Abstract: A method and system are provided to infer and use machine learning algorithms that is applied to financial data and also to determine: (i) compliance with the applied algorithms, and (ii) whether any exceptions to and/or variations from the algorithms are within an organization's norms. A method includes: receiving financial data; applying a set of dynamic or interdependent algorithms to the received financial data to obtain a set of outcomes; and using a machine learning classifier to classify the outcomes as: (i) algorithm compliant, (ii) potentially algorithm non-compliant, or (iii) algorithm non-compliant. Additionally, the method includes generating controllership persona based actionable triggers, which on acceptance corrects the anomalies in financial data, enabling the method and system to perform as a comprehensive, contextual, consistent & machine learning powered, persona based real time controllership engine leading to reduced misstatements in reported financial data.

Abstract: In an approach for visualizing metrics towards optimizing application performance, a processor identifies an application, running in a user interface, on a cloud platform. A processor calculates information metrics of the application. A processor presents the information metrics on the user interface with the application.

Abstract: Zero-touch monitoring devices and systems are disclosed that are configured with hardware to perform a process-mining on an event-to-entry process associated with an organization to collect data information associated with the process, determine an input-related zero-touch quotient for the event-to-entry process based on the data information, determine a rule-related zero-touch quotient for the event-to-entry process based on the data information, determine a zero-touch potential predictive accounting factor (ZTP PAF) value for the event-to-entry process, and generate a zero-touch processing quotient for the event-to-entry process based on the input-related zero-touch quotient, the rule-related zero-touch quotient, and the ZTP PAF value. The ZTP PAF value quantifies an incremental zero-touch potential for the event-to-entry process and corresponding attributes.

Abstract: A method for driving zero time-to-insight and effectiveness of insight-to-nudge in a decision-making process. The method includes identifying a scope associated with a data-to-action loop in the decision-making process. The method further includes determining, by a zero time-to-insight engine, a zero time-to-insight quotient for a data-to-insight loop included in the data-to-action loop. The method additionally includes determining, by an insight-to-nudge engine, an insight-to-nudge quotient for an insight-to-action loop included in the data-to-action loop. The method additionally includes determining, by a predictive model factor component, a data-to-action prediction model factor (D2A PMF) for the data-to-action loop, where the D2A PMF quantifies an incremental zero time-to-insight potential for the data-to-action loop and corresponding attributes.

Abstract: A method for assessing user experience includes determining one or more experience journey maps, identifying personas included in the one or more experience journey maps, and collecting user experience related data from the personas included in the one or more experience journey maps. The method further includes identifying user experience gaps based on an analysis performed on the experience related data collected, and providing a graphical representation that highlights the user experience gaps. The method also includes generating recommendations for execution to mitigate the user experience gaps highlighted in the graphical representation, monitoring and tracking a progress of the executed recommendations, and performing automated monitoring and offset metric tracking of targeted experience-related input metrics used to gauge a performance of the executed recommendations.

Abstract: A method for assessing user experience includes determining one or more experience journey maps, identifying personas included in the one or more experience journey maps, and collecting user experience related data from the personas included in the one or more experience journey maps. The method further includes identifying user experience gaps based on an analysis performed on the experience related data collected, and providing a graphical representation that highlights the user experience gaps. The method also includes generating recommendations for execution to mitigate the user experience gaps highlighted in the graphical representation, monitoring and tracking a progress of the executed recommendations, and performing automated monitoring and offset metric tracking of targeted experience-related input metrics used to gauge a performance of the executed recommendations.

Abstract: A method and system are provided to infer and use machine learning algorithms that is applied to financial data and also to determine: (i) compliance with the applied algorithms, and (ii) whether any exceptions to and/or variations from the algorithms are within an organization's norms. A method includes: receiving financial data; applying a set of dynamic or interdependent algorithms to the received financial data to obtain a set of outcomes; and using a machine learning classifier to classify the outcomes as: (i) algorithm compliant, (ii) potentially algorithm non-compliant, or (iii) algorithm non-compliant. Additionally, the method includes generating controllership persona based actionable triggers, which on acceptance corrects the anomalies in financial data, enabling the method and system to perform as a comprehensive, contextual, consistent & machine learning powered, persona based real time controllership engine leading to reduced misstatements in reported financial data.

Abstract: A method for assessing user experience includes determining one or more experience journey maps, identifying personas included in the one or more experience journey maps, and collecting user experience related data from the personas included in the one or more experience journey maps. The method further includes identifying user experience gaps based on an analysis performed on the experience related data collected, and providing a graphical representation that highlights the user experience gaps. The method also includes generating recommendations for execution to mitigate the user experience gaps highlighted in the graphical representation, monitoring and tracking a progress of the executed recommendations, and performing automated monitoring and offset metric tracking of targeted experience-related input metrics used to gauge a performance of the executed recommendations.

Abstract: The present disclosure relates to determining automation potential of a process by dividing the process into subsidiary processes corresponding to five hierarchical tiers, assessing the subsidiary processes by selecting a value for each of one or more parameters for each of the subsidiary processes at the tier five, computing a score for the subsidiary processes at the tier five based on the selected values, identifying a category of automation for the subsidiary processes in the tier five based on the score for the subsidiary processes at the tier five; determining an automation potential indicator for the subsidiary processes in the tier five based on the category of automation and the score; computing a maximum automation potential indicator and an automation potential indicator at each hierarchical tier based on a maximum automation potential indicator and an automation potential indicator at immediately lower tier to compute the automation potential for the process.

Abstract: The present disclosure relates to determining automation potential of a process by dividing the process into subsidiary processes corresponding to five hierarchical tiers, assessing the subsidiary processes by selecting a value for each of one or more parameters for each of the subsidiary processes at the tier five, computing a score for the subsidiary processes at the tier five based on the selected values, identifying a category of automation for the subsidiary processes in the tier five based on the score for the subsidiary processes at the tier five; determining an automation potential indicator for the subsidiary processes in the tier five based on the category of automation and the score; computing a maximum automation potential indicator and an automation potential indicator at each hierarchical tier based on a maximum automation potential indicator and an automation potential indicator at immediately lower tier to compute the automation potential for the process.