Abstract: A load balancing technology segregates various inventory types (e.g., potatoes vs. milk, vs. pretzels, vs. tissue paper, etc.) based upon how frequently they are ordered in a distribution center. Inventory types that are ordered at the slowest rate are not “replicated” over multiple pods in the distribution center. Rather, they are constrained to reside at a single pod within the distribution center. Items that are ordered somewhat more frequently than those in the slowest group are replicated in multiple pods across the distribution center. In other words, these items are separately stocked at locations on more than one pod in the distribution center. This means that a container passing through the distribution center can obtain each of the items in the second group of item types at multiple pods in the distribution center. Thus, these items do not create a bottleneck in the order fulfillment process. Inventory types in a third group, the fastest movers, are segregated from items in the first two groups.

Abstract: A load balancing technology segregates various inventory types (e.g., potatoes vs. milk, vs. pretzels, vs. tissue paper, etc.) based upon how frequently they are ordered in a distribution center. Inventory types that are ordered at the slowest rate are not “replicated” over multiple pods in the distribution center. Rather, they are constrained to reside at a single pod within the distribution center. Items that are ordered somewhat more frequently than those in the slowest group are replicated in multiple pods across the distribution center. In other words, these items are separately stocked at locations on more than one pod in the distribution center. This means that a container passing through the distribution center can obtain each of the items in the second group of item types at multiple pods in the distribution center. Thus, these items do not create a bottleneck in the order fulfillment process. Inventory types in a third group, the fastest movers, are segregated from items in the first two groups.

Abstract: A load balancing technology segregates various inventory types (e.g., potatoes vs. milk, vs. pretzels, vs. tissue paper, etc.) based upon how frequently they are ordered in a distribution center. Inventory types that are ordered at the slowest rate are not “replicated” over multiple pods in the distribution center. Rather, they are constrained to reside at a single pod within the distribution center. Items that are ordered somewhat more frequently than those in the slowest group are replicated in multiple pods across the distribution center. In other words, these items are separately stocked at locations on more than one pod in the distribution center. This means that a container passing through the distribution center can obtain each of the items in the second group of item types at multiple pods in the distribution center. Thus, these items do not create a bottleneck in the order fulfillment process. Inventory types in a third group, the fastest movers, are segregated from items in the first two groups.

Abstract: A method and apparatus for communicating between a called routine written in a first programming language and calling routine written in a second programming language is described. User input specifies an interface of a proxy routine and the interface parameters of the interface. Metadata that is generated establishes a mapping of interface parameters to the routine parameters of the called routine. At least one interface parameter is of a data type not supported in the first programming language. The user input may specify that a first attribute of a particular interface parameter is associated with a first routine parameter of the called routine, and a second attribute of the particular interface parameter is associated with a second routine parameter of the called routine. The metadata maps the first attribute to the first routine parameter, and the second attribute to the second routine parameter.

Abstract: A method and apparatus for communicating between a called routine written in a first programming language and calling routine written in a second programming language is described. User input that is received specifies an interface of a proxy routine and the interface parameters of the interface. Metadata that is generated establishes a mapping of interface parameters to the routine parameters of the called routine. At least one interface parameter is of a data type not supported in the first programming language. The user input may specify that a first attribute of a particular interface parameter is associated with a first routine parameter of the called routine, and a second attribute of the particular interface parameter is associated with a second routine parameter of the called routine. The metadata maps the first attribute to the first routine parameter, and the second attribute to the second routine parameter.