Abstract: A hosting provider may be bi-directionally authenticated with one or more media repositories. The hosting provider preferably has domain name registration and hosting capabilities. The media repositories may collect data (such as pictures and/or files) from one or more users. Once authenticated, the hosting provider and media repositories may cooperate in storing, aggregating and transmitting data to a user. Routes may be hosted by the hosting provider and used to organize and access the data. For example, a user may enter a route into a browser and receive media/data, possibly from a plurality of media repositories, that is associated with that route. In another example, the user may enter a route into the browser and be redirected from the hosting provider to a website of the media repository.

Abstract: A hosting provider may be bi-directionally authenticated with one or more media repositories. The hosting provider preferably has domain name registration and hosting capabilities. The media repositories may collect data (such as pictures and/or files) from one or more users. Once authenticated, the hosting provider and media repositories may cooperate in storing, aggregating and transmitting data to a user. Routes may be hosted by the hosting provider and used to organize and access the data. For example, a user may enter a route into a browser and receive media/data, possibly from a plurality of media repositories, that is associated with that route. In another example, the user may enter a route into the browser and be redirected from the hosting provider to a website of the media repository.

Abstract: A hosting provider may be bi-directionally authenticated with one or more media repositories. The hosting provider preferably has domain name registration and hosting capabilities. The media repositories may collect data (such as pictures and/or files) from one or more users. Once authenticated, the hosting provider and media repositories may cooperate in storing, aggregating and transmitting data to a user. Routes may be hosted by the hosting provider and used to organize and access the data. For example, a user may enter a route into a browser and receive media/data, possibly from a plurality of media repositories, that is associated with that route. In another example, the user may enter a route into the browser and be redirected from the hosting provider to a website of the media repository.

Abstract: A hosting provider may be bi-directionally authenticated with one or more media repositories. The hosting provider preferably has domain name registration and hosting capabilities. The media repositories may collect data (such as pictures and/or files) from one or more users. Once authenticated, the hosting provider and media repositories may cooperate in storing, aggregating and transmitting data to a user. Routes may be hosted by the hosting provider and used to organize and access the data. For example, a user may enter a route into a browser and receive media/data, possibly from a plurality of media repositories, that is associated with that route. In another example, the user may enter a route into the browser and be redirected from the hosting provider to a website of the media repository.

Abstract: A hosting provider may be bi-directionally authenticated with one or more media repositories. The hosting provider preferably has domain name registration and hosting capabilities. The media repositories may collect data (such as pictures and/or files) from one or more users. Once authenticated, the hosting provider and media repositories may cooperate in storing, aggregating and transmitting data to a user. Routes may be hosted by the hosting provider and used to organize and access the data. For example, a user may enter a route into a browser and receive media/data, possibly from a plurality of media repositories, that is associated with that route. In another example, the user may enter a route into the browser and be redirected from the hosting provider to a website of the media repository.

Abstract: A static type, called “dynamic”, is introduced into a statically bound programming language. An expression or subexpression that is defined as a static type called “dynamic” in the source code of a program written in the statically bound programming language, is bound based on its runtime type instead of on its compile time type. Binding can be performed based on a mixture of compile time and runtime types that are based on the specification of types of expressions in source code. This type of binding is called hybrid binding. Operations are bound using the runtime type of constituent expressions (i.e., the runtime type of a receiver, an argument, or an operand) typed as dynamic and the compile time type of static constituents. If any constituent expression of an operation is dynamic, binding occurs at runtime instead of at compile time.

Abstract: User assemblies can be created by a compiler that can handle more than one type definition during execution. Local copies are created for respective authoritative types in a code library, and the local copies are marked with a local type identifier. An authoritative type identifier (e.g., a globally unique identifier (GUID)) is copied from the authoritative type to the local type, and functions and properties associated with the local type are also copied from the authoritative type. Authoritative types are resolved for requested types when a local assembly references a local type from a compiled user assembly. The local type can be identified by a local type identifier, and an authoritative type can be retrieved from the code library that has a same authoritative type identifier as the requested type. A local copy of the retrieved authoritative type can be copied to the local assembly under compilation. The compiler can then emit user assemblies that comprise merely local types.

Abstract: A static type, called “dynamic”, is introduced into a statically bound programming language. An expression or subexpression that is defined as a static type called “dynamic” in the source code of a program written in the statically bound programming language, is bound based on its runtime type instead of on its compile time type. Binding can be performed based on a mixture of compile time and runtime types that are based on the specification of types of expressions in source code. This type of binding is called hybrid binding. Operations are bound using the runtime type of constituent expressions (i.e., the runtime type of a receiver, an argument, or an operand) typed as dynamic and the compile time type of static constituents. If any constituent expression of an operation is dynamic, binding occurs at runtime instead of at compile time.

Abstract: User assemblies can be created by a compiler that can handle more than one type definition during execution. Local copies are created for respective authoritative types in a code library, and the local copies are marked with a local type identifier. An authoritative type identifier (e.g., a globally unique identifier (GUID)) is copied from the authoritative type to the local type, and functions and properties associated with the local type are also copied from the authoritative type. Authoritative types are resolved for requested types when a local assembly references a local type from a compiled user assembly. The local type can be identified by a local type identifier, and an authoritative type can be retrieved from the code library that has a same authoritative type identifier as the requested type. A local copy of the retrieved authoritative type can be copied to the local assembly under compilation. The compiler can then emit user assemblies that comprise merely local types.

Abstract: Expression tree versatility and applicability are enhanced to facilitate programming across various program languages and execution contexts. An expression tree can represent programmatic code as data in a representation common to multiple process mechanisms. As a result, entire programs or portions thereof can be captured and processed by a numerous common language components. Further, language specific concepts can be reduced to the common representation to enable language independent employment.