Abstract: A framework, such as for automated testing for telecommunications software and resources is disclosed that reuses code modules, thereby reducing redundancy and increasing efficiency and productivity. The zero coding automation system disclosed herein provides an end-to-end automation framework, which minimizes (and in some cases eliminates) the requirement to write software code, e.g. to test software modules. Instead, the coding automation systems and methods provide a hierarchical framework to translate requests (e.g. testing commands, statements, and so on) received in a natural language (for example, English) to testing code modules written in, for example, one or more programming languages (for example, tool specific Application Program Interface (API)/libraries developed to test functionality).

Abstract: A framework, such as for automated testing for telecommunications software and resources is disclosed that reuses code modules, thereby reducing redundancy and increasing efficiency and productivity. The zero coding automation system disclosed herein provides an end-to-end automation framework, which minimizes (and in some cases eliminates) the requirement to write software code, e.g. to test software modules. Instead, the coding automation systems and methods provide a hierarchical framework to translate requests (e.g. testing commands, statements, and so on) received in a natural language (for example, English) to testing code modules written in, for example, one or more programming languages (for example, tool specific Application Program Interface (API)/libraries developed to test functionality).

Abstract: A framework for automated testing for use in testing telecommunications software and resources is disclosed that reuses testing code modules, thereby reducing redundancy and increasing efficiency and productivity. The zero coding automation system disclosed herein provides an end-to-end testing automation framework, which minimizes (and in some cases eliminates) the requirement for testers to write software code to test software modules. Instead, the coding automation systems and methods provide a hierarchical framework to translate testing requests (commands, statements, and so on) received in a natural language (for example, English) to testing code modules written in, for example, one or more programming languages (for example, tool specific Application Program Interface (API)/libraries developed to test functionality).

Abstract: A framework for automated testing for use in testing telecommunications software and resources is disclosed that reuses testing code modules, thereby reducing redundancy and increasing efficiency and productivity. The zero coding automation system disclosed herein provides an end-to-end testing automation framework, which minimizes (and in some cases eliminates) the requirement for testers to write software code to test software modules. Instead, the coding automation systems and methods provide a hierarchical framework to translate testing requests (commands, statements, and so on) received in a natural language (for example, English) to testing code modules written in, for example, one or more programming languages (for example, tool specific Application Program Interface (API)/libraries developed to test functionality).

Abstract: Systems and processes may be implemented to revalidate carryover functionalities of a telecommunication device operating system (OS) with respect to updated telecommunication network architectures. Legacy test protocols may be generated based on an initial validation of a functionality prior to releasing an OS. Subsequently, the legacy test protocols may be executed for revalidation of the functionality when later carried over into a later version of the OS. The legacy test protocols may also be executed in response to telecommunication network hardware updates to validate existing functionalities with respect to new hardware components or technology. The later version of the OS may be analyzed to identify carryover functionalities and the identified carryover functionalities may ranked according to importance of being revalidated.

Abstract: Systems and processes may be implemented to revalidate carryover functionalities of a telecommunication device operating system (OS) with respect to updated telecommunication network architectures. Legacy test protocols may be generated based on an initial validation of a functionality prior to releasing an OS. Subsequently, the legacy test protocols may be executed for revalidation of the functionality when later carried over into a later version of the OS. The legacy test protocols may also be executed in response to telecommunication network hardware updates to validate existing functionalities with respect to new hardware components or technology. The later version of the OS may be analyzed to identify carryover functionalities and the identified carryover functionalities may ranked according to importance of being revalidated.