Patents Assigned to iParadigms, LLC
-
Patent number: 8589785Abstract: The present invention relates to systems and methods for the contextual mark-up of formatted electronic documents. These systems and methods have many applications, including use for online editing and education.Type: GrantFiled: April 19, 2010Date of Patent: November 19, 2013Assignee: Iparadigms, LLC.Inventors: John M. Barrie, Colin Sherman, Michael Kang
-
Patent number: 8423886Abstract: The present invention relates to systems and methods for the peer review, originality analysis, and contextual mark-up of formatted electronic documents. In particular, the present invention provides systems and methods that utilize layered peer review, originality analysis and contextual markup modules in one view. These systems and methods have many applications, including use for online editing and education.Type: GrantFiled: September 2, 2011Date of Patent: April 16, 2013Assignee: iParadigms, LLC.Inventors: John M. Barrie, Michael Kang, Luke Chambers, Christian Storm, Steven Golik, John Hartman
-
Publication number: 20130073575Abstract: The present invention relates to systems that search documents and highlight occurrences of text found in previously published documents, publications, Internet websites and electronic documents. In particular, the present invention relates to originality assessment of a variety of documents (e.g., student papers, college admissions essays, PhD theses, magazines, newspapers, and book publications).Type: ApplicationFiled: September 14, 2012Publication date: March 21, 2013Applicant: IPARADIGMS, LLCInventors: John Hartman, Christian Storm, Timothy Fitz, Jeffrey Lorton, Kevin Karabian, Fred Moyer
-
Patent number: 8296661Abstract: The present invention provides methods for integrating the peer review process with other applications and facilitating peer review using a user interface linked to a peer review application having knowledge base information and defined rules for: accepting a paper for peer review, assigning the paper to one or more of a defined set of reviewers for review, providing to the reviewers one or more criteria to be used for reviewing and evaluating each paper for enabling each reviewer to create a peer review result, and processing all peer review results for any paper to produce a peer review report. Access to these systems and methods may be provided, for example, on a stand-alone computer or over the Internet, World Wide Web, or an intranet.Type: GrantFiled: September 14, 2009Date of Patent: October 23, 2012Assignee: iParadigms, LLCInventors: John M. Barrie, Colin C. Sherman
-
Publication number: 20120060081Abstract: The present invention relates to systems and methods for the peer review, originality analysis, and contextual mark-up of formatted electronic documents. In particular, the present invention provides systems and methods that utilize layered peer review, originality analysis and contextual markup modules in one view. These systems and methods have many applications, including use for online editing and education.Type: ApplicationFiled: September 2, 2011Publication date: March 8, 2012Applicant: IPARADIGMS, LLCInventors: John M. Barrie, Michael Kang, Luke Chambers, Christian Storm, Steven Golik, John Hartman
-
Publication number: 20100262903Abstract: The present invention relates to systems and methods for the contextual mark-up of formatted electronic documents. These systems and methods have many applications, including use for online editing and education.Type: ApplicationFiled: April 19, 2010Publication date: October 14, 2010Applicant: IPARADIGMS, LLC.Inventors: John M. Barrie, Colin Sherman, Michael Kang
-
Patent number: 7703000Abstract: The present invention relates to systems and methods for the contextual mark-up of formatted electronic documents. These systems and methods have many applications, including use for online editing and education.Type: GrantFiled: February 5, 2004Date of Patent: April 20, 2010Assignee: Iparadigms LLCInventors: John M. Barrie, Colin Sherman, Michael Kang
-
Publication number: 20100070879Abstract: The present invention provides methods for integrating the peer review process with other applications and facilitating peer review using a user interface linked to a peer review application having knowledge base information and defined rules for: accepting a paper for peer review, assigning the paper to one or more of a defined set of reviewers for review, providing to the reviewers one or more criteria to be used for reviewing and evaluating each paper for enabling each reviewer to create a peer review result, and processing all peer review results for any paper to produce a peer review report. Access to these systems and methods may be provided, for example, on a stand-alone computer or over the Internet, World Wide Web, or an intranet.Type: ApplicationFiled: September 14, 2009Publication date: March 18, 2010Applicant: IPARADIGMS, LLCInventors: John M. Barrie, Colin C. Sherman
-
Systems and methods for conducting a peer review process and evaluating the originality of documents
Patent number: 7219301Abstract: The present invention provides methods for integrating the peer review process with other applications and facilitating peer review using a user interface linked to a peer review application having knowledge base information and defined rules for: accepting a paper for peer review, assigning the paper to one or more of a defined set of reviewers for review, providing to the reviewers one or more criteria to be used for reviewing and evaluating each paper for enabling each reviewer to create a peer review result, and processing all peer review results for any paper to produce a peer review report. Access to these systems and methods may be provided, for example, on a stand-alone computer or over the Internet, World Wide Web, or an intranet.Type: GrantFiled: March 1, 2002Date of Patent: May 15, 2007Assignee: iParadigms, LLCInventors: John M. Barrie, Colin C. Sherman -
Publication number: 20050028087Abstract: The present invention relates to systems and methods for the contextual mark-up of formatted electronic documents. These systems and methods have many applications, including use for online editing and education.Type: ApplicationFiled: February 5, 2004Publication date: February 3, 2005Applicant: iParadigms, LLCInventors: John Barrie, Colin Sherman, Michael Kang
-
Publication number: 20030164849Abstract: The present invention provides methods for integrating the peer review process with other applications and facilitating peer review using a user interface linked to a peer review application having knowledge base information and defined rules for: accepting a paper for peer review, assigning the paper to one or more of a defined set of reviewers for review, providing to the reviewers one or more criteria to be used for reviewing and evaluating each paper for enabling each reviewer to create a peer review result, and processing all peer review results for any paper to produce a peer review report. Access to these systems and methods may be provided, for example, on a stand-alone computer or over the Internet, World Wide Web, or an intranet.Type: ApplicationFiled: March 1, 2002Publication date: September 4, 2003Applicant: iParadigms, LLCInventors: John M. Barrie, Colin C. Sherman