Patents by Inventor James Hazard

James Hazard has filed for patents to protect the following inventions. This listing includes patent applications that are pending as well as patents that have already been granted by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO).

  • Patent number: 12260348
    Abstract: Techniques for improved searching and querying in computer-based reasoning systems are discussed and include receiving multiple new multidimensional data element to store in a computer-based reasoning data model; determining a feature bucket for each feature of each data element and storing a reference identifier in the feature bucket(s). A query on the computer-based reasoning system includes input data element (e.g., an actual data element, or a set of restrictions on features). For each feature in the input data element, feature buckets are determined, candidate results are determined based on whether cases have related feature buckets, and the results are determined based at least in part on the candidate results. In some embodiments, control of controllable systems may be caused based on the results.
    Type: Grant
    Filed: August 3, 2023
    Date of Patent: March 25, 2025
    Assignee: Howso Incorporated
    Inventors: Michael Auerbach, Michael Resnick, Christopher James Hazard
  • Publication number: 20250045606
    Abstract: The techniques herein include using an input context to determine a suggested action and/or cluster. Explanations may also be determined and returned along with the suggested action. The explanations may include (i) one or more most similar cases to the suggested case (e.g., the case associated with the suggested action) and, optionally, a conviction score for each nearby cases; (ii) action probabilities, (iii) excluding cases and distances, (iv) archetype and/or counterfactual cases for the suggested action; (v) feature residuals; (vi) regional model complexity; (vii) fractional dimensionality; (viii) prediction conviction; (ix) feature prediction contribution; and/or other measures such as the ones discussed herein, including certainty. The explanation data may be used to determine whether to perform a suggested action.
    Type: Application
    Filed: October 25, 2024
    Publication date: February 6, 2025
    Inventors: Christopher James Hazard, Michael Resnick, Christopher Fusting
  • Patent number: 12198069
    Abstract: Techniques are provided herein. The techniques can include obtaining current context data and determining a contextually-determined action based on the obtained context data and a reasoning model. The reasoning model may have been determined based on one or more sets of training data. The techniques may cause performance of the contextually-determined action and, potentially, receiving an indication that performing the contextually-determined action in the current context resulted in an anomaly. The techniques include determining a portion of the reasoning model that caused the determination of the contextually-determined action based on the obtained context data and causing removal of the portion of the model that caused the determination of the contextually-determined action, to produce a corrected reasoning model. Subsequently, second context data is obtained, a second action is determined based on that data and the corrected reasoning model, and the second contextually-determined action can be performed.
    Type: Grant
    Filed: October 24, 2023
    Date of Patent: January 14, 2025
    Assignee: Howso Incorporated
    Inventor: Christopher James Hazard
  • Patent number: 12175386
    Abstract: Techniques for synthetic data generation in computer-based reasoning systems are discussed and include receiving a request for generation of synthetic data based on a set of training data cases. One or more focal training data cases are determined. For undetermined features (either all of them or those that are not subject to conditions), a value for the feature is determined based on the focal cases. In some embodiments, the generated synthetic data may be checked for similarity against the training data, and if similarity conditions are met, it may be modified (e.g., resampled), removed, and/or replaced.
    Type: Grant
    Filed: June 21, 2023
    Date of Patent: December 24, 2024
    Assignee: Howso Incorporated
    Inventors: Christopher James Hazard, Jacob Beel, Yash Shah, Ravisutha Sakrepatna Srinivasamurthy, Michael Resnick
  • Patent number: 12154041
    Abstract: Techniques for synthetic data generation in computer-based reasoning systems are discussed and include receiving a request for generation of synthetic data based on a set of training data cases. One or more focal training data cases are determined. For undetermined features (either all of them or those that are not subject to conditions), a value for the feature is determined based on the focal cases. In some embodiments, the generated synthetic data may be checked for similarity against the training data, and if similarity conditions are met, it may be modified (e.g., resampled), removed, and/or replaced.
    Type: Grant
    Filed: April 10, 2023
    Date of Patent: November 26, 2024
    Assignee: Howso Incorporated
    Inventors: Christopher James Hazard, Michael Resnick, Christopher Fusting
  • Publication number: 20240386323
    Abstract: Techniques for synthetic data generation in computer-based reasoning systems are discussed and include receiving a request for generation of synthetic data based on a set of training data cases. One or more focal training data cases are determined. For undetermined features (either all of them or those that are not subject to conditions), a value for the feature is determined based on the focal cases. In some embodiments, the generation of synthetic data may be conditioned on values of features, preserved features, such as unique identifiers, previous-in-time features, and using the other techniques discussed herein.
    Type: Application
    Filed: April 30, 2024
    Publication date: November 21, 2024
    Inventors: Christopher James Hazard, Michael Resnick, Ravisutha Sakrepatna Srinivasamurthy, David R. Cheeseman, Valeri A. Korobov, Martin James Koistinen, Matthew Chase Fulp
  • Patent number: 12141714
    Abstract: The techniques herein include using an input context to determine a suggested action and/or cluster. Explanations may also be determined and returned along with the suggested action. The explanations may include (i) one or more most similar cases to the suggested case (e.g., the case associated with the suggested action) and, optionally, a conviction score for each nearby cases; (ii) action probabilities, (iii) excluding cases and distances, (iv) archetype and/or counterfactual cases for the suggested action; (v) feature residuals; (vi) regional model complexity; (vii) fractional dimensionality; (viii) prediction conviction; (ix) feature prediction contribution; and/or other measures such as the ones discussed herein, including certainty. The explanation data may be used to determine whether to perform a suggested action.
    Type: Grant
    Filed: October 9, 2023
    Date of Patent: November 12, 2024
    Assignee: Howso Incorporated
    Inventors: Christopher James Hazard, Michael Resnick, Christopher Fusting
  • Publication number: 20240361734
    Abstract: Techniques are provided herein for creating well-balanced computer-based reasoning systems and using those to control systems. The techniques include receiving a request to determine whether to include one or more particular data elements in a computer-based reasoning model and determining two probability density or mass functions (“PDMFs”), one for the data set including the one or more particular data elements, once for the data set excluding it. Surprisal is determined based on those two PDMFs, and inclusion in the computer-based reasoning model is determined based on surprisal. A system is later controlled using the computer-based reasoning model.
    Type: Application
    Filed: April 30, 2024
    Publication date: October 31, 2024
    Inventor: Christopher James Hazard
  • Patent number: 12067467
    Abstract: The techniques herein include using an input context to determine a suggested action. One or more explanations may also be determined and returned along with the suggested action. The one or more explanations may include (i) one or more most similar cases to the suggested case (e.g., the case associated with the suggested action) and, optionally, a conviction score for each nearby cases; (ii) action probabilities, (iii) excluding cases and distances, (iv) archetype and/or counterfactual cases for the suggested action; (v) feature residuals; (vi) regional model complexity; (vii) fractional dimensionality; (viii) prediction conviction; (ix) feature prediction contribution; (x) conviction ratio; (xi) contribution ratio; and/or other measures such as the ones discussed herein, including certainty. In some embodiments, the explanation data may be used to determine whether to perform a suggested action.
    Type: Grant
    Filed: July 5, 2023
    Date of Patent: August 20, 2024
    Assignee: Howso Incorporated
    Inventors: Christopher James Hazard, Michael Resnick, Christopher Fusting
  • Publication number: 20240265484
    Abstract: Techniques for digital watermarking of data are provided herein. The techniques include receiving a request for digitally watermarking a set of data, determining uncertainty related to the set of data, determining an watermarking layout for the set of data, generating a watermarked set of data based at least in part on encoding the digital watermark using the watermarking layout, optionally testing the watermark for fitness, and causing control of a controllable system using a computer-based reasoning model that was determined at least in part based on data cases in the watermarked set of data.
    Type: Application
    Filed: January 23, 2024
    Publication date: August 8, 2024
    Inventor: Christopher James Hazard
  • Publication number: 20240232660
    Abstract: Techniques are provided herein. The techniques can include obtaining current context data and determining a contextually-determined action based on the obtained context data and a reasoning model. The reasoning model may have been determined based on one or more sets of training data. The techniques may cause performance of the contextually-determined action and, potentially, receiving an indication that performing the contextually-determined action in the current context resulted in an anomaly. The techniques include determining a portion of the reasoning model that caused the determination of the contextually-determined action based on the obtained context data and causing removal of the portion of the model that caused the determination of the contextually-determined action, to produce a corrected reasoning model. Subsequently, second context data is obtained, a second action is determined based on that data and the corrected reasoning model, and the second contextually-determined action can be performed.
    Type: Application
    Filed: October 24, 2023
    Publication date: July 11, 2024
    Inventor: Christopher James Hazard
  • Patent number: 12008446
    Abstract: Techniques for synthetic data generation in computer-based reasoning systems are discussed and include receiving a request for generation of synthetic data based on a set of training data cases. One or more focal training data cases are determined. For undetermined features (either all of them or those that are not subject to conditions), a value for the feature is determined based on the focal cases. In some embodiments, the generation of synthetic data may be conditioned on values of features, preserved features, such as unique identifiers, previous-in-time features, and using the other techniques discussed herein.
    Type: Grant
    Filed: October 24, 2022
    Date of Patent: June 11, 2024
    Assignee: Howso Incorporated
    Inventors: Christopher James Hazard, Michael Resnick, Ravisutha Sakrepatna Srinivasamurthy, David R. Cheeseman, Valeri A. Korobov, Martin James Koistinen, Matthew Chase Fulp
  • Patent number: 12001177
    Abstract: Techniques are provided herein for creating well-balanced computer-based reasoning systems and using those to control systems. The techniques include receiving a request to determine whether to include one or more particular data elements in a computer-based reasoning model and determining two probability density or mass functions (“PDMFs”), one for the data set including the one or more particular data elements, once for the data set excluding it. Surprisal is determined based on those two PDMFs, and inclusion in the computer-based reasoning model is determined based on surprisal. A system is later controlled using the computer-based reasoning model.
    Type: Grant
    Filed: August 25, 2022
    Date of Patent: June 4, 2024
    Assignee: Howso Incorporated
    Inventor: Christopher James Hazard
  • Publication number: 20240135206
    Abstract: Techniques are provided herein. The techniques can include obtaining current context data and determining a contextually-determined action based on the obtained context data and a reasoning model. The reasoning model may have been determined based on one or more sets of training data. The techniques may cause performance of the contextually-determined action and, potentially, receiving an indication that performing the contextually-determined action in the current context resulted in an anomaly. The techniques include determining a portion of the reasoning model that caused the determination of the contextually-determined action based on the obtained context data and causing removal of the portion of the model that caused the determination of the contextually-determined action, to produce a corrected reasoning model. Subsequently, second context data is obtained, a second action is determined based on that data and the corrected reasoning model, and the second contextually-determined action can be performed.
    Type: Application
    Filed: October 23, 2023
    Publication date: April 25, 2024
    Inventor: Christopher James Hazard
  • Publication number: 20240119317
    Abstract: The techniques herein include using an input context to determine a suggested action and/or cluster. Explanations may also be determined and returned along with the suggested action. The explanations may include (i) one or more most similar cases to the suggested case (e.g., the case associated with the suggested action) and, optionally, a conviction score for each nearby cases; (ii) action probabilities, (iii) excluding cases and distances, (iv) archetype and/or counterfactual cases for the suggested action; (v) feature residuals; (vi) regional model complexity; (vii) fractional dimensionality; (viii) prediction conviction; (ix) feature prediction contribution; and/or other measures such as the ones discussed herein, including certainty. The explanation data may be used to determine whether to perform a suggested action.
    Type: Application
    Filed: October 9, 2023
    Publication date: April 11, 2024
    Inventors: Christopher James Hazard, Michael Resnick, Christopher Fusting
  • Publication number: 20240112047
    Abstract: Techniques for improved automated selection in computer-based reasoning systems are presented. The techniques include receiving context data for operation of a system, determining two or more candidate actions to take, each from a different computer-based reasoning model, and determining the surprisal of each. The surprisals are then compared and, in some embodiments, the one with the lowest surprisal is chosen. In some embodiments, this chosen action is performed on the system. In some embodiments, the chosen action is passed up a control hierarchy for consideration along with entropy and other factors, and the action chosen at that level is performed on the controlled system.
    Type: Application
    Filed: December 11, 2023
    Publication date: April 4, 2024
    Inventor: Christopher James Hazard
  • Patent number: 11941542
    Abstract: Techniques are provided for operational situation vehicle control, and include determining action and context data for one or more vehicle operations in one or more operational situations, training vehicle control rules for those operational situations, and using those vehicle control rules to control vehicles in compatible operational situations.
    Type: Grant
    Filed: June 14, 2021
    Date of Patent: March 26, 2024
    Assignee: DIVEPLANE CORPORATION
    Inventors: Christopher James Hazard, Michael Vincent Capps
  • Publication number: 20240046125
    Abstract: Techniques for improved searching and querying in computer-based reasoning systems are discussed and include receiving multiple new multidimensional data element to store in a computer-based reasoning data model; determining a feature bucket for each feature of each data element and storing a reference identifier in the feature bucket(s). A query on the computer-based reasoning system includes input data element (e.g., an actual data element, or a set of restrictions on features). For each feature in the input data element, feature buckets are determined, candidate results are determined based on whether cases have related feature buckets, and the results are determined based at least in part on the candidate results. In some embodiments, control of controllable systems may be caused based on the results.
    Type: Application
    Filed: August 3, 2023
    Publication date: February 8, 2024
    Inventors: Michael Auerbach, Michael Resnick, Christopher James Hazard
  • Patent number: 11880775
    Abstract: Techniques for improved automated selection in computer-based reasoning systems are presented. The techniques include receiving context data for operation of a system, determining two or more candidate actions to take, each from a different computer-based reasoning model, and determining the surprisal of each. The surprisals are then compared and, in some embodiments, the one with the lowest surprisal is chosen. In some embodiments, this chosen action is performed on the system. In some embodiments, the chosen action is passed up a control hierarchy for consideration along with entropy and other factors, and the action chosen at that level is performed on the controlled system.
    Type: Grant
    Filed: June 5, 2018
    Date of Patent: January 23, 2024
    Assignee: Diveplane Corporation
    Inventor: Christopher James Hazard
  • Patent number: 11853900
    Abstract: Techniques are provided for determining compatibility of first and second candidate code based on functionality. When the first candidate code and the second candidate code are compatible, third candidate code based is determined based on the first candidate code and the second candidate code. The third candidate that was determined based on the first candidate code and the second candidate code is then provided.
    Type: Grant
    Filed: January 27, 2023
    Date of Patent: December 26, 2023
    Assignee: Diveplane Corporation
    Inventor: Christopher James Hazard