Two-wheel self-balancing vehicle with independently movable foot placement sections

A two-wheel, self-balancing personal vehicle having independently movable foot placement sections. The foot placement sections have an associated wheel, sensor and motor and are independently self-balancing which gives the user independent control over the movement of each platform section by the magnitude and direction of tilt a user induces in a given platform section. Various embodiments are disclosed including those with a continuous housing, discrete platform sections and/or tapering platform sections.

Skip to: Description  ·  Claims  ·  References Cited  · Patent History  ·  Patent History
Description
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

The present application claims the benefit of provisional application No. 61/597,777, filed Feb. 12, 2012, for a Two-Wheeled Self-Balancing Vehicle by the inventor herein.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to two-wheel, self-balancing vehicles and, more specifically, to such vehicles with two platform sections or areas that are independently movable with respect to one another and that thereby provide independent control and/or drive of the wheel associated with the given platform section/area.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

A first group of prior art two-wheel self-balancing vehicles is represented by a product known commonly as the “Segway.” This product is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,302,230, issued to Sramek et al (the '230 patent). While a contribution in the field, the Segway and like devices are disadvantageous in that they are large, heavy and expensive, i.e., too heavy to be carried by a commuter or youth, too expensive for most to buy. Furthermore, turning is achieved through a handle bar structure that ascends from the platform upward toward the chest of a user. This tall steering structure is a trip hazard when a user makes an unplanned exit from the vehicle.

Another group of prior art two-wheel self-balancing vehicles has two platform sections, each associated with a given wheel, that tilt from side-to-side as a user leans left or right. The two platform sections move in a linked or “dependent” manner (for example, through a parallelogram frame, and not independently) and there is a single “vertical” axis for the platforms. When the axis is tilted directly forward or backward, both wheels drive at the same speed (as required for self-balancing). If a user leans to the side (tilts the “vertical” axis sideways), then the outside wheel is driven faster than the inside wheel to effect a turn toward the direction of the tilt.

These devices typically require a multi-component parallelogram structure to coordinate/link movement of the two platform sections and the wheels. Such componentry adds to the weight, bulk, complexity, and potential for mechanical failure of the device. Also, the turning radius is fairly large as one wheel is typically rotating around the other (moving in the same direction though at different speeds).

A need exists for a two-wheel self-balancing vehicle that provides independent wheel control, is light-weight and compact, is easy and safe to use, and that may be made in a cost-effective manner. A need also exits for a two-wheel self-balancing vehicle that is more maneuverable and more ergonomic (functioning more naturally with the bio-mechanics of a user's legs and body) than prior art devices.

Other prior art includes skateboards that have two platforms sections that are movable with respect to one another. Some have a shared shaft about which the two platform sections pivot, while others have a degree of flexibility in the platform. In both of these arrangements, the platform sections are arranged longitudinally, one primarily behind the other in the longitudinal line-of-direction of travel.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Accordingly, it is an object of the present invention to provide a two-wheel, self-balancing vehicle that overcomes the shortcomings of the prior art.

It is another object of the present invention to provide a two-wheel, self-balancing vehicle that has independently movable foot placement sections.

It is also an object of the present invention to provide such a two-wheel, self-balancing vehicle in which the independently movable foot placement sections are used by an operator to assert independent control over the driving of the wheel associated with the respective foot placement section.

These and related objects of the present invention are achieved by use of a two-wheel, self-balancing vehicle with independently movable foot placement sections as described herein.

The attainment of the foregoing and related advantages and features of the invention should be more readily apparent to those skilled in the art, after review of the following more detailed description of the invention taken together with the drawings.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a two-wheel, self-balancing vehicle with independently movable platform sections in accordance with the present invention.

FIG. 2 is a block diagram of components within the vehicle of FIG. 1.

FIG. 3 is a bottom perspective view of another embodiment of a two-wheel, self-balancing vehicle with independently movable platform sections in accordance with the present invention.

FIGS. 4-5 are a top perspective view and a bottom perspective view of another embodiment of a two-wheel, self-balancing vehicle with independently movable platform sections in accordance with the present invention.

 DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Referring to FIG. 1, is a perspective view of a two-wheel, self-balancing vehicle 100 with independently movable platform sections in accordance with the present invention is shown.

Vehicle 100 may have a first and a second platform section 110,130. Each platform section 110,130 may include a housing formed of a bottom housing member 111,131 and a top housing member 112,132. The top housing members may have a foot placement section or area 113,133 formed integrally therewith or affixed thereon. The foot placement section is preferably of sufficient size to receive the foot of a user and may include a tread or the like for traction and/or comfort.

The housing may be formed of metal, sturdy plastic or other suitable material. The housing members may be molded and incorporate strengthening reinforcements, and be shaped to receive and “nest” the internal components (discussed below) of the vehicle. The bottom and top housing sections are formed complementarily so that after the internal components are installed, the top housing section is fitted onto the bottom housing section and secured with screws or other fasteners. FIG. 1 illustrates holes 161, through which the fasteners are inserted.

Each platform section includes a wheel 115,135, and each wheel preferably has an axle 116,136 and motorized hub assembly 117,137 (shown in FIG. 2). Motorized hub assemblies are known in the art.

Referring to FIG. 2, a block diagram of components within vehicle 100 in accordance with the invention is shown. The dot-dash line represents a rough outline of the housing members. Each platform section preferably includes a position sensor 120,140, which may be a gyroscopic sensor, for independent measurement of the position of the respective platform section. The sensors are preferably mounted on circuit boards 121,141 that may be attached to the interior of the respective bottom housings. Sensed position information from sensor 120,140 is used to drive the corresponding motor 117,137 and wheel 115,135. The control logic for translating position data to motor drive signals may be centralized or split between the two platform sections. For example, control logic 150 may be electrically connected to sensors 120,140 and to drive motors 117,137, with electrical conduits connecting through the connecting shaft 170 between sensor 140, control logic 150, and drive motor 137.

Alternatively, a separate processor/control logic 151 may be provided in the second platform section 130. Logic 151, in this case, would be is connect connected directly to sensor 140 and drive motor 137 and generate generates drive signals to motor 137 (and wheel 135) based on data from sensor 140.

Communication between these components is primarily in the direction of data from the sensor and drive signals to the motor. However, communication in the other direction may include start signals (ie i.e., to the sensor), status signals (ie i.e., from the motor indicating an unsafe condition (e.g., excessive rpm), or a motor/drive failure or irregularity). This information, in addition to battery information, etc., could be communicated back to a user via lights or another interface, or communicated wirelessly (e.g., blue-tooth) from the vehicle to a hand-held device such as a mobile phone. In addition, if the platform sections have separate and independent control logic 150,151, these processing units may still share information with one another, such as status, safe operation information, etc.

The two platform sections 110,130 are movably coupled to one another. FIG. 2 illustrates a shaft 170 about which they may rotate (or pivot with respect to one another). Brackets 164 and flange brackets 165 may secure the shaft to the platform sections, with the flange brackets preferably configured to prevent or reduce the entry of dirt or moisture within the housings. Shaft 170 may be hollow in part and thereby allowing for the passage of conduits therethrough. Pivoting or rotating shaft arrangements are known in the art, and others may be used without deviating from the present invention as long as the foot placement sections may move independently.

Since the platform sections may rotate or pivot with respect to one another, the left section 110, for example, may tilt forward while the right section tilts backward. This would cause the wheels to be driven in opposite directions, causing a user to spin-in-place or “pirouette” much like a figure skater. Alternatively, the platform wheels could be tilted in the same direction, but one platform more than the other. This would cause the wheel associated with the more steeply tilted platform to drive faster, in turn causing the vehicle to turn. The sharpness of the turn could be readily adjusted by the user based on the relative tilt of the platform sections.

This leg movement to control turning is a very ergonomic and natural movement, akin to skiing and other gliding/sliding activities.

The rotating shaft 170 may also include a bias mechanism integral with the flange bracket 165 or otherwise configured to return the platform section to an even level in the absence of displacement from a riders weight.

Each platform section 110,130 may also include a platform or “shut-off” sensor 119,139 that detects when a user is standing of on the platform. When a user falls off, the absence of the rider is sensed and the control logic, in response, stops driving the wheels such that the vehicle comes to a stop (and does not carry on rider less riderless). In the absence of such a shut-off sensor, the vehicle would still stop rather soon as the wheels will be driven to a self-balancing position for their respective sections bringing the device to rest.

Referring to FIG. 3, a bottom perspective view of another embodiment of a two-wheel, self-balancing vehicle 200 with independently movable platform sections in accordance with the present invention is shown. Vehicle 200 may include first and second platform section 210,230 that are formed of bottom 211,231 and top 212,232 housing sections, similar to those in vehicle 100 above.

Each platform section 110,130 includes a wheel 215,235 which is respectively driven by a motorized hub 217,237 and an associated position sensor 220,240. Control logic 250 receives the sensed position information and drives the associated wheel toward self-balancing. As discussed above, the control logic 250 may be independent, provided in each platform section, or centralized, provided in one section. Regardless, the driving of each wheel is based on the position sensed by the sensor associated with that wheel.

A pivoting shaft or other arrangement may be used to movably/rotatably join the two platform sections.

Referring to FIGS. 4-5, a top perspective view and a bottom perspective view of another embodiment of a two-wheel, self-balancing vehicle with independently movable platform sections 300 in accordance with the present invention is shown. Vehicle 300 is similar to the other vehicles herein, yet instead of a pivoting or rotating connection between platform sections, the frame or housing is made of a sturdy yet sufficiently flexible material that the two foot placement sections are effectively first and second platform sections that move independently with respect to each other for independent control of wheels 315,335.

Vehicle 300 may include a bottom 311 and a top 312 housing sections. These may be made of a flexible steel or durable flexible plastic or the like. The two sections are preferably configured to receive the internal components. They are preferably complementary in shape and may be secured by fasteners from below. The top housing may include or have attached to it a rubber coating or surface or the like in the foot placement areas 313,333 to increase traction and/or comfort with the foot of a user.

The internal components may include position sensors for both sections 320,340, hub motors 317,337, and control logic 350 for independently driving wheels 315,335 toward a self-balancing position based on position information sensor sensed by their respective sensors 320,340. These components may be the same or similar to those discussed above for vehicles 100 and 200 (FIGS. 1-3).

While the invention has been described in connection with specific embodiments thereof, it will be understood that it is capable of further modification, and this application is intended to cover any variations, uses, or adaptations of the invention following, in general, the principles of the invention and including such departures from the present disclosure as come within known or customary practice in the art to which the invention pertains and as may be applied to the essential features hereinbefore set forth, and as fall within the scope of the invention and the limits of the appended claims.

Claims

1. A two-wheel, self-balancing vehicle device, comprising:

a first foot placement section and a second foot placement section that are coupled to one another and are independently movable with respect to one another rotatable along an axis passing through a first wheel and a second wheel;
a said first wheel associated with the first foot placement section and a said second wheel associated with the second foot placement section, the first and second wheels being spaced apart and substantially parallel to one another;
a first position sensor and a first drive motor configured to drive the first wheel, a second position sensor and a second drive motor configured to drive the second wheel; and
control logic that drives the first wheel toward self-balancing the first foot placement section in response to position data from the first sensor and that drives the second wheel toward self-balancing the second foot placement section in response to position data from the second foot placement section.

2. The device of claim 1, wherein the first foot placement section and the second foot placement section are rotatably coupled to one another.

3. The device of claim 1, wherein the first foot placement section and the second foot placement section are positioned substantially linearly between the first and second wheel.

4. The device of claim 1, wherein said first and second foot placement sections are mounted to a frame that is sufficiently flexible that the first and second foot placement platforms can move independently with respect to one another under the weight of a user.

5. The device of claim 1, further comprising:

a first housing section on which the first foot placement section is provided, the first housing section housing the first sensor and first drive motor; and
a second housing section on which the second foot placement section is provided, the second housing section housing the second sensor and second drive motor.

6. The device of claim 5, wherein the control logic include a first control logic controlling the first drive motor located in the first housing section and a second control logic controlling the second drive motor located in the second housing section.

7. The device of claim 5, wherein the first drive wheel extends from the first housing section on an end substantially opposite where the first housing section is coupled to the second housing section, and the second drive wheel extends from the second housing section on an end substantially opposite where the second housing section is coupled to the first housing section.

8. The device of claim 1, further comprising a platform sensor provided at at least one of the first and second foot placement sections that detects when a user is standing on that foot placement section.

9. The device of claim 1, further comprising a bias mechanism for returning the two independently movable first and second foot placement sections toward alignment in the absence of a force by a user displacing the two foot placement sections from alignment.

10. A two-wheel self-balancing vehicle device, comprising:

a first foot placement section and a second foot placement section that are coupled to one another and are independently rotatable along an axis passing through a first wheel and a second wheel;
said first wheel associated with the first foot placement section and said second wheel associated with the second foot placement section, the first and second wheels being spaced apart and substantially parallel to one another;
a first position sensor and a first drive motor configured to drive the first wheel a second position sensor and a second drive motor configured to drive the second wheel; and
control logic that drives the first wheel toward self-balancing the first foot placement section in response to position data from the first sensor and that drives the second wheel toward self-balancing the second foot placement section in response to position data from the second sensor.

11. The device of claim 10, wherein the first foot placement section and the second foot placement section are positioned substantially linearly between the first and second wheel.

12. The device of claim 10, wherein said first and second foot placement sections are mounted to a frame that is sufficiently flexible that the first and second foot placement platforms can move independently with respect to one another under the weight of a user.

13. The device of claim 10, further comprising:

a first housing section on which the first foot placement section is provided, the first housing section housing the first sensor and first drive motor; and
a second housing section on which the second foot placement section is provided, the second housing section housing the second sensor and second drive motor.

14. The device of claim 13, wherein the control logic include a first control logic controlling the first drive motor located in the first housing section and a second control logic controlling the second drive motor located in the second housing section.

15. The device of claim 13, wherein the first drive wheel extends from the first housing section on an end substantially opposite where the first housing section is coupled to the second housing section, and the second drive wheel extends from the second housing section on an end substantially opposite where the second housing section is coupled to the first housing section.

16. The device of claim 10, further comprising a platform sensor provided at at least one of the first and second foot placement sections that detects when a user is standing on that foot placement section.

17. The device of claim 10, further comprising a bias mechanism for returning the two independently movable first and second foot placement sections toward alignment in the absence of a force by a user displacing the two foot placement sections from alignment.

Referenced Cited
U.S. Patent Documents
6302230 October 16, 2001 Kamen et al.
6367817 April 9, 2002 Kamen et al.
6538411 March 25, 2003 Field et al.
6581714 June 24, 2003 Kamen et al.
6651763 November 25, 2003 Kamen et al.
6920947 July 26, 2005 Kamen et al.
7023330 April 4, 2006 Kamen et al.
7083178 August 1, 2006 Potter
7090040 August 15, 2006 Kamen et al.
7195259 March 27, 2007 Gang
7275607 October 2, 2007 Kamen et al.
7338056 March 4, 2008 Chen
7363993 April 29, 2008 Ishii
7367572 May 6, 2008 Jiang
7467681 December 23, 2008 Hiramatsu
7479872 January 20, 2009 Cedarbaum
7481291 January 27, 2009 Nishikawa
D601922 October 13, 2009 Imai et al.
7740099 June 22, 2010 Field et al.
7775534 August 17, 2010 Chen et al.
7783392 August 24, 2010 Oikawa
7857088 December 28, 2010 Field et al.
7958956 June 14, 2011 Kakinuma et al.
8014923 September 6, 2011 Ishii et al.
8028777 October 4, 2011 Kakinuma et al.
8047556 November 1, 2011 Jang et al.
8113524 February 14, 2012 Karpman
8157274 April 17, 2012 Chen
8170780 May 1, 2012 Field et al.
8225891 July 24, 2012 Takenaka et al.
8408565 April 2, 2013 An
8459668 June 11, 2013 Yoon
8467941 June 18, 2013 Field et al.
8490723 July 23, 2013 Heinzmann et al.
8606468 December 10, 2013 Kosaka
8738278 May 27, 2014 Chen
8978791 March 17, 2015 Ha et al.
20040005958 January 8, 2004 Kamen et al.
20040262871 December 30, 2004 Schreuder et al.
20060202439 September 14, 2006 Kahlert et al.
20060260857 November 23, 2006 Kakinuma et al.
20070273118 November 29, 2007 Conrad
20080029985 February 7, 2008 Chen
20080147281 June 19, 2008 Ishii et al.
20090032323 February 5, 2009 Kakinuma et al.
20090078485 March 26, 2009 Gutsch et al.
20090105908 April 23, 2009 Casey et al.
20090115149 May 7, 2009 Wallis et al.
20090200746 August 13, 2009 Yamamoto
20090315293 December 24, 2009 Kosaka
20100025139 February 4, 2010 Kosaka et al.
20100114468 May 6, 2010 Field et al.
20100121538 May 13, 2010 Ishii et al.
20100222994 September 2, 2010 Field et al.
20100225080 September 9, 2010 Smith
20100237645 September 23, 2010 Trainer
20110131759 June 9, 2011 An
20110209929 September 1, 2011 Heinzmann et al.
20110220427 September 15, 2011 Chen
20110221160 September 15, 2011 Shaw
20110238247 September 29, 2011 Yen et al.
20110282532 November 17, 2011 Kosaka et al.
20120035809 February 9, 2012 Kosaka
20120205176 August 16, 2012 Ha et al.
20120239284 September 20, 2012 Field et al.
20120290162 November 15, 2012 Stevens et al.
20130032422 February 7, 2013 Chen
20130032423 February 7, 2013 Chen
20130105239 May 2, 2013 Fung
20130228385 September 5, 2013 Chen
Foreign Patent Documents
100431906 November 2008 CN
101353070 January 2009 CN
101920728 December 2010 CN
101920728 December 2010 CN
301604610 July 2011 CN
202201103 April 2012 CN
10251663 June 2012 CN
102514662 June 2012 CN
102514662 June 2012 CN
102602481 July 2012 CN
1791609 November 2011 EP
2004359094 December 2004 JP
2005094898 April 2005 JP
2005094898 April 2005 JP
2005335471 December 2005 JP
2006001385 January 2006 JP
2006008013 January 2006 JP
3981733 September 2007 JP
2010030436 February 2010 JP
2010030437 February 2010 JP
2010030438 February 2010 JP
2010030568 February 2010 JP
2010030569 February 2010 JP
2010035330 February 2010 JP
Other references
  • Decision Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review under 37 C.F.R. 42.108, Petravick et al., Administrative Patent Judges, Inter Partes Review No. IPR2016-01778, Mar. 16, 2017, pp. 1-20.
  • Sasaki, Makiko et al., Steering Control of the Personal Riding-type Wheeled Mobile Platform (PMP), IEEE, International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Dec. 5, 2005, pp. 3821-3826, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
  • Initial Determination on Violation of Section 337 and Recommended Determination on Remedy and Bond, ITC Case No. 337-TA-1000, May 26, 2017, pp. 1-93.
  • U.S. Appl. No. 61/597,777, filed Feb. 12, 2012, Applicant: Shane Chen, 8 pages.
  • Abeygunawardhana et al., Vibration Suppression of Two-Wheel Mobile Manipulator Using Resonance-Ratio-Control-Based Null-Space Control, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 57, No. 12, pp. 4137-4146 (2010).
  • Kim et al., Development of a Two-Wheeled Mobile Tilting & Balancing (MTB) Robot, 2011 11th International Conference on Control, Automation and Systems (ICCAS), Gyeonggi-do, 2011, pp. 1-6.
  • Azizan et al., Fuzzy Control Based on LMI Approach and Fuzzy Interpretation of the Rider Input for Two Wheeled Balancing Human Transporter, 2010 8th IEEE International Conference on Control and Automation, Xiamen, 2010, pp. 192-197.
  • Cardozo et al., Prototype for a Self-Balanced Personal Transporter, 2012 Workshop on Engineering Applications (WEA), Bogota, 2012, pp. 1-6.
  • Chiu et al., Design and implement of the self-dynamic controller for two-wheel transporter, 2006 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, Vancouver, BC, 2006, pp. 480-483.
  • Tsai et al., Intelligent Adaptive Motion Control Using Fuzzy Basis Function Networks for Self-Balancing Two-Wheeled Transporters, 2010 IEEE Conference on Fuzzy Systems, Barcelona, 2010 pp. 1-6.
  • Choi et al., Four and Two Wheel Transformable Dynamic Mobile Platform, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Shanghai, pp. 1-4.
  • Clark, et al. “Edgar, A Self-Balancing Scooter Final Report” (2005). (Divided in to 2 parts for submission).
  • Coelho et al., Development of a Mobile Two-Wheel Balancing Platform for Autonomous Applications, 15th International conference on Mechatronics and Machine Vision in Practice, Auckland, 2008, pp. 575-580.
  • Rebuttal Expert Report of William Singhose, Ph.D., on Claim Construction Issues (dated Aug. 10, 2016), including all attachments thereto and exhibits thereto.
  • Sasaki et al., Forward and Backward Motion Control of Personal Riding-type Wheeled Mobile Platform, Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, vol. 4, pp. 3331-3336.
  • Li et al., A coaxial couple wheeled equilibrium robot with T-S fuzzy equilibrium control, Industrial Robot: An International Journal, vol. 38, Issue 3, pp. 292-300, 2011.
  • Li et al., Controller Design of a Two-Wheeled Inverted Pendulum Mobile Robot, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation, Takamatsu, pp. 7-12.
  • Seo et al., Simulation of Attitude Control of a Wheeled Inverted Pendulum, International Conference on Control, Automation, and Systems, 2007, Seoul, pp. 2264-2269.
  • Li et al., Mechanical Design and Dynamic Modeling of a Two-Wheeled Inverted Pendulum Mobile Robot, Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE International Conference on Automation and Logistics, Jinan, 2007, pp. 1614-1619.
  • Lin et al., Adaptive Robust Self-Balancing and Steering of a Two-Wheeled Human Transportation Vehicle, 62 J Intell Robot Syst, pp. 103-123 (2011) (first published online Aug. 27, 2010).
  • Quick, Darren, Nissan joins personal mobility field with Segway-skis, www.gizmag.com, Oct. 27 2009.
  • Sasaki, Makiko, et al., Steering Control of the Personal Riding-type Wheeled Mobile Platform (PMP), 2005 IEEE, International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Aug. 2005, pp. 54-60.
  • Hornyak, Tim, Robot roller skates less bulky than Segway, www.cnet.com, Nov. 27, 2009.
  • Kim, Sangtae et al., Development of a Two-Wheeled Mobile Tilting & Balancing (MTB) Robot, 11th International conference on Control, Automation and Systems (ICCAS), Oct. 26-29, 2011, pp. 1-6, Kintex, Gyeonggi-do, Korea.
  • Quirk, Trevor, “Why you shouldn't expect a hoverboard any time soon,” Christian Science Monitor, URL=https://www.csmonitor.com/Science/2012/0213/Why-you-shouldn-t-expect-a-hoverboard-any-time-soon, Feb. 13, 2012, Web. Jul. 5, 2016, pp. 1-5.
  • Quick, Darren, Nissan Joins Personal Mobility Field with “Segway-skis”, http:///www.gizmag.com/nissan-personal-mobility-device/13210/, New Atlas, Urban Transport, Oct. 27, 2009, pp. 1-9.
  • Bash, John D., “How Do Self Balancing Scooters Work?” URL=https://bestelectrichoverboard.com/hoverboard-faq/how-do-self-balancing-scooters-work/, Exhibit 2012, Inter Partes Review No. IPR2016-01778, Nov. 12, 2015, Web. Oct. 8, 2016, pp. 1-7.
  • Wells, Georgia, “What It's Like to Have Wheels for Feet: Test Driving the Latest ‘Hoverboards,’” The Wall Street Journal, URL=https://www.wsj.com/articles/what-its-like-to-have-wheels-for-feet-test-driving-the-latest-hoverboards-1446055640, Exhibit 2011, Oct. 28, 2015, Web. Oct. 8, 2016, Inter Partes Review No. IPR2016-01778, pp. 1-5.
  • Google Trends—Web Search Interest: hoverboard—United States, Jan. 2004-Jul. 2016, Jul. 5, 2016, Exhibit 2010, Inter Partes Review No. IPR2016-01778, pp. 1-6.
  • Banks, Alec, “Everything You Need to Know About the ‘Hoverboard’ Craze,” URL=http://www.highsnobiety.com/2015/10/14/hoverboard-history/, Exhibit 2004, Inter Partes Review No. IPR2016-01778, Oct. 14, 2015, Web. Jul. 25, 2016, pp. 1-13.
  • Detrick, Ben, “Celebrities on Scooters (Catch Them if You Can),” The New York Times, URL=https://www.nytimes.com/2015/08/16/fashion/cara-delevingne-justin-bieber-meek-mill-stephen-curry-on-scooters.html, Exhibit 2005, Inter Partes Review No. IPR2016-01778, Aug. 15, 2015, Web. Jul. 25, 2016, pp. 1-6.
  • Murphy, Mike, “Everything you've ever wanted to know about the hoverboard craze,” Quartz, URL=https://qz.com/495935/everything-youve-ever-wanted-to-know-about-the-hoverboard-craze/, Exhibit 2006, Inter Partes Review No. IPR2016-01778, Nov. 11, 2015, Web. Jul. 25, 2016, pp. 1-12.
  • Kantrowitz, Alex, Everything You Need to Know About the Hoverboard Craze, BuzzFeed News, URL=https://www.buzzfeed.com/alexkantrowitz/a-crash-course-in-hoverboards?utm_term=.qwV3MnB77#.debmbaMjj, Exhibit 2007, Inter Partes Review No. IPR2016-01778, Aug. 27, 2015, Web. Dec. 26, 2016, pp. 1-9.
  • Hoverguru, http://hoverguru.com/, “‘They're completely different products’: IO Hawk President John Soibatian not concerned about infringing on Hovertrax patent,” URL=http://hoverguru.com/posts/theyre-completely-different-products-io-hawk-president-john-soibatian-not-concerned-about-infringing-on-hovertrax-patent/, Exhibit 2008, Inter Partes Review No. IPR2016-01778, Aug. 31, 2015, pp. 1-5.
  • Robinson, Mandy, “Hoverboard Black Friday Sales: Best Places to Get One Before Christmas,” URL=https://www.inquisitr.com/2589773/hoverboard-black-friday-sales-best-places-to-get-one-before-christmas/, Gadgets, inquisitr.com, Exhibit 2009, Inter Partes Review No. IPR2016-01778, Nov. 24, 2015, Web. Jul. 27, 2016, pp. 1-8.
  • Declaration of W. Mark Richter in Support of Patent Owner Preliminary Response, Inter Partes Review No. IPR2016-01778, Dec. 27, 2016, pp. 1-8.
  • Complainants' (Razor USA LLC, Inventist, Inc., and Shane Chen), Documents in Support of Request to commence an investigation, ITC Case No. 337-TA-1000, Exhibit 1010, Mar. 21, 2016, pp. 1-132. [References split in to 6 parts].
  • Declaration of Dr. Gerald Cook, Exhibit 1008, Inter Partes Review No. IPR2016-01778, Sep. 13, 2016, pp. 1-98.
  • Complainants' (Razor USA LLC, Inventist, Inc., and Shane Chen) Initial Claim Construction Brief, ITC Case No. 337- TA-1000, Aug. 19, 2016, pp. 1-217.
  • Respondents' (Hangzhou Chic Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd, Swagway, LLC, Modell's Sporting Goods, Inc., Newegg, Inc., Powerboard a.k.a. Optimum Trading Co., United Integral, Inc. dba Skque Products, Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. and Alibaba.com Ltd., and Jetson Electric Bikes LLC) Opening Claim Construction Brief, ITC Case No. 337-TA-1000, Aug. 19, 2016, pp. 1-229. [References split in to 4 parts].
  • Claim Construction Brief of the Commission Investigative Staff, ITC Case No. 337-TA-1000, Aug. 29, 2016, pp. 1-26.
  • Complainants' (Razor USA LLC, Inventist, Inc., and Shane Chen) Rebuttal Claim Construction Brief, ITC Case No. 337-TA-1000, Sep. 2, 2016, pp. 1-24.
  • Respondents' (Hangzhou Chic Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd, Swagway, LLC, Modell's Sporting Goods, Inc., Newegg, Inc., Powerboard a.k.a. Optimum Trading Co., United Integral, Inc. dba Skque Products, Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. and Alibaba.com Ltd., and Jetson Electric Bikes LLC) Rebuttal Claim Construction Brief, ITC Case No. 337-TA-1000, Sep. 2, 2016, pp. 1-48.
  • Notice of Institution of Investigation, ITC Case No. 337-TA-1000, May 20, 2016, pp. 1-48.
  • Patent Owner Preliminary Response, Inter Partes Review No. IPR2016-01778, Dec. 27, 2016, pp. 1-51.
  • Complainants' (Razor USA LLC, Inventist, Inc., and Shane Chen) Petition for Review, ITC Case No. 337-TA-1000, Jun. 12, 2017, pp. 1-40.
  • Contingent Petition for Review of Initial Determination by Respondents Swagway, LLC, Modell's Sporting Goods, Inc., and Newegg, Inc., ITC Case No. 337-TA-1000, Jun. 12, 2017, pp. 1-39.
  • Respondent Hangzhou Chic Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd's Contingent Petition for Review, ITC Case No. 337-TA-1000, Jun. 12, 2017, pp. 1-22.
  • Petition of the Office of Unfair Import Investigations for Review In-Part of the Initial Determination on Violation, ITC Case No. 337-TA-1000, Jun. 12, 2017, pp. 1-28.
  • Jetson's Opposition to Petitions Filed by the ITC Attorney and Razor, ITC Case No. 337-TA-1000, Jun. 20, 2017, pp. 1-16.
  • Complainants' Opposition to Respondents' Contingent Petitions for Review Filed by (1) Hangzhou Chic Intelligent Co., Ltd., and (2) Respondents Swagway, LLC, Modell's Sporting Goods, Inc., and Newegg, Inc., ITC Case No. 337-TA-1000, Jun. 20, 2017, pp. 1-62.
  • Combined Response of the Office of Unfair Import Investigations to Complainants' Petition for Review and Respondents' Contingent Petitions for Review of the Initial Determination on Violation, ITC Case No. 337-TA-1000, Jun. 20, 2017, pp. 1-48.
  • Response to Complainants' and Staff's Petitions for Review of Initial Determination by Respondents Swagway, LLC, Modell's Sporting Goods, Inc., Hangzhou Chic Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd., and Newegg.com, Inc., ITC Case No. 337-TA-1000, Jun. 20, 2017, pp. 1-34.
  • Alibaba's Response to the Petitions for Review, ITC Case No. 337-TA-1000, Jun. 20, 2017, pp. 1-7.
  • Order 25: Construing the Terms of the Asserted Claims of the Patent at Issue, ITC Case No. 337-TA-1000, Nov. 1, 2016, pp. 1-26.
  • Consolidated Initial Proposed Claim Constructions, ITC Case No. 337-TA-1000, Jul. 19, 2016, pp. 1-8.
  • Respondents Powerboard LLC's and Jetson Electric Bikes, LLC's Motion for Summary Determination of Non-Infringement, ITC Case No. 337-TA-1000, Dec. 12, 2016, pp. 1-30.
  • Respondent Hangzhou Chic Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd.'s Objections and Responses to Compliantants' First Set of Contention Interrogatories, ITC Case No. 337-TA-1000, Sep. 9, 2016, pp. 1-208.
  • Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,738,278, Inter Partes Review No. IPR2016-01778, Sep. 13, 2016, pp. 1-73.
  • Appellants' (Razor USA LLC, Inventist, Inc. and Shane Chen), Non-Confidential Brief, Appeal from ITC Case No. 337-TA-1000, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit No. 17-2591, Jan. 8, 2018, 174 pages. [Divided into 4 Parts].
Patent History
Patent number: RE46964
Type: Grant
Filed: May 26, 2016
Date of Patent: Jul 24, 2018
Assignee: Solowheel Inc. (Camas, WA)
Inventor: Shane Chen (Camas, WA)
Primary Examiner: Sam Rimell
Application Number: 15/165,654
Classifications
Current U.S. Class: Special Purpose Vehicle (D12/1)
International Classification: B62K 11/00 (20060101);