Abstract: A system may receive enterprise information associated with a client enterprise. The system may select, using an industry analysis model, a set of queries associated with obtaining status information that is associated with a technology profile of the client enterprise. The system may generate client data that is associated with the enterprise information and the status information. The system may convert, using a matrix factorization technique, the client data associated with the client enterprise to a client matrix. The system may convert, using the matrix factorization technique, reference data associated with reference enterprises to a reference matrix. The system may determine, based on a comparison of the client matrix and the reference matrix, a set of scores associated with technology metrics of the technology profile. The system may perform an action associated with the client enterprise based on the set of scores.

Abstract: In some implementations, a device may receive training data identifying a set of workflows. The device may generate a set of workflow templates based on the training data identifying the set of workflows, wherein a workflow template, of the set of workflow templates, is associated with a set of steps for completing a task associated with the workflow template. The device may receive, from a client device associated with an entity, a new task for automation using a new workflow. The device may parse the new task to identify one or more steps associated with the new task. The device may identify one or more workflow templates. The device may a workflow recommendation relating to the one or more workflow templates. The device may output workflow data associated with the workflow recommendation.

Abstract: A device may receive, in near-real time, unstructured data associated with an application or a system, and may extract textual data from the unstructured data. The device may parse the textual data to generate parsed textual data, and may perform natural language processing on the parsed textual data to generate processed textual data. The device may process the processed textual data, with a clustering model, to identify topical data associated with the processed textual data, and may process the topical data, with a classification model, to group the topical data into categories. The device may generate a knowledge graph based on the categories, and may store the knowledge graph in a data structure. The knowledge graph may enable the device to provide answers to questions associated with the application or the system.

Abstract: In some implementations, a device may generate, based at least in part on a first set of inputs, a serverless software development environment associated with a set of cloud resources. The device may generate, based at least in part on a first machine learning model, a technology stack recommendation having a set of associated tools for performing a software development task. The device may instantiate the selected technology stack in the serverless software development environment and generate a set of applications based at least in part on executing the set of tools. The device may deploy the set of applications in one or more serverless application environments. The device may use machine learning to observe deployed applications, detect hidden anomalies, and perform root-cause analysis, thereby providing a lean and sustainable serverless environment.

Abstract: A device may receive project management data associated with development of a software product and may process a first portion of the project management data, with first models, to generate timeliness scores and an overall timeliness score for the software product. The device may process a second portion of the project management data, with second models, to generate quality scores and an overall quality score for the software product and may process a third portion of the project management data, with third models, to generate product readiness scores and an overall product readiness score for the software product. The device may utilize a fourth machine learning model, with the overall timeliness score, the overall quality score, and the overall product readiness score, to generate a success probability for the software product and may perform one or more actions based on the success probability for the software product.

Abstract: In some implementations, a scheduling platform may receive task information regarding a set of tasks for execution using a set of computing resources, wherein the task information includes, for the set of tasks, at least one of: a run time parameter, a priority parameter, or a success rate parameter. The scheduling platform may communicate with a computing resource management device to obtain first computing resource information regarding the set of computing resources. The scheduling platform may generate a first assignment of the set of tasks to the set of computing resources. The scheduling platform may transmit assignment information identifying the first assignment. The scheduling platform may receive second computing resource information. The scheduling platform may generate a second assignment of the set of tasks to the set of computing resources. The scheduling platform may transmit second assignment information identifying the second assignment.

Abstract: A device may receive and process a change request, work items, and IT data, to generate processed data. The device may transform the processed data into vectorized data, and may select similarity analytics models, regression models, and a classification model. The device may process the vectorized data, with the similarity analytics models, to determine an estimated effort, a user story, and IT requirements, and may process the vectorized data, with the regression models, to determine a schedule overrun, a defect rate, and a sprint velocity. The device may process the vectorized data, with the classification model, to determine a story point, and may calculate a resource capacity. The device may generate an impact analysis based on the estimated effort, the user story, the IT requirements, the schedule overrun, the defect rate, the sprint velocity, the story point, or the resource capacity, and may perform actions based on the impact analysis.

Abstract: A device may receive software data identifying current logs and events associated with software products utilized by an entity and may process the software data, with a machine learning model, to generate error severity scores for the software products. The machine learning model may be trained based on historical software data identifying events and logs associated with software products utilized by the entity and based on a combination of historical health scores, historical sentiment scores, and historical dissimilarity scores for the software products. The device may process the error severity scores, with a prioritization model, to generate prioritized error scores and may process the error severity scores and the prioritized error scores, with a root cause analysis model, to generate root cause data identifying root causes associated with the error severity scores. The device may perform one or more actions based on the root cause data.

Abstract: In some implementations, a device may generate, based at least in part on a first set of inputs, a serverless software development environment associated with a set of cloud resources. The device may generate, based at least in part on a first machine learning model, a technology stack recommendation having a set of associated tools for performing a software development task. The device may instantiate the selected technology stack in the serverless software development environment and generate a set of applications based at least in part on executing the set of tools. The device may deploy the set of applications in one or more serverless application environments. The device may use machine learning to observe deployed applications, detect hidden anomalies, and perform root-cause analysis, thereby providing a lean and sustainable serverless environment.

Abstract: In some examples, artificial intelligence based project implementation may include implementing, for a project team, self-evaluation of viability for utilizing a project implementation framework. The project team may be guided on utilization of the project implementation framework. A discussion by the project team may be documented in a digital format during envisioning associated with the project implementation framework, and documented information may be maintained for reference during execution, by the project team, of a journey associated with the project implementation framework. During execution of the journey, implementation of a social contract by the project team may be evaluated. A determination may be made as to whether the social contract is not implemented for at least one specified occurrence associated with the project implementation framework, and at least one impediment associated with the project implementation framework may be identified.

Abstract: In some implementations, a device may receive project management data including information related to project elements associated with one or more projects and associations among the project elements associated with the one or more projects. The device may generate one or more data structures representing the project elements associated with the one or more projects and the associations among the project elements associated with the one or more projects. The device may receive a request to visualize project data, wherein the request may indicate a view to use in order to visualize the project data and/or specify criteria related to the project data to be visualized in the view. The device may search the one or more data structures to obtain the project data to be visualized based on the criteria specified in the request. The device may render the project data using the view indicated in the request.

Abstract: In some implementations, a device may receive project management data including text descriptions related to one or more requirements associated with a project. The device may identify a set of work items associated with the project and a set of existing dependencies among the set of work items associated with the project. The device may generate, based on the text descriptions related to the one or more requirements associated with the project, a set of recommended dependencies among the set of work items associated with the project using an artificial intelligence model. The device may generate a user interface to visually indicate information related to the set of existing dependencies and the set of recommended dependencies among the set of work items associated with the project and to provide one or more elements to manage the set of existing dependencies and/or the set of recommended dependencies.

Abstract: A device may obtain first data relating to a machine learning model. The device may pre-process the first data to alter the first data to generate second data. The device may process the second data to select a set of features from the second data. The device may analyze the set of features to evaluate a plurality of types of machine learning models with respect to the set of features. The device may select a particular type of machine learning model for the set of features based on analyzing the set of features to evaluate the plurality of types of machine learning models. The device may tune a set of parameters of the particular type of machine learning model to train the machine learning model. The device may receive third data for prediction. The device may provide a prediction using the particular type of machine learning model.

Abstract: A device may receive workflow data identifying an automation request, and may request jobs for the workflow data. The device may receive encrypted jobs based on the request for the jobs, and may determine whether encryption keys for the encrypted jobs are valid. The device may determine whether workflow portions for the encrypted jobs are valid, and may determine whether to allow or deny each of the encrypted jobs based on whether the encryption keys and the workflow portions are valid. The device may execute the encrypted jobs determined to be allowed, to generate execution results, and may forgo execution of the encrypted jobs determined to be denied. The device may process the execution results and the encrypted jobs determined to be denied, with a machine learning model, to predict a final result for the automation request, and may perform actions based on the final result.

Abstract: A device may receive entity data identifying an entity and may identify harvested templates, contract profiles, and commitment accuracy scores, based on the entity data. The device may process the harvested templates, the contract profiles, and the commitment accuracy scores, with a first machine learning model, to generate first templates and may process the harvested templates, the contract profiles, and the commitment accuracy scores, with a second machine learning model, to generate second templates. The device may process the first templates and the second templates, with a third machine learning model, to generate final templates and final rankings for the final templates and may select a template from the final templates based on the final rankings. The device may process the template, with a fourth machine learning model, to identify deliverables associated with the template and may generate and implement a strategic plan based on the template and the deliverables.

Abstract: A device may receive software data identifying current logs and events associated with software products utilized by an entity and may process the software data, with a machine learning model, to generate error severity scores for the software products. The machine learning model may be trained based on historical software data identifying events and logs associated with software products utilized by the entity and based on a combination of historical health scores, historical sentiment scores, and historical dissimilarity scores for the software products. The device may process the error severity scores, with a prioritization model, to generate prioritized error scores and may process the error severity scores and the prioritized error scores, with a root cause analysis model, to generate root cause data identifying root causes associated with the error severity scores. The device may perform one or more actions based on the root cause data.

Abstract: A device may receive project management data associated with development of a software product and may process a first portion of the project management data, with first models, to generate timeliness scores and an overall timeliness score for the software product. The device may process a second portion of the project management data, with second models, to generate quality scores and an overall quality score for the software product and may process a third portion of the project management data, with third models, to generate product readiness scores and an overall product readiness score for the software product. The device may utilize a fourth machine learning model, with the overall timeliness score, the overall quality score, and the overall product readiness score, to generate a success probability for the software product and may perform one or more actions based on the success probability for the software product.

Abstract: A device may receive image data that includes an image of a document and lexicon data identifying a lexicon, and may perform an extraction technique on the image data to identify at least one field in the document. The device may utilize form segmentation to automatically generate label data identifying labels for the image data, and may process the image data, the label data, and data identifying the at least one field, with a first model, to identify visual features. The device may process the image data and the visual features, with a second model, to identify sequences of characters, and may process the image data and the sequences of characters, with a third model, to identify strings of characters. The device may compare the lexicon data and the strings of characters to generate verified strings of characters that may be utilized to generate a digitized document.

Abstract: A system and method for estimating software project delivery details is disclosed. The disclosed method and system accurately predicts project delivery details (e.g., person-days, effort, full-time equivalent (FTE), etc.) from input text (e.g., text describing a software project requirements) and project input parameters (e.g., variables, such as logical entities, transactions, individual/team proficiency, team level, duration of project, technology, industry domain, etc.) corresponding to a project scenario. In addition to predicting project delivery details, the disclosed system and method can provide a what-if analysis engine that allows a user to understand the possibilities of project scenarios having certain output.

Abstract: A device may receive work item data identifying work items associated with requirements from different tools of a project and may perform data cleansing to remove and/or modify particular words from the work item data and to generate cleansed work item data. The device may perform natural language processing on the cleansed work item data to identify synonyms for words in the cleansed work item data and may replace abbreviations in the cleansed work item data with full form text to generate final work item data. The device may identify keywords in the final work item data and may process the final work item data, the synonyms, and the keywords, with a machine learning model, to identify mappings between work items of the final work item data and to determine a confidence score for the mappings. The device may perform actions based on the mappings and the confidence score.