Patents by Inventor Reinder Bril

Reinder Bril has filed for patents to protect the following inventions. This listing includes patent applications that are pending as well as patents that have already been granted by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO).

  • Publication number: 20080022287
    Abstract: A method (10) for controlling multiple tasks in a real-time operating system (30) assigns levels of importance to two or more tasks (31, 32). A first task (31) is assigned to be a More Important Task. A second task (32) is assigned to be a Less Important Task. A Guaranteed Budget Margin is then allocated to the More Important Task along with a More Important Guaranteed Budget. A Less Important Guaranteed Budget is also allocated to the Less Important Task. At some point during execution, the higher level or More Important Task (31) may then determine that the More Important Task no longer requires the Guaranteed Budget Margin, in which case, a Conditionally Guaranteed Budget Margin is then allocated to the Less Important Task (32), but only if the More Important Guaranteed Budget is depleted.
    Type: Application
    Filed: March 28, 2005
    Publication date: January 24, 2008
    Applicant: KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS ELECTRONICS, N.V.
    Inventor: Reinder Bril
  • Publication number: 20070220523
    Abstract: A method for operating a terminal having at least one resource and executing at least one application in real-time, wherein the execution of the application requires execution of at least two tasks, comprises selecting operating points for each of the tasks from a predetermined set without knowing all implementation details. The method further comprises determining at least one implementation parameter for the selected quality-resource utilization operating point, wherein the determining is performed for each of the tasks, and wherein the determined implementation parameter is different than the quality and resource utilization, and executing the tasks with their determined implementation parameter.
    Type: Application
    Filed: March 20, 2007
    Publication date: September 20, 2007
    Applicants: Interuniversitair Microelektronica Centrum (IMEC), Koninklijke Philips Electronic N.V.
    Inventors: Gauthier LaFruit, Elisabeth Steffens, Reinder Bril
  • Publication number: 20070124733
    Abstract: A method and apparatus is provided for use by a scheduler of a multi-processor data processing system to select task preemption points based on main memory requirements. There are three alternative preferred embodiments, depending on the allocation of tasks to processors: (1) Fixed Allocation: every task is allocated to a particular processor, i.e. each task exclusively executes on a given processor. This embodiment is preferred when processors are dedicated, i.e., where each processor differs essentially from every other processor; (2) Variable Allocation: every task may execute on every processor. At run-time the scheduler determines which processor executes which task. A task may be preempted while running on one processor, and later continue on another. This embodiment is preferred when all the processors are identical; and (3) Mixed Allocation: every task is allocated to a subset of processors.
    Type: Application
    Filed: January 5, 2005
    Publication date: May 31, 2007
    Applicant: Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.
    Inventors: Reinder Bril, Dietwig Lowet
  • Publication number: 20070083863
    Abstract: A method (60) for controlling multiple tasks in a real-time operating system (110, 170) assigns priorities to two or more tasks (114, 115; 174, 175). A first task (114; 174) is assigned to be a More Important Task. A second task (115; 175) is assigned to be a Less Important Task. Each task is explicitly informed of its budget allocations. A Guaranteed Budget Margin is then allocated to the More Important Task along with a More Important Guaranteed Budget. A Less Important Guaranteed Budget is also allocated to the Less Important Task. At some point during execution, the higher priority or More Important Task (114; 174) may then determine that the More Important Task no longer requires the Guaranteed Budget Margin, in which case, a Conditionally Guaranteed Budget Margin is then allocated to the Less Important Task (115; 175).
    Type: Application
    Filed: November 11, 2004
    Publication date: April 12, 2007
    Applicant: KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS ELECTRONICS N.V.
    Inventors: Reinder Bril, Elisabeth Steffens
  • Publication number: 20070022423
    Abstract: A method and apparatus is provided for use by a scheduler of a multi-processing data processing system to select task preemption points based on main memory requirements and exclusive resource usage that is cost-effective and that maintains system consistency and, in particular, enables additional preemption strategies in which: matching synchronization primitives do not span a preemption point, i.e., sub job boundary; for a particular resource Rk, all intervals/sub-jobs of all tasks that use this resource (and protect it by using synchronization primitives) are either all preemptible or all non-preemptible—i. in case they are all preemptible the synchronization primitives must be executed, and ii.
    Type: Application
    Filed: November 4, 2004
    Publication date: January 25, 2007
    Inventors: Reinder Bril, Dietwig Lowet
  • Publication number: 20060212869
    Abstract: This invention is concerned with apparatus and a method for resource management and is particularly suited to resource management of real-time systems. In particular, the invention is concerned with memory management of applications running on low cost systems where the amount of main memory is limited. The invention provides a method of scheduling a plurality of tasks in a data processing system, each task having suspension data specifying suspension of the task based on memory usage associated therewith, the method including: processing one of the plurality of tasks; monitoring for an input indicative of memory usage of the task matching the suspension data associated with the task; suspending processing of said task on the basis of said monitored input; and processing a different one of the plurality.
    Type: Application
    Filed: April 5, 2004
    Publication date: September 21, 2006
    Applicant: KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS ELECTRONICS N.V.
    Inventors: Reinder Bril, Dietwig Lowet
  • Publication number: 20050244064
    Abstract: This invention relates to processing of a media signal in a media system. The media system can be a PC, a Digital TV, a Settop-Box or a Display. The method includes the steps of: monitoring, by a system control unit, a progress and a resource usage (18) of the processing of the media signal; determining, by a structural load control or indicator unit, a first point in time (1) for a substantial load change (19) of a content; determining, by the system control unit, a second point (2) in time based on the first point; decreasing, by the system control unit, an assigned quality level (13) of at least one scalable algorithm at the second point in time; and adapting, by the system control unit, the assigned quality level of at least one scalable algorithm at or till a third point in time, wherein a realized quality level (17) will become stable within a period of adaptation time. Said substantial load change of content can be caused by a shot or a scene change.
    Type: Application
    Filed: May 16, 2003
    Publication date: November 3, 2005
    Applicant: Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.
    Inventors: Christian Hentschel, Maria Gabrani, Reinder Bril, Elisabeth Steffens
  • Publication number: 20050174352
    Abstract: A digital video processing system is disclosed in which processing modules use less data packets than in the regular situation in which there enough data is received. In case of a channel change, the digital video processing system can, during a time period in which there is a lack of data, produce more images than the prior art systems. These images have lower quality than the ones that result from regular processing, but a person will perceive the image quality to be higher than the one of the prior art.
    Type: Application
    Filed: December 16, 2002
    Publication date: August 11, 2005
    Inventors: Maria Gabrani, Christian Hentschel, Elisabeth Steffens, Reinder Bril
  • Publication number: 20050012861
    Abstract: A method and a system of adaptive processing of a media signal on a media system. The media system can be VCR, TV, set-top box, storage or a display. The method includes the steps of requesting resources (1001) by an algorithm to provide a plurality of output quality levels, allocating a butlget (1002) to the algorithm, determining progress (1003) of the media signal, determining budget used (1004); and setting a quality level for media signal processing based on the progress, the allocated budget and the budget used (1005). The method further includes the steps of storing historical information (1006) about the processing; and further setting the quality level for media signal processing based on the stored historical information (1007). The historical information includes the budget allocated, the determined progress, the budget used, the set and or achieved quality levels. The progress quality levels are increased or decreased dependent on the ratio of the budget used to the allocated budget.
    Type: Application
    Filed: December 6, 2002
    Publication date: January 20, 2005
    Inventors: Christian Hentschel, Cornelis Conradus Van Zon, Maria Gabrani, Reinder Bril, Elisabeth Steffens