System and process for color-balancing a series of oblique images

Image processing systems and methods are disclosed, including an image processing system comprising a computer running image processing software causing the computer to: divide an oblique aerial image into a plurality of sections, choose reference aerial image(s), having a consistent color distribution, for a first section and a second section; create a color-balancing transformation for the first and second sections of the oblique aerial image such that the first color distribution of the first section matches the consistent color distribution of the chosen reference aerial image and the second color distribution of the second section matches the consistent color distribution of the chosen reference aerial image; color-balance pixel(s) in the first and section sections of the oblique aerial image, such that at least one color-balancing transformation of the first and second sections matches the consistent color distribution of the reference aerial image(s).

Skip to: Description  ·  Claims  ·  References Cited  · Patent History  ·  Patent History
Description
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. Ser. No. 16/191,232, filed Nov. 14, 2018; which is a continuation of U.S. Ser. No. 15/357,490, filed Nov. 21, 2016, now abandoned; which is a continuation of U.S. Ser. No. 14/632,732, filed Feb. 26, 2015, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,503,615; which is a continuation of U.S. Ser. No. 14/153,772, filed Jan. 13, 2014, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,971,624; which is a continuation of U.S. Ser. No. 13/181,259, filed Jul. 12, 2011, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,649,596 issued Feb. 11, 2014, which is a continuation of U.S. Ser. No. 11/871,740, filed on Oct. 12, 2007, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,991,226 issued Aug. 2, 2011; the entire contents of all of which are hereby expressly incorporated herein by reference.

STATEMENT REGARDING FEDERALLY SPONSORED RESEARCH OR DEVELOPMENT

Not Applicable.

THE NAMES OF THE PARTIES TO A JOINT RESEARCH AGREEMENT

Not Applicable.

REFERENCE TO A “SEQUENCE LISTING,” A TABLE, OR A COMPUTER PROGRAM LISTING APPENDIX SUBMITTED ON A COMPACT DISC AND AN INCORPORATION-BY-REFERENCE OF THE MATERIAL ON THE COMPACT DISC (SEE § 1.52(E)(5)). THE TOTAL NUMBER OF COMPACT DISCS INCLUDING DUPLICATES AND THE FILES ON EACH COMPACT DISC SHALL BE SPECIFIED

Not Applicable.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

In the remote sensing/aerial imaging industry, imagery is used to capture views of a geographic area and be able to measure objects and structures within the images as well as to be able to determine geographic locations of points within the image. These are generally referred to as “geo-referenced images” and come in two basic categories:

1. Captured Imagery—these images have the appearance as they were captured by the camera or sensor employed.

2. Projected Imagery—these images have been processed and converted such that they confirm to a mathematical projection.

All imagery starts as captured imagery, but as most software cannot geo-reference captured imagery, that imagery is then reprocessed to create the projected imagery. The most common form of projected imagery is the ortho-rectified image. This process aligns the image to an orthogonal or rectilinear grid (composed of rectangles). The input image used to create an ortho-rectified image is a nadir image—that is, an image captured with the camera pointing straight down.

In addition to capturing an image with the camera pointing straight down, it is possible to capture an image with the camera pointing at an oblique angle. The resulting imagery is generally referred to as an “oblique image” or as an “oblique aerial image.” The capture of oblique aerial images presents additional challenges compared to the capture of nadir images, generally due to the introduction of the oblique angle.

An example of a system that captures both nadir and oblique images is shown in FIG. 1. Airplane 10 is flying over the Earth 12 and capturing images utilizing three cameras 14a, 14b and 14c. FIG. 1 also illustrates the sun 16 positioned in a northern hemisphere orientation. The camera 14a is shown directed in a southern orientation generally towards the sun 16, the camera 14b is shown directed straight down, and the camera 14c is shown directed in a northern orientation generally away from the sun 16. The cameras 14a and 14c capture “oblique images”, while the camera 14b captures “nadir images”.

The oblique images present a more natural appearance than a nadir image because they show not just the roofs, as is the case of a nadir image, but also the sides of objects and structures. This is what we are most accustomed to seeing. In order to preserve this natural perspective, oblique images are generally presented without being ortho-rectified and instead left in the natural appearance that the camera captures. This practice makes it very easy for people to look at something in an oblique image and realize what that object is.

However, the sun/sky orientation when an oblique image is taken has a major impact on the color balance of the resulting photograph due to the reflections of light from the sun 16. There are two major types of reflection: diffuse and specular. Flat wall paint is a highly diffuse reflector—that is, light bounces nearly equally in all directions. A mirror is a highly specular reflector—that is, light bounces almost entirely in one direction off the mirror. There is nothing in nature that is a perfect specular or a perfect diffuse reflector—everything is some combination of the two. It is the specular nature of objects that presents a problem for color balancing oblique images.

Color balancing nadir aerial images is known in the art. However, color balancing oblique aerial images presents unique challenges. When collecting nadir images (images captured with camera 14b pointing straight down), every image has a consistent orientation with respect to the sun 16. However, when collecting oblique images (images captured with the cameras 14a and 14c pointing at an oblique angle relative to the horizon) different images have different orientations with respect to the sun 16. For instance, in the northern hemisphere, a camera aimed to the north (camera 14c) points away from the sun 16, while a camera aimed to the south (camera 14a) points toward the sun 16.

Specular reflections bounce off a surface and leave the surface at roughly the same angle with which they hit the surface—like a ball bouncing off a flat surface. When the camera 14a is pointing towards the sun 16, the camera 14a picks up specular reflections from the sun 16 and therefore any images captured with that camera pick up a strong yellow/red tint to the captured scene. The camera 14c, on the other hand, is pointing away from the sun 16 and picks up specular reflections from the sky and therefore any images captured with that camera pick up a strong blue tint to the scene. When these two images are viewed side by side, the difference can be very noticeable and distracting to the overall image appearance. It is desirable to color balance the oblique images such that they have a substantially consistent color tone.

Shown in FIG. 2 is a diagrammatic view of the capturing of three different overlapping images of a same scene from three different positions. The three different positions are labeled as Position A, Position B and Position C for purposes of clarity. The scene is positioned in the northern hemisphere, and thus, the image captured from Position A is taken with the camera positioned in a southern orientation toward the sun 16, while the image captured from Position C is taken with the camera positioned in a northern orientation away from the sun 16. The image captured from Position B is taken with the camera positioned directly above the scene. In this example, the image captured from Position A has a yellow/reddish tint due to the strong specular reflections from the sun 16, the image captured from Position B has a neutral tint due to roughly equal specular reflections from the sun 16 and sky, and the image captured from Position C has a bluish tint due to the strong specular reflections from the sky.

Referring to FIG. 3, shown therein is a diagrammatic view of the capturing of an oblique image of the Earth 12 where a field of view of the camera is designated with the lines P1 and P2. The lines P1 and P2 represent path lengths, i.e., the distance the light travels from a scene on the Earth 12 to the camera. In an oblique image, the path lengths P1 and P2 are significantly different and this presents a second challenge to color balancing oblique images: the top of the image goes through significantly more atmosphere than the bottom of the image. In a nadir image, path length (the distance the light must travel from a scene on the Earth 12 to the camera) at the edges of the useable image are typically not all that much different than the path length to the nadir point. For instance, lines P3 and P4 represent the path lengths for a typical camera/lens configuration, the difference between the shortest path length (straight down) and the longest path length (to the far corner) is only about 6%.

But with oblique images, because of the nature of trigonometry, when the field of view angle is added to the oblique camera axis angle, the path lengths P1 and P2 are very different. To illustrate an extreme, if the top of the camera is pointed above the horizon then the path length P1 is infinite—clearly much longer than the path length P2 at the front of the image. In a typical camera/lens configuration and at a typical oblique angle, the difference between the shortest path length (to the middle front of the image) and the longest path length (to the far back corner of the image) is about 87%—nearly twice as long.

The challenge this difference in path length presents is that the light from the scene captured by the top of the camera travels through a lot more atmosphere than the light from the scene captured by the bottom of the camera. This results in more tinting or scattering, an increased introduction of blue sky light, an increase in blurriness, and a decrease in clarity due to smog or haze. Thus, if the image is color balanced based upon the tinting in the top of the image then the color balancing of the bottom of the image will be incorrect. Likewise, if the image is color-balanced based upon the tinting in the bottom of the image then the color-balancing of the top of the image will be incorrect. One could color-balance based upon the tinting in the middle of the image, but then the color-balancing of the top and bottom of the image would be incorrect.

In light of the foregoing, there is a need for a system and process for color-balancing oblique images that overcomes the challenges discussed above. It is to such a system and process that the present invention is directed.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

This patent or application file contains at least one drawing executed in color. Copies of this patent or patent application publication with color drawing(s) will be provided by the Office upon request and payment of the necessary fee.

So that the above recited features and advantages of the present invention can be understood in detail, a more particular description of the invention, briefly summarized above, may be had by reference to the embodiments thereof that are illustrated in the appended drawings. It is to be noted, however, that the appended drawings illustrate only typical embodiments of this invention and are therefore not to be considered limiting of its scope, for the invention may admit to other equally effective embodiments.

FIG. 1 is a diagrammatic view of an airplane flying over the Earth and capturing images utilizing three cameras.

FIG. 2 is a diagrammatic view of the capturing of three different overlapping images of a same scene from three different positions.

FIG. 3 is a diagrammatic view of the capturing of an oblique image of the Earth 12 where a field of view of an oblique aerial camera is designated utilizing the path lengths P1 and P2, i.e., the distance the light travels from a scene on the Earth to the camera, and a field of view of a nadir aerial camera is designated utilizing path lengths P3 and P4.

FIG. 4 is a schematic view of an image processing system constructed in accordance with the present invention.

FIG. 5 is a schematic view of an oblique image that has been sectioned in accordance with the present invention.

FIG. 6 is a schematic view of another example of an oblique image that has been sectioned in accordance with the present invention.

FIG. 7 is a histogram of a color distribution for a red color band of an oblique image in accordance with the present invention.

FIG. 8 is a histogram of a color distribution of a blue color band of an oblique image in accordance with the present invention.

FIG. 9 is a portion of a color oblique image captured by a camera angled away from the sun.

FIG. 10 is a portion of a color oblique image of the same area depicted in FIG. 9 but captured by a camera angled toward the sun.

 DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

Before explaining at least one embodiment of the invention in detail, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited in its application to the details of construction, experiments, exemplary data, and/or the arrangement of the components set forth in the following description or illustrated in the drawings. The invention is capable of other embodiments or of being practiced or carried out in various ways. Also, it is to be understood that the phraseology and terminology employed herein is for purpose of description and should not be regarded as limiting.

The processes described in this patent provide a means for color balancing oblique images so that they take on a consistent color tone. The principal behind these processes is to select a set of color-balanced images to use as reference images to create color-balance transformations for a series of oblique images so that the resulting color-balanced oblique images will have a color tone similar to the reference images. Because they typically have a consistent sun/sky orientation, nadir images are often the best choice for the reference images; however, this is not required. It is recommended that the reference images be from a consistent sun/sky orientation, so, for instance, instead of the nadir images, the north-looking oblique images could be used as the reference images and the remaining oblique images transformed to match their color tone.

The consistent color tone for the reference images can be achieved in a variety of manners, such as by having images that are naturally balanced, i.e., captured under similar conditions and/or orientations and therefore already have a consistent color tone, or by color-balancing the images to each other after they are captured so that they have a consistent color tone. Or nadir images captured under different conditions can first be color-balanced to each other to produce a consistent color tone. There are numerous methods for color-balancing nadir images described in remote sensing textbooks—basically any method that produces a consistent color tone for a set of similar images will work. As these methods for nadir images are known in the art, they are not discussed here.

Once the reference images have been selected, the oblique images can be color balanced to match. This is accomplished by finding one or more portion(s) of reference image(s) that correspond to the same area of the scene contained within the oblique image—in other words, finding their areas of overlap.

In a preferred embodiment, the reference images and the oblique images are geo-referenced so that finding the portions of the references image(s) corresponding to the same area of the scene contained within the oblique images can be accomplished with a computer and thereby automated.

Thus, in the preferred embodiment, the logic of the process described herein is executed by a computer to provide an automated process for color-balancing a series of oblique images.

Referring now to the drawings, and in particular to FIG. 4, shown therein and designated by a reference numeral 20 is an image processing system constructed in accordance with the present invention. In general, the image processing system 20 is provided with a computer 22, and a camera system 24. As will be described in more detail below, the image processing system 20 is adapted to color balance the series of oblique images captured from one or more positions and from one or more orientations so that such oblique images are provided with a substantially consistent color balance thereby reducing or even eliminating the unwanted yellowish/reddish or bluish tinting described above.

In general, the computer 22 receives a series of reference images, and a series of oblique images from the camera system 24. The reference images and the oblique images can be received by the computer system 22 either directly or indirectly from the camera system 24, and can be passed from the camera system 24 either in batches, in real-time with the capturing of the reference images and/or the oblique images, or at a period of time substantially after the capturing of the reference images and the oblique images. For example, the reference images and/or the oblique images can be transmitted or transferred from the camera system 24 to the computer system 22 days and/or weeks and/or years after the capturing of the reference images and the oblique images from the camera system 24.

The computer 22 preferably runs image processing software (or firmware) adapted to perform the functions described herein, and the resulting images and data are stored on one or more computer readable mediums. Examples of a computer readable medium include an optical storage device, a magnetic storage device, an electronic storage device or the like. The term “Computer” as used herein means a system or systems that are able to embody and/or execute the logic of the processes described herein. The logic embodied in the form of software instructions or firmware may be executed on any appropriate hardware which may be a dedicated system or systems, or a general purpose computer system, a personal computer system or distributed processing computer system, all of which are well understood in the art, and a detailed description of how to make or use such computer systems is not deemed necessary herein. When the computer 22 is used to execute the logic of the processes described herein, such computer(s) and/or execution can be conducted at a same geographic location or multiple different geographic locations. Furthermore, the execution of the logic can be conducted continuously or at multiple discrete times. Further, such logic can be performed about simultaneously with the capture of the images, or thereafter or combinations thereof.

The image capture system 24 is typically used for capturing aerial images as shown in FIGS. 1-3. Suitable image capture systems are shown and described in a provisional patent application identified by U.S. Ser. No. 60/901,444, the entire content of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference. Typically, the image capture system 24 is provided with, one or more image capture devices, one or more monitoring systems, one or more event multiplexer systems, and one or more data storage units or computer systems. In the examples depicted in FIGS. 1-3 of U.S. Ser. No. 60/901,444, the “image capture system 10” is provided with four image capture devices mounted in a sweep pattern (see FIG. 1 of U.S. Ser. No. 60/901,444); five image capture devices mounted in a 360 pattern having image capture devices pointing fore, aft, port, starboard and straight down (see FIG. 2 of U.S. Ser. No. 60/901,444); or four image capture devices mounted in separate directions generally aligned with respective parts of streets (see FIG. 3 of U.S. Ser. No. 60/901,444).

In certain embodiments, the image capture devices of the image capture system 24 can be mounted to a moving platform such as a manned airplane, an unmanned airplane, a train, an automobile such as a van, a boat, a four wheeler, a motor cycle, a tractor, a robotic device or the like.

As discussed above, the computer 22 executes instructions to effect the color-balancing of the series of oblique images captured from one or more positions and from one or more orientations. On an oblique image by oblique image basis, the computer 22 is programmed with instructions to locate one or more portions of one or more reference images that overlap the oblique image, and then create a color balancing transformation that approximately matches the color distribution of the oblique image to the color distribution of the overlapping portions of the reference images. Then, the computer 22 transforms pixels in the oblique image according to the color balancing transformation created for that oblique image, and then preferably stores the transform pixel values in the oblique image or a copy of the oblique image. The oblique images having the transformed pixel values are referred to herein after as “color-balanced oblique images”.

In a preferred embodiment, the reference images are geo-referenced to aid in the location of the overlapping portion(s), and also color-balanced. The reference images can be color-balanced either naturally because they are captured from a consistent orientation, or they can be color-balanced using well-known practices. In a preferred embodiment, the reference images are nadir images.

In a preferred embodiment, the overlapping portions of the reference images and the oblique images have a similar scene because it is expected that the scenes will be somewhat different. For example, assuming that the scene includes a building, the oblique images will show the sides of the building while the nadir images will not. Typically, the closer the scene contents in the overlapping portion(s) match (Leaf-on, leaf off, flooding, snow, or the like) the better the results. Ideally, the reference images and the oblique images will be taken during the same photo shoot to enhance the similarity of the lighting and scene content.

Preferably, one or more color balancing transformation is created for each of the oblique images in the series of oblique images. However, it should be understood that the one or more color balancing transformations do not have to be made for each of the oblique images in the series. In other words, not all of the oblique images in the series of oblique images must be color-balanced in accordance with the present invention. In addition, while all of the pixels in the oblique image are preferably transformed according to the one or more color balancing transformation created for that particular oblique image, it should be understood that less than all of the pixels can be transformed. For example, the pixels in the oblique image can be organized into groups, and then a certain percentage of such pixels (such as 60-90%) can be transformed.

In general, the automated process preferably (1) divides each oblique image in the series into a plurality of sections, (2) identifies a portion of a reference image overlapping the section, and then (3) creates a color-balancing transformation. Preferably a color-balancing transformation for each color band in the color space is created and for each section in the oblique image approximating the color distribution of the overlapping section in the one or more reference images. For example, assuming an RGB color space, a histogram of the color distribution for each color band, i.e., red, green and blue in each section of the oblique image and the overlapping portion of the same scene in the nadir image (develop two histograms for each section) is created. Exemplary histograms for the red and blue color bands are shown in FIGS. 7 and 8. The color space can be any suitable color space, such as RGB, XYZ, LUV, CMYK, or false color IR.

The color distribution histogram of an image shows the number of pixels for each pixel value within the range of the image. If the minimum value of the image is 0 and the maximum value of the image is 255, the histogram of the image shows the number of pixels for each value ranging between and including 0 and 255. Peaks in the histogram represent more common values within the image that usually consist of nearly uniform regions. Valleys in the histogram represent less common values. Empty regions within the histogram indicate that no pixels within the image contain those values. The solid lines shown in the histograms in FIGS. 7 and 8 show exemplary values of an aerial oblique image that has not yet been color-balanced while the dashed lines shown in the histograms show exemplary values of the same aerial oblique image that has been color-balanced utilizing the process described herein.

The solid line in the histogram of FIG. 7 shows the color distribution of the red band for an oblique image that was captured by a camera pointing in a generally south direction and that has a reddish tint due to the specular reflections from the sun 16, while the dashed line shows a reduction in the red pixel values in the color-balanced image. Similarly, the solid line in the histogram of FIG. 8 shows the color distribution of the blue band for an oblique image that was captured by a camera pointing in a generally north direction and that has a bluish tint due to the specular reflections from the sky. The dashed line in FIG. 8 shows a reduction in the blue pixel values in the color-balanced image.

To color-balance the series of oblique images, each of the oblique images are preferably divided into a plurality of sections. For example, an oblique image 30 shown in FIG. 5 has been divided into nine sections 32a-i, and the oblique image 34 shown in FIG. 6 has been divided into 6 sections 36a-f. Any number of sections can be used, but dividing the oblique image 30 into more sections decreases the likelihood of variability in the image. For example, oblique images can change color depending upon their orientation and the distance that the scene is away from the camera. Images taken in a direction away from the sun 16 are usually bluer at the top, while images taken in a direction toward the sun 16 have a reddish-orange cast. The number, size and location of the sections within the oblique images can be predetermined or randomly determined.

Once the oblique image has been divided into sections, then, on a section by section basis one or more portions of a reference image is located that overlaps the oblique image section. Then, a color-balancing transformation is created that approximately matches the color distribution of the oblique image section to the color distribution of the overlapping reference portion(s). This can be accomplished using any suitable algorithm or technique, such as histogram equalization. Histogram equalization is a well known algorithm, so no further comments are deemed necessary to teach one skilled in the art how to make and use histogram equalization. For the oblique image 30 that has been divided into nine oblique image sections 32a-i, this process occurs nine times.

For each section, at least three histograms (color distribution for the overlapping reference portion, color distribution for the oblique image section, and color balancing transformation for the oblique image section) are created for each color band in the color space.

Then, pixel values for each color band in each of the oblique images are color-balanced and blended to provide a substantially consistent color tone. This can be accomplished by using a combination of the color-balancing transformations (e.g., histograms) for the oblique image. The blending may be accomplished through bi-linear interpolation, linear interpolation, cubics, splines and/or the like. Alternatively, one transform may be used for the entire image.

In a preferred embodiment, the color-balancing and blending is accomplished as follows. First, on a pixel by pixel basis, for the oblique image to be color-balanced, one or more oblique image sections are selected which apply to the particular pixel. Then, for each color band, the pixel value is calculated independently (or transformed) using the color balancing transformation for each selected oblique image section yielding a transformed pixel value for each selected oblique image section. Then, the transformed pixel values are blended into a single resulting pixel value using any suitable algorithm, such as bi-linear interpolation, linear interpolation, cubics, splines or the like. Then, the resulting pixel value is stored in the oblique image or a copy (such as a memory copy) of the oblique image. This process is preferably repeated for every pixel in the oblique image. However, it should be understood that this process could only be repeated for a subset of the pixels.

In general, the process described above may be performed on a continuous or intermittent basis. For example, once the section color balancing transformations are created, such section color balancing transformations can be stored, and then applied on a pixel by pixel basis at a later time to color-balance the oblique image. For example, the color-balancing transformations can be stored with the oblique image and then utilized to color-balance the oblique image when it is retrieved or displayed.

Set forth hereinafter is pseudo-code for one embodiment of the present invention:

Select oblique images to adjust Select reference images For( each image to be color-balanced ){ Divide image into sections For( each image section used ){ Choose one or more overlapping reference images If ( only one reference image is chosen ) { Create section color-balancing transformation from chosen reference image } Else { Create empty section color-balancing transformation For ( each chosen reference image ){ Create temporary color-balancing transformation for this chosen reference image Combine temporary color-balancing transformation into section color-balancing transformation } } } For (each pixel to be transformed){ Create empty final pixel value For (each image section used){ If (section is applicable to pixel){ Compute transformed pixel value from section color- balancing transformation Blend transformed pixel value into final pixel value } } Store final pixel value } }

For RGB color images, the above process is repeated three times, once for each color pixel component, i.e. the red pixels, the green pixels, and the blue pixels, each with its own color-balancing transformation.

Although the foregoing invention has been described in some detail by way of illustration and example for purposes of clarity of understanding, it will be obvious to those skilled in the art that certain changes and modifications may be practiced without departing from the spirit and scope thereof, as described in this specification and as defined in the appended claims below. The term “comprising” within the claims is intended to mean “including at least” such that the recited listing of elements in a claim are an open group. “A,” “an” and other singular terms are intended to include the plural forms thereof unless specifically excluded.

Claims

1. An image processing system, comprising:

a computer having image processing software that, when executed by the computer, causes the computer to: divide an oblique aerial image into a plurality of sections, wherein a first section of the plurality of sections has a first color distribution and a second section of the plurality of sections has a second color distribution, the first color distribution differing from the second color distribution, and wherein each of the first section and the second section has pixels, each pixel having one or more color band; choose one or more reference aerial image, having a consistent color distribution, for the first section and the second section by automatically matching at least a portion of geographic information of the one or more reference aerial image with at least a portion of geographic information of the first section and the second section; create one or more first color-balancing transformation for one or more color band for the first section of the oblique aerial image, to match the first color distribution of the first section to the consistent color distribution of the chosen reference aerial image; color-balance one or more pixel in the first section of the oblique aerial image using the one or more first color-balancing transformation, such that the first color distribution of the first section matches the consistent color distribution of the chosen reference aerial image; create one or more second color-balancing transformation for the one or more color band for the second section of the oblique aerial image, to match the second color distribution of the second section to the consistent color distribution of the chosen reference aerial image; and color-balance one or more pixel in the second section of the oblique aerial image using the one or more second color-balancing transformation, such that the second color distribution of the second section matches the consistent color distribution of the chosen reference aerial image.

2. The image processing system of claim 1, wherein creating one or more color-balancing transformation for one or more color band for the first section and the second section of the oblique aerial image comprises creating a corresponding color-balancing transformation for each color band in a color space of the first section and the second section.

3. The image processing system of claim 1, wherein creating one or more color-balancing transformation for one or more color band for the first section comprises creating two color-balancing transformations for two color bands for the first section, wherein color-balancing one or more pixel in the first section further comprises combining the two color-balancing transformations into a single pixel color value.

4. The image processing system of claim 1, wherein the one or more color band comprises a red color band.

5. The image processing system of claim 1, wherein the one or more color band comprises a blue color band.

6. The image processing system of claim 1, wherein the one or more color band comprises a green color band.

7. The image processing system of claim 1, wherein the first color distribution of the first section of the oblique aerial image is caused by first specular reflections and the second color distribution of the second section of the oblique aerial image is caused by second specular reflections.

8. The image processing system of claim 1, wherein a difference between the first color distribution of the first section of the oblique aerial image and the second color distribution of the second section of the oblique aerial image is based on differing path length distances between a first location of a first point in the first section and a camera when the oblique aerial image was captured and a second location of a second point in the second section and the camera when the oblique aerial image was captured.

9. The image processing system of claim 1, wherein the one or more reference aerial image comprises a nadir aerial image.

10. The image processing system of claim 1, wherein the one or more reference aerial image comprises another oblique aerial image.

11. An image processing method for color-balancing oblique images, comprising:

dividing, with a computer running image processing software, an oblique aerial image into a plurality of sections, wherein a first section of the plurality of sections has a first color distribution and a second section of the plurality of sections has a second color distribution, the first color distribution differing from the second color distribution, and wherein each of the first section and the second section has pixels, each pixel having at least one color band;
choosing, with the computer, one or more reference aerial image, having a consistent color distribution, for the first section and the second section by automatically matching at least a portion of geographic information of the one or more reference aerial image with at least a portion of geographic information of the first section and the second section;
creating, with the computer, one or more first color-balancing transformation for one or more color band for the first section of the oblique aerial image, to match the first color distribution of the first section to the consistent color distribution of the chosen reference aerial image;
color-balancing, with the computer, one or more pixel in the first section of the oblique aerial image using the one or more first color-balancing transformation, such that the first color distribution of the first section matches the consistent color distribution of the chosen reference aerial image;
creating, with the computer, one or more second color-balancing transformation for the one or more color band for the second section of the oblique aerial image, to match the second color distribution of the second section to the consistent color distribution of the chosen reference aerial image; and
color-balancing, with the computer, one or more pixel in the second section of the oblique aerial image using the one or more second color-balancing transformation, such that the second color distribution of the second section matches the consistent color distribution of the chosen reference aerial image.

12. The image processing method of claim 11, wherein creating one or more color-balancing transformation for one or more color band for the first section and the second section of the oblique aerial image comprises creating a corresponding color-balancing transformation for each color band in a color space of the first section and the second section.

13. The image processing method of claim 11, wherein creating one or more color-balancing transformation for one or more color band for the first section comprises creating two color-balancing transformations for two color bands for the first section, wherein color-balancing one or more pixel in the first section further comprises combining the two color-balancing transformations into a single pixel color value.

14. The image processing method of claim 11, wherein the one or more color band comprises a red color band.

15. The image processing method of claim 11, wherein the one or more color band comprises a blue color band.

16. The image processing method of claim 11, wherein the one or more color band comprises a green color band.

17. The image processing method of claim 11, wherein the first color distribution of the first section of the oblique aerial image is caused by first specular reflections and the second color distribution of the second section of the oblique aerial image is caused by second specular reflections.

18. The image processing method of claim 11, wherein a difference between the first color distribution of the first section of the oblique aerial image and the second color distribution of the second section of the oblique aerial image is based on differing path length distances between a first location of a first point in the first section and a camera when the oblique aerial image was captured and a second location of a second point in the second section and the camera when the oblique aerial image was captured.

19. The image processing method of claim 11, wherein the one or more reference aerial image comprises a nadir aerial image.

20. The image processing method of claim 11, wherein the one or more reference aerial image comprises another oblique aerial image.

Referenced Cited
U.S. Patent Documents
2273876 February 1942 Lutz et al.
3153784 October 1964 Petrides et al.
3594556 July 1971 Edwards
3614410 October 1971 Bailey
3621326 November 1971 Hobrough
3661061 May 1972 Tokarz
3716669 February 1973 Watanabe et al.
3725563 April 1973 Woycechowsky
3864513 February 1975 Halajian et al.
3866602 February 1975 Furihata
3877799 April 1975 O'Donnell
4015080 March 29, 1977 Moore-Searson
4044879 August 30, 1977 Stahl
4184711 January 22, 1980 Wakimoto
4240108 December 16, 1980 Levy
4281354 July 28, 1981 Conte
4344683 August 17, 1982 Stemme
4360876 November 23, 1982 Girault et al.
4382678 May 10, 1983 Thompson et al.
4387056 June 7, 1983 Stowe
4396942 August 2, 1983 Gates
4463380 July 31, 1984 Hooks
4489322 December 18, 1984 Zulch et al.
4490742 December 25, 1984 Wurtzinger
4491399 January 1, 1985 Bell
4495500 January 22, 1985 Vickers
4527055 July 2, 1985 Harkless et al.
4543603 September 24, 1985 Laures
4586138 April 29, 1986 Mullenhoff et al.
4635136 January 6, 1987 Ciampa et al.
4653136 March 31, 1987 Denison
4653316 March 31, 1987 Fukuhara
4673988 June 16, 1987 Jansson et al.
4686474 August 11, 1987 Olsen et al.
4688092 August 18, 1987 Kamel et al.
4689748 August 25, 1987 Hofmann
4707698 November 17, 1987 Constant et al.
4758850 July 19, 1988 Archdale et al.
4805033 February 14, 1989 Nishikawa
4807024 February 21, 1989 Mclaurin et al.
4814711 March 21, 1989 Olsen et al.
4814896 March 21, 1989 Heitzman et al.
4843463 June 27, 1989 Michetti
4899296 February 6, 1990 Khattak
4906198 March 6, 1990 Cosimano et al.
4953227 August 28, 1990 Katsuma et al.
4956872 September 11, 1990 Kimura
5034812 July 23, 1991 Rawlings
5086314 February 4, 1992 Aoki et al.
5121222 June 9, 1992 Endoh et al.
5138444 August 11, 1992 Hiramatsu
5155597 October 13, 1992 Lareau et al.
5164825 November 17, 1992 Kobayashi et al.
5166789 November 24, 1992 Myrick
5191174 March 2, 1993 Chang et al.
5200793 April 6, 1993 Ulich et al.
5210586 May 11, 1993 Grage et al.
5231435 July 27, 1993 Blakely
5247356 September 21, 1993 Ciampa
5251037 October 5, 1993 Busenberg
5265173 November 23, 1993 Griffin et al.
5267042 November 30, 1993 Tsuchiya et al.
5270756 December 14, 1993 Busenberg
5296884 March 22, 1994 Honda et al.
5335072 August 2, 1994 Tanaka et al.
5337093 August 9, 1994 Kaneko et al.
5342999 August 30, 1994 Frei et al.
5345086 September 6, 1994 Bertram
5353055 October 4, 1994 Hiramatsu
5363318 November 8, 1994 McCauley
5369443 November 29, 1994 Woodham
5402170 March 28, 1995 Parulski et al.
5414462 May 9, 1995 Veatch
5467271 November 14, 1995 Abel et al.
5481479 January 2, 1996 Wight et al.
5486948 January 23, 1996 Imai et al.
5506644 April 9, 1996 Suzuki et al.
5508736 April 16, 1996 Cooper
5555018 September 10, 1996 von Braun
5563654 October 8, 1996 Song
5604534 February 18, 1997 Hedges et al.
5617224 April 1, 1997 Ichikawa et al.
5633946 May 27, 1997 Lachinski et al.
5668593 September 16, 1997 Lareau et al.
5677515 October 14, 1997 Selk et al.
5798786 August 25, 1998 Lareau et al.
5835133 November 10, 1998 Moreton et al.
5841574 November 24, 1998 Willey
5844602 December 1, 1998 Lareau et al.
5852753 December 22, 1998 Lo et al.
5894323 April 13, 1999 Kain et al.
5899945 May 4, 1999 Baylocq et al.
5963664 October 5, 1999 Kumar et al.
6037945 March 14, 2000 Loveland
6088055 July 11, 2000 Lareau et al.
6094215 July 25, 2000 Sundahl et al.
6097854 August 1, 2000 Szeliski et al.
6108032 August 22, 2000 Hoagland
6130705 October 10, 2000 Lareau et al.
6157747 December 5, 2000 Szeliski et al.
6167300 December 26, 2000 Cherepenin et al.
6222583 April 24, 2001 Matsumura et al.
6236382 May 22, 2001 Kawakami et al.
6236886 May 22, 2001 Cherepenin et al.
6249315 June 19, 2001 Holm
6256004 July 3, 2001 Izumi et al.
6256057 July 3, 2001 Mathews et al.
6373522 April 16, 2002 Mathews et al.
6421610 July 16, 2002 Carroll et al.
6434280 August 13, 2002 Peleg et al.
6594388 July 15, 2003 Gindele
6597818 July 22, 2003 Kumar et al.
6639596 October 28, 2003 Shum et al.
6650771 November 18, 2003 Walker
6664973 December 16, 2003 Iwamoto
6711475 March 23, 2004 Murphy
6714243 March 30, 2004 Mathur
6731329 May 4, 2004 Feist et al.
6747686 June 8, 2004 Bennett
6754279 June 22, 2004 Zhou
6791711 September 14, 2004 Uekusa
6810383 October 26, 2004 Loveland
6816819 November 9, 2004 Loveland
6826539 November 30, 2004 Loveland
6829584 December 7, 2004 Loveland
6834128 December 21, 2004 Altunbasak et al.
6876763 April 5, 2005 Sorek et al.
7009638 March 7, 2006 Gruber et al.
7018050 March 28, 2006 Ulichney et al.
7046401 May 16, 2006 Dufaux et al.
7061650 June 13, 2006 Walmsley et al.
7065260 June 20, 2006 Zhang et al.
7123382 October 17, 2006 Walmsley et al.
7127348 October 24, 2006 Smitherman et al.
7133551 November 7, 2006 Chen
7142984 November 28, 2006 Rahmes et al.
7184072 February 27, 2007 Loewen et al.
7233691 June 19, 2007 Setterholm
7262790 August 28, 2007 Bakewell
7348895 March 25, 2008 Lagassey
7397972 July 8, 2008 Shimizu et al.
7457458 November 25, 2008 Daniel et al.
7509241 March 24, 2009 Guo
7728833 June 1, 2010 Verma
7832267 November 16, 2010 Woro
7844499 November 30, 2010 Yahiro
7991226 August 2, 2011 Schultz
8078396 December 13, 2011 Meadow
8649596 February 11, 2014 Schultz
8705843 April 22, 2014 Lieckfeldt
8971624 March 3, 2015 Schultz
9503615 November 22, 2016 Schultz
10580169 March 3, 2020 Schultz
20020041328 April 11, 2002 LeCompte et al.
20020041717 April 11, 2002 Murata et al.
20020114536 August 22, 2002 Xiong et al.
20030014224 January 16, 2003 Guo et al.
20030043824 March 6, 2003 Remboski et al.
20030088362 May 8, 2003 Melero et al.
20030164962 September 4, 2003 Nims et al.
20030214585 November 20, 2003 Bakewell
20040057633 March 25, 2004 Mai et al.
20040105090 June 3, 2004 Schultz et al.
20040167709 August 26, 2004 Smitherman et al.
20050073241 April 7, 2005 Yamauchi et al.
20050088251 April 28, 2005 Matsumoto
20050169521 August 4, 2005 Hel-Or
20060028550 February 9, 2006 Palmer et al.
20060080037 April 13, 2006 Borg et al.
20060092043 May 4, 2006 Lagassey
20060195858 August 31, 2006 Takahashi et al.
20060238383 October 26, 2006 Kimchi et al.
20060250515 November 9, 2006 Koseki et al.
20070024612 February 1, 2007 Balfour
20070046448 March 1, 2007 Smitherman
20070050340 March 1, 2007 Von Kaenel et al.
20070237420 October 11, 2007 Steedly et al.
20080120031 May 22, 2008 Rosenfeld et al.
20080123994 May 29, 2008 Schultz et al.
20080136752 June 12, 2008 Inoue et al.
20080158256 July 3, 2008 Russell et al.
20080273090 November 6, 2008 Niimura
20090174836 July 9, 2009 Yoo et al.
20090177458 July 9, 2009 Hochart et al.
20090208095 August 20, 2009 Zebedin
20090304227 December 10, 2009 Kennedy et al.
20100296693 November 25, 2010 Thornberry et al.
20110033110 February 10, 2011 Shimamura et al.
20130246204 September 19, 2013 Thornberry et al.
20160209716 July 21, 2016 Kim
Foreign Patent Documents
331204 July 2006 AT
0316110 September 2005 BR
2402234 September 2000 CA
2505566 May 2004 CA
1735897 February 2006 CN
60017384 March 2006 DE
60306301 November 2006 DE
1418402 October 2006 DK
1010966 February 1999 EP
1180967 February 2002 EP
1418402 May 2004 EP
1696204 August 2006 EP
2266704 March 2007 ES
2003/317089 November 2003 JP
PA05004987 February 2006 MX
WO99/18732 April 1999 WO
WO/2000/053090 September 2000 WO
WO/2004/044692 May 2004 WO
WO/2005/088251 September 2005 WO
WO/2008/028040 March 2008 WO
Other references
  • Ackermann, Prospects of Kinematic GPS Aerial Triangulation, ITC Journal, 1992.
  • Ciampa, John A., “Pictometry Digital Video Mapping”, SPIE, vol. 2598, pp. 140-148, 1995.
  • Ciampa, J. A., Oversee, Presented at Reconstruction After Urban earthquakes, Buffalo, NY, 1989.
  • Dunford et al., Remote Sensing for Rural Development Planning in Africa, The Journal for the International Institute for Aerial Survey and Earth Sciences, 2:99-108, 1983.
  • Gagnon, P.A., Agnard, J. P., Nolette, C., & Boulianne, M., “A Micro-Computer based General Photogrammetric System”, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, vol. 56, No. 5., pp. 623-625, 1990.
  • Konecny, G., “Issues of Digital Mapping”, Leibniz University Hannover, Germany, GIS Ostrava 2008, Ostrava 27.-30.1.2008, pp. 1-8.
  • Konecny, G., “Analytical Aerial Triangulation with Convergent Photography”, Department of Surveying Engineering, University of New Brunswick, pp. 37-57, 1966.
  • Konecny, G., “Interior Orientation and Convergent Photography”, Photogrammetric Engineering, pp. 625-634, 1965.
  • Graham, Lee A., “Airborne Video for Near-Real-Time Vegetation Mapping”, Journal of Forestry, 8:28-32, 1993.
  • Graham, Horita TRG-50 SMPTE Time-Code Reader, Generator, Window Inserter, 1990.
  • Hess, L.L, et al., “Geocoded Digital Videography for Validation of Land Cover Mapping in the Amazon Basin”, International Journal of Remote Sensing, vol. 23, No. 7, pp. 1527-1555, 2002.
  • Hinthorne, J., et al., “Image Processing in the Grass GIS”, Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 4:2227-2229, 1991.
  • Imhof, Ralph K., “Mapping from Oblique Photographs”, Manual of Photogrammetry, Chapter 18, 1966.
  • Jensen, John R., Introductory Digital Image Processing: A Remote Sensing Perspective, Prentice-Hall, 1986; 399 pages.
  • Lapine, Lewis A., “Practical Photogrammetric Control by Kinematic GPS”, GPS World, 1(3):44-49, 1990.
  • Lapine, Lewis A., Airborne Kinematic GPS Positioning for Photogrammetry—The Determination of the Camera Exposure Station, Silver Spring, MD, 11 pages, at least as early as 2000.
  • Linden et al., Airborne Video Automated Processing, US Forest Service Internal report, Fort Collins, CO, 1993.
  • Myhre, Dick, “Airborne Video System Users Guide”, USDA Forest Service, Forest Pest Management Applications Group, published by Management Assistance Corporation of America, 6 pages, 1992.
  • Myhre et al., “An Airborne Video System Developed Within Forest Pest Management—Status and Activities”, 10 pages, 1992.
  • Myhre et al., “Airborne Videography—A Potential Tool for Resource Managers”—Proceedings: Resource Technology 90, 2nd International Symposium on Advanced Technology in Natural Resource Management, 5 pages, 1990.
  • Myhre et al., Aerial Photography for Forest Pest Management, Proceedings of Second Forest Service Remote Sensing Applications Conference, Slidell, Louisiana, 153-162, 1988.
  • Myhre et al., “Airborne Video Technology”, Forest Pest Management/Methods Application Group, Fort Collins, CO, pp. 1-6, at least as early as Jul. 30, 2006.
  • Norton-Griffiths et al., 1982. “Sample surveys from light aircraft combining visual observations and very large scale color photography”. University of Arizona Remote Sensing Newsletter 82-2:1-4.
  • Norton-Griffiths et al., “Aerial Point Sampling for Land Use Surveys”, Journal of Biogeography, 15:149-156, 1988.
  • Novak, Rectification of Digital Imagery, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 339-344, 1992.
  • Slaymaker, Dana M., “Point Sampling Surveys with GPS-logged Aerial Videography”, Gap Bulletin No. 5, University of Idaho, http://www.agp.uidaho.edu/Bulletins/5/PSSwGPS.html, 1996.
  • Slaymaker, et al., “Madagascar Protected Areas Mapped with GPS-logged Aerial Video and 35mm Air Photos”, Earth Observation magazine, vol. 9, No. 1, http://www.eomonline.com/Common/Archives/2000jan/00jan_tableofcontents.html, pp. 1-4, 2000.
  • Slaymaker, et al., “Cost-effective Determination of Biomass from Aerial Images”, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 1737:67-76, http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=648004.743267&coll=GUIDE&dl=,1999.
  • Slaymaker, et al., “A System for Real-time Generation of Geo-referenced Terrain Models”, 4232A-08, SPIE Enabling Technologies for Law Enforcement Boston, MA, ftp://vis-ftp.cs.umass.edu/Papers/schultz/spie2000.pdf, 2000.
  • Slaymaker, et al., “Integrating Small Format Aerial Photography, Videography, and a Laser Profiler for Environmental Monitoring”, In ISPRS WG III/1 Workshop on Integrated Sensor Calibration and Orientation, Portland, Maine, 1999.
  • Slaymaker, et al., “Calculating Forest Biomass With Small Format Aerial Photography, Videography and a Profiling Laser”, In Proceedings of the 17th Biennial Workshop on Color Photography and Videography in Resource Assessment, Reno, NV, 1999.
  • Slaymaker et al., Mapping Deciduous Forests in Southern New England using Aerial Videography and Hyperclustered Multi-Temporal Landsat TM Imagery, Department of Forestry and Wildlife Management, University of Massachusetts, 1996.
  • Star et al., “Geographic Information Systems an Introduction”, Prentice-Hall, 1990.
  • Tomasi et al., “Shape and Motion from Image Streams: a Factorization Method”—Full Report on the Orthographic Case, pp. 9795-9802, 1992.
  • Warren, Fire Mapping with the Fire Mousetrap, Aviation and Fire Management, Advanced Electronics System Development Group, USDA Forest Service, 1986.
  • Welch, R., “Desktop Mapping with Personal Computers”, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 1651-1662, 1989.
  • Westervelt, James, “Introduction to GRASS 4”, pp. 1-25, 1991.
  • “RGB Spectrum Videographics Report, vol. 4, No. 1, McDonnell Douglas Integrates RGB Spectrum Systems in Helicopter Simulators”, pp. 1-6, 1995.
  • RGB “Computer Wall”, RGB Spectrum, 4 pages, 1995.
  • “The First Scan Converter with Digital Video Output”, Introducing . . . The RGB/Videolink 1700D-1, RGB Spectrum, 2 pages, 1995.
  • ERDAS Field Guide, Version 7.4, A Manual for a commercial image processing system, 1990.
  • “Image Measurement and Aerial Photography”, Magazine for all branches of Photogrammetry and its fringe areas, Organ of the German Photogrammetry Association, Berlin-Wilmersdorf, No. 1, 1958.
  • “Airvideo Analysis”, MicroImages, Inc., Lincoln, NE, 1 page, Dec. 1992.
  • Zhu, Zhigang, Hanson, Allen R., “Mosaic-Based 3D Scene Representation and Rendering”, Image Processing, 2005, ICIP 2005, IEEE International Conference on 1(2005).
  • Mostafa, et al., “Direct Positioning and Orientation Systems How do they Work? What is the Attainable Accuracy?”, Proceeding, American Society of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing Annual Meeting, St. Louis, MO, Apr. 24-27, 2001.
  • “POS AV” georeferenced by APPLANIX aided inertial technology, http://www.applanix.com/products/posav_index.php.
  • Mostafa, et al., “Ground Accuracy from Directly Georeferenced Imagery”, Published in GIM International vol. 14 N. Dec. 12, 2000.
  • Mostafa, et al., “Airborne Direct Georeferencing of Frame Imagery: An Error Budget”, The 3rd International Symposium on Mobile Mapping Technology, Cairo, Egypt, Jan. 3-5, 2001.
  • Mostafa, M.R. and Hutton, J., “Airborne Kinematic Positioning and Attitude Determination Without Base Stations”, Proceedings, International Symposium on Kinematic Systems in Geodesy, Geomatics, and Navigation (KIS 2001) Banff, Alberta, Canada, Jun. 4-8, 2001.
  • Mostafa, et al., “Airborne DGPS Without Dedicated Base Stations for Mapping Applications”, Proceedings of ION-GPS 2001, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA, Sep. 11-14.
  • Mostafa, “ISAT Direct Exterior Orientation QA/QC Strategy Using POS Data”, Proceedings of OEEPE Workshop: Integrated Sensor Orientation, Hanover, Germany, Sep. 17-18, 2001.
  • Mostafa, “Camera/IMU Boresight Calibration: New Advances and Performance Analysis”, Proceedings of the ASPRS Annual Meeting, Washington, D.C., Apr. 21-26, 2002.
  • Hiatt, “Sensor Integration Aids Mapping at Ground Zero”, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, Sep. 2002, p. 877-878.
  • Mostafa, “Precision Aircraft GPS Positioning Using CORS”, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, Nov. 2002, p. 1125-1126.
  • Mostafa, et al., System Performance Analysis of INS/DGPS Integrated System for Mobile Mapping System (MMS), Department of Geomatics Engineering, University of Calgary, Commission VI, WG VI/4, Mar. 2004.
  • Artes F., & Hutton, J., “GPS and Inertial Navigation Delivering”, Sep. 2005, GEOconnexion International Magazine, p. 52-53, Sep. 2005.
  • “POS AV” APPLANIX, Product Outline, airborne@applanix.com, 3 pages, Mar. 28, 2007.
  • POSTrack, “Factsheet”, APPLANIX, Ontario, Canada, www.applanix.com, Mar. 2007.
  • POS AV “Digital Frame Camera Applications”, 3001 Inc., Brochure, 2007.
  • POS AV “Digital Scanner Applications”, Earthdata Brochure, Mar. 2007.
  • POS AV “Film Camera Applications” AeroMap Brochure, Mar. 2007.
  • POS AV “LIDAR Applications” MD Atlantic Brochure, Mar. 2007.
  • POS AV “OEM System Specifications”, 2005.
  • POS AV “Synthetic Aperture Radar Applications”, Overview, Orbisat Brochure, Mar. 2007.
  • “POSTrack V5 Specifications” 2005.
  • “Remote Sensing for Resource Inventory Planning and Monitoring”, Proceeding of the Second Forest Service Remote Sensing Applications Conference—Slidell, Louisiana and NSTL, Mississippi, Apr. 11-15, 1988.
  • “Protecting Natural Resources with Remote Sensing”, Proceeding of the Third Forest Service Remote Sensing Applications Conference—Apr. 9-13, 1990.
  • Heipke, et al, “Test Goals and Test Set Up for the OEEPE Test—Integrated Sensor Orientation”, 1999.
  • Kumar, et al., “Registration of Video to Georeferenced Imagery”, Sarnoff Corporation, CN5300, Princeton, NJ, 1998.
  • McConnel, Proceedings Aerial Pest Detection and Monitoring Workshop—1994.pdf, USDA Forest Service Forest Pest Management, Northern Region, Intermountain region, Forest Insects and Diseases, Pacific Northwest Region.
  • “Standards for Digital Orthophotos”, National Mapping Program Technical Instructions, US Department of the Interior, Dec. 1996.
  • Tao, “Mobile Mapping Technology for Road Network Data Acquisition”, Journal of Geospatial Engineering, vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 1-13, 2000.
  • “Mobile Mapping Systems Lesson 4”, Lesson 4 SURE 382 Geographic Information Systems II, pp. 1-29, Jul. 2, 2006.
  • Konecny, G., “Mechanische Radialtriangulation mit Konvergentaufnahmen”, Bildmessung und Luftbildwesen, 1958, Nr. 1.
  • Myhre, “ASPRS/ACSM/RT 92” Technical papers, Washington, D.C., vol. 5 Resource Technology 92, Aug. 3-8, 1992.
  • Rattigan, “Towns get new view from above,” The Boston Globe, Sep. 5, 2002.
  • Mostafa, et al., “Digital image georeferencing from a multiple camera system by GPS/INS,” ISP RS Journal of Photogrammetry & Remote Sensing, 56(I): I-12, Jun. 2001.
  • Dillow, “Grin, or bare it, for aerial shot,” Orange County Register (California), Feb. 25, 200I.
  • Anonymous, “Live automatic coordinates for aerial images,” Advanced Imaging, 12(6):51, Jun. 1997.
  • Anonymous, “Pictometry and US Geological Survey announce—Cooperative Research and Development Agreement,” Press Release published Oct. 20, 1999.
  • Miller, “Digital software gives small Arlington the Big Picture,” Government Computer NewsState & Local, 7(12), Dec. 2001.
  • Garrett, “Pictometry: Aerial photography on steroids,” Law Enforcement Technology 29(7):114-116, Jul. 2002.
  • Weaver, “County gets an eyeful,” The Post-Standard (Syracuse, NY), May 18, 2002.
  • Reed, “Firm gets latitude to map O.C. in 3D,” Orange County Register (California), Sep. 27, 2000.
  • Reyes, “Orange County freezes ambitious aerial photography project,” Los Angeles Times, Oct. 16, 2000.
  • Aerowest Pricelist of Geodata as of Oct. 21, 2005 and translations to English 3 pages.
  • www.archive.org Web site showing archive of German AeroDach Web Site http://www.aerodach.de from Jun. 13, 2004 (retrieved Sep. 20, 2012) and translations to English 4 pages.
  • AeroDach® Online Roof Evaluation Standard Delivery Format and 3D Data File: Document Version 01.00.2002 with publication in 2002, 13 pages.
  • Noronha et al., “Detection and Modeling of Building from Multiple Aerial Images,” Institute for Robotics and Intelligent Systems, University of Southern California, Nov. 27, 2001, 32 pages.
  • Applicad Reports dated Nov. 25, 1999-Mar. 9, 2005, 50 pages.
  • Applicad Online Product Bulletin archive from Jan. 7, 2003, 4 pages.
  • Applicad Sorcerer Guide, Version 3, Sep. 8, 1999, 142 pages.
  • Xactimate Claims Estimating Software archive from Feb. 12, 2010, 8 pages.
  • Bignone et al, Automatic Extraction of Generic House Roofs from High Resolution Aerial Imagery, Communication Technology Laboratory, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology ETH, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland, 12 pages, 1996.
  • Geospan 2007 Job proposal.
  • Greening et al., Commercial Applications of GPS-Assisted Photogrammetry, Presented at GIS/LIS Annual Conference and Exposition, Phoenix, AZ, Oct. 1994.
  • APPLANIX Corp, Robust, Precise Position and Orientation Solutions, POS/AV & POS/DG Installation & Operation Manual, Redefining the way you survey, May 19, 1999, Ontario, Canada.
  • APPLANIX Corp, Robust, Precise Position and Orientation Solutions, POS/AV V4 Ethernet & Disk Logging ICD, Redefining the way you survey, Revision 3, Apr. 18, 2001, Ontario, Canada.
  • International Search Authority—U.S.; International Search Report and Written Opinion regarding PCT/US08/75909; dated Jan. 12, 2009.
  • Chandeller, Laure; and Martinoty, Gilles, “A Radiometric Aerial Triangulation for the Equalization of Digital Aerial Images and Orthoimages,” Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, vol. 75, No. 2, Feb. 2009, pp. 193-200.
  • Canadian Patent Office; Canadian Office Action dated Sep. 27, 2013 for application 2,702,258.
  • Applicant; Response to Sep. 27, 2013 Canadian Office Action regarding application 2,702,258; dated Mar. 26, 2014.
  • Canadian Patent Office; Canadian Office Action dated Apr. 23, 2014 for application 2,702,258.
  • Applicant; Response to Apr. 23, 2014 Canadian Office Action regarding application 2,702,258; dated Oct. 8, 2014.
  • Canadian Patent Office; Canadian Office Action dated Nov. 27, 2014 for application 2,702,258.
  • Applicant; Response to Nov. 27, 2014 Canadian Office Action regarding application 2,702,258; dated May 27, 2015.
  • European Patent Office; Supplementary European search report and European search opinion regarding European Patent Application No. 08838178.5 PCT/US200807509; dated Aug. 8, 2013.
  • Ming-Sui, Lee, et al., “Pixel and Compressed-Domain Color Matching Techniques for Video Mosaic Applications,” Visual Communications and Image Processing, Jan. 20, 2004; San Jose, XP030081342, Ch. 2.1.
  • Kim, D-H, et al., “An Efficient Method to build panoramic image mosaics,” Pattern Recognition Letters, Elsevier, vol. 24, No. 14, pp. 2421-2429, Oct. 1, 2003, XP004437193, Technical Fields, ISSN: 0167-8655.
  • Applicant; Response to Aug. 8, 2013 Supplementary European search report and European search opinion regarding European Patent Application No. 08838178.5; dated Mar. 6, 2014.
  • USPTO, Office Action regarding U.S. Appl. No. 12/031,576, dated Dec. 21, 2010.
  • Pictometry International Corp., Response to Office Action regarding U.S. Appl. No. 12/031,576, dated Jun. 21, 2011.
  • USPTO, Office Action regarding U.S. Appl. No. 12/031,576, dated Sep. 16, 2011.
  • Pictometry International Corp., Response to Office Action regarding U.S. Appl. No. 12/031,576, dated Mar. 16, 2012.
  • USPTO, Office Action regarding U.S. Appl. No. 12/031,576, dated Nov. 27, 2012.
  • Pictometry International Corp., Response to Office Action regarding U.S. Appl. No. 12/031,576, dated Jan. 15, 2013.
  • Luong et al., “Fully Parallel Superconducting Analog-to-Digital Converter”, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, vol. 3, No. 1, Mar. 1993, pp. 2633-2636.
  • European Patent Office, Examination Report regarding European Patent Application No. 08838178.5, dated Nov. 8, 2016.
  • Pictometry International Corp., Response to Examination Report regarding European Patent Application No. 08838178.5, dated Mar. 10, 2017.
  • European Patent Office, Summons to Attend Oral Proceedings regarding European Patent Application No. 08838178.5, dated Feb. 8, 2018.
  • Pictometry International Corp., Written Submission in Response to Summons to Attend Oral Proceedings regarding European Patent Application No. 08838178.5, dated May 25, 2018.
  • European Patent Office, Communication Maintaining Oral Proceedings regarding European Patent Application No. 08838178.5, dated Jun. 12, 2018.
  • European Patent Office, Decision to Refuse European Patent Application No. 08838178.5, dated Jul. 12, 2018.
  • Pictometry International Corp., Appeal Grounds regarding European Patent Application No. 08838178.5, dated Nov. 12, 2018.
  • Rochester Institute of Technology, “Wildfire Airborne Sensor Program (WASP) Project Overview,” Chester F. Carlson Center for Imaging Science, Industrial Associates Meeting, May 13, 2003.
Patent History
Patent number: 11087506
Type: Grant
Filed: Mar 2, 2020
Date of Patent: Aug 10, 2021
Patent Publication Number: 20200202583
Assignee: Pictometry International Corp. (Rochester, NY)
Inventors: Stephen L. Schultz (West Henrietta, NY), Frank D. Giuffrida (Honeoye Falls, NY), Robert Gray (Canandiagua, NY)
Primary Examiner: Amir Alavi
Application Number: 16/806,347
Classifications
Current U.S. Class: For Receivers (epo) (348/E17.005)
International Classification: G06K 9/00 (20060101); G06T 11/00 (20060101); H04N 1/60 (20060101); G06T 5/00 (20060101); G06T 7/90 (20170101);