Abstract: Method and system to automatically verify the layout of a webpage on various screen sizes. The method includes retrieving screen size data associated with the webpage. The method further includes determining anchor points for the webpage based on the retrieved screen size data. The method also includes rendering the plurality of elements of the webpage based on the retrieved screen size data and the determined anchor points and identifying a respective location of each of the plurality of elements of the webpage to verify the layout of the plurality of elements of the webpage. If an error in the layout of the webpage is detected, a visual and/or audio alert is sent.

Abstract: Embodiments provide for automated testing of an Application Under Test (AUT) that utilizes an infinite scroll element. Automated testing of the AUT can comprise executing one or more test scripts on the AUT which can present a user interface including a plurality of elements and the test scripts can perform one or more functional tests on the AUT through the plurality of elements of the user interface. During performance of the one or more functional tests, a scroll event associated with an element of the user interface can be detected and a determination can be made as to whether the element associated with the scroll event is an infinite scroll element. In response to determining the element is an infinite scroll element, a set of test results for the functional test can be recorded including results for the infinite scroll element and an interaction with the infinite scroll element.

Abstract: Method and system to automatically verify the layout of a webpage on various screen sizes. The method includes retrieving screen size data associated with the webpage. The method further includes determining anchor points for the webpage based on the retrieved screen size data. The method also includes rendering the plurality of elements of the webpage based on the retrieved screen size data and the determined anchor points and identifying a respective location of each of the plurality of elements of the webpage to verify the layout of the plurality of elements of the webpage. If an error in the layout of the webpage is detected, a visual and/or audio alert is sent.

Abstract: An image of a graphical user interface is captured. For example, a screen shot of a browser display is captured. Text syntax is executed that contains one or more parameters for identifying a graphical object. For example, the text syntax may identify a rectangle that contains the text “OK” where the text is red. Based on the text syntax, a graphical object is identified in the image of the graphical user interface. Information is returned that identifies how to access the graphical object in the graphical user interface. For example, coordinates of the graphical object are identified. This information can then be used in a test script using existing programming languages to test the graphical user interface. For example, the coordinates may be used to click on the OK button.

Abstract: Embodiments of the disclosure provide systems and methods for executing a functional test on an application. According to one embodiment, a method for running a functional test on an application can comprise executing the function test on the application. The functional test can comprise a plurality of steps. The plurality of steps can comprise a set of related steps having one or more relationships between each other and a set of one or more independent steps having no relationships to other steps in the plurality of steps. The one or more relationships between the set of related steps can be deduced and an indication of the deduced one or more relationships between the set of related steps can be saved. The functional test can then be replayed on the application based on the saved indication of the deduced one or more relationships between the set of related steps.

Abstract: Embodiments provide for automated testing of an Application Under Test (AUT) that utilizes an infinite scroll element. Automated testing of the AUT can comprise executing one or more test scripts on the AUT which can present a user interface including a plurality of elements and the test scripts can perform one or more functional tests on the AUT through the plurality of elements of the user interface. During performance of the one or more functional tests, a scroll event associated with an element of the user interface can be detected and a determination can be made as to whether the element associated with the scroll event is an infinite scroll element. In response to determining the element is an infinite scroll element, a set of test results for the functional test can be recorded including results for the infinite scroll element and an interaction with the infinite scroll element.

Abstract: Embodiments of the disclosure provide systems and methods for executing a functional test on an application. According to one embodiment, a method for running a functional test on an application can comprise executing the function test on the application. The functional test can comprise a plurality of steps. The plurality of steps can comprise a set of related steps having one or more relationships between each other and a set of one or more independent steps having no relationships to other steps in the plurality of steps. The one or more relationships between the set of related steps can be deduced and an indication of the deduced one or more relationships between the set of related steps can be saved. The functional test can then be replayed on the application based on the saved indication of the deduced one or more relationships between the set of related steps.

Abstract: An apparatus may include a processor (102) that may generate automated test scripts to test graphical user interface (GUI) functions of an application under test (AUT) (235). The apparatus may generate a screen element (220) that is overlaid onto at least one or all of the GUIs (210). The screen element (220) may therefore receive user inputs directed at the GUI (210), but block such inputs from being provided to the GUI (210). The user inputs received at the screen element (220) may be recorded in an automated test script for later replay. Blocking the user input may prevent a change in appearance of a GUI element (212) that would otherwise result from the user input, facilitating automated location of the GUI element (212) during replay of the automated test script.

Abstract: According to examples, an apparatus may include a processor that may identify sensitive information in a recording of an automated test script that is replayed to automatically test a graphical user interface (GUI) of an application under test (AUT). The apparatus may identify the sensitive information during the recording such that sensitive information is identified as the automated test is recorded or afterward based on an analysis of the recording. as based on user input that identifies the sensitive information (or areas containing the sensitive information), automated text analysis, or automated image analysis such as machine-learning based object detection. Once sensitive information (or area) is identified, the apparatus may generate and apply a mosaic to obscure the sensitive information (or area).

Abstract: An image of a graphical user interface is captured. For example, a screen shot of a browser display is captured. Text syntax is executed that contains one or more parameters for identifying a graphical object. For example, the text syntax may identify a rectangle that contains the text “OK” where the text is red. Based on the text syntax, a graphical object is identified in the image of the graphical user interface. Information is returned that identifies how to access the graphical object in the graphical user interface. For example, coordinates of the graphical object are identified. This information can then be used in a test script using existing programming languages to test the graphical user interface. For example, the coordinates may be used to click on the OK button.

Abstract: According to examples, an apparatus may include a processor that may identify and execute workflows based on simulated network addresses such as simulated uniform resource locations (“URLs”). The system may generate recorded automation scripts that automatically completes some or all of the tasks of a workflow. The system may store the automation scripts in association with the workflow and a simulated URL. The simulated URL may include a string that does not literally resolve to a document on a networked resource. Rather, the simulated URL may instead identify and indicate that a corresponding workflow is to be executed. A browser extension of a browser may intercept URLs that are provided to a browser, determine that a simulated URL has been entered, and provide the simulated URL to a replay engine that identifies and executes the automated script associated with the simulated URL.