Patents by Inventor Ty Matthew Thomson
Ty Matthew Thomson has filed for patents to protect the following inventions. This listing includes patent applications that are pending as well as patents that have already been granted by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO).
-
Publication number: 20210179665Abstract: The present disclosure provides powerful technologies for the development, production, characterization, and/or use of stapled peptide compositions. Among other things, the present disclosure provides strategies for defining amino acid sequences particularly amenable or useful for stapling, as well as technologies, reagents, and systems for developing, producing, characterizing, and/or using stapled peptides having such amino acid sequences.Type: ApplicationFiled: August 20, 2019Publication date: June 17, 2021Inventors: John Hanney McGee, Ty Matthew Thomson, Sebastian Christof Theodor Wahl, Gregory L. Verdine, Raheleh Rezaei Araghi, Yue-Mei Zhang, Mark Joseph Mulvihill
-
Patent number: 10878312Abstract: Disclosed herein are system, method, and computer program product embodiments for determining a score for a degree of activation of a biological network. An embodiment constructs a tree graph comprising a root node and a set of child nodes. The root node represents a biological network having a reference node and causal connections among a set of nodes that represent biological entities, biological processes, or other biological networks. Each child node represents a particular node in the biological network and is connected to the root node by a signed, directed edge pointing from the root node to that child node. Each child node also has an associated weight based on one or more paths connecting the child node to the reference node in the biological network. The embodiment further scores the tree graph based on scores assigned to the child nodes and the signs of the singed, directed edges.Type: GrantFiled: June 26, 2015Date of Patent: December 29, 2020Inventors: Ty Matthew Thomson, Dmitry Vasilyev, Florian Martin
-
Publication number: 20160321393Abstract: Scores for particular network models (those having a source node connected to a set of measurable downstream nodes via causal edges) are computed across multiple networks by accounting for an overlap between these models in a manner that reduces cross-network redundancy and increases the specificity of the network models for the network in which they are found. According to another aspect, a meta-network model is created for networks by accounting for the occurrence of network models that are found in multiple networks in a manner that reduces the redundancy across networks and that increases the specificity of the network model score. Preferably, this process provides additional weighting factors for each node in the network model.Type: ApplicationFiled: February 1, 2016Publication date: November 3, 2016Inventors: Ty Matthew Thomson, Dmitry Vasilyev, David Drubin, Brian Frushour
-
Patent number: 9253044Abstract: Scores for particular network models (those having a source node connected to a set of measurable downstream nodes via causal edges) are computed across multiple networks by accounting for an overlap between these models in a manner that reduces cross-network redundancy and increases the specificity of the network models for the network in which they are found. According to another aspect, a meta-network model is created for networks by accounting for the occurrence of network models that are found in multiple networks in a manner that reduces the redundancy across networks and that increases the specificity of the network model score. Preferably, this process provides additional weighting factors for each node in the network model.Type: GrantFiled: January 6, 2014Date of Patent: February 2, 2016Assignee: Selventa, Inc.Inventors: Ty Matthew Thomson, Dmitry Vasilyev, David Drubin, Brian Frushour
-
Publication number: 20150294218Abstract: A method to score a causally consistent network is provided by transforming the network into a hypothesis subnetwork, called a “HYP” (if the nodes have associated measurements) or a “meta-HYP” (if the nodes are themselves HYPs), and then applying known HYP scoring methods (e.g. (NPA, GPI, or the like) based on measurements or scores associated with nodes in the subnetwork. A method also is described for creating a HYP or meta-HYP with weights associated with each downstream node from a causally inconsistent network using a computational technique such as sampling of spanning trees. A further aspect is a method to transform a meta-HYP (with or without weights associated with each downstream node) into a HYP using the weights associated with each downstream node (where the weights are based on the scoring algorithms intended at the meta-HYP and HYP levels).Type: ApplicationFiled: June 26, 2015Publication date: October 15, 2015Inventors: Ty Matthew Thomson, Dmitry Vasilyev, Florian Martin
-
Publication number: 20140297573Abstract: One or more measurement signatures are derived from a knowledge base of casual biological facts, where a signature is a collection of measured node entities and their expected directions of change with respect to a reference node. The knowledge base may be a directed network of experimentally-observed casual relationships among biological entities and processes, and a reference node represents a perturbation. A degree of activation of a signature is then assessed by scoring one or more “differential” data sets against the signature to compute an amplitude score. The amplitude score quantifies fold-changes of measurements in the signature. In one particular embodiment, the amplitude score is a weighted average of adjusted log-fold changes of measured node entities in the signature, wherein an adjustment applied to the log-fold changes is based on their expected direction of change. In an alternative embodiment, the amplitude score is based on quantity effects.Type: ApplicationFiled: June 16, 2014Publication date: October 2, 2014Inventors: Ty Matthew Thomson, Dexter Roydon Pratt, William M. Ladd
-
Patent number: 8843420Abstract: A “Specificity” statistic (or metric) is computed as a means to identify amplitude scores associated with a signature that can be attributed with high probability to a specific biological entity or process represented by the signature. Preferably, Specificity is computed by assessing a likelihood of a given null hypothesis, namely, that an amplitude score is not representative of the specific signature but, instead, is representative of a general trend in the applicable data set that can be measured by any signature that is comparable to the signature of interest. In a typical implementation, a first step to compute the Specificity metric is to construct a set of comparable signatures. Next, an amplitude score is computed for each of these signatures, preferably using the same data set. Then, the Specificity metric is computed, preferably as a two-tailed p-value, by placing the amplitude score for the signature of interest on a distribution of scores for the comparable signatures.Type: GrantFiled: August 19, 2011Date of Patent: September 23, 2014Assignee: Selventa, Inc.Inventors: Ty Matthew Thomson, Dexter Roydon Pratt
-
Patent number: 8812430Abstract: To directly compare two or more network perturbation amplitude scores and identify whether the difference between them is meaningful, an Uncertainty (confidence interval) for each of the scores is computed. According to this disclosure, experimental replicates of the measurements are used to compute the score Uncertainty, based on an assumption that variability between measurement replicates represents a largest source of error in the score. Preferably, at least three (3) experimental replicates for both treated and control conditions are used to compute Uncertainty.Type: GrantFiled: August 20, 2012Date of Patent: August 19, 2014Assignee: Selventa, Inc.Inventors: Ty Matthew Thomson, Dexter Roydon Pratt, David Drubin
-
Patent number: 8756182Abstract: One or more measurement signatures are derived from a knowledge base of casual biological facts, where a signature is a collection of measured node entities and their expected directions of change with respect to a reference node. The knowledge base may be a directed network of experimentally-observed casual relationships among biological entities and processes, and a reference node represents a perturbation. A degree of activation of a signature is then assessed by scoring one or more “differential” data sets against the signature to compute an amplitude score. The amplitude score quantifies fold-changes of measurements in the signature. In one particular embodiment, the amplitude score is a weighted average of adjusted log-fold changes of measured node entities in the signature, wherein an adjustment applied to the log-fold changes is based on their expected direction of change. In an alternative embodiment, the amplitude score is based on quantity effects.Type: GrantFiled: May 31, 2011Date of Patent: June 17, 2014Assignee: Selventa, Inc.Inventors: Ty Matthew Thomson, Dexter Roydon Pratt, William M. Ladd
-
Patent number: 8417661Abstract: One or more measurement signatures are derived from a knowledge base of casual biological facts, where a signature is a collection of measured node entities and their expected directions of change with respect to a reference node. The knowledge base may be a directed network of experimentally-observed casual relationships among biological entities and processes, and a reference node represents a perturbation. A degree of activation of a signature is then assessed by scoring one or more “differential” data sets against the signature to compute an amplitude score. The amplitude score quantifies fold-changes of measurements in the signature. In one particular embodiment, the amplitude score is a weighted average of adjusted log-fold changes of measured node entities in the signature, wherein an adjustment applied to the log-fold changes is based on their expected direction of change. In an alternative embodiment, the amplitude score is based on quantity effects.Type: GrantFiled: May 4, 2012Date of Patent: April 9, 2013Assignee: Selventa, Inc.Inventors: Ty Matthew Thomson, Dexter Roydon Pratt, William M. Ladd
-
Publication number: 20130046726Abstract: A “Specificity” statistic (or metric) is computed as a means to identify amplitude scores associated with a signature that can be attributed with high probability to a specific biological entity or process represented by the signature. Preferably, Specificity is computed by assessing a likelihood of a given null hypothesis, namely, that an amplitude score is not representative of the specific signature but, instead, is representative of a general trend in the applicable data set that can be measured by any signature that is comparable to the signature of interest. In a typical implementation, a first step to compute the Specificity metric is to construct a set of comparable signatures. Next, an amplitude score is computed for each of these signatures, preferably using the same data set. Then, the Specificity metric is computed, preferably as a two-tailed p-value, by placing the amplitude score for the signature of interest on a distribution of scores for the comparable signatures.Type: ApplicationFiled: August 19, 2011Publication date: February 21, 2013Applicant: SELVENTA, INC.Inventors: Ty Matthew Thomson, Dexter Roydon Pratt
-
Publication number: 20120221506Abstract: One or more measurement signatures are derived from a knowledge base of casual biological facts, where a signature is a collection of measured node entities and their expected directions of change with respect to a reference node. The knowledge base may be a directed network of experimentally-observed casual relationships among biological entities and processes, and a reference node represents a perturbation. A degree of activation of a signature is then assessed by scoring one or more “differential” data sets against the signature to compute an amplitude score. The amplitude score quantifies fold-changes of measurements in the signature. In one particular embodiment, the amplitude score is a weighted average of adjusted log-fold changes of measured node entities in the signature, wherein an adjustment applied to the log-fold changes is based on their expected direction of change. In an alternative embodiment, the amplitude score is based on quantity effects.Type: ApplicationFiled: May 4, 2012Publication date: August 30, 2012Applicant: SELVENTA, INC.Inventors: Ty Matthew Thomson, Dexter Roydon Pratt, William M. Ladd
-
Publication number: 20120030162Abstract: One or more measurement signatures are derived from a knowledge base of casual biological facts, where a signature is a collection of measured node entities and their expected directions of change with respect to a reference node. The knowledge base may be a directed network of experimentally-observed casual relationships among biological entities and processes, and a reference node represents a perturbation. A degree of activation of a signature is then assessed by scoring one or more “differential” data sets against the signature to compute an amplitude score. The amplitude score quantifies fold-changes of measurements in the signature. In one particular embodiment, the amplitude score is a weighted average of adjusted log-fold changes of measured node entities in the signature, wherein an adjustment applied to the log-fold changes is based on their expected direction of change. In an alternative embodiment, the amplitude score is based on quantity effects.Type: ApplicationFiled: May 31, 2011Publication date: February 2, 2012Applicant: SELVENTA, INC.Inventors: Ty Matthew Thomson, Dexter Roydon Pratt, William M. Ladd