Abstract: A computer-implemented method, computer program product and computing system for obtaining a provider evaluation model from each of a plurality of providers, resulting in a plurality of provider evaluation models; generating a dynamic evaluation model based, at least in part, upon the plurality of provider evaluation models; receiving a request for an evaluation response; requesting applicant information based, at least in part, upon the dynamic evaluation model, thus defining dynamic applicant information; and revising the dynamic evaluation model to eliminate one or more non-compatible providers based, at least in part, upon a prefix operator.

Abstract: A computer-implemented method, computer program product and computing system for defining dynamic applicant information based, at least in part, upon a dynamic evaluation model; and processing the dynamic applicant information to generate one or more provider specific information sets for one or more providers, wherein the one or more provider specific information sets are based, at least in part, upon one or more provider evaluation models.

Abstract: A computer-implemented method, computer program product and computing system for obtaining a provider evaluation model from each of a plurality of providers, resulting in a plurality of provider evaluation models; generating a dynamic evaluation model based, at least in part, upon the plurality of provider evaluation models; receiving a request for an evaluation response; requesting applicant information based, at least in part, upon the dynamic evaluation model, thus defining dynamic applicant information; and revising the dynamic evaluation model to eliminate one or more non-compatible providers based, at least in part, upon a hypertree-based compatibility structure.

Abstract: A computer-implemented method, computer program product and computing system for obtaining a provider evaluation model from each of a plurality of providers, resulting in a plurality of provider evaluation models; generating a dynamic evaluation model based, at least in part, upon the plurality of provider evaluation models; receiving a request for an evaluation response; requesting applicant information based, at least in part, upon the dynamic evaluation model, thus defining dynamic applicant information; and revising the dynamic evaluation model to eliminate one or more non-compatible providers based, at least in part, upon an overlap operator.

Abstract: A computer-implemented method, computer program product and computing system for obtaining an underwriting model from each of a plurality of insurance providers, resulting in a plurality of underwriting models; generating a dynamic underwriting model based, at least in part, upon the plurality of underwriting models; receiving a request for an insurance quote; requesting applicant information based, at least in part, upon the dynamic underwriting model, thus defining dynamic applicant information; and providing at least a portion of the dynamic applicant information to each of the plurality of insurance providers for the purpose of generating the insurance quote.

Abstract: A computer-implemented method, computer program product and computing system for obtaining a provider evaluation model from each of a plurality of providers, resulting in a plurality of provider evaluation models; generating a dynamic evaluation model based, at least in part, upon the plurality of provider evaluation models; receiving a request for an evaluation response; requesting applicant information based, at least in part, upon the dynamic evaluation model, thus defining dynamic applicant information; and providing at least a portion of the dynamic applicant information to each of the plurality of providers for the purpose of generating the evaluation response.