Patents by Inventor Maxim I. Sviridenko

Maxim I. Sviridenko has filed for patents to protect the following inventions. This listing includes patent applications that are pending as well as patents that have already been granted by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO).

  • Publication number: 20130159206
    Abstract: Determining a routing of vehicles for pickup and delivery in a supply chain network, in one aspect, may include generating a plurality of candidate set of routes for vehicles for pickup and delivery to meet demand at multiple target locations. Unsatisfied demand at said multiple target locations resulting from completing pickup and delivery according to the generated plurality of candidate set of routes may be determined. A set of vehicles routes are selected from said plurality of candidate set of routes that minimizes said unsatisfied demand across all said multiple target locations by applying an optimization function.
    Type: Application
    Filed: December 14, 2011
    Publication date: June 20, 2013
    Applicant: INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION
    Inventors: Francisco Barahona, Peter M. Rimshnick, Maxim I. Sviridenko, Yichong Yu, Zhili Zhou
  • Patent number: 7765301
    Abstract: A benefit task system implements a policy for allocating resources to yield some benefit. The method implemented may be applied to a variety of problems, and the benefit may be either tangible (e.g., profit) or intangible (e.g., customer satisfaction). In one example, the method is applied to server allocation in a Web site server “farm” given full information regarding future loads to maximize profits for the Web hosting service provider. In another example, the method is applied to the allocation of telephone help in a way to improve customer satisfaction. In yet another example, the method is applied to distributed computing problem where the resources to be allocated are general purpose computers connected in a network and used to solve computationally intensive problems.
    Type: Grant
    Filed: February 13, 2006
    Date of Patent: July 27, 2010
    Assignee: International Business Machines Corporation
    Inventors: Tracy J. Kimbrel, Robert Krauthgamer, Maria Minkoff, Baruch M. Schieber, Maxim I. Sviridenko, Jayram S. Thathachar
  • Patent number: 7546247
    Abstract: A method for server allocation in a Web server “farm” is based on limited information regarding future loads to achieve close to the greatest possible revenue based on the assumption that revenue is proportional to the utilization of servers and differentiated by customer class. The method of server allocation uses an approach of “discounting the future”. Specifically, when the policy faces the choice between a guaranteed benefit immediately and a potential benefit in the future, the decision is made by comparing the guaranteed benefit value with a discounted value of the potential future benefit. This discount factor is exponential in the number of time units that it would take a potential benefit to be materialized. The future benefits are discounted because by the time a benefit will be materialized, things might change and the algorithm might decide to make another choice for a potential (even greater) benefit.
    Type: Grant
    Filed: September 26, 2007
    Date of Patent: June 9, 2009
    Assignee: International Business Machines Corporation
    Inventors: Tracy J. Kimbrel, Robert Krauthgarner, Baruch M. Schieber, Maxim I. Sviridenko, Jayram S. Thathachar
  • Patent number: 7308415
    Abstract: A method for server allocation in a Web server “farm” is based on limited information regarding future loads to achieve close to the greatest possible revenue based on the assumption that revenue is proportional to the utilization of servers and differentiated by customer class. The method of server allocation uses an approach of “discounting the future”. Specifically, when the policy faces the choice between a guaranteed benefit immediately and a potential benefit in the future, the decision is made by comparing the guaranteed benefit value with a discounted value of the potential future benefit. This discount factor is exponential in the number of time units that it would take a potential benefit to be materialized. The future benefits are discounted because by the time a benefit will be materialized, things might change and the algorithm might decide to make another choice for a potential (even greater) benefit.
    Type: Grant
    Filed: December 4, 2001
    Date of Patent: December 11, 2007
    Assignee: International Business Machines Corporation
    Inventors: Tracy J. Kimbrel, Robert Krauthgamer, Maria Minkoff, Baruch M. Schieber, Maxim I. Sviridenko, Jayram S. Thathachar
  • Patent number: 7085837
    Abstract: A benefit task system implements a policy for allocating resources to yield some benefit. The method implemented may be applied to a variety of problems, and the benefit may be either tangible (e.g., profit) or intangible (e.g., customer satisfaction). In one example, the method is applied to server allocation in a Web site server “farm” given full information regarding future loads to maximize profits for the Web hosting service provider. In another example, the method is applied to the allocation of telephone help in a way to improve customer satisfaction. In yet another example, the method is applied to distributed computing problem where the resources to be allocated are general purpose computers connected in a network and used to solve computationally intensive problems.
    Type: Grant
    Filed: December 4, 2001
    Date of Patent: August 1, 2006
    Assignee: International Business Machines Corporation
    Inventors: Tracy J. Kimbrel, Robert Krauthgamer, Baruch M. Schieber, Maxim I. Sviridenko, Jayram S. Thathachar, Maria Minkoff
  • Publication number: 20030105868
    Abstract: A benefit task system implements a policy for allocating resources to yield some benefit. The method implemented may be applied to a variety of problems, and the benefit may be either tangible (e.g., profit) or intangible (e.g., customer satisfaction). In one example, the method is applied to server allocation in a Web site server “farm” given full information regarding future loads to maximize profits for the Web hosting service provider. In another example, the method is applied to the allocation of telephone help in a way to improve customer satisfaction. In yet another example, the method is applied to distributed computing problem where the resources to be allocated are general purpose computers connected in a network and used to solve computationally intensive problems.
    Type: Application
    Filed: December 4, 2001
    Publication date: June 5, 2003
    Inventors: Tracy J. Kimbrel, Robert Krauthgamer, Baruch M. Schieber, Maxim I. Sviridenko, Jayram S. Thathachar
  • Publication number: 20030105655
    Abstract: A method for server allocation in a Web server “farm” is based on limited information regarding future loads to achieve close to the greatest possible revenue based on the assumption that revenue is proportional to the utilization of servers and differentiated by customer class. The method of server allocation uses an approach of “discounting the future”. Specifically, when the policy faces the choice between a guaranteed benefit immediately and a potential benefit in the future, the decision is made by comparing the guaranteed benefit value with a discounted value of the potential future benefit. This discount factor is exponential in the number of time units that it would take a potential benefit to be materialized. The future benefits are discounted because by the time a benefit will be materialized, things might change and the algorithm might decide to make another choice for a potential (even greater) benefit.
    Type: Application
    Filed: December 4, 2001
    Publication date: June 5, 2003
    Inventors: Tracy J. Kimbrel, Robert Krauthgamer, Maria Minkoff, Baruch M. Schieber, Maxim I. Sviridenko, Jayram S. Thathachar