Abstract: OP logs are utilized for fast recovery of synchronous replication in a storage system. According to one embodiment, a computer-implemented method comprises establishing synchronous replication between one or more storage objects of a first consistency group (CG1) of a primary storage site and one or more storage objects of a second consistency group (CG2) of a secondary storage site, initiating a peer health check to determine a health condition of the primary storage site and concurrently initiating a create snapshot process to create a snapshot of one or more storage objects of the CG2 of the secondary storage site in response to detection of missing heartbeat communications from the primary storage site, and performing inflight tracking replay and reconciliation between a first Op log of the primary storage site and a second Op log of the secondary storage site when an out of sync state or failover occurs.

Abstract: According to an example, a computer-implemented method comprises initiating a first process for atomically setting the primary bias state with a first node of a primary storage cluster of a multi-site distributed storage system due to a temporary loss of connectivity to a mediator or a temporary mediator failure, releasing an atomic lock for the first process on the first node of the primary storage cluster, sending the first process and an associated first generation indicator to a first node of a secondary storage cluster of the multi-site distributed storage system to handle the first process for setting the primary bias state, and initiating a second process for atomically clearing a primary bias state with the first node or any node of the primary storage cluster based on detecting a connection to the mediator or detecting that the mediator is available.

Abstract: A computer implemented method includes maintaining information indicative of whether a data replication relationship between a dataset associated with the local CG (CG1) and a mirror copy of the dataset stored on a remote CG (CG2) of a remote distributed storage system is in an in-synchronization (InSync) state or an out-of-synchronization (OOS) state, determining whether a CG storage expansion process is in progress, and in response to determining the OOS state and whether the primary storage site has a failure, initiating an automatic unplanned failover (AUFO) workflow without manual intervention on the original volumes in the CG1 of a first storage cluster of the primary storage site and the original volumes in the CG2 of a second storage cluster when the CG storage expansion process is in progress with a new source volume to be a member of CG1 and a new destination volume to be a member of CG2.

Abstract: In one example, the present storage solution provides an order of operations of a computer-implemented method that includes establishing bi-directional synchronous replication between one or more members of a first consistency group (CG1) of a primary storage site and one or more members of a second consistency group (CG2) of a secondary storage site with each storage site having read/write access while maintaining zero recovery point objective (RPO) and Zero recovery time objective (RTO). The method includes initiating a non-disruptive planned failover to change a role for the secondary storage site and change a role for the primary storage site while maintaining in sync status of the bi-directional synchronous replication between the one or more members of the CG1 of the primary storage site and the one or more members of the CG2 of a secondary storage site, and while maintaining zero data loss protection.

Abstract: Multi-site distributed storage systems and computer-implemented methods are described for improving a resumption time for processing of input/output (I/O) operations during an automatic unplanned failover (AUFO). A first storage cluster includes a first set of consistency groups (CGs) and a second storage cluster includes a second mirrored set of CGs. A computer-implemented method includes prefetching, with a user space of the second storage cluster, configuration information from a replicated database prior to starting the AUFO workflow, sending the configuration information to a kernel space of the second storage cluster on a per CG level while queuing the AUFO workflow, and determining if any in progress workflows conflict with the AUFO workflow.

Abstract: According to an example, a computer-implemented method comprises initiating a first process for atomically setting the primary bias state with a first node of a primary storage cluster of a multi-site distributed storage system due to a temporary loss of connectivity to a mediator or a temporary mediator failure, releasing an atomic lock for the first process on the first node of the primary storage cluster, sending the first process and an associated first generation indicator to a first node of a secondary storage cluster of the multi-site distributed storage system to handle the first process for setting the primary bias state, and initiating a second process for atomically clearing a primary bias state with the first node or any node of the primary storage cluster based on detecting a connection to the mediator or detecting that the mediator is available.

Abstract: A computer-implemented method includes establishing bi-directional synchronous replication between one or more members of a first consistency group (CG1) of a primary storage site and one or more members of a second consistency group (CG2) of a secondary storage site with each storage site having read/write access. The method includes detecting a disruption in a data replication session from one or more members of the CG1 to one or more members of the CG2 due to a disaster event, initiating a consensus establishment request to be sent to a mediator agent of the primary storage site, rejecting with the mediator agent the consensus establishment request, and initiating a role flip process for primary and secondary roles in serving I/O Operations in response to the rejection of the consensus establishment request to reduce an application input/output (I/O) resumption time due to the disaster event.

Abstract: Systems and methods include negotiating a primary bias state for primary and secondary storage sites when a mediator is temporarily unavailable for a multi-site distributed storage system. In one example, a computer-implemented method comprises detecting, with the primary storage site having a primary storage cluster, a temporary loss of connectivity to a mediator or a failure of the mediator. The computer-implemented method includes negotiating the primary bias state and setting the primary bias state on a secondary storage cluster of the secondary storage site when the secondary storage cluster detects a temporary loss of connectivity to the mediator, determining whether the primary storage cluster receives a confirmation of the secondary storage cluster setting the primary bias state, and setting the primary bias state on the primary storage cluster when the primary storage cluster receives the confirmation.

Abstract: Systems and methods include negotiating a primary bias state for primary and secondary storage sites when a mediator is temporarily unavailable for a multi-site distributed storage system. In one example, a computer-implemented method comprises detecting, with the primary storage site having a primary storage cluster, a temporary loss of connectivity to a mediator or a failure of the mediator. The computer-implemented method includes negotiating the primary bias state and setting the primary bias state on a secondary storage cluster of the secondary storage site when the secondary storage cluster detects a temporary loss of connectivity to the mediator, determining whether the primary storage cluster receives a confirmation of the secondary storage cluster setting the primary bias state, and setting the primary bias state on the primary storage cluster when the primary storage cluster receives the confirmation.

Abstract: Systems and methods include negotiating a primary bias state for primary and secondary storage sites for a mediator-less deployment. In one example, a computer-implemented method comprises detecting whether an active synchronous replication relationship is created for bi-directional synchronous replication between a first consistency group (CG1) of one or more storage members of the primary storage site and a second consistency group (CG2) of one or more storage members of the secondary storage site when a mediator is not configured for a mediator-less deployment or whether an existing mediator is being unconfigured with the mediator located remotely from the primary storage site and remotely from the secondary storage site, and negotiating a primary bias state and setting the primary bias state on a secondary storage cluster of the secondary storage site upon the active synchronous replication relationship being created with no configured mediator or when the existing mediator is unconfigured.

Abstract: A computer-implemented method comprises transitioning from a unidirectional asynchronous replication to initiating bi-directional synchronous replication between one or more storage objects of a first consistency group (CG1) of a primary storage site and one or more storage objects of a second consistency group (CG2) of a secondary storage site, converting the one or more storage objects of the CG2 from data protection read only access to read write access, and performing a reverse synchronization process between the one or more storage objects of the CG2 and the one or more storage objects of the CG1 including instantiating a reverse splitter on each volume of CG2, establishing reverse sync replication sessions for each storage object of the CG2, and allowing input output (IO) access to the one or more storage objects of the CG2.

Abstract: Systems and methods are described for efficiently processing events related to a relationship between a primary copy of data at a primary storage system and a mirror copy of the data at a cross-site secondary storage system of a multi-site distributed storage system. According to an example, a mediator agent that is configured on both primary and secondary storage systems provides coordination and serialization for various events generated in the relationship. The multi-site distributed storage system performs actions based on the event processing such as performing a failover operation from the primary storage system to the secondary storage system or resynchronizing the relationship to ensure application protection and availability.

Abstract: A computer implemented method includes maintaining information indicative of whether a data replication relationship between a dataset associated with the local CG (CG1) and a mirror copy of the dataset stored on a remote CG (CG2) of a remote distributed storage system is in an in-synchronization (InSync) state or an out-of-synchronization (OOS) state, determining whether a CG storage expansion process is in progress, and in response to determining the OOS state and whether the primary storage site has a failure, initiating an automatic unplanned failover (AUFO) workflow without manual intervention on the original volumes in the CG1 of a first storage cluster of the primary storage site and the original volumes in the CG2 of a second storage cluster when the CG storage expansion process is in progress with a new source volume to be a member of CG1 and a new destination volume to be a member of CG2.

Abstract: A computer implemented method includes maintaining information indicative of whether a data replication relationship between a dataset associated with the local CG and a mirror copy of the dataset stored on a remote CG of a remote distributed storage system is in an in-synchronization (InSync) state or an out-of-synchronization (OOS) state, initiating a storage expansion process including a source expansion to create a new source volume as a member of the local CG and a destination expansion to create a new destination volume as a member of the remote CG, and initiating a data replication relationship expand to establish a data replication relationship for the new source volume and the new destination volume.

Abstract: Multi-site distributed storage systems and computer-implemented methods are described for providing common snapshot retention and automatic fanout reconfiguration for an asynchronous leg after a failure event that causes a failover from a primary storage site to a secondary storage site. A computer-implemented method comprises providing an asynchronous replication relationship with an asynchronous update schedule from one or more storage objects of the first storage node to one or more replicated storage objects of the third storage node, creating a snapshot copy of the one or more storage objects of the first storage node, transferring the snapshot copy to the third storage node based on an asynchronous mirror policy, and intercepting the snapshot create operation on the primary storage site and transferring the snapshot copy to the second storage node to provide a common snapshot between the second storage node and the third storage node.

Abstract: A computer-implemented method comprises providing a synchronous replication relationship from one or more storage objects of a first storage node to one or more replicated storage objects of a second storage node, providing an asynchronous replication relationship with an asynchronous update schedule from the one or more storage objects of the first storage node to one or more replicated storage objects of the third storage node to provide a protection configuration, tracking, with the third storage node of the tertiary site, a state of the secondary storage site, automatically performing a failover from the primary storage site to the secondary storage site and activating a synchronous mirror copy for the one or more replicated storage objects of the second storage node, and automatically initiating realignment and reconfiguration of the protection configuration to the tertiary storage site based upon the state of the secondary storage site.

Abstract: Multi-site distributed storage systems and computer-implemented methods are described for improving a resumption time of input/output (I/O) operations during an automatic unplanned failover (AUFO). A computer-implemented method includes determining, with a second storage cluster, whether heartbeat information from one or more storage objects of a CG of a first set of CGs is received during a time period, determining an out of sync state for a data replication relationship between the CG of the first set of CGs and a mirrored CG of a second set of CGs when the heartbeat information is not received during the time period and sending a single bulk role change call with a cluster identifier from the second cluster to an external mediator to provide a role change from follower to leader in the second set of CGs.

Abstract: Multi-site distributed storage systems and computer-implemented methods are described for providing common snapshot retention and automatic fanout reconfiguration for an asynchronous leg after a failure event that causes a failover from a primary storage site to a secondary storage site. A computer-implemented method comprises providing an asynchronous replication relationship with an asynchronous update schedule from one or more storage objects of the first storage node to one or more replicated storage objects of the third storage node, creating a snapshot copy of the one or more storage objects of the first storage node, transferring the snapshot copy to the third storage node based on an asynchronous mirror policy, and intercepting the snapshot create operation on the primary storage site and transferring the snapshot copy to the second storage node to provide a common snapshot between the second storage node and the third storage node.

Abstract: A computer-implemented method comprises providing a synchronous replication relationship from one or more storage objects of a first storage node to one or more replicated storage objects of a second storage node, providing an asynchronous replication relationship with an asynchronous update schedule from the one or more storage objects of the first storage node to one or more replicated storage objects of the third storage node to provide a protection configuration, tracking, with the third storage node of the tertiary site, a state of the secondary storage site, automatically performing a failover from the primary storage site to the secondary storage site and activating a synchronous mirror copy for the one or more replicated storage objects of the second storage node, and automatically initiating realignment and reconfiguration of the protection configuration to the tertiary storage site based upon the state of the secondary storage site.

Abstract: Multi-site distributed storage systems and computer-implemented methods are described for improving a resumption time of input/output (I/O) operations during an automatic unplanned failover (AUFO). A computer-implemented method includes determining, with a second storage cluster, whether heartbeat information from one or more storage objects of a CG of a first set of CGs is received during a time period, determining an out of sync state for a data replication relationship between the CG of the first set of CGs and a mirrored CG of a second set of CGs when the heartbeat information is not received during the time period and sending a single bulk role change call with a cluster identifier from the second cluster to an external mediator to provide a role change from follower to leader in the second set of CGs.