Abstract: The ultrasonic testing device for weld seams (28) in pipes, sheets and containers, preferably for circumferential welds in pipelines, is fitted with two identical test head supports (20), each fitted with at least one test head (e.g., 23), arranged in lateral inversion to the weld seam, which acoustically irradiate from the basic material (30) of the pipes or sheets laterally into the weld seam (28) and are coupled to the surface of the basic material (30) opposite the root (32) of the weld seam (28).

Abstract: An ultrasonic measuring process is disclosed for measuring the wall thickness variation in the region of the welding seam of a pipe. At least two testing heads are each acoustically coupled to the pipe by a water jet. The acoustic entry zones of the testing heads are moved together in relation to the pipe, parallel to the axis of the pipe. At least one of the testing heads is moved back and forth across the axis of the tube, crossing over the welding seam. The acoustic entry zone can be moved by modulation of a phased array. The second testing head either emits acoustic radiation into the pipe always outside the welding seam or also crosses the welding seam, but at different times than the first testing head. The signals of both testing heads are processed in a measurement value processing circuit such that simultaneously occurring measurement value deviations supply no output signal.

Abstract: Plate stock of uneven and variable thickness is tested for defects by means of ultrasonics whereby the zone adjacent the front surface and up to a depth of the minimum plate thickness is detected conventionally, but under utilization of a novel method the zone of variable thickness adjacent the rear wall is tested by detecting any echo in a gating period (15) that is returned from that zone or from the rear wall, and such an echo is used to set up a supplemental gating period during which either none or the rear wall echo will occur and in the latter case the setting up of the supplemental gating period is interpreted as having resulted from the presence of a defect (for example, echo 12) so that the occurrence of the rear wall echo 9 within the supplemental gating period is registered as an indication of a defect.