Abstract: Described herein are systems and methods for discovering and proactively mitigating previously unknown security vulnerabilities. The systems and methods herein can utilize security vulnerability information to discover potential security threats and can utilize this information to generate an attack using a machine learning model, such as a large language model. Generated attacks can be carried out to assess impact of a security vulnerability. An output can be provided that represents the assessed impact. In some implementations, the systems and methods herein generate patches or other mitigations for security vulnerabilities, which can be tested and deployed to address security vulnerabilities.

Abstract: Described herein are systems and methods for discovering and proactively mitigating previously unknown security vulnerabilities. The systems and methods herein can utilize security vulnerability information to discover potential security threats and can utilize this information to generate an attack using a machine learning model, such as a large language model. Generated attacks can be carried out to assess impact of a security vulnerability. An output can be provided that represents the assessed impact. In some implementations, the systems and methods herein generate patches or other mitigations for security vulnerabilities, which can be tested and deployed to address security vulnerabilities.

Abstract: Described herein are systems and methods for discovering and proactively mitigating previously unknown security vulnerabilities. The systems and methods herein can utilize security vulnerability information to discover potential security threats and can utilize this information to generate an attack using a machine learning model, such as a large language model. Generated attacks can be carried out to assess impact of a security vulnerability. An output can be provided that represents the assessed impact. In some implementations, the systems and methods herein generate patches or other mitigations for security vulnerabilities, which can be tested and deployed to address security vulnerabilities.

Abstract: Systems and methods for generating predicted end-to-end cyber-security attack characteristics via bifurcated machine learning-based processing of multi-modal data are disclosed. The system accesses multi-modal data indicating a set of security information related to a computing system. The system then generates a set of extracted characteristics indicating a cyber-security attack on the computing system, via a supervised machine learning model, using the multi-modal data. Using this information, the system generates a revised set of extracted characteristics indicating the cyber-security attack, via an unsupervised machine learning model, using the extracted set of characteristics indicating the cyber-security attack, where the revised set of characteristics includes at least one new characteristic that was not included in the extracted set of characteristics indicating the cyber-security attack on the computing system.

Abstract: Systems and methods for constructing a layered artificial intelligence (AI) model are provided. The technology determines a set of layers and a set of variables for each layer for the AI model, with each layer relating to a specific domain context of the AI model. Using the layers, the AI model is trained to create layer-specific model logic for each layer using the variables of the layer. By applying the layer-specific model logic to incoming command sets, the model produces detailed layer-specific responses. The trained AI model then generates overall responses to command sets by aggregating the layer-specific responses, along with weights for each layer.

Abstract: Described herein are systems and methods for identifying security vulnerabilities. The systems and methods herein can utilize security vulnerability information to identify potential security threats and can utilize this information to generate an attack using a machine learning model, such as a large language model. Generated attacks can be carried out to assess impact of a security vulnerability. An output can be provided that represents the assessed impact. In some implementations, the systems and methods herein generate patches or other mitigations for security vulnerabilities, which can be tested and deployed to address security vulnerabilities.

Abstract: Described herein are systems and methods for verifying the integrity of data, such as data used for training machine learning models. Some implementations are directed to verifying the provenance of datasets, the contents of datasets, or both. In some implementations, multiple filters are selected for verifying the contents of datasets. Filters can be selected based on rules, random selection, or using a machine learning model in some implementations. In some implementations, data cleaning is provided.

Abstract: The systems and methods disclosed herein receives artifacts generated using a first set of models within a multi-model superstructure. The multi-model superstructure includes a second set of models to test the first set of models. The multi-model superstructure dynamically routes the artifacts of the first set of models to one or more models of the second set of models by (i) determining a set of dimensions of the artifacts against which to evaluate the artifacts and (ii) identifying the models in the second set used to test the particular dimension. The second set of models then assesses each artifact against a set of assessment metrics. If an artifact fails to meet one or more assessment metrics, the second set of models generates actions to align the artifact with the set of assessment metrics.

Abstract: Described herein are systems and methods for verifying the integrity of data, such as data used for training machine learning models. Some implementations are directed to verifying the provenance of datasets, the contents of datasets, or both. In some implementations, multiple filters are selected for verifying the contents of datasets. Filters can be selected based on rules, random selection, or using a machine learning model in some implementations. In some implementations, data cleaning is provided.

Abstract: Systems and methods for measuring, grading, evaluating, and comparing AI models via a graphical user interface are disclosed. The technology obtains a set of application domains of the AI model in which an AI model will be used. The application domains are mapped to one or more guidelines to determine a set of guidelines that define operational boundaries of the AI model. The guidelines are used to generate assessment domains, each associated with specific benchmarks that include indicators of a degree of satisfaction with the guidelines. For each assessment domain, assessments are constructed to evaluate the AI model's degree of satisfaction with the corresponding guidelines. The AI model is then evaluated against the assessments. Based on these comparisons, grades are assigned to the AI model for each assessment domain. The application-domain-specific grades are generated and displayed at a GUI, reflecting the AI model's degree of satisfaction with the guidelines.

Abstract: Described herein are systems and methods for identifying security vulnerabilities. The systems and methods herein can utilize security vulnerability information to identify potential security threats and can utilize this information to generate an attack using a machine learning model, such as a large language model. Generated attacks can be carried out to assess impact of a security vulnerability. An output can be provided that represents the assessed impact. In some implementations, the systems and methods herein generate patches or other mitigations for security vulnerabilities, which can be tested and deployed to address security vulnerabilities.

Abstract: Systems and methods for measuring, grading, evaluating, and comparing AI models via a graphical user interface are disclosed. The technology obtains a set of application domains of the AI model in which an AI model will be used. The application domains are mapped to one or more guidelines to determine a set of guidelines that define operational boundaries of the AI model. The guidelines are used to generate assessment domains, each associated with specific benchmarks that include indicators of a degree of satisfaction with the guidelines. For each assessment domain, assessments are constructed to evaluate the AI model's degree of satisfaction with the corresponding guidelines. The AI model is then evaluated against the assessments. Based on these comparisons, grades are assigned to the AI model for each assessment domain. The application-domain-specific grades are generated and displayed at a GUI, reflecting the AI model's degree of satisfaction with the guidelines.

Abstract: Systems and methods for constructing a layered artificial intelligence (AI) model are provided. The technology determines a set of layers and a set of variables for each layer for the AI model, with each layer relating to a specific domain context of the AI model. Using the layers, the AI model is trained to create layer-specific model logic for each layer using the variables of the layer. By applying the layer-specific model logic to incoming command sets, the model produces detailed layer-specific responses. The trained AI model then generates overall responses to command sets by aggregating the layer-specific responses, along with weights for each layer.

Abstract: Systems and methods for evaluating a pre-trained artificial intelligence (AI) model using layered prompts. The system obtains a set of application domains in which the AI model will be used, and a set of guidelines that define one or more operational boundaries of the AI model. The system determines a set of layers, where each layer is associated with corresponding guidelines and mapped to a set of variables and benchmarks. Each variable represents an attribute within the guidelines and each benchmark indicates the degree of satisfaction of the AI model with the guidelines. The AI model is dynamically evaluated against these benchmarks using a series of assessments. Subsequent assessments are dynamically constructed based on the outcomes of previous assessments. Scores are assigned to the AI model for each layer by comparing the expected and actual responses. The results are then displayed in a graphical user interface (GUI).