Abstract: In one embodiment, a semantic classifier input and a corresponding label attributed to the semantic classifier input may be obtained. A determination may be made whether the corresponding label is correct based on logged interaction data. An entry of an adaptation corpus may be generated based on a result of the determination. Operation of the semantic classifier may be adapted based on the adaptation corpus.

Abstract: In one embodiment, a semantic classifier input and a corresponding label attributed to the semantic classifier input may be obtained. A determination may be made whether the corresponding label is correct based on logged interaction data. An entry of an adaptation corpus may be generated based on a result of the determination. Operation of the semantic classifier may be adapted based on the adaptation corpus.

Abstract: In one embodiment, a semantic classifier input and a corresponding label attributed to the semantic classifier input may be obtained. A determination may be made whether the corresponding label is correct based on logged interaction data. An entry of an adaptation corpus may be generated based on a result of the determination. Operation of the semantic classifier may be adapted based on the adaptation corpus.

Abstract: A system for understanding entries, such as speech, develops a classifier by employing prior knowledge with which a given corpus of training entries is enlarged threefold. A rule is created for each of the labels employed in the classifier, and the created rules are applied to the given corpus to create a corpus of attachments by appending a weight of ?p(x), or 1??p(x), to labels of entries that meet, or fail to meet, respectively, conditions of the labels' rules, and to also create a corpus of non-attachments by appending a weight of 1??p(x), or ?p(x), to labels of entries that meet, or fail to meet conditions of the labels' rules.

Abstract: A system for understanding entries, such as speech, develops a classifier by employing prior knowledge with which a given corpus of training entries is enlarged threefold. A rule is created for each of the labels employed in the classifyier, and the created rules are applied to the given corpus to create a corpus of attachments by appending a weight of ?p(x), or 1??p(x), to labels of entries that meet, or fail to meet, respectively, conditions of the labels' rules, and to also create a corpus of non-attachments by appending a weight of 1??p(x), or ?p(x), to labels of entries that meet, or fail to meet conditions of the labels' rules.

Abstract: A system for understanding entries, such as speech, develops a classifier by employing prior knowledge with which a given corpus of training entries is enlarged threefold. The prior knowledge is embodied in a rule, combined from separate rules created for each label outputted by the classifier, each of which includes a weight measure p(x). A first a set of created entries for increasing the corpus of training entries is created by attaching all labels to each entry of the original corpus of training entries, with a weight &eegr;p(x), or &eegr;(1−p(x)), in association with each label that meets, or fails to meet, the condition specified for the label, &eegr; being a preselected positive number. The second set of is created by not attaching any of the labels to each of the original corpus of training entries, with a weight of &eegr;(1−p(x)), or &eegr;p(x), in association with each label that meets, or fails to meet, the condition specified for the label.

Abstract: A method and apparatus are provided for multi-class, mutli-label information categorization. A weight is assigned to each information sample in a training set, the training set containing a plurality of information samples, such as text documents, and associated labels. A base hypothesis is determined to predict which labels are associated with a given information sample. The base hypothesis predicts whether or not each label is associated with information sample or predicts the likelihood that each label is associated with the information sample. In the case of a document, the base hypothesis evaluates words in each document to determine one or more words that predict the associated labels. When a base hypothesis is determined, the weight assigned to each information sample in the training set is modified based on the base hypothesis predictions.