Abstract: Method for transformation between a discussion document and an online discussion forum including: dividing the discussion document into several portions, according to original headings contained in the discussion document and for each of the plurality of portions, creating a sub-forum of the online discussion forum, in a forum database, the description of which being a text of a respective heading; creating a topic for each paragraph and sub-heading of lower hierarchy; inserting a text of each paragraph into a discussion database, formatted according to rules of the online discussion forum; modifying the online discussion forum via a discussion forum software; creating a new version of the discussion document including the original headings; parsing the adapted online discussion forum starting with a first sub-forum; inserting titles of lower level sub-forums in the new version of the discussion document as sub-headings; and outputs the new version of the discussion document.

Abstract: Method for transformation between a discussion document and an online discussion forum including: dividing the discussion document into several portions, according to original headings contained in the discussion document and for each of the plurality of portions, creating a sub-forum of the online discussion forum, in a forum database, the description of which being a text of a respective heading; creating a topic for each paragraph and sub-heading of lower hierarchy; inserting a text of each paragraph into a discussion database, formatted according to rules of the online discussion forum; modifying the online discussion forum via a discussion forum software; creating a new version of the discussion document including the original headings; parsing the adapted online discussion forum starting with a first sub-forum; inserting titles of lower level sub-forums in the new version of the discussion document as sub-headings; and outputs the new version of the discussion document.

Abstract: A method for scoring changes of components of a concept by a group of evaluators in a collective decision process is presented. First, the level of disagreement with the components is collected together with comments indicating desired changes. The expected incremental decrease of the overall disagreement level achievable by a component change is computed for a given probability that a formulation can be found that is acceptable by both agreeing and disagreeing evaluators. Performing this computation for different values of the compromise probability yields a score indicating the expected incremental decrease in overall disagreement achievable by a component change. Next, alternative formulations for the selected components are drafted and subjected to a second round of voting. For each component the alternative yielding the maximum incremental improvement of overall consent is selected, where the sequence in which the components are scrutinized is determined by the score computed in the first step.

Abstract: A method for scoring changes of components of a concept by a group of evaluators in a collective decision process is presented. First, the level of disagreement with the components is collected together with comments indicating desired changes. The expected incremental decrease of the overall disagreement level achievable by a component change is computed for a given probability that a formulation can be found that is acceptable by both agreeing and disagreeing evaluators. Performing this computation for different values of the compromise probability yields a score indicating the expected incremental decrease in overall disagreement achievable by a component change. Additionally, the minimum compromise probability where an improvement is possible and the expected relative improvements are provided. Next, alternative formulations for the selected components are drafted and subjected to a second round of voting.

Abstract: A method for scoring changes of components of a concept by a group of evaluators in a collective decision process is presented. First, the level of disagreement with the components is collected together with comments indicating desired changes. The expected incremental decrease of the overall disagreement level achievable by a component change is computed for a given probability that a formulation can be found that is acceptable by both agreeing and disagreeing evaluators. Performing this computation for different values of the compromise probability yields a score indicating the expected incremental decrease in overall disagreement achievable by a component change. Additionally, the minimum compromise probability where an improvement is possible and the expected relative improvements are provided. Next, alternative formulations for the selected components are drafted and subjected to a second round of voting.