO |
| 2007144906 | December 2007 | WO |
| 2008019856 | February 2008 | WO |
| 2008027588 | March 2008 | WO |
| 2008047171 | April 2008 | WO |
| 2008048424 | April 2008 | WO |
| 2008052348 | May 2008 | WO |
| 2008064276 | May 2008 | WO |
| 2008066896 | June 2008 | WO |
| 2008068791 | June 2008 | WO |
| 2008075170 | June 2008 | WO |
| 2008121073 | October 2008 | WO |
| 2008157061 | December 2008 | WO |
| 2009001165 | December 2008 | WO |
| 2009016185 | February 2009 | WO |
| 2009053085 | April 2009 | WO |
| 2009083452 | July 2009 | WO |
| 2009095384 | August 2009 | WO |
| 2009123278 | October 2009 | WO |
| 2009127526 | October 2009 | WO |
| 2009130169 | October 2009 | WO |
| 2009149740 | December 2009 | WO |
| 2010040742 | April 2010 | WO |
| 2010092131 | August 2010 | WO |
| 2010108089 | September 2010 | WO |
| 2010108644 | September 2010 | WO |
| 2010148525 | December 2010 | WO |
| 2011000435 | January 2011 | WO |
| 2011000955 | January 2011 | WO |
| 2011021103 | February 2011 | WO |
| 2011029140 | March 2011 | WO |
| 2011057130 | May 2011 | WO |
| 2011060899 | May 2011 | WO |
| 2011002908 | June 2011 | WO |
| 2011090829 | July 2011 | WO |
| 2011090895 | July 2011 | WO |
| 2012037157 | March 2012 | WO |
| 2012038446 | March 2012 | WO |
| 2012061122 | May 2012 | WO |
| 2012013525 | August 2012 | WO |
| 2012103525 | August 2012 | WO |
| 2012112683 | August 2012 | WO |
| 2012125671 | September 2012 | WO |
| 2013112455 | August 2013 | WO |
| 2013188026 | December 2013 | WO |
| 2013190031 | December 2013 | WO |
| 2014128498 | August 2014 | WO |
- Bijhold, Jurrien, et al., “Forensic Imaging—A Review: 2001 to 2004”, 14th International Forensic Science Symposium, Review Papers, Interpol—Lyon, Oct. 19-22, 2004, pp. 189-205.
- Decision Revoking the European Patent (Art. 101(3)(b) EPC) dated Aug. 14, 2013, filed in Opposition re Application No. 07 785 873.6/Patent No. 2 062 069, Proprietor: Faro Technologies, Inc., filed by Leica Geosystem AG on Feb. 5, 2013, 12 pages.
- Faro Laser Scanner LS, Recording Reality's Digital Fingerprint, The Measure of Success, Rev. Aug. 22, 2005.
- Faro Laserscanner LS, Presentation Forensic Package, Policeschool of Hessen, Wiesbaden, Germany, Dec. 14, 2005; Faro Technologies, Copyright 2008.
- Haag, et al., “Technical Overview and Application of 3D Laser Scanning for Shooting Reconstruction and Crime Scene Investigations”, Presented at the American Academy of Forensic Sciences Scientific Meeting, Washington, D.C., Feb. 21, 2008.
- Howard, et al., “Virtual Environments for Scene of Crime Reconstruction and Analysis”, Advanced Interfaces Group, Department of Computer Science, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK, Feb. 28, 2000.
- Ingensand, H., Dr., “Introduction to Geodetic Metrology”, “Einfuhrung in die Geodatische Messtechnik”, Federal Institute of Technology Zurich, 2004, with English translation.
- Langford, et al., “Practical Skills in Forensic Science”, Pearson Education Limited, Essex, England, First Published 2005, Forensic Chemistry.
- Leica Geosystems, FBI Crime Scene Case Study, Tony Grissim, Feb. 2006.
- Leica Geosystems, TruStory Forensic Analysis by Albuquerque Police Department, 2006.
- Leica TPS800 Performance Series—Equipment List, 2004.
- Provision of a copy of the minutes in accordance with Rule 124(4) EPC dated Aug. 14, 2013, filed in Opposition re Application No. 07 785 873.6/Patent No. 2 062 069, Proprietor: Faro Technologies, Inc., filed by Leica Geosystem AG on Feb. 5, 2013.
- Se, et al., “Instant Scene Modeler for Crime Scene Reconstruction”, MDA, Space Missions, Ontario, Canada, Copyright 2005, IEEE.
- The Scene, Journal of the Association for Crime Scene Reconstruction, Apr.-Jun. 2006, vol. 12, Issue 2.
- Huebner, Siegfried F., “Sniper Shooting Techniques, Schartschutzen-Schiesstechnik”, 1989, with English Translation.
- Davidson, A. et al., “MonoSLAM: Real-Time Single Camera SLAM”, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 29, No. 6, Jun. 1, 2007, pp. 1052-1067, XP011179664.
- Gebre, Biruk A., et al., “Remotely Operated and Autonomous Mapping System (ROAMS)”, Technologies for Practical Robot Applications, TEPRA 2009, IEEE International Conference on Nov. 9, 2009, pp. 173-178, XP031570394.
- Harrison A. et al., “High Quality 3D Laser Ranging Under General Vehicle Motion”, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, May 19-23, 2008, pp. 7-12, XP031340123.
- May, S. et al, “Robust 3D-Mapping with Time-of-Flight Cameras”, Intelligent Robots and Systems, IROS 2009, IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Oct. 10, 2009, pp. 1673-1678, XP031581042.
- Ohno, K. et al., “Real-Time Robot Trajectory Estimation and 3D Map Construction Using 3D Camera”, Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2006 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Oct. 1, 2006, pp. 5279-5285, XP031006974.
- Surmann, H. et al., “An Autonomous Mobile Robot with a 3D Laser Range Finder for 3D Exploration and Digitalization of Indoor Environments”, Robotics and Autonomous Systems, Elsevier Science Publishers, vol. 45, No. 3-4, Dec. 31, 2003, pp. 181-198.
- Yan, R., et al, “3D Point Cloud Map Construction Based on Line Segments with Two Mutually Perpendicular Laser Sensors”, 2013 13th International Conference on Control, Automation and Systems (ICCAS 2013), IEEE, Oct. 20, 2013, pp. 1114-1116.
- Ye, C. et al., “Characterization of a 2-D Laser Scanner for Mobile Robot Obstacle Negotiation” Proceedings / 2002 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, May 11-15, 2002, Washington, D.C., May 1, 2002, pp. 2512-2518, XP009169742.
- YK Cho, et al. “Light-weight 3D LADAR System for Construction Robotic Operations” (pp. 237-244); 26th International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction (ISARC 2009), Jun. 24, 2009.
- Williams, J.A., et al., Evaluation of a Novel Multiple Point Set Registration Algorithm, Copyright 2000, [Retrieved on Jan. 18, 2010 at 04:10 from IEEE Xplore].
- Hart, A., “Kinematic Coupling Interchangeability”, Precision Engineering, vol. 28, No. 1, Jan. 1, 2004, pp. 1-15, XP55005507, ISSN: 0141-6359, DOI: 10.1016/S0141-6359(03)00071-0.
- HYDROpro Navigation, Hydropgraphic Survey Software, Trimble, www.trimble.com, Copyright 1997-2003.
- Information on Electro-Optical Information Systems; EOIS 3D Mini-Moire C.M.M. Sensor for Non-Contact Measuring & Surface Mapping; Direct Dimensions, Jun. 1995.
- iQsun Laserscanner Brochure, 2 pages, Apr. 2005.
- It is Alive in the Lab, Autodesk University, Fun with the Immersion MicroScribe Laser Scanner, [online], [retrieved Nov. 29, 2011], http://labs.blogs.com/its—alive—in—the—lab/2007/11/fun-with-the-im.html; 3 pages.
- J. Geng “Structured-Light 3D Surface Imaging: A Tutorial,” Advances in Optics and Photonics 3; Mar. 31, 2011, pp. 128-160; IEEE Intelligent Transportation System Society; 2011 Optical Society of America.
- Jasiobedzki, Piotr, “Laser Eye—A New 3D Sensor for Active Vision”, SPIE—Sensor Fusion VI, vol. 2059, Sep. 7, 1993, pp. 316-321, XP00262856, Boston, U.S.A., Retrieved from the Internet: URL:http:.//scitation.aip.org/getpdf/servlet/Ge.
- Jasperneite, et al., Enhancements to the Time Synchronization Standard IEEE-1588 for a System of Cascaded Bridges, IEEE, 2004.
- JGeng “DLP-Based Structured Light 3D Imaging Technologies and Applications” (15 pages) Emerging Digital Micromirror Device Based Systems and Application III; edited by Michael R. Douglass, Patrick I. Oden, Proc. of SPIE, vol. 7932, 79320B; (2011) SPIE.
- Umeda, K., et al., Registration of Range and Color Images Using Gradient Constraints and Ran Intensity Images, Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR'04), Copyright 2010 IEEE. [Retrieved online Jan. 28, 2010—IEEE.
- Kreon Laser Scanners, Getting the Best in Cutting Edge 3D Digitizing Technology, B3-D MCAD Consulting/Sales [online], [retrieved Nov. 29, 2011], http://www.b3-d.com/Kreon.html.
- Laser Reverse Engineering with Microscribe, [online], [retrieved Nov. 29, 2011], http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8VRz—2aEJ4E&feature=PlayList&p=F63ABF74F30DC81B&playnext=1&playnext—from=PL&index=1.
- Leica Geosystems: “Leica Rugby 55 Designed for Interior Built for Construction”, Jan. 1, 2009, XP002660558, Retrieved from the Internet: URL:http://www.leica-geosystems.com/downloads123/zz/lasers/Rugby%2055/brochures/Leica—Rugby—55—brochure—en.pdf [re.
- Leica Rugby 55 Designed for Interior Built for Construction Brochure, Leica Geosystems, Heerbrugg, Switzerland, www.leica-geosystems.com.
- Merriam-Webster (m-w.com), “Interface”. 2012. http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/interface.
- Merriam-Webster (m-w.com), “Parts”. 2012. http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/parts.
- Merriam-Webster (m-w.com), “Traverse”. 2012. http://wvvw.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/traverse.
- MG Lee; “Compact 3D LIDAR based on optically coupled horizontal and vertical Scanning mechanism for the autonomous navigation of robots” (13 pages) vol. 8037; downloaded from http://proceedings.spiedigitallibrary.org/ on Jul. 2, 2013.
- MicroScan 3D User Guide, RSI GmbH, 3D Systems & Software, Oberursel, Germany, email: info@rsi-gmbh.de, Copyright RSI Roland Seifert Imaging GmbH 2008.
- Moog Components Group “Technical Brief; Fiber Optic Rotary Joints” Document No. 303 (6 pages) Mar. 2008; MOOG, Inc. 2008 Canada; Focal Technologies.
- Moog Components Group; “Fiber Optic Rotary Joints; Product Guide” (4 pages) Dec. 2010; MOOG, Inc. 2010.
- Non-Final Office Action, Issued Mar. 23, 2015.
- P Ben-Tzvi, et al “Extraction of 3D Images Using Pitch-Actuated 2D Laser Range Finder for Robotic Vision” (6 pages) BNSDOCID <XP 31840390A—1—>, Oct. 15, 2010.
- Trimble—Trimble SPS630, SPS730 and SPS930 Universal Total Stations, [on-line] http://www.trimble.com/sps630—730—930.shtml (1 of 4), [Retreived Jan. 26, 2010 8:50:29AM].
- Romer “Romer Absolute Arm Maximum Performance Portable Measurement” (Printed 2010); Hexagon Metrology, Inc., http://us:Romer.com; 2010.
- Surman et al. “An autonomous mobile robot with a 3D laser range finder for 3D exploration and digitalization of indoor environments.” Robotics and Autonomous Systems vol. 45 No. 3-4, Dec. 31, 2003, pp. 181-198. Amsterdamn, Netherlands.
- Willoughby, P., “Elastically Averaged Precisoin Alignment”, In: “Doctoral Thesis”, Jun. 1, 2005, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, XP55005620, abstract 1.1 Motivation, Chapter 3, Chapter 6.
- Romer “Romer Absolute Arm Product Brochure” (2010); Hexagon Metrology; www.hexagonmetrology.com; Hexagon AB 2010.
- Romer “Romer Measuring Arms Portable CMMs for R&D and shop floor” (Mar. 2009) Hexagon Metrology (16 pages).
- Romer Measuring Arms; Portable CMMs for the shop floor; 20 pages; Hexagon Metrology, Inc. (2009) http//us.Romer.com.
- RW Boyd “Radiometry and the Detection of Otpical Radiation” (pp. 20-23) 1983 Jon wiley & Sons, Inc.
- Sauter, et al., Towards New Hybrid Networks for Industrial Automation, IEEE, 2009.
- Spada, et al., IEEE 1588 Lowers Integration Costs in Continuous Flow Automated Production Lines, XP-002498255, ARC Insights, Insight # 2003-33MD&H, Aug. 20, 2003.
- International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/EP2007/005789 mailed Oct. 30, 2007.
Type: Grant
Filed: Nov 21, 2014
Date of Patent: Jan 19, 2016
Assignee: FARO TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (Lake Mary, FL)
Inventors: Juergen Gittinger (Ludwigsburg), Bernd-Dietmar Becker (Ludwigsburg), Reinhard Becker (Ludwigsburg)
Primary Examiner: Kenneth J Whittington
Application Number: 14/549,851
International Classification: G01C 3/08 (20060101); G01C 1/00 (20060101); G01C 15/06 (20060101); G01C 15/02 (20060101);
