Patents by Inventor Ronald D. Finlayson
Ronald D. Finlayson has filed for patents to protect the following inventions. This listing includes patent applications that are pending as well as patents that have already been granted by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO).
-
Patent number: 9189757Abstract: A System to Maintain Balance of Factory Quality Attributes with Software Factory Operating Environment provides the means to determine if a deliverable will meet the needs of a client's project. The process includes the identification and measurement of different parameters of a software factory, including specified architectural features, and compares these parameters with the factory's strategic artifacts and client's critical project needs to qualify attributes within the software factory environment. This process provides a means to monitor and maintain an optimal balance of desirable quality attributes. Thus, quality attributes are analyzed before design time and before delivery of a software product, such that an analysis can be performed before any considerable amount of time and efforts have been spent on a project.Type: GrantFiled: August 23, 2007Date of Patent: November 17, 2015Assignee: International Business Machines CorporationInventors: Ronald D. Finlayson, Naomi M. Mitsumori, Francis X. Reddington
-
Patent number: 8898619Abstract: A computer-implemented method, system, and computer-readable medium for determining if a software factory is ready to take on a software project is presented. In a preferred embodiment, the computer-implemented method includes the steps of: determining if an infrastructure for a software factory has been procured; determining if operational software needed to assemble work packets in an assembly line in the software factory has been installed; determining if a workflow event model for an assembly line in the software factory has been configured; determining if workload in the assembly line has been balanced; determining if communication channels between the software factory and a customer's computer system have been defined and cleared for data transmission; and in response to determining that any element described above has been determined not to have occurred, prohibiting an induction of a software project into the software factory.Type: GrantFiled: September 14, 2012Date of Patent: November 25, 2014Assignee: International Business Machines CorporationInventors: Jarir K. Chaar, Ronald D. Finlayson, Thomas A. Jobson, Jr., Naomi M. Mitsumori, Francis X. Reddington
-
Patent number: 8863073Abstract: A method, system, and computer-readable medium for maintaining a health of a software factory that creates custom software in a standardized manner is presented. In a preferred embodiment, the method includes the steps of: defining work packets to perform sub-functions of a custom software; tracking a transmission of the work packets to an assembly line in a software factory; monitoring any retrieval of software artifacts that are used to create the work packets; monitoring any on-going changes of work activities that are contained in the work packets; determining if execution of the work packets conforms to governance guidelines for the software factory; monitoring the software factory to ensure that the work packets comply with an architecture of the software factory; tracking quality metrics for an execution of the work packets in an assembly line in the software factory; and transmitting all tracked and monitored information to a dashboard.Type: GrantFiled: November 19, 2012Date of Patent: October 14, 2014Assignee: International Business Machines CorporationInventors: Jarir K. Chaar, Ronald D. Finlayson, Thomas A. Jobson, Jr., Naomi M. Mitsumori
-
Patent number: 8566777Abstract: A method, system, and computer-readable medium for predicatively selecting which work packets will be needed by a software factory to create a deliverable custom software are presented. In a preferred embodiment, the computer-implemented method includes: presenting an initial checklist that consists of a series of question groups; receiving answers to the initial checklist; in response to determining that received answers to the initial checklist indicate that a new series of questions is required to predict which work packets will be needed to create the deliverable custom software, dynamically generating a new checklist; evaluating leading indicators for the received answers; based on relevancy of answers and the leading indicators, eliminating irrelevant questions from the new checklist; and based on answers to remaining relevant questions, determining if a particular work packet will be needed to create the deliverable custom software in the software factory.Type: GrantFiled: April 13, 2007Date of Patent: October 22, 2013Assignee: International Business Machines CorporationInventors: Jarir K. Chaar, Ronald D. Finlayson, Thomas A. Jobson, Jr., Naomi M. Mitsumori, Francis X. Reddington
-
Patent number: 8539437Abstract: Security for a software factory is provided by detecting a request by a user to utilize the software factory. Upon being authenticated, the user is granted permission to access specific areas of the software factory. A log is created of locations in software factory that have been accessed by the user. This log is then utilized in an audit that describes how effective the software factory is in creating deliverable software.Type: GrantFiled: August 30, 2007Date of Patent: September 17, 2013Assignee: International Business Machines CorporationInventors: Ronald D. Finlayson, Naomi M. Mitsumori, Francis X. Reddington
-
Patent number: 8464205Abstract: A method, system, and computer-readable medium for managing a work packet's life cycle, wherein the work packet is assembled in a software factory that creates custom software in a standardized manner, are presented. In a preferred embodiment, the computer-implemented method comprises the steps of: defining a work packet to perform a sub-function of a custom software, wherein the work packet is a pre-stored, reusable, self-contained, discrete unit of software code; assembling the work packet; archiving the work packet in an asset repository; retrieving the work packet from the asset repository; and sending the work packet to an assembly line for consolidation with other work packets to create a custom software.Type: GrantFiled: April 13, 2007Date of Patent: June 11, 2013Assignee: International Business Machines CorporationInventors: Jarir K. Chaar, Ronald D. Finlayson, Thomas A. Jobson, Jr., Naomi M. Mitsumori, Francis X. Reddington
-
Patent number: 8359566Abstract: A method, system and computer-readable medium for creating software in a standardized manner are presented. The method includes the steps of: receiving, at a software factory, a description of software needs from a customer; creating, in the software factory, a project proposal that meets performance criteria found in the description of software needs; inducting the project proposal into the software factory, where inducting the project proposal initially evaluates the project proposal's compatibility with a capacity of the software factory; parsing the project proposal into major functional areas; retrieving work packets that are appropriate for the project proposal, where the work packets are pre-stored, reusable, self-contained, discrete units of software code; assembling the work packets into a deliverable software; testing the deliverable software; and delivering the deliverable software to the customer.Type: GrantFiled: April 13, 2007Date of Patent: January 22, 2013Assignee: International Business Machines CorporationInventors: Jarir K. Chaar, Ronald D. Finlayson, Juan P. Giraldo, Steven R. Lang, Naomi M. Mitsumori, Hari Rajagopal, Francis X. Reddington, Terri A. Vines
-
Publication number: 20130014079Abstract: A computer-implemented method, system, and computer-readable medium for determining if a software factory is ready to take on a software project is presented. In a preferred embodiment, the computer-implemented method includes the steps of: determining if an infrastructure for a software factory has been procured; determining if operational software needed to assemble work packets in an assembly line in the software factory has been installed; determining if a workflow event model for an assembly line in the software factory has been configured; determining if workload in the assembly line has been balanced; determining if communication channels between the software factory and a customer's computer system have been defined and cleared for data transmission; and in response to determining that any element described above has been determined not to have occurred, prohibiting an induction of a software project into the software factory.Type: ApplicationFiled: September 14, 2012Publication date: January 10, 2013Applicant: INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATIONInventors: JARIR K. CHAAR, RONALD D. FINLAYSON, THOMAS A. JOBSON, JR., NAOMI M. MITSUMORI, FRANCIS X. REDDINGTON
-
Patent number: 8332807Abstract: Within the context of a software factory, process sensors detect time consuming activities that extend beyond an estimated predetermined completion timeline for a project. These process sensors also detect wait states that are caused by processes and activities of tasks that are not critical to completing the project. A process analysis is used to determine if defined added value processes and activities identified in a value stream analysis are interdependent to a critical path for executing the project. If the defined added value processes and activities identified in the value stream analysis are determined to not be interdependent to the critical path for executing the project, then a determination is made that performance of the defined added value processes and activities identified in the value stream analysis is wasteful and such processes and activities are eliminated from the process.Type: GrantFiled: August 10, 2007Date of Patent: December 11, 2012Assignee: International Business Machines CorporationInventors: Ronald D. Finlayson, Naomi M. Mitsumori, Francis X. Reddington
-
Patent number: 8327318Abstract: A method, system, and computer-readable medium for maintaining a health of a software factory that creates custom software in a standardized manner is presented. In a preferred embodiment, the method includes the steps of: defining work packets to perform sub-functions of a custom software; tracking a transmission of the work packets to an assembly line in a software factory; monitoring any retrieval of software artifacts that are used to create the work packets; monitoring any on-going changes of work activities that are contained in the work packets; determining if execution of the work packets conforms to governance guidelines for the software factory; monitoring the software factory to ensure that the work packets comply with an architecture of the software factory; tracking quality metrics for an execution of the work packets in an assembly line in the software factory; and transmitting all tracked and monitored information described above to a dashboard.Type: GrantFiled: April 13, 2007Date of Patent: December 4, 2012Assignee: International Business Machines CorporationInventors: Jarir K. Chaar, Ronald D. Finlayson, Thomas A. Jobson, Jr., Naomi M. Mitsumori, Francis X. Reddington
-
Patent number: 8296719Abstract: A computer-implemented method, system, and computer-readable medium for determining if a software factory is ready to take on a software project is presented. In a preferred embodiment, the computer-implemented method includes the steps of: receiving a software project proposal including a custom software description describing a specific project type of the software project; determining, by a computer processor, that the software project proposal is qualified for acceptance by a software factory, utilizing a scorecard for the specific project type, wherein the scorecard provides a maturity assessment of resources required and identifies any potential choke-points for the specific project type; and in response to a determination that the software project proposal is qualified for acceptance by the software factory, the software factory undertaking the software project proposal.Type: GrantFiled: April 13, 2007Date of Patent: October 23, 2012Assignee: International Business Machines CorporationInventors: Jarir K. Chaar, Ronald D. Finlayson, Thomas A. Jobson, Jr., Naomi M. Mitsumori, Francis X. Reddington
-
Patent number: 8141030Abstract: A system decision engine enables a software factory to effectively handle intelligent load balancing and distribution to workers on a software assembly line through the use of pre-configured rules. The pre-configured rules are based on a projected availability of workers based on past traffic analysis of work packets being sent to particular workers on the software assembly line.Type: GrantFiled: August 7, 2007Date of Patent: March 20, 2012Assignee: International Business Machines CorporationInventors: Ronald D. Finlayson, Naomi M. Mitsumori, Francis X. Reddington
-
Patent number: 8141040Abstract: A method, system, and computer-readable medium for assembling work packets within a software factory are presented. In a preferred embodiment, the computer-implemented method comprises the steps of: collecting a plurality of software artifacts that have been archived during an assembly of previous work packets; collecting a plurality of metrics that have been utilized during the assembly of previous work packets; defining a template for a new work packet, wherein the template for the new work packet is created by a packet definition process that defines attributes that are needed in the new work packet; selecting requisite software artifacts from the plurality of software artifacts; selecting requisite metrics from the plurality of metrics; and sending the template, requisite software artifacts and requisite metrics to a packet assembly process, wherein the packet assembly process assembles the requisite software artifacts to create the new work packet.Type: GrantFiled: April 13, 2007Date of Patent: March 20, 2012Assignee: International Business Machines CorporationInventors: Jarir K. Chaar, Ronald D. Finlayson, Thomas A. Jobson, Jr., Naomi M. Mitsumori, Francis X. Reddington
-
Patent number: 7958494Abstract: A method, system, and computer-readable medium for rapid on-boarding of a software factory are presented. In a preferred embodiment, the computer-implemented method comprises the steps of: identifying choke-points in a first software project; creating a checklist of identifying factors that caused the choke-points that were identified in the first software project; receiving a new software project at a software factory, wherein the new software project is in a same software category as the first software project; presenting the checklist for the first software project; receiving new answers to the checklist; determining if the software factory is ready to handle the new software project based on the new answers to the checklist; and in response to determining that the software factory is ready to handle the new software project, configuring the software factory in a same configuration as that previously used by the first software project.Type: GrantFiled: April 13, 2007Date of Patent: June 7, 2011Assignee: International Business Machines CorporationInventors: Jarir K. Chaar, Ronald D. Finlayson, Thomas A. Jobson, Jr., Naomi M. Mitsumori, Francis X. Reddington
-
Publication number: 20090064322Abstract: Security for a software factory is provided by detecting a request by a user to utilize the software factory. Upon being authenticated, the user is granted permission to access specific areas of the software factory. A log is created of locations in software factory that have been accessed by the user. This log is then utilized in an audit that describes how effective the software factory is in creating deliverable software.Type: ApplicationFiled: August 30, 2007Publication date: March 5, 2009Inventors: Ronald D. Finlayson, Naomi M. Mitsumori, Francis X. Reddington
-
Publication number: 20090055795Abstract: A System to Maintain Balance of Factory Quality Attributes with Software Factory Operating Environment provides the means to determine if a deliverable will meet the needs of a client's project. The process includes the identification and measurement of different parameters of a software factory, including specified architectural features, and compares these parameters with the factory's strategic artifacts and client's critical project needs to qualify attributes within the software factory environment. This process provides a means to monitor and maintain an optimal balance of desirable quality attributes. Thus, quality attributes are analyzed before design time and before delivery of a software product, such that an analysis can be performed before any considerable amount of time and efforts have been spent on a project.Type: ApplicationFiled: August 23, 2007Publication date: February 26, 2009Inventors: Ronald D. Finlayson, Naomi M. Mitsumori, Francis X. Reddington
-
Publication number: 20090043631Abstract: A system decision engine enables a software factory to effectively handle intelligent load balancing and distribution to workers on a software assembly line through the use of pre-configured rules. The pre-configured rules are based on a projected availability of workers based on past traffic analysis of work packets being sent to particular workers on the software assembly line.Type: ApplicationFiled: August 7, 2007Publication date: February 12, 2009Inventors: Ronald D. Finlayson, Naomi M. Mitsumori, Francis X. Reddington
-
Publication number: 20090043622Abstract: Within the context of a software factory, process sensors detect time consuming activities that extend beyond an estimated predetermined completion timeline for a project. These process sensors also detect wait states that are caused by processes and activities of tasks that are not critical to completing the project. A process analysis is used to determine if defined added value processes and activities identified in a value stream analysis are interdependent to a critical path for executing the project. If the defined added value processes and activities identified in the value stream analysis are determined to not be interdependent to the critical path for executing the project, then a determination is made that performance of the defined added value processes and activities identified in the value stream analysis is wasteful and such processes and activities are eliminated from the process.Type: ApplicationFiled: August 10, 2007Publication date: February 12, 2009Inventors: Ronald D. Finlayson, Naomi M. Mitsumori, Francis X. Reddington
-
Publication number: 20080256529Abstract: A method, system, and computer-readable medium for predicatively selecting which work packets will be needed by a software factory to create a deliverable custom software are presented. In a preferred embodiment, the computer-implemented method includes: presenting an initial checklist that consists of a series of question groups; receiving answers to the initial checklist; in response to determining that received answers to the initial checklist indicate that a new series of questions is required to predict which work packets will be needed to create the deliverable custom software, dynamically generating a new checklist; evaluating leading indicators for the received answers; based on relevancy of answers and the leading indicators, eliminating irrelevant questions from the new checklist; and based on answers to remaining relevant questions, determining if a particular work packet will be needed to create the deliverable custom software in the software factory.Type: ApplicationFiled: April 13, 2007Publication date: October 16, 2008Inventors: Jarir K. Chaar, Ronald D. Finlayson, Thomas A. Jobson, Naomi M. Mitsumori, Francis X. Reddington
-
Publication number: 20080255693Abstract: A computer-implemented method, system, and computer-readable medium for determining if a software factory is ready to take on a software project is presented. In a preferred embodiment, the computer-implemented method includes the steps of: determining if an infrastructure for a software factory has been procured; determining if operational software needed to assemble work packets in an assembly line in the software factory has been installed; determining if a workflow event model for an assembly line in the software factory has been configured; determining if workload in the assembly line has been balanced; determining if communication channels between the software factory and a customer's computer system have been defined and cleared for data transmission; and in response to determining that any element described above has been determined not to have occurred, prohibiting an induction of a software project into the software factory.Type: ApplicationFiled: April 13, 2007Publication date: October 16, 2008Inventors: Jarir K. Chaar, Ronald D. Finlayson, Thomas A. Jobson, Naomi M. Mitsumori, Francis X. Reddington