Magnetic tape device and magnetic reproducing method

- FUJIFILM Corporation

The magnetic tape device includes: a magnetic tape; and a reproducing head, in which a magnetic tape transportation speed of the magnetic tape device is equal to or lower than 18 m/sec, the reproducing head is a magnetic head including a tunnel magnetoresistance effect type element as a reproducing element, the magnetic tape includes a non-magnetic support, and a magnetic layer including ferromagnetic powder and a binding agent on the non-magnetic support, and a coefficient of friction measured regarding a base portion of a surface of the magnetic layer is equal to or smaller than 0.30.

Skip to: Description  ·  Claims  ·  References Cited  · Patent History  ·  Patent History
Description
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims priority under 35 U.S.C 119 to Japanese Patent Application No. 2016-254430 filed on Dec. 27, 2016. The above application is hereby expressly incorporated by reference, in its entirety, into the present application.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention

The present invention relates to a magnetic tape device and a magnetic reproducing method.

2. Description of the Related Art

Magnetic recording is used as a method of recording information in a recording medium. In the magnetic recording, information is recorded on a magnetic recording medium as a magnetized pattern. Information recorded on a magnetic recording medium is reproduced by reading a magnetic signal obtained from the magnetized pattern by a magnetic head. As a magnetic head used for such reproducing, various magnetic heads have been proposed (for example, see JP2004-185676A).

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

An increase in recording capacity (high capacity) of a magnetic recording medium is required in accordance with a great increase in information content in recent years. As means for realizing high capacity, a technology of increasing a recording density of a magnetic recording medium is used. However, as the recording density increases, a magnetic signal (specifically, a leakage magnetic field) obtained from a magnetic layer tends to become weak. Accordingly, it is desired that a high-sensitivity magnetic head capable of reading a weak signal with excellent sensitivity is used as a reproducing head. Regarding the sensitivity of the magnetic head, it is said that a magnetoresistive (MR) head using a magnetoresistance effect as an operating principle has excellent sensitivity, compared to an inductive head used in the related art.

As the MR head, an anisotropic magnetoresistive (AMR) head and a giant magnetoresistive (GMR) head are known as disclosed in a paragraph 0003 of JP2004-185676A. The GMR head is an MR head having excellent sensitivity than that of the AMR head. In addition, a tunnel magnetoresistive (TMR) head disclosed in a paragraph 0004 and the like of JP2004-185676A is an MR head having a high possibility of realizing higher sensitivity.

Meanwhile, a recording and reproducing system of the magnetic recording is broadly divided into a levitation type and a sliding type. A magnetic recording medium in which information is recorded by the magnetic recording is broadly divided into a magnetic disk and a magnetic tape. Hereinafter, a drive including a magnetic disk as a magnetic recording medium is referred to as a “magnetic disk device” and a drive including a magnetic tape as a magnetic recording medium is referred to as a “magnetic tape device”.

The magnetic disk device is generally called a hard disk drive (HDD) and a levitation type recording and reproducing system is used. In the magnetic disk device, a shape of a surface of a magnetic head slider facing a magnetic disk and a head suspension assembly that supports the magnetic head slider are designed so that a predetermined interval between a magnetic disk and a magnetic head can be maintained with air flow at the time of rotation of the magnetic disk. In such a magnetic disk device, information is recorded and reproduced in a state where the magnetic disk and the magnetic head do not come into contact with each other. The recording and reproducing system described above is the levitation type. On the other hand, a sliding type recording and reproducing system is used in the magnetic tape device. In the magnetic tape device, a surface of a magnetic layer of a magnetic tape and a magnetic head come into contact with each other and slide on each other, at the time of the recording and reproducing information.

JP2004-185676A proposes usage of the TMR head in the magnetic disk device. On the other hand, the usage of the TMR head in the magnetic tape device is currently still in a stage where the further use thereof is expected. The reason why the usage thereof is not yet practically realized is because it is not necessary that a reproducing head used in the magnetic tape device have sensitivity improved enough for using the TMR head. Nevertheless, in a case where the TMR head can be used as the reproducing head even in the magnetic tape device, it is possible to deal with higher-density recording of a magnetic tape in the future.

Therefore, an object of one aspect of the invention is to provide a magnetic tape device in which a TMR head is mounted as a reproducing head.

A magnetoresistance effect which is an operating principle of the MR head such as the TMR head is a phenomenon in which electric resistance changes. The MR head detects a change in leakage magnetic field generated from a magnetic recording medium as a change in resistance value (electric resistance) and reproduces information by converting the change in resistance value into a change in voltage. It is said that a resistance value of the TMR head is generally high, as disclosed in a paragraph 0007 of JP2004-185676A, but generation of a significant decrease in resistance value in the TMR head may cause a decrease in reproduction output and a deterioration of electromagnetic conversion characteristics (specifically, signal-to-noise-ratio (SNR)) accompanied with that.

During intensive studies for achieving the object described above, the inventors have found a phenomenon which was not known in the related art, in that, in a case of using the TMR head as a reproducing head in the magnetic tape device, a significant decrease in resistance value (electric resistance) occurs in the TMR head. A decrease in resistance value of the TMR head is a decrease in electric resistance measured by bringing an electric resistance measuring device into contact with a wiring connecting two electrodes configuring a tunnel magnetoresistance effect type element included in the TMR head. The phenomenon in which this resistance value significantly decreases is not observed in a case of using the TMR head in the magnetic disk device, nor in a case of using other MR heads such as the GMR head in the magnetic disk device or the magnetic tape device. That is, occurrence of a significant decrease in resistance value in the TMR head in a case of reproducing information by using the TMR head as a reproducing head was not even confirmed in the related art. A difference in the recording and reproducing system between the magnetic disk device and the magnetic tape device, specifically, contact and non-contact between a magnetic recording medium and a magnetic head at the time of the reproducing may be the reason why a significant decrease in resistance value of the TMR head occurred in the magnetic tape device is not observed in the magnetic disk device. In addition, the TMR head has a special structure in which two electrodes are provided with an insulating layer (tunnel barrier layer) interposed therebetween in a direction in which a magnetic tape is transported, which is not applied to other MR heads which are currently practically used, and it is considered that this is the reason why a significant decrease in resistance value occurring in the TMR head is not observed in other MR heads.

With respect to this, as a result of more intensive studies after finding the phenomenon described above, the inventors have newly found the following points.

It is desired that a transportation speed of a magnetic tape of a magnetic tape device is decreased, in order to prevent a deterioration in recording and reproducing characteristics. But, in a case where the transportation speed of the magnetic tape of the magnetic tape device is set to be equal to or smaller than a predetermined value (specifically, equal to or lower than 18 m/sec), a decrease in resistance value of the TMR head particularly significantly occurs.

However, such a decrease in resistance value can be prevented by using a magnetic tape described below as the magnetic tape.

One aspect of the invention has been completed based on the finding described above.

That is, according to one aspect of the invention, there is provided a magnetic tape device comprising: a magnetic tape; and a reproducing head, in which a magnetic tape transportation speed of the magnetic tape device is equal to or lower than 18 m/sec, the reproducing head is a magnetic head (hereinafter, also referred to as a “TMR head”) including a tunnel magnetoresistance effect type element (hereinafter, also referred to as a “TMR element”) as a reproducing element, the magnetic tape includes a non-magnetic support, and a magnetic layer including ferromagnetic powder and a binding agent on the non-magnetic support, and a coefficient of friction measured regarding a base portion of a surface of the magnetic layer, is equal to or smaller than 0.30.

According to another aspect of the invention, there is provided a magnetic reproducing method comprising: reproducing information recorded on a magnetic tape by a reproducing head, in which a magnetic tape transportation speed during the reproducing is equal to or lower than 18 m/sec, the reproducing head is a magnetic head including a tunnel magnetoresistance effect type element as a reproducing element, the magnetic tape includes a non-magnetic support and a magnetic layer including ferromagnetic powder and a binding agent on the non-magnetic support, and a coefficient of friction measured regarding a base portion of a surface of the magnetic layer, is equal to or smaller than 0.30.

The “base portion” of the invention and the specification is a portion of the surface of the magnetic layer of the magnetic tape specified by the following method. In the invention and the specification, the “surface of the magnetic layer” of the magnetic tape is identical to the surface of the magnetic tape on the magnetic layer side. A surface on which volume of a protrusion and volume of a recess in a visual field measured by an atomic force microscope (AFM) are identical to each other is determined as a reference surface. A projection having a height equal to or greater than 15 nm from the reference surface is defined as a projection. A portion in which the number of such projections is zero, that is, a portion of the surface of the magnetic layer of the magnetic tape in which a projection having a height equal to or greater than 15 nm from the reference surface is not detected is specified as the base portion.

A coefficient of friction measured regarding the base portion is a value measured by the following method.

In the base portion (measured part: length of the magnetic tape in a longitudinal direction of 10 μm), a diamond spherical indenter having a radius of 1 μm is allowed to reciprocate once with a load of 100 μN and a speed of 1 μm/sec to measure a frictional force (horizontal force) and a normal force. The frictional force and the normal force measured here are arithmetical means of respective values obtained by continuously measuring frictional forces and normal forces during the one reciprocating operation. The measurement described above can be performed with TI-950 type TRIBOINDENTER manufactured by Hysitron, Inc. A value of a coefficient of friction pt is calculated from an arithmetical mean of the frictional forces and an arithmetical mean of the normal forces measured as described above. The coefficient of friction is a value measured by an equation of F=μN, from the frictional force (horizontal force) F (unit: newton (N)) and the normal force N (unit: newton (N)). The measurement and the calculation of the value of the coefficient of friction p are performed at three portions of the base portion arbitrarily selected from the surface of the magnetic layer of the magnetic tape, and an arithmetical mean of the three measured values obtained is set as a coefficient of friction measured regarding the base portion. Hereinafter, the coefficient of friction measured regarding the base portion is also referred to as a “base friction”.

One aspect of the magnetic tape device and the magnetic reproducing method is as follows.

In one aspect, the coefficient of friction measured regarding the base portion of the surface of the magnetic layer is 0.20 to 0.30.

In one aspect, a center line average surface roughness Ra measured regarding a surface of the magnetic layer is equal to or smaller than 2.8 nm.

In the invention and the specification, the center line average surface roughness Ra measured regarding the surface of the magnetic layer of the magnetic tape is a value measured with an atomic force microscope in a region having an area of 40 μm×40 μm. As an example of the measurement conditions, the following measurement conditions can be used. The center line average surface roughness Ra shown in examples which will be described later is a value obtained by the measurement under the following measurement conditions.

The measurement is performed regarding the region of 40 μm×40 μm of the area of the surface of the magnetic layer of the magnetic tape with an AFM (Nanoscope 4 manufactured by Veeco Instruments, Inc.). A scan speed (probe movement speed) is set as 40 μm/sec and a resolution is set as 512 pixel×512 pixel.

In one aspect, the center line average surface roughness Ra is equal to or smaller than 2.5 nm.

In one aspect, the magnetic tape includes a non-magnetic layer including non-magnetic powder and a binding agent between the non-magnetic support and the magnetic layer, and a total thickness of the magnetic layer and the non-magnetic layer is equal to or smaller than 1.8 μm.

In one aspect, the total thickness of the magnetic layer and the non-magnetic layer is equal to or smaller than 1.1 μm.

According to one aspect of the invention, it is possible to prevent occurrence of a significant decrease in resistance value in the TMR head, in a case of reproducing information recorded on the magnetic tape at a magnetic tape transportation speed equal to or lower than 18 m/sec.

DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

Magnetic Tape Device

One aspect of the invention relates to a magnetic tape device including: a magnetic tape; and a reproducing head, in which a magnetic tape transportation speed of the magnetic tape device is equal to or lower than 18 m/sec, the reproducing head is a magnetic head including a tunnel magnetoresistance effect type element as a reproducing element, the magnetic tape includes a non-magnetic support, and a magnetic layer including ferromagnetic powder and a binding agent on the non-magnetic support, and a coefficient of friction measured regarding a base portion of a surface of the magnetic layer is equal to or smaller than 0.30.

As a result of intensive studies of the inventors, the inventors have newly found that it is possible to prevent a phenomenon in which a decrease in resistance value of the TMR head occurs particularly significantly at the time of reproducing in the magnetic tape device in which the magnetic tape transportation speed is equal to or lower than 18 m/sec, by using the magnetic tape which includes the magnetic layer including ferromagnetic powder and a binding agent on the non-magnetic support, and in which the coefficient of friction measured regarding the base portion of the surface of the magnetic layer is equal to or smaller than 0.30. This point will be further described below.

In the magnetic tape device, in a case of using a magnetic tape of the related art, in a case of performing reproducing by using a TMR head as a reproducing head under specific conditions in which the magnetic tape transportation speed is equal to or lower than 18 m/sec, a phenomenon in which a resistance value (electric resistance) significantly decreases in the TMR head occurs. This phenomenon is a phenomenon that has been newly found by the inventors. The inventors have considered the reason for the occurrence of such a phenomenon is as follows.

The TMR head is a magnetic head using a tunnel magnetoresistance effect and includes two electrodes with an insulating layer (tunnel barrier layer) interposed therebetween. The tunnel barrier layer positioned between the two electrodes is an insulating layer, and thus, even in a case where a voltage is applied between the two electrodes, in general, a current does not flow or does not substantially flow between the electrodes. However, a current (tunnel current) flows by a tunnel effect depending on a direction of a magnetic field of a free layer affected by a leakage magnetic field from the magnetic tape, and a change in amount of a tunnel current flow is detected as a change in resistance value by the tunnel magnetoresistance effect. By converting the change in resistance value into a change in voltage, information recorded on the magnetic tape can be reproduced.

Examples of a structure of the MR head include a current-in-plane (CIP) structure and a current-perpendicular-to-plane (CPP) structure, and the TMR head is a magnetic head having a CPP structure. In the MR head having a CPP structure, a current flows in a direction perpendicular to a film surface of an MR element, that is, a direction in which the magnetic tape is transported, in a case of reproducing information recorded on the magnetic tape. With respect to this, other MR heads, for example, a spin valve type GMR head which is widely used in recent years among the GMR heads has a CIP structure. In the MR head having a CIP structure, a current flows in a direction in a film plane of an MR element, that is, a direction perpendicular to a direction in which the magnetic tape is transported, in a case of reproducing information recorded on the magnetic tape.

As described above, the TMR head has a special structure which is not applied to other MR heads which are currently practically used. Accordingly, in a case where short circuit (bypass due to damage) occurs even at one portion between the two electrodes, the resistance value significantly decreases. A significant decrease in resistance value in a case of the short circuit occurring even at one portion between the two electrodes as described above is a phenomenon which does not occur in other MR heads. In the magnetic disk device using a levitation type recording and reproducing system, a magnetic disk and a reproducing head do not come into contact with each other at the time of reproducing, and thus, damage causing short circuit hardly occurs. On the other hand, in the magnetic tape device using a sliding type recording and reproducing system, the TMR head is damaged due to sliding between the TMR head and the magnetic tape, and thus, short circuit easily occurs. Among these, the inventors have thought that, in a case where the transportation speed of the magnetic tape is as low as a speed equal to or lower than 18 m/sec, a possibility that the TMR head comes into contact with the base portion of the surface of the magnetic layer at the time of reproducing increases, compared to a case where the transportation speed of the magnetic tape exceeds 18 m/sec. Accordingly, the inventors have surmised that, in a case where any measures are not prepared, the TMR head is affected by the contact with the base portion and the TMR head is easily damaged. The inventors have assumed that this is the reason why a decrease in resistance value of the TMR head occurs particularly significantly at the time of reproducing in the magnetic tape device in which the magnetic tape transportation speed is equal to or lower than 18 m/sec.

With respect to this, according to the magnetic tape in which a coefficient of friction (base friction) measured regarding the base portion of the surface of the magnetic layer is equal to or smaller than 0.30, it is possible to allow the TMR head coming into contact with the base portion to smoothly slide on the base portion. Accordingly, the inventors have surmised that the reducing of the effect on the TMR head due to the contact with the base portion contributes to the prevention of occurrence of short circuit due to a damage on the TMR head.

However, the above descriptions are merely a surmise of the inventors and the invention is not limited thereto.

Regarding the base friction, JP2016-071912A discloses that the base friction is set to be in a specific range, in order to prevent a decrease in electromagnetic conversion characteristics of a thinned magnetic tape during repeated running. However, as described above, the usage of the TMR head as a reproducing head in the magnetic tape device is still currently in a stage where the further use thereof is expected. In addition, in the magnetic tape device in which the TMR head is mounted as a reproducing head, the occurrence of a particularly significant decrease in resistance value of the TMR head at a specific magnetic tape transportation speed (specifically, equal to or lower than 18 m/sec) is a phenomenon which was not known in the related art. With respect to such a phenomenon, the effect of the base friction and a possibility of prevention of the phenomenon by setting the base friction to be equal to or smaller than 0.30 are not disclosed in JP2016-071912A and is newly found by the inventors as a result of intensive studies.

Hereinafter, the magnetic tape device will be described more specifically. A “decrease in resistance value of the TMR head” described below is a significant decrease in resistance value of the TMR head occurring in a case of reproducing information recorded on the magnetic tape by the TMR head, in the magnetic tape device having the magnetic tape transportation speed equal to or lower than 18 m/sec, otherwise not noted.

Magnetic Tape

Base Friction

The coefficient of friction (base friction) measured regarding the base portion of the surface of the magnetic layer of the magnetic tape is equal to or smaller than 0.30, from a viewpoint of preventing a decrease in resistance value of the TMR head, and is preferably equal to or smaller than 0.28 and more preferably equal to or smaller than 0.26, from a viewpoint of further preventing a decrease in resistance value of the TMR head. The base friction can be, for example, equal to or greater than 0.10, equal to or greater than 0.15, or equal to or greater than 0.20. However, from a viewpoint of preventing a decrease in resistance value of the TMR head, a low base friction is preferable, and thus, the base friction may be smaller than the values described above.

In the measurement method of the base friction described above, the reason why a projection having a height equal to or greater than 15 nm from the reference surface is defined as a projection is because, normally, a projection recognized as a projection present on the surface of the magnetic layer is mainly a projection having a height equal to or greater than 15 nm from the reference surface. Such a projection is, for example, formed of non-magnetic powder such as an abrasive on the surface of the magnetic layer. With respect to this, it is considered that more microscopic ruggedness than ruggedness formed by such a projection is present on the surface of the magnetic layer. The inventors have surmised that it is possible to adjust the base friction by controlling a shape of the microscopic ruggedness. As a method for realizing the adjustment described above, a method of using two or more kinds of ferromagnetic powders having different average particle sizes as the ferromagnetic powder is used. More specifically, it is thought that, the microscopic ruggedness can be formed on the base portion, in a case where the ferromagnetic powder having a greater average particle size becomes a protrusion, and it is possible to increase a percentage of the protrusion present on the base portion by increasing a mixing percentage of the ferromagnetic powder having a greater average particle size (or, conversely, to decrease a percentage of protrusion present on the base portion by decreasing the mixing percentage). Such a method will be described later more specifically.

As another method, a method of forming a magnetic layer with other non-magnetic powder having a greater average particle size than that of ferromagnetic powder, in addition to non-magnetic powder such as an abrasive which can form a projection having a height equal to or greater than 15 nm from the reference surface on the surface of the magnetic layer. More specifically, it is thought that, the microscopic ruggedness can be formed on the base portion, in a case where the other non-magnetic powder becomes a protrusion, and it is possible to increase a percentage of the protrusion present on the base portion by increasing a mixing percentage of the non-magnetic powder (or, conversely, to decrease a percentage of protrusion present on the base portion by decreasing the mixing percentage). Such a method will be described later more specifically.

In addition, it is also possible to adjust the base friction by combining the two kinds of methods.

However, the adjustment methods are merely examples, and it is possible to realize a base friction equal to or smaller than 0.30 by an arbitrary method capable of adjusting the base friction, and such an aspect is also included in the invention.

Next, the magnetic layer and the like included in the magnetic tape will be described more specifically.

Magnetic Layer

Ferromagnetic Powder

As the ferromagnetic powder included in the magnetic layer, ferromagnetic powder normally used in the magnetic layer of various magnetic recording media can be used.

As described above, as a method of adjusting the base friction, a method of forming a magnetic layer with two or more kinds of ferromagnetic powders having different average particle sizes as ferromagnetic powder is used. In this case, it is preferable that the ferromagnetic powder having a smaller average particle size is used as ferromagnetic powder used with the largest proportion, among the two or more kinds of ferromagnetic powder, from a viewpoint of improving recording density of the magnetic tape. From this viewpoint, in a case where two or more kinds of ferromagnetic powders having different average particle sizes are used as ferromagnetic powder of a magnetic layer, it is preferable that the ferromagnetic powder having an average particle size equal to or smaller than 50 nm is used as the ferromagnetic powder used with the largest proportion. On the other hand, it is preferable that an average particle size of the ferromagnetic powder used with the largest proportion is equal to or greater than 10 nm, from a viewpoint of stability of magnetization. In a case of using one kind of ferromagnetic powder without using two or more kinds of ferromagnetic powders having different average particle sizes, the average particle size of the ferromagnetic powder is preferably equal to or smaller than 50 nm and more preferably equal to or greater than 10 nm, due to the reasons described above.

With respect to this, it is preferable that the ferromagnetic powder used with the ferromagnetic powder used with the largest proportion has a greater average particle size than that of the ferromagnetic powder used with the largest proportion. This may be because the base friction can be decreased due to the protrusion formed of the ferromagnetic powder having a great average particle size on the base portion. From this viewpoint, a difference between an average particle size of the ferromagnetic powder most frequently used and an average particle size of the ferromagnetic powder used therewith, acquired as “(latter average particle size)−(former average particle size)” is preferably 10 to 80 nm, more preferably 10 to 50 nm, even more preferably 10 to 40 nm, and still more preferably 12 to 35 nm. As the ferromagnetic powder used with the ferromagnetic powder used with the largest proportion, it is also possible to use two or more kinds of ferromagnetic powders having different average particle sizes. In this case, it is preferable that an average particle size of at least one of ferromagnetic powder of the two or more kinds of ferromagnetic powders satisfies the difference described above, it is more preferable that average particle sizes of more kinds of ferromagnetic powders satisfy the difference described above, and it is even more preferable that average particle sizes of all of the ferromagnetic powders satisfy the difference described above, with respect to the average particle size of the ferromagnetic powder used with the largest proportion.

Regarding two or more kinds of ferromagnetic powders having different average particle sizes, from a viewpoint of controlling base friction, a mixing ratio of the ferromagnetic powder used with the largest proportion to the other ferromagnetic powder (in a case of using two or more kinds of ferromagnetic powders having different average particle sizes as other ferromagnetic powder, the total thereof), is preferably 90.0:10.0 (former:latter) to 99.9:0.1 and more preferably 95.0:5.0 to 99.5:0.5 based on mass.

Here, the ferromagnetic powders having different average particle sizes indicate the total or a part of a batch of the ferromagnetic powders having different average particle sizes. In a case where particle size distribution based on the number or volume of the ferromagnetic powder included in the magnetic layer of the magnetic tape formed with the ferromagnetic powders having different average particle sizes as described above is measured by a well-known measurement method such as a dynamic light scattering method or a laser diffraction method, an average particle size or a maximum peak in the vicinity thereof of the ferromagnetic powder used with the largest proportion can be normally confirmed in a particle size distribution curve obtained by the measurement. In addition, an average particle size or a peak in the vicinity thereof of each ferromagnetic powder may be confirmed. Accordingly, in a case where the particle size distribution of the ferromagnetic powder included in the magnetic layer of the magnetic tape formed by most frequently using ferromagnetic powder having an average particle size of 10 to 50 nm, for example, is measured, the maximum peak can be generally confirmed in a range of the particle size of 10 to 50 nm in the particle size distribution curve.

A part of the other ferromagnetic powders described above may be substituted with other non-magnetic powder which will be described later.

In the invention and the specification, average particle sizes of various powder such as the ferromagnetic powder and the like are values measured by the following method with a transmission electron microscope, unless otherwise noted.

The powder is imaged at a magnification ratio of 100,000 with a transmission electron microscope, the image is printed on printing paper so that the total magnification of 500,000 to obtain an image of particles configuring the powder. A target particle is selected from the obtained image of particles, an outline of the particle is traced with a digitizer, and a size of the particle (primary particle) is measured. The primary particle is an independent particle which is not aggregated.

The measurement described above is performed regarding 500 particles arbitrarily extracted. An arithmetical mean of the particle size of 500 particles obtained as described above is an average particle size of the powder. As the transmission electron microscope, a transmission electron microscope H-9000 manufactured by Hitachi, Ltd. can be used, for example. In addition, the measurement of the particle size can be performed by well-known image analysis software, for example, image analysis software KS-400 manufactured by Carl Zeiss.

In the invention and the specification, the average particle size of the ferromagnetic powder and other powder is an average particle size obtained by the method described above, unless otherwise noted. The average particle size shown in examples which will be described later is a value measured by using transmission electron microscope H-9000 manufactured by Hitachi, Ltd. as the transmission electron microscope, and image analysis software KS-400 manufactured by Carl Zeiss as the image analysis software, unless otherwise noted.

In the invention and the specification, the powder means an aggregate of a plurality of particles. For example, the ferromagnetic powder means an aggregate of a plurality of ferromagnetic particles. The aggregate of the plurality of particles not only includes an aspect in which particles configuring the aggregate directly come into contact with each other, and also includes an aspect in which a binding agent or an additive which will be described later is interposed between the particles. A term “particles” is also used for describing the powder.

As a method of collecting a sample powder from the magnetic tape in order to measure the particle size, a method disclosed in a paragraph of 0015 of JP2011-048878A can be used, for example.

In the invention and the specification, unless otherwise noted, (1) in a case where the shape of the particle observed in the particle image described above is a needle shape, a fusiform shape, or a columnar shape (here, a height is greater than a maximum long diameter of a bottom surface), the size (particle size) of the particles configuring the powder is shown as a length of a long axis configuring the particle, that is, a long axis length, (2) in a case where the shape of the particle is a planar shape or a columnar shape (here, a thickness or a height is smaller than a maximum long diameter of a plate surface or a bottom surface), the particle size is shown as a maximum long diameter of the plate surface or the bottom surface, and (3) in a case where the shape of the particle is a sphere shape, a polyhedron shape, or an unspecified shape, and the long axis configuring the particles cannot be specified from the shape, the particle size is shown as an equivalent circle diameter. The equivalent circle diameter is a value obtained by a circle projection method.

In addition, regarding an average acicular ratio of the powder, a length of a short axis, that is, a short axis length of the particles is measured in the measurement described above, a value of (long axis length/short axis length) of each particle is obtained, and an arithmetical mean of the values obtained regarding 500 particles is calculated. Here, unless otherwise noted, in a case of (1), the short axis length as the definition of the particle size is a length of a short axis configuring the particle, in a case of (2), the short axis length is a thickness or a height, and in a case of (3), the long axis and the short axis are not distinguished, thus, the value of (long axis length/short axis length) is assumed as 1, for convenience.

In addition, unless otherwise noted, in a case where the shape of the particle is specified, for example, in a case of definition of the particle size (1), the average particle size is an average long axis length, in a case of the definition (2), the average particle size is an average plate diameter, and an average plate ratio is an arithmetical mean of (maximum long diameter/thickness or height). In a case of the definition (3), the average particle size is an average diameter (also referred to as an average particle diameter).

As a preferred specific example of the ferromagnetic powder, ferromagnetic hexagonal ferrite powder can be used. In a case where the ferromagnetic powder used with the largest proportion is ferromagnetic hexagonal ferrite powder, an average particle size thereof is preferably 10 nm to 50 nm and more preferably 20 nm to 50 nm, from a viewpoint of realization of high-density recording and stability of magnetization. For details of the ferromagnetic hexagonal ferrite powder, descriptions disclosed in paragraphs 0012 to 0030 of JP2011-225417A, paragraphs 0134 to 0136 of JP2011-216149A, and paragraphs 0013 to 0030 of JP2012-204726A can be referred to, for example.

As a preferred specific example of the ferromagnetic powder, ferromagnetic metal powder can also be used. In a case where the ferromagnetic powder used with the largest proportion is ferromagnetic metal powder, an average particle size thereof is preferably 10 nm to 50 nm and more preferably 20 nm to 50 nm, from a viewpoint of realization of high-density recording and stability of magnetization. For details of the ferromagnetic metal powder, descriptions disclosed in paragraphs 0137 to 0141 of JP2011-216149A and paragraphs 0009 to 0023 of JP2005-251351A can be referred to, for example.

As the ferromagnetic powder, the magnetic tape may include only one of ferromagnetic hexagonal ferrite powder and ferromagnetic metal powder, may include both thereof, or may include other ferromagnetic powders with one or both thereof.

The content (filling percentage) of the ferromagnetic powder of the magnetic layer is preferably 50 to 90 mass % and more preferably 60 to 90 mass %. The components other than the ferromagnetic powder of the magnetic layer are at least a binding agent and one or more kinds of additives may be arbitrarily included. A high filling percentage of the ferromagnetic powder in the magnetic layer is preferable from a viewpoint of improvement recording density.

Binding Agent

The magnetic tape is a coating type magnetic tape, and the magnetic layer includes a binding agent together with the ferromagnetic powder. As the binding agent, one or more kinds of resin are used. The resin may be a homopolymer or a copolymer. As the binding agent, various resins normally used as a binding agent of the coating type magnetic recording medium can be used. For example, as the binding agent, a resin selected from a polyurethane resin, a polyester resin, a polyamide resin, a vinyl chloride resin, an acrylic resin obtained by copolymerizing styrene, acrylonitrile, or methyl methacrylate, a cellulose resin such as nitrocellulose, an epoxy resin, a phenoxy resin, and a polyvinylalkylal resin such as polyvinyl acetal or polyvinyl butyral can be used alone or a plurality of resins can be mixed with each other to be used. Among these, a polyurethane resin, an acrylic resin, a cellulose resin, and a vinyl chloride resin are preferable. These resins can be used as the binding agent even in the non-magnetic layer and/or a back coating layer which will be described later. For the binding agent described above, description disclosed in paragraphs 0028 to 0031 of JP2010-24113A can be referred to. An average molecular weight of the resin used as the binding agent can be, for example, 10,000 to 200,000 as a weight-average molecular weight. The weight-average molecular weight of the invention and the specification is a value obtained by performing polystyrene conversion of a value measured by gel permeation chromatography (GPC). As the measurement conditions, the following conditions can be used. The weight-average molecular weight shown in examples which will be described later is a value obtained by performing polystyrene conversion of a value measured under the following measurement conditions.

GPC device: HLC-8120 (manufactured by Tosoh Corporation)

Column: TSK gel Multipore HXL-M (manufactured by Tosoh Corporation, 7.8 mmID (inner diameter)×30.0 cm)

Eluent: Tetrahydrofuran (THF)

In addition, a curing agent can also be used together with the binding agent. As the curing agent, in one aspect, a thermosetting compound which is a compound in which a curing reaction (crosslinking reaction) proceeds due to heating can be used, and in another aspect, a photocurable compound in which a curing reaction (crosslinking reaction) proceeds due to light irradiation can be used. At least a part of the curing agent is included in the magnetic layer in a state of being reacted (crosslinked) with other components such as the binding agent, by proceeding the curing reaction in the magnetic layer forming step. The preferred curing agent is a thermosetting compound, polyisocyanate is suitable. For details of the polyisocyanate, descriptions disclosed in paragraphs 0124 and 0125 of JP2011-216149A can be referred to, for example. The amount of the curing agent can be, for example, 0 to 80.0 parts by mass with respect to 100.0 parts by mass of the binding agent in the magnetic layer forming composition, and is preferably 50.0 to 80.0 parts by mass, from a viewpoint of improvement of strength of each layer such as the magnetic layer.

Other Components

The magnetic layer includes ferromagnetic powder and a binding agent and if necessary, may include one or more kinds of additives. As the additives, the curing agent described above is used as an example. In addition, examples of the additive which can be included in the magnetic layer include non-magnetic powder, a lubricant, a dispersing agent, a dispersing assistant, an antifungal agent, an antistatic agent, an antioxidant, and carbon black. As the additives, a commercially available product can be suitably selected and used according to the desired properties.

The magnetic layer preferably includes one or two or more kinds of non-magnetic powders. As the non-magnetic powder, non-magnetic powder (hereinafter, referred to as a “projection formation agent”) which can function as a projection formation agent which forms projections suitably protruding from the surface of the magnetic layer can be used. The projection formation agent is a component which can contribute to the control of friction properties of the surface of the magnetic layer of the magnetic tape. The magnetic layer may include non-magnetic powder (hereinafter, referred to as an “abrasive”) which can function as an abrasive can be used. The magnetic layer of the magnetic tape preferably includes at least one of the projection formation agent or the abrasive and more preferably includes both thereof.

As the projection formation agent, various non-magnetic powders normally used as a projection formation agent can be used. These may be inorganic substances or organic substances. In one aspect, from a viewpoint of homogenization of friction properties, particle size distribution of the projection formation agent is not polydispersion having a plurality of peaks in the distribution and is preferably monodisperse showing a single peak. From a viewpoint of availability of monodisperse particles, the projection formation agent is preferably powder of inorganic substances (inorganic powder). Examples of the inorganic powder include powder of inorganic oxide such as metal oxide, metal carbonate, metal sulfate, metal nitride, metal carbide, and metal sulfide, and powder of inorganic oxide is preferable. The projection formation agent is more preferably colloidal particles and even more preferably inorganic oxide colloidal particles. In addition, from a viewpoint of availability of monodisperse particles, the inorganic oxide configuring the inorganic oxide colloidal particles are preferably silicon dioxide (silica). The inorganic oxide colloidal particles are more preferably colloidal silica (silica colloidal particles). In the invention and the specification, the “colloidal particles” are particles which are not precipitated and dispersed to generate a colloidal dispersion, in a case where 1 g of the particles is added to 100 mL of at least one organic solvent of at least methyl ethyl ketone, cyclohexanone, toluene, or ethyl acetate, or a mixed solvent including two or more kinds of the solvent described above at an arbitrary mixing ratio. The average particle size of the colloidal particles is a value obtained by a method disclosed in a paragraph 0015 of JP2011-048878A as a measurement method of an average particle diameter. In addition, in another aspect, the projection formation agent is preferably carbon black.

An average particle size of the projection formation agent is, for example, 30 to 300 nm and is preferably 40 to 200 nm.

Meanwhile, the abrasive is preferably non-magnetic powder having Mohs hardness exceeding 8 and more preferably non-magnetic powder having Mohs hardness equal to or greater than 9. A maximum value of Mobs hardness is 10 of diamond. Specifically, powders of alumina (Al2O3), silicon carbide, boron carbide (B4C), SiO2, TiC, chromium oxide (Cr2O3), cerium oxide, zirconium oxide (ZrO2), iron oxide, diamond, and the like can be used, and among these, alumina powder such as α-alumina and silicon carbide powder are preferable. In addition, regarding the particle size of the abrasive, a specific surface area which is an index for the particle size is, for example, equal to or greater than 14 m2/g, and is preferably 16 m2/g and more preferably 18 m2/g. Further, the specific surface area of the abrasive can be, for example, equal to or smaller than 40 m2/g. The specific surface area is a value obtained by a nitrogen adsorption method (also referred to as a Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) 1 point method), and is a value measured regarding primary particles. Hereinafter, the specific surface area obtained by such a method is also referred to as a BET specific surface area.

In addition, from a viewpoint that the projection formation agent and the abrasive can exhibit the functions thereof in more excellent manner, the content of the projection formation agent of the magnetic layer is preferably 1.0 to 4.0 parts by mass and more preferably 1.5 to 3.5 parts by mass with respect to 100.0 parts by mass of the ferromagnetic powder. Meanwhile, the content of the magnetic layer is preferably 1.0 to 20.0 parts by mass, more preferably 3.0 to 15.0 parts by mass, and even more preferably 4.0 to 10.0 parts by mass with respect to 100.0 parts by mass of the ferromagnetic powder.

As an example of the additive which can be used in the magnetic layer including the abrasive, a dispersing agent disclosed in paragraphs 0012 to 0022 of JP2013-131285A can be used as a dispersing agent for improving dispersibility of the abrasive of the magnetic layer forming composition. It is preferable to improve dispersibility of the magnetic layer forming composition of the non-magnetic powder such as an abrasive, in order to decrease the center line average surface roughness Ra measured regarding the surface of the magnetic layer.

As described above, in order to control the base friction to be equal to or smaller than 0.30, other non-magnetic powders can also be used in addition to the non-magnetic powder described above. Such non-magnetic powder preferably has Mohs hardness equal to or smaller than 8, and various non-magnetic powders normally used in the non-magnetic layer can be used. Specifically, the non-magnetic layer is as described later. As more preferred non-magnetic powder, red oxide can be used. The Mohs hardness of red oxide is approximately 6.

It is preferable that the other non-magnetic powder described above has an average particle size greater than that of the ferromagnetic powder, in the same manner as the ferromagnetic powder used with the ferromagnetic powder used with the largest proportion described above. This is because the base friction may decrease due to the protrusion formed of the other non-magnetic powder on the base portion. From a viewpoint, difference between an average particle size of the ferromagnetic powder and an average particle size of the other non-magnetic powder used therewith, acquired as “(latter average particle size)−(former average particle size)” is preferably 10 to 80 nm and more preferably 10 to 50 nm. In a case of using two or more kinds of ferromagnetic powders having different average particle sizes as the ferromagnetic powder, the ferromagnetic powder used for calculating a difference the average particle size thereof and the average particle size of the other non-magnetic powder is ferromagnetic powder used with the largest proportion among two or more kinds of ferromagnetic powders. As the other non-magnetic powder, it is also possible to use two or more kinds of non-magnetic powders having different average particle sizes. In this case, it is preferable that an average particle size of at least one of non-magnetic powder of the two or more kinds of non-magnetic powders satisfies the difference described above, it is more preferable that average particle sizes of more kinds of non-magnetic powders satisfy the difference described above, and it is even more preferable that average particle sizes of all of the non-magnetic powders satisfy the difference described above, with respect to the average particle size of the ferromagnetic powder.

From a viewpoint of controlling base friction, a mixing ratio of the ferromagnetic powder to the other non-magnetic powder (in a case of using two or more kinds of non-magnetic powders having different average particle sizes as other non-magnetic powder, the total thereof), is preferably 90.0:10.0 (former:latter) to 99.9:0.1 and more preferably 95.0:5.0 to 99.5:0.5 based on mass.

Center Line Average Surface Roughness Ra Measured Regarding Surface of Magnetic Layer

Increasing a surface smoothness of the magnetic layer in the magnetic tape causes improvement of electromagnetic conversion characteristics. Regarding the surface smoothness of the magnetic layer, the center line average surface roughness Ra measured regarding the surface of the magnetic layer can be an index.

In one aspect, the center line average surface roughness Ra measured regarding the surface of the magnetic layer of the magnetic tape is preferably equal to or smaller than 2.8 nm, more preferably equal to or smaller than 2.5 nm, even more preferably equal to or smaller than 2.3 nm, and still more preferably equal to or smaller than 2.0 nm, from a viewpoint of improving electromagnetic conversion characteristics. However, according to the studies of the inventors, it is found that, in a case where the center line average surface roughness Ra measured regarding the surface of the magnetic layer is equal to or smaller than 2.5 nm and any measures are not prepared, a decrease in resistance value of the TMR head tends to occur even more significantly. However, even a significant decrease in resistance value of the TMR head occurring in a case where the Ra is equal to or smaller than 2.5 nm can be prevented, in a case of the magnetic tape device according to one aspect of the invention. In addition, the center line average surface roughness Ra measured regarding the surface of the magnetic layer can be equal to or greater than 1.2 nm or equal to or greater than 1.3 nm. From a viewpoint of improving electromagnetic conversion characteristics, a low value of the Ra is preferable, and thus, the Ra may be lower than the values described above.

The surface smoothness of the magnetic layer, that is, the center line average surface roughness Ra measured regarding the surface of the magnetic layer can be controlled by a well-known method. For example, the surface smoothness of the magnetic layer can be controlled by adjusting a size of various powder (for example, ferromagnetic powder, non-magnetic powder, and the like) included in the magnetic layer or manufacturing conditions of the magnetic tape.

Non-Magnetic Layer

Next, the non-magnetic layer will be described. The magnetic tape may include a magnetic layer directly on a non-magnetic support, or may include a non-magnetic layer including non-magnetic powder and a binding agent between the non-magnetic support and the magnetic layer. The non-magnetic powder used in the non-magnetic layer may be powder of inorganic substances or powder of organic substances. In addition, carbon black and the like can be used. Examples of the inorganic substances include metal, metal oxide, metal carbonate, metal sulfate, metal nitride, metal carbide, and metal sulfide. These non-magnetic powder can be purchased as a commercially available product or can be manufactured by a well-known method. For details thereof, descriptions disclosed in paragraphs 0146 to 0150 of JP2011-216149A can be referred to. For carbon black which can be used in the non-magnetic layer, descriptions disclosed in paragraphs 0040 and 0041 of JP2010-24113A can be referred to. The content (filling percentage) of the non-magnetic powder of the non-magnetic layer is preferably 50 to 90 mass % and more preferably 60 to 90 mass %.

In regards to other details of a binding agent or additives of the non-magnetic layer, the well-known technology regarding the non-magnetic layer can be applied. In addition, in regards to the type and the content of the binding agent, and the type and the content of the additive, for example, the well-known technology regarding the magnetic layer can be applied.

The non-magnetic layer of the magnetic tape also includes a substantially non-magnetic layer including a small amount of ferromagnetic powder as impurities or intentionally, together with the non-magnetic powder.

Here, the substantially non-magnetic layer is a layer having a residual magnetic flux density equal to or smaller than 10 mT, a layer having coercivity equal to or smaller than 7.96 kA/m(100 Oe), or a layer having a residual magnetic flux density equal to or smaller than 10 mT and coercivity equal to or smaller than 7.96 kA/m(100 Oe). It is preferable that the non-magnetic layer does not have a residual magnetic flux density and coercivity.

Non-Magnetic Support

Next, the non-magnetic support will be described. As the non-magnetic support (hereinafter, also simply referred to as a “support”), well-known components such as polyethylene terephthalate, polyethylene naphthalate, polyamide, polyamide imide, aromatic polyamide subjected to biaxial stretching are used. Among these, polyethylene terephthalate, polyethylene naphthalate, and polyamide are preferable. Corona discharge, plasma treatment, easy-bonding treatment, or heating treatment may be performed with respect to these supports in advance.

Back Coating Layer

The magnetic tape can also include a back coating layer including non-magnetic powder and a binding agent on a surface side of the non-magnetic support opposite to the surface provided with the magnetic layer. The back coating layer preferably includes any one or both of carbon black and inorganic powder. In regards to the binding agent included in the back coating layer and various additives which can be arbitrarily included in the back coating layer, a well-known technology regarding the treatment of the magnetic layer and/or the non-magnetic layer can be applied.

Various Thickness

A thickness of the non-magnetic support is preferably 3.0 to 6.0 μm

A thickness of the magnetic layer is preferably equal to or smaller than 0.15 μm and more preferably equal to or smaller than 0.1 μm, from a viewpoint of realization of high-density recording required in recent years. The thickness of the magnetic layer is even more preferably 0.01 to 0.1 μm. The magnetic layer may be at least single layer, the magnetic layer may be separated into two or more layers having different magnetic properties, and a configuration of a well-known multilayered magnetic layer can be applied. A thickness of the magnetic layer in a case where the magnetic layer is separated into two or more layers is a total thickness of the layers.

A thickness of the non-magnetic layer is, for example, 0.1 to 1.5 μm and is preferably 0.1 to 1.0 μm.

Meanwhile, the magnetic tape is normally used to be accommodated and circulated in a magnetic tape cartridge. In order to increase recording capacity for 1 reel of the magnetic tape cartridge, it is desired to increase a total length of the magnetic tape accommodated in 1 reel of the magnetic tape cartridge. In order to increase the recording capacity, it is necessary that the magnetic tape is thinned (hereinafter, referred to as “thinning”). As one method of thinning the magnetic tape, a method of decreasing a total thickness of a magnetic layer and a non-magnetic layer of a magnetic tape including the non-magnetic layer and the magnetic layer on a non-magnetic support in this order is used. In a case where the magnetic tape includes a non-magnetic layer, the total thickness of the magnetic layer and the non-magnetic layer is preferably equal to or smaller than 1.8 μm, more preferably equal to or smaller than 1.5 μm, and even more preferably equal to or smaller than 1.1 μm, from a viewpoint of thinning the magnetic tape. According to the studies of the inventors, it is found that, in a case where the total thickness of the magnetic layer and the non-magnetic layer is equal to or smaller than 1.1 μm and any measures are not prepared, a decrease in resistance value of the TMR head tends to occur even more significantly. However, even a significant decrease in resistance value of the TMR head occurring in a case where the total thickness of the magnetic layer and the non-magnetic layer is equal to or smaller than 1.1 μm can be prevented, in a case of the magnetic tape device according to one aspect of the invention. In addition, the total thickness of the magnetic layer and the non-magnetic layer can be, for example, equal to or greater than 0.1 μm or equal to or greater than 0.2 μm.

A thickness of the back coating layer is preferably equal to or smaller than 0.9 μm and even more preferably 0.1 to 0.7 μm.

The thicknesses of various layers of the magnetic tape and the non-magnetic support can be acquired by a well-known film thickness measurement method. As an example, a cross section of the magnetic tape in a thickness direction is, for example, exposed by a well-known method of ion beams or microtome, and the exposed cross section is observed with a scan electron microscope. In the cross section observation, various thicknesses can be acquired as a thickness acquired at one position of the cross section in the thickness direction, or an arithmetical mean of thicknesses acquired at a plurality of positions of two or more positions, for example, two positions which are arbitrarily extracted. In addition, the thickness of each layer may be acquired as a designed thickness calculated according to the manufacturing conditions.

Manufacturing Method

Preparation of Each Layer Forming Composition

Each composition for forming the magnetic layer, the non-magnetic layer, or the back coating layer normally includes a solvent, together with various components described above. As the solvent, various organic solvents generally used for manufacturing a coating type magnetic recording medium can be used. Among those, from a viewpoint of solubility of the binding agent normally used in the coating type magnetic recording medium, each layer forming composition preferably includes one or more ketone solvents such as acetone, methyl ethyl ketone, methyl isobutyl ketone, diisobutyl ketone, cyclohexanone, isophorone, and tetrahydrofuran. The amount of the solvent of each layer forming composition is not particularly limited, and can be set to be the same as that of each layer forming composition of a typical coating type magnetic recording medium. In addition, steps of preparing each layer forming composition generally include at least a kneading step, a dispersing step, and a mixing step provided before and after these steps, if necessary. Each step may be divided into two or more stages. All of the raw materials used in the invention may be added at an initial stage or in a middle stage of each step. In addition, each raw material may be separately added in two or more steps. For example, in one aspect, regarding the magnetic layer forming composition, a dispersion liquid (magnetic solution) including ferromagnetic powder and a dispersion liquid (abrasive liquid) including an abrasive are separately dispersed and prepared, and these dispersion liquids are mixed with other components at the same time or in order to prepare a magnetic layer forming composition. Other descriptions for the preparation of each layer forming composition, a description disclosed in a paragraph 0065 of JP2010-231843A can also be referred to.

As described above, in one aspect, regarding the control of the base friction, a magnetic tape can be manufactured by using two or more kinds of ferromagnetic powders having different average particle sizes. That is, the magnetic layer can be formed with first ferromagnetic powder, and one or more kinds of ferromagnetic powder having an average particle size greater than that of the first ferromagnetic powder, as ferromagnetic powder. As preferred aspects of a forming method of such a magnetic layer, aspects of the following (1) to (3) can be used. A combination of two or more aspects described below is a more preferred aspect of the forming method of a magnetic layer. The first ferromagnetic powder is one kind of ferromagnetic powder among the two or more kinds of ferromagnetic powders and is preferably ferromagnetic powder used with the largest proportion described above.

(1) An average particle size of the first ferromagnetic powder is 10 to 80 nm.

(2) A difference between an average particle size of the ferromagnetic powder having an average particle size greater than that of the first ferromagnetic powder, and the average particle size of the first ferromagnetic powder is 10 to 50 nm.

(3) A mixing ratio of the first ferromagnetic powder to the ferromagnetic powder having an average particle size greater than that of the first ferromagnetic powder is 90.0:10.0 (former:latter) to 99.9:0.1 based on mass.

In another aspect, a magnetic tape can also be manufactured by using non-magnetic powder other than the abrasive and the projection formation agent, as the non-magnetic powder of the magnetic layer. That is, the magnetic layer can be formed with the other non-magnetic powder. As preferred aspects of a forming method of such a magnetic layer, aspects of the following (4) to (6) can be used. A combination of two or more aspects described below is a more preferred aspect of the forming method of a magnetic layer.

(4) An average particle size of the other non-magnetic powder is greater than an average particle size of the ferromagnetic powder.

(5) A difference between the average particle size of the ferromagnetic powder and the average particle size of the other non-magnetic powder is 10 to 80 nm.

(6) A mixing ratio of the ferromagnetic powder to the other non-magnetic powder is 90.0:10.0 (former:latter) to 99.9:0.1 based on mass.

Coating Step

The magnetic layer can be formed by directly applying the magnetic layer forming composition onto the surface of the non-magnetic support or performing multilayer coating of the magnetic layer forming composition with the non-magnetic layer forming composition in order or at the same time. The back coating layer can be formed by applying the back coating layer forming composition to the surface of the non-magnetic support opposite to a side provided with the magnetic layer (or to be provided with the magnetic layer). For details of the coating for forming each layer, a description disclosed in a paragraph 0066 of JP2010-231843A can be referred to.

Other Steps

For details of various other steps for manufacturing the magnetic tape, descriptions disclosed in paragraphs 0067 to 0070 of JP2010-231843A can be referred to. In addition, a servo pattern can also be formed in the magnetic tape by a well-known method, in order to perform head tracking servo in the magnetic tape device.

The magnetic tape described above is generally accommodated in a magnetic tape cartridge and the magnetic tape cartridge is mounted in the magnetic tape device. In the magnetic tape cartridge, the magnetic tape is generally accommodated in a cartridge main body in a state of being wound around a reel. The reel is rotatably provided in the cartridge main body. As the magnetic tape cartridge, a single reel type magnetic tape cartridge including one reel in a cartridge main body and a twin reel type magnetic tape cartridge including two reels in a cartridge main body are widely used. In a case where the single reel type magnetic tape cartridge is mounted in the magnetic tape device (drive) in order to record and/or reproduce data (magnetic signals) to the magnetic tape, the magnetic tape is drawn from the magnetic tape cartridge and wound around the reel on the drive side. A magnetic head is disposed on a magnetic tape transportation path from the magnetic tape cartridge to a winding reel. Sending and winding of the magnetic tape are performed between a reel (supply reel) on the magnetic tape cartridge side and a reel (winding reel) on the drive side. In the meantime, the magnetic head comes into contact with and slides on the surface of the magnetic layer of the magnetic tape, and accordingly, the recording and/or reproduction of the magnetic signal is performed. With respect to this, in the twin reel type magnetic tape cartridge, both reels of the supply reel and the winding reel are provided in the magnetic tape cartridge. The magnetic tape according to one aspect of the invention may be accommodated in any of single reel type magnetic tape cartridge and twin reel type magnetic tape cartridge. The configuration of the magnetic tape cartridge is well known.

Reproducing Head

The magnetic tape device includes the TMR head as the reproducing head. The TMR head is a magnetic head including a tunnel magnetoresistance effect type element (TMR element). The TMR element can play a role of detecting a change in leakage magnetic field from the magnetic tape as a change in resistance value (electric resistance) by using a tunnel magnetoresistance effect, as a reproducing element for reproducing information recorded on the magnetic tape (specifically, information recorded on the magnetic layer of the magnetic tape). By converting the detected change in resistance value into a change in voltage, the information recorded on the magnetic tape can be reproduced.

As the TMR head included in the magnetic tape device, a TMR head having a well-known configuration including a tunnel magnetoresistance effect type element (TMR element) can be used. For example, for details of the structure of the TMR head, materials of each unit configuring the TMR head, and the like, well-known technologies regarding the TMR head can be used.

The TMR head is a so-called thin film head. The TMR element included in the TMR head at least includes two electrode layers, a tunnel barrier layer, a free layer, and a fixed layer. The TMR head includes a TMR element in a state where cross sections of these layers face a side of a surface sliding on the magnetic tape. The tunnel barrier layer is positioned between the two electrode layers and the tunnel barrier layer is an insulating layer. Meanwhile, the free layer and the fixed layer are magnetic layers. The free layer is also referred to as a magnetization free layer and is a layer in which a magnetization direction changes depending on the external magnetic field. On the other hand, the fixed layer is a layer in which a magnetization direction does not change depending on the external magnetic field. The tunnel barrier layer (insulating layer) is positioned between the two electrodes, normally, and thus, even in a case where a voltage is applied, in general, a current does not flow or does not substantially flow. However, a current (tunnel current) flows by the tunnel effect depending on a magnetization direction of the free layer affected by a leakage magnetic field from the magnetic tape. The amount of a tunnel current flow changes depending on a relative angle of a magnetization direction of the fixed layer and a magnetization direction of the free layer, and as the relative angle decreases, the amount of the tunnel current flow increases. A change in amount of the tunnel current flow is detected as a change in resistance value by the tunnel magnetoresistance effect. By converting the change in resistance value into a change in voltage, the information recorded on the magnetic tape can be reproduced. For an example of the configuration of the TMR head, a description disclosed in FIG. 1 of JP2004-185676A can be referred to, for example. However, there is no limitation to the aspect shown in the drawing. FIG. 1 of JP2004-185676A shows two electrode layers and two shield layers. Here, a TMR head having a configuration in which the shield layer serves as an electrode layer is also well known and the TMR head having such a configuration can also be used. In the TMR head, a current (tunnel current) flows between the two electrodes and thereby changing electric resistance, by the tunnel magnetoresistance effect. The TMR head is a magnetic head having a CPP structure, and thus, a direction in which a current flows is a transportation direction of the magnetic tape. In the invention and the specification, the description regarding “orthogonal” includes a range of errors allowed in the technical field of the invention. For example, the range of errors means a range of less than ±10° from an exact orthogonal state, and the error from the exact orthogonal state is preferably within ±5° and more preferably within ±3°. A decrease in resistance value of the TMR head means a decrease in electric resistance measured by bringing an electric resistance measuring device into contact with a wiring connecting two electrodes, and a decrease in electric resistance between two electrodes in a state where a current does not flow. A significant decrease in electric resistance causes a decrease in electromagnetic conversion characteristics. This decrease in resistance value of the TMR head can be prevented by using a magnetic tape having the base friction equal to or smaller than 0.30 as the magnetic tape in which information to be reproduced is recorded.

The reproducing head is a magnetic head including at least the TMR element as a reproducing element for reproducing information recorded on the magnetic tape. Such a magnetic head may include or may not include an element for recording information in the magnetic tape. That is, the reproducing head and the recording head may be one magnetic head or separated magnetic heads. In addition, the magnetic head including the TMR element as a reproducing element may include a servo pattern reading element for performing head tracking servo.

Magnetic Tape Transportation Speed

The magnetic tape transportation speed of the magnetic tape device is equal to or lower than 18 m/sec. The magnetic tape transportation speed is also referred to as a running speed, and is a relative speed between the magnetic tape and the reproducing head in a case where the magnetic tape is transported (runs) in the magnetic tape device in order to reproduce information recorded on the magnetic tape. Normally, the magnetic tape transportation speed is set in a control unit of the magnetic tape device.

It is desired that the magnetic tape transportation speed is decreased to be equal to or lower than 18 m/sec, in order to prevent a deterioration of recording and reproducing characteristics. But, in a case where the magnetic tape transportation speed is equal to or lower than 18 m/sec in the magnetic tape device including the TMR head as a reproducing head, a decrease in resistance value of the TMR head occurs particularly significantly. In the magnetic tape device according to one aspect of the invention, such a decrease in resistance value can be prevented by using a magnetic tape having the base friction equal to or smaller than 0.30. The magnetic tape transportation speed is equal to or lower than 18 m/sec or may be equal to or lower than 15 m/sec or equal to or lower than 10 m/sec. The magnetic tape transportation speed can be, for example, equal to or higher than 1 m/sec.

Magnetic Reproducing Method

One aspect of the invention relates to a magnetic reproducing method including: reproducing information recorded on a magnetic tape by a reproducing head, in which a magnetic tape transportation speed during the reproducing is equal to or lower than 18 m/sec, the reproducing head is a magnetic head including a tunnel magnetoresistance effect type element as a reproducing element, the magnetic tape includes a non-magnetic support, and a magnetic layer including ferromagnetic powder and a binding agent on the non-magnetic support, a coefficient of friction measured regarding a base portion of a surface of the magnetic layer is equal to or smaller than 0.30. The reproducing of the information recorded on the magnetic tape is performed by bringing the magnetic tape into contact with the reproducing head allowing sliding while transporting (causing running of) the magnetic tape. The details of the reproducing of the magnetic reproducing method and the details of the magnetic tape and the reproducing head used in the magnetic reproducing method are as the descriptions regarding the magnetic tape device according to one aspect of the invention.

According to one aspect of the invention, a magnetic tape used in a magnetic tape device in which a TMR head is used as a reproducing head and a magnetic tape transportation speed in a case of reproducing information recorded on the magnetic tape is equal to or lower than 18 m/sec, the magnetic tape including: a magnetic layer including ferromagnetic powder and a binding agent on a non-magnetic support, in which a coefficient of friction measured regarding a base portion of a surface of the magnetic layer is equal to or smaller than 0.30 is also provided. The details of the magnetic tape are also as the descriptions regarding the magnetic tape device according to one aspect of the invention.

EXAMPLES

Hereinafter, the invention will be described with reference to examples. However, the invention is not limited to aspects shown in the examples. “Parts” and “%” in the following description mean “parts by mass” and “mass %”, unless otherwise noted.

Example 1

1. Manufacturing of Magnetic Tape

(1) Preparation of Alumina Dispersion

3.0 parts of 2,3-dihydroxynaphthalene (manufactured by Tokyo Chemical Industry Co., Ltd.), 31.3 parts of a 32% solution (solvent is a mixed solvent of methyl ethyl ketone and toluene) of a polyester polyurethane resin having a SO3Na group as a polar group (UR-4800 (amount of a polar group: 80 meq/kg) manufactured by Toyobo Co., Ltd.), and 570.0 parts of a mixed solution of methyl ethyl ketone and cyclohexanone (mass ratio of 1:1) as a solvent were mixed in 100.0 parts of alumina powder (HIT-70 manufactured by Sumitomo Chemical Co., Ltd.) having an gelatinization ratio of 65% and a BET specific surface area of 30 m2/g, and dispersed in the presence of zirconia beads by a paint shaker for 5 hours. After the dispersion, the dispersion liquid and the beads were separated by a mesh and an alumina dispersion was obtained.

(2) Magnetic Layer Forming Composition List

Magnetic Solution

Ferromagnetic hexagonal barium ferrite powder: 100.0 parts

    • Two kinds of ferromagnetic hexagonal barium ferrite powders below are used
    • Ferromagnetic hexagonal barium ferrite powder (1)
    • Average particle size and amount used: see Table 1
    • Ferromagnetic hexagonal barium ferrite powder (2)
    • Average particle size and amount used: see Table 1

SO3Na group-containing polyurethane resin: 14.0 parts

    • Weight-average molecular weight: 70,000, SO3Na group: 0.2 meq/g

Cyclohexanone: 150.0 parts

Methyl ethyl ketone: 150.0 parts

Abrasive liquid

Alumina dispersion prepared in the section (1): 6.0 parts

Silica Sol

Colloidal silica: 2.0 parts

    • Average particle size: see Table 1

Methyl ethyl ketone: 1.4 parts

Other Components

Stearic acid: 2.0 parts

Butyl stearate: 6.0 parts

Polyisocyanate (CORONATIE (registered trademark) manufactured by Nippon Polyurethane Industry Co., Ltd.): 2.5 parts

Finishing Additive Solvent

Cyclohexanone: 200.0 parts

Methyl ethyl ketone: 200.0 parts

(3) Non-Magnetic Layer Forming Composition List

Non-magnetic inorganic powder: α-iron oxide: 100.0 parts

    • Average particle size (average long axis length): 100 nm
    • Average acicular ratio: 1.9
    • BET specific surface area: 75 m2/g

Carbon black: 20.0 parts

    • Average particle size: 20 nm

SO3Na group-containing polyurethane resin: 18.0 parts

    • Weight-average molecular weight: 70,000, SO3Na group: 0.2 meq/g

Stearic acid: 1.0 part

Cyclohexanone: 300.0 parts

Methyl ethyl ketone: 300.0 parts

(4) Back Coating Layer Forming Composition List

Non-magnetic inorganic powder: α-iron oxide: 80.0 parts

    • Average particle size (average long axis length): 0.15 μm
    • Average acicular ratio: 7
    • BET specific surface area: 52 m2/g

Carbon black: 20.0 parts

    • Average particle size: 20 nm

A vinyl chloride copolymer: 13.0 parts

Sulfonic acid group-containing polyurethane resin: 6.0 parts

Phenylphosphonic acid: 3.0 parts

Stearic acid: 3.0 parts

Butyl stearate: 3.0 parts

Polyisocyanate: 5.0 parts

Cyclohexanone: 355.0 parts

Methyl ethyl ketone: 155.0 parts

(5) Preparation of Each Layer Forming Composition

The magnetic layer forming composition was prepared by the following method. The magnetic solution was prepared by dispersing (beads-dispersing) each component with a batch type vertical sand mill for 24 hours. As the dispersion beads, zirconia beads having a bead diameter of 0.5 mm were used. The prepared magnetic solution and the abrasive liquid were mixed with other components (silica sol, other components, and finishing additive solvent) and beads-dispersed for 5 minutes by using the sand mill, and a process (ultrasonic dispersion) was performed with a batch type ultrasonic device (20 kHz, 300 W) for 0.5 minutes. After that, the filtering was performed by using a filter having an average hole diameter of 0.5 μm, and the magnetic layer forming composition was prepared.

The non-magnetic layer forming composition was prepared by the following method. Each component excluding stearic acid, cyclohexanone, and methyl ethyl ketone was dispersed by using batch type vertical sand mill for 24 hours to obtain a dispersion liquid. As the dispersion beads, zirconia beads having a bead diameter of 0.1 mm were used. After that, the remaining components were added into the obtained dispersion liquid and stirred with a dissolver. The dispersion liquid obtained as described above was filtered with a filter having an average hole diameter of 0.5 μm and a non-magnetic layer forming composition was prepared.

The back coating layer forming composition was prepared by the following method. Each component excluding the lubricant (stearic acid and butyl stearate), polyisocyanate, and cyclohexanone was kneaded and diluted by an open kneader, and subjected to a dispersion process of 12 passes, with a transverse beads mill dispersing device and zirconia beads having a bead diameter of 1 mm, by setting a bead filling percentage as 80 volume %, a circumferential speed of rotor distal end as 10 m/sec, and a retention time for 1 pass as 2 minutes. After that, the remaining components were added into the obtained dispersion liquid and stirred with a dissolver. The dispersion liquid obtained as described above was filtered with a filter having an average hole diameter of 1 μm and a back coating layer forming composition was prepared.

(6) Manufacturing Method of Magnetic Tape

The non-magnetic layer forming composition prepared in the section (5) was applied to a surface of a support made of polyethylene naphthalate having a thickness of 5.0 μm so that the thickness after the drying becomes a thickness shown in Table 1, and then, the magnetic layer forming composition prepared in the section (5) was applied thereon so that the thickness after the drying becomes a thickness shown in Table 1, and a coating layer was formed. A homeotropic alignment process was performed by applying a magnetic field having a magnetic field strength of 0.3 T to the surface of the coating layer of the magnetic layer forming composition in a vertical direction while the coating layer is not dried, and then, the coating layer was dried. After that, the back coating layer forming composition prepared in the section (5) was applied to the surface of the non-magnetic support made of polyethylene naphthalate on a side opposite to the surface where the non-magnetic layer and the magnetic layer are formed, so that the thickness after the drying becomes 0.5 μm, and then drying was performed.

After that, a calender process (surface smoothing treatment) was performed with a calender roll configured of only a metal roll, at a speed of 100 m/min, linear pressure of 294 kN/m (300 kg/cm), and a calender temperature (surface temperature of a calender roll) shown in Table 1.

Then, a heating process was performed in the environment of the atmosphere temperature of 70° C. for 36 hours. After the heating process, the layer was slit to have a width of ½ inches (0.0127 meters), and a servo pattern was formed on the magnetic layer by a commercially available servo writer.

By doing so, a magnetic tape was manufactured. The thickness of each layer of the manufactured magnetic tape is acquired by the following method. It was confirmed that the thicknesses of the formed non-magnetic layer and the magnetic layer were the thicknesses shown in Table 1 and the thicknesses of the back coating layer and the non-magnetic support were the thicknesses described above.

A cross section of the magnetic tape in a thickness direction was exposed to ion beams and the exposed cross section was observed with a scanning electron microscope. Various thicknesses were obtained as an arithmetical mean of thicknesses obtained at two portions in the thickness direction in the cross section observation.

A part of the magnetic tape manufactured by the method described above was used in the evaluation described below, and the other part was used in order to measure a resistance value of the TMR head which will be described later.

The amount of the ferromagnetic hexagonal barium ferrite powder shown in Table 1 is content of each ferromagnetic hexagonal barium ferrite powder based on mass with respect to 100.0 parts by mass of a total of the ferromagnetic hexagonal barium ferrite powder. An average particle size of the ferromagnetic hexagonal barium ferrite powder shown in Table 1 is a value obtained by collecting the necessary amount from a batch of the powder used in the preparation of the magnetic tape and measuring an average particle size by the method described above. The ferromagnetic hexagonal barium ferrite powder after measuring the average particle size was used in the preparation of a magnetic solution for preparing the magnetic tape.

2. Evaluation of Physical Properties of Magnetic Tape

(1) Center Line Average Surface Roughness Ra Measured Regarding Surface of Magnetic Layer

The measurement regarding a measurement area of 40 μm×40 μm in the surface of the magnetic layer of the magnetic tape was performed with an atomic force microscope (AFM, Nanoscope 4 manufactured by Veeco Instruments, Inc.), and a center line average surface roughness Ra was acquired. A scan speed (probe movement speed) was set as 40 μm/sec and a resolution was set as 512 pixel×512 pixel.

(2) Base Friction

First, marking was performed on a measurement surface with a laser marker in advance, and an atomic force microscope (AFM) image of a portion separated from the mark by a certain distance (approximately 100 μm) was observed. The observation was performed regarding an area of a visual field of 7 μm×7 μm. At this time, marking was performed on the ARM by changing a cantilever to a hard material (single crystal silicon), so as to easily capture a scanning electron microscope (SEM) image of the same portion as will be described later. All of projections having a height equal to or greater than 15 nm from the reference surface were extracted from the AFM image observed as described above. A portion in which it is determined that projections were not present, was specified as a base portion, and the base friction was measured with TI-950 type Tribondenter manufactured by Hysitron, Inc. by the method described above.

An SEM image of the same portion as the portion observed with the AFM was observed to obtain a component map, and it was confirmed that the extracted projections having a height equal to or greater than 15 nm from the reference surface were projections formed of alumina or colloidal silica. In Examples 1 to 8, in the component map obtained with the SEM, alumina and colloidal silica were not confirmed in the base portion. Here, the component analysis was performed with the SEM, but the component analysis is not limited to being performed with the SEM, and can be performed by a well-known method such as energy dispersive X-ray spectrometry (EDS) or auger electron spectroscopy (AES).

3. Measurement of Resistance Value of Reproducing Head

The magnetic tape manufactured in the part 1. was attached to a reel tester having a width of ½ inches (0.0127 meters) fixed to a recording head and a reproducing head, and information was recorded and reproduced. As the recording head, a metal-in-gap (MIG) head (gap length of 0.15 μm, track width of 1.0 μm) was used, and the reproducing head, a TMR head (element width of 70 nm) commercially available as a reproducing head for HDD was used. A tape length of the magnetic tape was 1,000 m, and a total of 4,000 passes of the transportation (running) of the magnetic tape was performed by setting the magnetic tape transportation speed (relative speed of the magnetic tape and the magnetic head) at the time of performing reproducing as a value shown in Table 1. The reproducing head was moved in a width direction of the magnetic tape by 2.5 μm for 1 pass, a resistance value (electric resistance) of the reproducing head for transportation of 400 passes was measured, and a rate of a decrease in resistance value with respect to an initial value (resistance value at 0 pass) was obtained by the following equation.
Rate of decrease in resistance value (%)=[(initial value−resistance value after transportation of 400 passes)/initial value]×100

The measurement of the resistance value (electric resistance) was performed by bringing an electric resistance measuring device (digital multi-meter (product number: DA-50C) manufactured by Sanwa Electric Instrument Co., Ltd.) into contact with a wiring connecting two electrodes of a TMR element included in a TMR head. In a case where the calculated rate of a decrease in resistance value was equal to or greater than 30%, it was determined that a decrease in resistance value occurred. Then, a reproducing head was replaced with a new head, and transportation after 400 passes was performed and a resistance value was measured. The number of times of occurrence of a decrease in resistance value which is 1 or greater indicates a significant decrease in resistance value. In the running of 4,000 passes, in a case where the rate of a decrease in resistance value did not become equal to or greater than 30%, the number of times of occurrence of a decrease in resistance value was set as 0. In a case where the number of times of occurrence of a decrease in resistance value is 0, the maximum value of the measured rate of a decrease in resistance value is shown in Table 1.

Examples 2 to 8 and Comparative Examples 1 to 14

1. Manufacturing of Magnetic Tape

A magnetic tape was manufactured in the same manner as in Example 1, except that various conditions shown in Table 1 were changed as shown in Table 1.

2. Evaluation of Physical Properties of Magnetic Tape

Various physical properties of the manufactured magnetic tape was evaluated in the same manner as in Example 1.

3. Measurement of Resistance Value of Reproducing Head

A resistance value of the reproducing head was measured by the same method as that in Example 1, by using the manufactured magnetic tape. The magnetic tape transportation speed at the time of the reproducing was set as a value shown in Table 1. In Examples 2 to 8 and Comparative Examples 7 to 14, the TMR head which was the same as that in Example 1 was used as a reproducing head. In Comparative Examples 1 to 6, a commercially available spinvalve type GMR head (element width of 70 nm) was used as a reproducing head. This GMR head was a magnetic head having a CIP structure including two electrodes with an MR element interposed therebetween in a direction orthogonal to the transportation direction of the magnetic tape. A resistance value was measured in the same manner as in Example 1, by bringing an electric resistance measuring device into contact with a wiring connecting these two electrodes.

The results of the evaluations described above are shown in Table 1.

TABLE 1 Example 1 Example 2 Example 3 Example 4 Example 5 Example 6 Magnetic layer thickness 0.1 μm 0.1 μm 0.1 μm 0.1 μm 0.1 μm 0.1 μm Non-magnetic layer thickness 1.5 μm 1 μm 1 μm 0.5 μm 0.5 μm 0.3 μm Total thickness of magnetic layer + 1.6 μm 1.1 μm 1.1 μm 0.6 μm 0.6 μm 0.4 μm non-magnetic layer Colloidal silica average particle size 120 nm 80 nm 80 nm 80 nm 80 nm 40 nm Calender temperature 80° C. 90° C. 90° C. 90° C. 90° C. 110° C. Center line average surface roughness Ra 2.8 nm 2.0 nm 2.0 nm 2.0 nm 2.0 nm 1.5 nm Ferromagnetic hexagonal Average particle size 25 nm 25 nm 25 nm 25 nm 25 nm 25 nm barium ferrite powder (1) Amount used 99.0% 99.0% 98.7% 98.7% 98.5% 98.5% Ferromagnetic hexagonal Average particle size 55 nm 55 nm 55 nm 55 nm 55 nm 55 nm barium ferrite powder (2) Amount used 1.0% 1.0% 1.3% 1.3% 1.5% 1.5% Base friction 0.28 0.28 0.26 0.26 0.23 0.23 Reproducing head TMR TMR TMR TMR TMR TMR Magnetic tape transportation speed 18 m/sec 18 m/sec 18 m/sec 18 m/sec 18 m/sec 18 m/sec Number of times of occurrence of decrease 0 0 0 0 0 0 in resistance value (times) Rate of decrease in resistance value (%) 8 9 6 15 5 6 Comparative Comparative Comparative Comparative Example 7 Example 8 Example 1 Example 2 Example 3 Example 4 Magnetic layer thickness 0.1 μm 0.1 μm 0.1 μm 0.1 μm 0.1 μm 0.1 μm Non-magnetic layer thickness 0.3 μm 0.3 μm 1.5 μm 1.0 μm 1.0 μm 0.5 μm Total thickness of magnetic layer + 0.4 μm 0.4 μm 1.6 μm 1.1 μm 1.1 μm 0.6 μm non-magnetic layer Colloidal silica average particle size 40 nm 40 nm 120 nm 120 nm 80 nm 80 nm Calender temperature 110° C. 110° C. 80° C. 90° C. 90° C. 80° C. Center line average surface roughness Ra 1.5 nm 1.5 nm 2.8 nm 2.5 nm 2.0 nm 2.5 nm Ferromagnetic hexagonal Average particle size 25 nm 25 nm 25 nm 25 nm 25 nm 25 nm barium ferrite powder (1) Amount used 98.5% 98.5% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Ferromagnetic hexagonal Average particle size 55 nm 55 nm — — — — barium ferrite powder (2) Amount used 1.5% 1.5% — — — — Base friction 0.23 0.23 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 Reproducing head TMR TMR GMR GMR GMR GMR Magnetic tape transportation speed 10 m/sec 1 m/sec 18 m/sec 18 m/sec 18 m/sec 18 m/sec Number of times of occurrence of decrease 0 0 0 0 0 0 in resistance value (times) Rate of decrease in resistance value (%) 13 18 0 0 0 0 Comparative Comparative Comparative Comparative Comparative Comparative Example 5 Example 6 Example 7 Example 8 Example 9 Example 10 Magnetic layer thickness 0.1 μm 0.1 μm 0.1 μm 0.1 μm 0.1 μm 0.1 μm Non-magnetic layer thickness 0.5 μm 0.5 μm 1.5 μm 1.5 μm 1.0 μm 1.0 μm Total thickness of magnetic layer + 0.6 μm 0.6 μm 1.6 μm 1.6 μm 1.1 μm 1.1 μm non-magnetic layer Colloidal silica average particle size 80 nm 80 nm 120 nm 120 nm 120 nm 80 nm Calender temperature 90° C. 90° C. 80° C. 80° C. 90° C. 90° C. Center line average surface roughness Ra 2.0 nm 2.0 nm 2.8 nm 2.8 nm 2.5 nm 2.0 nm Ferromagnetic hexagonal Average particle size 25 nm 25 nm 25 nm 25 nm 25 nm 25 nm barium ferrite powder (1) Amount used 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Ferromagnetic hexagonal Average particle size — — — — — — barium ferrite powder (2) Amount used — — — — — — Base friction 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 Reproducing head GMR GMR TMR TMR TMR TMR Magnetic tape transportation speed 18 m/sec 1 m/sec 19 m/sec 18 m/sec 18 m/sec 18 m/sec Number of times of occurrence of decrease 0 0 0 1 3 7 in resistance value (times) Rate of decrease in resistance value (%) 0 0 0 — — — Comparative Comparative Comparative Comparative Example 11 Example 12 Example 13 Example 14 Magnetic layer thickness 0.1 μm 0.1 μm 0.1 μm 0.1 μm Non-magnetic layer thickness 0.5 μm 0.5 μm 0.3 μm 1.0 μm Total thickness of magnetic layer + 0.6 μm 0.6 μm 0.4 μm 1.1 μm non-magnetic layer Colloidal silica average particle size 80 nm 80 nm 40 nm 80 nm Calender temperature 80° C. 90° C. 110° C. 90° C. Center line average surface roughness Ra 2.5 nm 2.0 nm 1.5 nm 2.0 nm Ferromagnetic Average particle 25 nm 25 nm 25 nm 25 nm hexagonal barium size ferrite powder (1) Amount used 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 99.2% Ferromagnetic Average particle — — — 55 nm hexagonal barium size ferrite powder (2) Amount used — — — 0.8% Base friction 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.35 Reproducing head TMR TMR TMR TMR Magnetic tape transportation speed 18 m/sec 18 m/sec 18 m/sec 18 m/sec Number of times of occurrence of decrease 9 10 10 1 in resistance value (times) Rate of decrease in resistance value (%) — — — —

As shown in Table 1, in Comparative Examples 1 to 6 in which the GMR head was used as a reproducing head, the magnetic tape transportation speed was equal to or lower than 18 m/sec and, even in a case where the base friction of the magnetic tape exceeded 0.30, a significant decrease in resistance value of the reproducing head was not observed. In addition, in Comparative Example 7 in which the magnetic tape transportation speed exceeded 18 m/sec although the TMR head was used as a reproducing head, even in a case where the base friction of the magnetic tape exceeded 0.30, a significant decrease in resistance value of the reproducing head was not observed. On the other hand, in Comparative Examples 8 to 14 in which the TMR head was used as a reproducing head, the magnetic tape transportation speed was equal to or lower than 18 m/sec, and base friction of the magnetic tape exceeded 0.30, a significant decrease in resistance value of the reproducing head occurred.

With respect to this, in Examples 1 to 8 in which the TMR head was used as a reproducing head, the magnetic tape transportation speed was equal to or lower than 18 m/sec, and the base friction of the magnetic tape was equal to or smaller than 0.30, it was possible to prevent a significant decrease in resistance value of the reproducing head.

One aspect of the invention is effective for usage of magnetic recording for which high-sensitivity reproducing of information recorded with high density is desired.

Claims

1. A magnetic tape device comprising:

a magnetic tape; and
a reproducing head,
wherein the magnetic tape transportation speed of the magnetic tape device is equal to or lower than 18 msec,
the reproducing head is a magnetic head including a tunnel magnetoresistance effect type element as a reproducing element,
the magnetic tape includes a non-magnetic support, and a magnetic layer including ferromagnetic powder and a binding agent on the non-magnetic support,
the coefficient of friction measured regarding a base portion of a surface of the magnetic layer is 0.23 to 0.28, and
the coefficient of friction measured regarding the base portion is a value measured by allowing a diamond spherical indenter having a radius of 1 μm to reciprocate once with a load of 100 μN and a speed of 1 μm/sec on the base portion to measure a frictional force and a normal force, and calculating the value of the coefficient of friction μ from the arithmetical means of the frictional and normal forces.

2. The magnetic tape device according to claim 1,

wherein the center line average surface roughness Ra measured regarding a surface of the magnetic layer is equal to or smaller than 2.8 nm.

3. The magnetic tape device according to claim 2,

wherein the center line average surface roughness Ra is equal to or smaller than 2.5 nm.

4. The magnetic tape device according to claim 1,

wherein the magnetic tape includes a non-magnetic layer including non-magnetic powder and a binding agent between the non-magnetic support and the magnetic layer, and
the total thickness of the magnetic layer and the non-magnetic layer is equal to or smaller than 1.8 μm.

5. The magnetic tape device according to claim 4,

wherein the total thickness of the magnetic layer and the non-magnetic layer is equal to or smaller than 1.1 μm.

6. A magnetic reproducing method comprising:

reproducing information, recorded on a magnetic tape, by a reproducing head,
wherein the magnetic tape transportation speed during the reproducing is equal to or lower than 18 msec,
the reproducing head is a magnetic head including a tunnel magnetoresistance effect type element as a reproducing element,
the magnetic tape includes a non-magnetic support, and a magnetic layer including ferromagnetic powder and a binding agent on the non-magnetic support,
the coefficient of friction measured regarding a base portion of a surface of the magnetic layer is 0.23 to 0.28, and
the coefficient of friction measured regarding the base portion is a value measured by allowing a diamond spherical indenter having a radius of 1 μm to reciprocate once with a load of 100 μN and a speed of 1 μm/sec on the base portion to measure a frictional force and a normal force, and calculating the value of the coefficient of friction μ from the arithmetical means of the frictional and normal forces.

7. The magnetic reproducing method according to claim 6,

wherein the center line average surface roughness Ra measured regarding a surface of the magnetic layer is equal to or smaller than 2.8 nm.

8. The magnetic reproducing method according to claim 7,

wherein the center line average surface roughness Ra is equal to or smaller than 2.5 nm.

9. The magnetic reproducing method according to claim 6,

wherein the magnetic tape includes a non-magnetic layer including non-magnetic powder and a binding agent between the non-magnetic support and the magnetic layer, and
the total thickness of the magnetic layer and the non-magnetic layer is equal to or smaller than 1.8 μm.

10. The magnetic reproducing method according to claim 9,

wherein the total thickness of the magnetic layer and the non-magnetic layer is equal to or smaller than 1.1 μm.
Referenced Cited
U.S. Patent Documents
3966686 June 29, 1976 Asakura et al.
4112187 September 5, 1978 Asakura et al.
4425404 January 10, 1984 Suzuki et al.
4693930 September 15, 1987 Kuo et al.
4746569 May 24, 1988 Takahashi et al.
4825317 April 25, 1989 Rausch
5242752 September 7, 1993 Isobe et al.
5419938 May 30, 1995 Kagotani et al.
5445881 August 29, 1995 Irie
5474814 December 12, 1995 Komatsu et al.
5496607 March 5, 1996 Inaba et al.
5540957 July 30, 1996 Ueda
5585032 December 17, 1996 Nakata et al.
5689384 November 18, 1997 Albrecht et al.
5728454 March 17, 1998 Inaba et al.
5786074 July 28, 1998 Soui
6099957 August 8, 2000 Yamamoto et al.
6183606 February 6, 2001 Kuo et al.
6207252 March 27, 2001 Shimomura
6228461 May 8, 2001 Sueki et al.
6254964 July 3, 2001 Saito et al.
6261647 July 17, 2001 Komatsu et al.
6268043 July 31, 2001 Koizumi et al.
6496328 December 17, 2002 Dugas
6579826 June 17, 2003 Furuya et al.
6649256 November 18, 2003 Buczek et al.
6686022 February 3, 2004 Takano et al.
6770359 August 3, 2004 Masaki
6791803 September 14, 2004 Saito et al.
6835461 December 28, 2004 Yamagata et al.
6921592 July 26, 2005 Tani
6939606 September 6, 2005 Hashimoto et al.
6950269 September 27, 2005 Johnson
7014927 March 21, 2006 Sueki et al.
7029726 April 18, 2006 Chen et al.
7153366 December 26, 2006 Chen et al.
7255908 August 14, 2007 Ishikawa et al.
7511907 March 31, 2009 Dugas et al.
7515383 April 7, 2009 Saito et al.
7803471 September 28, 2010 Ota et al.
7839599 November 23, 2010 Bui et al.
8000057 August 16, 2011 Bui et al.
8524108 September 3, 2013 Hattori
8535817 September 17, 2013 Imaoka
8576510 November 5, 2013 Cherubini et al.
8681451 March 25, 2014 Harasawa et al.
9105294 August 11, 2015 Jensen et al.
9311946 April 12, 2016 Tanaka et al.
9495985 November 15, 2016 Xia et al.
9530444 December 27, 2016 Kasada
9542967 January 10, 2017 Sekiguchi et al.
9564161 February 7, 2017 Cherubini et al.
9601146 March 21, 2017 Kasada et al.
9704425 July 11, 2017 Zhang et al.
9704525 July 11, 2017 Kasada
9704527 July 11, 2017 Kasada
9711174 July 18, 2017 Kasada et al.
9721605 August 1, 2017 Oyanagi et al.
9721606 August 1, 2017 Kasada
9721607 August 1, 2017 Tada et al.
9748026 August 29, 2017 Shirata
9773519 September 26, 2017 Kasada et al.
9779772 October 3, 2017 Kasada et al.
9837116 December 5, 2017 Ozawa et al.
9959894 May 1, 2018 Omura
9972351 May 15, 2018 Kaneko et al.
9978414 May 22, 2018 Kaneko et al.
9984710 May 29, 2018 Kasada
9984716 May 29, 2018 Kaneko et al.
10008230 June 26, 2018 Ozawa et al.
10026430 July 17, 2018 Kasada
10026433 July 17, 2018 Kasada et al.
10026434 July 17, 2018 Oyanagi et al.
10026435 July 17, 2018 Kasada et al.
10062403 August 28, 2018 Kasada et al.
10074393 September 11, 2018 Kaneko et al.
10134433 November 20, 2018 Kasada et al.
20010038928 November 8, 2001 Nakamigawa et al.
20010053458 December 20, 2001 Suzuki et al.
20020072472 June 13, 2002 Furuya et al.
20020122339 September 5, 2002 Takano et al.
20030059649 March 27, 2003 Saliba et al.
20030091866 May 15, 2003 Ejiri et al.
20030124386 July 3, 2003 Masaki
20030170498 September 11, 2003 Inoue
20040018388 January 29, 2004 Kitamura et al.
20040053074 March 18, 2004 Jingu et al.
20040197605 October 7, 2004 Seki et al.
20040213948 October 28, 2004 Saito et al.
20040218304 November 4, 2004 Goker et al.
20050057838 March 17, 2005 Ohtsu
20050153170 July 14, 2005 Inoue et al.
20050196645 September 8, 2005 Doi et al.
20050260456 November 24, 2005 Hanai et al.
20050260459 November 24, 2005 Hanai et al.
20050264935 December 1, 2005 Sueki
20060008681 January 12, 2006 Hashimoto et al.
20060035114 February 16, 2006 Kuse et al.
20060056095 March 16, 2006 Saitou
20060068232 March 30, 2006 Mikamo et al.
20060232883 October 19, 2006 Biskeborn
20070020490 January 25, 2007 Harasawa et al.
20070224456 September 27, 2007 Murao et al.
20070230054 October 4, 2007 Takeda et al.
20070231606 October 4, 2007 Hanai
20080144211 June 19, 2008 Weber et al.
20080152956 June 26, 2008 Murayama et al.
20080174897 July 24, 2008 Bates et al.
20080297950 December 4, 2008 Noguchi et al.
20080311308 December 18, 2008 Lee et al.
20090027812 January 29, 2009 Noguchi et al.
20090087689 April 2, 2009 Doushita et al.
20090161249 June 25, 2009 Takayama et al.
20090162701 June 25, 2009 Jensen et al.
20100000966 January 7, 2010 Kamata et al.
20100035086 February 11, 2010 Inoue et al.
20100035088 February 11, 2010 Inoue
20100053810 March 4, 2010 Biskeborn et al.
20100081011 April 1, 2010 Nakamura
20100227201 September 9, 2010 Sasaki et al.
20100246073 September 30, 2010 Katayama
20110003241 January 6, 2011 Kaneko et al.
20110051280 March 3, 2011 Karp et al.
20110052908 March 3, 2011 Imaoka
20110151281 June 23, 2011 Inoue
20110244272 October 6, 2011 Suzuki et al.
20120045664 February 23, 2012 Tanaka et al.
20120177951 July 12, 2012 Yamazaki et al.
20120183811 July 19, 2012 Hattori et al.
20120196156 August 2, 2012 Suzuki
20120243120 September 27, 2012 Harasawa et al.
20120244387 September 27, 2012 Mori et al.
20120251845 October 4, 2012 Wang et al.
20130029183 January 31, 2013 Omura et al.
20130084470 April 4, 2013 Hattori et al.
20130088794 April 11, 2013 Cherubini et al.
20130256584 October 3, 2013 Yamazaki et al.
20130260179 October 3, 2013 Kasada et al.
20130279040 October 24, 2013 Cideciyan et al.
20130286510 October 31, 2013 Rothermel et al.
20140011055 January 9, 2014 Suzuki et al.
20140130067 May 8, 2014 Madison et al.
20140139944 May 22, 2014 Johnson et al.
20140272474 September 18, 2014 Kasada
20140295214 October 2, 2014 Tada et al.
20140342189 November 20, 2014 Tachibana et al.
20140366990 December 18, 2014 Lai et al.
20150043101 February 12, 2015 Biskeborn et al.
20150098149 April 9, 2015 Bates et al.
20150111066 April 23, 2015 Terakawa et al.
20150123026 May 7, 2015 Masada et al.
20150380036 December 31, 2015 Kasada et al.
20160061447 March 3, 2016 Kobayashi
20160064025 March 3, 2016 Kurokawa et al.
20160092315 March 31, 2016 Ashida et al.
20160093321 March 31, 2016 Aoshima et al.
20160093322 March 31, 2016 Kasada
20160093323 March 31, 2016 Omura
20160180875 June 23, 2016 Tanaka et al.
20160189739 June 30, 2016 Kasada et al.
20160189740 June 30, 2016 Oyanagi et al.
20160247530 August 25, 2016 Kasada
20160260449 September 8, 2016 Ahmad et al.
20160276076 September 22, 2016 Kasada
20170032812 February 2, 2017 Kasada
20170053669 February 23, 2017 Kasada
20170053670 February 23, 2017 Oyanagi et al.
20170053671 February 23, 2017 Kasada et al.
20170058227 March 2, 2017 Kondo
20170092315 March 30, 2017 Ozawa et al.
20170130156 May 11, 2017 Kondo
20170178675 June 22, 2017 Kasada
20170178676 June 22, 2017 Kasada
20170178677 June 22, 2017 Kasada
20170186456 June 29, 2017 Tada et al.
20170186460 June 29, 2017 Kasada et al.
20170221516 August 3, 2017 Oyanagi et al.
20170221517 August 3, 2017 Ozawa et al.
20170249963 August 31, 2017 Oyanagi et al.
20170249966 August 31, 2017 Tachibana et al.
20170287517 October 5, 2017 Hosoya et al.
20170355022 December 14, 2017 Kaneko et al.
20170358318 December 14, 2017 Kasada et al.
20170372726 December 28, 2017 Kasada et al.
20170372727 December 28, 2017 Kasada et al.
20170372736 December 28, 2017 Kaneko et al.
20170372737 December 28, 2017 Oyanagi et al.
20170372738 December 28, 2017 Kasada
20170372739 December 28, 2017 Ozawa et al.
20170372740 December 28, 2017 Ozawa et al.
20170372741 December 28, 2017 Kurokawa et al.
20170372742 December 28, 2017 Kaneko et al.
20170372743 December 28, 2017 Kasada et al.
20170372744 December 28, 2017 Ozawa et al.
20180061446 March 1, 2018 Kasada
20180061447 March 1, 2018 Kasada
20180082710 March 22, 2018 Tada et al.
20180137887 May 17, 2018 Sekiguchi et al.
20180182417 June 28, 2018 Kaneko
20180182422 June 28, 2018 Kawakami et al.
20180182425 June 28, 2018 Kasada et al.
20180182427 June 28, 2018 Kasada et al.
20180182429 June 28, 2018 Kasada et al.
20180182430 June 28, 2018 Ozawa et al.
20180240475 August 23, 2018 Kasada
20180240476 August 23, 2018 Kasada et al.
20180240478 August 23, 2018 Kasada et al.
20180240479 August 23, 2018 Kasada et al.
20180240481 August 23, 2018 Kasada et al.
20180240488 August 23, 2018 Kasada
20180240489 August 23, 2018 Kasada et al.
20180240490 August 23, 2018 Kurokawa et al.
20180240491 August 23, 2018 Ozawa et al.
20180240492 August 23, 2018 Kasada
20180240493 August 23, 2018 Tada et al.
20180240494 August 23, 2018 Kurokawa et al.
20180240495 August 23, 2018 Kasada
20180286439 October 4, 2018 Ozawa et al.
20180286442 October 4, 2018 Ozawa et al.
20180286443 October 4, 2018 Ozawa et al.
20180286444 October 4, 2018 Kasada et al.
20180286446 October 4, 2018 Ozawa et al.
20180286447 October 4, 2018 Ozawa et al.
20180286448 October 4, 2018 Ozawa et al.
20180286449 October 4, 2018 Kasada et al.
20180286450 October 4, 2018 Kasada et al.
20180286451 October 4, 2018 Ozawa et al.
20180286452 October 4, 2018 Ozawa et al.
20180286453 October 4, 2018 Kasada et al.
20180301165 October 18, 2018 Oyanagi et al.
20180350400 December 6, 2018 Kaneko et al.
20180374507 December 27, 2018 Kasada
20190027167 January 24, 2019 Tada et al.
20190027168 January 24, 2019 Kasada et al.
20190027171 January 24, 2019 Kasada
20190027172 January 24, 2019 Kasada
20190027174 January 24, 2019 Tada et al.
20190027175 January 24, 2019 Kurokawa et al.
20190027176 January 24, 2019 Kurokawa et al.
20190027177 January 24, 2019 Kasada
20190027178 January 24, 2019 Kasada
20190027179 January 24, 2019 Ozawa et al.
20190027180 January 24, 2019 Kasada et al.
20190027181 January 24, 2019 Ozawa et al.
20190051325 February 14, 2019 Kasada et al.
20190088278 March 21, 2019 Kasada et al.
20190096437 March 28, 2019 Ozawa et al.
20190103130 April 4, 2019 Kasada et al.
20190103134 April 4, 2019 Kasada et al.
Foreign Patent Documents
101 46 429 March 2002 DE
2495356 April 2013 GB
61-11924 January 1986 JP
61-139923 June 1986 JP
61-139932 June 1986 JP
63-129519 June 1988 JP
63-249932 October 1988 JP
64-60819 March 1989 JP
5-258283 October 1993 JP
5-298653 November 1993 JP
7-57242 March 1995 JP
11-110743 April 1999 JP
11-175949 July 1999 JP
11-273051 October 1999 JP
2000-251240 September 2000 JP
2002-157726 May 2002 JP
2002-329605 November 2002 JP
2002-367142 December 2002 JP
2002-367318 December 2002 JP
2003-77116 March 2003 JP
2003-323710 November 2003 JP
2004-005820 January 2004 JP
2004-133997 April 2004 JP
2004-185676 July 2004 JP
2005-243063 September 2005 JP
2005-243162 September 2005 JP
2006-92672 April 2006 JP
2006-286114 October 2006 JP
2007-273039 October 2007 JP
2007-287310 November 2007 JP
2007-297427 November 2007 JP
2008-243317 October 2008 JP
2009-283082 December 2009 JP
2010-49731 March 2010 JP
2011-48878 March 2011 JP
2011-210288 October 2011 JP
2011-225417 November 2011 JP
2012-38367 February 2012 JP
2012-043495 March 2012 JP
2012-203955 October 2012 JP
2013-77360 April 2013 JP
2014-15453 January 2014 JP
2014-179149 September 2014 JP
2015-39801 March 2015 JP
2016-15183 January 2016 JP
Other references
  • Office Action dated Dec. 25, 2018 in Japanese Application No. 2015-245144.
  • Office Action dated Dec. 25, 2018 in Japanese Application No. 2015-245145.
  • Office Action dated Dec. 25, 2018 in Japanese Application No. 2015-254192.
  • Office Action dated Dec. 31, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 16/009,603.
  • Office Action dated Apr. 26, 2017 which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 15/388,864.
  • Office Action dated Aug. 10, 2017, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 14/870,618.
  • Office Action dated Aug. 3, 2018 which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 15/388,911.
  • Office Action dated Feb. 4, 2016 which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 14/753,227.
  • Office Action dated Jul. 6, 2018, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 15/848,173.
  • Office Action dated Jun. 7, 2018 which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 15/380,309.
  • Office Action dated May 2, 2018, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 15/280,195.
  • Office Action dated May 4, 2018, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 15/422,821.
  • Office Action dated May 4, 2018, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 15/625,428.
  • Office Action dated May 7, 2018, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 15/624,792.
  • Office Action dated May 7, 2018, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 15/624,897.
  • Office Action dated May 7, 2018, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 15/626,832.
  • Office Action dated Nov. 16, 2016 which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 15/072,550.
  • Office Action dated Oct. 12, 2018, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 15/626,355.
  • Office Action dated Oct. 12, 2018, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 15/627,696.
  • Office Action dated Oct. 15, 2018, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 15/619,012.
  • Office Action dated Oct. 22, 2018, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 15/854,439.
  • Office Action dated Oct. 9, 2018, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 15/628,814.
  • Office Action dated Sep. 24, 2018, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 15/690,400.
  • Office Action dated Sep. 27, 2018, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 15/690,906.
  • Office Action dated Sep. 27, 2018, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 15/854,383.
  • Communication dated Aug. 23, 2018 from the United States Patent and Trademark Office in U.S. Appl. No. 15/614,876.
  • Communication dated Aug. 23, 2018 from the United States Patent and Trademark Office in U.S. Appl. No. 15/621,464.
  • Communication dated Aug. 23, 2018 from the United States Patent and Trademark Office in U.S. Appl. No. 15/626,720.
  • Communication dated Aug. 24, 2018 from the United States Patent and Trademark Office in U.S. Appl. No. 15/620,916.
  • Communication dated Aug. 3, 2018 from the United States Patent and Trademark Office in U.S. Appl. No. 15/380,336.
  • Communication dated Dec. 5, 2016 from the United States Patent and Trademark Office in U.S. Appl. No. 14/978,834.
  • Communication dated Dec. 6, 2016 from the United States Patent and Trademark Office in U.S. Appl. No. 14/757,555.
  • Communication dated Jun. 9, 2017 which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 15/388,864.
  • Communication dated May 30, 2018 which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 15/388,911.
  • Communication dated Nov. 18, 2016 which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 14/753,227.
  • Final Office Action dated Aug. 15, 2016 which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 14/753,227.
  • Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 25, 2017 which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 15/072,550.
  • Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 27, 2017, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 15/052,115.
  • Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 5, 2018, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 14/867,752.
  • Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 28, 2018, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 15/422,821.
  • Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 30, 2017, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 15/466,143.
  • Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 6, 2018, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 15/920,768.
  • Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 9, 2018, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 15/920,563.
  • Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 2, 2016 which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 14/753,227.
  • Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 3, 2018, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 15/920,518.
  • Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 4, 2018, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 15/625,428.
  • Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 14, 2018, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 14/870,618.
  • Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 12, 2017 which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 15/388,864.
  • Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 13, 2018, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 15/920,782.
  • Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 2, 2017, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 15/218,190.
  • Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 28, 2017, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 15/464,991.
  • Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 14, 2018, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 15/854,474.
  • Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 16, 2018 which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 15/854,410.
  • Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 19, 2018, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 15/378,907.
  • Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 21, 2018, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 15/241,286.
  • Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 21, 2018, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 15/241,297.
  • Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 27, 2018, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 15/241,631.
  • Notice of Allowance dated May 10, 2018 which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 15/615,871.
  • Notice of Allowance dated May 8, 2017, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 14/757,555.
  • Notice of Allowance dated May 8, 2017, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 14/978,834.
  • Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 11, 2018, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 15/380,336.
  • Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 11, 2018, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 15/624,792.
  • Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 11, 2018, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 15/624,897.
  • Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 12, 2018, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 15/626,832.
  • Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 6, 2016, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 14/209,065.
  • Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 4, 2018, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 15/625,428.
  • Office Action dated Dec. 14, 2018, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 15/920,517.
  • Office Action dated Dec. 17, 2018, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 15/920,515.
  • Office Action dated Dec. 17, 2018, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 15/920,533.
  • Office Action dated Dec. 17, 2018, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 15/920,538.
  • Office Action dated Dec. 17, 2018, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 15/920,544.
  • Office Action dated Dec. 20, 2018, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 15/900,164.
  • Office Action dated Dec. 21, 2018, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 15/900,230.
  • Office Action dated Feb. 25, 2016, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 14/867,752.
  • Office Action dated Jan. 27, 2015 from the Japanese Patent Office in Japanese Application No. 2013-053543.
  • Office Action dated Jan. 31, 2018, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 14/867,752.
  • Office Action dated Jul. 3, 2018, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 15/920,518.
  • Office Action dated Jul. 6, 2015, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 14/209,065.
  • Office Action dated Mar. 13, 2015, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 14/209,065.
  • Office Action dated Mar. 16, 2017, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 14/867,752.
  • Office Action dated Mar. 24, 2016, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 14/209,065.
  • Office Action dated Nov. 28, 2018, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 15/899,587.
  • Office Action dated Nov. 28, 2018, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 15/900,080.
  • Office Action dated Nov. 28, 2018, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 15/900,144.
  • Office Action dated Nov. 29, 2018, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 15/380,309.
  • Office Action dated Nov. 29, 2018, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 15/422,821.
  • Office Action dated Nov. 8, 2016 from the Japanese Patent Office in Japanese Application No. 2014-199022.
  • Office Action dated Oct. 15, 2018, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 15/854,403.
  • Office Action dated Oct. 19, 2016, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 14/867,752.
  • Office Action dated Oct. 3, 2018, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 15/280,195.
  • Office Action dated Oct. 5, 2017, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 15/241,286.
  • Office Action dated Oct. 5, 2017, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 15/241,297.
  • Office Action dated Oct. 5, 2017, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 15/241,631.
  • Office Action dated Oct. 5, 2017, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 15/378,907.
  • Office Action dated Sep. 10, 2015, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 14/209,065.
  • Office Action dated Sep. 19, 2014, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 14/209,065.
  • Office Action dated Sep. 26, 2017 issued by the Japanese Patent Office in JP Appln. No. 2014-265723.
  • Office Action dated Sep. 26, 2017 issued by the Japanese Patent Office in JP Appln. No. 2015-249264.
  • Office Action dated Sep. 7, 2017, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 14/867,752.
  • Office Action dated May 4, 2018 which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 15/422,944.
  • Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 11, 2018, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 15/422,944.
  • Office Action dated Apr. 19, 2018, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 15/854,438.
  • Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 24, 2018, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 15/854,438.
  • Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 10, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/848,173.
  • Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 17, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/422,944.
  • Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 17, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/626,720.
  • Office Action dated Dec. 20, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/900,106.
  • Office Action dated Jan. 10, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/899,430.
  • Office Action dated Jan. 29, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/614,876.
  • Office Action dated Jan. 30, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/620,916.
  • Office Action dated Nov. 14, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 16/100,289.
  • Office Action dated Feb. 5, 2019 in Japanese Application No. 2016-117339.
  • Office Action dated Feb. 5, 2019 in Japanese Application No. 2016-123205.
  • Office Action dated Feb. 5, 2019 in Japanese Application No. 2016-169871.
  • Office Action dated Feb. 7, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/621,464.
  • Office Action dated Nov. 19, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/900,141.
  • Office Action dated Dec. 21, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/900,160.
  • Office Action dated Dec. 19, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/900,345.
  • Office Action dated Dec. 19, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/900,379.
  • Office Action dated Dec. 7, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/920,592.
  • Office Action dated Dec. 20, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/900,242.
  • Office Action dated Dec. 21, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/920,616.
  • Office Action dated Dec. 27, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/900,334.
  • Office Action dated Feb. 21, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/854,383.
  • Office Action dated Feb. 26, 2019 in Japanese Application No. 2016-123207.
  • Office Action dated Feb. 26, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/380,336.
  • Office Action dated Feb. 26, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/624,792.
  • Office Action dated Feb. 26, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/624,897.
  • Office Action dated Feb. 26, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/626,832.
  • Office Action dated Feb. 28, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/920,518.
  • Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 5, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 16/009,603.
  • Office Action dated Mar. 5, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/443,026.
  • Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 16, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/625,428.
  • Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 13, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 16/100,289.
  • Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 18, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/626,355.
  • Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 18, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/628,814.
  • Office Action dated Apr. 15, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 16/182,083.
  • Office Action dated Apr. 16, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 16/232,165.
  • Office Action dated Feb. 5, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 16/038,339.
  • Office Action dated Mar. 15, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/280,195.
  • Office Action dated Mar. 15, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/619,012.
  • Office Action dated Mar. 15, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/627,696.
  • Office Action dated Mar. 15, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/690,906.
  • Office Action dated Mar. 18, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/442,961.
  • Office Action dated Mar. 19, 2019 in Japanese Application No. 2016-116261.
  • Office Action dated Mar. 19, 2019 in Japanese Application No. 2016-124515.
  • Office Action dated Mar. 19, 2019 in Japanese Application No. 2016-124529.
  • Office Action dated Mar. 19, 2019 in Japanese Application No. 2016-124932.
  • Office Action dated Mar. 19, 2019 in Japanese Application No. 2016-124933.
  • Office Action dated Mar. 19, 2019 in Japanese Application No. 2016-124935.
  • Office Action dated Mar. 19, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/443,094.
  • Office Action dated Mar. 21, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/900,144.
  • Office Action dated Mar. 21, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 16/160,377.
  • Office Action dated Mar. 27, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/690,400.
  • Office Action dated Mar. 7, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/854,439.
  • “Introduction to TMR Magnetic Sensors”, Anonymous, Mar. 12, 2015, MR Sensor Technology, pp. 1-5 (Year: 2015).
  • Office Action dated Mar. 6, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/854,403.
  • Office Action dated Apr. 23, 2019 in Japanese Application No. 2016-169851.
  • Office Action dated Apr. 23, 2019 in Japanese Application No. 2016-182230.
  • Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 30, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/380,309.
Patent History
Patent number: 10325623
Type: Grant
Filed: Dec 26, 2017
Date of Patent: Jun 18, 2019
Patent Publication Number: 20180182428
Assignee: FUJIFILM Corporation (Minato-Ku, Tokyo)
Inventors: Norihito Kasada (Minami-ashigara), Eiki Ozawa (Minami-ashigara), Tetsuya Kaneko (Minami-ashigara)
Primary Examiner: William J Klimowicz
Application Number: 15/854,409
Classifications
Current U.S. Class: Applying Superposed Diverse Coating Or Coating A Coated Base (427/131)
International Classification: G11B 5/78 (20060101); G11B 15/18 (20060101); G11B 5/708 (20060101); G11B 5/39 (20060101); G11B 5/70 (20060101);