Abstract: A system for assessing a data model includes a data receiver, a model receiver, and a model assessment device. The data receiver receives training data, historical data, and production data. The model receiver receives the data model associated with the historical data and trained using the training data. The historical data includes a first outcome of the data model provided based on an input feature in the production data. The model assessment device identifies a key feature in the production data relative to the input feature based on a target category in the historical data and a statistical distribution of the input feature in the production data. The model assessment device determines a second outcome of the data model based on the key feature. In response to the second outcome being different from the first outcome, the model assessment device determines a veracity score for assessing the data model.

Abstract: Examples for enhancing veracity of data are described herein. Data from a repository may be received based on a data receiving rule. From the received data, a first dataset may be generated using statistical modeling. Also, a first data veracity score for the first dataset is generated which is indicative of a degree of usability of the dataset. Another aspect relates to identifying an anomaly in the first dataset, the corrector, for each anomaly, to identify a correction technique from amongst a plurality of correction techniques. Further, a second dataset is generated using the identified correction technique having second data veracity score higher than the first data veracity score.

Abstract: Examples for enhancing veracity of data are described herein. Data from a repository may be received based on a data receiving rule. From the received data, a first dataset may be generated using statistical modeling. Also, a first data veracity score for the first dataset is generated which is indicative of a degree of usability of the dataset. Another aspect relates to identifying an anomaly in the first dataset, the corrector, for each anomaly, to identify a correction technique from amongst a plurality of correction techniques. Further, a second dataset is generated using the identified correction technique having second data veracity score higher than the first data veracity score.

Abstract: A system for assessing a data model includes a data receiver, a model receiver, and a model assessment device. The data receiver receives training data, historical data, and production data. The model receiver receives the data model associated with the historical data and trained using the training data. The historical data includes a first outcome of the data model provided based on an input feature in the production data. The model assessment device identifies a key feature in the production data relative to the input feature based on a target category in the historical data and a statistical distribution of the input feature in the production data. The model assessment device determines a second outcome of the data model based on the key feature. In response to the second outcome being different from the first outcome, the model assessment device determines a veracity score for assessing the data model.

Abstract: A system uses GPS or other location determining features and existing cellular services, along with a centrally available computer program. A vendor/advertiser can discover nearby consumers; the vendor/advertiser can publish a business communication such as promotion so that the consumer can discover the business announcements; the vendor/advertiser can send a one-on-one message to the consumer detailing the business announcement and call for action; and the consumer can obtain from the vendor/advertiser any clarifications, questions, feedback etc. regarding product/promotion. Individual users can use the system to identify and send messages to other individuals based on location.