Abstract: Methods and systems for content distribution and management are presented. A transaction flow for conducting different stages of a transaction is determined in response to a request for the transaction from an application executable at a user device. The transaction flow includes a sequence of content pages to be displayed within a graphical user interface (GUI) of the application over the different stages of the transaction. The content associated with a tagged UI element of at least one content page is identified. The content is validated for the tagged UI element of the at least one content page, based on a software and hardware configuration of the user device. The validated content is provided via a network to the application at the user device to be displayable with the tagged UI element on the at least one content page of the transaction flow during a corresponding stage of the transaction.

Abstract: Machine learning techniques are disclosed that allow device contact list information to be leveraged in building better models that provide more accurate assessment of user transaction risks. A computing device may receive a contact list that includes a first set of user device identifiers and generates a contact graph for that user by associating the user device identifier with the first set as first-degree contacts. The computing device may then determine that a portion of the first set of the user device identifiers are stored in a contact database (e.g. on a server) and generate a user score based on user information associated with the first set, the contact graph, and a contact graph model. The computing device may provide the user score to a transaction assessment service as in input for the transaction assessment service deciding whether particular electronic transactions are approved for processing by an electronic service provider.

Abstract: Methods and systems for content distribution and management are presented. A transaction flow for conducting different stages of a transaction is determined in response to a request for the transaction from an application executable at a user device. The transaction flow includes a sequence of content pages to be displayed within a graphical user interface (GUI) of the application over the different stages of the transaction. The content associated with a tagged UI element of at least one content page is identified. The content is validated for the tagged UI element of the at least one content page, based on a software and hardware configuration of the user device. The validated content is provided via a network to the application at the user device to be displayable with the tagged UI element on the at least one content page of the transaction flow during a corresponding stage of the transaction.

Abstract: Machine learning techniques are disclosed that allow device contact list information to be leveraged in building better models that provide more accurate assessment of user transaction risks. A computing device may receive a contact list that includes a first set of user device identifiers and generates a contact graph for that user by associating the user device identifier with the first set as first-degree contacts. The computing device may then determine that a portion of the first set of the user device identifiers are stored in a contact database (e.g. on a server) and generate a user score based on user information associated with the first set, the contact graph, and a contact graph model. The computing device may provide the user score to a transaction assessment service as in input for the transaction assessment service deciding whether particular electronic transactions are approved for processing by an electronic service provider.

Abstract: Machine learning techniques are disclosed that allow device contact list information to be leveraged in building better models that provide more accurate assessment of user transaction risks. A computing device may receive a contact list that includes a first set of user device identifiers and generates a contact graph for that user by associating the user device identifier with the first set as first-degree contacts. The computing device may then determine that a portion of the first set of the user device identifiers are stored in a contact database (e.g. on a server) and generate a user score based on user information associated with the first set, the contact graph, and a contact graph model. The computing device may provide the user score to a transaction assessment service as in input for the transaction assessment service deciding whether particular electronic transactions are approved for processing by an electronic service provider.

Abstract: Machine learning techniques are disclosed that allow device contact list information to be leveraged in building better models that provide more accurate assessment of user transaction risks. A computing device may receive a contact list that includes a first set of user device identifiers and generates a contact graph for that user by associating the user device identifier with the first set as first-degree contacts. The computing device may then determine that a portion of the first set of the user device identifiers are stored in a contact database (e.g. on a server) and generate a user score based on user information associated with the first set, the contact graph, and a contact graph model. The computing device may provide the user score to a transaction assessment service as in input for the transaction assessment service deciding whether particular electronic transactions are approved for processing by an electronic service provider.