Abstract: In an ultrasound system and method, a transducer connects to an estimator for obtaining first and second blood flow parameters associated with first and second scan line directions, respectively, in a first scan plane. One beam substantially covering a cross-sectional area of a tubular structure (uniform insonification) or a plurality of beams may be used. A first area associated with the cross-section of the tubular structure is also estimated from the blood flow parameters. The process is repeated for a plurality of scan planes. A processor determines the cross-sectional area of the tubular structure perpendicular to its axis (a second area), the average velocity of flow parallel to the axis, and the volume flow as a function of the first area and the first and second blood flow parameters of all the scan planes. For real-time volume flow, the orientation of the tubular structure is determined using the second area and the first and second blood flow parameters.

Abstract: In an ultrasound system and method, a transducer connects to an estimator for obtaining first and second blood flow parameters associated with first and second scan line directions, respectively, in a first scan plane. One beam substantially covering a cross-sectional area of a tubular structure (uniform insonification) or a plurality of beams may be used. A first area associated with the cross-section of the tubular structure is also estimated from the blood flow parameters. The process is repeated for a plurality of scan planes. A processor determines the cross-sectional area of the tubular structure perpendicular to its axis (a second area), the average velocity of flow parallel to the axis, and the volume flow as a function of the first area and the first and second blood flow parameters of all the scan planes. For real-time volume flow, the orientation of the tubular structure is determined using the second area and the first and second blood flow parameters.

Abstract: An in-vivo correction method for the non-linear, shape dependent spatial distortion in MR images due to magnetic field inhomogeneity including inhomogeneity due to susceptibility variations is disclosed. Geometric distortion at the air/tissue and tissue/bone interfaces before and after the correction is quantified using a phantom. The results are also compared to the "distortion-free" CT images of the same phantom. Magnetic susceptibility of cortical cattle bone was measured using a SQUID magnetometer and found to be -8.86 ppm which is quite similar to that of tissue (-9 ppm). The distortion at the bone/tissue boundary was negligible while that at the air/tissue boundary created displacements of about 2.0 mm with a1.5T main magnetic field and a 3.13 mT/m gradient field, a significant value if MR images are used to localize targets with the high accuracy expected for stereotaxic surgery. The correction method reduces the errors to at least the same level of accuracy as CT.