Patents by Inventor Stefan Horeth

Stefan Horeth has filed for patents to protect the following inventions. This listing includes patent applications that are pending as well as patents that have already been granted by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO).

  • Patent number: 7802211
    Abstract: For the verification of digital circuits, which can have multiplier structures in particular, an equivalence test between the digital circuit and a reference description of this digital circuit is proposed, in such a way that firstly for the multiplier structures implemented in the digital circuit the realized implementation alternative of several pre-defined different implementation alternatives is determined in each case and inserted into the reference description in place of the respective multiplication function, in order subsequently to execute the equivalence test with the reference description changed thereby. In this way, the structural equivalence between the reference description and the digital circuit to be verified can be substantially increased, which speeds up the verification process overall.
    Type: Grant
    Filed: August 19, 2003
    Date of Patent: September 21, 2010
    Assignee: Onespin Solutions GmbH
    Inventors: Stefan Höreth, Martin Müller-Brahms, Thomas Rudlof
  • Patent number: 7373623
    Abstract: A system and method for locating circuit deviations or circuit faults in a circuit in respect of a reference circuit. The circuit and the reference circuit are respectively describable by signal-flow graphs, the signal-flow graphs being composed of a multiplicity of interconnected function blocks. The function blocks of the circuit are first assigned to corresponding function blocks of the reference circuit. There are then ascertained those function blocks of the circuit and of the reference circuit for which assignment has not been possible, and which have disposed upstream in the signal flow at least one function block for which assignment has been possible. The result is a boundary between an assigned and a non-assigned region of the circuit and the reference circuit, respectively. A representation of the circuit and reference circuit is preferably produced in which the regions corresponding to the non-assigned function blocks are highlighted.
    Type: Grant
    Filed: July 7, 2005
    Date of Patent: May 13, 2008
    Assignee: Onespin Solutions GmbH
    Inventor: Stefan Horeth
  • Patent number: 7082586
    Abstract: The invention permits a comparison of two technical systems, which according to conventional opinion is not possible to carry out, based on a substantially simpler, technically achievable comparison, in which part systems of one or both systems are specifically replaced. The replacements are performed in a controlled manner by monitoring a replacement condition with constraints. The monitoring of the replacement condition and the generation and monitoring of the necessary constraints occur automatically. A comparison of both systems can thus be carried out based on the replacement of the part systems without introducing a loss of precision in the comparison.
    Type: Grant
    Filed: August 23, 2001
    Date of Patent: July 25, 2006
    Assignee: OneSpin Solutions, GmbH
    Inventors: Stefan Horeth, Peter Warkentin
  • Publication number: 20060101359
    Abstract: For the verification of digital circuits, which can have multiplier structures in particular, an equivalence test between the digital circuit and a reference description of this digital circuit is proposed, in such a way that firstly for the multiplier structures implemented in the digital circuit the realized implementation alternative of several pre-defined different implementation alternatives is determined in each case and inserted into the reference description in place of the respective multiplication function, in order subsequently to execute the equivalence test with the reference description changed thereby. In this way, the structural equivalence between the reference description and the digital circuit to be verified can be substantially increased, which speeds up the verification process overall.
    Type: Application
    Filed: August 19, 2003
    Publication date: May 11, 2006
    Inventors: Stefan Horeth, Martin Muller-Brahms, Thomas Rudlof
  • Publication number: 20060064655
    Abstract: A system and method for locating circuit deviations or circuit faults in a circuit in respect of a reference circuit. The circuit and the reference circuit are respectively describable by signal-flow graphs, the signal-flow graphs being composed of a multiplicity of interconnected function blocks. The function blocks of the circuit are first assigned to corresponding function blocks of the reference circuit. There are then ascertained those function blocks of the circuit and of the reference circuit for which assignment has not been possible, and which have disposed upstream in the signal flow at least one function block for which assignment has been possible. The result is a boundary between an assigned and a non-assigned region of the circuit and the reference circuit, respectively. A representation of the circuit and reference circuit is preferably produced in which the regions corresponding to the non-assigned function blocks are highlighted.
    Type: Application
    Filed: July 7, 2005
    Publication date: March 23, 2006
    Inventor: Stefan Horeth
  • Patent number: 6960930
    Abstract: In order when designing a digital circuit to be able to determine the minimum or maximum switching activity for estimating the power consumption it is determined according to the invention on the basis of a model of the digital circuit whether there is a disproving operational case, in which the switching activity is less than an estimated value (k) for the minimum switching activity or greater than an estimated value (k) for the maximum switching activity. If the existence of an appropriate disproving operational case (P(k)) can be found, when determining the maximum switching activity the estimated value (k) is increased by one step size and when determining the minimum switching activity the estimated value (k) reduces. After a decrease or increase of the estimated value (k) the process is repeated and in this way the actual value for the maximum or minimum switching activity of the digital circuit is determined iteratively.
    Type: Grant
    Filed: November 21, 2003
    Date of Patent: November 1, 2005
    Assignee: Infineon Technologies AG
    Inventor: Stefan Höreth
  • Publication number: 20040117699
    Abstract: In order when designing a digital circuit to be able to determine the minimum or maximum switching activity for estimating the power consumption it is determined according to the invention on the basis of a model of the digital circuit whether there is a disproving operational case, in which the switching activity is less than an estimated value (k) for the minimum switching activity or greater than an estimated value (k) for the maximum switching activity. If the existence of an appropriate disproving operational case (P(k)) can be found, when determining the maximum switching activity the estimated value (k) is increased by one step size and when determining the minimum switching activity the estimated value (k) reduces. After a decrease or increase of the estimated value (k) the process is repeated and in this way the actual value for the maximum or minimum switching activity of the digital circuit is determined iteratively.
    Type: Application
    Filed: November 21, 2003
    Publication date: June 17, 2004
    Applicant: INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG
    Inventor: Stefan Horeth
  • Publication number: 20040039541
    Abstract: The invention permits a comparison of two technical systems, which according to conventional opinion is not possible to carry out, based on a substantially simpler, technically achievable comparison, in which part systems of one or both systems are specifically replaced. The replacements are performed in a controlled manner by monitoring a replacement condition with constraints. The monitoring of the replacement condition and the generation and monitoring of the necessary constraints occur automatically. A comparison of both systems can thus be carried out based on the replacement of the part systems without introducing a loss of precision in the comparison.
    Type: Application
    Filed: August 28, 2003
    Publication date: February 26, 2004
    Inventors: Stefan Horeth, Peter Warkentin