Abstract: Multi-site distributed storage systems and computer-implemented methods are described for providing an automatic unplanned failover (AUFO) feature to guarantee non-disruptive operations (e.g., operations of business enterprise applications, operations of software application) even in the presence of failures including, but not limited to, network disconnection between multiple data centers and failures of a data center or cluster.

Abstract: Systems and methods include negotiating a primary bias state for primary and secondary storage sites for a mediator-less deployment. In one example, a computer-implemented method comprises detecting whether an active synchronous replication relationship is created for bi-directional synchronous replication between a first consistency group (CG1) of one or more storage members of the primary storage site and a second consistency group (CG2) of one or more storage members of the secondary storage site when a mediator is not configured for a mediator-less deployment or whether an existing mediator is being unconfigured with the mediator located remotely from the primary storage site and remotely from the secondary storage site, and negotiating a primary bias state and setting the primary bias state on a secondary storage cluster of the secondary storage site upon the active synchronous replication relationship being created with no configured mediator or when the existing mediator is unconfigured.

Abstract: One or more techniques and/or computing devices are provided for implementing synchronous replication. For example, a synchronous replication relationship may be established between a first storage controller hosting local storage and a second storage controller hosting remote storage (e.g., replication may be specified at a file, logical unit number (LUN), or any other level of granularity). Data operations and offloaded operations may be implemented in parallel upon the local storage and the remote storage. Error handling operations may be implemented upon the local storage and implement in parallel as a best effort on the remote storage, and a reconciliation may be performed to identify any data divergence from the best effort parallel implementation. Storage area network (SAN) operations may be implemented upon the local storage, and upon local completion may be remotely implemented upon the remote storage.

Abstract: In one embodiment, a computer-implemented method comprises establishing bi-directional synchronous replication between one or more storage objects of a primary storage site and one or more storage objects of a secondary storage site with each storage site having read/write access while maintaining zero recovery point objective (RPO) and Zero recovery time objective (RTO), initiating a resynchronization process due to a loss of the bi-directional synchronous replication between the one or more storage objects and the one or more storage objects, and performing the resynchronization process based on using inflight tracking replay and reconciliation between a first Op log metafile of the primary storage site and a second Op log metafile of the secondary storage site.

Abstract: A computer-implemented method comprises transitioning from a unidirectional asynchronous replication to initiating bi-directional synchronous replication between one or more storage objects of a first consistency group (CG1) of a primary storage site and one or more storage objects of a second consistency group (CG2) of a secondary storage site, converting the one or more storage objects of the CG2 from data protection read only access to read write access, and performing a reverse synchronization process between the one or more storage objects of the CG2 and the one or more storage objects of the CG1 including instantiating a reverse splitter on each volume of CG2, establishing reverse sync replication sessions for each storage object of the CG2, and allowing input output (IO) access to the one or more storage objects of the CG2.

Abstract: Systems and methods are described for efficiently processing events related to a relationship between a primary copy of data at a primary storage system and a mirror copy of the data at a cross-site secondary storage system of a multi-site distributed storage system. According to an example, a mediator agent that is configured on both primary and secondary storage systems provides coordination and serialization for various events generated in the relationship. The multi-site distributed storage system performs actions based on the event processing such as performing a failover operation from the primary storage system to the secondary storage system or resynchronizing the relationship to ensure application protection and availability.

Abstract: Multi-site distributed storage systems and computer-implemented methods are described for improving a resumption time of input/output (I/O) operations during a common snapshot procedure for storage objects. A computer-implemented method includes initiating a snapshot multi create operation to selectively form a batch of first and second synchronous replicated datasets that belong to a first group of storage disks at the primary storage site and corresponding second group of storage disks at the secondary storage site, performing a batch snapshot create operation on the primary storage site by executing snapshots of storage objects on the primary storage site of the batch of first and second synchronous replicated datasets in parallel multiple threads to effectively utilize processing resources on the primary storage site, and initiating an independent workflow and state machine for each storage object of the batch of first and second synchronous replicated datasets.

Abstract: A computer implemented method includes maintaining information indicative of whether a data replication relationship between a dataset associated with the local CG (CG1) and a mirror copy of the dataset stored on a remote CG (CG2) of a remote distributed storage system is in an in-synchronization (InSync) state or an out-of-synchronization (OOS) state, determining whether a CG storage expansion process is in progress, and in response to determining the OOS state and whether the primary storage site has a failure, initiating an automatic unplanned failover (AUFO) workflow without manual intervention on the original volumes in the CG1 of a first storage cluster of the primary storage site and the original volumes in the CG2 of a second storage cluster when the CG storage expansion process is in progress with a new source volume to be a member of CG1 and a new destination volume to be a member of CG2.

Abstract: A computer implemented method includes maintaining information indicative of whether a data replication relationship between a dataset associated with the local CG and a mirror copy of the dataset stored on a remote CG of a remote distributed storage system is in an in-synchronization (InSync) state or an out-of-synchronization (OOS) state, initiating a storage expansion process including a source expansion to create a new source volume as a member of the local CG and a destination expansion to create a new destination volume as a member of the remote CG, and initiating a data replication relationship expand to establish a data replication relationship for the new source volume and the new destination volume.

Abstract: One or more techniques and/or computing devices are provided for synchronous replication. For example, synchronous replication relationships are established between a first storage object (e.g., a file, a logical unit number (LUN), a consistency group, etc.), hosted by a first storage controller, and a plurality of replication storage objects hosted by other storage controllers. In this way, a write operation to the first storage object is implemented in parallel upon the first storage object and the replication storage objects in a synchronous manner, such as using a zero-copy operation to reduce overhead otherwise introduced by performing copy operations. Reconciliation is performed in response to a failure so that the first storage object and the replication storage objects comprise consistent data. Failed write operations and replication write operations are retried, while enforcing a single write semantic.

Abstract: Multi-site distributed storage systems and computer-implemented methods are described for providing common snapshot retention and automatic fanout reconfiguration for an asynchronous leg after a failure event that causes a failover from a primary storage site to a secondary storage site. A computer-implemented method comprises providing an asynchronous replication relationship with an asynchronous update schedule from one or more storage objects of the first storage node to one or more replicated storage objects of the third storage node, creating a snapshot copy of the one or more storage objects of the first storage node, transferring the snapshot copy to the third storage node based on an asynchronous mirror policy, and intercepting the snapshot create operation on the primary storage site and transferring the snapshot copy to the second storage node to provide a common snapshot between the second storage node and the third storage node.

Abstract: A computer-implemented method comprises providing a synchronous replication relationship from one or more storage objects of a first storage node to one or more replicated storage objects of a second storage node, providing an asynchronous replication relationship with an asynchronous update schedule from the one or more storage objects of the first storage node to one or more replicated storage objects of the third storage node to provide a protection configuration, tracking, with the third storage node of the tertiary site, a state of the secondary storage site, automatically performing a failover from the primary storage site to the secondary storage site and activating a synchronous mirror copy for the one or more replicated storage objects of the second storage node, and automatically initiating realignment and reconfiguration of the protection configuration to the tertiary storage site based upon the state of the secondary storage site.

Abstract: Multi-site distributed storage systems and computer-implemented methods are described for improving a resumption time of input/output (I/O) operations during an automatic unplanned failover (AUFO). A computer-implemented method includes monitoring, with a second cluster, heartbeat information received at ultra-short time intervals from a first connection of one or more storage objects of the first cluster, determining, with the second cluster, whether the heartbeat information from the first connection is received during an ultra-short time interval, and intelligently routing heartbeat information from the one or more storage objects of the first cluster from the first connection to a second connection when the heartbeat information from the first connection is not received during the ultra-short time interval.

Abstract: One or more techniques and/or computing devices are provided for managing an arbitrary set of storage items using a granset. For example, a storage controller may host a plurality of storage items and/or logical unit numbers (LUNs). A subset of the storage items are grouped into a consistency group. A granset is created for tracking, managing, and/or providing access to the storage items within the consistency group. For example, the granset comprises application programming interfaces (APIs) and/or properties used to provide certain levels of access to the storage items (e.g., read access, write access, no access), redirect operations to access either data of an active file system or to a snapshot, fence certain operations (e.g., rename and delete operations), and/or other properties that apply to each storage item within the consistency group. Thus, the granset provides a persistent on-disk layout used to manage an arbitrary set of storage items.

Abstract: One or more techniques and/or computing devices are provided for resynchronization. For example, a request may be received to create pseudo snapshots of a first consistency group, hosted by a first storage controller, and a second consistency group, hosted by a second storage controller, having a synchronous replication relationship with the first consistency group. Incoming client write requests are logged within an intercept tracking log at the first storage controller. After a first drain without hold of incoming write requests is performed, a first pseudo common snapshot of the second consistency group is created. After a second drain without hold of incoming write operations is performed, a second pseudo common snapshot of the first consistency group and the intercept tracking log is created. The pseudo snapshots and the intercept tracking log (e.g., indicating a delta between the pseudo snapshots) are used to resynchronize the first and second consistency groups.

Abstract: Multi-site distributed storage systems and computer-implemented methods are described for improving a resumption time of input/output (I/O) operations during an automatic unplanned failover (AUFO). A computer-implemented method includes determining, with a second storage cluster, whether heartbeat information from one or more storage objects of a CG of a first set of CGs is received during a time period, determining an out of sync state for a data replication relationship between the CG of the first set of CGs and a mirrored CG of a second set of CGs when the heartbeat information is not received during the time period and sending a single bulk role change call with a cluster identifier from the second cluster to an external mediator to provide a role change from follower to leader in the second set of CGs.

Abstract: Multi-site distributed storage systems and computer-implemented methods are described for improving a resumption time of input/output (I/O) operations during a common snapshot procedure for storage objects. A computer-implemented method includes initiating a snapshot multi create operation to selectively form a batch of first and second synchronous replicated datasets that belong to a first group of storage disks at the primary storage site and corresponding second group of storage disks at the secondary storage site, performing a batch snapshot create operation on the primary storage site by executing snapshots of storage objects on the primary storage site of the batch of first and second synchronous replicated datasets in parallel multiple threads to effectively utilize processing resources on the primary storage site, and initiating an independent workflow and state machine for each storage object of the batch of first and second synchronous replicated datasets.

Abstract: One or more techniques and/or computing devices are provided for implementing synchronous replication. For example, a synchronous replication relationship may be established between a first storage controller hosting local storage and a second storage controller hosting remote storage (e.g., replication may be specified at a file, logical unit number (LUN), or any other level of granularity). Data operations and offloaded operations may be implemented in parallel upon the local storage and the remote storage. Error handling operations may be implemented upon the local storage and implement in parallel as a best effort on the remote storage, and a reconciliation may be performed to identify any data divergence from the best effort parallel implementation. Storage area network (SAN) operations may be implemented upon the local storage, and upon local completion may be remotely implemented upon the remote storage.

Abstract: Multi-site distributed storage systems and computer-implemented methods are described for providing common snapshot retention and automatic fanout reconfiguration for an asynchronous leg after a failure event that causes a failover from a primary storage site to a secondary storage site. A computer-implemented method comprises providing an asynchronous replication relationship with an asynchronous update schedule from one or more storage objects of the first storage node to one or more replicated storage objects of the third storage node, creating a snapshot copy of the one or more storage objects of the first storage node, transferring the snapshot copy to the third storage node based on an asynchronous mirror policy, and intercepting the snapshot create operation on the primary storage site and transferring the snapshot copy to the second storage node to provide a common snapshot between the second storage node and the third storage node.

Abstract: A computer-implemented method comprises providing a synchronous replication relationship from one or more storage objects of a first storage node to one or more replicated storage objects of a second storage node, providing an asynchronous replication relationship with an asynchronous update schedule from the one or more storage objects of the first storage node to one or more replicated storage objects of the third storage node to provide a protection configuration, tracking, with the third storage node of the tertiary site, a state of the secondary storage site, automatically performing a failover from the primary storage site to the secondary storage site and activating a synchronous mirror copy for the one or more replicated storage objects of the second storage node, and automatically initiating realignment and reconfiguration of the protection configuration to the tertiary storage site based upon the state of the secondary storage site.