Patents Assigned to Advanced Biometric Controls, LLC
  • Patent number: 9160536
    Abstract: Authenticity and responsiveness of evidence (e.g., biometric evidence) may be validated without regard for whether there is direct control over a sensor that acquired the evidence. In some implementations, only a data block containing evidence that is (1) appended with a server-generated challenge (e.g., a nonce) and (2) signed or encrypted by the sensor may validate that the evidence is responsive to a current request and belongs to a current session. In some implementations, trust may be established and/or enhanced due to one or more security features (e.g., anti-spoofing, anti-tampering, and/or other security features) being collocated with the sensor at the actual sampling site.
    Type: Grant
    Filed: November 30, 2011
    Date of Patent: October 13, 2015
    Assignee: Advanced Biometric Controls, LLC
    Inventor: Arthur W. Joyce, III
  • Patent number: 9066125
    Abstract: An electronic display is provided for facilitating authentication. The display may integrate one or more of a camera, microphone, fingerprint sensor, card reader, touch screen, and communication interface to collect biometric and other identification information to authenticate a user requesting access to the display. An integrated proximity or motion sensor may be used to track presence of the user. The user may be required to re-authenticate his identity after an absence from the display. The display may be a standalone device or may cooperate with an external computing device. The display may be configured to verify its identity to the external computing device. The display may be configured to perform its own authentication and authorization procedures before presenting content from an external device.
    Type: Grant
    Filed: February 10, 2012
    Date of Patent: June 23, 2015
    Assignee: Advanced Biometric Controls, LLC
    Inventors: Christopher A. Sands, Arthur W. Joyce, III
  • Publication number: 20130138964
    Abstract: Authenticity and responsiveness of evidence (e.g., biometric evidence) may be validated without regard for whether there is direct control over a sensor that acquired the evidence. In some implementations, only a data block containing evidence that is (1) appended with a server-generated challenge (e.g., a nonce) and (2) signed or encrypted by the sensor may validate that the evidence is responsive to a current request and belongs to a current session. In some implementations, trust may be established and/or enhanced due to one or more security features (e.g., anti-spoofing, anti-tampering, and/or other security features) being collocated with the sensor at the actual sampling site.
    Type: Application
    Filed: November 30, 2011
    Publication date: May 30, 2013
    Applicant: Advanced Biometric Controls, LLC
    Inventor: Arthur W. JOYCE, III
  • Publication number: 20130111222
    Abstract: Authenticity and responsiveness of evidence (e.g., biometric evidence) may be validated without regard for whether there is direct control over a sensor that acquired the evidence. In some implementations, only a data block containing evidence that is (1) appended with a server-generated challenge (e.g., a nonce) and (2) signed by the sensor may validate that the evidence is responsive to a current request and belongs to a current session. In some implementations, trust may be established and/or enhanced due to one or more security features (e.g., anti-spoofing, anti-tampering, and/or other security features) being collocated with the sensor at the actual sampling site.
    Type: Application
    Filed: October 31, 2011
    Publication date: May 2, 2013
    Applicant: Advanced Biometric Controls, LLC
    Inventor: Arthur W. JOYCE, III