Abstract: Systems and methods for automated custom training of a scoring model are disclosed herein. The method include: receiving a plurality of responses received from a plurality of students in response to providing of a prompt; identifying an evaluation model relevant to the provided prompt, which evaluation model can be a machine learning model trained to output a score relevant to at least portions of a response; generating a training indicator that provides a graphical depiction of the degree to which the identified evaluation model is trained; determining a training status of the model; receiving at least one evaluation input when the model is identified as insufficiently trained; updating training of the evaluation model based on the at least one received evaluation input; and controlling the training indicator to reflect the degree to which the evaluation model is trained subsequent to the updating of the training of the evaluation model.

Abstract: Systems and methods for automated custom training of a scoring model are disclosed herein. The method include: receiving a plurality of responses received from a plurality of students in response to providing of a prompt; identifying an evaluation model relevant to the provided prompt, which evaluation model can be a machine learning model trained to output a score relevant to at least portions of a response; generating a training indicator that provides a graphical depiction of the degree to which the identified evaluation model is trained; determining a training status of the model; receiving at least one evaluation input when the model is identified as insufficiently trained; updating training of the evaluation model based on the at least one received evaluation input; and controlling the training indicator to reflect the degree to which the evaluation model is trained subsequent to the updating of the training of the evaluation model.

Abstract: Systems and methods for automated custom training of a scoring model are disclosed herein. The method include: receiving a plurality of responses received from a plurality of students in response to providing of a prompt; identifying an evaluation model relevant to the provided prompt, which evaluation model can be a machine learning model trained to output a score relevant to at least portions of a response; generating a training indicator that provides a graphical depiction of the degree to which the identified evaluation model is trained; determining a training status of the model; receiving at least one evaluation input when the model is identified as insufficiently trained; updating training of the evaluation model based on the at least one received evaluation input; and controlling the training indicator to reflect the degree to which the evaluation model is trained subsequent to the updating of the training of the evaluation model.

Abstract: Systems and methods for automated custom training of a scoring model are disclosed herein. The method include: receiving a plurality of responses received from a plurality of students in response to providing of a prompt; identifying an evaluation model relevant to the provided prompt, which evaluation model can be a machine learning model trained to output a score relevant to at least portions of a response; generating a training indicator that provides a graphical depiction of the degree to which the identified evaluation model is trained; determining a training status of the model; receiving at least one evaluation input when the model is identified as insufficiently trained; updating training of the evaluation model based on the at least one received evaluation input; and controlling the training indicator to reflect the degree to which the evaluation model is trained subsequent to the updating of the training of the evaluation model.

Abstract: Systems and methods for automated custom training of a scoring model are disclosed herein. The method include: receiving a plurality of responses received from a plurality of students in response to providing of a prompt; identifying an evaluation model relevant to the provided prompt, which evaluation model can be a machine learning model trained to output a score relevant to at least portions of a response; generating a training indicator that provides a graphical depiction of the degree to which the identified evaluation model is trained; determining a training status of the model; receiving at least one evaluation input when the model is identified as insufficiently trained; updating training of the evaluation model based on the at least one received evaluation input; and controlling the training indicator to reflect the degree to which the evaluation model is trained subsequent to the updating of the training of the evaluation model.

Abstract: Systems and methods for automated custom training of a scoring model are disclosed herein. The method include: receiving a plurality of responses received from a plurality of students in response to providing of a prompt; identifying an evaluation model relevant to the provided prompt, which evaluation model can be a machine learning model trained to output a score relevant to at least portions of a response; generating a training indicator that provides a graphical depiction of the degree to which the identified evaluation model is trained; determining a training status of the model; receiving at least one evaluation input when the model is identified as insufficiently trained; updating training of the evaluation model based on the at least one received evaluation input; and controlling the training indicator to reflect the degree to which the evaluation model is trained subsequent to the updating of the training of the evaluation model.

Abstract: Systems and methods for automated sequencing database generation are disclosed herein. The system can include memory that can include a content library database; a graph database; and a model database. The system can include a user device and at least one server. The at least one server can: receive a content aggregation from the content library database; identify content components of the content aggregation based on a natural language processing analysis of at least a portion of the content aggregation; identify explicit sequencing of the content components; generate an intermediate content graph based on the explicit sequencing of the content components; generate a final content graph from the intermediate content graph based on implicit sequencing of the content components; and store the final content graph within the graph database.

Abstract: Systems and methods for automated sequencing database generation are disclosed herein. The system can include memory that can include a content library database; a graph database; and a model database. The system can include a user device and at least one server. The at least one server can: receive a content aggregation from the content library database; identify content components of the content aggregation based on a natural language processing analysis of at least a portion of the content aggregation; identify explicit sequencing of the content components; generate an intermediate content graph based on the explicit sequencing of the content components; generate a final content graph from the intermediate content graph based on implicit sequencing of the content components; and store the final content graph within the graph database.

Abstract: Systems and methods for automated sequencing database generation are disclosed herein. The system can include memory that can include a content library database; a graph database; and a model database. The system can include a user device and at least one server. The at least one server can: receive a content aggregation from the content library database; identify content components of the content aggregation based on a natural language processing analysis of at least a portion of the content aggregation; identify explicit sequencing of the content components; generate an intermediate content graph based on the explicit sequencing of the content components; generate a final content graph from the intermediate content graph based on implicit sequencing of the content components; and store the final content graph within the graph database.

Abstract: Systems and methods for automated sequencing database generation are disclosed herein. The system can include memory that can include a content library database; a graph database; and a model database. The system can include a user device and at least one server. The at least one server can: receive a content aggregation from the content library database; identify content components of the content aggregation based on a natural language processing analysis of at least a portion of the content aggregation; identify explicit sequencing of the content components; generate an intermediate content graph based on the explicit sequencing of the content components; generate a final content graph from the intermediate content graph based on implicit sequencing of the content components; and store the final content graph within the graph database.

Abstract: Systems and methods for automated sequencing database generation are disclosed herein. The system can include memory that can include a content library database; a graph database; and a model database. The system can include a user device and at least one server. The at least one server can: receive a content aggregation from the content library database; identify content components of the content aggregation based on a natural language processing analysis of at least a portion of the content aggregation; identify explicit sequencing of the content components; generate an intermediate content graph based on the explicit sequencing of the content components; generate a final content graph from the intermediate content graph based on implicit sequencing of the content components; and store the final content graph within the graph database.

Abstract: Systems and methods for automated custom training of a scoring model are disclosed herein. The method include: receiving a plurality of responses received from a plurality of students in response to providing of a prompt; identifying an evaluation model relevant to the provided prompt, which evaluation model can be a machine learning model trained to output a score relevant to at least portions of a response; generating a training indicator that provides a graphical depiction of the degree to which the identified evaluation model is trained; determining a training status of the model; receiving at least one evaluation input when the model is identified as insufficiently trained; updating training of the evaluation model based on the at least one received evaluation input; and controlling the training indicator to reflect the degree to which the evaluation model is trained subsequent to the updating of the training of the evaluation model.

Abstract: Systems and methods for automated custom training of a scoring model are disclosed herein. The method include: receiving a plurality of responses received from a plurality of students in response to providing of a prompt; identifying an evaluation model relevant to the provided prompt, which evaluation model can be a machine learning model trained to output a score relevant to at least portions of a response; generating a training indicator that provides a graphical depiction of the degree to which the identified evaluation model is trained; determining a training status of the model; receiving at least one evaluation input when the model is identified as insufficiently trained; updating training of the evaluation model based on the at least one received evaluation input; and controlling the training indicator to reflect the degree to which the evaluation model is trained subsequent to the updating of the training of the evaluation model.

Abstract: Systems and methods for automated custom training of a scoring model are disclosed herein. The method include: receiving a plurality of responses received from a plurality of students in response to providing of a prompt; identifying an evaluation model relevant to the provided prompt, which evaluation model can be a machine learning model trained to output a score relevant to at least portions of a response; generating a training indicator that provides a graphical depiction of the degree to which the identified evaluation model is trained; determining a training status of the model; receiving at least one evaluation input when the model is identified as insufficiently trained; updating training of the evaluation model based on the at least one received evaluation input; and controlling the training indicator to reflect the degree to which the evaluation model is trained subsequent to the updating of the training of the evaluation model.

Abstract: Systems and methods for automated custom training of a scoring model are disclosed herein. The method include: receiving a plurality of responses received from a plurality of students in response to providing of a prompt; identifying an evaluation model relevant to the provided prompt, which evaluation model can be a machine learning model trained to output a score relevant to at least portions of a response; generating a training indicator that provides a graphical depiction of the degree to which the identified evaluation model is trained; determining a training status of the model; receiving at least one evaluation input when the model is identified as insufficiently trained; updating training of the evaluation model based on the at least one received evaluation input; and controlling the training indicator to reflect the degree to which the evaluation model is trained subsequent to the updating of the training of the evaluation model.

Abstract: Systems and methods for automated custom training of a scoring model are disclosed herein. The method include: receiving a plurality of responses received from a plurality of students in response to providing of a prompt; identifying an evaluation model relevant to the provided prompt, which evaluation model can be a machine learning model trained to output a score relevant to at least portions of a response; generating a training indicator that provides a graphical depiction of the degree to which the identified evaluation model is trained; determining a training status of the model; receiving at least one evaluation input when the model is identified as insufficiently trained; updating training of the evaluation model based on the at least one received evaluation input; and controlling the training indicator to reflect the degree to which the evaluation model is trained subsequent to the updating of the training of the evaluation model.

Abstract: Systems and methods for automated custom training of a scoring model are disclosed herein. The method include: receiving a plurality of responses received from a plurality of students in response to providing of a prompt; identifying an evaluation model relevant to the provided prompt, which evaluation model can be a machine learning model trained to output a score relevant to at least portions of a response; generating a training indicator that provides a graphical depiction of the degree to which the identified evaluation model is trained; determining a training status of the model; receiving at least one evaluation input when the model is identified as insufficiently trained; updating training of the evaluation model based on the at least one received evaluation input; and controlling the training indicator to reflect the degree to which the evaluation model is trained subsequent to the updating of the training of the evaluation model.

Abstract: Systems and methods for automated sequencing database generation are disclosed herein. The system can include memory that can include a content library database; a graph database; and a model database. The system can include a user device and at least one server. The at least one server can: receive a content aggregation from the content library database; identify content components of the content aggregation based on a natural language processing analysis of at least a portion of the content aggregation; identify explicit sequencing of the content components; generate an intermediate content graph based on the explicit sequencing of the content components; generate a final content graph from the intermediate content graph based on implicit sequencing of the content components; and store the final content graph within the graph database.

Abstract: Systems and methods for automated sequencing database generation are disclosed herein. The system can include memory that can include a content library database; a graph database; and a model database. The system can include a user device and at least one server. The at least one server can: receive a content aggregation from the content library database; identify content components of the content aggregation based on a natural language processing analysis of at least a portion of the content aggregation; identify explicit sequencing of the content components; generate an intermediate content graph based on the explicit sequencing of the content components; generate a final content graph from the intermediate content graph based on implicit sequencing of the content components; and store the final content graph within the graph database.

Abstract: Systems and methods for automated sequencing database generation are disclosed herein. The system can include memory that can include a content library database; a graph database; and a model database. The system can include a user device and at least one server. The at least one server can: receive a content aggregation from the content library database; identify content components of the content aggregation based on a natural language processing analysis of at least a portion of the content aggregation; identify explicit sequencing of the content components; generate an intermediate content graph based on the explicit sequencing of the content components; generate a final content graph from the intermediate content graph based on implicit sequencing of the content components; and store the final content graph within the graph database.