Patents by Inventor Patrick Crenshaw

Patrick Crenshaw has filed for patents to protect the following inventions. This listing includes patent applications that are pending as well as patents that have already been granted by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO).

  • Patent number: 11811821
    Abstract: Example techniques described herein determine a validation dataset, determine a computational model using the validation dataset, or determine a signature or classification of a data stream such as a file. The classification can indicate whether the data stream is associated with malware. A processing unit can determine signatures of individual training data streams. The processing unit can determine, based at least in part on the signatures and a predetermined difference criterion, a training set and a validation set of the training data streams. The processing unit can determine a computational model based at least in part on the training set. The processing unit can then operate the computational model based at least in part on a trial data stream to provide a trial model output. Some examples include determining the validation set based at least in part on the training set and the predetermined criterion for difference between data streams.
    Type: Grant
    Filed: November 2, 2020
    Date of Patent: November 7, 2023
    Assignee: CrowdStrike, Inc.
    Inventors: Sven Krasser, David Elkind, Brett Meyer, Patrick Crenshaw
  • Publication number: 20210075798
    Abstract: Example techniques described herein determine a validation dataset, determine a computational model using the validation dataset, or determine a signature or classification of a data stream such as a file. The classification can indicate whether the data stream is associated with malware. A processing unit can determine signatures of individual training data streams. The processing unit can determine, based at least in part on the signatures and a predetermined difference criterion, a training set and a validation set of the training data streams. The processing unit can determine a computational model based at least in part on the training set. The processing unit can then operate the computational model based at least in part on a trial data stream to provide a trial model output. Some examples include determining the validation set based at least in part on the training set and the predetermined criterion for difference between data streams.
    Type: Application
    Filed: November 2, 2020
    Publication date: March 11, 2021
    Inventors: Sven Krasser, David Elkind, Brett Meyer, Patrick Crenshaw
  • Patent number: 10832168
    Abstract: Example techniques described herein determine a signature or classification of a data stream such as a file. The classification can indicate whether the data stream is associated with malware. A processor can locate training analysis regions of training data streams based on predetermined structure data, and determining training model inputs based on the training analysis regions. The processor can determine a computational model based on the training model inputs. The computational model can receive an input vector and provide a corresponding feature vector. The processor can then locate a trial analysis region of a trial data stream based on the predetermined structure data and determine a trial model input. The processor can operate the computational model based on the trial model input to provide a trial feature vector, e.g., a signature. The processor can operate a second computational model to provide a classification based on the signature.
    Type: Grant
    Filed: January 10, 2017
    Date of Patent: November 10, 2020
    Assignee: CrowdStrike, Inc.
    Inventors: Sven Krasser, David Elkind, Patrick Crenshaw, Brett Meyer
  • Patent number: 10826934
    Abstract: Example techniques described herein determine a validation dataset, determine a computational model using the validation dataset, or determine a signature or classification of a data stream such as a file. The classification can indicate whether the data stream is associated with malware. A processing unit can determine signatures of individual training data streams. The processing unit can determine, based at least in part on the signatures and a predetermined difference criterion, a training set and a validation set of the training data streams. The processing unit can determine a computational model based at least in part on the training set. The processing unit can then operate the computational model based at least in part on a trial data stream to provide a trial model output. Some examples include determining the validation set based at least in part on the training set and the predetermined criterion for difference between data streams.
    Type: Grant
    Filed: January 10, 2017
    Date of Patent: November 3, 2020
    Assignee: CrowdStrike, Inc.
    Inventors: Sven Krasser, David Elkind, Brett Meyer, Patrick Crenshaw
  • Patent number: 10726128
    Abstract: Example techniques herein determine that a trial data stream is associated with malware (“dirty”) using a local computational model (CM). The data stream can be represented by a feature vector. A control unit can receive a first, dirty feature vector (e.g., a false miss) and determine the local CM based on the first feature vector. The control unit can receive a trial feature vector representing the trial data stream. The control unit can determine that the trial data stream is dirty if a broad CM or the local CM determines that the trial feature vector is dirty. In some examples, the local CM can define a dirty region in a feature space. The control unit can determine the local CM based on the first feature vector and other clean or dirty feature vectors, e.g., a clean feature vector nearest to the first feature vector.
    Type: Grant
    Filed: July 24, 2017
    Date of Patent: July 28, 2020
    Assignee: CrowdStrike, Inc.
    Inventors: Sven Krasser, David Elkind, Patrick Crenshaw, Kirby James Koster
  • Publication number: 20190273509
    Abstract: Example techniques described herein determine a classification of a variable-length source data such as an executable code. A neural network system that includes a convolution filter, a recurrent neural network, and a fully connected layer can be configured in a computing device to classify executable code. The neural network system can receive executable code of variable length and reduce its dimensionality by generating a variable-length sequence of features extracted from the executable code. The sequence of features is filtered, and applied to one or more recurrent neural networks and to a neural network. The output of the neural network classifies the data. Other disclosed systems include a system for reducing the dimensionality of command line input using a recurrent neural network. The reduced dimensionality of command line input may be classified using the disclosed neural network systems.
    Type: Application
    Filed: March 1, 2018
    Publication date: September 5, 2019
    Inventors: David Elkind, Patrick Crenshaw, Sven Krasser
  • Publication number: 20190273510
    Abstract: Example techniques described herein determine a classification of a variable-length source data such as an executable code. A neural network system that includes a convolution filter, a recurrent neural network, and a fully connected layer can be configured in a computing device to classify executable code. The neural network system can receive executable code of variable length and reduce its dimensionality by generating a variable-length sequence of features extracted from the executable code. The sequence of features is filtered, and applied to one or more recurrent neural networks and to a neural network. The output of the neural network classifies the data. Other disclosed systems include a system for reducing the dimensionality of command line input using a recurrent neural network. The reduced dimensionality of command line input may be classified using the disclosed neural network systems.
    Type: Application
    Filed: March 1, 2018
    Publication date: September 5, 2019
    Inventors: David Elkind, Patrick Crenshaw, Sven Krasser
  • Publication number: 20190026466
    Abstract: Example techniques herein determine that a trial data stream is associated with malware (“dirty”) using a local computational model (CM). The data stream can be represented by a feature vector. A control unit can receive a first, dirty feature vector (e.g., a false miss) and determine the local CM based on the first feature vector. The control unit can receive a trial feature vector representing the trial data stream. The control unit can determine that the trial data stream is dirty if a broad CM or the local CM determines that the trial feature vector is dirty. In some examples, the local CM can define a dirty region in a feature space. The control unit can determine the local CM based on the first feature vector and other clean or dirty feature vectors, e.g., a clean feature vector nearest to the first feature vector.
    Type: Application
    Filed: July 24, 2017
    Publication date: January 24, 2019
    Inventors: Sven Krasser, David Elkind, Patrick Crenshaw, Kirby James Koster
  • Publication number: 20180198800
    Abstract: Example techniques described herein determine a validation dataset, determine a computational model using the validation dataset, or determine a signature or classification of a data stream such as a file. The classification can indicate whether the data stream is associated with malware. A processing unit can determine signatures of individual training data streams. The processing unit can determine, based at least in part on the signatures and a predetermined difference criterion, a training set and a validation set of the training data streams. The processing unit can determine a computational model based at least in part on the training set. The processing unit can then operate the computational model based at least in part on a trial data stream to provide a trial model output. Some examples include determining the validation set based at least in part on the training set and the predetermined criterion for difference between data streams.
    Type: Application
    Filed: January 10, 2017
    Publication date: July 12, 2018
    Inventors: Sven Krasser, David Elkind, Brett Meyer, Patrick Crenshaw
  • Publication number: 20180197089
    Abstract: Example techniques described herein determine a signature or classification of a data stream such as a file. The classification can indicate whether the data stream is associated with malware. A processor can locate training analysis regions of training data streams based on predetermined structure data, and determining training model inputs based on the training analysis regions. The processor can determine a computational model based on the training model inputs. The computational model can receive an input vector and provide a corresponding feature vector. The processor can then locate a trial analysis region of a trial data stream based on the predetermined structure data and determine a trial model input. The processor can operate the computational model based on the trial model input to provide a trial feature vector, e.g., a signature. The processor can operate a second computational model to provide a classification based on the signature.
    Type: Application
    Filed: January 10, 2017
    Publication date: July 12, 2018
    Inventors: Sven Krasser, David Elkind, Patrick Crenshaw, Brett Meyer