Abstract: Machine learning model data privacy can be maintained by training a machine learning model forming part of a data science process using data anonymized using each of two or more differential privacy mechanisms. Thereafter, it is determined, for each of the two or more differential privacy mechanisms, a level of accuracy and a level precision when evaluating data with known classifications. Subsequently, using the respective determined levels of precision and accuracy, a mitigation efficiency ratio is determined for each of the two or more differential privacy mechanisms. The differential privacy mechanism having a highest mitigation efficiency ratio is then incorporated into the data science process. Related apparatus, systems, techniques and articles are also described.

Abstract: Data is received that specifies a bound for an adversarial posterior belief ?c that corresponds to a likelihood to re-identify data points from the dataset based on a differentially private function output. Privacy parameters ?, ? are then calculated based on the received data that govern a differential privacy (DP) algorithm to be applied to a function to be evaluated over a dataset. The calculating is based on a ratio of probabilities distributions of different observations, which are bound by the posterior belief ?c as applied to a dataset. The calculated privacy parameters are then used to apply the DP algorithm to the function over the dataset. Related apparatus, systems, techniques and articles are also described.

Abstract: Machine learning model data privacy can be maintained by training a machine learning model forming part of a data science process using data anonymized using each of two or more differential privacy mechanisms. Thereafter, it is determined, for each of the two or more differential privacy mechanisms, a level of accuracy and a level precision when evaluating data with known classifications. Subsequently, using the respective determined levels of precision and accuracy, a mitigation efficiency ratio is determined for each of the two or more differential privacy mechanisms. The differential privacy mechanism having a highest mitigation efficiency ratio is then incorporated into the data science process. Related apparatus, systems, techniques and articles are also described.

Abstract: Methods, systems, and computer-readable storage media for privacy preserving metering is described herein. A resource threshold value associated with anonymizing meter data for resources metered at a first destination is received. Based on a noise scale value and the resource threshold value, an individual inference value of the first destination is computed. The individual inference value defines a probability of distinguishing the first destination as a contributor to a query result based on anonymized meter data of the first destination and other destinations according to the noise scale value. The noise scale value is defined for a processing application. Based on evaluating the individual inference value, it is determined to provide anonymized meter data for metered resources at the first destination. An activation of a communication channel for providing the anonymized meter data for metered resources is triggered.