Abstract: A method, computer program product, and computer system for defining, at a computing device, one or more channels for executing one or more test scenarios. One or more keyword keywords, each with one or more associated keyword implementations for at least one channel of the one or more channels, are defined. One or more test scenarios is defined, wherein at least one test scenario of the one or more test scenarios includes at least one keyword implementation of the one or more keywords.

Abstract: A method, computer program product, and computer system for defining, at a computing device, one or more channels for executing one or more test scenarios. One or more keyword keywords, each with one or more associated keyword implementations for at least one channel of the one or more channels, are defined. One or more test scenarios is defined, wherein at least one test scenario of the one or more test scenarios includes at least one keyword implementation of the one or more keywords.

Abstract: A method, computer program product, and computer system for defining, at a computing device, one or more channels for executing one or more test scenarios. One or more keyword keywords, each with one or more associated keyword implementations for at least one channel of the one or more channels, are defined. One or more test scenarios is defined, wherein at least one test scenario of the one or more test scenarios includes at least one keyword implementation of the one or more keywords.

Abstract: A method, computer program product, and computer system for defining, at a computing device, one or more channels for executing one or more test scenarios. One or more keyword keywords, each with one or more associated keyword implementations for at least one channel of the one or more channels, are defined. One or more test scenarios is defined, wherein at least one test scenario of the one or more test scenarios includes at least one keyword implementation of the one or more keywords.

Abstract: A state transition model is dynamically generated for an active application. A graphical user interface is generated based upon, at least in part, the state transition model for the active application. The graphical user interface includes an indication of a current state of a record within the active application. The record is manipulated within the active application in response to an input received in association with the graphical user interface.

Abstract: A computer analyzes application lifecycle management data to calculate waste and inefficiency. The computer receives application lifecycle management (ALM) data that includes workflow artifacts, workflow artifact states, and linkage between the workflow artifacts. The ALM data also includes time stamps associated with the workflow artifacts and linkages. The computer calculates lag time between the time stamps of the ALM data. The lag times measure the timeliness of collaboration and communication within a software development project, and based on the calculated lag times or averages, the computer generates visualizations including value steam maps, lag time visualizations or waste reduction visualizations. These visualizations can monitor the performance of a team or can be used to compare the performance of multiple teams throughout a software development project.

Abstract: A computer analyzes application lifecycle management data to calculate waste and inefficiency. The computer receives application lifecycle management (ALM) data that includes workflow artifacts, workflow artifact states, and linkage between the workflow artifacts. The ALM data also includes time stamps associated with the workflow artifacts and linkages. The computer calculates lag time between the time stamps of the ALM data. The lag times measure the timeliness of collaboration and communication within a software development project, and based on the calculated lag times or averages, the computer generates visualizations including value steam maps, lag time visualizations or waste reduction visualizations. These visualizations can monitor the performance of a team or can be used to compare the performance of multiple teams throughout a software development project.

Abstract: A state transition model is dynamically generated for an active application. A graphical user interface is generated based upon, at least in part, the state transition model for the active application. The graphical user interface includes an indication of a current state of a record within the active application. The record is manipulated within the active application in response to an input received in association with the graphical user interface.

Abstract: Embodiments of the present invention provide a method, system and computer program product for dynamic computation of return on investment (ROI) for test automation. In an embodiment of the invention, a method for dynamic computation of ROI for test automation can include storing a development cost for an automated test tool configured to test an application under test, and also a cost of manually executing a test case for the application under test. The method also can include repeatedly executing the automated test tool for the application under test. Of note, the method can include computing a running ROI as a difference between a number of executions of the automated test tool by the cost of manually executing the test case for the application under test less the development cost of the automated test tool divided by the development cost. Finally, the method can include displaying the running ROI.