Abstract: In various examples, a hazard detection system plots hazard indicators from multiple detection sensors to grid cells of an occupancy grid corresponding to a driving environment. For example, as the ego-machine travels along a roadway, one or more sensors of the ego-machine may capture sensor data representing the driving environment. A system of the ego-machine may then analyze the sensor data to determine the existence and/or location of the one or more hazards within an occupancy grid—and thus within the environment. When a hazard is detected using a respective sensor, the system may plot an indicator of the hazard to one or more grid cells that correspond to the detected location of the hazard. Based, at least in part, on a fused or combined confidence of the hazard indicators for each grid cell, the system may predict whether the corresponding grid cell is occupied by a hazard.

Abstract: In various examples, a hazard detection system fuses outputs from multiple sensors over time to determine a probability that a stationary object or hazard exists at a location. The system may then use sensor data to calculate a detection bounding shape for detected objects and, using the bounding shape, may generate a set of particles, each including a confidence value that an object exists at a corresponding location. The system may then capture additional sensor data by one or more sensors of the ego-machine that are different from those used to capture the first sensor data. To improve the accuracy of the confidences of the particles, the system may determine a correspondence between the first sensor data and the additional sensor data (e.g., depth sensor data), which may be used to filter out a portion of the particles and improve the depth predictions corresponding to the object.